Tag: star-trek-deep-space-nine

  • Michelle Yeoh’s ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Movie Adds New Cast

    Michelle Yeoh as Georgiou in 'Star Trek: Section 31' streaming on Paramount+, 2024.
    Michelle Yeoh as Georgiou in ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ streaming on Paramount+, 2024. Photo Credit: Jan Thijs/Paramount+

    Preview:

    • The Michelle Yeoh-starring ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ movie has begun shooting.
    • Omari Hardwick and Sam Richardson are joining the cast.
    • The movie will stream on Paramount+.

    For the past few years, the ‘Star Trek’ TV series have been flying the flag for the venerable sci-fi franchise as the big screen adventures have been stymied in cinematic development drydock (yet another example was announced recently).

    But, while it won’t be warping into movie theaters, the small screen ‘Trek’ universe has spawned its own movie, based on the further adventures of Emperor Philippa Georgiou, as played to winning effect by Michelle Yeoh in the first season of ‘Star Trek: Discovery’.

    And, as the movie kicks off shooting, the likes of Omari Hardwick, Kacey Rohl, Sam Richardson, Sven Ruygrok, Robert Kazinsky, Humberly Gonzalez and James Hiroyuki Liao are joining the cast.

    Related Article: Michelle Yeoh to Star in ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Movie For Paramount+

    What’s the story for ‘Star Trek: Section 31’?

    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou on Paramount+'s 'Star Trek: Discovery.'
    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou on Paramount+’s ‘Star Trek: Discovery.’

    Yeoh’s Captain Phillipa Georgiou was a powerful presence… at least (spoiler alert if you’ve somehow not caught up on the first episode of ‘Discovery’, which screened in 2017) until she died at the hands (and blade) of a Klingon warrior.

    Yet that was not the end for Yeoh’s story –– a trip to the Mirror Universe (established all the way back in the 1960s original ‘Star Trek’) revealed that there was another Georgiou –– and she was Emperor of the cruel Terran Empire. She eventually ended up helping our heroes, and in a deleted scene, was approached by a member of the stealthy organization Section 31.

    Originally developed as a series, the concept was instead announced as a movie last April. The basic synopsis for the movie reads: “Georgiou joins a secret division of Starfleet. Tasked with protecting the United Federation of Planets, she also must face the sins of her past.”

    What is Section 31?

    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou of the CBS All Access series 'Star Trek: Discovery.'
    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou of the CBS All Access series ‘Star Trek: Discovery.’ Photo: Russ Martin/CBS All Access 2017 CBS Interactive. All Rights Reserved.

    First introduced in ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’, Section 31 was an organization which claimed to protect the security interests of United Earth and, later, the United Federation of Planets. During the mid-23rd century, they were considered a critical division of Starfleet Intelligence, while by the 24th century, they were believed to be a rogue organization not considered part of the Federation but were in fact still part of Starfleet Intelligence.

    Who is making the movie?

    Omari Hardwick as Cruise in 'The Mother.'
    Omari Hardwick as Cruise in ‘The Mother.’ Photo: Doane Gregory/Netflix © 2023.

    Craig Sweeny is writing the script, with ‘Discovery’ veteran Olatunde Osunsanmi directing.

    Here’s what executive producer Alex Kurtzman had to say about the movie kicking off:

    “And we’re off to the races! Thrilled to report principal photography has started on ‘Star Trek: Section 31’. We welcome our incredible cast of new characters as they join our beloved Michelle Yeoh on her next wild adventure across the ‘Trek’ universe.”

    When will the new ‘Star Trek’ movie be streaming?

    While we know the movie will premiere on Paramount+, but there is no confirmed release date yet.

    Sam Richardson as Gilbert in Disney's live-action 'Hocus Pocus 2.'
    Sam Richardson as Gilbert in Disney’s live-action ‘Hocus Pocus 2,’ exclusively on Disney+. Photo courtesy of Disney Enterprises, Inc. © 2022 Disney Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    Other ‘Star Trek’ Movies:

    Buy ‘Star Trek’ Movies On Amazon

  • Michelle Yeoh Starring in ‘Star Trek’ Movie

    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou on Paramount+'s 'Star Trek: Discovery.'
    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou on Paramount+’s ‘Star Trek: Discovery.’

    Michelle Yeoh made a big impact on the world of ‘Star Trek’ from the very first episode of ‘Star Trek: Discovery’. As Captain Phillipa Georgiou, she was a powerful presence… at least (spoiler alert if you’ve somehow not caught up on the episode, which screened in 2017) until she died at the hands (and blade) of a Klingon warrior.

    Yet that was not the end for Yeoh’s story –– a trip to the Mirror Universe (established all the way back in the 1960s original ‘Star Trek’) revealed that there was another Georgiou –– and she was Emperor of the cruel Terran Empire. She eventually ended up helping our heroes, and in a deleted scene, was approached by a member of the stealthy organization Section 31.

    In 2019, we learned that Paramount+ was developing a series featuring Georgiou working for Section 31, but plans have now shifted. Yeoh will now star in a TV movie called ‘Star Trek: Section 31.’

    'Star Trek: Deep Space Nine' (1993 - 1999).
    ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’ (1993 – 1999).

    What is Section 31?

    First introduced in ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’, Section 31 was an organization which claimed to protect the security interests of United Earth and, later, the United Federation of Planets. During the mid-23rd century, they were considered a critical division of Starfleet Intelligence, while by the 24th century, they were believed to be a rogue organization not considered part of the Federation but were in fact still part of Starfleet Intelligence.

    There are no plot details for the show yet, beyond a basic synopsis: “Emperor Philippa Georgiou joins a secret division of Starfleet tasked with protecting the United Federation of Planets and faces the sins of her past.”

    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou of the CBS All Access series 'Star Trek: Discovery.'
    Michelle Yeoh as Philippa Georgiou of the CBS All Access series ‘Star Trek: Discovery.’ Photo: Russ Martin/CBS All Access 2017 CBS Interactive. All Rights Reserved.

    Related Article: Full List of 95th Academy Awards Winners

    Who is making the movie?

    Craig Sweeny is writing the script, with ‘Discovery’ veteran Olatunde Osunsanmi directing.

    Here’s what Yeoh had to say about Georgiou’s return,

    “I’m beyond thrilled to return to my ‘Star Trek’ family and to the role I’ve loved for so long. Section 31 has been near and dear to my heart since I began the journey of playing Philippa all the way back when this new golden age of ‘Star Trek’ launched. To see her finally get her moment is a dream come true in a year that’s shown me the incredible power of never giving up on your dreams. We can’t wait to share what’s in store for you, and until then: live long and prosper (unless Emperor Georgiou decrees otherwise)!”

    Executive producer Alex Kurtzman adds,

    “All the way back in 2017, before the first season of ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ had even aired, Michelle had the idea to do a spin-off for her character, Philippa Georgiou. She broke new ground as one of the first two women on screen in the pilot to usher in a new age of ‘Trek,’ and now, six years later, ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ finally arrives on the heels of her latest groundbreaking win. Everyone on Team ‘Trek’ couldn’t be more thrilled to have our legendary friend return home to us as we expand our storytelling into new and uncharted corners of the Trekverse. Long live Emperor Georgiou; long live Michelle Yeoh!”

    Production on the movie will start later this year.

    In related Paramount+ (and indirectly, ‘Star Trek’ news), there is a change going on for the TV series spin-off of 1999 movie ‘Galaxy Quest’.

    The cult favorite film, directed by Dean Parisot, followed a ragtag group of actors played Tim Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Alan Rickman, Tony Shalhoub, Sam Rockwell, and Daryl Mitchell who all once starred on a ‘Trek’-alike series called ‘Galaxy Quest’.

    One night, after their latest convention outing, the group is contacted by aliens who think their adventures are historical documents and have created a real version of their ship. There’s just one catch… the extraterrestrials need their help to fight the evil, powerful alien warlord Sarris (Robin Sachs). With the help of some young fans (including one played by Justin Long), they’re able to succeed.

    It has been a long road for development on a series based on the movie, but Paramount+ is trying again.

    Sam Rockwell, Alan Rickman, Tim Allen, Daryl Mitchell, Sigourney Weaver, and Tony Shalhoub in 'Galaxy Quest.'
    (L to R) Sam Rockwell, Alan Rickman, Tim Allen, Daryl Mitchell, Sigourney Weaver, and Tony Shalhoub in ‘Galaxy Quest.’ Photo: DreamWorks.

    What happened to the ‘Galaxy Quest’ series before?

    Paramount TV and Amazon were reported as developing a show aimed at continuing the story of the movie back in 2015. Writer Robert Gordon (who was one of the scribes on the movie), was aboard to craft a series script, but problems began over casting the original stars, and that was compounded by the tragic death of Rickman in January 2016.

    Yet there was still hope it could get made; actor, comedian and writer Paul Scheer took over a couple of years later and seemed upbeat about the idea.

    Here’s what Scheer said to Deadline,

    “Without giving much away, I don’t think there has ever been a better time to continue the ‘Galaxy Quest’ story with the explosion and popularity of sci-fi films in recent years. To be able to create and be a part of this world is just mind-blowing, and I’m approaching this truly as what I’d like to see as a fan.”

    Despite all that seemingly positive movement, the series lingered in space dock, seemingly unable to find traction.

    Amazon quietly dropped the idea recently, but Paramount is not ready to give up, with another version now at an early stage via Paramount+.

    Little has been announced about what shape it could take or whether the cast will be involved this time; indeed, no writer or director is attached yet. Mark Johnson, who was an executive producer on the 1999 movie, is driving development of the show, and the search is likely now on for a writer to flesh out the concept.

    By Grabthar’s Hammer, it still has a chance!

    Tim Allen, Alan Rickman, and Sigourney Weaver in 'Galaxy Quest.'
    (L to R) Tim Allen, Alan Rickman, and Sigourney Weaver in ‘Galaxy Quest.’

    Other ‘Star Trek’ and ‘Galaxy Quest’ Movies:

    Buy ‘Star Trek’ Movies On Amazon

    Buy ‘Galaxy Quest’ Movies On Amazon

     

     

  • We Still Can’t Get Over These Deaths of Our Favorite TV Characters

    We Still Can’t Get Over These Deaths of Our Favorite TV Characters

  • ‘Outlander’ Showrunner Ron Moore Talks the New Season and 30 Years of ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’

    Few writer-producers in television have had the kind of impact as Ronald D. Moore has.

    From his earliest work on “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and “Star Trek; Deep Space Nine,” to his acclaimed reinvention of “Battlestar Galactica,” to his current run bringing author Diana Gabaldon’s cherished historical romance novel series “Outlander” to life, Moore has been engaging and entertaining fans for more than 25 years.

    With “Outlander” launching its third season Sept. 10 — much to the relief of the show’s diehard fans, who have dubbed the agonizing 16-month wait between seasons “Droughtlander” — Moore joined Moviefone to discuss the making of the newest episodes, the challenges of the new season’s constant hopping through time and countries, and the pleasures and pains of keeping the series’ central lovers Claire (Caitriona Balfe) and Jamie (Sam Heughan) apart.

    Moore also reflected on his long involvement with “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” which celebrates the 30th anniversary of its Sept. 28, 1987 premiere this month, including his experience with “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry and his favorite personal contributions to the “Trek” mythos.

    Moviefone: What were the big challenges for you in the new season of “Outlander” on both a storytelling level and on a production level?

    Ronald D. Moore: The production challenges were much bigger. The scope of the season is so big. Traveling through the different time periods –- not just 20th century to Scotland, but also ’40s, ’50s, and ’60s in the 20th century. And then all the Scottish stuff. Then pivoting the show in the middle, and going to South Africa, and the ships, and then Jamaica. It was very complicated production-wise. That was easily the biggest challenge.

    In terms of story, actually, this was an easier book to adapt than the prior season was, so that laid out pretty well. Just in terms of story, probably [the most challenging aspect] was figuring out what the Claire/Frank story was going to be. That took the most thought, because it wasn’t really in the book, so we constructed it from various other books and backstories, and things that were suggested but maybe not clearly defined.

    Was it at all worrisome keeping your two leads apart for a length of time in the story?

    Not to me. I kind of felt like, every week, the audience is going to be saying, “I can’t wait for them to get back together.” But good. You want to build that yearning and that desire, so that when it happens, it has a big emotional payoff. I feel like if we they had gotten back together after one or two episodes, it’d be nice, but it’d be kind of like an “Okay -– great.” Holding it as long as we’ve held it, I think that builds the suspension and tension.

    What do you think it did for the characters to leave them apart for so long, in the ways you were able to explore them?

    It’s nice to see them in isolation from each other, because so much of the show is about them together. Splitting them up allows you to sort of see them interact with other people more, and sort of explore them in a different way, so that the relationship between the two of them isn’t front and center.

    So you can do things: Jamie’s relationship with his family gets a little bit more time. His relationship to John Grey and Murtagh, and Willie -– you open up all these other doors that, when it’s just Claire and Jamie, that sort of dominates everything else. There’s plenty of that to play in the show, so it was nice to have a one stretch of time where we could do other things.
    Did you want to try to keep your two stars apart as well, so there might be a little extra magic when you did finally get them together on camera?

    I don’t know that we talked about that overtly. Not really. I just wanted to keep them apart for the audience. If you look closely through those episodes, you’ll see that, even when they’re thinking about each other and they’re either doing flashbacks or hallucinations, or whatever, we were careful never to put them in the same frame together, so that the audience never had a moment of the satisfaction of seeing the two leads share the screen. So that was a deliberate choice. They were still sort of around each other in Scotland, so they weren’t really in isolation.

    Did you have any surprises along the way as you were in production, little zigs and zags that you hadn’t anticipated but turned out well?

    The only thing that comes to mind off the top of my head is, in the Battle of Culloden, this sequence between Jack and Jamie was not quite as big and interesting as it was on screen. I wrote it, that they have this moment, and the two men fight, and they collapse together. But the director and the cast just opened it up more and gave it a deeper emotional resonance.

    It was also the serendipity of they just happened to be shooting at magic hour when that sequence happened. It’s a gorgeous sky. It looks fantastic. A lot of that was just an accident, and they just embraced it and went for it. Then Tobias [Menzies] and Sam found that moment… All that wasn’t scripted -– that’s just something that they found. So that’s an example: you just find something and it works really well.

    Did you cast your John Grey [with Australian actor David Berry] with the thought that this is a character that does have his own adventures, and maybe you will bring those to life on screen sometime?

    A little bit in the back of your head you’re thinking about that. That’s come up in casual conversations. It’s not really in active development, so we didn’t really set him up with that specifically like, “Oh, and this is potentially a lead of another show.”

    What do you love about what you guys have been able to bring to Diana Gabaldon’s stories at this point?

    I think we’ve just opened up the world a bit. Primarily, the stories are told from Claire’s POV. In Season One, we hewed pretty closely to that. But as the series has developed, you start broadening it out and opening the show up a little beyond Claire’s internal dialogue with herself, and her single perspective on the world starts to broaden out to Jamie and to other characters. It’s really nice to sort of have opened up the whole world of “Outlander” a little bit more on camera.

    As a crew, were you very excited to create the other eras? To break away from the historical period that you’d already spent a lot of time in?

    I don’t think anybody was excited to do the other periods, except maybe the writers! It’s just a pain in the ass for production. They have to keep track of all the stuff: “What’s Claire’s hairstyle in the 50s versus her hairstyle in the ’40s? Wait a minute -– now we’re in 1968. Do we have the right set dec for that on the same set, and later, tomorrow, we’re shooting Jamie in Scotland!” It doesn’t make anybody happy to go sliding around time.

    What got you creatively energized when you think about the next season?

    Again, it’s a whole different show. Now it’s the American colonies, about a decade before the American Revolution, in the hinterlands of North Carolina. You’re essentially doing version of “Little House on the Prairie.” It’s a pioneer story. You’ve got Native Americans, you’ve got Antebellum south with slaves. You’ve got the first stirrings of things that will become the American Revolution. You’ve got new villains.

    Like every year, it’s “Oh, we’re starting from zero, and what’s this year of TV going to be?” It’s exciting. It’s challenging. It’s tiring, because you would like the familiarity and the comfort of just, “Okay, let’s go shoot in the CIC again.” You long for those kinds of days. But creatively, the show never gets boring. You’re never sort of like, “Oh yeah, we’re doing one of these episodes again.” It’s a completely different challenge every time you sit down to write one.
    I also wanted to ask you about “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” and the 30th anniversary.

    Is it? This year? Sh*t. I must be getting old. Wow, that’s a trip.

    What does that mean to you now, looking back to see what you all were able to accomplish with that series, with that group of characters, with that group of actors, against almost impossible odds?

    It’s hard to really think about it in those terms. We were so inside of it, and it was such hard work, and we were doing it so intensively. Now, I feel like doing 13 episodes or 16 episodes is a back-breaker, but we were doing 26 a year — and you just did so many of them, and you were constantly writing and constantly producing. It’s amazing we were able to do it at all.

    But it is remarkable. It’s difficult, in some ways, to remember what it was like. When I started on the show in its third season, it was not really accepted as real “Star Trek.” The fans were very skeptical, and the fans were kind of split. There were those who liked “Next Gen,” and there were those that hated it. I remember going to a convention when I was still a fan, and there were like the bumper stickers and the t-shirts that were about “real” “Star Trek,” and various things -– “the bald guy” was not accepted.

    And then that all shifted and changed, and suddenly, it became “Star Trek.” It’s really funny to remember that there actually was a moment when “Next Gen” wasn’t taken seriously by the fans themselves, who almost didn’t embrace it. Even though they were watching it religiously, they were still bagging on it privately and among each other.

    So I guess I’m just really proud of the fact that we just loved the show ourselves, and we were committed to what we were doing, and we never doubted for a minute that it was “Star Trek.” We just sort of waited for everyone else to catch up.

    What were the big tools that you walk out of that experience with as a writer and as a producer?

    It was becoming a writer and a producer. “Next Gen,” I was there for five years, and I learned writing. I learned what it was to write for television. I was a complete neophyte. I’d never written for TV before, and I was surrounded by much more experienced writers. By the end of that experience, I had learned television writing and television production.

    When I went to “Deep Space Nine,” it was like a graduate course. It was like, “Okay, now let’s push even further. Let’s get deeper inside of character. Let’s challenge the format itself. Let’s try to make it more serialized. Let’s challenge the idea of what ‘Star Trek’ could be.” So it really taught me not to be satisfied with what a show is, that there was always a better show that you could make tomorrow. [That] was really the biggest thing that I took away from that experience.
    Being a fan before you got involved with the show, what was your favorite contribution to the “Trek” mythology? You obviously gave a lot to the Klingon empire.

    A lot to the Klingons. You know what the funny thing is? I really liked naming starships! I really enjoyed that. If there was a chance to name a starship, I love doing it, and creating a different class of starship. I really got into that.

    I was always pulling back into references of either naval history that I thought were really cool, or I was naming ships after the Hornblower series, or something else — or some random ship that had been mentioned once in an original series episode and I was going to do a new one. That was, like, my favorite gig. I always liked to name starships.

    I know that Gene Roddenberry wasn’t in his best health around the time that you came on, but were there things that you learned from Gene in particular from your personal encounters with him? Or just from the way he organized the show?

    The show was pretty disorganized when I got there, so I sort of learned, “Don’t do this.” I started third season; he was still definitely involved third season. He rewrote a script while I was there. He was throwing out scripts. He tried to throw out a script of mine, but didn’t, ultimately.

    Then his health kind of started declining as the fourth season moved on. I didn’t really have many story meetings with him. He was just a genial, bear-like guy, with a quiet sense of humor. Everyone really kind of liked him as a person, intuitively. He just had this enormous reputation.

    But you were catching him in a moment of decline, physically, and he was starting to step away from the show more and more. So yeah, there weren’t really TV writing lessons that I had an opportunity to really get from Gene.

    As a fan of the original show, what were the inherent qualities that you were excited to perpetuate forward, those “Star Trek” essences that you really wanted to have in “Next Generation?”

    I really wanted to hang on to the nautical and naval traditions that I thought were embedded in the original series. When Gene started talking about “Next Gen,” Starfleet wasn’t really a military organization, and they were starting to drop more and more of those little touches around the show.

    I thought those were really compelling, and really gave The Original Series a specific identity as a ship in space. So I kept putting those things back in: Everything from, like, the nautical bell at a court marshal hearing, to dress uniforms, to sort of little ways of there being a watch on the bridge, watches relieving other watches on the bridge. Who was the officer of the deck? The chain of command. I was always trying to keep those as part of the “Star Trek” traditions.

    I thought that was important, because it identified what Starfleet was, and it gave a hierarchy and an ethos, and sort of an idea to what there was — even though, yeah, they were more explorers and scientists and so on. There was this core nautical, naval identity of who they were.

    We got to see the original cast in their older years, working together, playing those characters. Would you love to see the “Next Generation” cast get a chance to revisit their characters and be together again at least one more time?

    Yeah, that’d be a kick. It’d be a lot of fun. None of them look quite as old as they did in “All Good Things” [the series’ final episode, set in part 25 years in the future] in all fairness. Patrick [Stewart] looks much better than the way we portrayed him in “All Good Things!” So none of them have aged even as far as what we said they would. But it would be a kick to put that group back together and do something. Yeah, that’d be a lot of fun.

  • ‘Star Trek’ Stars From Across Its 50-Year History Share What Their Voyage Means to Them

    To celebrate the 50th anniversary of “Star Trek,” which first aired on Sept. 8, 1966, and has continued to boldly go forward as one of the most enduring, influential and visionary television creations of all time, Moviefone is offering a week-long look at five decades of the futuristic franchise.

    No television series has enjoyed such a unique and unlikely path to becoming a cultural phenomenon as “Star Trek.” Creator Gene Roddenberry‘s pioneering vision for an adult, ambitious and allegorical science fiction series featuring explorers aboard the starship Enterprise experienced rocky beginnings as a failed pilot deemed “too intellectual” by NBC.

    But the network gave the premise a second chance and, with the addition of more action and an appealing triumvirate of new leads Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock and Dr. McCoy, fueled by William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, and Deforest Kelley‘s delightful chemistry, the forward-thinking series got a second chance at life, airing for the first time 50 years ago today, on Sept. 8, 1966.

    What followed has become legendary in the creation of what would become a full-fledged franchise, including the highly-rated syndicated series “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and its subsequent shared-universe series; the box office-dominating films that rebooted the “Star Trek” originals with new actors; tie-in novels and comic books; and a massive merchandising empire.

    But, at its core, “Star Trek” has always been a story about humanity, both on screen and behind the scenes. And to that effect, Moviefone has spent the last several months of the sci-fi phenom’s golden anniversary in the company of many of the key creative people at the heart of its various incarnations, gathering their takes on what it’s meant to them to occupy a place within the singular sensation called “Star Trek.”2016 Summer TCA Tour - NBCUniversal Press Tour Day 1 - ArrivalsWilliam Shatner (actor, Capt. James T. Kirk, “Star Trek: The Original Series,” “Star Trek” theatrical films I-VI, “Star Trek: Generations”): We’ve invented, through science fiction, a mythology, and “Star Trek” is a huge part of that. So many great science fiction writers had ideas for “Star Trek,” even if they didn’t write exactly for “Star Trek,” so it was 50 years as a mere television show, and through various iterations expanded to affect a great deal of our culture, far beyond anything we know.

    I mean, I wrote a book called “I’m Working on That” based on Stephen Hawking’s statement, when he walked into the set of “Star Trek” and saw these cheesy boards painted to look like … what’s the stuff we use for energy? … dilithium crystals. That’s how we were able to go so fast to cover the vast distances of space. Stephen Hawking said “I’m working on that.” It goes out in waves, and it seems somewhat innocuous, because it’s a television show, but in this case, this phenomenon has lasted 50 years.Premiere Of 20th Century Fox's "Independence Day: Resurgence" - Red CarpetBrent Spiner (actor, Lt. Commander Data, “Star Trek: The Next Generation”): “Star Trek” is the most amazing phenomenon. I think it’s the great American narrative. Because anything that has gone for 50 years you have to take seriously. There were a lot of people who think “Star Trek” is practically a religion. There are other people who think it’s absolutely silly. It’s somehow all of those things combined, and that’s what makes it wonderful.

    Even if you think it’s completely ridiculous, you have to kind of say, “What is this that’s gone for 50 years? I’ve got to at least check it out.” There’s something going on here, and it’s affected a lot of people. We’ve all had people come to us and say, “It’s because of your show, it’s because of you, that I am now a doctor or a scientist or …” So there’s something more going on there than meets the eye. There’s a wonderful action-adventure show, but there’s also something deeper and more profound.

    Dorothy “D. C.” Fontana (writer and story editor, “Star Trek: The Original Series,” “Star Trek: The Animated Series,” “Star Trek: The Next Generation”): We told good stories, I think. I’ve said this over and over: we were telling stories about things that were going on in our world, under the guise of science fiction. We were telling stories about racism, and sexism, and political things that were going on in our country, and in the world. We were doing stories about, well, just about anything — the Vietnam War, that was a big one. Nobody else could mention the Vietnam War, or even that we were in it, but we could, under the guise of science fiction.

    We reached out to people. We tapped them on the head and say, “Hey, are you paying attention?” But we were doing it in the guise of interesting science fiction stories. We had some great science fiction writers on the show, especially in the first year, who brought that wonderful element of exploring topical themes under the guise of science fiction.Star Trek Beyond Asia Tour - Beijing Press ConferenceChris Pine (actor, Captain James T. Kirk, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond“): It’s fun playing a leader when sometimes you don’t always necessarily feel like a leader yourself. So you learn what that’s like because on set naturally then you’re saying stuff that sounds leader-ish. So then you sometimes assume the part. There’s some learning lessons there. I suppose my reluctance in that regard kind of maybe reflects in the character himself, because I think we all have times where we either want to be front seat or backseat drivers.

    I appreciate in this latest installment playing a character that was a bit more existentially indecisive and lost and seeking some sort of new guidance, or new propulsion, or new energy behind what he was going to do, because sometimes things change when you’re a little bit older.Star Trek: Mission New York - Day 3Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”): Initially, when I watched the show in the ’60s, it meant what everybody talks about as that inclusion of different characters, different races, and hope for the future — all the kind of stuff that we know about. And then, when I was in college, it was about great fun and getting your mind off of your school work and everything just for an hour, just to not really concentrate on other things, having a good time.

    Then later on when I got the show, it was about, “Wow, great! It’s a great character. I’m going to do a really great job. I’m really happy about this. I’m a working actor again.” And then it became the people I worked with. That was the most exciting part.

    David Gerrold (writer, “The Trouble with The Tribbles,” associate producer, “Star Trek; The Next Generation”): Gene Roddenberry gave us “Star Trek” [and] he was passionate about “Star Trek.” And if it hadn’t been for him, we’d have never had the show. So we have this incredibly iconic thing that is going to change our culture for generations to come, because it’s about the possibilities of the future, it’s about a future where we’re all thriving and doing well and all have opportunities and we’re all included.

    it’s a very positive view of the future, and I give Gene enormous credit for that, because I don’t think anybody else has been able to create that kind of a vision of a future that works for all of us, with no one and nothing left out.Amazon Red Carpet Premiere Screening For Season Two Of Original Drama Series, "Bosch"Star Trek: Voyager”): It’s an optimistic, hopeful view of what we could possibly achieve in the future as humanity. If we can get it together. That’s what Gene was so brilliant at with the original series, in the very beginning, was showing in the height of the Cold War, a Russian officer on the bridge. Not that long after World War II, a Japanese officer on the bridge. Blacks, whites, women, everybody. And everyone was together and everyone worked together.

    I think it’s so important for us to see that now as a society. Not just in America, although really specifically here, but the whole world. We need to not be afraid of everyone who’s different. We’ve got to embrace our differences and realize that we’re stronger together, and we’re all inherently the same when it gets down to it."Star Trek Beyond" UK PremiereJohn Cho (actor, Hikaru Sulu, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): In the “Star Trek” setup, you’re going into space and seeing so many different kinds of species, it does become comically apparent when you look around the planet Earth that we live on that we do have so much more in common than we don’t. You know? So the little things that seem to divide us here in our present time seem even more exaggeratedly small after seeing an episode of “Star Trek.”Simon Pegg (actor, Montgomery “Scotty” Scott, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” writer, “Star Trek Beyond”): The first thing I saw was the animated series, funny enough, which ran I think from like ’72 to ’74, I think, which had the original cast. And as a very young child, I was like three or four, it caught my eye. Then I found out there was actually a live action version that pre-dated it, and I started watching that. I found that scary at first. I found that “The Corbomite Maneuver” and the terrifying Balok was the figurehead of my childhood nightmares.

    But it was still like something I had to watch. And that grew into a love of its kind of intelligence. As I got older, I started to understand just how much weight it carried, allegorically. It’s meant different things to me over the years. And obviously, now, it kind of means the world to me.Premiere Of Paramount Pictures' "Star Trek Beyond" - ArrivalsKarl Urban (actor, Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I remember watching “Star Trek” when I was a kid with my dad, and then I watched “Star Trek” with my kids. There’s something about “Star Trek” that just has this enduring appeal. It’s a hopeful, positive, optimistic vision of the future, and it was a fun show.The Cartier Fifth Avenue Grand Reopening EventZachary Quinto (actor, Mr. Spock, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I think Leonard Nimoy would be really proud of what we accomplished … I take it seriously, and I feel like this is one of the most beloved characters in popular culture. He made it so. I see my responsibility as carry on his legacy and honoring the work that he put into this character, and the love that he lived with it for so long.5th Annual Critics' Choice Television Awards - Red CarpetScott Bakula (actor, Capt. Jonathan Archer, “Star Trek: Enterprise”): I fell in love with it, really, in re-runs when I was in college, because it was on every night, followed by Tom Snyder. So everything stopped, and we would watch “Star Trek.” I lived in a fraternity house: “Star Trek,” Tom Snyder every night. And I loved the camaraderie of the show. They had the brotherly kind of love that I just thought was great. I hadn’t really seen it on television at that point.

    I loved the humor of it, but, mostly, at the end of the day, I just loved that relationship on that bridge. That’s why I wanted to do it and try and build something similar — you can’t repeat it, but similar on our show.

    Star Trek: Discovery”): I fell in love with “Star Trek” before even seeing “Star Trek.” And when I was a small child, too young to go to church, my brother had built a model of the Klingon cruiser and put a battery in it and turned off all the lights in the house and was flying it though.

    And I saw this ship, the silhouette of this ship, and my mind was lit on fire because I wanted to know who that ship belonged to, what they were like, where did they come from? And I started asking those questions and then I got to see “Star Trek” and I got to see an even bigger world than I imagined.

    Justin Lin (director, “Star Trek Beyond”): My family immigrated to the States when I was eight. They had a little fish and chips shop, and they would close at 9 and we’d have dinner at 10. At 11, “Star Trek” came on Channel 13, so my brothers and I would talk our way into just hanging out with them. So, from 8 to 18, that was our level of engagement and our family time.

    I remember moving to a new country felt like it was just the five of us. But watching “Star Trek,” it instilled in me that family is not just by blood. It’s through shared experience. That’s what “Star Trek” gave me. Our engagement was through re-runs, but every night, it was a new adventure with new obstacles and new challenges. That sense of discovery and exploration was a big part of growing up. My friends all had the little “Star Wars” figures, but we didn’t have any of that: we had “Star Trek.”Premiere Of Paramount Pictures' "Star Trek Beyond" - ArrivalsJ.J Abrams (director, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” producer “Star Trek Beyond”): I’m a late adopter, to be totally honest. I was not a “Star Trek” fan as a kid, and I realized what I missed out on, because I got to fall in love with it watching the shows when I started working on the films.

    Michael Giacchino (music score, “Star Trek” (2009), “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I grew up in the early ’70s, so that’s how I watched it — I didn’t see it when it first aired. But I remember the first time I saw it thinking, “What is this? What on Earth is this show?” And I just kept watching it and watching it. And then I was asking about, “Can I have the action figures? Can I have the play set? The Enterprise play set?” Which I still have all that stuff. I still have it!

    It was sort of my first science fiction love. That show introduced me to science fiction, and then all of a sudden I was in love with “2001,” and I just kept going from there. But it was my gateway drug into sci-fi. [The original series music is] so iconic, because we’ve all watched those things so many times. And Alexander Courage’s theme is the greatest.

    Karl Urban: If it wasn’t for the fans, we wouldn’t be here. This show would have been cancelled in the second season.

    Simon Pegg: You’ve got to remember that it’s because it comes out of love and it comes out of a great sort of affection for something, which you can’t help but feel positive about. I get it. We all have our own feelings about “Star Trek.” It means something to all of us in different ways. What we tried to do with “Star Trek Beyond” was kind of try and embrace everybody that has come before, and everyone that hasn’t come yet.

    It’s almost like you can cross an episode of the original show with what you get from a modern blockbuster: “This is the hybrid — it’s year one and year 50 together.” That was our dream.Entertainment Weekly Hosts Its Annual Comic-Con Party At FLOAT At The Hard Rock Hotel In San Diego In Celebration Of Comic-Con 2Adam Savage (“Mythbusters” host, “Star Trek” fan): I grew up with the original series airing on television in the early ’70s. I watched every episode a million times. Science fiction has always had these two pulls, but one of them was about real social commentary, and that’s where “Star Trek’s” strengths are. I grew up inculcated with a sort of lovely liberal, diverse ethic that “Star Trek” baked right into the show, and that came right from Roddenberry.

    I will say, as a fan, every single human I’ve ever met within the “Star Trek” franchise is awesome. It’s like, this is a franchise born out of a cohesive work unit, and it really shows in the movies that they make.

    Michael Dorn: I still don’t know what “Star Trek” means — I really don’t! … CHiPs.” I didn’t know this until we had this conversation: Bob said, “You know, Michael, you created a character that’s an icon. That this guy is not just some guy, I mean, this is a guy that’s going to last, and it’s rare. You’re in the top .001% of actors who have done anything like that.” And at that point, that’s when I went, “My God, you’re right.” That’s when it kind of hit me.

    Jeri Ryan: It’s amazing the doors this has opened for us to get to meet people that are actually doing what we pretended to be doing on the show is really cool.

    Scott Bakula: I talked to a guy on the International Space Station with NASA. We sent up DVDs of our show, and he was watching it in space. We talked until Earth moved enough so we couldn’t talk anymore. We talked and talked and he said, “I’m going to lose you, sir.” He kept circling the planet. That was pretty cool. He made a video and sent it to us of them floating around up there and hanging out. It was combining all of it, it was completely surreal.

    We met a lot of the astronauts, who would come to the set, and to actually speak to somebody who was doing it up there was just something you wouldn’t expect you’d ever get to do in your life.

    Michael Dorn: I was a big airplane buff when I was growing up — I loved airplanes and I loved test pilots and I loved my cereal boxes, the boxtops with Friendship 7, John Glenn’s capsule. Those are the guys that I had a chance to meet that really kind of fueled my youth. That was amazing, because you’re talking about — they went to the moon! I mean, come on! Those are the guys that I just loved.

    Jeri Ryan: Specifically, for the character that I played, I heard from a lot of people on the autism spectrum who could relate to her, and said that this really helped them to see someone on TV, who kind of acted the way they did, and wasn’t sure of what they were doing, and was trying to figure things out socially, and that’s how they felt. And it was so touching for me, and I love that that was something that people could feel

    Scott Bakula: I was at the Griffith Park Observatory with my whole family, and a gal there came up and said “Hi, I work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. I sort of started working there because of ‘Star Trek.’” “Oh, that’s very nice. What do you do?” “You know the little thing that just landed on Mars?” she said, “Well, I kind of built that.”

    I said, “Are you kidding?” “Yeah, and I’m actually running it around Mars.” I was like, “Wow!” Yeah, and she’s like, “I’m such a fan of your show.” I said, “Forget about my show! How about you? You’re unbelievable!”

    William Shatner: For me, I love talking to people and finding the story and the character of who this person is and how they lived up to this point, and I’ve done shows in that way. I’ve just come back from Vancouver, where I was talking to the great geneticist from Amherst College, Dr. David Suzuki.

    It’s meeting people like Dr. Suzuki, astronaut Chris Hadfield, who I just interviewed a couple days ago at JPL — all of JPL subscribes to “Star Trek.” As does NASA. I’m doing a show for NASA, and all of NASA is enamored of “Star Trek.” I went to the doctor and he said “I became a doctor because of ‘Star Trek.’ Now spread your legs.”

    Brent Spiner: I had the opportunity to meet Dr. Hawking because he did an episode of the show. We met all of the Mercury astronauts, they were all still with us at the 30th anniversary of Alan Shepard’s first flight. It was overwhelming, and at that event was also Bob Hope and Walter Cronkite, and we were there, as pretend heroes.

    But for me, the most rewarding experience has been meeting all of these people: all of the family of “Star Trek” that have been in all of these episodes and films. The great creative people that I’ve got to rub shoulders with has been amazing. It’s a huge family at this point.

    Zachary Quinto: Hands down, my favorite part of filming these movies is getting to spend all my time with these people who are incredible. It keeps being brought up that we’ve been doing this for almost ten years, which is kind of unfathomable, but it was 2007 when we made the first movie. We are truly a family to one another. Even though we only get to work together every few years, we stay in touch and we stay connected. These are people that will be in my life for the rest of it. That to me is easily the best part about the experience.

    Justin Lin: I remember stepping into the hallways of Enterprise. The lights aren’t on and it’s still [being painted] and stuff. Just walking in there and feeling like, “Wow, I’m now part of this.”

    Karl Urban: Anytime you’re on the bridge of the Enterprise, and there’s 50 million buttons, you cannot help but go and push every single one of them. Just to see if something’s going to happen.

    J.J. Abrams: To be talking about the 50th anniversary is insane! I was born the same year that “Star Trek” was, and I know how old I feel. So the idea that this thing endures is incredible, and a real honor to be part of.

    Simon Pegg: I love that the universe is a boundless place and there’s so many adventures to be had. And as long as we have this idea that we might not just all kill ourselves and die in a big fire, we might actually become slightly more enlightened, slightly more tolerant beings and go off into space — THAT is a lovely idea that I think secretly the vast majority of us want to achieve, you know? “Star Trek” will live forever.

    Rod Roddenberry (son of “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry; executive producer, “Star Trek: Discovery”): You probably can’t put this, but I think my dad would say, “Holy sh*t, this is amazing!” You know, he used to do something pretty funny. He would get on stage, and he would fold his arms and kind of look at the audience and say, “Yep, just the way I planned it!” in a joking sort of way. But I know he’d be honored and thrilled, and he’d want to give so much credit to the fans. I think he’d be blown away by it, absolutely.

  • Bryan Fuller Reveals New ‘Star Trek’ Details, Says Series Will ‘Eventually’ Revisit Characters

    42nd Annual Saturn Awards - ArrivalsFifty years after the dawn of its original five-year mission, it’s clear that there’s very likely no final frontier when it comes to “Star Trek.” And even as fans celebrate its rich history on the 50th anniversary, Bryan Fuller is ready to captain “Trek’s” Next Iteration into an even bolder future.

    Following its debut in 1966 and an abbreviated three-season network run, creator Gene Roddenberry‘s “Star Trek” has become, in the intervening five decades, the most singular (and profitable) phenomenon ever spawned by the television medium, and holder of many unique distinctions: one of the earliest series ever given a second shot at a pilot when the first outing proved a bit too cerebral but showed great potential; cancelled not once but twice, after a massive, organized fan letter-writing campaign earned a reversal on its first axing; one of the first bona fide syndication sensations, broadening its cult audience into legions of viewers; one of the first series to be adapted into animated form, reuniting the bulk of the live-action cast; and the first-ever series to spawn the fan-centric convention culture and eventual online communities that reign today, attracting and uniting the passionate fanbase, both literally and virtually.

    There’s more: A sequel series was conceived to launch a fourth broadcast network that never came to be in the 1970s, but (with a little help from the sensational popularity of “Star Trek: The Next Generation” proved the durability of the concept beyond its beloved original cast — it won Peabody Awards, built a merchandizing juggernaut and launched a profitable first-run syndication market that subsequently gave birth to hits like “Baywatch” and “Xena: Warrior Princess” before ending on its own terms after seven seasons and moving into its own film series.

    Additional shows like “Deep Space Nine” built the brand, predicting dynastic TV like “Law & Order” and “CSI,” and with “Star Trek: Voyager” the franchise got around to launching a new broadcast network, UPN. After a period of cultural oversaturation and subsequent dormancy, “Trek” was successfully rebooted, reimagined, and re-youthified by former TV wunderkind J.J. Abrams into a faster, flashier, and equally popular new film series, proving yet again that “Star Trek” could continually go where no TV series has gone before.

    And this is merely the show business pedigree. The social impact of “Star Trek” over its 50-year mission — from including a multiracial crew with minorities in command roles at the height of the Civil Rights struggle to TV’s first interracial kiss; from the innumerable fans it inspired to pursue careers in the sciences and the arts to its fictional technologies turned fact today; and from William Shatner‘s musical career to the Internet dominance of George Takei — is, quite frankly, without measure or precedent.

    Which brings me to Bryan Fuller, recently anointed at the next television caretaker of the “Star Trek” storytelling legacy, which once again pioneers new ground as the flagship original series of CBS’s All Access streaming service.

    If Fuller’s pedigree as the creator of beloved, creatively adventurous series — both original, like “Pushing Daisies,” and building out pre-existing lore, like “Hannibal” — isn’t enough to excite fans looking for a return to the “Trek” tradition of provocative allegorical storytelling, consider that not only has Fuller already worked in the show’s universe as a writer for “Deep Space Nine” and “Voyager,” he’s assembled a dream team of supporting creators from “Trek’s” diverse history to work on the show.

    Among them are filmmaker Fringe,” “Hawaii Five-0″ and ‘Scorpion”; writer-producer Joe Menosky, a veteran of three “Star Trek” syndicated series; and Roddenberry Productions’ Trevor Roth and Rod Roddenberry, the son of the former airline pilot-turned-LAPD speechwriter-turned-TV writer-producer who created it all.

    While visiting the Saturn Awards, the sci-fi/superhero/fantasy equivalent of the Oscars and Emmys, I had my first chance to chat with Fuller since the new “Trek” series was announced, and as our conversation reveals, the as-yet-untitled new series he’s working on may be exploring even more new worlds, new civilizations and, perhaps most importantly, new philosophical questions about human existence at the furthest reaches of the galaxy. The series will never travel far from the legacy he hopes it upholds.

    Moviefone: You have a history with the franchise, you’re going to have more history with the franchise. As we approach the 50th anniversary, what has “Star Trek” meant to you over the years?

    Bryan Fuller: Oh, well, it’s the promise of a better world. Not only is it wonderful high-concept science-fiction storytelling, but it is the promise that we’re going to get our sh*t together as a species, fix our planet, and move out to the galaxy as a team. I think that’s the most exciting … that’s the most promising thing that “Star Trek” offers, is a vision of the future where we do all get along.

    You have a dream team assembled — creative people plucked from various eras in “Star Trek” history. What has that aspect brought to the table for you, in terms of who is putting the show together?

    I think it’s really about making sure that we maintain authenticity. One of the things that I am so excited about is working with Joe Menosky again, who I worked with on “Voyager,” and who was a pivotal writing in “Next Generation,” and a mentor of mine. So it’s wonderful to be working with him on “Star Trek.”

    It’s wonderful to be working with Nicholas Meyer, who I’ve admired for a long time. I pinch myself from time to time just being in the room and having the conversations that we’re having.

    Nick in particular is known for, arguably, the best of the movies, really: “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.”

    I agree.

    What has he brought to bear on the new series, with that distinctive dramatic sensibility that he has?

    Well, a clarity and a cleanliness to the storytelling. An ability to ground science-fiction in a relatable way, and also making sure that we’re telling character stories.

    There’s been a lot of speculation about the format and setting of the new series. What would you like to put out there now, to wet the appetite for the audience?

    I mean, it’s funny. I’ve read that we’re [set] before “Next Generation,” after [“Star Trek VI: The] Undiscovered Country,” which is false. I’ve read that it’s an anthology show, which is not accurate. So it’s interesting to see those suggestions, and seeing the truth mixed in with them and going like, “Oh, they got that part right…” But it’s sort of on the truth-o-meter on PolitiFacts. It’s sort of like some truth, and a lot of like, “No — pants on fire! That’s not true.”

    People got excited about the word “crews,” plural, in the teaser trailer.

    Yeah.

    Does that have a specific meaning? Or was that sort of a word that was used?

    No, I think we will be seeing lots of crews in the story. One of the things that is exciting for me is that we are telling a “Star Trek” story in a modern way. We’re telling a 13-chapter story in this first season. It’s nice to be able to dig deep into things that would have been breezed passed if we were doing episodic and had to contain a story to an episode.

    Would you like to revisit any characters? Is there a window open to bring in characters that have been established in the canon?

    Eventually. Eventually.

    Is the streaming aspect of it — is that going to affect it at all? Are you going to drop them all at once? Do you even know yet?

    No, it’s going to be weekly. And what it does allow us is, we are not subject to broadcast standards and practices. So we can have profanity if we choose — not that I want to see a “Star Trek” with lots of profanity. But we can certainly be more graphic than you would on broadcast network television.

    Tell me about the allegory element that is so potent in “Star Trek” storytelling, and what you want to do, what boundaries you want to push in this day and age.

    Well, I think that “Star Trek” is a show of firsts. And in researching the characters for this new iteration of “Star Trek,” I’ve been talking to Mae Jemison, who’s the first black woman in space, and who saw “Star Trek” in the ’60s and who saw Nichelle Nichols [as Lt. Uhura] on the bridge of a ship and said, “I see myself in space.”

    So there’s something wonderful about the legacy that Nichelle Nichols represents as giving a gift to people who weren’t previously able to see themselves in the future. We are going to be continuing that tradition of progressive casting and progressive character work to be an inclusive world.%Slideshow-219909%