Marvel is gunning hard for “Black Panther” to be considered for several major awards at next month’s Oscars ceremony, while its other huge 2018 release, “Avengers: Infinity War” will only be submitted in the visual effects category. But the just-announced nominations from the Visual Effects Society Awards prove that “Infinity War” is already the early favorite to claim the Academy’s statuette.
The VES Awards nominees, announced on Tuesday, were led by “Infinity War,” which nabbed six nods from the group. It will compete against “Ready Player One,” “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” “Christopher Robin,” and “Welcome to Marwen” for the top prize, outstanding visual effects in a photo-real feature.
In a surprise move, the VES awards snubbed two other releases that seem poised for Oscar nods: “Black Panther” and “Mary Poppins Returns.” Neither of those flicks earned a single nomination Tuesday, though both are expected to compete in the more high-profile Oscar categories (including Best Picture and Best Actress, respectively).
The top animated feature contender was “Incredibles 2,” while “Lost in Space” earned the most nominations for a TV series. Winners will be announced at a ceremony on February 5, hosted by Patton Oswalt.
A partial list of nominees is below. For the full slate, check here.
Outstanding Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature Avengers: Infinity War
Christopher Robin
Ready Player One
Solo: A Star Wars Story
Welcome to Marwen
Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature
12 Strong
Bird Box
Bohemian Rhapsody
First Man
Outlaw King
Outstanding Visual Effects in an Animated Feature Dr. Seuss’ The Grinch
Incredibles 2
Isle of Dogs
Ralph Breaks the Internet
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Outstanding Visual Effects in a Photoreal Episode Altered Carbon; Out of the Past
Krypton; The Phantom Zone
Lost in Space; Danger, Will Robinson
The Terror; Go For Broke
Westworld; The Passenger
Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Photoreal Episode Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan; Pilot
The Alienist; The Boy on the Bridge
The Deuce; We’re All Beasts
The First; Near and Far
The Handmaid’s Tale; June
Outstanding Animated Character in a Photoreal Feature Avengers: Infinity War; Thanos Christopher Robin; Tigger Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom; Indoraptor
Ready Player One; Art3mis
Outstanding Animated Character in an Animated Feature Dr. Seuss’ The Grinch; The Grinch
Incredibles 2; Helen Parr
Ralph Breaks the Internet; Ralphzilla
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse; Miles Morales
Outstanding Animated Character in an Episode or Real-Time Project
Cycles; Rae
Lost in Space; Humanoid
Nightflyers; All That We Have Found; Eris
Marvel’s Spider-Man; Doc Ock
At least, that’s what producers of the 91st Academy Awards are hoping happens, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Now that Kevin Hart is definitely not hosting and no replacement has been found, sources tell the site that the Oscars is hoping to reunite some of the industry’s biggest stars from one of the biggest franchises in movie history.
In 2013, the ceremony brought together original “Avengers” stars Robert Downey Jr. (Iron Man), Chris Evans (Captain America), Mark Ruffalo (Bruce Banner/The Hulk), Jeremy Renner (Hawkeye) and Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury).
The Marvel Cinematic Universe has exploded in growth since then. This year’s “Avengers: Infinity War” also featured actors from “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Doctor Strange,” and “Black Panther.” The latter is likely to be among the Best Picture nominees, making those stars’ appearances even more likely.
The Feb. 24 telecast is being produced Donna Gigliotti and co-produced and directed by Glenn Weiss (yeah, the guy who proposed at the Emmys).
And of course, a Marvel-ous Oscars would be a win for Disney, since it owns Marvel and ABC, which is airing the ceremony.
Five years later, Thor’s first sequel still leaves a bad taste in our mouths.
For a company that prides itself on the uniformity of its productions, both visually and thematically, in an effort to create a consistent shared universe, people’s ideas about which Marvel Studios movie is the worst varies wildly.
There are some that feel “Iron Man 3” was too tonally askew from the previous two Iron Man film. Some folks are convinced that “Ant-Man” is too slight for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, especially in the run-up to this summer’s bleak superhero free-for-all “Avengers: Infinity War.” But for our money, there is a clear outlier in the MCU, standing apart not just for terribleness but for its absolute disposability, and its name is “Thor: The Dark World.”
Let’s pause for a moment and talk about the development of “Dark World,” which by all accounts was an absolute nightmare, even by the chaotic standards of Marvel Studios at the time. The studio initially hired Patty Jenkins, who wanted to go with a bold new interpretation, having Thor face off against the Enchantress and making that pocket of the universe lusher and more female. Of course, that didn’t happen, and Jenkins was fired and the female villain was nixed, reportedly because of a suggestion from Ike Perlmutter — the reclusive, far rightwing CEO of Marvel. He suggested that female action figures did not sell as well as others.
Natalie Portman, who aligned herself with Jenkins, was noticeably unhappy and Jenkins went on to direct a little superhero movie called “Wonder Woman.”
Marvel then turned to Alan Taylor, the director of a number of memorable “Game of Thrones” episodes, to oversee the project. Taylor wanted to make things grimier and more authentic. It didn’t exactly turn out that way. During the run-up to his second feature, 2015’s “Terminator Genysis,” he told Uproxx that, “The Marvel experience was particularly wrenching because I was sort of given absolute freedom while we were shooting, and then in post it turned into a different movie. So, that is something I hope never to repeat and don’t wish upon anybody else.” Welp.
What made the first “Thor” so much fun was that it was Marvel’s equivalent of “Splash.” Thor (played wonderfully by Chris Hemsworth) is a spoiled god who gets banished to earth and has to find his true power before returning to his kingdom. As it turned out, watching a god bumble around suburban New Mexico is really very funny. (Even, at times, through Kenneth Branagh’s Dutch angle-d lens. This visual approach gave it a somewhat more campy “oomph.”) This is why, somewhat tellingly, the best parts of “Dark World” involve some kind of comedic interaction or misunderstanding based around the intersection of the magical and the mundane — Thor hanging his legendary hammer up on a coat rack, Darcy (Kat Dennings) asking Thor how space was, etc.
Marvel Studios
But, again, these moments are few and far between and the rest of “Thor: The Dark World” is an absolute slog.
The villains are a band of dark elves (led by Christopher Eccleston, who took over for Mads Mikkelson, who left shortly before production began) only slightly more threatening than the Keebler variety, and the entire movie feels slapdash and slipshod, like it was assembled after the fact from disparate elements that nobody knew where to put. Portman reluctantly returned, but is saddled with the lamest of lame storylines, accidentally stumbling upon the otherworldly MacGuffin (a slithery, red goop called the Aether). Starting a movie with such flagrant coincidence is like building a mansion on quicksand; from there on in, all the movie does is sink.
And things that you might have thought, “Oh there’s no way they could screw that up,” well, they do. Loki’s return, for the first time since the events of “The Avengers,” should have been full of huge moments. But the character is poorly utilized and awkwardly re-introduced. (Tom Hiddleston, for his part, just looks bored.)
And the action sequences, usually the first thing developed for the movie by a team of very smart people, fizzle, too. There’s a sequence towards the end that, thanks to some mystical something-or-another, sees Thor fighting across multiple planets/realms. This inventive climax should have been an unforgettable showstopper. Instead, thanks to some drab visuals and half-finished effects, it falters. Royally. (At least we got that very funny Chris Evans cameo, scripted by Joss Whedon, when Thor has a walk-and-talk with Loki posing as Captain America.)
But maybe the most criminal aspect of “Thor: The Dark World,” beyond its lack of entertainment value and sluggish pacing, is the fact that it doesn’t add anything to the larger MCU. Nothing.
Sure, the Aether, clumsily establishes itself as one of the cosmic Infinity Stones that Thanos comes charging after in “Avengers: Infinity War,” but it was hard to even recognize that as a “stone,” given that most of the time it’s a column of nebulous CG goo. Other than that, the movie is entirely skippable. Almost all of the characters from “The Dark World,” save for Stellan Skarsgard’s kooky scientist, have failed to show up again in the universe — Portman, Dennings, and Eccelston haven’t returned, even in the subsequent “Thor” movie (the brilliant, bonkers “Thor Ragnarok”). Missing this film in the lead up to “Infinity War” meant nothing.
It’s throwaway quality, noticeable upon initial watch, has only grown in magnitude since. This is unquestionably the worst Marvel movie, one that should have been forever banished to the furthest corner of the galaxy.
At this point, even “Avengers” fans are mocking “Avengers” fans for being so obsessed with the “Avengers 4” title.
It’s OK if no one tells us the title. It’s OK if we have to wait. It’s not that deep.
But it’s also OK to be caught up in the hype — it’s better than not caring about anything at all! But you should at least be able to laugh at yourself.
Marvel Studios should be sharing the official title pretty soon. Boss Kevin Feige said it would come out toward the end of the year, after the first “Captain Marvel” tease. So … any day now.
And then what? Superfans will have to decode every inch of the title, then the first trailer. It’s a good thing we have a lot of time to kill until “Captain Marvel” shows up in March, and “Avengers 4” in April/May.
Tom Hardy wants his Eddie Brock/Venom “to run with the established family” — meaning the Marvel Cinematic Universe family. The best way to get into that world is probably through a PG-13 rating, despite many comic book fans wanting an R-rated “Venom.”
“Venom” co-stars Tom Hardy and Riz Ahmed talked to MTV International about Sony’s Marvel Comics film — which is separate from Marvel Studios’ Marvel Comics films with the “Avengers.” During the talk, Hardy tried to defend the PG-13 rating, and also pushed for a future crossover with the “Avengers.”
Ahmed first talked about comic book fans being so hardcore, and asking them questions on the street about “Venom.”
MTV International: “Is there a particular question fans have been asking the most about ‘Venom’?”
Tom Hardy: “‘Is it going to be R-Rated?’ That’s the big question and the answers been answered, isn’t it?”
Riz Ahmed: “It’s a 15 in the UK.”
Tom Hardy: “And it’s a PG-13 in the States. But to be fair, the thing can fulcrum into R-Rated, and fulcrum into youth or children. My littlest ones, they watch Spider-Man and Venom quite comfortably and Venom toys appear and LEGO appear in my nostril in the morning, you know what I mean? So it’s not like they’re scared by him. And at the same time there’s a lot in the real estate that you can actually imbue with a complete sense of gratuitous violence if you really wanted to, and I think you’ve got the right people for that job if you want to push it. Of course that’s where I’d love to go with it. And I’d love to through all the Avengers as well with it. But that’s above my pay grade. Riz, maybe you could have a word.”
Riz Ahmed: “You want me to talk to the Avengers and tell them you want to have a fight with them? That Venom wants to fight the Avengers.”
Hardy put them out there for a crossover, but if it doesn’t happen, he thinks they can fight alone.
Watch the full MTV video for more, including the breaking news that Tom Hardy is not actually obsessed with the angel emoji, because someone else runs his social media for him.
Put on your Science Bro thinking caps and solve this puzzle. It may be a title clue for “Avengers 4.” It also may not. Those are the options!
Directors Anthony Russo and Joe Russo are hard at work on “Avengers 4” — but also opening a new restaurant, see below — and shared a new mystery with fans.
That “End Game” might be a slight stretch, but we love it anyway. End Game for the win. One word or two, though?
Marvel Studios
You may have also noticed that Joe Russo is now co-owner of a restaurant in downtown Los Angeles, and he worked his Rolodex to get several MCU stars in early, before this Thursday’s grand opening:
You want more Loki, including more Tom Hiddleston? You got it. Or you may get it, if Variety‘s report pans out.
Variety is a pretty trusted source, so “Avengers” fans should feel free to get their hopes up fairly high.
According to Variety, Disney’s upcoming streaming service “is in early development on an ambitious plan for a number of limited series centered on popular characters from the Marvel Cinematic Universe. These series will likely include shows centered on Loki and the Scarlet Witch, along with other beloved superheroes who have yet to appear in their own standalone movies.”
Variety added that the original MCU stars — including Tom Hiddleston as Loki, and Elizabeth Olsen as Scarlet Witch — are expected to play the characters in the Disney streaming shows. Each show is expected to have six to eight episodes, the site added, and Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige is expected to have a hands-on role in each show’s development.
Sounds pretty awesome from here.
Marvel Studios
It’s not clear if, say, Loki’s series would be a prequel set before “Avengers: Infinity War” or if fans should REALLY get their hopes up and it’s set after the events of “Infinity War” and maybe also “Avengers 4.”
Insiders emphasized to Variety that “Avengers” characters/stars that have gotten their own movies will not get their own series. This will focus on “characters who have served as second tier characters in the MCU.”
It may also be a sign that these characters will not get their own standalone movies. But what about a character like Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan)? Would he get his own series on the Disney streaming service, or will Marvel Studios give him his own standalone series at some point in one of the next MCU phases?
At any rate, this Disney streamer just keeps sounding better — and yet worse to our wallets. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, HBO, etc. Can we get a streaming tax break? There’s no word yet on when the Marvel series would start production or premiere. The Disney streamer itself doesn’t even have an official launch date, other than 2019. But last we heard, Netflix will stop getting Disney/Marvel family shows starting with “Captain Marvel.”
Clear your schedule from August 30 to September 6. You now have daily dates with the Avengers!
Marvel Studios
Marvel Studios really knows how to party. It has been celebrating its 10th anniversary (it all started with “Iron Man” in 2008) all year.
Here’s the newest fun:
“To celebrate Marvel Studios’ 10th anniversary, IMAX Theatres across the U.S. and Canada will show a decade of Marvel Studios’ films. The Marvel Studios 10th Anniversary Film Festival takes place from 8/30 – 9/6 and will show all twenty films exclusively in IMAX, including “Iron Man,” “The Incredible Hulk” and “Captain America: The First Avenger,” which have never been seen in IMAX.”
Sept. 5: “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2,” “Captain America: Civil War,” “The Avengers,” “Avengers: Infinity War”
Sept. 6: Fans will vote for two screenings.
The final two showings on Thursday, 9/6 will be chosen by the fans. Voting is open August 17. “Be sure to vote on the Twitter poll posted by @IMAX or @MarvelStudios.”
WARNING: This post contains SPOILERS for “Avengers: Infinity War.” Read on at your own risk.
After the grim ending of “Avengers: Infinity War,” Marvel is taking a bit of a left turn for its next big sequel, “Spider-Man: Far From Home.” While audiences have already been reassured that the film is funnier than its predecessor, it’s also apparently going to do some time-traveling.
According to Vulture, longtime MCU favorites Samuel L. Jackson and Cobie Smulders will both appear in “Far From Home.” That’s after their characters, Nick Fury and Maria Hill, were (SPOILER ALERT) wiped out with a snap of Thanos’s fingers at the end of “Infinity War” (along with titular “Spider-Man” star, Tom Holland).
But let’s ignore all that for now. Vulture reports that Sony had no comment on the casting, so we don’t yet know what timeline we’re looking at “Far From Home” to take place in. The recent, pre-“War” past? Sometime in a Thanos-free future?