Tag: andrew-garfield

  • Jessica Chastain, Andrew Garfield talk ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’

    Jessica Chastain, Andrew Garfield talk ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’

    jvDB44JR

    The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ shows the rise and fall of televangelists Jim & Tammy Faye Bakker. Jessica Chastain plays Tammy Faye Bakker and Andrew Garfield plays Jim Bakker in a movie that follows them from the humble beginnings as itinerant preachers to the heights of their multi-million dollar broadcasting empire. The movie also covers their fall from grace as Jim Bakker’s financial malfeasance comes to light. The two actors spoke to Moviefone about playing these two real-life figures.


    First, Jessica Chastain talks about her prosthetics and costume added to her performance.

    Moviefone: I have to ask you about the makeup and prosthetics, especially that opening shot when you’re the final version of Tammy, and we just see that close up of her face, the makeup and prosthetics are insane. I honestly feel like the makeup artists will get an Oscar nomination. What was it like physically becoming Tammy Faye Bakker?

    Jessica Chastain: It was amazing. I mean, there’s all different aspects of it because it’s hard work, and you see, like, I’m just sitting there, they’re doing all the work in terms of creating that, but it’s also like you have to concentrate. You’re sitting in a chair for an average four hours every morning, and it’s like, okay, look this way, now look this way. Can you close your eyes for 10 seconds? Can you do this? Like, you’re participating with them, and you have to be so focused because they are artists, and you want them to be able to have the opportunity to do their best work. But man, like the second I would do the prosthetics makeup, hair, costumes, and by the time I was on set, like I would look at myself in the mirror before I would get to set, and it was just like, I’m her. That whole bridge and listening to her voice in my ears as I was going through all those journeys, it just brought me to her.

    MF: And obviously that’s so valuable to you as an actor, to be able to look in the mirror and see her that in a way it kind of just immediately puts you into the character, and you can really just like, let go and be Tammy Faye.

    Chastain: Yeah. I could just play. I mean, I like felt so cute in my little outfits and my shoulder pads and my nails. And like, I just loved it.

    MF: There were so many moments in this film that were so over the top and funny. I mean, I just spoke to Andrew Garfield about the fact that they were funny people. Did you and Andrew have moments where you’re in the middle of the scene, and you just burst out laughing?

    Chastain: Yes. But if we burst out laughing, it was in character because the environment was open always for exploration. So we would follow the script, but many times we would in improv on top of the lines. So if he did something that made me laugh, I could laugh as Tammy because Tammy would laugh. So we were really, there was like a free flow creative space that [director] Michael Showalter emboldened us to have. So yeah, there was a lot of laughter.

    Andrew Garfield and Jessica Chastain as Jim & Tammy Faye Bakker in 'The Eyes of Tammy Faye'
    Andrew Garfield and Jessica Chastain as Jim & Tammy Faye Bakker in ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’

    MF: Obviously, you want to do Tammy Faye justice. And I assume that actors sometimes have a little bit of pressure when portraying a real person. What kind of research did you do? What resources did you have?

    Chastain: Well, I knew about a decade before we made the film that I was going to do it. So any book I could find, I read, any video of her, I absolutely watched, people that knew her, I talked to. I did as much as I could to feel like I knew her. I never had the opportunity to meet her, and I became like obsessed with knowing her through research. And I have to tell you, it was one of the most enjoyable research jobs I’ve ever done for that because she was so sweet. And the people, like we were filming in Charlotte, North Carolina, where they actually lived and worked, and you go into a store and someone’s like, oh yeah, I met Tammy, she would come in here, I used to wait on her table, and she was the nicest person. Everyone had the best things to say about Tammy Bakker, Tammy Faye. And it was a joy, really.


    Andrew Garfield shares his own prosthetic experiences, and talks about the wealth of material available for research about Jim Bakker.

    I would love to talk to you about the makeup and prosthetics, because obviously both you and Jessica Chastain in this film in order to make yourself look more like the real people, you look entirely different almost. What was it like becoming Jim Bakker, physically?

    Andrew Garfield: Annoying! It was fun. That was a part of it, and there was a lot of amazing work that went into it, especially the makeup prosthetics people that are just true artists. And the two people that made me up every day, we’ll text each other because we got very intimate. It was like five hours at the beginning of every day together, just sat with each other, them just prodding at my face. And thank God they were decent guys that were just fun and funny and stupid humor. Thank God we made each other laugh, otherwise I think it would have been a very, very different gig. So, yeah. And my friend Bryson did the wigs last minute beautifully, and it was a whole village of work. So yeah, it was definitely hard work, but also I think kind of a fun experiment to attempt to create that look together.

    MF: Funny that you called it annoying. But speaking of laughing while doing this film, I felt like there were a lot of scenes in this film that were so over the top, it was kind of funny. Did you find yourself and Jessica kind of breaking the scene because you just burst out laughing in the middle of it?

    Garfield: No, I think what was cool about Jim and Tammy is that they were stranger than fiction. They were just funny people. They were just naturally kind of absurd and funny, and they leaned into it, and they played up to it. They were performers. They were clowns in a lot of ways, in a great way. I don’t mean that in any… I love clowns. Clowning is the hardest thing to do, like someone getting on stage and doing stand-up or someone even more difficult like a clown at Cirque du Soleil. It’s a really vulnerable place to be, and they were willing participants in their attempt to make Christianity fun and joyful and playful. So I actually really admire that aspect of them. And yeah, me and Jessica had a lot of fun playing those scenes together, for sure.

    MF: I always assume that when actors are playing a real person, that there’s sort of this pressure to do the character and the person justice. So in preparing for Jim Bakker, what kind of research and what kind of resources did you have?

    Garfield: Yeah, thankfully there’s a lot of information out there. There’s lots of people I could speak to who knew him, who worked with him, family members. I never got to speak to him, unfortunately, but I’m still open to that, of course. I would love to sit down with him and just listen and have an off the record, private conversation with him. It would just be wonderful. But there’s lots of books. He wrote his own autobiography about jail, about prison and about how he got things wrong. And then there’s obviously endless footage of the 700 Club, and Jim and Tammy show, and Heritage USA and PTL. So there wasn’t enough hours in the day to watch and read all of it, so you just do all you can, and you steep yourself in the material, and you hope that it starts to affect your cells, and you try and do justice to the person that you’re portraying.

    ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ is now in theaters.

    tXdBWA6OE60584dioSRRg5
  • Female Filmmakers in Focus: Gia Coppola on her new film ‘Mainstream’

    Female Filmmakers in Focus: Gia Coppola on her new film ‘Mainstream’

    Welcome to Female Filmmakers in Focus, where you will find a recommendation for films directed by women to seek out each week. This week features an interview with Gia Coppola about her new satire ‘Mainstream,’ plus a look back at ‘Zola’ director Janicza Bravo’s debut feature film ‘Lemon.’

    Mainstream (directed by Gia Coppola)

    Gia Coppola on the set of 'Mainstream'  (Photo courtesy IFC Films)
    Gia Coppola on the set of ‘Mainstream’ (Photo courtesy IFC Films)

    Granddaughter of Francis Ford Coppola and niece of Sofia Coppola, filmmaking is in Gia Coppola’s blood. She sharpened her cinematic skills making short films for fashion designers like Zac Posen, Diane Von Furstenberg, and Rodarte. She made her feature film debut adapting James Franco’s short story collection ‘Palo Alto.’ That film, starring Emma Roberts and Jack Kilmer, premiered at the 2013 Toronto Film Festival and was released in theaters in the spring of 2014. She continues to work in fashion photography, and has directed music videos in between feature film projects.

    Her latest film ‘Mainstream’ is a social media satire starring Andrew Garfield as a mysterious street performer-turned influencer and Maya Hawke as the creator of his wildly popular YouTube show. The film also features cameos from real-life influencers like Patrick Starr and Jake Paul. Fans of Francis Ford Coppola’s films will also get a hoot out of long-time collaborator Colleen Camp as the skeevy owner of a magic-themed bar. Shot in and around Hollywood Boulevard, Coppola aims to skewer the Hollywood machine, expose the tarnish under the veneer of social media stars, and asks us to question what our current culture deems valuable.
    C6DxapEdrF0IIbAMWcKem3


    Moviefone spoke to Gia Coppola about her new film.

    Moviefone: What inspired you to tackle the YouTube show culture?
    Gia Coppola: I think for me, the internet is always evolving, so how do you make a movie about something that is rapidly changing? I felt like it’s more about the emotion of the story, it could be about any platform. It doesn’t really matter. Emotional scenarios have been part of our lives since cavemen, but it’s now extra amplified because it’s part of our everyday lives with the phone, and how do you find sanity and ground yourself in that environment?

    MF: How did you choose the Hollywood locations?
    GC: I have a special affection for Hollywood Boulevard. I was raised right above it. I still live right above it. I love to walk through it. It feels like such a metaphor for Hollywood and these sorts of dreams, and all these amazing characters, and our obsession with fame and why we find so much value in that. My uncle’s office is right on the boulevard, so I walk there from home. It’s sort of my hood, the strip there. The bar was a made up place, but I was inspired by The Magic Castle and the kooky bars that are on the strip.

    MF: Can you talk a bit about inspiration for Andrew Garfield’s gonzo Hollywood Boulevard street performer?
    GC: His character is exactly like these sorts of characters you see walking along Hollywood Boulevard. I’m so fascinated by them. What’s their story? Where did they come from? Why do they do what they’re doing?


    MF: ‘Network’ seems like a big influence. Were there any other inspirations for the structure of the film?

    GC: ‘Network’ was definitely a big inspiration for me. I had never seen it. I had seen ‘A Face In The Crowd,’ and I was blown away. When I got into this tone of satire and this commentary on the absurdity of our culture it led me down the path to ‘Network,’ which I think is a perfect movie. I could only kiss the toe of something that was made like that. I also like ‘Broadcast News.’

    MF: I love the parallels between Andrew Garfield’s character in this and Andy Griffith in ‘A Face In The Crowd’. Do you think that society has changed in the 70+ years since that film premiered?
    CG: I think as a collective we love to see a train wreck and the wheels to come off, and that’s when we actually pay attention and focus sometimes. I was playing with that idea. Do we embolden when that happens? Is it every man for himself or are we all in this together? I also wanted to play with the idea that what he is saying, there’s truth to it, but it’s also messy and conflicted and inappropriate. In the end, is what he says truthful to him or is it another attempt to get attention and likes?

    MF: Did you always have Maya Hawke in mind for Frankie?
    GC: She’s super special. I met her through a job. I was doing a photoshoot, and she was the subject. We had to spend two days together, and it was kind of an instant connection. We just got each other’s weirdness. We didn’t have to communicate with language; it felt kind of telepathic in a way. I knew when I saw her that the character had come alive, and then I couldn’t imagine anyone else but her. She did exactly that for me.

    MF: How did you get real influencers to participate in the film?
    GC: It was really fun to get to meet all these influencers and learn from them, about their experiences and their connection with their own fan base. They’re very sweet and intelligent and talented people. With that round table, it was figuring out different types of YouTubers or social influencers who have very different content.

    MF: Can you talk about the way you shot the film?.
    GC: [Cinematographer] Autumn Durald is one of my best friends, and she shot ‘Palo Alto,’ and I just trust her wholeheartedly. I try to focus on the narrative. Every once in a while I’ll have some input because I love photography, but I just trust her wholeheartedly to do what she wants to do and what she feels is right. We talked a little bit about how I wanted to incorporate this aesthetic of raw, candid, kind of janky ugliness in contrast to the more cinematic, beautiful, traditional way of telling a story.

    MF: The use of emojis was really interesting.
    GC: I always knew I wanted to add graphics and I felt like the way I’d seen it represented in most films didn’t feel the way I wanted to see it or that I felt like I related to it. I wanted to find a way to express emotionally what’s going on in a scene and embellish it in that way. It always stemmed from me feeling there was an overabundance of content, just in our life, and how do you escape it? Just that feeling of being inundated and bloated. I wanted to kind of emoji-vomit it out.

    MF: Can you recommend another film directed by a woman for our readers to seek out?
    GC: I’m really excited to see ‘Zola’, but I haven’t seen it yet. I know that team of people are really intelligent and have great taste and that story is super interesting. So I’m excited for that.

    MF: Have you seen Janicza Bravo’s previous film ‘Lemon’?
    GC: I have not, but I’ve gotten to know her a little bit through the process of having films come out during the pandemic. I admire her a lot, and I’m excited to see more of her work. I think her social media is hilarious.

    Lemon (directed by Janicza Bravo)

    Janicza Bravo (left) on the set of Lemon. (Photo courtesy Magnolia Pictures)
    Janicza Bravo (left) on the set of Lemon. (Photo courtesy Magnolia Pictures)

    Born in 1981 in New York City, Janicza Bravo spent much of her childhood living between the United States and Panama. She studied costume and set design for theater, as well as acting at NYU. She worked as a stylist before turning to filmmaking. She honed her unique cinematic voice directing seven short films, including the Sundance stand-out ‘Gregory Go Boom’ starring Michael Cera. She broke into the mainstream with the searing “Juneteenth” episode of Donald Glover’s hit television show ‘Atlanta’ in 2016. In 2017, she directed her first feature film ‘Lemon,’ starring her then-husband Brett Gelman. Premiering at the SXSW film festival, ‘Lemon’ follows a miserable middle-aged man named Isaac (Gelman) who is just never quite able to do the right thing. Although the film received mixed reviews after its release, Bravo’s distinctly absurd cringe humor was praised. Her next feature film is ‘Zola,’ is based on the viral Twitter thread. The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in 2020 and will be released this June.

    ClRGQY4gIAF8tJiUwbHLZ5
  • Jessica Chastain, Andrew Garfield to Star in Biopic ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’

    Jessica Chastain, Andrew Garfield to Star in Biopic ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’

    Jessica Chastain; Andrew Garfield
    STX Films; A24

    The upcoming Fox Searchlight biopic “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” has landed Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield as its stars.

    The two actors will play the real-life televangelists who the story centers on, Tammy Faye and Jim Bakker, Variety reports. The film is based on Fenton Bailey and Randy Barbato‘s 2000 documentary of the same name, which looked at the pair’s rise and fall. Abe Sylvia has written the script, and Michael Showalter (“The Big Sick”) will direct.

    The Bakkers became popular in the ’70s and ’80s, to the point that they hosted multiple TV shows, founded a TV network, and even built an theme park. They later became embroiled in scandal, though, and neither their empire nor their marriage survived. The upcoming film is one of many takes on their story, following the likes of the aforementioned documentary, multiple musicals, a play, and more.

    Both Chastain and Garfield are well-known actors with past Academy Award nominations to their respective names. Chastain, a two-time nominee, has recently starred in “Molly’s Game” and “Woman Walks Ahead.” Meanwhile, Garfield’s recent films include “Under the Silver Lake” and “Breathe.”

    Chastain is set to produce “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” alongside her Freckle Films colleague Kelly Carmichael and MWM Studios’ Gigi Pritzker and Rachel Shane. Jordana Mollick will executive produce.

    [via: Variety]

    This article has been updated.

  • Andrew Garfield to Play Pianist James Rhodes in Biopic ‘Instrumental’

    Andrew Garfield to Play Pianist James Rhodes in Biopic ‘Instrumental’

    Andrew Garfield in Breathe
    Bleecker Street

    Next up for Andrew Garfield is another biopic. The actor is set to star in the drama “Instrumental,” Deadline reports. It’s based on James Rhodes’s memoir of the same name and tells the story of how music helped the acclaimed concert pianist cope with abuse, trauma, and addiction.

    Garfield will play Rhodes, and the pianist seems thrilled about it. After the news broke, Rhodes tweeted about it, writing, “Well this is some exciting news to share… What an awesome team!” He also added that he hopes the adaptation will “do a lot for classical music.”

    Garfield previously played British advocate Robin Cavandish in the biopic “Breathe.” More recently, he starred in the neo-noir mystery film “Under the Silver Lake.” The actor is also well-known for roles in “Hacksaw Ridge” and “The Social Network,” among others.

    “Instrumental” has an Academy Award-winning director on board, as James Marsh (“The Theory of Everything”) is helming. Production is scheduled to begin in the U.K. before the end of the year. Monumental Pictures’ Debra Hayward and Alison Owens are set to produce.

    [via: Deadline]

  • ‘Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse’ Almost Had a Scene With Three Live-Action Spideys

    ‘Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse’ Almost Had a Scene With Three Live-Action Spideys

    Sony Pictures

    There’s a whole lot of Spideys in “Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse. (Which just scored an Oscar nomination. Congarts!)  But we might have had even more Spideys in the mix: past webslingers Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield and current MCU Spider-Man Tom Holland.

    On The Q&A with Jeff Goldsmith podcast, ‘Spider-Verse’ co-writer/co-director Rodney Rothman revealed that he wrote a scene that featured all three live-action stars. But they ultimately decided it would be too “confusing” and left it out. (No word on whether the three actors were up for the gig.)

    “I wrote a scene that had Tom Holland and Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire in the same scene and… I don’t want to get into it but I did write that scene, but there’s a lot of anxiety, there’s a lot of anxiety around the movie generally and there was anxiety about confusing people.”

    “There were many thoughts about where we could put Tobey Maguire and others,” Rothman said previously. “I think after this film, those thoughts might have a little more traction. But before this movie, and introducing the idea of the ‘Spider-Verse’ to the audience, I think everybody was afraid that it would just really confuse people. But wow, it would have been fun.”

    Can there ever be too many Spideys? Maybe in the next film. That is, if Sony and Disney/Marvel can work together.

    [Via Slashfilm]

  • ‘Under the Silver Lake’ From ‘It Follows’ Director Won’t Open Until December

    Under the Silver Lake,” the new film from “It Follows” director David Robert Mitchell, was set to be released on June 22. But after a not-great response at the Cannes Film Festival, distributor A24 has opted to release the film in December instead.

    The neonoir, which stars Andrew Garfield and Riley Keough, will now be released on December 7. That might also mean they don’t want it to get lost in the summer shuffle and consider it more prestigious Oscar season fare.

    Here’s the official synopsis:

    Sam (Andrew Garfield) is a disenchanted 33-year-old who discovers a mysterious woman, Sarah (Riley Keough), frolicking in his apartment’s swimming pool. When she vanishes, Sam embarks on a surreal quest across Los Angeles to decode the secret behind her disappearance, leading him into the murkiest depths of mystery, scandal, and conspiracy in the City of Angels.

    And a sampling of the reviews from Cannes:

    THR: “A knotty neo-noir [that] slides into a Lynchian swamp of outré weirdness.”

    Village Voice: “The film itself lacks atmosphere, or tension, or emotional engagement.”

    Seventh Row: “The film’s brazen sexism is matched by the shameless unoriginality of the conspiracy theories and clues that take up most of its runtime.”

    Film School Rejects: “Andrew Garfield shines in ‘It Follows’ writer-director David Robert Mitchell’s much-anticipated and very funny modern noir.”

    Film Inquiry: “It’s a lot to process. I think it may be a modern masterpiece?”

    [Via THR]

  • Emma Stone Reportedly Has a New Boyfriend, and It’s Not Andrew Garfield

    'Killing Of A Sacred Deer' UK Premiere - 61st BFI London Film FestivalScarlett Johansson, Ben Affleck, and now Emma Stone. There must be something in the water at “SNL.”

    Despite “Saturday Night Live” segment director Dave McCary.

    People got intel from its own unnamed source, who told them Stone, 28, and McCary, 32, have been dating for at least three months. They met at the end of 2016 when Stone hosted SNL in December; she appeared in the sketch “Wells for Boys,” which he directed. Stone also appeared as a surprise guest on the recent SNL season premiere hosted by her “La La Land” costar Ryan Gosling.

    McCary also directed the movie “Brigsby Bear,” starring SNL’s Kyle Mooney, and McCary and Stone were seen together at the movie’s premiere in June.

    Rooftop Films Presents A Sneak Preview Of Sony Pictures Classics' BRIGSBY BEARPeople’s source said McCary and Stone have been trying to “keep their romance on the down low.” Apparently that didn’t work.

    SNL has been on romance roll this year. Scarlett Johansson has been dating (although maybe not exclusively) “Weekend Update” coanchor Colin Jost. Ben Affleck is currently dating SNL show producer Lindsay Shookus.

    But who is Andrew Garfield dating? Is he alone? Is he waiting for Emma Stone to come back? Or are we the only ones who refuse to move on?

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone May Be Dating Again, and Fans Are Freaking Out

    "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" - World Premiere - Red Carpet ArrivalsGive love another round of CPR ’cause it might not be dead after all!

    The Internet is latching onto rumors that “The Amazing Spider-Man” couple Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone may have rekindled their romance after a two-year break. The exclusive is out of the U.K. tabloid The Sun, so that should probably give us pause, but fans are determined to find some silver lining in the universe, so if it has to come from anonymous sources, so be it!

    Here’s part of The Sun‘s report:

    “Things are heating up again for the pair with US actress Emma making multiple trips to see him in his London production Angels In America.

    A source close to the actor said: “Andrew’s feelings for Emma never softened and now they are growing close once again.

    She has seen the show several times and always goes backstage afterwards to see him.

    “They have even been sneaking out of the back door holding hands.”

    The source added that Stone spent some time in the U.K. earlier this year to shoot her film “The Favourite,” but made another trip to London when she reconnected with Garfield.

    “There is a lot of history between them but they are both so busy. At the moment they are just seeing what happens.”

    Well, what’s happening is Twitter is ecstatic at the idea of this beloved couple getting back together, especially after the heartbreak of Anna Faris and Chris Pratt separating:

    We don’t want to get too excited, but — concerning The Sun report — the reliable LaineyGossip said, “For those of you who are still shipping these two, it’s worth noting that Dan Wootton is the reporter who broke the story that Taylor Swift and Joe Alwyn are dating so he has a solid track record.”

    This is not a bad time to be Emma Stone in general. Not only is she maybe back together with the lovable Andrew Garfield, she’s the reigning Best Actress Oscar winner, and “La La Land” is reportedly what pushed her over the edge to beat Jennifer Lawrence as the highest-paid actress in the world. (All she does is win, win, win, no matter what…)

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Andrew Garfield Criticized for Quip That He’s a Gay Man ‘Without the Physical Act’

    89th Annual Academy Awards - ArrivalsAndrew Garfield is currently starring in a London production of “Angels in America,” and he was asked about his research for his role as a gay man with AIDS. His answer got a strong reaction — and probably not the kind that he wanted.

    During a panel discussion, an audience member said they read an interview in Gay Times magazine saying Garfield had been locked into this process for a year. They asked what sort of resources the actor had in terms of research, or did it all come from “Angels in America” rehearsals.

    Gay Times was at the panel and relayed Garfield’s response:

    “As far as I know, I am not a gay man. Maybe I’ll have an awakening later in my life, which I’m sure will be wonderful and I’ll get to explore that part of the garden, but right now I’m secluded to my area, which is wonderful as well. I adore it, but a big concern was what right do I have to play this wonderful gay role? I had to trust that it was the right thing and Tony [Kushner, writer of ‘Angels in America’] had asked me and maybe if he’d asked me, it was the right thing. It was as about doing honor, doing justice and knowing my herstory. The preparation had begun before (rehearsals began) with a lot of my friends. (The play is) As much devoted to my friends in the gay community as it is those that passed during the epidemic.”

    Later in the talk, “RuPaul’s Drag Race” and that also helped him find his character.

    “My only time off during rehearsals – every Sunday I would have eight friends over and we would just watch Ru. This is my life outside of this play. I am a gay man right now just without the physical act – that’s all.”

    Because of those flippant comments, Garfield has fielded some backlash from fans.

    Others are defending Garfield:

    He didn’t exactly say he’s gay because he watched RuPaul (is he bi for his Ryan Reynolds and Stephen Colbert kisses?), but what he said was definitely ripe for misunderstanding. He was being lighthearted, but humor does not always translate well — especially on a serious, sensitive topic — and to many he came off as insensitive and ignorant. Still, even the most well-intentioned of us have had foot-in-mouth disease, albeit on a less public scale, and maybe he’ll take that fan up on their apology letter offer.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Kirsten Dunst Dismisses New ‘Spider-Man’ Movies: ‘They’re Just Milking That Cow for Money’

    US actors Tobey Maguire (R) and KirstenThis Mary Jane has no time for any Peter Parker but Tobey Maguire.

    Kirsten Dunst co-starred in director Sam Raimi’s three “Spider-Man” movies from 2002-2007, and she’s still casually shading the reboots — not only Tom Holland in the upcoming “Spider-Man: Homecoming,” but also “The Amazing Spider-Man” movies with Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone.

    Basically, everyone else can sit down.

    'The Amazing Spider-Man' Madrid PremiereDunst’s most recent comments are in the new issue of Marie Claire, as part of the promotion for her new movie “The Beguiled.” Here’s that part of the interview:

    When asked for her opinion on the Spider-Man reboot, she was also pretty unequivocal. ‘We made the best ones, so who cares? I’m like, “You make it all you want.” They’re just milking that cow for money. It’s so obvious. You know what I mean?’

    Some fans are taking those comments very seriously, especially as a direct attack on the MCU’s reboot with Tom Holland, but she’s just being loyal to her own team — and probably with a laugh, since she’s not confusing any of this with brain surgery.

    Dunst shared similar mild insults when talking to Variety about how her career took off when she was cast as Mary Jane in Raimi’s “Spider-Man.”

    “I wanted to be in that movie so badly. I loved it, and I wish we could have made a fourth.”

    Here’s what she had to say about the new films:

    She’s ambivalent about Sony’s decision to keep rebooting the franchise, now in its third iteration. “I don’t care,” she says of the reboots, admitting she didn’t see the last installment. “Everyone likes our ‘Spider-Man.’ C’mon, am I right or what? Listen, I’d rather be in the first ones than the new ones.”

    So, like many commenters on the Internet, she says she doesn’t care, but does care just enough to throw some shade. It’s a good thing this Mary Jane isn’t at Peter Parker’s high school in “Homecoming,” ’cause she’d probably scare him more than Vulture.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.