Tag: robert-zemeckis

  • Marvel, Star Wars, & Pixar Updates from the Disney+ Day Announcements

    On Friday, November 12th, Disney+ celebrated its second anniversary with Disney+ Day, where they announced literally dozens of upcoming series from Marvel, Lucasfilm, Pixar and more. The presentations, which include some new clips, first looks, and upcoming announcements, can currently be viewed on Disney+, but Moviefone is here to break it all down for you.

    MARVEL

    The Marvel video presentation, which is now available on Disney+, begins with recaps of all the 2021 Marvel series that have been released so far including ‘WandaVision,’ ‘The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,’ ‘Loki,’ and ‘What If…?’ Then we get an extended trailer for ‘Hawkeye,’ which drops on November 24th. We also got to see a full scene from the show, which involves Jeremey Renner’s Hawkeye and Hailee Steinfeld’s Kate Bishop stealing a car and then getting into a chase while Hawkeye teaches Kate how to use his trick arrows. The sequence is one continuous shot, ending with the two heroes swinging off of a bridge on to a moving train.

    The official synopsis for the series confirms that it is set in a post-blip New York City and follows Clint Barton on a seemingly simple mission to get back to his family for Christmas. But when a threat from his past shows up, Hawkeye reluctantly teams up with 22-year-old skilled archer Kate Bishop to unravel a criminal conspiracy. In addition to Renner and Stanfield, the series also features Vera Farmiga (‘The Departed’), Brian d’Arcy James (‘Spotlight’) and Florence Pugh reprising her ‘Black Widow’ role as Yelena Belova.

    The video presentation also includes fans first look at Oscar Isaac in ‘Moon Knight.’ The series will follow the story of this complex vigilante who suffers from dissociative identity disorder. The multiple identities that live inside him find themselves thrusted into a deadly war of the Gods against the backdrop of modern and ancient Egypt. The clips basically show Isaac’s Marc Spencer being tortured by his dreams, with the character’s voice-over explaining that to the audience. We only get very quick glimpses of Isaac in the Moon Knight outfit, but the presentation ends with him in full costume jumping off of rooftops with the Moon lit full behind him. Actor Ethan Hawke is also set to appear as the show’s big bad.

    We also got new footage from the upcoming series, ‘She-Hulk.’ The teaser is narrated by Tatiana Maslany as Jennifer Walters/She-Hulk, as she explains that she is a lawyer but also, something else. There is a quick body shot of Jennifer fully-green with her comic book accurate costume, although it cuts away before we see She-Hulk’s face. We also get two glimpses of Mark Ruffalo, who returns as Jennifer’s cousin, Bruce Banner/Hulk.

    The first scene shows Bruce experimenting on Jennifer when she is just a child, presumably in a flashback, but what is interesting is that he is Smart Hulk in this scene. Since ‘Shang-Chi’ gave us an end-credit scene that revealed that at some point after the events of ‘Avengers: Endgame,’ Smart Hulk reverted back to Bruce, it makes you wonder if this scene takes place between ‘Endgame’ and ‘Shang-Chi.’ If that is the case, and Jennifer was a child during that time period, it makes you wonder if the bulk of the series itself will make a time jump and take place decades after ‘Endgame’? We also get a clip that looks more like a commercial, with Jennifer and Bruce dressed in retro clothes and Jennifer saying, “”Don’t make me angry, you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry,” which is clearly a nod to the 1970’s series, The Incredible Hulk.

    The last series to get new footage in the video presentation was ‘Ms. Marvel,’ which stars Iman Vellani as 16-year-old Kamala Khan. A Pakistani American and a fan-girl of the Avengers, Kamala is overjoyed when she discovers she has superpowers, and now must use them to find her place in the world. The footage shows her revealing her iconic mask for the first time and ends with Kamala standing on a New Jersey rooftop wearing a Captain Marvel Halloween Costume and preparing to use her powers to fly for the first time. Vellani is set to reprise her role, along with Teyonah Parris from ‘WandaVision’ and Brie Larson, in the upcoming feature film, ‘The Marvels.’

    But that’s not it! Marvel also announced a slew of new upcoming shows, some of which had been rumored, and also confirmed that ‘Loki’ and ‘What If…?’ will be getting second seasons. In fact, ‘What If…?’ will also be getting a spinoff with the new animated series ‘Marvel Zombies,’ which imagines a world where Marvel’s heroes have been turned into the undead. Staying with animation, Disney+ also announced a sequel to the classic 90’s animated X-Men series entitled ‘X-Men ’97,’ as well as ‘Spider-Man: Freshman Year,’ which will look at Peter Parker’s first year in high school, and ‘I Am Groot,’ a series of original shorts starring everyone’s favorite sentient tree.

    On the live-action side, ‘Secret Invasion’ was confirmed, which is based on the popular Marvel Comics series. The show will bring Samuel L. Jackson’s Nick Fury and Ben Mendelsohn’s Talos back together to fight a faction of shape-shifting Skrulls who have been infiltrating Earth for years. Also confirmed were ‘Echo,’ which will star Alaqua Cox as Maya Lopez, who will be introduced in ‘Hawkeye,’ and James Gunn will write and direct ‘The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special.’

    Marvel also announced two new series based on the Iron Man franchise. First is ‘Armor Wars,’ which will star Don Cheadle reprising his role as War Machine. The second is ‘Ironheart,’ a series that will star Dominique Thorne as Riri Williams, a genius inventor who creates the most advanced suit of armor since Iron Man. Finally, Marvel confirmed the recent rumor that Kathryn Hahn will reprise her ‘WandaVision’ role as Agatha Harkness in her own series, which will be called ‘Agatha: House of Harkness.’


    LUCASFILM

    While there was no new footage included, fans got their first look at the making of the upcoming Star Wars series, ‘Obi-Wan Kenobi.’ The video is narrated by director Debbie Chow and actor Ewan McGregor and explains what fans can expect from the new series. “For this character to come back, the fans have been waiting long enough,” said McGregor. Chow explained that this is a “dark time,” for Kenobi and that it is “not safe” for him with “Jedi hunters” on the rise. McGregor said that his character has one task, which is “to keep Luke safe,” but Chow explained how that is just a starting point for the series.

    “The most beautiful thing of all is that it has brought me back together with Hayden,” McGregor said about the return of Hayden Christensen as Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader. “We couldn’t tell the story of Obi-Wan Kenobi without addressing Anakin or Darth Vader,” added Chow. We are then given some behind the scenes shots of McGregor at rehearsal practicing his lightsaber skills. “To have another swing at each other, might be quite satisfying for everybody,” the actor teased in closing.

    Disney+ also released a Boba Fett documentary called ‘Under the Helmet: The Legacy of Boba Fett.’ It is mostly a “history of the character” video and does not include any new footage from the upcoming series ‘The Book of Boba Fett,’ which premieres on December 29th.

    Finally, the presentation included a video from the set of the new series ‘Willow,’ which is based on the 1988 Ron Howard-directed and George Lucas-produced movie. The film’s star, Warwick Davis returns as the title character, and introduced the cast that includes Ruby Cruz (‘Mare of Easttown’), Erin Kellyman (‘The Falcon and The Winter Soldier’), and Tony Revolori (‘Spider-Man: Far From Home’). The video was done “tongue in cheek” with Davis playing a version of his arrogant ‘Life’s Too Short’ character and getting upset when the younger cast can’t remember the original film and begin to question why anyone would want a sequel series!


    PIXAR

    Unfortunately, Pixar did not have a lot to announce outside of a Cars-based animated series called ‘Cars on the Road,’ which will feature Owen Wilson and Larry the Cable Guy reprising their roles as Lightning McQueen and Mater, respectively. Other announcements from the animation company included behind the scenes documentaries for the upcoming feature films ‘Turning Red’ and ‘Lightyear,’ as well as a new series called ‘Win or Lose,’ which is an animated show that will highlight the perspectives of different characters as a middle school coed softball team prepares for their championship game.


    DISNEY STUDIOS AND NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

    On the Disney Studios side, a remake of ‘Cheaper by the Dozen’ was announced, which will star Gabrielle Union (‘Bad Boys II’) and Zach Braff (‘Oz the Great and Powerful’) and is set to premiere in March 2022. ‘Enchanted’ fans will be happy to learn that the long-awaited sequel, ‘Disenchanted’ will hit the streaming network in the fall of 2022 and once again star Amy Adams and Patrick Dempsey. It was also announced that comedians John Mulaney and Andy Samberg will star in the new live-action/CG animation film entitled ‘Chip ‘n Dale: Rescue Rangers,’ which is based on Disney’s popular chipmunk characters and will premiere in the spring of 2022.

    Director Robert Zemeckis’ ‘Pinocchio,’ based on the Disney animated classic, will bow in the fall of 2022 as well, and stars Tom Hanks, Cynthia Erivo, and Luke Evans, with the voices of Benjamin Evan Ainsworth, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Keegan-Michael Key and Lorraine Bracco. Also premiering in the fall of 2022, just in time for Halloween, is ‘Hocus Pocus 2,’ which is a sequel to the cult classic 1990’s movie. Returning stars Bette Midler, Sarah Jessica Parker and Kathy Najimy are all set to reprise their roles as the Sanderson sisters in the new sequel. A new clip from Peter Jackson’s upcoming documentary, ‘The Beatles: Get Back’ was also released featuring the legendary band performing “I Got a Feeling” in rare behind the scenes footage. The three-part documentary launches on Disney+ November 25th.

    Disney also announced a new series based on the beloved best-selling novels ‘The Spiderwick Chronicles,’ as well as animated spinoff series from some of their most popular films, including Baymax from ‘Big Hero Six,’ Tiana from ‘The Princess and the Frog,’ and’ Zootopia+,’ which opens up the world of ‘Zootopia.’ They also announced ‘The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild,’ which will star Simon Pegg as his ‘Ice Age: Collision Course’ character.

    Finally, National Geographic announced a new six-part series for 2022 called ‘Limitless’ with Chris Hemsworth. The series will follow the ‘Thor’ actor as he helps viewers discover the full potential of the human body. Nat Geo also announced a series called ‘Welcome to Earth,’ which is set to premiere on Disney+ next month. The series will be hosted by Will Smith as he encounters Earth’s greatest wonders.

  • ‘Forrest Gump’ Facts

    Tom Hanks in 'Forrest Gump'.
    Tom Hanks in ‘Forrest Gump’. Photo: Paramount Pictures.

    Starring Tom Hanks as the sweet and simple Forrest, 1994’s ‘Forrest Gump‘ captivated audiences with its emotional depth, historical integration, and unforgettable characters. Here are 15 fascinating facts about the Oscar-winning classic that even die-hard fans might not know.

    1036

    1. Tom Hanks Wasn’t Paid Up Front

    Tom Hanks believed so strongly in the film that he took a percentage of the box office earnings instead of a salary. This gamble paid off—he reportedly earned over $60 million.

    2. The Iconic Bench Scenes Were Filmed in Georgia

    Although much of the movie takes place in Alabama, the famous bench scenes were filmed in Chippewa Square, Savannah, Georgia. The bench itself now resides in the Savannah History Museum.

    3. The Running Scenes Were Filmed Across the U.S.

    Forrest’s coast-to-coast run was shot in over 20 locations, including Utah, Montana, Arizona, and the Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina.

    4. Hanks’ Brother Helped With the Running Scenes

    Tom Hanks’ younger brother, Jim Hanks, served as a body double for many of Forrest’s long-distance running scenes.

    5. “Life Is Like a Box of Chocolates” Was Voted Top Movie Quote

    The American Film Institute ranked the quote “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re gonna get” as the 40th greatest movie quote of all time.

    6. The Feather Was CGI

    The opening feather that floats through the air was a combination of real footage and digital effects—cutting-edge for its time.

    7. Haley Joel Osment Made His Film Debut

    Before ‘The Sixth Sense‘, Osment made his film debut as Forrest’s son, Forrest Jr., at just six years old.

    8. Gary Sinise’s Leg Effects Were Revolutionary

    To portray Lt. Dan without legs, Gary Sinise wore blue fabric over his lower legs, allowing the visual effects team to digitally erase them in post-production.

    9. The Vietnam Scenes Were Shot in South Carolina

    The lush Vietnam jungle wasn’t in Southeast Asia—it was actually filmed on Fripp Island and Hunting Island in South Carolina.

    10. The Script Took Years to Develop

    The screenplay, based on Winston Groom’s novel, underwent several rewrites and initially faced skepticism due to its unconventional mix of history and fiction.

    11. Hanks Modeled his Character’s Voice After the Actor that Played Young Forrest

    Michael Conner Humphreys, who played young Forrest, had a distinctive Southern accent. Hanks chose to mimic Humphreys’ speech rather than the other way around.

    12. It Beat Out Heavy Competition to Win Best Picture

    ‘Forrest Gump’ won six Academy Awards, including Best Picture, in a year that also saw ‘Pulp Fiction‘ and ‘The Shawshank Redemption‘ nominated.

    13. Elvis Presley Was Voiced by Kurt Russell

    Though uncredited, Kurt Russell provided the voice of Elvis during the early scene where Forrest teaches him to dance. Russell had previously player the character in the 1979 TV movie ‘Elvis‘, which was directed by ‘Escape from New York‘s John Carpenter.

    14. The Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. Became a Real Restaurant

    The fictional company inspired a real-life seafood restaurant chain. The first location opened in 1996 and now has multiple locations worldwide including Universal CityWalk in Los Angeles.

    15. It’s Preserved in the National Film Registry

    In 2011, the Library of Congress selected ‘Forrest Gump’ for preservation, recognizing its cultural and historical significance.

    Whether you’ve seen it once or a dozen times, ‘Forrest Gump’ continues to leave audiences laughing, crying, and reflecting on the journey of life.

    Tom Hanks in 'Forrest Gump'. Photo: Paramount Pictures.
    Tom Hanks in ‘Forrest Gump’. Photo: Paramount Pictures.
  • Every Robert Zemeckis Movie, Ranked

    Every Robert Zemeckis Movie, Ranked

    Paramount/Disney/Universal/DreamWorks

    Robert Zemeckis is one of the most exciting filmmakers working today, still. The filmmaker came of age in the 1980s with his then-writing-partner Bob Gale, working on a string of Steven Spielberg-approved projects to varying levels of success (some of the early projects fell flat until he made certain creative and commercial breakthroughs). And since that initial boom, he has continued to challenge himself (and audiences), utilizing new storytelling forms and technologies, always in the pursuit of the most exciting, emotionally resonant result. In honor of his entire body of work, we have ranked his entire filmography.

    18. ‘Welcome to Marwen’ (2018)

    Paramount

    Zemeckis’ latest film is, objectively, also his worst. Based on a sensational documentary about an artist (played by Steve Carell in this film) who, following a brutal beating, creates a fictional World War II-era in his backyard. Bafflingly, “Welcome to Marwen” turns a third act twist in the documentary that Mark Hogancamp (Carell) was targeted because he had a fetish for women’s clothing, into something that is revealed in the opening scene. Zemeckis, working at the top of his game as a craftsman, conjures Mark’s imaginary world, populated with doll equivalents of the women in his life, using cutting edge motion capture technology. But tonally “Welcome to Marwen” is all over the map, toggling uneasily between tragic drama and WTF-worthy fantasy (spoiler alert: there’s a witch). The only consistency is that both sides of the movie feel horribly inauthentic. Also, there’s a bizarre series of “Back to the Future” references that come off as just sad.

    17. ‘Flight’ (2012)

    Paramount

    After spending years in the wilds of performance capture animation, Zemeckis returned to live action with this overwrought drama, but it failed to connect on a visceral or emotional level. Denzel Washington plays a drunk, druggy commercial pilot who becomes an unwitting hero after a near-miss crash (and falls under increasing public scrutiny). Washington is terrific (as always), garnering a much-deserved Oscar nomination, and Zemeckis manages to eke out one dazzling sequence (the place crash, which includes a moment when Washington flies the plane upside down) but ultimately the entire movie crumbles under the weight of the cliché-riddled screenplay by John Gatins (also, bafflingly, Oscar-nominated) and some of the worst, most on-the-nose soundtrack choices in recent memory. “Flight” could have been great; it’s not.

    16. ‘The Walk’ (2015)

    Sony

    Part of what makes “The Walk” such a bland spectacle (even if you, like me, saw it in IMAX 3D), was that the story was already told just a few years prior in the much, much better “Man on Wire.” Sure, the actual walk between the Twin Towers (and the heist-like preamble) is breathlessly orchestrated in ways that only Zemeckis could, but everything else about the movie, from Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s cringe-worthy performance as whimsical French aerialist Philippe Petit to the maudlin romance that serves as the movie’s “heart,” falls hopelessly flat. Sigh.

    15. ‘Back to the Future Part III’ (1990)

    Universal

    Easily the weakest entry in the “Back to the Future” franchise, “Back to the Future, Part III,” released back-to-back with the sequel (it was teased at the end of “II” in a way that predates the Marvel post-credits scene), suffers greatly from the lack of involvement from Crispin Glover and from its own misplaced earnestness. Whereas the sequel had a prankster’s mischievousness about it, upending not only the rules of time travel but also the traditions of a Hollywood sequel, the third film is more or less a straightforward western with some nifty modern wraparounds. (His 1950s “western” costume is the best. The little atomic symbols are terrific.) But even an anachronistic appearance by ZZ Top doesn’t do much to elevate this well-intentioned bore.

    14. ‘A Christmas Carol’ (2009)

    Disney

    Teaming with Jim Carrey for a motion-capture retelling of the Charles Dickens yuletide classic probably seemed like a no-brainer for Zemeckis and Disney, who probably saw it as the chance to add a potential holiday favorite to the cultural lexicon, updating a beloved tale with cutting-edge technology. (A major talking point when the movie was opening was that it was Zemeckis’ return to the time travel story, which is sort of true.) But “A Christmas Carol” was a financial disappointment and a critical non-starter and led, ultimately, to Zemeckis and his ImageMovers enterprise getting booted from Disney. And it’s a shame, too, not only because of what Zemeckis had planned (a remake of The Beatles’ “Yellow Submarine” and a giant robot movie), but because “A Christmas Carol” is actually something of an achievement, a nifty, whirligig fable anchored by Carrey playing a whole squadron of characters. It’s absolutely gorgeous, too, and so fun to watch Zemeckis load up the original story with his characteristic set pieces.

    13. ‘Beowulf’ (2007)

    Paramount

    The finest film in the slate of motion capture provocations, “Beowulf,” based on the ancient tale, is the kind of heady, muscular filmmaking that only Zemeckis is capable of, but amped up to the nth degree thanks to the breakthroughs in computer technology and his never-ceasing “camera,” able to go places that a physical camera never could. Ray Winstone delivers the performance capture for the titular character, a warrior called upon to aid a village that’s being threatened by a marauding monster (Crispin Glover, collaborating once again with Zemeckis after the contentious fallout surrounding the “Back to the Future” sequels). The script by legendary fantasy author Neil Gaiman and “Pulp Fiction” writer Roger Avary deepens themes and creates plenty of space for Zemeckis to really cut loose. Originally, an NC-17-rated version was going to play in IMAX theaters while the PG-13 version would run in regular houses. That never happened and while the film remains full of implied grit, it’s still a hell of a ride.

    12. ‘Cast Away’ (2000)

    Fox

    Even when you might not care for the movie, it’s hard not to appreciate the audacity of some of these things. “Cast Away” was scheduled so that Tom Hanks could spend six months away from production, losing wait and growing out his beard and hair (in the interim, Zemeckis directed another movie) to simulate the effects of being stranded on a deserted island. And honestly, looking back on the film, the production is much more interesting than the actual movie, which features another A+ Tom Hanks performance, a couple of nifty sequences (the plane crash is, of course, a Zemeckis masterclass) and … not a lot else. Oddly forgettable (except for “Wilson,” obviously), this one has its charms but fails to stack up when compared to the rest of the filmmaker’s oeuvre.

    11. ‘Back to the Future Part II’ (1989)

    Universal

    In a weird way, “Back to the Future, Part II” has become nearly as influential as the original film, mostly in the ways that it gleefully upends expected tropes in favor of making a meta-textual commentary on the role of sequels and how filmmakers are asked to just repeat everything that made the first sequel great (by going back into the same sequences). An original version of the sequel had Marty traveling back to the 1960s, when his parents were flower-children, but the fact that Crispin Glover refused to collaborate sent them on a much different path. At least two movies in 2019 have referenced the film extensively (“Happy Death Day 2U” and “Avengers: Endgame”), a testament to its continued power (another point of reference is the fact that Biff seems to have become president in our real world). While slightly diminished by the lack of Glover’s involvement, its other biggest sticking point is the decision to make Marty some kind of hair-trigger hot head. It’s the dumbest part of an otherwise ambitious and adventurous follow-up.

    10. ‘Forrest Gump’ (1994)

    Paramount

    By the time that “Forrest Gump” came out, Zemeckis had garnered plenty of commercial success but had never had a runaway critical crowd-pleaser. That all change with “Forrest Gump,” which would not only wind up as the second most successful movie of the year but also land on countless best-of lists at the end of the year and sweep the Oscars, winning Best Picture, Best Actor (Tom Hanks), Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Visual Effects, Best Editing and Best Director for Zemeckis himself. It was a sensation. Looking back on the film, it can’t help but feel a little creaky (especially in the same year that “Pulp Fiction” and “Heavenly Creatures” were released, both signaling the arrival of major talents) but technically proficient and still very moving. This is Zemeckis at his most earnest and big-hearted, two qualities that Hanks’ performance very much embodies, and it’s pretty hard to hate on that.

    9. ‘Death Becomes Her’ (1992)

    Universal

    What began as a contentious production, with confusion over tone, a lengthy screening process and untested visual effects, has wound up a cult classic, celebrated particularly in the LGBTQ community and released as a new, special-features-laden Blu-ray from Shout Factory. A dark comedy is a tough sell to mainstream audiences, especially one this dark (the original trailer utilized music from Zemeckis’ “Tales from the Crypt” HBO series), so it’s understandable that “Death Becomes Her” took a while to find its audience. Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn play a pair of women chasing the fountain of youth, until they literally find it in a mysterious vial. As the situation becomes more murderous, Zemeckis is given license to pile on the visual effects, including blowing a hole through Hawn and having Streep’s head on backwards. A wild, wonderful ride in which every performer (including a more-than-game Bruce Willis) knows exactly what movie they’re in, “Death Becomes Her” is an oddball delight.

    8. ‘What Lies Beneath’ (2000)

    DreamWorks

    Weirdly underrated, “What Lies Beneath” was the “little movie” that Zemeckis filmed in the six months Tom Hanks was growing out his beard and losing weight for the second half of “Cast Away.” The filmmaker wanted to make a Hitchcock movie but with all of the modern technological advancements (because, of course he did), although that scratches the surface of what he actually accomplished. For one, he made a tightly modulated thriller that veers from the kind of domestic, Hitchcockian tropes he was originally interested in to something far more ghoulish and supernatural. (This is the closest he’s come to recapturing his “Tales from the Crypt” magic.) He also, amazingly, subverted Harrison Ford’s movie-star image, turning him into a creepy letch (and then something even nastier), while cementing Michelle Pfieffer’s place as one of our most beloved leading ladies. Oh and the technological stuff (lots of computer-augmented camera moves and the like) is neat too.

    7. ‘Contact’ (1997)

    Warner Bros.

    It took a while for Zemeckis to settle on his follow-up to the box office-smashing, Oscar-sweeping “Forrest Gump” and when he did, it was a doozy: a long-in-the-works adaptation of scientist Carl Sagan’s lone novel “Contact” (which, in the circuitous universe of Hollywood, began as a screenplay). Some of Zemeckis’ greatest ideas and most breathless set pieces are housed within “Contact” (among them: the famous “mirror shot,” the terrorist attack on the spaceship, and the initial discovery of the message) but there are also some of his very worst inclinations on display, right alongside these breakthroughs and you can feel the sentimentality of “Forrest Gump” seeping into the hard sci-fi. (This is no more apparent than during the anticlimactic third act.) Also, Matthew McConaughey is gravely miscast as a spiritual leader and potential love interest for Jodie Foster. On what planet?

    6. ‘Allied’ (2016)

    Paramount

    Right before “Allied” was scheduled to be released, tabloid reports had stars Brad Pitt and Marion Cotillard carrying on a very real affair. But even that kind of creepy curiosity wasn’t enough to make the film a hit, which is a shame because it’s one of the director’s very best, most mature works, a World War II-set thriller that actually thrills. Pitt is a Canadian spy who starts working with Cotillard’s French Resistance fighter, eventually falling in love with her, before uncovering intelligence that she might be working for the other side. As Pitt struggles to figure out the truth, you can feel the noose tightening, and in many ways the film feels like one of Zemeckis’ patented set pieces but sustained over much of the 124-minute runtime. (Steven Knight’s script is terrific.) It’s a brilliant film, full of nuanced performances and edge-of-your-seat thrills. Eventually people will rediscover it and say, “Where has this been?”

    5. ‘Romancing the Stone’ (1984)

    Fox

    The legacy of “Romancing the Stone” can be felt in the number of modern action adventures that attempt to replicate that film’s tone and style but end up failing horribly. Because it really is something; there’s alchemy on display, a kind of lightning-in-a-bottle electricity, that has yet to be duplicated (even by its Zemeckis-less sequel, “Jewel of the Nile”). Kathleen Turner (who would go on to voice Jessica Rabbit), as a spirited novelist, and Michael Douglas, as a shady smuggler, are a dynamic duo, and their bickering, flirtatious banter felt both classically old school Hollywood as well as hopelessly modern. This movie has real gusto, and Zemeckis treats the comedy just as seriously as the action sequences, staging each moment with his typical meticulous attention to detail and the way that, whether it’s a set piece or a punchline, the moments can build and grow in complexity. More importantly, “Romancing the Stone” would end Zemeckis’ cold-streak and set up him for an unprecedented run of critical and commercial darlings.

    4. ‘Used Cars’ (1980)

    Columbia

    One of Zemeckis’ earliest projects and also one of his best, “Used Cars” is a gonzo, sometimes incredibly dark comedy that the director mounted after his flashy (and ultimately disastrous) writing gig on Steven Spielberg’s doomed farce “1941.” Kurt Russell, at the height of his 1980s, post-Disney charm offensive, plays a handsome dingus working at a ragtag car dealership competing against a much slicker lot across the street from them. As you can imagine, things get wild. At the time of the movie’s release, the humor felt too dark and esoteric for mainstream success, and you can feel that his early setbacks might have curdled the screenplay to a degree (the script was credited to Zemeckis and his longtime partner Bob Gale). But over the years it has garnered the appreciation it rightfully deserves. (Earlier this year a Blu-ray was released by Shout Factory.) No matter the price, “Used Cars” is worth picking up.

    3. ‘I Wanna Hold Your Hand’ (1978)

    Universal

    Zemeckis and Gale’s very first film remains a charming time capsule, cheery and manic in equal measure. “I Want to Hold Your Hand” follows a group of young girls (including a wonderful Nancy Allen) travel from New Jersey to New York City to try and get a glimpse of the Beatles as they perform on “The Ed Sullivan Show.” Of course, anything that can go wrong does go wrong, and the amount of mishaps and misadventures start to pile up. For his very first feature, under the mentorship of executive producer Steven Spielberg, Zemeckis shows a remarkable amount of confidence and talent, as he goes about layering in the humor and interpersonal drama alongside the big, calamitous set pieces that would go on to become part of his directorial signature. Despite strong word-of-mouth the movie never found its audience, although it was recently inducted into the Criterion Collection, cementing it as the classic we already knew that it was.

    2. ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’ (1988)

    Disney

    Who Framed Roger Rabbit” is Robert Zemeckis working at the top of his game, marrying technological advancements with a superb story for a film that is nothing short of a masterpiece. Mind-boggling in its complexity and aided considerably, at least when it came to licensing characters from competing studios, by the involvement of executive producer Steven Spielberg, “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” is one of those movies they just don’t make anymore, a film with endless franchise potential that wound up being just one film and one that didn’t take its audience’s sophistication for granted. (It featured cartoon characters and was the best film noir this side of “Chinatown.”) Taking place in a golden age Hollywood where humans exist alongside animated characters, it’s anchored by a wonderful performance by Bob Hoskins (in a role Harrison Ford priced himself out of) and filled with rich animation from Richard Williams (at the time Disney animation was in such bad shape they only contributed minimally). It’s still mind-blowing.

    1. ‘Back to the Future’ (1985)

    Universal

    After a string of critical and commercial disappointments, despite the mentorship of Steven Spielberg, Zemeckis made “Romancing the Stone,” a genuine smash but one that was his first “for hire” gig. Undeterred by his early failures, Zemeckis returned to an original concept, once again backed by Spielberg, with “Back to the Future,” a film that was made quickly and cheaply and ended up as a zeitgeist-capturing instant classic. Everything about this movie is noteperfect, from the casting of Michael J. Fox (who replaced Eric Stoltz after several uneasy weeks of filming) and Christopher Lloyd, to the subtle visual effects from Industrial Light & Magic, to Alan Silvestri’s twinkly score. For an entire generation of film fanatics, even the opening moments of the film, with the ticking of a thousand clocks, is enough for nostalgic transportation back to 1985. It’s a testament to the film’s power and singular spirit that it is still being referenced, recited and ripped off all these years later (sometimes by Zemeckis himself – see: “Welcome to Marwen”).

  • ‘Welcome to Marwen’ Director Robert Zemeckis On Why Toon Town Makes Him Nervous

    ‘Welcome to Marwen’ Director Robert Zemeckis On Why Toon Town Makes Him Nervous

    Universal

    Sometimes just saying a filmmaker’s name can conjure up the mood and atmosphere of their entire oeuvre. This is the case with Robert Zemeckis, who has delighted the world with endless invention and innovation over the course of his career and whose movies feel, more often than not, exciting, scary and fun, but always deeply emotional and resonant. You care about the characters, no matter what oversized scenario Zemeckis has invented for them to tumble around in. He is a treasure and every one of his movies should be treasured; they’re as polished, beautiful and intricate as any jewel.

    His latest jewel is “Welcome to Marwen,” a based-on-a-true-story fantasy adventure about a man (Steve Carell) who, after a violent beating, copes by making a tiny miniature village behind his home, populated by versions of the people in his own town. Given that this is a Zemeckis movie, and as a filmmaker who never shies away from cutting-edge technology, the dolls themselves are brought to life via motion-capture performances, done by all the same actors and actresses (Leslie Mann, Janelle Monae, Eiza Gonzalez). The entire thing conjures up a world that only Zemeckis could create, both earthbound and emotional and still fantastically out-there at the same time.

    Our conversation darted around all over the pace, from the Zemeckis shout-outs included in “Ready Player One” to his failed motion-capture “Yellow Submarine” remake, and to maintain that goofy spirit, it is included below.

    WB/Amblin

    Wanted to ask first about “Ready Player One,” which had so many references to your films. What was your reaction?

    I thought it was very nice. It was a great tribute. It was really fun.

    Did you and Spielberg chat about it beforehand?

    Yeah, he told me what was going on. We chatted a little bit. But I think all of that was in the book.

    This can be applied to your entire career and certainly to “Welcome to Marwen,” but when choosing projects, how much are you drawn to the story and how much are you drawn to some crazy technological hurdle that you’re looking to overcome?

    Well, I think it’s usually a blend of both. But I think it’s always the human emotional story first. Because that’s the only way I know how to make the movie. And then I do honestly ask myself the question, So how can we do this in a way that has never been seen before? How can we make this a reason to go to the movies, to present a story that should be done as a work of cinema? And tell the story as cinematically as we possibly can.

    You haven’t used performance-capture this extensively since you stopped making completely performance-capture movies. Was it fun to integrate the disciplines?

    Yeah it was. There was a lot of performance-capture in “The Walk” but you didn’t know it.

    Really?
    Oh yeah. But yes … the answer to the question is yes.

    Now I want to know about the performance-capture in “The Walk!”

    No, it’s okay. There are always things happening all over the place these days.

    It was interesting to read the press notes and learn that you were going to build the entire town.

    Well, yeah, we went through every process. We did our due diligence to figure out what would be the way. The key thing that we wanted to do was that we never wanted to lose the power of the human performance, translating it to the doll. So we tested everything and ran through every conceivable idea. Then we landed on what we’ll call “enhanced performance-capture,” and we tested it a lot to make sure it could deliver, before we ever stepped on the set.

    Your last few movies have either been based on real events or been set in a historical framework. Is that a response to getting out of animation and dealing with actors? Or where does that inclination come from?

    I don’t know. I don’t think about it consciously. I did read a quote from Francois Truffaut who said, “Every filmmaker’s decision to make a film is a reaction to the film they just made.” So whatever that means! It might be something to do with that.

    Disney

    This is 30 years after you made “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,” but there’s still the same mixture of live-action and animated elements.

    A little bit.

    What has changed the most?

    Oh god everything is easier. Every frame of “Roger Rabbit” was drawn by hand. Anybody can do “Roger Rabbit” now since we have computers. But that was backbreaking work back then.

    Do you ever want to return to that world?

    Well, look, there’s a really good script at Disney for a sequel but I don’t think it’s on their agenda. There are no princesses in it. [laughs]

    Roger Rabbit was in the parks for a long time.

    Well, we still have Toon Town.

    That’s true. Do you ever go on the ride?

    The Roger Rabbit ride? The Car Toon Spin? Oh yeah of course. I like it. I think Toon Town is kind of cool. You know what I like about Toon Town?

    What?

    It makes you nervous. When you’re in Toon Town, I get anxious, because it’s kind of nuts. I think they really captured the thing that was the essence of Toon Town from the movie. It’s almost like, at certain points, you say, “I’ve got to get out of here.”

    Speaking of Disney, I’m mildly obsessed with your proposed “Yellow Submarine” motion-capture remake. Can you talk about what that was going to be?

    It was going to be a dimensionalized 3D remake of the original movie, with massive improvements to the story, with a lot of effort made to bring the characters of the Beatles into the story as best we could.

    Are you still looking to do more performance-capture movies?

    Again, I don’t look to do movies based on a technological thing. If a story comes along that it works with, like “Marwen,” then good. But I’m not out there going, “I’ve got to get me a performance-capture movie!” No way.

    One of my favorites of your performance-capture work is “Beowulf.” And I’d heard you wanted to do a PG-13 version for regular cinemas and NC-17 for IMAX. Is that true, at all?

    I floated the question about … It wasn’t NC-17 but it was unrated … So I said, “Why can’t we, since we’re going to be on a limited number of screens and people have to pay a premium to play IMAX, just try that?” And I’ve asked that a couple of times. And they always say no, it gets too complicated, they can’t do that, somebody will walk into the wrong theater and write a letter to the MPAA and they didn’t want to deal with that. But now it doesn’t matter anymore because the only time the ratings of movies matter is in movie theaters. Everything that’s being streamed is unrated. Anybody can watch anything.

    You’re in the unique position of having a big movie opening in a bunch of screens nationwide and having a hit show on television at the same time (“Manifest”). There’s this big debate about where people should see movies and how they should see them and wanted to see where you fell in?

    I’ve kind of given up on it the debate, because everything is becoming this giant stew. I don’t think anybody knows what’s going on. It’s a free-ball. I personally love the cinema. I love the cinema experience. I love audiences collectively experiencing something. I love the idea like in the movie “Jaws,” when Roy Scheider steps into water that’s inside the boat, when the shark is attacking, that the audience screams even though there’s no possible way the shark is in that boat. Audiences who see the movie in isolation don’t get to experience that. So just the idea that the collective audience experience is something that I personally like and I make my movies like that and then if you see it on your phone, you see it on your phone.

    I just have to ask this question, because it’s so weird: there’s a deleted scene/outtake on the “Back to the Future” box set where Michael J. Fox does an entire scene as a cholo. Do you remember this?

    Yes I do.

    Why did he do that?

    He was just goofing and we rolled the camera. He just showed up one day and wanted to do that. He just walked in that day and started that, and I said, “Hey, roll.”

    “Welcome to Marwen” is everywhere this Friday.

  • Exclusive: See the Brand-New Character Posters for Robert Zemeckis’ ‘Welcome to Marwen’

    Exclusive: See the Brand-New Character Posters for Robert Zemeckis’ ‘Welcome to Marwen’

    Universal/ImageMovers

    Robert Zemeckis is the type of filmmaker known for grafting fantastical scenarios with utterly relatable characters. Just think about “Back to the Future,” “Forrest Gump,” “Contact” or “Cast Away” — these are movies in which the high concept doesn’t dilute the emotionality of the pieces, it amplifies them.

    Zemeckis’ latest combination of the down-to-earth and the otherworldly is “Melcome to Marwen,” the true-life story of a man (Steve Carell) who, following a violent attack, recreates a World War II village in his backyard, populating it with dolls that look like the people in his town (Leslie Mann, Diane Kruger, Janelle Monae, and Eiza Gonzalez). It looks totally enchanting and very, very Zemeckis-y. And we are so thrilled to debut the brand new character posters, ahead of tomorrow’s brand new trailer.

    The posters feature the doll versions of the aforementioned actresses (along with characters played by Gwendoline Christie, Merritt Wever and Zemeckis’ wife, Leslie Zemeckis), along with Carrell’s .

    “Welcome to Marwen” opens everywhere on December 21, 2018.

    Universal/ImaveMovers
  • 9 Things You Never Knew About ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’

    It shouldn’t have worked. Nobody thought it would work. But, 30 years ago, “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” bounded into theaters and dazzled audiences worldwide with its inventive storytelling, then-next-generation technology, and endearing characters.

    It was a live action/animation hybrid long before motion capture became the norm, and featured a nifty conspiracy plot that sometimes is arguably better than “Chinatown.” It’s just a movie that is so clever, so fun, so relentlessly entertaining, that it’s hard to believe it hasn’t been turned into some endless franchise. (Those short films are great, though.) So, on its 30th anniversary, we thought we’d look back at “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” with nine things you might not know about Robert Zemeckis‘ masterpiece.

    1. It Took a L-O-N-G Time to Get to the Big Screen

    When something like “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” comes out, it feels like an instant classic; like it had just been a part of the universe for as long as movies were made. But, in truth, the movie was a long slog and faced a number of seemingly insurmountable challenges on the way to the big screen.

    The rights to Gary Wolf’s “Who Censored Roger Rabbit?” were purchased in 1981 by embattled Disney president Ron Miller. Work began on a screenplay while Darrell Van Citters produced an intriguing animation/live-action test that featured Paul Reubens as the voice of Roger (his design was noticeably different, but he still wore those red overalls) and Peter Renaday as Eddie Valiant. Also notable about these early tests: the inclusion of an animated detective named Cleaver, who warns Valiant to remove himself from the case. There was even promotional footage meant to drum up interest in the project that named Van Citters as the animation director, with Mike Giaimo as the character designer and “story man” (he’s still at Disney!), and producer Marc Sturdivant as the producer. While the pitch has the basic structure of the eventual movie (by this point, screenwriters Peter Seaman and Jeffrey Price had already submitted at least one draft), from a design point — it couldn’t be further from the final film.2. Everything Changed

    Director Robert Zemeckis had expressed interest in the project as early as 1982, but Disney was hesitant, since his last two features (“I Wanna Hold Your Hand” and “Used Cars“) had, despite the creative backing of Steven Spielberg, disappointed at the box office.

    When Michael Eisner, Frank Wells, and Jeffrey Katzenberg assumed control at the studio in the mid-1980s, the project was jump-started again. Katzenberg brought in Steven Spielberg and his producing partners Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy. According to James B. Stewart’s “Disney War,” Katzenberg saw this as an opportunity to reinvigorate the Disney animation legacy. Only, once Spielberg was on board, installing Zemeckis in the director’s chair and agreeing to a $29.9 million budget (down from the desired $50 million budget, which the movie ended up costing after some overruns and technical setbacks), he shied away from actually using Disney talent.

    Disney reportedly lobbied for the production to use Van Citters, but Zemeckis and Spielberg refused, instead choosing Richard Williams, who Zemeckis considered “the best animator in the world.” Williams’ early test, with a fully dimensional Roger and a swooping camera move, made the selection easy: he was clearly the guy.

    3. You Can Spot an Early Version of Roger In a Goofy Short

    During the time that testing was being done on “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,” an animated Disney special was being produced that would eventually air on NBC on May 27, 1987. Entitled “Sport Goofy in Soccermania,” it was structured like a sports documentary, looking back on Goofy’s sports-related foul-ups and advancing a story involving Scrooge, his nephews, and all sorts of madcap nuttiness. The special was written by Tad Stones (future creator of “Darkwing Duck”) and Joe Ranft (who would go on to become an ace Pixar story artist) and co-directed by Van Citters (it would ultimately be his last project at Disney). When the special cuts away to the stands, look for the red overalls — that’s the original version of Roger hooting, hollering, and clapping in the audience.

    4. Spielberg Secured All the Rights to the Characters

    As noted in “Disney War,” Spielberg and Katzenberg were awarded full creative control on the project (which included final cut and a 50 percent rights to box-office receipts, licensing, merchandise, theme park attractions and anything else; a joint copyright would appear on the film, split between Spielberg’s Amblin and Disney), a rare move for a studio as protective and controlling as Disney. Still, for their trouble, they got Spielberg, whose status as the king of the box office and his genial disposition, allowed him to secure characters from Warner Bros, Fleischer Studios, King Features Syndicate, Felix the Cat Productions, Turner, and Universal.

    Some of these characters came with stipulations, down to the number of words each character says (as was the case with Mickey and Bugs Bunny and Donald and Daffy), but — generally — the creative team was able to use them as the production saw fit. What’s even more shocking than securing all of those characters was the fee Spielberg negotiated: a mere $5,000 per character. Incredible.

    5. Not That They Got Everybody

    There are a few omissions that might have you scratching your head; in particular the lack of Tom and Jerry, Popeye, and Casper the Friendly Ghost. As is recounted on the DVD commentary track, these were a few of the characters who they were unable to license for the film. They tried! But they just couldn’t secure a deal for them.

    6. It Was Too Naughty for Disney

    While we commonly think of “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” as a Disney film, it wasn’t actually released under the Disney banner. Instead, it was technically a Touchstone film, released under the division of Disney that handled more “all audiences” or “adult” fare (things like “Splash” and “Pretty Woman“).

    Supposedly, the decision to make it a Touchstone film came after an early test screening when Roy Disney cornered Michael Eisner in the parking lot. According to “Disney War,” Roy warned Eisner that, “This is too risqué for the Disney banner.” When Eisner asked why, Roy said, “You know, Jessica’s line, ‘Is that a gun in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?’” Eisner agreed and thought the Touchstone label would mean a boost for older audiences, since it shook free the kiddie association of the Disney name. In his autobiography, Eisner said that he considered the film too “sophisticated and sexy.”7. Roger Rabbit Was Everywhere in the Parks

    “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” opened in the summer of 1988 and, by the fall, there was a walk-around Roger character appearing in Disneyland. Roger Rabbit also appeared as a giant 45-foot-tall inflatable balloon as part of the “Party Gras” parade at Disneyland, from January to November 1990 (celebrating Disneyland’s 35th anniversary). In 1991, Roger was also the conductor for the SpectroMagic nighttime parade at Walt Disney World, and preliminary plans were drawn up to insert an area behind Main Street U.S.A. at Disneyland for Roger and his friends. (In 1991, the project was canceled, according to a Los Angeles Times report, because the company was instead focusing on its Westcot project.)

    An expansion of what was then known as Disney-MGM Studios was also proposed, as Roger had been a staple of the park since it opened, with a section of the backlot tour devoted to the climax of the film and Roger’s handprints being visible in front of the Great Movie Ride. A whole area of the park seemed like a no-brainer, and some ambitious projects — including the Toontown Trolley, a kind of next-generation 360 version of Star Tour — a bar and restaurant themed after the movie’s Terminal Bar, and a classic dark ride called Baby Herman’s Runaway Baby Buggy. (According to the New York Times, “this [land in the park] will be a kind of Toontown, where — as in the movie — only cartoon characters may live.”)

    There was a Jessica Rabbit-themed store on Pleasure Island, Disney’s adults-only dining and entertainment district, from 1990 to 1992. Most staggeringly, Disney Feature Animation Florida, housed on property at the park, produced two Roger Rabbit shorts — “Roller Coaster Rabbit” and “Trail Mix-Up.” The only honest-to-goodness Roger Rabbit attraction opened at Disneyland in 1994 (and Tokyo Disneyland in 1996) as Roger Rabbit’s Car Toon Spin. And it’s a miracle that one made it into the world.

    8. Spielberg Eventually Soured on the Character

    Since Spielberg held a co-copyright on the character, and got a percentage of all the grosses from everything Roger Rabbit-related, he had a say on everything. While there were literally hundreds of items (and even more tie-ins) produced in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Eisner and the rest of the Disney team assumed that Spielberg would just approve it all and not put up much of a fight. When it came to “Roller Coaster Rabbit,” the Roger Rabbit short produced at Disney’s Florida animation studio, Spielberg wanted it to appear on his new film for Disney, “Arachnophobia.” Like “Who Framed Roger Rabbit,” this spider-movie, billed as a “thrillomedy” (a “thriller comedy” in early ’90s marketing speak), would be released by another Disney imprint, Hollywood Pictures. (It was the first film to be released by Hollywood, actually!)

    Eisner saw it differently.

    At the time, the studio was hemorrhaging money on Warren Beatty’s ambitious “Dick Tracy” adaptation and wanted to put the short on that film instead, helping to insure that it was a hit. Spielberg, to put it lightly, was pissed. Plans for an additional short, “Hare in My Soup,” to be attached to “The Rocketeer” the following summer, were scuttled, even though pre-production had been completed. By 1992, Eisner had issued an edict that Roger would no longer be a part of the parks and (most) projects involving the character were to be shut down. The most prominent use of the character these days is the giant Roger Rabbit statue at Disney’s Pop Century Resort. He’s in the 1980s section of the resort, next to the oversized Walkman and Rubik’s Cube. What an inglorious end to such a beloved character.9. Sequels Were Developed

    When Spielberg shut down production on that Roger Rabbit short, he also squashed a proposed sequel, which had Roger facing off against Nazis.

    Since he had started work on the Oscar-winning “Schindler’s List,” Spielberg made an edict that Nazis wouldn’t be used as comical villains in any of his future projects. (This included various incarnations of the fourth Indiana Jones film, which up until the Frank Darabont script, “Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods,” featured Nazis hiding in the South American jungle.) There were a number of attempts at a proper “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” follow-up, including a prequel entitled “Who Discovered Roger Rabbit” that was set during Roger’s Broadway days and had new songs by Alan Menken; a script that featured a showdown between famous animated heroes and villains at an unfinished Disneyland (they were considering filming at the then-under-construction EuroDisney project); and a version that had a fully three-dimensional Roger interacting alongside human costars.

    In 1998, legendary Disney animator Eric Goldberg completed a ten second test for the fully CGI Roger. What’s especially remarkable about the test is that it doesn’t feel overtly computer-generated; he might have gained some extra dimensionality, but that’s the Roger we know and love.

    Every once in a while, Zemeckis will talk about returning to Toon Town but, as of now, no concrete has been poured …

  • Robert Zemeckis Set for New Roald Dahl’s ‘The Witches’ Movie Adaptation

    Move over, Anjelica Huston‘s “The Witches.” Roald Dahl’s dark fantasy novel is casting another spell on the big screen.

    According to Variety, Robert Zemeckis is in final negotiations to direct “The Witches,” with this version said to be more rooted in the original source material than the 1990 film’s loose adaptation.

    Zemeckis (“Back to the Future,” “Death Becomes Her”) is also writing the script, Variety reports. He’s producing with ImageMovers partner Jack Rapke, along with — talk about a strong fantasy/horror pedigree right out of the gate! — Best Director Oscar winners Alfonso Cuaron (“Gravity”) and Guillermo del Toro (“The Shape of Water”). Guillermo del Toro had once planned to direct but dropped out from a scheduling conflict.

    Here’s the general description for “The Witches,” which was published in 1983 by the author of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” and “The BFG”:

    “This is not a fairy tale. This is about real witches.

    Grandmamma loves to tell about witches. Real witches are the most dangerous of all living creatures on earth. There’s nothing they hate so much as children, and they work all kinds of terrifying spells to get rid of them. Her grandson listens closely to Grandmamma’s stories—but nothing can prepare him for the day he comes face-to-face with The Grand High Witch herself!”

    Anjelica Huston played the Grand High Witch in the 1990 movie.

    Stay tuned for updates on this new film’s casting and the theatrical release date.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘The Flash’ Movie Appears to Have Three Finalists to Direct

    DC’s “The Flash” movie is reportedly down to its top three director choices, so the time has come for them … to lip sync for their lives. That would be our (and RuPaul’s) preferred method to pick a winner, but Warner Bros. may go a more traditional route. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the long-suffering movie, which already lost two previous directors, is now down to this shortlist:

    • Robert Zemeckis
    • Matthew Vaughn
    • Sam Raimi

    THR added that official offers have yet to be delivered to any of them, but they have all met with the studio in recent weeks and are all considered strong contenders.

    Seth Grahame-Smith was the first director to leave “The Flash,” after writing a script he was slated to direct. Then “Dope” director Rick Famuyiwa left over creative differences. Rumor has it that “Back to the Future” and “Forrest Gump” director Robert Zemeckis is now the frontrunner, over “Kick-Ass” and “X-Men: First Class” director Matthew Vaughn and “Spider-Man” and “Evil Dead” director Sam Raimi. But we’ll see.

    A few months ago, Barry Allen/The Flash actor Ezra Miller talked to Collider about all of the directors and potential directors coming and going:

    “For me, it’s sort of a tragic relay race, and we’ve had a couple really incredible people carry this baton, and their marks are left on that baton, and the work that they’ve given to the project will certainly be represented in whatever the final product comes to be.”

    The movie previously had a March 2018 release date, but that got pushed back. Still, Warner Bros. had better settle on someone fast. As one THR commenter suggested: “Let’s just do a Flash Hunger Games. Winner directs it. May the odds be ever in your favor.”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • The 11 Best Steven Spielberg-Produced Movies

    %Slideshow-330238%
    Would we have “Back to the Future” without Steven Spielberg?

    Without his mentorship of director Robert Zemeckis, there’s a very possible alternate reality where Marty McFly never got in that DeLorean.

    Since becoming one of the most successful filmmakers in Hollywood with “Jaws,” Spielberg has helped greenlight dozens of movies just by signing on as a producer.

    He’s been instrumental in talking talent into projects (like the “Men in Black” stars), giving expert advice, and shepherding movies that might never have gotten made, like Clint Eastwood’s “Letters From Iwo Jima” and the films funded by his Shoah Foundation.

    Here are some of his best “producer only” movies.

    Back to the Future 30th Anniversary Trilogy” is available to own now on Blu-ray & DVD.

  • 10 Best Robert Zemeckis Movies, Ranked

    %Slideshow-335925%
    ​The 30th anniversary of “Back to the Future” suggests the question: Is director Robert Zemeckis more Marty McFly or more Doc Brown?

    Like both characters, he’s all about solving puzzles. The characters in his movies almost always have tricky problems that require complex solutions. Like Doc, Zemeckis often finds cutting-edge technical solutions for the special effects challenges of his own storytelling, from the early CGI on “Back to the Future Part II” and “Forrest Gump” to the motion-capture animation of many of his recent films. And like Marty, he finds a way to make those complicated solutions relatable to everyone.

    The result has been a four-decade career full of populist blockbusters that also awe critics. Here are the must-see movies that define that career.

    Back to the Future 30th Anniversary Trilogy” is available to own now on Blu-ray & DVD.