Tag: @tvprogram:383260

  • ‘Westworld’ Season 2 Is Coming … But Possibly Not Till 2018

    HBO has made another “Westworld” fantasy come true: The premium network has renewed the sci-fi TV series for Season 2.

    The news came Monday, seven episodes into the 10-part first season, along with renewals for “Divorce” and “Insecure.” Fans of “Westworld” may have to be patient when it comes to the series’ sophomore season, though. Casey Bloys, HBO programming president, recently told The Hollywood Reporter that it could be “fall of 2017 or into ’18” before it arrives.

    “With ‘Westworld,’ because the production is such a big endeavor, I don’t exactly know when [it will premiere] yet,” said Bloys. “I can’t speculate other than to say it’ll either be ’17 or ’18. Probably more like ’18 … but we’re a year away so let’s see how it goes.”

    Whenever the show returns, we’ll have 10 more twisted and captivating episodes to watch. The series centers on a futuristic amusement park that lets visitors live out their fantasies — no matter how wild. Not surprisingly, the premise has proven controversial, but the show has attracted plenty of viewers nonetheless. In fact, “Westworld” has grossed an average of 11.7 million total viewers from its Oct. 2 debut until now.

    The wait for Season 2 may be long, but we still have three more episodes of “Westworld” Season 1 on the horizon, complete with the talent of Anthony Hopkins, Evan Rachel Wood, James Marsden, Thandie Newton, Jeffrey Wright, and Ed Harris.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

  • ‘Westworld’ Just Confirmed Big Fan Theory, But You’re Wrong About Others

    “What door?” is HBO’s new “Hold the door.”

    “Westworld” Season 1 confirmed one of the many theories out there in Episode 7, “Trompe L’Oeil,” whose trick of the eye title was put to good use on Bernard Lowe. However, actor Jeffrey Wright warned that no fans out there are 100 percent correct in their theories, so don’t gloat too hard yet.

    Toward the end of the November 13 episode, in a showdown orchestrated by mad genius Dr. Ford (Anthony Hopkins), Bernard led Theresa Cullen (Sidse Babett Knudsen) into a secret section of Ford’s old family home in the park. They went through a room Bernard couldn’t see on his own (“what door?”) so Ford could have Theresa stumble on plans that showed Bernard is a host, like Dolores, Maeve, and the others. Bernard was shown to be (not free) under Ford’s control, and the end scene showed Ford turn his back as Bernard was used as an assassin to kill his former lover.Many fans suspected Bernard was a host, despite his own memories of his late son. Those memories, a dream, started the episode, and maybe threw more fans off the scent before the big reveal.

    Jeffrey Wright talked more about the reveal to Entertainment Weekly. He agreed that Bernard being a host wasn’t an out-of-left-field shocker, it made sense. “It’s woven into the logic behind the relationship of the characters and it’s not done for any shock value. There are very specific reasons why he is synthetic. If fans weren’t at all aware, or didn’t have any suspicions, that would have been a disservice to them and undermine the quality of storytelling. But I will think they will be surprised and pleased by how it’s revealed.” We didn’t get to see Bernard react to what happened, and EW asked if that’s ahead. “Let’s see where we go. What clearly is also revealed is the extent of Ford’s power — his creativity and his malevolence. What we’ll further explore is his intent.”

    And here’s the part on more theories:

    Did you have any theories about the show along the way while making the series that turned out to be wrong?

    Oh yeah. Lisa and [showrunner Jonathan Nolan] are light years ahead of all of us. Much like the fans, we had theories about where the show was heading and how certain things would be resolved and none of us batted 1.000 on that — and should say that there are no fans out there who are batting 1.000 either.

    Interesting, so you’ve been keeping half an eye on the fan theories?

    Yeah, sure, it’s great storytelling.

    Wright also said he thinks “fans will be gratified” by what’s ahead, whether they guess what’s coming or not. So keep that in mind. There are 10 episodes to Season 1, with “Westworld” Season 1, Episode 8, “Trade Decay” airing next Sunday, November 20 at 9 p.m. on HBO.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • How Thandie Newton Built ‘Westworld’ Madam Maeve Millay

    Thandie Newton in HBO's WESTWORLDSuddenly, Maeve Millay (Westworld’s” biggest wild card.

    With her awareness of exactly who and what she is outside of the context of her Old West fantasy setting amped up to 11 — or 20, in Westworld’s techie terms — Maeve is now a major force to be reckoned with inside the real-world environment, ready to work an agenda that can only be guessed at. As Maeve’s evolution unfolds, actress Thandie Newton shared with Moviefone the behind-the-scenes secrets of how she assembled her android agent provocateur — the voice, that steely glare, that skimpy frontier lingerie — from the ground up.

    Moviefone: What an acting challenge to play a synthetic being who is only just discovering that they have feelings and memories and such. Where did you start to figure out how to come at this?

    Thandie Newton: Well, our showrunners gave me the broad arc of where the story was going for my character, and it was really ambitious and fascinating, but they were just the broad strokes. So, from episode to episode, I wouldn’t necessarily know what was going to happen next. And it is, in retrospect, an absolute feat that they managed to oversee our work, knowing what was going to come, because if I’d had to figure out for myself, knowing everything I was going to have to do, it would have seemed like an impossible task, really and truly. I look back at the first episode and think if I had known then what I know now …

    Of course, I could have known everything and figured it out, but it was actually a really fantastic sort of layering of traits of the character which were completely led by the script. And, in terms of the physicality of the character, yes, there were many conversations about what kind of movement are we talking about. And, obviously all the people playing hosts, there needs to be similarities to our core behavior so that you can relate to all of them, or maybe identify with them before even, you know? And they wanted us to achieve full human naturalness.

    So it’s actually funny, because I assumed that playing in artificial intelligence, playing a robot, I would need to do some kind of robotics, but it was the opposite there. I actually had to be as perfectly human as I could be. In fact, I had to be the best version of being human, because that was the point to us.

    And as a human being, we’re programmed in terms of the influences that we receive as children, the education we receive — we’re made up of all of the different programs from outside, some random, some specific. And someone who is dealing with trauma in childhood, let’s say for an example, you can be, you can take out that program and decide that you want to behave differently than having panic attacks every five seconds. So that that would also inform the way I saw her.

    And what’s so glorious about playing this artificially intelligent woman is that I actually got to be the best version of being a human. Physically, with my voice, because everything was so definite, and still and controlled, and unfussed by anything. You see this one scene where there’s mayhem going on in the saloon, and she just stays completely calm because she’s only interested in what’s important to her. If we could all be like that, it would be amazing, right?

    So that alone was an interesting comment on being a human being, and I’ve carried stuff with me. Whether it’s meditation or yoga, achieving a state of enlightenment is something that I think about. I don’t practice enough, obviously, but it’s something that I’m fascinated by and there is this sense that the robots are more impressively human than humans themselves.

    On top of all those sort of heady acting challenges, you get to dress up as a woman who worked in a bordello. Tell me the fun, visceral side of performing in an Old West past, because, like the robots being more human than humans, she’s more madam than the madams in the way she’s designed.

    Absolutely. Well, you know, I took my inspiration from some of the greats, you know: Julie Christie in “McCabe and Mrs. Miller,” Claudia Cardinale in Sergio Leone‘s movies. Oh, it was fun looking at all of that stuff, because the Western is invented. It’s not real. The whole man on the horse, Marlboro Man with the hat and the machismo run wild, and savages, and all that horrifying nonsense.

    But it was fun because I knew we were going to be subverting it, and that it wouldn’t be these awful gender stereotypes and objectification of women, and exploitation of women, and precisely the reason we had to present them in their full, untarnished grossness was because we were going to be commenting on it, very quickly. I feel like that when I watch it. It’s like, “Oh, whoa, and then it’s like, OK, now let’s get into deconstructing all of this and commenting on it.”

    And so it was fun. Although, I’ve got to say I felt really exposed in that costume. I felt more exposed in that costume than I did naked, and I spend half the time naked on the show. Because I was very … just aware of the corset with the little waist, the ruffled skirt, and very short skirt, inviting a look with the garter that takes your eyes there so that you’re looking. I mean, it’s all created to elicit lust from the onlooker. And I felt very uncomfortable because that’s not the kind of attention I invite in my life, not the kind of attention I would suggest anyone invites into their life because it predisposes that that’s all a woman is really there for. Or a person is there for, if it’s a man that’s doing the same thing.

    So I really did feel uncomfortable wearing that outfit — I really, really did. I would actually wear a dressing gown over the top of it when I wasn’t shooting because if I was talking to crew members, who were so lovely and so respectful, they would just be looking at my breasts. And, funnily enough, at the time I was nursing — I was nursing my baby the whole way through the show, so it was even more inappropriate that I had boobs this high up, but that’s the whole point.

    So, I as Thandie was experiencing the wrongness in the same way that we hopefully will also have a sense of, at least as an option away from “Aw, that’s how you want to look as a woman, didn’t it feel good?” And she might say, “Yes, but with Westworld it’s going to be an option that you would think about it from a slightly different point of view,” and that’s valuable.

    Would you, minus technological glitches and moral conundrums, want to go into an immersive environment like Westworld? Would that be an interesting thing for you to do?

    No. I only like listening to music occasionally, because I’m aware that it’s not real. It’s not really happening right now, here. So the idea of going into a place that’s virtual — I don’t even like to go into shopping malls because I feel like it’s a further disconnection from life. The idea of going and spending a day, and we have shopping malls now that are like little cities, little towns, and you can have food, and there’s trees, and you can even feel like you’re sitting under the sun. Look, I’m just a scaredy-cat when it comes to that stuff. It might be really the only answer in our future, but no, I would so not.

    Although, I went to Six Flags recently with my daughter and had the best time. She taught me the trick of all tricks, which is just to close your eyes, and it worked, and I went on the rollercoasters with my kids and had a brilliant time. So, you know, maybe I should resist less.

    “Westworld” airs Sunday nights on HBO.

  • ‘Westworld’ Shocker Ahead May Make You Rewatch Whole Series

    Prepare to have your tinfoil-covered black or white cowboy hat blown off by what’s ahead on “Westworld” Season 1.

    Fans have already covered the Internet with their theories about … everything. Where Westworld and the staff are really located. Which humans might really be hosts. Which characters might be the same character in different timelines (you know that one). Whatever the heck is happening with co-founder Arnold, etc.A fan asked Entertainment Weekly for details on upcoming episodes of “Westworld” (the next is Episode 6, airing November 6) and here is the response:

    Do you know anything about the upcoming episodes of Westworld? — Candice
    Elsie comes very close to the truth behind those data leaks in Sunday’s episode, but having also seen next week’s outing, I will tell you first hand that there’s info even more surprising on the horizon. Let’s just say there’s something so shocking that happens next week, it left my jaw on the floor — seriously, I’m going to need to rewatch the entire series.

    Well, considering the “entire series” is only six episodes as of Sunday, it won’t take too long.The way that’s phrased makes it sound like “next week” means the November 13 Episode 7, called “Trompe L’Oeil.” That episode’s synopsis (see below) references Bernard considering his “next move.” Does something major happen with him? Is it revealed that (as some fans have theorized) that Bernard is a bot? The next episode after that references his “mandate,” then he and Dolores both “reconnect with their pasts.” Hmmm.

    HBO recently shared synopses for the upcoming episodes — except for the Episode 10 season finale. We just have the episode title for that one: “The Bicameral Mind.” Here are more details from HBO on what’s ahead:

    Episode #6: “The Adversary” (Sunday, November 6, 9 p.m. on HBO)

    Maeve (Thandie Newton) charms Lutz (Leonardo Nam); Elsie (Shannon Woodward) uncovers possible sabotage; the Man in Black (Ed Harris) and Teddy (James Marsden) run afoul of a garrison. Written by Halley Gross & Jonathan Nolan; directed by Frederick E.O. Toye.

    Episode #7: “Trompe L’Oeil” (November 13)

    Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood) and William (Jimmi Simpson) journey into treacherous terrain; Maeve (Thandie Newton) delivers an ultimatum; Bernard (Jeffrey Wright) considers his next move. Written by Halley Gross & Jonathan Nolan; directed by Frederick E.O. Toye.

    Episode #8: “Trace Decay” (November 20)

    Bernard (Jeffrey Wright) struggles with a mandate; Maeve (Thandie Newton) looks to change her script; Teddy (James Marsden) is jarred by dark memories. Written by Charles Yu & Lisa Joy; directed by Stephen Williams.

    Episode #9: “The Well-Tempered Clavier” (November 27)

    Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood) and Bernard (Jeffrey Wright) reconnect with their pasts; Maeve (Thandie Newton) makes a bold proposition to Hector (Rodrigo Santoro); Teddy (James Marsden) finds enlightenment, at a price. Written by Dan Dietz & Katherine Lingenfelter; directed by Michelle MacLaren.

    Episode #10: “The Bicameral Mind” (December 4)

    No description for the season finale yet, but it will probably be shocking … and make us rewatch the whole series.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Westworld’ Star Is ‘Just Flattered’ by Man in Black Theory

    Jimmi Simpson can neither confirm nor deny the popular “Westworld” theory out there about the Man in Black. You’ve probably heard the theory — that Simpson’s character, William, is a younger version of Ed Harris‘s Man in Black, and their scenes are from different timelines.

    Simpson talked to The Hollywood Reporter after Episode 4, and they openly asked him about the theory. Here’s part of their great Q&A:

    THR: By now, you must have heard about the theories that William is a younger version of the Man in Black.

    Jimmi Simpson: Oh, yeah.

    THR: What’s your take on the theory?

    Simpson: First of all, I’m just flattered, because that man is so badass. (Laughs.) Second of all, I can’t comment on anything. I wish I could say how wrong or right you are, but you guys have to wait just like we did.

    THR: You wouldn’t want to shut down the theorizing, anyway.

    Simpson: Exactly. Bring it on, because we literally all did this every time we got a script: “Oh my god! This is happening! She’s this, and she’s not this!” Then we were generally wrong, but sometimes, we were a shade right, and you would feel like a genius for somehow figuring out Jonah and Lisa’s brilliant puzzle.

    Jonah and Lisa are showrunners Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy. They, too, addressed fan theories and different timelines in a post-episode Q&A with Entertainment Weekly.

    EW: Should we not assume that everything seeing is taking place at the same time…?

    Jonathan Nolan: I think you want to assume as little as possible when watching this show. […] Part of the fun is people speculating about what they’re are seeing. There’s some amazing speculation out there. There are some theories that are so elaborate and beautiful that you wish you thought of them yourself. I think we want to burden the audience as little as possible with expectations of what we think the show is. I’m a big believer in this ever since we went to the Venice Film Festival with ‘Memento.’ My brother [director Christopher Nolan] gave an interview about what he thought the film meant but stressed it was ambiguous. And afterward we talked about it and I felt from then on that the best thing to do is get out of the way of the audience and let them play with it. And there are some things in ‘Westworld’ that are intentionally ambiguous.

    OK. Well. Then. As members of the audience, we have decided there are multiple timelines and William is indeed the young Man in Black. So far, it fits well enough. Maybe it won’t fit next week, but that’s another issue. Speaking of next week, Evan Rachel Wood (Dolores) and Ben Barnes (Logan) teased something noteworthy ahead in Episode 5.

    Here’s the Episode 5 promo:Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Evan Rachel Wood Drops Intriguing Tease for ‘Westworld’ Episode 5

    The “Westworld” hype train is now at full speed and we are definitely on board for the ride. HBO’s new sci-fi Western has us following every new theory like the Man in Black (Ed Harris) following clues to the maze. (But we’re skipping the scalping.)

    Episode 4 airs this Sunday, October 23, but we already have our eyes on Episode 5, thanks to Dolores herself, Evan Rachel Wood.

    Here’s her brief tease, echoed by Ben Barnes, who plays Logan, the black-hat wearing best friend of white hat guest William (Jimmi Simpson):

    That’s all they said. It’s not much, but the less we have implanted in our own minds, the better. Let the fans do the speculating. (And they certainly are speculating — from the theory that William is the younger version of the Man in Black, to the idea that maybe the Man in Black is park co-creator Arnold, and a dozen other theories in between.)

    All we know at this point is that Season 1, Episode 5 is titled “Contrapasso” and it will air Sunday, October 30. (A quick search informs us that Contrapasso is from the Latin contra and patior, “suffer the opposite,” referring to the punishment of souls in Dante’s Inferno, “by a process either resembling or contrasting with the sin itself.”)In the meantime, this Sunday’s Episode 4 is called “Dissonance Theory,” and HBO provided this synopsis: “Dolores joins William and Logan on a bounty hunt in the badlands. The Man in Black, with Lawrence in Tow, finds a critical clue in his search to unlock the maze. Dr. Ford and Theresa discuss the future of the park. Maeve is troubled by a recurring vision.”

    Speaking of Dolores and William, Evan Rachel Wood and Jimmi Simpson shared some behind-the-scenes scoop on the image we were left with at the end of Episode 3, when Dolores fell into William’s arms:

    We can’t wait to see what’s coming, and see what new theories are launched (and shut down) by the results. “Westworld” Season 1 airs Sundays at 9 p.m. on HBO. For more from Evan Rachel Wood, read Moviefone’s exclusive Q&A with her on why Dolores is her favorite character ever.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Westworld’ Creators Totally Thought About ‘Game of Thrones’ Crossover

    WestworldTwo epic dramas set in unusual worlds, both on HBO — it’s natural that fans have been clamoring for a crossover between “Westworld” and “Game of Thrones.” And it’s something the creators of “Westworld” thought about even before the show premiered — and all thanks to George R.R. Martin, the writer behind “Game of Thrones.”

    OK, so the crossover idea is based on the 1973 “Westworld” movie which featured other android-populated places like Roman World and Medieval World. That last one could be turned into a “Game of Thrones”-themed park. And apparently, Martin jokingly suggested the idea to Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy.

    “We love George and our daughter’s first trip anywhere in the world was out to Santa Fe for a screening of ‘The Prestige’ at his theater, the Jean Cocteau,” Nolan told Entertainment Weekly. “He’s a lovely guy and a stunning writer and it’s flattering he would encourage a crossover. We should be so lucky.”

    The biggest hitch is that it would mean dragons are actually androids. As Joy explained, “I need to believe that dragons are real. I want them be a real thing. So as much as I love George, I can’t lose that for myself!”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • This ‘Westworld’ Theory About the Man in Black Will Blow Your Mind

    WestworldJust two episodes in, and HBO’s new drama, “Westworld,” is generating sprawling fan theories.

    One in particular is pretty mind-blowing: That the Man in Black (Ed Harris) and meek newcomer William (Jimmi Simpson) are the same person. Whaaaa? How?!

    As we know, the Man in Black has been coming to the park for 30 years. As the theory goes, Billy’s scenes are set in that time frame.

    The theory was first posed by a user on Reddit, who noted that Billy’s scenes seem to be set in the past. Other Redditors jumped on that train, comparing the more retro Westworld logo during Billy’s arrival with the sleeker logo in Sizemore’s office.

    There are also slight differences with Billy’s entrance into the park with Teddy’s (James Marsden) in the first episode — no kids pranking the drunk, and an Army officer is recruiting men vs. the sheriff for a posse to track down the bandit Hector. These could be narrative changes introduced by the staff in the last 30 years.

    Also, speaking of Teddy, where is he in Billy’s arrival? Even though Teddy is a host, he’s seen getting off the train and being treated like a newcomer in episode 1. But he’s missing when Billy gets off the train in episode 2. Not only that, Billy takes Teddy’s place when he picks up the errant can for Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood).

    Could the park’s writing staff created the Teddy character as a kind of stand-in for young Billy? Is that why the Man in Black seems to loathe Teddy and kills him in episode 1? And if young Billy fell in love with Dolores, but she never recalled his existence, would that build up into the murderous rage that the Man in Black exhibits?

    The park goes even deeper than we thought!

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • HBO Releases ‘Westworld’ Episode 2 Early

    In a rare move for the spoiler-averse premium cable outlet, HBO is offering the second episode of its newest hit fantasy series, “Westworld,” online and on demand for early viewing ahead of its scheduled Sunday debut.

    The episode, titled “Chestnut,” was originally set to air for the first time on October 9. But Entertainment Weekly speculates that HBO decided to offer it early — via its HBO Now, HBO Go, and HBO On Demand platforms — to avoid any conflict with the second presidential debate, which is also scheduled for Sunday night.

    Last Sunday, the “Westworld” premiere pulled in 3.3 million viewers — HBO’s biggest series premiere since the 2014 debut of “True Detective” — so the cable outlet probably wanted to preserve some of those total viewership numbers for the show’s sophomore episode. Still, it’s a bit of a surprising decision, especially considering how protective the network is of its other prestige drama, “Game of Thrones,” which famously stopped sending out advance screeners to critics ahead of the season six debut.

    “Westworld” episode two is available now for HBO subscribers. It should be back to its regular schedule in time for episode three.

    [via: Entertainment Weekly]

  • 6 Questions From the ‘Westworld’ Premiere We Need Answered Immediately

    The debut of HBO’s “Westworld” left audiences spinning. Here are six burning questions we have following the show’s premiere.