Tag: david-fincher

  • 16 Things You Never Knew About David Fincher’s ‘Panic Room’

    While promoting “Panic Room” before its release 15 years ago this week (on March 29, 2002), director David Fincher made a distinction between his “films” (arty works like “Fight Club“) and his “movies” — popcorn crowd-pleasers, which is what he considered “Panic Room.”

    Nonetheless, “Panic Room” feels like more than just a brutally efficient thrill machine. It’s an intricate puzzle box and a psychological probe of our darkest impulses and fears, one that gave Jodie Foster one of her biggest hits and Kristen Stewart her first big break. It’s all the more amazing in that, given its troubled production history, the movie even got made.

    Let’s celebrate it’s decade-and-a-half anniversary with some trivia movie fans should know.
    1. After the mind-bending complexity of “Fight Club,” Fincher (above, right) wanted an easier project, and he thought he’d found one with David Koepp‘s “Panic Room” script, since almost all of the movie is set inside a single townhouse. But the shoot turned out to be anything but easy.

    2. Fincher wasn’t the first choice to direct. Initially, the producers had offered the gig to Ridley Scott, then to Forest Whitaker, who chose instead to take on the role of ambivalent burglar Burnham.
    3. The first and biggest roadblock was the casting of the leading lady. Nicole Kidman was originally set to play Meg, the role Jodie Foster would take over. But Kidman had to bow out after two weeks when she aggravated a knee injury she’d suffered while making “Moulin Rouge.”

    4. Reportedly up for consideration to replace her were Sandra Bullock, Angelina Jolie, and Robin Wright. Ultimately, the filmmakers hired Foster, giving her only a week to prepare for the shoot.
    5. Swapping Foster for Kidman changed the nature of the character. “It’s like Hitchcock casting Grace Kelly,” Fincher said of Kidman. “It’s about glamour and physicality. With Jodie Foster, it’s more about what happens in her eyes. It’s more political. Jodie is someone who has spent 35 years making choices that define her as a woman and define women in film. Jodie Foster is nobody’s f—ing pet, nobody’s trophy wife.”

    6. Kidman can still be heard in the final film, however. When Foster’s Meg calls her ex-husband (Patrick Bauchau), his new lady — voiced by Kidman — answers the phone. And you’re welcome for that little Easter egg.
    7. Similarly, daughter Sarah underwent major changes. Initially cast was Hayden Panettiere, but when she dropped out, the filmmakers replaced her with Stewart and made the character more tomboyish, to play up the contrast with Kidman’s Meg. After Foster replaced Kidman, however, Sarah was rewritten to become more frail and vulnerable.

    8. There were some changes behind-the-camera, as well. Fincher had hoped to use Darius Khondji, the cinematographer behind Fincher’s “Seven,” but the director and the lensman clashed over creative decisions. Fincher asserted control, Khondji left, and the less experienced Conrad W. Hall, son of famous DP Conrad Hall (“American Beauty”), replaced him.

    9. Foster added one more speed bump to the production. Or should we say baby bump? Well into the shoot, she was visibly pregnant, which is why there are a number of shots of the actress wearing a sweater. Even so, part of the shoot had to be postponed until after Foster gave birth.
    10. As Raoul, the frightening leader of the burglars, Fincher initially wanted to cast Maynard James Keenan, lead singer of Tool, with whom the director had worked on a music video. Eventually, he selected another musician, Dwight Yoakam (above, right), inspired by the country singer’s villainous performance in “Sling Blade.”

    11. “Seven” screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker has a cameo as a drowsy neighbor.
    12. Most of the filming took place on a set built inside a soundstage near Manhattan Beach in California. Designed for maximum freedom of camera movement, the set cost $6 million to construct. But Fincher’s fluid use of the camera, combined with the necessity of shooting many scenes twice (the second time for their appearance on the panic room’s security monitors), ended up requiring nearly 2,100 camera shot setups, resulting in one of the lengthiest shoots of Fincher’s career.

    13. Of course, Fincher’s own notorious perfectionism also lengthened the shoot. For one five-second scene, when Raoul attacks Meg and forces her to drop Sarah’s medical kit, Fincher ordered more than 100 takes, so that the kit would land in frame and in focus, and so that it would be clear that she loses it and doesn’t merely toss it away.
    14. “Panic Room” cost a reported $48 million to make. It earned back $96 million in North America and another $100 million throughout the rest of the world.

    15. Some critics saw a 9/11 metaphor in “Panic Room,” with its plot about thugs invading and wreaking havoc on a supposedly secure Manhattan home. But that was just an accident of timing, since principal photography was finished before the Sept. 2001 attacks.
    16. In the end, working in a confined space drove the filmmakers as crazy as it did the characters. When Entertainment Weekly asked him in 2004 what lessons he learned from making “Panic Room,” Fincher said, “Don’t shoot for 100 days in one place, that’s what’s to be learned from that. Figure out ways not to.” He added, “They probably had that same kind of problem on ‘The Shining‘ — that’s all in one house. [But] at least they get out, they get to run through a maze.”

  • Jake Gyllenhaal Talks ‘Life,’ ‘Okja,’ and the 10th Anniversary of ‘Zodiac’

    Life,” the brand-new science-fiction thriller about a crew of unlucky astronauts (led by Ryan Reynolds, Rebecca Ferguson, and Jake Gyllenhaal) who pick up a soil sample from Mars that isn’t just soil, will scare the hell out of you. It’s an unrelenting, terror-filled journey into the deepest, most uncomfortable parts of space exploration and an absolutely thrilling time at the movies.

    I was lucky enough to chat with Gyllenhaal the morning after the movie’s uproarious SXSW world premiere, where we talked about getting drawn to the project, what it was like shooting the movie, and whether or not he’d return for a sequel. I also had to ask him about “Zodiac,” one of his very best performances (and one of the very best movies, well, ever) and an upcoming movie I’m very excited about, “Okja,” due out on Netflix this summer.

    Moviefone: This is the first time you’ve done a movie like this. Had you always wanted to do something in the space/horror genre?

    Jake Gyllenhaal: No, if you ever talk to me I don’t have any specific desire to do any particular type of film. It mostly has to do with the community of people you work with and the opportunity to play around and explore. And [director] Daniel Espinosa is very particular in that way and really allows for that type of exploration. That was a promise he made. That was part of it, along with a terrifying script. And Seamus McGarvey was already shooting it and we had some incredible department heads so I thought, Hey, these people are going to do some very interesting things with this idea.

    Daniel has said that part of the appeal was the Janet Leigh aspect of getting rid of a major character early. Was that fun to play around with as well?

    Absolutely. I think those qualities that the movie has are great and subverting things is always fun. There are so many things that are really trying to pander and in a lot of ways this is pure entertainment but in that space it’s always fun to f*ck around.

    What was it like shooting the movie?

    Oh, it was fun. Being on wires every day, we came in and didn’t have to wear shoes and wore jumpsuits. It was the easiest costume to put on and take off. You fly around on wires every day … There are definitely physical strains on your body at a certain age that aren’t always fun. It was claustrophobic and there are some tense moments when you’re trying to create those things but ultimately it was really fun. Daniel is lovely and his attitude is great and he has a great sense of humor. It was a wonderful, great cast that was very humble and happy to be there. I haven’t been on many movies with such a lovely process.

    Did they show you what the monster was going to look like, or was it pure speculation on your end?

    They more showed us where it would be. Daniel wanted us to use own own imaginations. And we had these ear pieces in, where our characters could communicate with each other in the movie but Daniel could get on there and he would tell us to look at things or turn our heads in different directions and explain to us what was happening. It was a strange discovery as we went. We had kind of an idea of what Calvin would look like and what he’d change into but it was mostly our imagination.

    What did you think when you finally saw it? Did it line up at all?

    It changes, so I think in that way, as it grows and behaves that way … It was a little bit of both. But definitely f*cking scary.

    The writers of “Life” have talked about being open to a sequel. Is that something you’d be open to if called upon?

    Always! I’ve never done that before but always!It’s the 10th anniversary of “Zodiac” this year. Looking back on the process — and with some distance — what was that experience like?

    Oh man … It was life-changing and career-changing, and to work with David Fincher and to have that experience was extraordinary. I was very young at the time and thought very highly of myself, which has absolutely changed. When you’re that age and you’re not even so clear about the kind of geniuses I was working with — performers, filmmakers, all the crew around me. It was definitely such a dark movie to create and make and so ambitious in a lot of ways. Not necessarily in the ways we consider films ambitious but in this very subversive film that I think is ahead of its time and is a classic in a lot of ways. It’s an honor.

    It’s great, too, that people still talk about it. Has the fact that it has remained, even after getting a lackluster initial release, surprised you at all?

    No. David hadn’t made a movie in a while when he made that, and I remember the script was a certain way. It was 100 pages when it was written, and when he got on it became 180. He knew about it before, obviously, but as he tried to shape the movie he was trying to figure out who this person was, even to the day we were shooting it, up until the end of shooting, to see if we could find out who the Zodiac Killer was.

    Really?

    Yeah! The thing that is incredible about David is that he’s really not afraid of these corners of the world, and he wanted to figure it out as much as all the characters in the movie want to figure it out. I think that need, that want, that desire, that ache is in the movie because it’s his ache. He grew up with the Zodiac Killer in his hometown, so all of those things run very deep inside him and they run in the movie and that’s what I think makes it so special.

    You have another movie that is coming out that I am so excited for: “Okja.” What can you tell us about that movie and what was it like working with Bong Joon-ho?

    Well, again, another brilliant mind. He’s a true visionary, from his early movies in Korea to the movies he’s ventured out with a more international cast. He’s so incredible to work with and he’s such a visual artist so, in a way, you’re just fitting into this painting. But he also loves the idea of absurdity and creation, so in terms of creating a character with him it’s truly inspiring and so fun. The creature he’s created is beautiful, and I think he’s created a story in the vein of the classics we love; I’d say things like “Pan’s Labyrinth” and “E.T.,” where you watch the journey of a child growing up and moving to adulthood in a way that’s really beautiful and heartbreaking and moving.

    I can’t say enough wonderful things about it. There’s no one I know working today that has the agility with tone that he has — visually, with humor. There are moments in the movie where I’m crying and then immediately start laughing, and I found myself crying and laughing at the same time. There’s something about him. Maybe it’s his understanding of all of our cultures, his understanding of the connection between all of us in the world and where similarities exist. But, man, is that man a craftsperson and I love him as a person and it was a joy to work with him. I can’t wait for you to see the movie.

    “Life” is in theaters Friday.

  • Here’s Angelina Jolie’s Classy Response to Leaked ‘Spoiled Brat’ E-mails

    WSJ. Magazine 2015 Innovator Awards - ArrivalsAngelina Jolie Pitt is currently promoting her new movie “By the Sea,” which she wrote, directed, produced, and stars in alongside husband Brad Pitt. But while the New York Times had her handy, they asked for her reaction to those hacked Sony e-mails.

    You may remember the exchanges between producer Scott Rudin and Sony Pictures Entertainment co-chairman Amy Pascal, discussing the idea of Angelina Jolie wanting David Fincher to direct her in a “Cleopatra” movie.

    Gawker has a full breakdown, but at one point Rudin wrote to Pascal, “There is no movie of Cleopatra to be made (and how that is a bad thing given the insanity and rampaging ego of this woman and the cost of the movie is beyond me).” He added later, to the same e-mail, “I have zero appetite for the indulgence of spoiled brats and I will tell her this myself if you don’t.” In another e-mail, Rudin wrote of Jolie, “I’m not destroying my career over a minimally talented spoiled brat who thought nothing of shoving this off her plate for eighteen months so she could go direct a movie. […] She’s a camp event and a celebrity and that’s all and the last thing anybody needs is to make a giant bomb with her that any fool could see coming.” Yikes.

    So the NY Times asked Angelina Jolie if she was surprised when she read “the bruising exchange” about her between Amy Pascal and Scott Rudin. Jolie said she didn’t real the emails, but she knew what was in them. Here’s her response:

    Someone told me. There are certain things that bother me and certain things that don’t. Personal attacks on me? I think I’m just so used to it. Honestly, my first instinct was that I was worried about Amy. I had someone call her and ask if she was O.K. Not because I’m a saint, but because I think we have to look at the bigger picture. She’s got kids. I knew it was going to unravel for her.”

    Sony Pictures Classic 68th Annual Golden Globe Awards PartyThat’s a classy reaction, but considering most of the vitriol was from Scott Rudin, it’s not too shocking to see her take the high road. It’s also in keeping with her aim to stay positive instead of negative, when it comes to everything, including gender discrimination in Hollywood. As she put it at one point in the Times interview:

    I just think that sometimes people in the business focus on the fact that you’re a minority. I don’t want people saying, “Should we get a female director?” I want to hear, “Should we get a great director for this movie?” But I’m the first female director that Brad’s ever worked with. That doesn’t seem right when you think about it. […] Sexism is part of every industry and must be addressed. But I try not to focus on the negative but the positive side of what we can bring. I want to support other women because of the opportunities I’ve had — and I’ve had a lot of opportunities. What I try as a female director is to do the best job I can and in the meantime bring attention to as many other female directors and writers as I can. Right now I am producing “The Breadwinner,” an animated film about Afghanistan. Nora Twomey is the director.”

    Good for her. Considering all she’s accomplished on- and especially off-screen, “spoiled brat” seems like the least apt description.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-338515%

  • Directors Dish: Actor Tried to Punch Joe Wright, David Fincher Once Did 107 Takes

    This one is for the real cinephiles. Empire asked Bond director Sam Mendes to guest edit the “Spectre” issue and he launched a massive Q&A with fellow A-ist directors, talking to Steven Spielberg, David Fincher, Ang Lee, Edgar Wright, Alfonso Cuaron, Joe Wright, Paul Greengrass, Joss Whedon, Rob Marshall, Sofia Coppola, Susanne Bier, George Clooney, Alexander Payne, Roger Michell, and Christopher Nolan. He got those famous names to candidly (and often hilariously) answer questions including…

    • “Have you ever walked off a set in a temper?”
    • “What is the most common phrase you use on set?”
    • “Music or no music on set?”
    • “What’s the most takes you’ve ever done?”
    • “How many cups of coffee a day?”
    • “What’s your best-ever day on set?”

    Here are the “most takes” responses:

    Spielberg: I did 50 takes on Robert Shaw assembling the Greener Gun on Jaws. The shark wasn’t working, so I just kept shooting to make the production report look like we were accomplishing something and to keep cast and crew from going crazy from boredom. It was a strategic indulgence.

    Soderbergh: 48.

    Fincher: 107.

    Clooney: 18.

    Nolan: I never pay attention to the number of takes.

    Edgar Wright: I don’t think I have ever gone Kubrick crazy. So maybe 20 or so… But it’s usually six or seven takes.

    Payne: Probably around 26. I’m normally a four-to- seven kind of guy, but every so often, when the actors, the operator, the dolly grip and the assistant cameramen must all work in sync, it might take a while to get right.

    Marshall: I try not to do more than seven or eight. It can become counterproductive.

    Cuarón: The long takes process doesn’t allow for that many takes. In the past I have shot over 50 takes of different shots. Sometimes you end up using take 64, sometimes take four.

    Michell: Like current Australian batsmen… Very rarely double figures.

    Lee: For acting, 13. For action, 36.

    Bier: Twenty-five, I think. Which, if you’re trying to get the best performance, is way, way too much.

    Joe Wright: Thirty-seven maybe, can’t really remember. I’m usually in the range of 12 to 16 unless it’s a very technically challenging shot.

    Coppola: I can’t remember, nothing too crazy, because we never have that much time in the schedule.

    Whedon: On an elaborate shot, 30. On a bit of dialogue, I’ve seldom gone into double digits.

    Greengrass: I don’t count over ten.

    The hard copy issue had more questions, and Collider shared the responses for “What’s your worst-ever day on set?”

    Joe Wright: The day an actor tried to punch me. I’ll say no more.

    Whedon: Buffy presentation. My first gig. Whole thing was a nightmare. At one point there was pure chaos and a total lack of confidence from all involved. I stood outside the set, wanting to slink off home and realising that if I did, if I didn’t walk in there and somehow take control, I was going to be an increasingly miserable script doctor forever. So I walked in. Worst day ended up not so bad.

    Edgar Wright: Too many. I can remember a low point on every shoot. Shaun, it was in the pub finale; we were up against it and had to cut action. Hot Fuzz, we were rained off, lost the light or night shoots went abysmally slow. Scott Pilgrim, I think there was a complicated, disastrous day of effect cues that sent me into a deep funk, and then on World’s End I remember a day where nothing went right where we ditched an entire sequence. Cue my transformation into The Sulk.

    Payne: I abhor when the actors don’t know their dialogue cold. When I have to spoon-feed dialogue to a lazy actor, I think of all the great Russian novels I could be reading instead of wasting my time. It makes me want to turn exclusively to documentaries — no hair and make-up, no second takes, and everyone knows his or her dialogue.

    Read more at Empire. Who tried to punch Joe Wright, director of the new “Pan,” “Atonement,” “Pride & Prejudice,” and “Hanna”? And do you think Fincher was just joking with the 107 or was that the exact highest number? The “Fight Club,” “Gone Girl,” “Seven,” “Benjamin Button,” “Social Network” and “Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” director is known for being a perfectionist, so it wouldn’t be a shock if the real number were even higher.


    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-328282%

  • Every David Fincher Film, Ranked From Worst to Best

    %Slideshow-324535%
    It’s been five years since the release of “The Social Network” (on October 1, 2010), and it still feels like David Fincher was robbed of the Oscar.

    His account of the birth pangs of Facebook was a movie about the way we live now, structured in a way that suited its cautionary tale about the elusiveness of truth in a system overstuffed with information. At the Academy Awards, however, Fincher’s film went up for Best Picture against “The King’s Speech,” a perfectly good but thoroughly conventional Oscar-bait movie (British period costume drama, World War II setting, protagonist who triumphs despite a handicap) and lost.

    For all the popularity of his movies, Fincher seems doomed to being seen as ahead of his time. His films seem to recognize that we’re drowning in more information than we can handle, and he seems bent on forging a visual style and editing rhythm that will help rewire our brains to handle the overload. In honor of the film’s fifth anniversary, here’s a ranking of every Fincher movie.

  • ‘Seven’: 20 Things You (Probably) Didn’t Know About David Fincher’s Classic

    Two decades later, we’re still totally creeped out by “Seven.”

    The seven-deadly-sins-inspired serial killer thriller, which opened 20 years ago this week (on September 22, 1995), helped put director David Fincher on the map and marked a career milestone for stars Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman, and Kevin Spacey. What’s more, from its jittery opening credits to its grim shocker of an ending, “Seven” has become a template for how to make a dark, suspenseful crime drama.

    Despite its many imitators, however, “Seven” maintains its secrets, from who almost starred in it to how it accomplished its unsettling effects to the softened ending that was almost tacked on. Here are some of those secrets. (Warning: Spoilers follow, though, c’mon, the movie’s 20 years old.)
    1. “Seven” screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker has a cameo. He’s the corpse seen at the beginning of the movie.

    2. Walker wrote the screenplay, his first, while living in New York City and working as a retail clerk at Tower Records. He has credited those dismal years with influencing the movie’s bleak setting and tone.

    3. Having moved to Los Angeles to become a screenwriter in earnest, Walker cold-called David Koepp, then best known as the screenwriter of “Bad Influence” and “Death Becomes Her.” (Later, he’d be the blockbuster scribe of the first two “Jurassic Park” movies and “War of the Worlds.”) Koepp liked the “Seven” script and helped Walker sell it to New Line Cinema. But the studio didn’t like the head-in-a-box ending, a sequence that would be a point of contention throughout the production.

    4. Fincher was then a music video director who’d recently made his feature debut with “Alien 3,” and he found the process so miserable that he claimed he’d rather contract colon cancer than direct another film. But then he received Walker’s screenplay and loved it. He didn’t know that New Line had mistakenly sent him the original draft, the one with the severed-head ending.

    5. Morgan Freeman was not the first choice to play William Somerset, the world-weary older detective. Walker had envisioned William Hurt as the character, whom he’d named after his favorite author, W. Somerset Maugham. The producers wanted Al Pacino, but he was committed to the film “City Hall.”
    6. Similarly, Brad Pitt was not the first choice to play Somerset’s hot-tempered partner, David Mills. But Denzel Washington and Sylvester Stallone both turned down the role.

    7. As serial killer John Doe, Kevin Spacey goes unmentioned in the opening credits. The actor’s sudden appearance — almost two-thirds into the film, not counting the mid-point chase — came as a surprise to most viewers, as critics were generally good enough to keep that spoiler out of their reviews.

    8. “Seven” was shot in Los Angeles, but to make the film’s unnamed city look as gloomy as possible, the filmmakers generated a constant stream of fake rain.

    9. Freeman called the set a “dark and unhealthy” place, and claimed Fincher developed a cough from the constant spray of water and mineral oil used to create the dank atmosphere.

    10. Also adding to the gloom was the unusual way the film negative was processed, called bleach bypass. It involved leaving the silver in the film stock during development, creating a darker, grainier print.
    11. Like Fincher, graphic designer Kyle Cooper was working on just his second film, after “Dead Presidents.” His credits for that were based on tabletop shots of paper money on fire. Seeing the word “God” burn up on a bill gave Cooper the idea of using the pages of John Doe’s notebooks to generate the opening credits for “Seven” (pictured).

    12. Once he had the footage on film, Cooper scratched the negative with fish hooks and razor blades. The disturbing result became one of the most influential opening-credit sequences in modern film history, making Cooper the most sought-after opening credit designer since Saul Bass.

    13. “Seven” is also one of the few films where the end credits crawl down instead of up.

    14. Pitt and on-screen wife Gwyneth Paltrow fell in love for real during the shoot in early 1995.

    15. Years later, Pitt claimed he had it written into his “Seven” contract that New Line keep in the final cut the head-in-a-box climax and Mills’ vengeful shooting of John Doe. Audience testing, however, made New Line squeamish about the finale. The studio still thought the decapitation of Mills’ pregnant wife too disturbing (couldn’t it just be the head of Mills’ dog, studio executives asked) and thought the character would be more heroic and likable if he refrained from shooting Doe. With the support of Pitt and Freeman, Fincher successfully argued in favor of the severed head and the shooting, but he mitigated the ending anyway. Initially, “Seven” was to end abruptly once Mills kills Doe. Instead, Fincher added the scene of the shocked Mills being taken away by his fellow cops, as well as Freeman’s final, partially reassuring voiceover.
    16. John Doe’s books — his handwritten journals documenting his street-level perceptions of humanity — were handwritten. They took two months to finish writing, and cost a rumored $15,000

    17. Ever wonder why Mills wears a cast for the back half of the film? While filming the scene where he chases John Doe in the rain, Pitt fell and his arm went through a car windshield, requiring surgery. They worked the accident into the script.

    18. Brad Pitt reportedly earned $7 million for the film.

    19. “Seven” cost a reported $33 million to make. It earned $100 million in North America, where it topped the box office chart for four straight weeks. Overseas, it earned an additional $227 million.

    20. Three months after its initial release, New Line put “Seven” back into theaters in New York and Los Angeles at Christmastime in hopes of earning Oscar nominations for the filmmakers and stars. But the film’s only Academy Award nomination came for Richard Francis-Bruce’s editing.
    %Slideshow-319062%

  • Watch Golden Globe Winner Kevin Spacey in the ‘House of Cards’ Season 3 Trailer

    Last night House of Cards” (produced by another Golden Globes nominee, David Fincher). And, as if by magic, during the commercial break following Spacey’s win, we got a lengthy, insanely moody trailer for the third season and it looks pretty tremendous.

    The trailer is incredibly quick, with only the briefest flashes of action, but it looks like there are going to be serious complications, both in Underwood’s ascension and in his relationship with his steely wife Claire (Robin Wright). Also, we noticed that the “Deep Web” hacker guy from last season is back, which is both topical and timely!

    It’s unclear whether or not this will be the final season for the all-star Netflix series, considering the British series only ran for three seasons (although the entire series ran for a total of twelve episodes), but we don’t think this is going to be the season where Underwood gets his comeuppance. Man are we longing for that comeuppance!

    %Slideshow-258675%