Tag: sigourney-weaver

  • Sigourney Weaver Says the ‘Avatar’ Sequels are ‘More Amazing’ Than the Original

    30th Annual American Cinematheque Awards Gala - ArrivalsWe haven’t heard much from writer-director James Cameron since he announced that the long-delayed “Avatar” sequels would be four films instead of three. And while there still isn’t much intel to go on, actress Sigourney Weaver has promised fans that the flicks will be worth the (seemingly never-ending) wait.

    In an interview with Variety, Weaver chatted about several of her upcoming projects, including those four much-discussed — but still quite mysterious — sequels, which the actress described as “looming” over her. While the sci-fi veteran didn’t elaborate on what that meant in terms of a shooting schedule, she did say that she’s seen three of the four the screenplays (in what stage of completion is unclear), and had nothing but praise for the stories that awaited filmgoers.

    “In my opinion, the three scripts I’ve read so far are many times more amazing than the first one in terms of their scope,” Weaver told Variety. “[Cameron] did a lot of the heavy lifting in the first movie, establishing the family and the relationships and the world, and now he really gets to play.”

    According to the trade, the four sequels will be “a family saga,” though what exactly that means is anyone”s guess. It does give us some hope, though, that Cameron is on track to finally begin production on these new films, after the plan for the sequels was changed from two films, to three, to four, and the release date for the first follow-up shifted from 2014 to 2016 to 2017, to the new tentative schedule: “Avatar 2,” “Avatar 3,” “Avatar 4,” and “Avatar 5” are currently slated to hit theaters around Christmastime in 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2023, respectively.

    Stay tuned to see if the plan changes again. Based on everything that’s happened so far, we wouldn’t be surprised by anything at this point.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

  • ‘Aliens’: 11 Things You (Probably) Didn’t Know About James Cameron’s Classic

    As terrifying as 1979’s “Alien” was, the scale and breathless intensity of “Aliens” — released 30 years ago this week, on July 18, 1986 — made the original seem like a chamber drama. Or, as franchise mainstay Sigourney Weaver put it, “It made the first ‘Alien’ look like a cucumber sandwich.”

    James Cameron‘s overstuffed hoagie of an interstellar horror thriller proved that 1984’s “The Terminator” wasn’t a fluke and made him into an A-list action/sci-fi director. It also made Weaver into the premier action heroine of our time, and it transformed “Alien” from a cult hit into a franchise whose sequels, prequels, and spinoffs continue to this day. Still, there’s a lot you may not know about the drama behind the scenes. Here’s the dish behind Ripley’s finest hour. 1. James Cameron (above) received two job offers on the same day: to write the screenplay for “Rambo: First Blood Part II” and to write and direct “Aliens.” Maybe that’s why there’s some similarity between the movies. Cameron has said he wanted to make “Aliens” feel like a Vietnam War film, with the Marines comprising a battle-weary platoon under attack from a technologically inferior (but relentlessly determined) native force. (For good measure, he had the cast read Robert Heinlein’s “Starship Troopers.”) Weaver jokingly referred to the Ripley of “Aliens” as “Rambolina.”
    2. Weaver almost didn’t make it into the movie. Cameron wrote the script around Ripley without knowing that 20th Century Fox didn’t have a deal in place with the actress. The studio ordered him to write her out of the picture, but he threatened to walk instead.

    Eventually, the studio acknowledged Weaver was essential to the film and agreed to pay her $1 million, her biggest paycheck yet at that point in her career. It was about 30 times what she was paid in 1979 for the initial “Alien,” when she was an unknown.
    3. The filmmakers didn’t want the girl playing Newt to seem too polished and professional, so their casting search led them to untried nine-year-old Carrie Henn (above). Henn has since said she thoroughly enjoyed making the movie, but despite receiving rave reviews, she never acted professionally again and instead became a schoolteacher.
    4. Lance Henriksen had to film the knife trick twice. The fear on Bill Paxton‘s face was real, since he didn’t know before the day of shooting that Cameron was going to have Henriksen do the trick on Paxton’s hand. Nonetheless, the director didn’t think the sped-up footage looked plausible, so he planned a reshoot for the next day. Supposedly, Henriksen came to work hungover, and this time, he accidentally cut Paxton’s pinky and drew blood.5. Shooting at England’s Pinewood Studios, Cameron and producer Gale Anne Hurd (left) had a hard time winning the loyalty of the British crew. They hadn’t yet seen “The Terminator,” so they regarded the director as a relative amateur. And they didn’t take Hurd seriously because she was Cameron’s wife, and they assumed she was hired only out of nepotism. Also, they routinely took tea breaks in mid-afternoon, leading Cameron to grumble about their work ethic. Eventually, Cameron quashed the mini-rebellion by firing and replacing the cinematographer.
    6. Jenette Goldstein, who played Vasquez (above), didn’t really know how to handle a firearm, so when you see close-ups of her shooting her weapon, you’re actually looking at Hurd’s hands.
    7. Weaver, too, was no firearm expert; in fact, she didn’t think Ripley should wield a gun at all. But Cameron took her to a firing range, and she soon decided that shooting was fun. “Another liberal bites the dust,” Cameron joked on the DVD commentary.
    8. The alien queen was an elaborate puppet created in the workshop of legendary monster designer Stan Winston. It was 14 feet tall and required 16 operators, manipulating it with a combination of control rods, hydraulics, radio controls, and a crane.
    9. “Aliens” cost just $18.5 million to make, which seems like an absurdly low figure by the standards of today’s summer blockbuster sequel filmmaking. (Nowadays, it would cost 10 times that.) It returned $85 million in North America (and a total of $131 million worldwide) to become the seventh highest-grossing film of 1986.
    10. The movie was nominated for seven Oscars, including Best Actress for Weaver (a rare honor from an Academy that usually ignores performances in sci-fi and fantasy features), Best Score (even though composer James Horner had to rush to complete the music before having seen the whole movie), Best Sound, Best Editing, and Best Art Direction. It won for Sound Effects Editing and Visual Effects.
    11. In 2011, Weaver told Moviefone that, while she’d love to make another Ripley movie, she despaired that it would ever happen. Now, however, the 66-year-old actress is attached to a sequel from “District 9” director Neill Blomkamp. The new film (above), if it ever gets off the ground, will ignore the events of 1990s sequels “Alien 3” and “Alien Resurrection” and pick up where “Aliens” left off. To quote Vasquez, “Let’s rock!”

    %Slideshow-335179%

  • 9 Reasons Dana Barrett From ‘Ghostbusters’ Is the Ultimate ’80s Bae

    How could you ever stop crushing on Dana Barrett? The “Ghostbusters” leading lady stole our hearts, even when she transformed into demon spirit Zuul. The iconic ’80s character played by Sigourney Weaver (seriously, who else?) had a sweet job, a closet full of shoulder pads, and she got to hang with the Ghostbusters. Here are 9 reasons why Dana Barrett is THE BAE of the ’80s.

  • Sigourney Weaver Will Also Cameo in ‘Ghostbusters’ (No Word on Zuul)

    American Ballet Theatre's 75th Anniversary Diamond Jubilee Spring GalaPaul Feig‘s upcoming take on “Ghostbusters” is shaping up to be more of a reunion than a reboot, with original star Sigourney Weaver officially joining the cast.

    Weaver, who played Dana Barrett in 1984’s “Ghostbusters” and 1989’s “Ghostbusters II,” is set to make an appearance in the new flick, according to Feig. The director, in an effort to stave off too many spoilers, revealed the news himself on Twitter, calling the actress “awesome.”

    There’s no word on whether or not Weaver will be playing Barrett, though we’re assuming that like her other fellow original “Ghostbusters” stars Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, and Annie Potts, she’ll be making a cameo as a new character. And just look at that list, folks — the fact that Feig was able to wrangle so many members of the original cast (RIP, Harold Ramis) is a miracle in and of itself; whoever they’re all playing, fans should be pleased so see them on the big screen together regardless.

    The only major holdout left is Rick Moranis. Fingers crossed Feig can snag him, too.

    “Ghostbusters” stars Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, and Chris Hemsworth. It hits theaters on July 15, 2016.

    [via: Paul Feig]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-198428%

  • Neill Blomkamp Reveals New ‘Alien’ Concept Art Featuring Ripley

    alien, alien concept art, ripley, sigourney weaver, michael biehnDirector Neill Blomkamp is showing off some nifty new concept art for his upcoming “Alien” flick, and it features some old favorites from the franchise.

    The illustrated image, which Blomkamp shared on his Instagram page, showcases Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) and Corporal Hicks (Michael Biehn), who both appear tense and serious. They’re face to face with someone sporting a bulky, metallic-looking suit, which also has the South Korean flag on it.

    #alien going very well. Love this project

    A photo posted by Brownsnout (@neillblomkamp) on


    What any of that means is anyone’s guess, but it’s a cool inside look at the filmmaking process. As Blomkamp said in the picture’s caption, the production is “going very well” and he “love[s] this project.”

    It remains to be seen whether or not fans will love it, considering it will ignore the last two films in the franchise. But the return of Weaver and Biehn bodes well for the flick, and Blomkamp seems like such a fan of the material, that we’re sure he’ll do it justice. (Having original “Alien” director Ridley Scott on board as a producer doesn’t hurt, either.)

    Stay tuned for more — it seems Blomkamp is only just getting started offering fans behind-the-scenes glimpses of the project.

    [via: Neill Blomkamp]

    Photo credit: Neill Blomkamp

    %Slideshow-204126%

  • ‘District 9’ Director Neill Blomkamp Talks About His ‘Alien’ Movie (EXCLUSIVE)

    Over the past few months director Neill Blomkamp, whose robotic crime movie “Chappie” opens next month (and who, contrary to Twitter scuttlebutt, is very good indeed), has released a series of cryptic images over his Instagram account that suggest he was in the process of developing a new movie set within the “Alien” universe. Well, it looks like that is very much the case, as Deadline is reporting that Blomkamp has been hired to direct a new installment in the franchise, to be produced by series overlord Ridley Scott. True to form, Blomkamp took to Instagram, posting a photo of the xenomorph and saying it’s “officially my next film.” Zounds!

    Deadline was quick to point out that Scott is still actively developing a sequel to “Prometheus,” which he will once again produce and direct. There is no timeline on either project but both are moving forward (even without workable scripts). We chatted with Blomkamp a couple of weeks ago and asked him about those “Alien” images. Read what he had to say below!

    Moviefone: What were those “Alien” images you put up on Instagram?

    Neill Blomkamp: I spent a lot of 2014 on post-production on “Chappie,” coming up with an “Alien” film that I wanted to make. But then I wasn’t sure that I wanted to do any film. I’m still not sure I’m going to do any film at all. But I figured that I might as well put some of it out because it’s cool stuff. I probably put out 5-10 percent of what I developed. It’s pretty far along actually.

    Have you pitched this to Fox?

    No. But Fox would make it in a second. It’s just a case of deciding to move forward or not.

    Why wouldn’t you?

    I wouldn’t. Not because of “Alien.” Because if I was the younger me, I would kick myself in the head for not doing an “Alien” movie. It’s more a case of making sure that Hollywood and film is the right platform for me. It’s more a Is film the right place for me? question than it is specific to the project.

    Why are you having these doubts?

    Because Hollywood is lame. It’s corporately run. It’s not very artistic. And if it is artistic you have to fight. You have to shed blood to make it artistic. There are other platforms where you can just be artistic. You’d reach a lot less people but that’s okay. I’m not saying I’m leaving film because I probably won’t but I’m just assessing.

    Did you talk to Sigourney Weaver about it?

    Yes. Speaking to her about what she thought about Ripley and where she went in the movies and her thoughts on it are what led to that concept.
    %Slideshow-253813%