Tag: Disney

  • Disney Is Working on a Live-Action ‘Mulan’ Remake, Too: Report

    disney's mulanIt’s no “Bambi,” but Disney may already have already set its next animated flick due for a live-action reboot.

    According to The Hollywood Reporter, the studio wants to develop a live-action version of “Mulan,” its 1998 film centered around the titular ancient Chinese girl, who disguises herself as a man to take her ailing father’s place in battle. Disney has already reportedly purchased a script by Elizabeth Martin and Lauren Hynek that features the same Chinese legend of Hua Mulan, which inspired the original animated flick, THR writes.

    While “Mulan”‘s box office receipts were modest by Disney standards — it pulled in around $304 million internationally — the studio’s recent success with live-action adaptations of its previous flicks has proven irresistibly lucrative. “Cinderella,” starring Lily James, has raked in $336.2 million worldwide since its bow three weeks ago, and last year’s “Maleficent,” featuring newly-minted Kids’ Choice Award-winner Angelina Jolie, hauled in a whopping $758.4 million.

    Disney is already actively developing a live-action “Beauty and the Beast,” starring Emma Watson, Dan Stevens, and Luke Evans, due in theaters on March 17, 2017. Other properties set to hit theaters soon include “The Jungle Book” and the “Alice in Wonderland” sequel “Through the Looking Glass,” both due out in 2016.

    Stay tuned for more info on “Mulan” as development continues.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

    Photo credit: Disney
    %Slideshow-123181%

  • Box Office: Does ‘Run All Night’ Mark the End of Liam Neeson’s Run of Action Hits?

    liam neeson in run all nightIt’s no surprise that “Cinderella” beat “Run All Night” among newcomers this weekend. The Disney live-action fairy tale was widely expected to suck all the oxygen out of the box office, and its estimated $70.1 million debut is in line with predictions.

    Still, “Run All Night” seemed like it would be smart counter-programming, drawing older men who wouldn’t be interested in a movie made for young girls. Yet “Run All Night” underperformed even its modest predictions (in the $14 million range), opening instead at just an estimated $11.0 million.

    For the third week in a row, then, Hollywood experts will be tearing their hair out, wondering if a formerly sure-fire leading man (Will Smith two weeks ago, Vince Vaughn last week, and now Liam Neeson) has permanently lost his mojo. In each case, despite a recent downward trend, the funeral arrangements seem premature. True, it’s not hard to see why Neeson’s career appears to be in trouble. Nonetheless, “Run All Night” had a particular set of problems that can account for its failure, meaning it’s too soon to write Neeson off just yet.

    Here’s what went wrong with “Run All Night.”

    The Premise: A world-weary Neeson is forced to pull out his guns to protect his adult child from abductors and killers. Sounds like the “Taken” movies, the most recent of which was in theaters just two months ago. Plus, “Run” was directed by Jaume Collet-Serra, who directed Neeson’s thrillers “Unknown” and “Non-Stop.” So if the action beats seemed familiar, maybe there was a reason.

    The Marketing: “Run” is supposed to be a gritty, nocturnal New York City thriller. So why does the trailer show Neeson, in apparent daylight, shooting a rifle in the forest? Is he going after antagonist Ed Harris or hunting Bambi?

    The Timing: Speaking of baffling marketing decisions, why was the film’s release date moved from April to March? In April, it would have faced off against the admittedly formidable “Fast & Furious” franchise (“Furious 7” opens April 3), but not much else. Besides, those movies skew younger than Neeson’s do. In March, however, he’s facing off against a saturated market for movies aimed at older guys, from Will Smith’s caper “Focus” to VInce Vaughn’s old-dog-new-tricks comedy “Unfinished Business” to Sean Penn’s similar thriller “The Gunman” (opening next weekend). Not to mention competing against himself; couldn’t the studio have put another month of breathing room between “Taken 3” and “Run”? Hey, maybe these older leading men aren’t having slumps; maybe they’re just having trouble competing against each other (or themselves) for the same audience.

    The Reviews: “Run” earned very good word-of-mouth (as indicated by its A- grade at CinemaScore), so those fans who saw it liked it. But critics weren’t as fond; it got a 59 out of 100 score at both Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes. Unfortunately for the film, its target demographic — people old enough to be fans of both Liam Neeson and Ed Harris — still cares what critics say, even more than recommendations from friends.

    The ‘Cinderella’ Factor: There was no way the Disney fairy tale wasn’t going to steal the box office thunder of every other movie this weekend. First off, ever since “Alice in Wonderland” five years ago, Disney has perfected a template for releasing lavish live-action fairy tale adaptations in the spring. Second, the title has more built-in familiarity than last year’s “Maleficent,” “Oz the Great and Powerful,” or even “Alice.” Third, the reviews were strong, as was the word-of-mouth (measured by an A grade at CinemaScore). And fourth, the movie had the eagerly anticipated short “Frozen Fever” tacked on, just in case the feature wasn’t a big enough draw for princess-loving little girls and tweens. The movie couldn’t miss, and it didn’t. Even without the benefit of 3D surcharges, it still opened bigger than “Maleficent,” which did have 3D and a better release date (in May) but still came in just a hair behind “Cinderella” with $69.4 million.

    Bad Luck: A year ago, Neeson had a sizable hit with “Non-Stop,” which opened at $28.9 million on its way to a $92.2 million domestic gross. Since then, however, he’s had three disappointments in a row: September’s “A Walk Among the Tombstones” (which still opened higher than “Run,” with $12.8 million, though it finished with just $26.3 million), “Taken 3” (which had the misfortune of competing against “American Sniper,” a bigger smash than anyone had anticipated, and which finished with the lowest take of any of the “Taken” movies, and yet which still earned a solid $88.4 million), and now “Run.”

    Still, this slump looks worse than it is. “Tombstones” earned another $26.8 million abroad, for a global total of $53.2 million; not bad for an arty thriller that cost a reported $28 million to make. “Taken 3” still earned another $201.1 million overseas, for a worldwide total of $289.5 million. Lots of stars would kill for that kind of disappointment.

    Overseas figures aren’t in yet for “Run,” but there’s no reason to assume, if Neeson’s pattern holds true, that the film won’t make at least half its money abroad. Like many leading men, Neeson has a big enough following in the rest of the world to keep the 62-year-old star cracking skulls as long as he wants.%Slideshow-181631%

  • ‘Beauty and the Beast’ Gets Josh Gad

    Premiere Of Screen Gems' Things are coming up Disney for Josh Gad this week. Hot on the heels of yesterday’s “Frozen 2” news comes word that he’s very close to signing on the dotted line for the role of LeFou in Disney’s upcoming live action version of “Beauty and the Beast,” with Emma Watson as Belle, Dan Stevens as the Beast, and Luke Evans as Gaston. It’s safe to assume that this deal is a go, given Gad’s tweet earlier today.

    LeFou is Gaston’s dorky sidekick, and although Gaston treats him like garbage, LeFou is unwaveringly loyal and always ready to cheer up his bro or help out with a nefarious plan. Both Gaston and LeFou were written for the original animated Disney film.

    It’s a good move to get Gad on board, especially since he’s got mad musical chops. Gad snagged a Tony Award nomination for his role in “The Book of Mormon,” and he took home a Grammy with the rest of his “Mormon” team for 2012’s Best Musical Theater album. And even though we usually associate Evans with 3D blockbusters, he can also carry a tune or two. Watson, on the other hand, sounds a bit nervous about singing onscreen. As for Stevens? Well, maybe he’ll be a ringer. That Matthew Crawley is a man of many hidden talents.

    “Beauty and the Beast” will be directed by Bill Condon. Meanwhile, you can catch Gad on the FX show “The Comedians,” and in the Sony animated feature “Pixels” this summer.

    [Via The Hollywood Reporter]

    %Slideshow-221076%

  • The Top 5 Reasons to See Disney’s ‘Cinderella’ This Weekend

    Lily James in Disney's CinderellaDisney’s “Cinderella,” a live-action version of the classic tale starring Lily James as the titular heroine, premieres today. Judging by the trailers, the movie will be excellent. It seems like a perfect throwback to one of the most iconic Disney animated films of all time, while still presenting a new and fresh spin on the old story.

    Here are the top five reasons to go out this weekend and see “Cinderella” in theaters this weekend.

    1. The movie has a stellar cast
    From Cate Blanchett as the wicked stepmother to Helena Bonham Carter as the Fairy Godmother, “Cinderella” features a fabulous array of actors. Fans of “Downton Abbey” are sure to enjoy this movie in particular. Lily James is the star, and she plays flighty cousin Rose on the popular British show. Sophie McShera, who portrays the kitchen maid Daisy on “Downton Abbey,” is one of the stepsisters. I’m particularly excited to see Richard Madden, most famous for playing Robb Stark on “Game of Thrones,” act as the charming Prince. It’s good to know that somewhere in the universe, Robb Stark gets to live happily ever after (emphasis on the “live”).

    2. Kenneth Branagh is the director
    Branagh is a brilliant director, perhaps most famous for his film adaptations of Shakespearean plays such as “Much Ado About Nothing” (1993) and “Hamlet” (1996). He also directed “Thor” (2011), bringing dramatic flair to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Branagh’s experience as an actor in and director for numerous Shakespeare adaptations will hopefully translate well into the storytelling of “Cinderella,” putting a theatrical spin on a classic tale.

    3. The film is beautiful
    A fairy tale should look and feel fantastical, and “Cinderella” seems to have the perfect aesthetic. From the beautiful costumes, designed by Sandy Powell, to Haris Zambarloukos’s stunning cinematography, the movie will be as visually pleasing as it is entertaining.

    4. It will remind viewers of their childhoods
    Disney’s 1950 animated “Cinderella” is one of the most well-known children’s movies of all time, and for good reason: it’s as charming as the prince who falls in love with Cinderella. Watching the new “Cinderella” will be a nostalgic experience for viewers, but it will also give them a new perspective on the classic tale. It will be fun for parents who were raised on the old animated film to show their kids this new version. It will also be a fun break for college students like me, a chance to revisit childhood days before midterms and deadlines.

    5. “Cinderella” is the perfect spring film
    This winter has been especially brutal, especially for the Northeast. It seemed like every week had a new storm and more snow. At long last the ice is beginning to thaw, and there is hope for the summer. “Cinderella” is premised on the power of hope, and goodness, and it is therefore the perfect film for spring. As flowers begin to appear and new life is breathed into the world, it will be good to watch a movie full of wonder where new life is breathed into an old tale.

    Grace Segers is a student at Tufts University and a contributor to Moviefone’s Campus Beat. Are you a current college student with a love for all things movies and TV? Contribute to Campus Beat!
    %Slideshow-271113%

  • #TBT: Disney Premieres of the Past

    %Slideshow-271104%
    Cinderella” hits theaters this Friday, so in honor of Disney’s latest, this week’s #TBT is a look back at some star-studded premieres from the past six decades. From “Sleeping Beauty” to “Freaky Friday,” we’ve rounded up some Disney red carpet throwback moments you won’t want to miss. Look out for choice photos of 98 Degrees at the height of their fame, teenaged Anne Hathaway, and a very young Kendall Jenner…

  • ‘Frozen Fever’ Is a ‘Thank You’ to Fans, Say Directors Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck (EXCLUSIVE)

    %Slideshow-265160%
    Disney’s “Frozen” is a bona fide phenomenon. It’s become the highest-grossing animated film of all time, spawned oodles of merchandise, and is currently being spun off as theme park attractions, Broadway musicals, Disney-on-Ice spectaculars and, we’re assuming, a line of high-end Olaf-flavored snow cones. The latest piece of the “Frozen” puzzle, however, is the dazzling new seven-minute short “Frozen Fever” that makes its debut attached to “Cinderella” starting this weekend.

    The short is centered around Anna’s birthday; Elsa, having spent so many years in seclusion, wants it to be perfect. But since she’s come down with a cold, things don’t go exactly as planned. (We’ll keep things vague — we don’t want to spoil a second if it!) The entire “Frozen” team returns for the short, from voice talents Kristen Bell, Idina Menzel, Jonathan Groff, and Josh Gad, to songwriters Bobby and Kristen Lopez (yes, there’s another insidiously infectious song to worm its way into your brain) to much of the animation team, led by returning directors Jennifer Lee and Chris Buck.

    We were able to chat with Lee and Buck about where the short came from, how close it was to not getting finished, what their favorite piece of “Frozen” merchandise is, and how the “Frozen” ride at EPCOT in Walt Disney World is shaping up.

    Moviefone: When did you first start thinking about this short?

    Chris Buck: The idea of doing a short came up last spring. We were talking to John Lasseter about it, too, and it really seemed like a “thank you” to all of the fans. Just a short little thing like this, and we got excited about that. We were a little tired after the feature and the months after, so not until we really sat down in a room with our head story artists and started brainstorming about what it could be did we get excited. And then one of our story artists, Mark Smith, came to me and said, “What if Elsa got a cold?” And we all went, “Hmmm, okay!” We didn’t get a chance to have much fun with Elsa in the feature so this was the chance. We all got really excited.

    Was there any discussion about what to use in the short and what to hold back for potential sequels or follow-ups?

    Jennifer Lee: No, I think, obviously, this is coming from us and Bobby and Kristen Lopez too, we know the “Frozen” characters very well, we know what they would and wouldn’t do, we know the choices they would make and things we don’t want to happen and we obviously stay true to that. But the bigger thing was just making sure we were creatively open and saying “What if?” and shaking things up a bit. We had to get everything that happened with “Frozen” out of our heads just so we could think, What would Anna do? What would Elsa do? And staying true to them and exploring things like how Elsa and Kristoff had never talked to each other in the feature so that would be nice to see, so we did. But being that short and being that it takes place in one day, it wouldn’t take away from the fun people were having about where these characters were going next.

    Can you talk about developing the look of “Frozen Fever”? It’s kind of fun to see the kingdom with a springier color scheme.

    Buck: We got a lot of our team back together to do the film, so our art director was back and we gave it that “Frozen” look. He’s great with color and design so we wanted to stay true to the original and Arendelle. So it’s pretty much Arendelle set in the summertime and how beautiful that could be. That was it. Instead of the wintery color scheme from the movie we got to play with more summery stuff.

    What was it like working with the Lopezes again? They’re obviously a huge part of the make-up of the franchise’s success.

    Lee: Well, what’s nice is that we worked very, very intensely with them for a good 14 to 15 months and shaped the story with them, so we had a shorthand throwing out story ideas and giving them the broad strokes of where we were going and supporting that with visual gags and things. And they find the hook — that song that they can write that resonates. We hit a nice balance, since the song is quite sincere and it’s the emotion of the film; it’s the girls, it’s their relationship, and the visuals support it with playfulness. And that’s what we’ve done a lot with them. It was a bit of a groove that we came to know, which was very helpful. But we also couldn’t imagine doing it without them. They know these characters as well as we do.

    How difficult was it to get this short done on time?

    Buck: It was tight. We started working on it last June. That was just coming up with the idea. And production-wise, we had to squeeze in at the end of “Big Hero 6,” before the animators started in on the next one. Everybody wanted to work on it. A lot of the animators had such a good time on the first one that they came to us and said, “Can I just do one scene?” And even our head animator on Olaf came back and did one scene.

    Lee: So we have a lot of animators on this because everyone said, “Can I just do one?” That meant a lot to us — that people wanted to come back. The concern in the beginning was always, Will it be good enough? Will it do it justice? Do you have the creative energy to do it? So we couldn’t put it into production until we had found it. So the summer was pretty intense in terms of getting it right or getting it to where it could go with animation. The song came about pretty quickly, which helped. But we were recording voices in August and we had just sat down with it in June. But we tend to work that way — really intense, really fast.

    This movie has clearly taken on a life of its own. What is your favorite bit of “Frozen”-related merchandise?

    Lee: Ooooo…

    Buck: Uhhhh…

    Lee: Could it be good or bad? My mind is now spinning.

    Buck: For the bad, the bad would be that there was a Halloween costume for women… It was Olaf…

    Lee: Sexy Olaf.

    Buck: That would probably be my favorite bad one. I don’t think it was Disney sanctioned. It was pretty impressive though.

    Lee: For good I think to the thing that inspired a lot of eBay price fights, which were the dresses. Because when I was growing up as a girl, they didn’t have these. They didn’t have the Disney Princess dresses. And I was obsessed with “Cinderella” and making dresses out of my mom’s slips and things.

    Buck: You said the mice were helping you with that!

    Lee: So particularly Elsa’s dress, every time I saw a little girl in that, I could just feel how they were feeling and how much they were enjoying throwing their arms out and pretending to make snow. That doesn’t get old.

    “Frozen” will be a franchise that will go on for many years. How do you delegate shepherding the “Frozen” brand with working on other projects of your own?

    Lee: I’ll let you know once we figure out how to do it right. It’s a challenge, and it’s a good challenge to have. We can be quite tired, but I would say that’s a champagne problem to have this amount of support creatively from Disney on all fronts — the musical, the “Wrinkle in Time” animation, the parks; just the fact that they want us from us keeps us going, even when we’re tired.

    Buck: What’s great too is that they’ve actually asked us to hop on these things. Sometimes in the past, once you finish the film, you hand it over and that was it. That was the last time you had any input that came after the film, so it’s nice that we’re asked and are able to tell them what worked, what didn’t work, and give them some advice in keeping them true. It helps to keep the integrity of these characters and this property.

    You brought up the parks. What’s the status of the Norway ride at EPCOT and how’s it coming along?

    Buck: I’m not sure of the date, I think spring of next year. It’s looking very, very good. We’ve been in on the early designing and I’m excited by the look of it.

    Lee: Chris has been working with them daily, and I of course threw up when they showed us the 3D version in the simulator. So I’m not going anywhere near it.

    Buck: It’s going to have real state-of-the-art audio animatoronics and it’s going to look amazing.

    What has it been like seeing the characters embraced at the parks?

    Buck: Oh, it’s crazy. Especially when you see the response with the meet-and-greet characters. I was walking by the meet-and-greet at Disneyland last summer, when the lines were extremely long, and I was with someone and they said, “You should tell them you’re the director.” And it’s like this four-hour line of parents and kids, and I said, “I’m not going to tell anyone I had anything to do with it.”
    Elsa celebrates Anna's birthday by throwing a party full of surprises and presents, including summer dresses, until Elsa's icy powers have a few unintended consequences. The all-new Walt Disney Animation Studios short

  • The 25 Best Live-Action Fairy Tale Movies Ever, Ranked

    %Slideshow-271113%
    Is Disney’s new “Cinderella,” which opens this Friday, March 13, a little late to the ball? Given the current vogue for live-action adaptations of fairy tales — a trend that Disney launched with “Enchanted” and kicked into overdrive with “Alice In Wonderland,” “Oz the Great and Powerful,” and “Maleficent” — it’s a wonder that “Cinderella” didn’t arrive sooner.

    The trend certainly makes good business sense; live-action fairy tales tend to be based on stories every child already knows, so there’s brand familiarity, and they also tend to be public domain, so the screen rights are free. The hard part, though, is execution, generating a fantasy world and magical characters who live up to the versions we’ve all imagined to ourselves during bedtime readings. Digital effects have finally allowed live-action versions of fairy tales to be as visually imaginative as the Disney animated adaptations have been.

    Then again, the history of cinema is full of live-action fairy tales that create wondrous worlds even with primitive effects achieved entirely through camera trickery or even 19th-century stagecraft. A little suspension of disbelief is all you need to enjoy these films, the best live-action fairy tales from a century of cinema.best live-action fairy-tale movies

  • Richard Madden on ‘Cinderella,’ the Red Wedding, and His Sci-Fi Fantasy (EXCLUSIVE)

    'Cinderella' Press Conference - 65th Berlinale International Film FestivalChances are you know Game of Thrones.” As one of the members of the besieged Stark clan, Madden stood tall while facing certain death. That’s a tough thing to play, especially when you’re so handsome.

    Madden is bringing his handsomeness and his history with fantasy to Disney’s new, live-action “Cinderella,” directed by Kenneth Branagh, and co-starring Lily James and Cate Blanchett. In this version, Madden plays a kinder, gentler Prince Charming, one that Cinderella actually meets before the ball. Yes, there are complex new dimensions to this “Cinderella.” And it is glorious.

    We got on the phone and spoke to Madden about what it was like going from dark fantasy to light fantasy (and what the reaction was to “Game of Thrones’” infamous Red Wedding), whether or not it was fun to play with fairy tale conventions, and grill him on his jock strap (he recently went on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” to discuss). He also tells us that he’s dying to be in a movie with spaceships or dinosaurs or both. Struggling Hollywood screenwriters, you have your newest assignment.

    Moviefone: What was it like going from the dark fantasy world of “Game of Thrones” to the much happier, cheerier fantasy world of “Cinderella”?

    Richard Madden: It was a relief. It was nice to be a part of something with a happy ending, where I’m not constantly worried that somebody is going to slaughter my family.

    While we’re on the subject, were you taken aback by how people responded to The Red Wedding?

    Absolutely. I’m always surprised. Because for me I just shot this TV show in Ireland and suddenly it’s this massive TV show and people really care about it. It’s quite wonderful, actually, because it means you’re doing something right if that many people watch it and care about it and get upset when characters die.

    Were you a fan of the original animated “Cinderella”? And what’s your favorite Disney animated movie?

    My favorite one is “Aladdin.” But I grew up with two sisters so I watched all of these movies and knew them inside out and knew all the songs. But I loved the original animated “Cinderella.” I love our version much more though because of the modernization and the message that we’re giving. It’s a message that she isn’t just a damsel in distress who needs a man to save her from her life. She’s an independent, brave woman, and the Prince and Cinderella bring out the best in each other. I think that’s a much better story than the original animation.

    Was it fun playing with these conventions?

    Absolutely. I just love to be able to actually build a character. In the original animation he’s maybe in two or three scenes. You don’t even get to know his name whereas in this story you get to see him as a son and a soldier and as a friend as well as a Prince to Cinderella. It was really fun to build a character from scratch.

    I imagine every actor wants to work with Kenneth Branagh.

    Absolutely.

    What was that experience like?

    He’s inspirational. It was like taking a master class every day in acting and just how to conduct yourself and me and him and Lily have a great chemistry together, and a great working relationship and we’re working together in 2016. Lily and I are playing Romeo and Juliet on stage, and Kenneth is directing on the West End in London. Doing Shakespeare on stage with Kenneth Branagh, I don’t think it gets better than that.

    Did he push you as an actor?

    Oh, he pushed me every day. He would give me books on a weekly basis to read and he was always pushing to get the best out of me. He’s super intelligent and also a total gentleman.

    The costumes in this movie are incredible.

    Yeah, I get to wear some cool stuff. It was great because I had these conversations with [costume designer] Sandy Powell where I wanted to retain the masculinity for the Prince and I thought the costumes were a great opportunity to do that even though they’re really decadent costumes. I went slightly white when I saw the ball outfit because it’s very white with sequins and glitter and I was going, “This isn’t very masculine.” But it actually makes you feel very regal and empowers. It’s really very special.

    You were on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” the other night talking about how hard it was to find the right jock strap for your character. Was Branagh involved in what underwear you guys were wearing?

    Yes! Branagh is involved in every detail. He’s got such an eye for detail for things right down to the jock strap, where we had to get it right. So a lot of time and thought went into it, and Sandy Powell was such an extraordinary costume designer; you’re in safe hands.

    What was it like working with Cate?

    Well, not only is she stunningly beautiful but she’s also a proper movie star in every sense of it. The way she conducts herself on set is just a joy to watch. It’s like a master class, every day, being on set.

    Did you go to drama school coming up?

    Yeah, I went to drama school in Scotland.

    So this was drama graduate school?

    Yes! Exactly!

    You’re now a famous Disney character. How would you feel about the Richard Madden version of Prince Charming walking around Disneyland?

    A-ha! That would be quite cool! I could go and see him. That’ll be me if I don’t get another job lined up.

    And your next movie, “Columbus Day,” is a modern thriller, right?

    Yes. I actually get to wear jeans and a T-shirt for a change, instead of armor, like I’m used to.

    What can you tell us about that?

    It’s a thriller and it’s action and it’s me and Idris Elba, which I think is funny because it’s such an odd pairing as a couple of actors. But it’s hopefully got a bit of humor and tension and drama and it’s got some exciting pieces. And it was just a thrill to be able to do something that is so different than anything I’ve ever done before.

    Is “Romeo and Juliet” going to be traditional period as well?

    That will all be revealed in time.

    Is there a genre you’re particularly looking to tackle next?

    Sci-fi! I’m dying to do something sci-fi! I would love to be on a spaceship and firing a laser gun! Something like that would be really awesome. Or something with dinosaurs. Or preferably both at once.

    They’re restarting “Jurassic Park” and “Star Wars.” You could get into one of those movies.

    Yeah, well… Maybe a “Star Wars”/”Jurassic Park” mash-up is something I could do in the future.

    “Cinderella” is in theaters March 13th.
    %Slideshow-266421%

  • Hot Rumor: ‘Tron 3’ Will Start Filming This Fall With Garrett Hedlund

    US- ENTERTAINMENT-CRITICS CHOICE AWARDS-ARRIVALS
    Dust off your LED suit and get ready to go back to the Grid, because the word on the street is that “Tron 3” is filming this fall.

    According to Vancouver’s VancityBuzz blog, “Tron 3” will begin filming on October 5, 2015, with Garrett Hedlund attached to reprise his role as Sam Flynn. Badass Digest got confirmation from a trusted source in the industry that the movie is a go, with “TRON: Legacy” director Joseph Kosinski returning as well. During an interview for “Oblivion” in 2012, Kosinski said, “I’ve said it would have to be our ‘Empire Strikes Back for me to come back and for me to pull the whole team back together. I think we do have that idea. We do have the idea that feels big and really blows the doors off this franchise.”

    It makes sense that Kosinski would return for another run, but Hedlund’s run of dramatic roles in a range of films from “On the Road” to “Unbroken” is serving his career really well. He’s got the William Monahan thriller “Mojave” coming out in April, Joe Wright’s “Pan” in July, and he just signed on for Ang Lee’s “Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk,” although it’s unclear when that will begin filming. Perhaps the lure of the Grid is all too real.

    [Via io9]

    %Slideshow-270097%

  • Tim Burton to Direct Live-Action ‘Dumbo’ for Disney

    An Evening With The Director And Cast Of
    Tim Burton will once again spin live-action fairy tale magic for Disney: The director is set to helm a new version of “Dumbo.”

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Burton, who also directed “Alice in Wonderland” for the studio, will take the reins of the in-development “Dumbo,” which is set to be a mixture of live actors and computer-generated effects. The 1941 animated classic centered on a young circus elephant who’s ridiculed for his large ears, which give him the ability to fly.

    Sean Bailey, president of production for Walt Disney Pictures, revealed little about the story for the new flick to WSJ, saying only, “It’s a big world.”

    “Dumbo” is just the latest Disney classic to get the live-action treatment, with “Alice” leading the charge in 2010, “Cinderella” due in theaters this weekend, and “Beauty and the Beast” set for a tentative 2017 release. No word yet on when “Dumbo” is expected to premiere.

    [via: Wall Street Journal]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-497%