Tag: universal

  • ‘Girls Trip’ First Look: Watch Queen Latifah Get Up to Crazy Antics in the Big Easy

    Buckle up: Four friends are not messing around when the hit the Big Easy in “Girls Trip.”

    Universal Pictures has unveiled an announcement video, and the first look shows off stars Queen Latifah, Regina Hall, Jada Pinkett Smith, and Tiffany Hall as they rediscover their wild sides on a trip to New Orleans for the Essence Festival. After not spending enough time together for five years, they’re ready to make up for lost time. That means zip-ling across Bourbon Street balconies, getting “white-girl wasted,” and surrounding themselves in the scent of “Hennessy and booty sweat.”

    We’ll get to see more in the coming months, but in the meantime, check out the first look below.

    The comedy is directed by Malcom D. Lee, who previously worked on The Best Man films and “Barbershop: The Next Cut.” The cast also includes Mike Colter, Kofi Siriboe, and Larenz Tate.

    “Girls Trip” is due out on July 21.

  • The ‘A Dog’s Purpose’ Premiere Has Been Canceled Amid Controversy

    a dog's purpose, premiere, canceled, cancelled, controversy, video, boycottControversy erupted earlier this week when video from the set of upcoming feel-good flick “A Dog’s Purpose” surfaced online, purportedly showing a terrified German shepherd that was forced to perform a stunt against its will. Thanks to the immense backlash the video unleashed, Universal has decided to cancel this weekend’s Hollywood premiere of the film.

    In a statement, Universal and production company Amblin cited investigation into the video as the main reason for the cancellation (which also includes the film’s press junket), noting that they did not want the film to be overshadowed by the negative attention. Here’s the full statement:

    “Because Amblin’s review into the edited video released yesterday is still ongoing, distributor Universal Pictures has decided it is in the best interest of A Dog’s Purpose to cancel this weekend’s premiere and press junket. Amblin and Universal do not want anything to overshadow this film that celebrates the relationship between humans and animals.

    “Since the emergence of the footage, Amblin has engaged with many associated with the production of the film, including safety personnel, trainers and stunt coordinators as part of their in-depth review. While we are all disheartened by the appearance of an animal in distress, everyone has assured us that Hercules the German Shepherd was not harmed throughout the filmmaking.”

    According to The Hollywood Reporter, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — which has already called for a boycott of the film — is now “pushing for further action, calling on the director of the Amblin production, Lasse Hallstrom, and producer Gavin Polone to pledge never to use animals in films again and to rescue the dogs from Birds & Animals Unlimited, the training and handling facility said to be the provider of the canines.” (PETA recently opened its own investigation into BAU, alleging the company ignored or in some cases actively participated in the abuse and neglect of animals used in high-profile films, including the “Harry Potter” series. BAU has denied any wrongdoing.)

    In response to PETA’s demand, Polone — described by THR as “A prominent Hollywood vegan and animal rights activist” — told the trade that he found the request ridiculous, noting, “This is a movie about promoting the idea of animals as sentient and deserving of empathy and rights.” Instead of giving up the use of real animals entirely, the producer offered a different solution, per THR:

    “What’s needed is a replacement for the [American Humane Association],” the non-profit monitoring group financed by producers that’s tasked with on-set animal oversight. (It’s known for its “No Animals Were Harmed” accreditation [and was also the subject of a scathing 2013 THR investigation that uncovered widespread failures and cover-ups in the organization; the AHA has denied the claims].) He continued, “There’s a person there all the time and clearly they are ineffective. That’s the issue and that’s what needs to be corrected.”

    For its part, PETA has written to the AHA to ask for a complete copy of a report that the monitoring group claimed on Wednesday it had initiated as soon as it saw the footage, bringing in an independent investigator to spearhead. (It also placed the on-set AHA safety representative on administrative leave.) “We’re hearing that the monitor did not report [the incident] to her supervisors but the AHA gave the movie an acceptable rating anyway,” says Lange. “We don’t know if that is true, but we’re asking.”

    “A Dog’s Purpose” is schedule for wide release on January 27.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

  • ‘Ride Along 3’ Is in the Works, Ice Cube and Kevin Hart to Return

    After the success of the first two installments, Universal is staying in the “Ride Along” business, ordering up a second sequel to hit 2014 film.

    Variety reports that the studio is currently developing “Ride Along 3,” which will once again reunite stars Ice Cube and Kevin Hart. The duo star as mismatched brothers-in-law who take the titular ride in Cube’s police car in the first film, then team up again to take down a crime lord in the sequel.

    There’s no word yet on the plot for the third entry in the franchise, though screenwriting duo Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi — who also wrote the first two films — are once again penning the script. Director Tim Story is also returning.

    Though the “Ride Along” series has seen diminishing returns at the box office, it’s still a proven hit for Universal, with the first flick grossing $153 million worldwide back in 2014 on a $25 million budget. “Ride Along 2” — which was actually greenlit before the first film even premiered, based off the positive buzz it generated ahead of its release — hit theaters back in January of this year, and made $124 million worldwide.

    No word yet on when “Ride Along 3” may be slated for release, though Variety notes that the project is still in early development. Stay tuned.

    [via: Variety]

  • Javier Bardem May Star in Universal’s ‘Frankenstein’ Reboot

    FRANCE-CANNES-FILM-FESTIVAL-ENTERTAINMENTFollowing in the shoes of fellow superstar Tom Cruise, Oscar winner Javier Bardem may be joining Universal’s upcoming monster movie reboot franchise as the star of a Frankenstein flick.

    The intel comes from Variety, which reports that Bardem is now producers’ top choice to appear as Frankenstein in Universal’s new monsterverse. It’s a bit unclear from the trade’s report whether Bardem is being eyed to play Dr. Frankenstein (the monster’s creator) or the monster himself (known simply as Frankenstein’s monster, though he’s often mistakenly referred to as Frankenstein, too). Based on Bardem’s talent, it seems likely he’s circling the part of the doctor, though we won’t know anything officially until Universal comments on the casting.

    Regardless of just who he’s playing, Bardem’s participation would add yet another familiar face to the reboot roster. In addition to Cruise, who’s starring in “The Mummy,” Universal has also secured Russell Crowe (who’s co-starring with Cruise) and Johnny Depp (the Invisible Man, set for a standalone feature) for its upcoming slate. The plan is for the actor to eventually star in his own standalone feature, “The Bride of Frankenstein,” but he’ll first be introduced in another TBA monster movie, per the trade.

    “The Mummy” is due in theaters June 9, 2017. A second monster movie is slated for April 13, 2018, and a third is scheduled for February 15, 2019.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: AFP/Getty Images

    %Slideshow-2931%

  • ‘Wicked’ Movie (Finally) Gets 2019 Release Date

    58th Annual Tony Awards - ShowMore than 12 years after it hit Broadway, a movie version of the musical smash “Wicked” is finally coming to the big screen, and has an official release date.

    Studio Universal announced on Thursday that “Wicked” would hit movie theaters on December 20, 2019, a release date that’s right in the thick of awards season. And with the show’s success on Broadway — it won three Tonys in 2004, and has grossed more than $1 billion since its debut — producers of the flick likely have Oscar in their sights as well.

    The movie will be directed by Stephen Daldry (who’s been nominated for four Oscars, and won a Tony for directing the musical version of his film “Billy Elliot”), who joined the project way back in 2012. Producer Marc Platt, who also produced the stage version of “Wicked,” will return in that role as well.

    “Wicked” is based on the “Wizard of Oz” prequel novel “Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West” by Gregory Maguire, and was adapted for the stage by book writer Winnie Holzman and famed lyricist-composer Stephen Schwartz (“Godspell,” “Pippin”), who took home a Tony for his work on the show. Holzman and and Schwartz will collaborate on the film’s screenplay.

    As for just who will star, Idina Menzel, who won the Best Actress Tony for playing Elphaba in the original Broadway production, admitted in an interview earlier this year that she was probably too old for the role now. Still, we’d love to see her and fellow star Kristin Chenoweth pop up in the production in some capacity. We’ll keep our fingers crossed.

    [via: Deadline]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-201932%

  • Tom Cruise May Star in ‘The Mummy’ Reboot; Universal Denies Report

    CHINA-ENTERTAINMENT-US-FILM-CRUISEUPDATE: According to Deadline, the news that Tom Cruise may be in negotiations to star in Universal’s upcoming reboot of “The Mummy” is false, with the site claiming that both the studio and the actor’s representatives are denying that report’s veracity.

    As we reported earlier, Variety had the scoop that Cruise was in talks to headline the new version of “The Mummy,” and help steer the studio’s grand plan to revive all of its classic monster movies. But rival trade Deadline is debunking that report, claiming, “Both Universal and the star’s people tell Deadline adamantly that no deal with Cruise is in the works for the film.”

    Of course, Deadline didn’t get either party to go on the record with those statements. (Universal declined to comment on Variety’s story.) But the site says that Cruise is simply too busy to take the part — whatever it may be — citing his busy schedule filming the next “Jack Reacher” movie and “Mission: Impossible 6,” which is slated to start production next August.

    In our original report — which you can read in full below — we noted that Cruise’s transition into monster movies would be a bit of a departure for the actor. But, stranger things have happened. It seems unlikely that this particular scenario will pan out, but we’ll wait until Universal says something on the record until we know for sure. Stay tuned.

    ORIGINAL REPORT:

    Today in crazy casting news: Tom Cruise is reportedly in talks to star in the upcoming reboot of “The Mummy.”

    That potential unlikely marriage of mega-star and monster movie comes via a report from Variety, which says that Cruise is currently negotiating to take a lead role in the reboot. Cruise won’t produce the film, Variety says, but “will play a major part in development.”

    According to the trade, that development includes a master plan from Universal that will take a cue from the Marvel comics flicks, and involve all of the studio’s classic monsters, including Frankenstein, Dracula, and the Wolf Man, among others. “Characters from the monster universe films are expected to crop up in each other’s installments before culminating in an ‘Avengers’-style tie-in film,” per Variety’s report.

    The trade also notes that Cruise’s “Mummy” film will be unrelated to the previous, most recent “Mummy” flicks starring Brendan Fraser, which were all set in the past. The reboot will reportedly take place in the present day.

    Universal declined to comment on Variety’s scoop, though if true, this could introduce Cruise to a whole new generation of fans — not to mention genre fans. It’s an odd mashup, but an intriguing one. We’ll have to see if this plan pans out.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: AFP/Getty Images

    %Slideshow-307863%

  • ‘Fast and Furious’ Spinoffs and Prequels Are in the Works

    Premiere Of Universal Pictures' "Furious 7" - Red CarpetFollowing the jaw-dropping, chart-topping, global success of “Furious 7,” Universal is considering a Disney/Marvel-style treatment for that franchise, with discussions of possible spinoff and prequel films currently taking place.

    In a new report from Variety, star Vin Diesel explains that even after the planned 10-film series comes to a close, there’s still plenty of potential for more stories to be told in the “Fast and Furious” world.

    “We’ve written out story lines for various characters,” Diesel told the trade. “We’ve been playing with it for a long time. It’s a very rich property and we’re committed to treating it with a lot of class.”

    Universal Pictures Chairman Donna Langley confirmed that plan, telling Variety that the studio wanted to “broaden the series’ reach.”

    “We’re certainly in conversations about how we can expand the franchise now,” Langley said. “It’s an ensemble cast and there’s room to bring characters in and out.”

    Universal will have plenty of time to plan for the next phase of the “Fast” brand, though, since the studio is still committed to the recently-announced new trilogy of films that will bring the total of “Fast” flicks to 10. But according to one studio exec, the original series may not stop there, either.

    “Vin has a vision in his mind for three more, so let’s get three more done and then see where we are from there,” said Jeff Shell, chairman of Universal Filmed Entertainment Group, in an interview with Variety. “Everything has an end, so I don’t think our expectation is we’re going to have a hundred of them…To me ‘Fast and Furious’ has become no different than a beloved series that comes on every year. “

    Only time will tell if fans will keep revving up for more “Fast” flicks, but it seems Universal is going to send them out to the races for the foreseeable future no matter what.

    Fast and Furious 8,” directed by F. Gary Gray, is due in theaters on April 14, 2017. Expect more where that came from.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-275269%

  • Vin Diesel Says a New ‘Fast & Furious’ Trilogy Will End the Series

    Premiere Of Universal Pictures' "Furious 7" - ArrivalsThere may not be a director yet for “Furious 8,” but according to star Vin Diesel, there are still some big things in store for the franchise.

    Diesel took to his Facebook page on Friday to announce that not only is he hard at work on helping develop the eighth flick in the franchise, but that the series (or in his words, “SAGA”) would continue for a new trilogy, before wrapping up with a 10th film. Those ambitious plans are the reason, according to Diesel, that “Furious 8” doesn’t have a director yet, refuting claims that multiple people have turned down the job, thanks in part to his own difficulty during the production of “Furious 7.” (Studio Universal has also denied those claims.)

    In his Facebook post last week, Diesel indicated that he had huge influence in selecting a director for not only “Furious 8,” but the next two films as well, and the actor said he was working closely with producer Neal Moritz and Universal to decide who would helm each installment of this new trilogy. Diesel then promised that his next post would reveal those directors, though when he updated his page again on Sunday, there was still no progress on that front; instead, Diesel thanked fans for their patience with the process, and for their loyalty to the series.

    The fans of the Fast & Furious SAGA are the best fans in the world… Since I became the Producer in 2008, you have been…

    Posted by Vin Diesel on Friday, September 25, 2015

    All weekend long, my producing partner Neal, the Studio and myself have been mapping out the future of our SAGA… All…

    Posted by Vin Diesel on Sunday, September 27, 2015

    As ScreenCrush notes, a trajectory for three more “Furious” flicks would likely mean that “Fast & Furious 10” would come out around 2021, and locking in directors for a project so far in advance is uncommon. But could Diesel be plotting to direct one (or all) of the movies himself? The rumor mill certainly thinks he’s gunning for the job, and fans on his Facebook page apparently want to see it happen, too.

    We’ll have to wait and see how this shakes out in the coming weeks and months. But we can guarantee that Diesel will have plenty to say about it, regardless of what happens.

    [via: Vin Diesel, h/t Screen Crush]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-275086%

  • A King Kong vs. Godzilla Mashup Movie May Be in the Works

    GodzillaAn interesting new report from Deadline suggests that two legendary monster movie properties may be gearing up for an epic onscreen showdown.

    vT80cvt4MpEl6lfHxZ16w6

    According to the trade, former Universal property “Kong: Skull Island” has recently switched studios and moved to Warner Bros. While that in and of itself isn’t all that interesting — in-development films can change studios at any time, especially before the cameras roll — what makes the move significant is that Warner Bros. is the current studio behind the “Godzilla” franchise. Could this mean that a King Kong vs. Godzilla flick is on the horizon?

    Deadline’s report emphatically suggests so, stating that the switch was made specifically to “unite the property with [production company] Legendary’s other giant franchise, ‘Godzilla.’” And furthermore, Deadline says, that makes way for “the ‘Godzilla’ sequel that is in the works [to] be followed by a movie that pits the giant ape versus the giant fire breathing reptile.”

    Considering how high interest in both creatures is right now — both properties were long-dormant in Hollywood before the announcement of “Skull Island,” and 2014’s “Godzilla” subsequently roared new life into that franchise — this move makes sense. There’s no set timeline on this just yet, and “Godzilla 2” isn’t due to hit theaters until at least 2018, so we’ll have to wait a while before this is confirmed.

    But the possibility is intriguing and exciting, and immediately brings to mind the classic “Godzilla” flicks of the 1960s, when the titular beast battled a host of other giant creatures like Mothra (who is slated to appear in “Godzilla 2”). Kong is certainly more iconic, though, and this could be a truly spectacular battle. Keep your fingers crossed, and stay tuned.

    [via: Deadline]

  • Summer Box Office 2015: Winners and Losers

    This weekend, “Straight Outta Compton” enjoyed a three-peat atop the box office chart, easily defeating three new wide releases. Which means that the end of summer is, sadly, finally here. So it’s time to assess what will probably be Hollywood’s most lucrative summer ever. Here are the winners and losers of the season.

    Winner: The Overall Domestic Box Office

    As of Sunday, the total summer take stands at $4.72 billion. That’s up 14 percent from last year at this time, and slightly ahead of the $4.63 billion earned by August 30 of 2013, the previous record-holding summer.

    Loser: Movie Stars

    Arguably, only one of the summer’s top 10 movies (Tom Cruise’s “Mission: Impossible: Rogue Nation”) depended a lot on star power to sell tickets. The rest (including “Jurassic World,” “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” “Minions,” “Pitch Perfect 2,” “Ant-Man,” “Mad Max: Fury Road,” and “Straight Outta Compton”) were sold based on their ensemble casts or their premises. Meanwhile, stars like George Clooney (“Tomorrowland”), Bradley Cooper and Emma Stone (“Aloha”), Mark Wahlberg (“Ted 2”), Adam Sandler (“Pixels”), Channing Tatum (“Magic Mike XXL”), Reese Witherspoon (“Hot Pursuit”), and Meryl Streep (“Ricki and the Flash”) found they weren’t big enough draws to sell tickets to movies that viewers didn’t otherwise care about.

    Winner: Strong Female Characters
    Yes, more overt girl-power movies did well this summer (“Pitch Perfect 2,” “Inside Out”), but so did the ones that wrapped female-empowerment ideas inside more traditionally masculine genre conventions. Think of Charlize Theron’s Furiosa essentially stealing “Mad Max: Fury Road” from its ostensible hero. Or Melissa McCarthy proving she could be a butt-kicking secret agent and not just a buffoon in “Spy.” Or Sandra Bullock’s women-can-be-lovable-supervillains-too performance in “Minions.” Or Amy Schumer, proving that even a woman with a history of self-sabotaging life choices can be a romantic comedy heroine worthy of love in “Trainwreck.” Or spy Rebecca Ferguson, whose character subverts the genre’s “damsel in distress” conventions by saving the hero from peril at least twice in the film, while also operating on the same level as Ethan Hunt in terms of tradecraft. She even takes care to remove her high heels (unlike Bryce Dallas Howard in “Jurassic World”) whenever she engages in action-movie feats.

    Loser: Lazy Feminism

    By which I mean movies that seemed to be empowering to women but were marred by lackluster writing and poor execution. (We’re looking at you, “Hot Pursuit.”) “Magic Mike XXL” was supposed to be eye candy for the female gaze, but unlike the first “Magic Mike,” the story lacked some cohesion, and it was hard to care about the characters. A more cynical pundit might conclude that female-driven movies won’t achieve true parity with male-driven ones until they can be just as lazy and poorly made and still succeed at the box office, the way half-assed guy flicks often do. But it’s actually a good sign that moviegoers have discerning tastes and are forcing filmmakers to up their game.

    Winner: Nostalgia, Especially for DinosaursReboots, remakes, and sequels worked, but only for those projects harkening back to a very specific window in time, from about 1988 to 2001. So, that encompasses “Jurassic World” (essentially a sequel to 1993’s “Jurassic Park” that urged audiences to forget the previous two sequels), “Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation” (best thought of as a continuation of the franchise Tom Cruise launched in 1996, not as a follow-up to the very different 1960s TV spy series), spring holdover “Furious 7” (sequel to a franchise dating back to 2001), and “Straight Outta Compton” (biopic of rappers whose heyday was from 1988-91).

    “Mad Max: Fury Road” seems like an outlier, since it’s the sequel to a series whose last installment came out in 1985, but the movie so thoroughly revised and reinvented the franchise that it seems nostalgia was hardly a factor in its success, unless it’s nostalgia for a pre-CGI era of action filmmaking.

    Loser: Nostalgia for All Other Things

    Movies that tried to resurrect titles from before 1988 — notably, “Vacation” (a near-remake of the 1983 franchise launcher), “Poltergeist” (a remake of the 1982 movie), “Pixels” (inspired by early 1980s video games), and “The Man From UNCLE” (based on a nearly forgotten TV spy series from the 1960s) — failed. So did movies drawing upon more recent fare: “Terminator: Genisys,” “Entourage” (based on the HBO series that launched in 2004), “Fantastic Four” (a reboot of a franchise last launched just 10 years ago, in 2005), and “Hitman: Agent 47” (reboot of a franchise that wasn’t even a hit the first time, in 2007).

    There’s also the curious case of “Tomrorrowland,” which, despite its forward-looking title, was also a nostalgic throwback to the shiny, space-age, Sputnik-era utopian futurism of 1950s sci-fi, “The Jetsons,” and the Disney theme park attraction that gave the movie its title.

    Winner: Jason Blum

    The low-budget horror producer spent about $20 million total to make “Insidious Chapter 3,” “The Gallows,” and “Sinister 2,” but he earned back $165 million worldwide. “The Gallows,” whose reported budget was an absurdly meager $100,000, earned back $38 million around the world, making it the most profitable movie of the summer — and probably the last several years.

    Loser: John Green

    Last summer’s “The Fault in Our Stars” seemed to launch Green as a new one-man young-adult novels-to-movies franchise. But with the Shailene Woodley-free “Paper Towns,” lightning failed to strike twice. Also a flop: faux-John Green, in the form of Sundance hit “Me and Earl and the Dying Girl.”

    Winner: The Marvel Cinematic Universe
    The “Avengers” sequel wasn’t as big as the 2012 original, but it was still the second biggest movie of the summer, with $457.5 million domestic and a total of $1.4 billion worldwide. “Ant-Man” was the summer’s seventh-biggest movie, with $169.2 million here and another $196.5 million abroad.

    Loser: Other Marvel

    Fox’s “Fantastic Four” is proof that maybe only Marvel should do Marvel. Apparently, ticketbuyers can smell the difference between Disney’s M.C.U. movies and everybody else’s Marvel pictures.

    Winners: Universal and Disney

    Universal had the summer’s top movie (“Jurassic World,” which grossed $643.1 million at home), four of its top 10 films (the others were “Minions,” “Pitch Perfect 2,” and “Straight Outta Compton”), and six of its top 15 (including “Trainwreck” and even underperformer “Ted 2”). It’s boasted a 28 percent market share this summer, suggesting that more than one out of every four tickets sold went to a Universal movie. No studio has dominated the box office like that since Disney in 1999.

    Disney, of course, had a very good summer as well, with its two Marvel movies, Pixar’s “Inside Out” (the summer’s third biggest movie), and even “Tomorrowland” ending up in the top 15.

    Losers: All Other Studios

    Sony in particular took it on the chin with “Aloha,” “Pixels,” and “Ricki and the Flash.” Paramount had only “Rogue Nation” and “Terminator: Genisys” this summer. Fox succeeded with “Spy,” but stumbled with “Paper Towns,” “Fantastic Four,” and “Hitman: Agent 47.” Warner Bros. boasted top 10 finishers “San Andreas” and “Mad Max: Fury Road,” but also underwhelming “Magic Mike XXL” and duds “Hot Pursuit,” “The Man from UNCLE,” and “Entourage.”

    Winner: Underserved Audiences

    Key to Universal’s success this year has been a strategy of catering not just to young white male ticketbuyers, but to women, older viewers, and ethnically diverse viewers. And there are other underserved demographics also hungering for movies targeted toward them; witness the success of this weekend’s “War Room,” a film for Christian audiences that outperformed expectations by opening in second place with an estimated $11.0 million.

    Loser: Domestic Audiences

    Once again, foreign ticketbuyers saved the bacon of several movies that would have been flops if not for the international box office.

    “Terminator: Genisys” made less than $90 million here, but it earned an astonishing $320.1 million abroad. “Pixels” made just $71 million here, but $114.8 million in other countries. “Magic Mike XXL” grossed $65.8 million in North America, but foreign grosses pushed its worldwide total to a healthy $117.6 million. “Vacation” took in just $55 million here and a total of $81.5 million around the world.

    Even “Fantastic Four,” which eked out just $52.7 million here, took in nearly twice as much overseas, for a planetary total of $146.2 million. So, even those these movies were considered critical and commercial flops here, they all probably earned enough worldwide to generate further sequels. Thanks a lot, rest of the world.
    %Slideshow-314608%