Tag: terry-gilliam

  • Taika Waititi Will Write and Direct Pilot for ‘Time Bandits’ Series

    Taika Waititi Will Write and Direct Pilot for ‘Time Bandits’ Series

    Marvel

    Thor: Ragnarok” director Taika Waititi has just agreed to co-write and direct the pilot for the upcoming “Time Bandits” TV series for Apple.

    It’s based on the 1981 Terry Gilliam cult film about an 11-year-old named Kevin who travels through time with six dwarfs meeting people like Robin Hood and Napoleon Bonaparte. It featured appearances by his fellow “Monty Python” alums John Cleese and Michael Palin.

    Waititi, who directed one of the funniest Marvel movies to date, seems like a perfect match for Gilliam’s dark sense of humor. He and Gilliam will both be executive producers, along with Dan Halsted of TBS’s “People Of Earth.”

    Waititi was rumored to take over for James Gunn as director of “Guardians of the Galaxy,” but that’s not happening. He is, however, going to direct the upcoming “Star Wars” series “The Mandalorian” for Disney+.

    And he’s also busy with the TV version of  his riotous vampire comedy “What We Do In the Shadows,” which he co-wrote and co-directed with “Flight of the Conchords” partner Jemaine Clement. That debuts March 27 on FX. (Set your DVRs.)

    [Via Deadline]

  • Cult Movie ‘Time Bandits’ Is Becoming a TV Series

    Cult Movie ‘Time Bandits’ Is Becoming a TV Series

    Embassy Films

    We might never get to see Terry Gilliam‘s “The Man Who Killed Don Quixote” movie, but a TV series based on his 1980 film “Time Bandits” is a go.

    Apple just acquired the rights to turn the cult comedy into a TV series, with Anonymous Content, Paramount Television, and Media Rights Capital producing.  Gilliam will be a non-writing executive producer.

    In the film, a boy named Kevin joins seven dwarves who’ve stolen a map that charts holes in the space-time fabric. This allows them to jump through time and plunder legendary treasures, which meant the movie hopped from the time of Napoleon to the Titanic.

    The film featured several Monty Python members, including John Cleese as Robin Hood. It also starred Sean Connery as kindly King Agamemnon, Ian Holm as Napoleon, and David Warner as Evil.

    It was produced by Handmade Films, the company founded by ex-Beatle George Harrison. (Who also gave us another favorite British cult comedy, “Withnail and I.”)

    We imagine the series will feature the bandits jumping from one historical adventure to the next. Famous (or not so famous) guest stars TBD.

    [Via Deadline]

  • 14 Things You Didn’t Know About ‘The Fisher King’

    25 years ago, Terry Gilliam’s wildly visual “The Fisher King” premiered on September 27, 1991.

    The fantastical, New York-set film stars Jeff Bridges as a Howard Stern-like shock jock who inadvertently inspires a listener to go on a shooting spree. Robin Williams steals the movie, though, as a man who lost his wife in the shooting tragedy — now reduced to a raving homeless man obsessed with finding the Holy Grail. Mercedes Ruehl won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for her role as a kooky video store owner and Williams was nominated for Best Actor.

    In honor of this exceptional film hitting the quarter century mark, here are some things you probably didn’t know about the film.
    1. It was the first film by Gilliam (left), who co-directed “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” that didn’t feature any of his fellow Monty Python members.

    2. James Cameron was reportedly considered to direct, but instead did “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.” Years later, Gilliam would blast Cameron, saying that mega-million movies like “Avatar” make it harder for smaller filmmakers to succeed.
    3. As Gilliam said in a 2011 American Masters interview, he was inspired to cast Jeff Bridges after seeing him in “The Fabulous Baker Boys,” but Bridges spent most of his meeting with the director trying to get Gilliam to cast someone besides him. He even brought a list of his friends who should do the part instead.

    4. When Bridges showed Gilliam a book of photographs by Joel-Peter Witkin with “missing limbs and heads that have been chopped open,” he was convinced Bridges had the necessary darkness for the role. “It’s the most disturbing, horrifying, beautiful, magical photographs I’d ever seen.” the director recalled on American Masters. “Here’s this sweet all-American lad in the depths of all this. I thought, ‘Wow. You impress me.’”
    5. Gilliam told American Masters in 2011 that he and Williams were the “hot air that flies off into the stratosphere” and that Bridges was “the guy who anchored the movie.” Added Williams, “Even playing an out-there drunk, he’s still the voice of sanity. Especially with me being the voice of insanity.”

    6. Robin Williams helped turn things around on a particularly tough evening. Recalled writer Richard LaGravenese: “I remember one night in particular, filming the Chinese restaurant scene. It was about five in the morning, and we’d been there since seven the night before. Everyone’s energy was drained. Suddenly, Robin did twenty minutes of nonstop impersonations and comedy. I remember one of the grips turning to me with tears in his eyes, he was laughing so hard. Everyone was rejuvenated and juiced. Then Terry turned to me and said: ‘Thank God for him.’” (Gilliam would share his own, slightly-different account of this to The Hollywood Reporter.)
    7. Producer Lynda Obst recalled another night when Williams came to the rescue: “We were shooting the scene where he waltzes in Grand Central Station through all the extras. Commuters would be arriving at 5 a.m. We were so late, we couldn’t break for the extras to have water. The AD was so freaked out, he threw down his walkie talkie and quit. So as Robin’s waltzing in this heavy costume, he’s grabbing water on the sidelines and handing to all the extras when they were hot, tired, crowded, and ready to faint. We could never have wrapped that scene — which might be the best one in the movie — without his spirit.”

    8. One of the men who attacks Jeff Bridges at the beginning of the film is played by Dan Futterman, who went on to play Robin Williams’ son in “The Birdcage.”
    9. In college, Mercedes Ruehl wrote a thesis about T.S. Eliot’s poem “The Wasteland”, which features the Fisher King, so she had had a good feeling when she saw the script for the “The Fisher King.”

    10. The night of the Oscars, Ruehl was trapped in traffic and nearly missed her own category, as she told Hoda Kotb and Kathie Lee in 2009. Since the show is live, she couldn’t be seated until they went to commercial break. “Luckily,” she said, “Jack Palance started doing those pushups and it gave me a few minutes to get my equipoise back.”

    11. Ruehl also revealed that she nearly fell when going up the stairs to accept her Best Supporting Actress Oscar, but someone from the audience came to her aid — Warren Beatty!
    12. You might have missed singer Tom Waits (above) as the beggar in the wheelchair at the train station.

    13. Howard Stern reportedly asked to be a consultant on the film since they were basing Bridges’s character on him. But since the studio wouldn’t pay him, he refused to share tapes from his show with the production.
    14. The day after Williams’s death, Jeff Bridges was doing a press conference in New York for his film “The Giver.” He opened by paying tribute to his late friend:

    “I remember pulling up to the boathouse where we had our party and I look out I say, “Is that Robin? Is that his ghost? No, it’s Radioman.” [Radioman, a homeless movie fan, has appeared in dozens of films in New York.] “It brought back all of these wonderful feelings of what an amazing time we had shooting ‘The Fisher King.’ Bridges said that, when he hugged Radioman, “I felt Robin’s spirit, as I’m feeling him now in this room with us.”
    %Slideshow-428131%

  • Terry Gilliam Apologizes for Being Dead After Variety Mistakenly Posts Obit

    It was just a flesh wound!

    Variety’s report of Terry Gilliam’s death was greatly exaggerated, but the 74-year-old Monty Python OG and iconic director is still sorry to have passed away, especially when he has some gigs lined up. It wasn’t very considerate of him to die, and he insisted fans shouldn’t believe Variety’s subsequent retraction.

    The hilarious awkwardness ensued after Variety — usually very reliable — tweeted news of the “12 Monkeys” and “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” director’s death:


    The article was later pulled and Variety issued a correction/apology/retraction:


    Cue a thousand Monty Python references — from the knight in “Holy Grail” and the dead parrot sketch, to calls of “Bring out your dead!” and the sacking of Variety employees who have just been sacked. Gilliam got in on the fun himself, proving that he’s not dead with an apology for his own demise:

    I APOLOGIZE FOR BEING DEAD especially to those who have already bought tickets to the upcoming talks, but, Variety has…

    Posted by Terry Gilliam on Wednesday, September 9, 2015

    Brilliant! But on a more serious note, we’re glad Gilliam is still alive, ’cause death is usually pretty permanent and we’d miss his unmatched talent and humor. However, since we’re all still among the living, now might be a good time to rewatch Monty Python’s “The Meaning of Life” so we know what the point was when it’s really over.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

    %Slideshow-267612%

  • ‘Jupiter Ascending’ Review

    This happens when a film is discussed openly without anyone having firsthand knowledge of (or even having seen) it, and it becomes something of a self-fulfilling prophecy when said movie come out and underperforms, thanks in large part to countless write-ups lacking reliable sources and built on foundations of hearsay and conjecture.

    Most of the time, these movies are rediscovered years later because, as it turns out, they weren’t that bad after all. Right now, swarms of ill will seem to be circling “Jupiter Ascending,” which opens Friday, due largely to a shift in its release date, from a coveted summer-of-2014 slot to a desolate winter 2015 position. Now that it’s finally here, though, reviewers are sharpening their knives in anticipation. I am here to say that those knives are not necessary; “Jupiter Ascending” is actually a delightful space epic, full of devilishly clever action set pieces, rococo production design, some surprisingly touching moments, and niftily over-the-top performances.

    10118984

    One of the most marvelous things about “Jupiter Ascending” is just how bizarre it is. The movie details the adventures of young Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis), an illegal alien living in Chicago who makes a living scrubbing people’s toilets. Elsewhere, in some far-flung corner of the universe, a royal dynasty is squabbling over who owns Earth, a planet rich in an essential ingredient utilized for outer space commerce. Soon it’s discovered that Jupiter is a “recurrent,” a genetic double for a once vaulted high queen (and rightful owner of the planet).

    Soon, everybody is after her, including a half-wolf bounty hunter named Caine Wise (Channing Tatum), a space police force, this crazy dinosaur guy, and all those squabbling royals (led by Eddie Redmayne). This is fairly standard science-fiction stuff, but the way that the Wachowskis (“The Matrix,” “Bound,” “Cloud Atlas”) pull it off is absolutely, 100% theirs.

    When Jupiter initially encounters some outer-space visitors, she is in a women’s health clinic having her eggs harvested so she can buy a telescope that reminds her of her murdered father (yes, there is a lengthy flashback to Soviet Russia, why wouldn’t there be?), there is a whole section of the movie devoted to Jupiter obtaining her queenly status through bureaucratic paperwork (complete with a cameo from “Brazil” director Terry Gilliam), and, oh yeah, did you read that part about the crazy dinosaur guy?

    At its best, “Jupiter Ascending” is wonderfully, breathlessly alive. There are moments of genuine, awe-inspiring beauty and it’s full of the beautiful world-building that made “The Matrix” films so transformative. The Wachowskis are incredibly earnest filmmakers, sometimes to a fault, and they believe in what they’re doing so completely.

    It’s infectious and so completely at odds with the cold cynicism of most Hollywood productions and adds to the buoyantly fun, Saturday-afternoon serial feeling of the film, reminiscent of everything from “Flash Gordon” to “Star Wars.” You can tell that they’ve lovingly pored over every frame.

    That’s not to say that the movie is perfect; there’s way too much jargon and exposition, delivered in a way that is much harsher than anything in “The Matrix” films. Sometimes certain visual aspects look so similar that it’s hard to tell them apart (spaceships, dinosaur men). And, occasionally, the film can get lost in the specifics of its loopy screenplay. But these are minor faults and didn’t, for an instant, take me away from having a blast.

    For all of the screenplay’s detail and complexity, the movie’s best, most profound moments are also its simplest. There’s a moment when, back on Earth, Jupiter is surrounded by a swarm of bees that respond to her in an elegant way, like Jupiter is conducting a symphony.

    Another moment juxtaposes a lavishly over-the-top wedding (with Kunis wearing one of the all-time most amazing cinematic wedding dresses) with an outer-space firefight. And then there’s the Chicago chase, involving several spaceships and large sections of Chicago getting blown to smithereens. That chase feels new and revolutionary, like the first time you saw the “bullet time” effect in “The Matrix,” and the wizards responsible for it (Double Negative) should be paid a huge compliment for their tireless, hard work. When the studio announced that the scheduling shift was due to the complex nature of the visual effects, you can understand why.

    And this, of course, makes the fact that the critical community is already starting to pile on top of the film even more depressing. Recently, Lana Wachowski, one half of the directing duo, stated that when something is weird or different or off-center on television, it’s celebrated for breaking from the proven formula.

    But when that is attempted in movies, it’s condemned. And that’s true, especially for the Wachowskis, who continually try to reinvent and top themselves, while working in a kind of social consciousness and thematic resonance, sometimes to disastrous financial results. And it’s a shame to think of a movie so full of stunning images and crazy ideas and barbed wit suffering because it’s hard to pin down on a tonal level, or because critics and journalists have somehow poisoned the well due to a smattering of half-whispered intelligence.

    “Jupiter Ascending” doesn’t deserve to be dismissed; it’s a genuine thrill, full of all sorts of things that you’ve never seen before and made by two uncompromisingly brilliant filmmakers who continue to push the boundaries of mainstream movies. Expand your universe, indeed.

    “Jupiter Ascending” is in theaters Friday, February 6.