Tag: robot-chicken

  • ‘The Hero’ Star Sam Elliott Knows Why He’s Having a ‘McConaissance’ Right Now

    Sam Elliott‘s played the hero many times on screen, but his performance in the film “The Hero” — where he plays a journeyman actor taking a long, hard look at his life — will likely be remembered as a career-high.

    At 72, Elliott’s already enjoyed a rich and often varied Hollywood career in both film and television, beginning with an early role in “Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid” and a star-making turn in the 1976 beachside drama “Lifeguard.” He went on to have a steady string of TV and film roles throughout the ’70s, ’80s, and ’90s, including “The Shadow Riders,” “The Quick and the Dead,” “Conagher, “Buffalo Girls,” and “Tombstone“).

    Along the way, Elliott would have opportunities to make a dramatic impact with roles outside the Western box including several that showcased his considerable acting skills, like “Mask” and the Civil War drama “Gettysburg”; rough and rowdy action flicks like “Road House,” and comic book fare like “Hulk” and “Ghost Rider.” And his signature mustache and deeply resonant and distinctive voice were elevated to iconic status with his appearance as the narrating Stranger in the Coen brothers’ cult sensation “The Big Lebowski.”

    Thanks to the final season of FX’s “Justified,” where he played the main baddie, Elliott has found himself with a career renaissance, which he sat down with Moviefone to have a very candid discussion about.
    Moviefone: Obviously, people are going to see what they think is some of Sam Elliott in this guy. Tell me the diversions. Tell me what you related to in Lee Hayden, but what is entirely different from your own experience.

    Sam Elliott: Number one, if it was me, it’d be a documentary, and it’s not, clearly. There’s four primary elements that are most glaringly not me: one of them is that I’m still married to Katharine [Ross] for 33 years, after knowing her for 39 years. I have a close, loving relationship with my daughter Cleo -– I see her all the time, and was primarily there when she was growing up; I don’t smoke dope; and I don’t have cancer. So beyond those, there’s a lot of similarities.

    What resonated with you about those similarities? As you delved into Lee, what did you have a lot of empathy for?

    I had a lot of empathy, I think, because I understood where he was going after he got the diagnosis in the beginning, and realized that time was going to be short, and he had a big mess to clean up with his family, primarily. Also, to have to deal with the fact that his career was pretty much what it was.

    The rest of it was all in his head, which kept revisiting him in the form of the dreams. He fucked up his career, doing whatever he did, whatever it was that made him lose his connection to his daughter, whatever made him get divorced from his wife, and why ever it was he never went beyond that one film that he talks about -– that’s it.

    I think that at his core, Lee was a decent guy. I think the things that he spoke of at the awards ceremony were from his heart and soul, and that resonated completely with me what he was talking about in there. I happen to believe that he was telling the truth in there.

    From your perspective, what has it taken to survive and to thrive in Hollywood for as long as you’ve been able to?

    Persistence, hard work, being a decent person, treating people right, and doing your job when you get an opportunity to do it.

    You’ve been doing your job pretty well for all these years, and all of a sudden, we’re in this great Sam Elliott Renaissance Period.

    Crazy!

    Did you see it coming? Was it part of a strategic plan?

    No, came totally out of left field. There was a succession of jobs that came, and I’m not sure where it started: whether it was at “Grandma,” whether it was maybe at “Parks and Rec,” could have been at “Robot Chicken,” I don’t know… Then “Justified” came along –- it’s very bizarre!

    Do you feel that you’re a better actor now than you were when you began in Hollywood?

    Yes, no question. No question. I think time and grade is the teacher in any field. I just think the longer you’re there, the better you get. Unless you’re an athlete -– you start wearing out.

    It’s been great to see you in a lot of very different kinds of roles lately, including your first sitcom. What’s been fun about “The Ranch” for you?

    It’s totally different. New ground to plow. At 72, at almost 50 years in the business, to be able to go and do a four-camera show in front of a live audience on Fridays. We pre-tape on Thursdays, Friday’s a live audience. Just that experience alone… But to be working with Ashton Kutcher and Daniel Masterson on the set, Debra Winger as well, and Jim Patterson and Don Reo and these genius writers that are on this writing staff.

    We do a script every week. And from Monday, the table read, we get our new script on Fridays after the taping. Monday we do a table read and a blocking rehearsal. Monday night, they rewrite. Tuesdays we rehearse. Tuesday night, they rewrite. Wednesdays we rehearse. Wednesday night, they rewrite. Thursdays we start shooting, and they’re, at the same time, rewriting. Friday is the taping night in front of the audience. All the writers are on the set — watching it and rewriting between takes. So the learning curve is a monster, and it’s daunting in front of a live audience for me.

    Had it been a while?

    I’ve never worked in front of a live audience. The great reward in front of a live audience is you hear people laughing. That part is a lot of fun.
    Lee had one movie that he was proud of. You, I’m sure, have many. If somebody discovers you for the first time through “The Hero,” what films of yours would you like to point people to if they were interested at looking at highlights from your filmography?

    A lot of my favorite parts are character parts. They’re not like leading roles by any means. Whether it’s “Mask” or “Road House” or “The Big Lebowski,” or “Gettysburg,” there are things about a lot of different films that stand out for me.

    In terms of lead, maybe “Conagher,” something like that. Only because it’s something that I did with Katharine. It was something that Louis L’Amour told me that he thought Katharine and I should do. In fact, we did the adaptation of the book. I produced. It was very successful at the time that we did it with TNT. That probably would be a highlight, for sure.

    When you started out, did you think of yourself as a character actor? Or were you thinking leading man when you got into it?

    I wasn’t thinking about anything other than acting and wanting a good part. I never thought about it in terms of character and leading man. Still don’t.

    What do you love, after all this time? What are the same things that you love about the industry and Hollywood, and what are the sort of new things that even at this stage you’re discovering you love?

    I think just going to work. I think the work of it is the thing I most love. It’s the doing of it. I’m completely amazed from day to day about this whole digital effect that it’s had on the game, that it can move at the pace that it moves.

    It’s like instant gratification. It’s like, “How was it?” “I don’t know -– let’s look.” Everybody’s walking around with their little screens like this, sitting at the monitor, instant playback. No lab to go to. No lab report to wait for. No opening up the can and exposing the film to the light and losing it, and having it come back. Incredible.

    It’s your next frontier.

    It’s incredible. Never going to be my frontier. All I do with my cell phone is answer it and talk on it and I text on it. That’s as deep as I’m going to go.

    “The Hero” opens in select cities Friday.

  • Bryan Cranston Loves His ‘SuperMansion’ Superhero — and Would Play Walter White Again

    The 23rd Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards - Red CarpetSure, you’re following all of the Marvel- and DC-related comic book superhero shows, but if you’re not watching “SuperMansion’s” League of Freedom, you might be missing the funniest — and maybe even the most poignant — take on the cape and costume crowd.

    As the stop-motion-animated series returns to Crackle for a second season of misadventures from the over-the-hill, dysfunctional crimefighting team, co-creators Robot Chicken”) joined leading voice actor and executive producer Bryan Cranston for a press roundtable tackling an array of predictably silly surprisingly deep subjects.

    What do you bring of yourself to this character?

    Bryan Cranston: I don’t need boner pills! Let’s get that out there! You know, it’s similar to doing live-action, in the sense that when an actor takes on a character, it’s a marriage of words and ideas to what the actor’s sensibility is, and you find where that is. There are times when I’m directed to punch certain things, and I go, “Oh, yeah, I see! He’s more upset at this point.”

    And then, there are times when I bring in my own personality and they go, “Oh, that’s good! Let’s go on that track!” I’ll do certain things or make certain sounds that the guys will respond to and go, “Oh, that’s good!” Early on, as we were feeling through the character, I think it was Zeb that said, “I don’t know, it just feels better when he’s really angry. He’s just really upset.” And then I have to figure out why.

    It’s because he’s losing his sense of relevance. He feels it slipping away, so he’s desperately clutching onto these things. That made it easier for me.

    It doesn’t matter if it’s animated or live-action, you’re still developing a character, you want to be consistent with that character and you’re contributing to the storylines. It’s as engaging as live-action development.

    Did you have to learn a lot about the superhero culture, tropes and references for this?

    Cranston: I’ve never been a comic book guy, so I look at it just from the justification of the character’s emotional sense. What does he want? What does he feel? Who does he want to be around? What is he losing? Who is he afraid of? That always mixes in fine. The more you humanize superhero characters, the more they’re relatable. The more they have a vulnerable point, whether it’s emotionally or their superpower, or whatever, we relate the superpower or the loss of a superpower to their emotions. It’s just fun to walk through that.

    Zeb Wells: And it was important to us that you didn’t have to know a bunch of comic book superhero references to find the jokes funny. We wanted the characters to be funny in their interactions and have very human conflicts, and have that be the basis of the comedy.

    Matt Senreich: You have these insane superpowers, but that’s irrelevant. It’s about humanizing them and grounding them in a way that we can all relate to.

    Matt and Zeb, what made you think of Bryan for this role?

    Senreich: We were afraid to ask him. We wrote the part, and in the script, it says, “A Bryan Cranston type.” We had our buddy, Seth Green, play the part for the temp animatic, and we realized that voice wasn’t good. He just turned to us and lectured us on how we’re very chicken and we should just reach out to Bryan.

    To Bryan’s credit, we sent him the role and within 24 or 48 hours, we got a call back. It was beyond flattering. He was like, “I don’t want to just play this part. I want to make this show with you.” It just took off from there.

    Cranston: For me, if it didn’t have an interesting story to it, I wouldn’t be sitting here. But the idea of a household full of superheroes who are perhaps past their prime and trying to hold on to what’s left of their dignity and abilities appeals to me. And having sequences where the superheroes go shopping and do household chores was a really good idea.

    What did the success of the first season give you permission to do with Season 2?

    Wells: It was seeing how well exploring the humanity of the characters ended up working. With the second season, we could push the drama a little bit and trust that the characters we’d created and that the actors helped us create would make those situations funny.

    So if you look at Season 2 on paper, some of the episodes would sound more dramatic and that the stakes are a lot higher, but they’re all just as funny because we still have this band of idiots. We were really able to take the brakes off and do high-stakes superhero adventures. It’s really fun.

    Senreich: We saw how pairing certain characters together worked or didn’t work, in certain ways, and what conflict built from their politics and their boyfriend-girlfriend relationships.

    Does animation give you an advantage in discussing controversial topics that live-action does not?

    Senreich: Yeah, I think you can get away with a lot more animation than you can in live-action. I come from the comic book and action figure world, where violence is funny in animation. When you go back to Tom and Jerry, it plays a lot better. If you see those things in real life, you’re going to be taken aback. It allows you to over-dramatize certain relationships to get to that point you want to make.

    It just allows for you to push the envelope a little bit more, but it’s dangerous to go too far. It’s about always knowing where that limit is. There are certain topics that are too far, so it’s about where is it too far and how do you make it funny while at the same time not, and also teaching a lesson while going through a situation like that. It’s a tightrope that you walk, and as long as you’re aware of it, you’re allowed to do a little more with it.

    Matt and Zeb, how long have you guys worked together?

    Wells: Off and on, for 10 years now. We’ve known each other longer.

    Senreich: I found Zeb when I was working at a magazine called Wizard, back in the day. He entered a VHS video competition. I was probably 25, at the time, and Zeb was 20. He won that competition, and I just stayed in touch with him ’cause I thought he was a talented fella. And then, when Robot Chicken started up, I brought him on to write with us, and that was since Season 3. We’ve just been goofing around, ever since. It’s been a nice romantic interlude.

    Cranston: Matt is really one of the bosses — and he brought on Zeb to take over this show, and even though the guy who brought on the guy doesn’t agree with everything, he gave the power over to Zeb to say, “You know what? You’re running the show. You’re the showrunner, so go and do what you think is best.” That’s pretty remarkable.

    Wells: We try to run it like a relationship, where it depends on how passionate either one of us is about something. If it’s keeping Matt up at night and I just think it’s a slightly bad decision, I’ll just let him have it. And that goes both ways. The real problem is when we’re both equally passionate. Then, I don’t know how we solve it. Whoever is more stubborn wins.

    Senreich: When you know someone for as long as we’ve known each other, it doesn’t feel like there’s ever a wrong way to play it out. I do believe in the people that I work with. I’m friends with these people, and I know that’s a dangerous thing and people say not to do it, but I like going to work and smiling every day. I don’t want to work with people I don’t like.

    Titanium Rex is searching for relevance as he gets older. You, ironically, have become more relevant later in life, Bryan.

    Cranston: Try telling that to my wife! Art business is a little different. It’s a little different. And I’ll say for men, too. It’s different for men. There’s more opportunities for men. There really is. So I’m certainly the recipient of that good fortune, and I’m appreciative of it. Had it never happened, I’d still be a working actor and be fine, and not know what you miss.

    I don’t think life or this business owes me anything, so you reap what you sow. If you work hard, you have a better chance of producing something that you’re proud of. If you don’t, you won’t. And it’s really simple. Ask Warren Buffett: “All right, Warren, what’s your secret?” He goes, “Well, just make more right decisions than wrong ones.” I swear to God that’s what he says. You go, “That’s it?” He goes, “Yep, that’s it.” Wow. Make more right decisions than wrong ones.

    And it’s like, yeah, I think all of us try to do that every day. And that’s no different. This is what we try to do at work. We think this is the strongest choice. We’re not positive. We think, OK. Then it comes to us, and we’re reading it, giving notes, or reading it in the booth doing it. Then some suggestions, and they’ll take two or three different ways of doing something.

    Wells: Or if we were unsure about something … Sometimes an actor saying, “This doesn’t feel right to me either.” That’s happened with Bryan, it’s happened with Yvette [Nicole Brown]. Then you’re like, “OK, I had that in the back of my head that that might be wrong. If you think it’s wrong as well, then let’s sit down and change it.” And you have to be open to that. You have to be open to the happy accidents and discovering that stuff, where it doesn’t feel as alive, and you’re missing out on great stuff.

    Bryan, your “Breaking Bad” co-stars Aaron Paul and Betsy Brandt told me recently that if there’s any downside at all to be a part of that series it’s the high level of work that you got to do, making it hard to decide what to do next. Do you feel that way when you thought about what the projects were going to be?

    Cranston: It’s a nice, difficult position to be in. Yeah, the bar was raised with the quality of writing on that show, and you want to see if you can match that anywhere you go, and I do. I want to make sure that what I do has specific purpose, and not just throwing a dart at something to keep busy.

    This is an example of just that: that good storytelling doesn’t have to be in the form of the classics. It doesn’t have to be revered by everybody. In fact, to me, the best storytelling is not universally loved by every single person. And to me, I think you water down the efficacy of the work itself.

    Is there any chance we’re going to see Walter White on “Better Call Saul”?

    Cranston: I don’t know. You could. I actually think it’d be fun. I have not been approached by it. I know that Vince [Gilligan] wouldn’t do anything that would damage the overall brand that he’s worked so hard to develop on a stunt-cast kind of thing. Then I think, “Well, what if it’s just a brush-by? If it’s just two guys in a market. Are those ripe? I don’t know.” We don’t even register that we knew each other three years before we see each other again. That’s life.

    It’s actually very honest. It happens. So the bottom line is, I would do it in a second. If Vince wanted me to be on the show, I’d be on the show.

    What’s been the unique pleasure of doing this show, distinct from the “Robot Chicken” experience?

    Senreich: For me, “Robot Chicken” is a sketch comedy show. It’s “SNL” using action figures. It’s always been that, and we always laugh, because if you look at the staff of “Robot Chicken,” my first sold scripts were dramas with Geoff Johns as my writing partner. Zeb comes from the comic book world and was working in comic books for a while. We have two playwrights. It’s like, very odd selection of people who have worked with “Robot Chicken.”

    But this lets you tell a story where you actually can sit down, and it puts us back to our roots where we’re like, “OK, we can actually find characters, we can go into their history, we can deal with their relationships,” and that’s something that we’ve always loved to do.

    Wells: For me, there’s an animatic for a later episode, and it’s a scene between Jillian [Bell] and Bryan. And we were watching an animatic, and I got choked up watching it. It’s like, “That’s not supposed to happen in the Stoopid Buddy Stoodios, watching an animatic for one of our shows!”

    Cranston: That happens to you when you watch animated porn, too.

  • Macaulay Culkin, Bob Saget, Seth Green Take Most ’90s Selfie Ever

    bob saget, macaulay culkin, seth green, clare grant, selfieThe joy of social media means we get a glimpse into the lives of stars that we’d normally never see otherwise, and the beauty of that was proven this week when Robot Chicken,” the stop-motion series that Green co-created; it’s possible that they all met while collaborating on that show.

    However this trio was brought together, we’re glad it happened — and that we got to witness it (online, anyway).

    [via: Bob Saget, h/t E! News]

    Photo credit: Bob Saget/Instagram