Tag: star-trek

  • Every J.J. Abrams Movie, Ranked

    Every J.J. Abrams Movie, Ranked

    Lucasfilm/Paramount

    JJ Abrams has designed his career trajectory to have the maximum impact on popular culture. After starting out on television (and with a smattering of big screen writing work), he became one of the most powerful and influential producers, comfortably reshaping our conception of the narrative television drama (with shows like “Lost” and “Castle Rock”) and shepherding a number of high profile franchises (“Mission: Impossible,” “Star Trek,” “Star Wars,” and his own “Cloverfield”). He’s a force of nature. And today’s his birthday! So we thought we’d rundown all of his big screen directorial efforts, mystery boxes and all.

    5. ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ (2013)

    Paramount

    Truth be told, “Star Trek Into Darkness” isn’t terrible. It’s opening sequences, previewed during IMAX presentations of “The Hobbit” the year before, are some of the filmmaker’s best work (the near-miss escape from an indigenous planet, with the Enterprise rising from the ocean, and a nearly wordless sequence that ends in a terrorist attack), and Peter Weller makes a suitably menacing villain. But so much of the sequel felt unnecessary, from Alice Eve in her underwear to the hoops everyone went through denying that Benedict Cumberbatch played iconic ‘Trek’ baddie Khan. (I still don’t understand it.) Adding insult to injury was the prolonged delay in between movies; they waited four years for a follow-up and this is what they came up with? All that hope, all that promise … and after one more, slightly livelier sequel, the big screen franchise is all but kaput. Abrams’ direction remained strong but his grip on storytelling and character faltered.

    4. ‘Mission: Impossible III’ (2006)

    Paramount

    The story goes that Tom Cruise chose Abrams as the next director in the beloved franchise after marathoning episodes of his ABC spy series “Alias.” And, truth be told, “Mission: Impossible III” plays like a much longer version of that show, from his insistence on TV-friendly close-ups to the structural quirk of starting the movie with one of the last scenes and then spending the rest of the running time catching up to that point. (Many episodes of “Alias” were structured identically.) There are a handful of absolutely unforgettable sequences in “Mission: Impossible III,” most notably the set piece at the Vatican, which remains a highlight of the entire franchise, but compared to the other films in the series, it feels somewhat safe and predictable, although it has informed all of the films that followed (JJ has remained a producer on the subsequent installments).

    3. ‘Super 8’ (2011)

    Paramount

    Abrams loves the art of surprise, so he launched “Super 8” in secret, releasing a teaser that showed a train crash and mysterious text about a section of Area 51 being closed down. The actual film, a sweet-natured Spielberg-y romp (only this one was actually produced by Spielberg) set in 1979, was far sweeter than those initial teases suggested, following a group of young filmmakers who uncover a mystery following that train crash. But none of the pieces of “Super 8” add up to much; the titular footage reveals something the audience (and most of the characters) have known for a while (and the other reading of “Super 8” being the group of kids only works if you include the sister and photo shop guy, and they’re never really together). Plus, the creature, who regularly eats the townspeople, is too menacing to be a cuddly “E.T.”-style chum. (It also feels oddly rushed, with scenes not aligning properly.) This was a movie that I wanted to love so badly. Instead, it’s an object of mild curiosity instead, both personal (it’s the only movie Abrams has written and directed by himself) and removed (it’s very pastiche-y).

    2. ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ (2015)

    Lucasfilm

    People like to knock “The Force Awakens” for being too similar to “A New Hope,” but the very first “Star Wars” film set up an ironclad template for the kind of rousing adventure that Abrams knew he had to return the franchise to. (The less said about the prequels, the better.) That template served as a way to introduce indelible new characters, good and bad (including Rey, Finn, Poe, Kylo and BB-8) while also finding room for the old guard (including Leia and Han Solo), while turning the main character of the original trilogy into an uncanny MacGuffin (only Abrams could cram Luke Skywalker into one of his mystery boxes). As the first film in a new series of movies made after Disney’s lucrative purchase of Lucasfilm, there was pressure on the filmmaking to make something that really delivered. And it did. It’s an incredibly lovable, charming movie, full of warmth and suspense, action and drama, that harkens back not only to the original film but to the old series that Lucas was basing “Star Wars” on. Sure, it sometimes mirrors the original a little too closely (would it have killed them to design some new ships), and the events in between “Return of the Jedi” and this movie remain fuzzy (so the Empire fell only to be replaced by something that was exactly like the Empire?), but that doesn’t really take away from the fun of the film. It also expertly set the table for the new trilogy’s true masterpiece “The Last Jedi.” We’ll see if Abrams can wrap everything up as nicely as he began it.

    1. ‘Star Trek’ (2009)

    Paramount

    It’s telling that Abrams has remade “Star Wars” twice and his actual “Star Wars” movie is the second-best one. 2009’s “Star Trek” is still a nearly unparalleled dazzler, a canny prequel/reboot that feels wholly fresh and original, with a nifty plot (involving time travel and alternate dimensions) that doesn’t negate the films that came before it. Abrams brilliantly cast the movie, introducing a host of fresh faces playing iconic roles that, by the time the film was released, had become more punchline than anything else. (“Star Trek: Nemesis” was an inglorious end to the Enterprise’s big screen adventures, critically lambasted and commercially ignored.) Breathlessly told, with inventive set pieces (the opening attack sequence, particularly when the sound effects go away and leave room for Michael Giacchino’s soaring score, is enough to bring tears to your eyes) and memorable new characters (Eric Bana’s Nero is terrific – wry and scary). After the promise of “Mission: Impossible III,” Abrams showed himself to be an honest-to-goodness filmmaker, able to improbably invigorating moribund franchises with vitality, humor and boundless energy. It feels like I’ve watched “Star Trek” a thousand times and it also feels like I could watch it a thousand more.

  • Chris Hemsworth Was Nearly Gambit in ‘X-Men: Origins’ (And Might Do a Buddy Comedy With Chris Evans?)

    Chris Hemsworth Was Nearly Gambit in ‘X-Men: Origins’ (And Might Do a Buddy Comedy With Chris Evans?)

    Marvel

    Chris Hemsworth was almost Gambit in “X-Men: Origins“? That’s one of the tidbits that comes up in his new interview with “Variety.”

    “I got very close to ‘GI Joe,’” he says of the action hero played by Channing Tatum in the 2009 summer hit. “I got very close to Gambit in the Wolverine ‘X-Men’ movies.” Instead, Taylor Kitsch was cast. “At the time I was upset,” Hemsworth says. “I was running out of money. But if I played either of those characters, I wouldn’t have been able to play Thor.”

    It’s very lucky for us he didn’t land either of those (frankly terrible) movies and instead became the perfect Thor.

    Even after landing the career-making role, he was worried that the sequels wouldn’t happen. Or that he’d be recast. But it all worked out and he’s now played Thor in 8 MCU films. And has left the door open for more.

    He’s become such good friends with the other MCU cast, especially Chris Evans. “[We] have a real brotherly bond. I think they wouldn’t pair us up on this press tour, because we just spend the whole time screwing around and none of it is on topic,” he said.

    Evans confirmed this was true. “We had too much fun together, and truly like kids in school, we were separated because we weren’t getting s**t done.” He also told Variety he’d love to reteam with Hemsworth: “I would love to do one of those ’80s buddy comedies, where we could shed the characters we are known for.” YES PLEASE.

    Now that he’s in a position to choose his movies, which is why he turned down the still up-in-the-air fourth “Star Trek” film, which would have reunited him with Chris Pine. “I didn’t feel like we landed on a reason to revisit that yet,” he told Variety. “I didn’t want to be underwhelmed by what I was going to bring to the table.”

    As for those Bond rumors, he says he’s open to the idea (he wouldn’t be the first Aussie Bond, after all.) But he has someone else in mind: “My vote would be Idris Elba. I think he’d give it a different sort of swagger, too, and each time someone new comes into the role, I think you’ve got to offer up something different.”

    Next up, as if we have to tell you, Hemsworth reteams with Tessa Thompson for “Men in Black: International,” which opens June 13.

    Read the whole interview, including the bit where he talks about nearly quitting “Ghostbusters” the day before filming, at Variety.

     

  • ‘Star Trek: Picard’ Teaser Trailer Explores Patrick Stewart’s Retirement Years

    ‘Star Trek: Picard’ Teaser Trailer Explores Patrick Stewart’s Retirement Years

    CBS

    “Why did you leave Starfleet, Admiral?”

    That chilling question lingers over the first teaser trailer for “Star Trek: Picard,” the upcoming CBS All-Access series that brings back Patrick Stewart as the venerated leader who once captained the Enterprise on “Star Trek: The Next Generation.”

    The teaser is comprised of sun-dappled footage from Picard’s winery, where he has retired after his space-exploring career. But in voiceover, a woman wonders what an “unimaginable” tragedy cost Picard. “Your faith in us? Your faith in yourself?”

    Showrunner Alex Kurtzman has described the series as a contemplative character study. “What happens when circumstances have conspired to not give him the happiest of endings?” he told the L.A. Times. “Hopefully, it’s a reinforcement of [“Star Trek” creator Gene] Roddenberry’s vision of optimism. He’s going to have to go through deep valleys to get back to the light.”

    “Star Trek: Picard” does not yet have a premiere date.

  • Patrick Stewart’s New ‘Star Trek’ Series Gets Official Title, Logo

    Patrick Stewart’s New ‘Star Trek’ Series Gets Official Title, Logo

    Paramount

    “Star Trek: Picard” is ready to engage.

    CBS All-Access announced the official title of the upcoming series starring Patrick Stewart as his iconic “The Next Generation” captain, Jean-Luc Picard.

    The title is simple and straightforward: “Star Trek: Picard.”

    At the upfronts, CBS also unveiled the show’s official logo:

    Stewart played the wise and inspiring leader on the syndicated TV series from 1987 to 1994, then in four feature films.

    Not much is known about the story of the new show, aside from following Picard in the next stage of his life. Showrunner Alex Kurtzman has said it will be “extremely different” from previous series, including its CBS All-Access sibling “Discovery.”

    “‘Discovery’ is a bullet. ‘Picard’ is a very contemplative show,” he explained. “It will find a balance between the speed of ‘Discovery’ and the nature of what ‘Next Gen’ was, but I believe it will have its own rhythm.”

    Joining Stewart are cast members Alison Pill, Santiago Cabrera, and Michelle Hurd.

    “Star Trek: Picard” does not yet have a premiere date.

  • Every Star Trek Movie, Ranked

    Every Star Trek Movie, Ranked

  • 15 Things You Never Knew About ‘Star Trek’ on its 10th Anniversary

    15 Things You Never Knew About ‘Star Trek’ on its 10th Anniversary

    Paramount Pictures

    It’s now been ten years since Paramount Pictures rebooted one of the greatest sci-fi franchises of all time and gave us a brand new “Star Trek.” This film helped reinvigorate the franchise and made stars out of the likes of Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and Zoe Saldana. While we continue the wait for a a fourth movie that may never happen, enjoy this fun trivia about the making of this epic reboot.

    1. The origins of the reboot can be traced as far back as 1968, when “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry announced at a fan convention his plans to create a movie prequel detailing the formation of the Enterprise crew.

    2. Before this film materialized, Paramount was developing a different reboot called “Star Trek: The Beginning.” This version would have been set during the Earth-Romulan War and centered around Kirk’s ancestor Tiberius Chase.

    Paramount Pictures

    3. The crew relied on an abandoned Budweiser plant factories to depict the cluttered engine rooms of the Enterprise.

    4. John Cho was initially reluctant to play the role of Hikaru Sulu, as Cho is Korean American and Sulu is Japanese American. However, original Sulu actor George Takei encouraged Cho to take the part.

    5. In certain scenes, the special effects team had to completely reanimate Eric Bana and Leonard Nimoy‘s mouths. That’s because Bana severely injured his teeth and Nimoy’s dialogue was changed during the older Spock’s first encounter with Kirk.

    Paramount Pictures

    6. Kirk is shown eating an apple during the Kobayashi Maru training sequence. This mirrors a scene from “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” where an older Kirk eats an apple while recounting the story of that infamous scandal.  According to director J.J. Abrams, this homage was completely accidental.

    7. Winona Ryder was cast as Spock’s mother Amanda, despite being only six years older than Zachary Quinto. This is because the film was originally supposed to include an early scene of Amanda giving birth to her son.

    Paramount Pictures

    8. “Star Trek: The Next Generation” star Wil Wheaton provided voiceover dialogue for many of the Romulans on Nero’s ship.

    9. Karl Urban‘s Dr. McCoy mentions joining Starfleet after going through a nasty divorce. This pays homage to an unused story from writer D.C. Fontana, which was originally written for Season 3 of the TV series.

    10. There’s a reason Nero is MIA for so long in between traveling into the past and battling the Enterprise crew. A deleted subplot reveals that Nero  and his crew were captured by Klingons and imprisoned for several decades.

    IDW Publishing

    11. IDW Publishing released several tie-in comic books that flesh out the events surrounding the film.  2009’s “Star Trek: Countdown” explores the events that led to Nero’s journey into the past and features Captain Picard as a major character. 2010’s “Star Trek: Nero” expands on the movie’s deleted Klingon subplot.

    12. This turned out to be the final “Star Trek” film Majel Roddenberry worked on. Barrett provided the voice of Starfleet’s computers dating back to the original TV series. She passed way in December 2008, two weeks after completing her dialogue for the reboot.

    Paramount Pictures

    13. A lucky few fans were given a surprise early screening in April 2019. The Alamo Drafthouse advertised a screening of “The Wrath of Khan” with a special 10-minute preview of the reboot. Instead, Nimoy and the film’s writers interrupted the film and asked attendees if they’d rather watch the new “Star Trek” instead.

    14. Paramount initially planned for a fourth film in the reboot series to follow 2016’s “Star Trek Beyond,” one which would bring back Chris Hemsworth as George Kirk. However, the film was canceled in January 2019 after negotiations broke down with Pine and Hemsworth.

    Paramount Pictures

    15. “Star Trek” may be getting rebooted all over again. Quentin Tarantino has pitched his idea for a movie and has voiced an interest in directing after completing work on “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”

    29301
  • The 11 Best Franchise Reboots, From ‘The Mummy’ to ‘Spider-Man: Homecoming’

    The 11 Best Franchise Reboots, From ‘The Mummy’ to ‘Spider-Man: Homecoming’

  • Quentin Tarantino Still Wants to Make a ‘Star Trek’ Movie

    Quentin Tarantino Still Wants to Make a ‘Star Trek’ Movie

    Oscars.org

    While Quentin Tarantino is busy finishing his next movie “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” (and re-editing “The Hateful Eight” for Netflix), he hasn’t forgotten about “Star Trek.”

    Talking to Slashfilm, Tarantino said that his boarding that particular franchise is “a very big possibility. I haven’t been dealing with those guys for a while cause I’ve been making my movie. But we’ve talked about a story and a script. The script has been written and when I emerge my head like Punxsutawney Phil, post-‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,’ we’ll pick up talking about it again.”

    QT reportedly first pitched his R-rated “Star Trek” to Paramount in 2017. If Tarantino does decide to boldly go into the Trekverse, it’s likely he’d need a whole new cast.

    After three feature films, beginning with J. J. Abram’s 2009 reboot, a fourth film with that lineup is looking less and less likely. Chris Pine said he’s still game to play Captain Kirk, even though negotiations over money have gotten nowhere.

    [Via Slashfilm]

  • Santiago Cabrera, Michelle Hurd Join Jean-Luc Picard-Focused ‘Star Trek’ Series

    Santiago Cabrera, Michelle Hurd Join Jean-Luc Picard-Focused ‘Star Trek’ Series

    Santiago Cabrera and Michelle Hurd split
    HBO; NBC

    CBS All Access’ untitled “Star Trek” series centered on the next chapter of Jean-Luc Picard has added two new stars: Santiago Cabrera and Michelle Hurd. The two actors join Patrick Stewart, who will reprise his role as Captain Picard from the iconic series “Star Trek: The Next Generation.”

    CBS All Access announced the casting Monday but did not reveal character details. The two actors are both experienced, though. Cabrera comes to the project having recently starred in CBS’s “Salvation” and HBO “Big Little Lies.” Meanwhile, Hurd starred in NBC’s “Blindspot” and recently had a role in Fox’s “Lethal Weapon.”

    The upcoming series is the latest addition to the Star Trek franchise on CBS All Access. The network debuted “Star Trek: Discovery” in 2017, which is currently in its second season. Executive producer Alex Kurtzman has teased that the new series will be “extremely different,” and sources told Moviefone in August that it is set after the events off 2002’s “Star Trek: Nemesis.”

    The new show comes from CBS Television Studios in association with Secret Hideout and Roddenberry Entertainment. Executive producers include Stewart, Kurtzman, James Duff, Akiva Goldsman, Michael Chabon, Heather Kadin, Rod Roddenberry, and Trevor Roth, and Aaron Baiersis set to serve as co-executive producer.

  • An Animated ‘Star Trek’ Series Is Likely Headed to Nickelodeon

    An Animated ‘Star Trek’ Series Is Likely Headed to Nickelodeon

    Star Trek
    CBS/Paramount

    The exploration of the “Star Trek” universe continues: An animated series aimed at kids looks likely to land at Viacom’s Nickelodeon network.

    The network is close to reaching a deal for the new series, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Like other recent installments in the franchise, it comes from writer-producer Alex Kurtzman. Writers Kevin and Dan Hageman are also behind the show.

    Although the show targets a younger audience, Kurtzman has made it clear that he hopes it will appeal to a broad audience. In early February, he told Comicbook.com that “it will traditionally look younger” but added that “hopefully the [viewer] age rage is somewhere between 8 and 45.”

    “I think you’ll find that it is utterly reverent of everything we love about ‘Trek,’” Kurtzman also told the publication at the time.

    Kurtzman has plenty of experience in the “Star Trek” Universe. He served as a co-writer and executive producer for 2009’s “Star Trek” and 2013’s “Star Trek Into Darkness.” Additionally, he co-created “Star Trek: Discovery,” so the latest series is in good hands.

    The new project is one of two upcoming “Star Trek”-based animated series that are in the works, both with Kurtzman on board. One difference between them, however, is that the other, “Lower Decks,” is not aimed at kids. Its home will be CBS All Access, just like the live-action series “Star Trek: Discovery.”

    No timeline for the new animated series’ release has been announced.

    [via: THR]