Tag: Titanic

  • 26 Things You Never Knew About ‘Titanic’

    Hard to imagine now, but before “Titanic” was released two decades ago (on December 19, 1997), much of Hollywood expected the then-most expensive film ever made to be a colossal failure. It would sink at the box office like — well, you know.

    Even James Cameron had his doubts that the film would work, fearing that blending an intimate-scale teenage romance with an epic-scale disaster movie would be like “chocolate syrup on a cheeseburger.”

    You know how the story ends, though. “Titanic” became the biggest hit in Hollywood history (until Cameron’s own “Avatar” surpassed it 12 years later), won a record number of Oscars (including Best Picture), turned Leonardo DiCaprio into a box office titan, made Kate Winslet a globally-beloved actress, and crowned writer/director Cameron as King of the World.

    You’ve probably seen the movie so many times that that damn Celine Dion song is still stuck in your head today. Even so, you may not know about the film’s tempestuous production history that spawned all that pre-release pessimism. Here’s how it all went down.
    1. Cameron’s interest in the Titanic began a decade before the movie’s release, when he saw the National Geographic documentary by Robert Ballard, the leader of the team that found the Titanic wreckage on the Atlantic Ocean floor. Still, the “Terminator” director had never made a romance or a period drama, and he had a hard time selling 20th Century Fox on his idea.

    2. Nonetheless, he got the studio to pony up $2 million to send him on an expedition to the shipwreck site. 3. Armed with a submarine-mount camera designed by his aerospace-engineer brother, Cameron captured Titanic footage like none other yet obtained — chandeliers, piles of furniture, and staterooms with intact woodwork and decor. The footage sealed the deal.

    4. For Rose, Cameron considered such young actresses as Gwyneth Paltrow, Claire Danes, and Gabrielle Anwar, but Kate Winslet lobbied him hard for the part with daily notes and phone calls. One missive was a card that read “From Your Rose,” accompanied by a single rose. Another time, she called him in his car and said, “You don’t understand! I am Rose. I don’t know why you’re even seeing someone else.” Eventually, the director agreed.
    5. For Jack, the filmmakers initially wanted Matthew McConaughey. But then they decided they needed a Jack who looked about 20, ruling out the 26-year-old “A Time to Kill” star.

    6. They also considered Chris O’Donnell, Jared Leto, and the then-unknown Billy Crudup. But when Leonardo DiCaprio screen tested with Winslet, both the director and the actress thought he was so good that Winslet told Cameron that, even if he didn’t hire her, he should hire the “Basketball Diaries” actor.
    7. Actually, it was DiCaprio who needed to be sold on the filmmakers behind what was to be his first mainstream, big-budget Hollywood movie. He kept trying to suggest changes to Jack to make the part more interesting to play, until Cameron balked and said, “Look, I’m not going to make this guy brooding and neurotic. I’m not going to give him a tic and a limp and all the things you want.” DiCaprio relented and signed on.

    8. The most remarkable bit of casting may have been the older Rose. Gloria Stuart had been a promising Hollywood starlet in the 1930s, acting in such films as ‘The Invisible Man” and “Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm.” She’d quit the movies in the 1940s and had worked for decades as a visual artist. She’d begun acting again in her sixties in small character parts, but she was all but retired by the time Cameron cast her, at age 85, to play the centenarian Rose.
    9. Cameron had considered trying to lure her contemporary, original “King Kong” star Fay Wray, out of retirement to play Rose before selecting Stuart. Her Oscar-nominated comeback made her famous for the rest of her life. Stuart died in 2010 at age 100, about the same age as her “Titanic” character.

    10. Cameron’s drive for accuracy included no fewer than 12 dives to the wreck site during the production, on occasion bringing set and costume designers along. To recreate the Titanic, he obtained the original blueprints. His production designer discovered that the company that had manufactured the ship’s carpets was still in business and commissioned the firm to duplicate them for the movie.
    11. In the scene where Jack sketches a nude Rose, the actors’ visible nervousness was real. After all, it was the first scene DiCaprio and Winslet shot together. The portrait was actually drawn by Cameron.

    12. Three weeks into the shoot, members of the cast and crew suffered a weird bout of food poisoning, tripping on lobster chowder that had been laced with PCP. Who spiked the soup with angel dust? That’s one of the enduring mysteries of “Titanic.”
    13. Cameron got Fox to build a water tank in Rosarito, Mexico (above), one that could hold 17 million gallons of water. In the tank, Cameron staged much of the action aboard a 770-foot-long scale model, about 90 percent the size of the actual Titanic.

    14. Of course, many scenes recreating the ship — particularly during the sinking — were achieved with digital trickery, though there were only about 500 effects shots in the film, a modest number by the standard of today’s CGI extravaganzas.
    15. During the final plunge of the ship’s stern, where hapless passengers and crew are shown tumbling and bouncing around the deck, three stuntmen suffered broken bones. That’s not unusual for an action-heavy production as big as “Titanic,” but reports of the injuries, along with the director’s hot-tempered defiance of Fox’s efforts to cut expensive scenes, led to rumors in Hollywood that Cameron and his movie were out of control.

    16. Still, Cameron did save the production millions by giving up his director’s fee. He also gave up his percentage of the profit, a gesture Fox found hollow because it didn’t expect the film to go into the black. Cameron did, however, keep his seven-figure fee for writing the screenplay.
    17. The film’s running time is three hours and 15 minutes, or about 35 minutes longer than it took the actual Titanic to sink.

    18. “Titanic” cost $200 million to make, a figure that was double the amount originally budgeted, an unprecedented amount to spend shooting a movie back in 1997, and a sum so high that 20th Century Fox had to bring Paramount aboard as a financing partner.
    19. That cost (nearly 27 times the $7.5 million spent to build the actual ship in 1912), reports of turmoil from the set, and production delays that pushed the release from July to Christmas 1997, led to all the ominous buzz about the film’s abysmal prospects. Even Fox studio chief Peter Chernin told the Los Angeles Times he thought the studio would be lucky just to break even.

    20. Of course, the film ended up with an unprecedented box office haul as well, some $601 million in North America and $1.5 billion abroad. Even so, Hollywood bean-counters at the time didn’t think Cameron’s seafaring success would launch a wave of similarly costly blockbusters. As one producer told the Times, “All people did for a year in this town was sweat ‘Titanic.’ I think ‘Titanic’s’ cost will make people look more carefully at the cost of a movie.” Today, with studios routinely spending $200 to $300 million on franchise installments, such optimism about Hollywood’s fiscal discipline sounds wistfully naive.
    21. “Titanic” tied some Oscar records. It shares with “All About Eve” the record for the most nominations (14) and with fellow Best Picture winners “Ben-Hur” and “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” the record for the most trophies won (11).

    22. The ceremony became famous as the one where Best Director winner Cameron quoted his own screenplay and shouted, “I’m the king of the world!” “Titanic” also won for editing, cinematography, production design, costumes, sound, sound editing, visual effects, James Horner‘s instrumental score, and the song “My Heart Will Go On.”
    23. At 86, Stuart was the oldest actor ever nominated for Oscar. She grumbled that she might have beaten “L.A. Confidential” star Kim Basinger for Best Supporting Actress, had not Cameron left so much of her performance on the cutting-room floor. Winslet was also nominated, for Best Actress, but lost to Helen Hunt (“As Good As It Gets”). DiCaprio wasn’t even nominated.

    24. A decade after “Titanic,” Winslet and DiCaprio reunited to play an unhappily married couple in “Revolutionary Road,” which neither critics nor audiences much cared for. Today, they’re still pals, and Winslet says they still crack each other up by quoting “Titanic” dialogue to each other.
    25. According to the 2017 National Geographic documentary “Titanic: 20 Years Later with James Cameron,” the obsessive filmmaker has made 33 dives to the wreck site in the two decades since the film’s release, investigating to see what he got right on screen and what he didn’t. His biggest mistake may have been his depiction of the way the stern went down after the ship broke in half. Using a bathtub-size scale model designed by naval engineers and his own special effects team — and sinking the model dozens of times — Cameron now believes the stern rose vertically only once, not twice.

    26. Cameron says he also regrets not being more sensitive to the descendants of the survivors, particularly those of crewman William Murdoch (Ewan Stewart), whom “Titanic” depicted as a gun-wielding villain, without any basis in historical fact.

  • ‘Titanic,’ ‘Goonies,’ ‘Die Hard’ Among 2017 National Film Registry Selections

    The Library of Congress announced on Wednesday its annual additions to the National Film Registry, which preserves films of historic, cultural, and aesthetic importance. And like previous classes of inductees, the 25 pictures included this year are an eclectic bunch featuring Hollywood classics, recent critical darlings, and beloved children’s flicks, among many others.

    Among the highlights of the 2017 group are Oscar-winning blockbuster “Titanic,” Disney animated classic “Dumbo,” and audience favorite ’80s flicks “Die Hard,” “The Goonies,” and “Field of Dreams.” The 1978 version of “Superman,” WWII drama “Gentleman’s Agreement,” Christopher Nolan thriller “Memento,” and Katharine Hepburn-Spencer Tracy-Sidney Poitier classic “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” also made the cut.

    According to the official announcement from Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden, the 2017 selections span nearly 100 years of cinema, from 1905 to 2000. Their induction brings the National Film Registry’s total number of motion pictures to 725.

    “The selection of a film to the National Film Registry recognizes its importance to American cinema and the nation’s cultural and historical heritage,” said Hayden in a statement. “Our love affair with motion pictures is a testament to their enduring power to enlighten, inspire and inform us as individuals and a nation as a whole. Being tasked with selecting only 25 each year is daunting because there are so many great films deserving of this honor.”

    The full list of 2017 inductees, in alphabetical order, is below.

    Films Selected for the 2017 National Film Registry

    1. Ace in the Hole (aka Big Carnival) (1951)
    2. Boulevard Nights (1979)
    3. Die Hard (1988)
    4. Dumbo (1941)
    5. Field of Dreams (1989)
    6. 4 Little Girls (1997)
    7. Fuentes Family Home Movies Collection (1920s and 1930s)
    8. Gentleman’s Agreement (1947)
    9. The Goonies (1985)
    10. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967)
    11. He Who Gets Slapped (1924)
    12. Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street (1905)
    13. La Bamba (1987)
    14. Lives of Performers (1972)
    15. Memento (2000)
    16. Only Angels Have Wings (1939)
    17. The Sinking of the Lusitania (1918)
    18. Spartacus (1960)
    19. Superman (1978)
    20. Thelonious Monk: Straight, No Chaser (1988)
    21. Time and Dreams (1976)
    22. Titanic (1997)
    23. To Sleep with Anger (1990)
    24. Wanda (1971)
    25. With the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain (1937-1938)

    [via: Library of Congress]

  • ‘Titanic’ Child Star Says Kate Winslet Was Kept Away From Kids, for the Funniest Reason

    Sounds like Rose wasn’t always ladylike on the “Titanic” set.

    Reece P. Thompson III, now 25, played the “Little Irish Boy” in the 1997 film. You’ll remember him in a couple of scenes, including that truly heartbreaking one where his mother reads him and his sister a bedtime story as the ship goes down.

    Cosmopolitan talked to Thompson, who now works as a digital marketing director at a ski resort in Utah. He said, once people find out he was in “Titanic,” they usually want to know how much money he made (“I want to say around $30,000”) and if he got to meet stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet.

    Well, he did get to meet Leo. But not Kate.

    “I didn’t meet Kate Winslet. Apparently — I’m sure she’s a wonderful, sweet person — but apparently they had to keep her separate from the kids because she swore a lot. My mom met her and said that she was nice, but I never did.”

    Bollocks!

    That sounds so Kate Winslet, though. She was 21-years-old when filming the role that would earn her an Oscar nomination. Working in those tight clothes, with the notoriously tough James Cameron, we’d probably do a lot of cursing, too.

    Leo had his own issues with Cameron, as Thompson shared. One of his other scenes as the young boy was walking down a hall on the ship while everyone’s arriving, including Fabrizio (Danny Nucci) and Jack Dawson (DiCaprio). Cosmo asked what he remembered about that, and here’s his response:

    “My mom told me about this: We did that one countless times and it was because James Cameron was getting incredibly frustrated that Leonardo couldn’t walk down the hallway and say his lines at the same time.”

    Thompson said he wasn’t on set nearly as much as Leo, but they shared the same makeup room on the days when the young actor was on call.

    “And my mom told me that he was super friendly and making me laugh, making faces at me and stuff. Very small interaction.”

    Small, but sweet and memorable — at least for his mom.

    It has to be cool to have this experience in your past, even if it would be hard to remember the details at age 5. It’s staggering the number of people who have seen him on screen, even if they wouldn’t recognize him in real life now. At least his heart is still going on, 20 years later … unlike his character’s, or Jack’s, whether he could’ve fit on that door or not.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • 33 ’90s Movies You Have to Watch or We Can’t Be Friends

    33 ’90s Movies You Have to Watch or We Can’t Be Friends

  • Kate Winslet Just Revealed Her ‘Titanic’ Audition Partner and It Wasn’t Leo

    20 years later, fans can’t get enough of “Titanic.” And Kate Winslet just gave them a brand new bit of trivia to chew on.

    While appearing on “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” Thursday night to promote her new film, “Wonder Wheel,” she spilled the beans — for the first time ever in public, according to the Oscar-winning actress — on a secret about her audition for the James Cameron blockbuster. Her scene partner wasn’t Leo, it was Matthew McConaughey.

    “I auditioned with Matthew, isn’t that weird? Never said that in public before!” Winslet revealed, when asked about Paramount wanting the “Dallas Buyers Club” star over Leo for the role of Jack.

    Watch the interview below:While remarking that the audition with Mr. Alright, Alright, Alright was fantastic, Winslet knows that casting him would have obviously changed things, and that the movie we all love “would have been a totally different film.”

    Maybe she would have made room on that door for the McConaughey’s Jack, amirite?! (Sorry not sorry.)

    “Wonder Wheel” plays in select theaters now, and “Titanic” returns to theaters Dec. 1, 2017 for a one-week limited engagement celebrating its 20th anniversary.

  • James Cameron Still Insists ‘Titanic’ Door ‘Not Big Enough’ to Hold Both Jack & Rose

    Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet / Titanic / 1997Twenty years later, James Cameron is still responding to THAT “Titanic” question.

    “Titanic” came out in December 1997, so the 20th anniversary is this coming month. James Cameron remastered the blockbuster and he’s re-releasing it in theaters starting this Friday, Dec. 1. Vanity Fair talked to Cameron about the making of the film, and got him to address DoorGate (again):

    Vanity Fair: One question that people ask me a lot about Titanic, and I’m assuming they ask you this a lot, is at the end, why doesn’t Rose (Kate Winslet) make room for Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) on the door?

    James Cameron: And the answer is very simple because it says on page 147 [of the script] that Jack dies. Very simple. . . . Obviously it was an artistic choice, the thing was just big enough to hold her, and not big enough to hold him . . . I think it’s all kind of silly, really, that we’re having this discussion 20 years later. But it does show that the film was effective in making Jack so endearing to the audience that it hurts them to see him die. Had he lived, the ending of the film would have been meaningless. . . . The film is about death and separation; he had to die. So whether it was that, or whether a smoke stack fell on him, he was going down. It’s called art, things happen for artistic reasons, not for physics reasons.

    Vanity Fair: Well, you’re usually such a stickler for physics . . .

    James Cameron: I am. I was in the water with the piece of wood putting people on it for about two days getting it exactly buoyant enough so that it would support one person with full free-board, meaning that she wasn’t immersed at all in the 28 degree water so that she could survive the three hours it took until the rescue ship got there. [Jack] didn’t know that she was gonna get picked up by a lifeboat an hour later; he was dead anyway. And we very, very finely tuned it to be exactly what you see in the movie because I believed at the time, and still do, that that’s what it would have taken for one person to survive.

    Since Cameron is a tech-nerd, in a good way, it’s fitting that they pressed him on the “physics” of survival for two people. It is a valid question. Fans have been thought for years that there was room for two. There have been re-enactments to test the theory and everything. (“Game of Thrones” fans also referenced the scene during a battle last season.) But Cameron insists — for both art and science — Jack had to die.

    Sorry, Jack.

    But since Jack said to “never let go,” you can rest assured fans will still cling to the idea that he could’ve lived.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Titanic’ Returning to Theaters to Mark 20th Anniversary

    Near, far, wherever you are — you’ll have a chance to see “Titanic” in theaters.

    To mark its 20th anniversary, the romantic epic will return to the big screen, in both 2D and 3D, for one week at select AMC theaters starting December 1.

    Director James Cameron announced the news in a special video on Twitter. “It was like seeing it for the first time,” he says of viewing his film in Dolby Vision, adding, “‘Titanic’ has never looked better.”

    Fans can once again watch Leonardo DiCaprio’s Jack and Kate Winslet’s Rose meet and fall in love on board the infamous ship, which sank in the icy waters of the North Atlantic Ocean on April 14, 1912. No doubt the re-release will stir up the debate about whether both Rose and Jack could’ve fit on the wooden door. And of course, Celine Dion’s “My Heart Will Go On” should be played on repeat as preparation.

    Tickets go on sale November 15.

  • Kate Winslet Joins ‘Avatar’ Sequels for ‘Titanic’ Reunion With James Cameron

    Director James Cameron(C) and actress Kate WinsletNow please sign Leonardo DiCaprio so our ’90s hearts can go on and on.

    Kate Winslet is following her “Titanic” director James Cameron into the “Avatar” world, Deadline reports, despite Winslet and Cameron maybe not having the best relationship when they made that other top-grossing film. No matter. It’s been since 1997 so time probably healed any wounds.

    Winslet will star as someone called Ronal in the “Avatar” sequels — it’s not clear how many.

    “Kate and I have been looking for something to do together for 20 years, since our collaboration on ‘Titanic,’ which was one of the most rewarding of my career,” Cameron said, via Deadline. “I can’t wait to see her bring the character of Ronal to life.”

    The first “Avatar” film came out in 2009 and became the highest-grossing movie of all time. There are four “Avatar” movies now in production, at a cost of $1 billion. Fans recently got a first look at the young “Avatar 2” stars who’ll be playing Jake Sully’s (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri’s (Zoe Saldana) children, along with kids from another Na’vi clan.

    “Avatar 2” is scheduled for release on Dec. 18, 2020. “Avatar 3” will come out in 2021, followed by “Avatar 4” in 2024, and “Avatar 5” in 2025. Let’s hope the world survives that long!

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.