Tag: oscars 2018

  • ‘Roma’ Review: Alfonso Cuarón’s Latest Masterpiece Is Truly Special

    ‘Roma’ Review: Alfonso Cuarón’s Latest Masterpiece Is Truly Special

    Netflix

    As a director, writer, producer — and sometimes documentarian — Alfonso Cuarón seems like he’s been a fixture of the cinema for years. Indeed, it’s surprising to realize he’s only directed eight films since his 1991 debut, “Solo con Tu Pareja.” This is possibly because his last three –“Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” “Children of Men,” and “Gravity” — all in one way or another became an immediate part of the pop culture firmament, earning accolades or box office glory or supplying the world with a prescient look at humanity, technology, and the magic in between — the magic of creation, if nothing else.

    But even for a constant inventor and fearless experimenter, his latest, “Roma,” is something special, something unique — an intimate, even sometimes slight drama given poetry and emotional resonance as it’s projected against the backdrop of not just Mexican history, but his own. Shot in black and white, starring a nonprofessional actress, and set in a time and place seldom explored in mainstream cinema — that is, until a filmmaker like Cuarón has the personal investment, and perhaps more importantly, the authority to shine a light upon it — “Roma” tells a deeply humane, enchanting story that easily ranks among the best and most indelible of 2018.

    Newcomer Yalitza Aparicio plays Cleo, a young maid in the household of a middle-class family living in Mexico City in the early 1970s. Obedient and sensitive, Cleo forms natural attachments with her employers Sofia (Marina de Tavira) and Antonio (Fernando Grediaga), not to mention their three children — and they with her. But the growing strain between Sofia and Antonio serves as a reminder that she should keep their family at arm’s length, at least until she becomes pregnant by Fermin (Jorge Antonio Guerrero), the cousin of her friend Adela’s (Nancy Garcia) boyfriend, Pepe (Marco Graf).

    After Antonio leaves, Cleo grows closer to the children, as Sofia attempts to figure out how to explain to them that their parents are getting divorced. But when Fermin abandons Cleo and leaves her to give birth alone, they are forced to come together to make the best of their respective situations.

    Cuarón’s film was reportedly inspired by his own upbringing, and as homage or recreation (or both), he chronicles these characters’ lives in ways that bring them vividly to life. Cleo’s tasks are menial and domestic, but they give her purpose, and make her feel a sense of belonging — except when Sofia reminds her that she is an employee, which happens occasionally, but never cruelly. It’s a distinction that blurs ever more dimly as both she and their family face adversity. First, it is when she fearfully reveals her pregnancy to Sofia, then later when Sofia invites her on a vacation with the children where she hopes to come clean about their father. Cuaron’s camera observes affectionately how these women band together in the face of unhelpful, indifferent men, and care for children, and each other, indicting their counterparts irrefutably but dispassionately.

    The filmmaker also serves as his own cinematographer, astutely capturing both the routine of their lives and the details that seem at once mundane and magical. From the dog turds that never seem to wash away, to the carport where Antonio’s prized Galaxy will barely fit, his portrait feels both aspirational and delicately anchored in reality; planes fly distantly over the rooftops where maids across the city hang laundry. Weddings take place in the background as sad conversations unfold. As a New Year’s party gets underway, a fire breaks out in the hills beyond the hacienda grounds, and the partygoers, including the children, venture out to help smother the brush fires. The rhythms are those of real life, combining tragedy and triumph and coincidence and convergence with honesty and compassion, elevating it all to something more profound than the “mere” stuff of a maid bonding with the family she works for.

    Aparicio is both the film’s tether to a documentary-style reality about the lives of maids in a middle-class Mexico City borough and its light source, its force for elevating the premise to something more meaningful. What happens to her, and to the family, is never pitying, and neither does it indulge in anachronistic clichés; these women have grander, or at the very least more honest dreams for their future, and part of this adventure involves them coming to terms with that. And it all goes back to Cuaron’s great gifts as a filmmaker, presented through his work time and again: To take worlds we think we know, or we feel we can imagine, and to immerse us in them, make them feel visceral, and to give that emotional dimension.

    Ultimately, “Roma” aims for something so specific that it cannot help but feel universal. In doing so, it humanizes experiences that it seems easy to have distant, detached opinions about, and then elevating that humanity into the stuff of great art. In the end, it achieves something unique, relatable, and transcendent all at once.

  • ‘A Star Is Born’ Review: Bradley Cooper, Lady Gaga Deliver One of 2018’s Best Movies

    ‘A Star Is Born’ Review: Bradley Cooper, Lady Gaga Deliver One of 2018’s Best Movies

    WB

    There’s an interesting quandary at the center of “A Star Is Born,” or at least in the latest interpretation of this classic Hollywood yarn: Who do we relate to, identify with, in this story of star-crossed career paths — the impressionable young ingenue, or the seasoned veteran?

    Bradley Cooper’s directorial debut makes a convincing case for both, thanks not only to music that bolsters the credibility of both rugged singer-songwriter Jackson Maine (Cooper) and aspiring pop star Ally (Lady Gaga), but motivations that seem to exist both within the actors performing them, and the careers those performers have developed for themselves outside the actual narrative. Either way, Cooper’s film is a remarkable, addictive piece of Hollywood myth-making that deserves to be seen on the biggest screen and in the loudest theater possible.

    Cooper (“American Sniper”) plays Jackson, a grizzled musician with as many poetic insights about art as he does addictions. One night after a gig, he wanders into a drag bar for a cocktail where he stumbles across Ally (Gaga), a waitress who’s all but given up on the possibility of stardom outside of singing “La Vie En Rose” for the local queens. He takes an immediate shine to her — and her talent — and the two quickly slide into a tender courtship, him pulling her onstage to sing duets in front of thousands of fans, and her pulling him into bed, and later, the studio to collaborate. Despite Ally’s insistence she won’t enable his addictions, his self-destructive behavior continues to guide his life and derail his career, even as she finds a manager (Rafi Gavron, “Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist”) and acquiesces to the demands of pop stardom –to enormous success, but at the expense of a few of the qualities Jackson first fell in love with.

    But as their personal and professional relationships fall into relief with one another, they’re forced to reflect on the time they have shared, and make some difficult decisions about what sort of future each wants — both as musicians and as lovers.

    WB

    It sounds like a criticism to say that there aren’t many surprises in “A Star Is Born,” but the familiarity of this particular kind of love story — with or without that title — practically demands a boilerplate approach, and there’s something wonderfully reassuring about the way its rhythms unfold. At the same time, the successful execution of that formula requires great performances, and this film delivers like gangbusters with Cooper and Gaga bringing the characters’ talent and chemistry to vibrant life.

    Gaga has some truly spectacular instincts as an actress — her early scenes, when Ally is the most “ordinary,” are just riveting to watch, and she perfectly plays against Cooper’s confounded joy as Jackson, discovering a creative (and romantic) inspiration he’d long thought extinguished. The music further communicates their respective personalities and bolsters the legitimacy of his established — and her ascendant — success, conveying their artistic compatibility but also the stark differences between what they want and what they have to offer (not to mention their ages and levels of experience).

    There is a sort of curious footnote to the movie, however, where Gaga is the greater authority than Cooper: She knows and has intimately experienced the rise, and the obstacles to modern pop stardom, and she comes from a generation where “selling out,” so to speak, is no longer a crime against art, and, in fact, is seemingly something to aspire to. (Certainly, she has not compromised herself in her own career, but she has a more immediate relationship with those pitfalls and perhaps a more comfortable relationship with the prospect of going big, broad, and commercial.)

    WB

    It makes her performance more sympathetic to some of the less desirable, or maybe respectable, tasks that Ally eventually must take on, or chooses to take on; Ally is a born songwriter and singer, but the music she ends up making barely resembles what first creatively drives her, which isn’t “bad” (well, some of it is) but it creates this very interesting meta-commentary on the paths of these two artists and the kinds of art they create. Does a musician need to bear the emotional weight of their life experiences with every song they write? In an age where everything is sold, is it really a compromise for her to perform a song about how good her man looks in his jeans, if she got to write it herself? The movie doesn’t answer, but it’s an ongoing dialogue the movie has as these characters shift their power positions in the relationship, and in their careers.

    As a director, Cooper maintains a remarkably equitable balance between the theatricality of this story and what might approximate a sense of “realism.” More than anything else, however, Cooper creates a feeling in his characters and their journeys that feels absolutely right (for the story) and emotionally believable. In examining Jackson’s alcoholism, he treats the subject (forgive the pun) soberly, showcasing the character’s self-awareness and his shame in destroying beautiful moments and opportunities for the people he loves. In following Ally’s transformation, he does not judge the changes that she makes — even when they seem to violate the core of who she is — and why she felt like she couldn’t succeed before she met Jackson.

    Ultimately just a magical, musical experience — romantic and tragic and irresistibly propulsive — “A Star Is Born” is certainly the kind of movie that seems likely to win awards as the end of the year approaches, but it carries the increasingly rare distinction of being one that feels like it actually and honestly earns the accolades it receives.

  • ‘Green Book’ Enters Oscars Best Picture Race With TIFF People’s Choice Award

    ‘Green Book’ Enters Oscars Best Picture Race With TIFF People’s Choice Award

    Green Book
    Universal Pictures

    The Toronto Film Festival’s People’s Choice Award did not go to Lady Gaga ‘s “A Star Is Born,” Timothée Chalamet‘s “Beautiful Boy,” or Robert Pattinson‘s “High Life.” It also missed buzzy “First Man,” “The Front Runner,” or “Roma.”

    Instead, the win went to “Green Book” — starring Mahershala Ali and Viggo Mortensen, and directed by Peter Farrelly. Yes, “Dumb and Dumber” Peter Farrelly.

    The film follows an Italian-American bouncer (Mortensen) and an African-American pianist (Ali) who confront racism and danger while taking a road trip through the Deep South in 1962.

    As TheWrap noted, nine of the last 10 TIFF People’s Choice winners have gone on to receive Oscar Best Picture nominations, and three have won.

    This was the first year that TIFF moved voting online, as opposed to voting by ticket stubs at the theater. That led some to suspect a popularity contest was ahead, since fans of Gaga, Chalamet, and Pattinson — among others — lobbied for fans to vote multiple times for their favorites. But TIFF took pains to try and prevent “mass campaign voting.”

    Still, “Green Book” was apparently a surprise win, and it automatically launches the film into early Oscar contention.

    Here’s the list of TIFF winners:

    Grolsch People’s Choice Award: “Green Book,” Peter Farrelly
    Runners-up: “If Beale Street Could Talk,” Barry Jenkins; “Roma,” Alfonso Cuaron

    People’s Choice Documentary Award: “Free Solo,” E. Chai Vasarhelvi and Jimmy Chin
    Runners-up: “This Changes Everything,” Tom Donahue; “The Biggest Little Farm,” John Chester

    People’s Choice Midnight Madness Award: “The Man Who Feels No Pain,” Vasan Bala
    Runners-up: “Halloween,” David Gordon Green; “Assassination Nation,” Sam Levinson

    Platform Prize: “Cities of Last Things,” Ho Wi Ding
    Special Mention: “The River,” Emir Baigazin

    Eurimage Audentia Award for Best Female Director: “Fig Tree,” Aalam-Warge Davidian

    Best Canadian Feature Film: “The Fireflies Are Gone,” Sebastien Pilote
    Best Canadian First Feature: “Roads in February,” Katherine Jerkovic

    International Critic (FIPRESCI) Prize for Special Presentations: “Skin,” Guy Nattiv
    International Critic (FIPRESCI) Prize for Discovery program: “Float Like a Butterfly,” Carmel Winters

    NETPAC Award for Best Asian Film: “The Third Wife,” Ash Mayfair
    Special mention: “The Crossing,” Bai Xue

    Short Cuts Award for International Short Film: “The Field,” Sandhya Suri
    Honorable Mentions: “F— You,” Anette Sidor; “This Magnificent Cake!,” Emma de Swaef and Marc James Roels

    Short Cuts Award for Canadian Short Film: “Brotherhood,” Meryam Joobeur
    Honorable Mention: “Fauve,” Jeremy Comte

    Check out the “Green Book” trailer. The film is scheduled to open in theaters November 21st.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Emma Watson Responds to Time’s Up Tattoo Mistake

    2018 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Hosted By Radhika Jones - ArrivalsWant a job spellchecking tattoos? Emma Watson is hiring!

    The “Beauty and the Beast” star caused a bit of a kerfuffle Sunday night when she attended Vanity Fair’s Oscars afterparty sporting a temporary tattoo. It read “Times Up” to support the initiative against sexual harassment in the workplace.

    Grammar nuts on Twitter reacted by pointing out the tattoo’s missing apostrophe. It should’ve read “Time’s Up.” Quite a few noted Watson graduated from Brown University with a degree in English literature.

    Watson herself addressed the punctuation controversy:

    Of course, there were volunteers for the gig:

    Missing apostrophes aside, Watson has been a vocal proponent of the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements. In February, she donated over $1 million to the U.K.’s Justice and Equality Fund, which fights against sexual harassment, assault and discrimination.

    And in January, Watson attended the Golden Globes dressed in black and brought noted activist Marai Larasi as her guest.

  • Listen to Lonely Island’s Scrapped Oscar Song About Movies That Didn’t Get Nominated

    Why not Wonder Woman or Thor or Pennywise for the Oscar?

    There are certain kinds of movies that rarely get nominated for Academy Awards (except in some of the technical categories). It doesn’t matter how well reviewed they are or how much money they rake in at the box office; they’re just never gonna get that Best Picture love.

    The Lonely Island made a song about those movies called “Why Not Me?” for the Oscars ceremony. Unfortunately, it ended up getting scrapped because, as they noted, it was “financially and logistically impossible.” Instead, “For fun, we thought we’d share the rough storyboards of what would have been a fully shot, star-studded music video of exorbitant cost.”

    Thor and Wonder Woman kick off the song, mournfully griping about how all their super heroics don’t mean squat when you’ve got Daniel Day-Lewis sewing.

    Pennywise has a verse, as does “Girls Trip” star Tiffany Haddish. There’s even a chorus with the four Chrises (Pine, Hemsworth, Pratt, and Evans) suggesting the Oscars add a category for them: Best Chris.

    It’s a cute and funny song. Maybe next year’s Oscars budget can expand to make it into an actual video.

  • Oscars 2018: See Keegan-Michael Key’s Sweet Reaction to BFF Jordan Peele’s ‘Get Out’ Win

    “Get Out” writer-director Oscar. And no one was happier for the onetime Comedy Central star than his friend and former castmate, Keegan-Michael Key.

    Key, the other half of the titular duo from the dearly departed sketch series “Key & Peele,” was watching the ceremony with some other celebs (including Colin Hanks) at a party nearby, and literally jumped for joy when his pal was announced as the winner. Photos captured of the sweet reaction depict Key standing on a chair and triumphantly throwing his hands in the air, shouting, and grinning broadly while clutching the hand of another partygoer.

    The comedian also took to Twitter himself to share some love for Peele, writing, “Congrats to my partner in laughs @JordanPeele on his first Oscar,” and adding in the awesome hashtag, #oscarssopeele. The pair ran into each other later that night at the Vanity Fair Oscars party, and shared a sweet embrace.

    Naturally, fans found the public display of affection absolutely heartwarming, and shared their love for the friends’ love on social media.

    May we all have BFFs who love us as much as Key loves Peele.

    [via: Twitter Moments]

  • Oscars 2018: Meryl Streep Updated Her Own Meme Like the Queen She Is

    Is there anything Meryl Streep can’t do? After accruing a staggering 21 Oscar nominations throughout her career — a record of her own making that she continues to break — the answer is seemingly no. And the actress once again one-upped herself during this year’s ceremony, thanks to yet another viral moment caught on camera.

    You may recall that famous meme of Streep enthusiastically cheering, hands cupped around her mouth, that’s been floating around the internet for a few years now. The moment in question was captured back in 2015, when Streep was showing her support for the late actress Debbie Reynolds, who was the recipient of the lifetime achievement statuette at the Screen Actors Guild Awards that year.

    Well, at this year’s Academy Awards ceremony, Best Actress nominee Streep — seated in the front row, which is prime real estate for lots of reaction shots — decided to bestow upon fans a similar celebratory shout. Those watching at home noticed immediately.

    We’d still probably give the edge to the 2015 cheer, since it’s shot from a better angle and thus appears a bit more exuberant. But thankfully, Meryl will probably be nominated a bajillion more times over the years, so she’ll have plenty of chances to outdo herself yet again.

    [h/t Vanity Fair]

  • Oscars 2018: The New Envelopes Had a Hilariously Large Font to Prevent Another Mistake

    The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences did everything in its power this year to prevent a repeat of Oscars telecast, instating a lengthy list of new rules centered around the envelopes containing the winners’ names. One key change involved a complete redesign of said envelopes — and viewers at home definitely noticed.

    It was hard to miss the large, black envelopes stamped with giant, gold lettering, which was also in all caps in case anyone needed extra help making out the writing. (We’re looking at you, Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway.) The category names were actually written twice on the front of the envelopes, and the flap also had the category name scrawled across it, cutting out any possibility of confusion about what envelope presenters were opening.

    Even the inside cards, which revealed the winners’ names, also featured a much larger, bolder font, as can be seen here during Best Costume Design victor (and new jet ski owner) Mark Bridges’s speech. (Tell the truth, Mark: You held your envelope out like that so no one would question whether you won, didn’t you?)

    The writing was so comically large that many viewers took to Twitter to share some snarky thoughts about the new stationery. Some joked that the font was probably visible from space, which honestly probably isn’t too far off.

    Guillermo del Toro, who accepted the statuette when his film “The Shape of Water” took home Best Picture, couldn’t help but double check his envelope when returning presenter Warren Beatty handed it over.

    But thanks to the Academy’s new graphic designer, he really didn’t have to. The dramatic change may have been funny, but at least it worked.

    [via: Twitter Moments]

  • More Oscar Presenters Added, Including Lupita Nyong’o, Sandra Bullock, Dave Chappelle

    EE British Academy Film Awards - Red Carpet ArrivalsWakanda is coming to the Academy Awards.

    Oscar producers Michael De Luca and Jennifer Todd announced another slate of presenters who will appear at Sunday’s ceremony, including “Black Panther” star Lupita Nyong’o. She joins her previously announced co-star, Chadwick Boseman.

    Also on deck to hand out trophies and make segues are past Oscar winners Sandra Bullock, Jane Fonda, Jodie Foster, Nicole Kidman, Matthew McConaughey, Helen Mirren, Rita Moreno, and Christopher Walken.

    Other stars, with movies coming out soon or later this year, include Emily Blunt (“Mary Poppins Returns”), Eugenio Derbez (the gender-switched “Overboard” reboot), and Dave Chappelle (“A Star Is Born”).

    The new names join previously announced presenters Gal Gadot, Mark Hamill, Armie Hammer, Oscar Isaac, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Gina Rodriguez, Eva Marie Saint, Wes Studi, Kelly Marie Tran, Zendaya, Mahershala Ali, Chadwick Boseman, Viola Davis, Laura Dern, Jennifer Garner, Greta Gerwig, Tiffany Haddish, Tom Holland, Kumail Nanjiani, Margot Robbie, Emma Stone and Daniela Vega.

    The 90th Academy Awards, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, airs Sunday at 8 p.m. on ABC.

  • Oscar Race 2018: Too Close to Call

    One reason this year’s Oscar race is so exciting? Everything we think we know about it may be wrong.

    For months, the race has seemed to come down to a slugfest between “The Shape of Water” and “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” Indeed, it’s still very likely that Guillermo del Toro will win a directing Oscar for the former, and that Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell will win Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor for the latter.

    But Best Picture? What if we’re wrong, and neither of them has the shot we think it does?

    Sure, “Shape” has won a number of Best Picture prizes from critics’ groups, and del Toro has won nearly every directing prize available. It also has more nominations than any other movie this year (13 of them), enough to suggest it has support throughout most branches of the Academy.

    Similarly, “Three Billboards” has won the top prize at the Golden Globes, the Screen Actors Guild Awards (SAGs), and just this past weekend, at the British Academy Awards (BAFTAs). The BAFTAs have a modest track record of predicting who will win on this side of the Atlantic, and many of their other winners this year — del Toro, McDormand, Rockwell, Gary Oldman (Best Actor for “Darkest Hour“), and Allison Janney (Best Supporting Actress for “I, Tonya“) — are expected to repeat at our Academy Awards on March 4.

    But you have to take into account some other factors, including the guild awards and the Academy’s tricky voting process. After all, the Academy voters will be thinking of these things when they fill out their ballots this week.

    Aside from the SAGs, the guild awards aren’t televised, but they still matter because they represent the preferences of the many professions that make up the Academy. They also each anticipate a particular award handed out at the Oscars — the so-called “craft” awards that fill up half your Oscar-pool ballot, like cinematography, production design, make-up, and editing.

    In recent weeks, several of the craft guilds have handed out their own prizes. The American Cinema Editors gave their top award to “Dunkirk.” The Motion Picture Sound Editors honored “Blade Runner 2049.” That film also won with the American Society of Cinematographers. (Cross your fingers, Roger Deakins fans; the cinematographer has gone 0 for 13 at the Oscars, but his “Blade Runner” work may mean that the 14th time’s the charm.) The Visual Effects Society recognized “War for the Planet of the Apes.” And the Art Directors Guild honored “Shape of Water.” Still to come are awards from the costume designers, hair and make-up artists, and sound mixers, all of which will be handed out during the final Oscar balloting period that runs from February 20 through the 27th.

    The fact that these awards spread the wealth all over the place makes it that much harder to guess how they’ll vote for Best Picture, especially since “Blade Runner” and “Apes” aren’t in the running for the top prize. But you can’t even rely on the major guild awards, like the SAGs or the Directors Guild (which honored del Toro) as reliable predictors anymore.

    There used to be a number of hard and fast rules about which precursor awards a movie needed to win or at least be nominated for in order to land a Best Picture Oscar. A movie that didn’t get a SAG Best Ensemble nomination historically has had no chance to win Best Picture. If the Academy voters or the Golden Globes didn’t nominate the movie for Best Director, it wouldn’t win Best Picture either. And if Oscar voters didn’t nominate a movie for writing or acting, or failed to nominate it for any of the craft awards, it had no shot at the top prize either.

    But this year, at least one of those rules will have to go out the window. There’s not one among the nine Best Picture nominees whose victory won’t break at least one of these rules. Six of the nine — “Shape of Water,” “Dunkirk,” “Call Me by Your Name,” “The Post,” “Darkest Hour,” and “Phantom Thread” — didn’t get that SAG nomination. The Globes didn’t nominate the directors of “Get Out,” “Lady Bird,” or “Phantom Thread,” while the Academy didn’t nominate the directors of “Three Billboards,” “Call Me by Your Name,” or “The Post.” Neither group nominated the director of “Darkest Hour.” “Dunkirk” has no Oscar nominations for writing or acting. “Lady Bird,” Get Out,” and “The Post” have no craft nominations.

    Why are these stats important? Because the whole Academy votes on Best Picture, so a film needs the support of the editors, set designers, and hairstylists as well as the producers, directors, writers, and stars whose names appear during a movie’s opening credits.

    Best Picture voting uses a complicated system of proportional representation, in which voters mark not just one choice but several ranked choices. It’s a system, then, that tends to reject the most polarizing, love-it-or-hate-it movies. Rather, the process favors consensus movies — maybe not the ones with the most intense fanbases, but the ones that just enough voters can get behind, the ones that may not get the most first-place votes on Academy members’ ballots but at least are among the top vote-getters on the most members’ lists.

    Seen that way, you have to wonder if the race is really between “Shape of Water” and “Three Billboards” after all. Del Toro’s human-sea monster love story is lyrical and poignant, but is it just too weird a fantasy tale to top all the ballots it needs to win? The lack of a SAG nomination suggests that the support for the movie among actors, the Academy’s biggest branch, is weak. Similarly, “Three Billboards” may feel like a timely expression of rage, but many voters may think its racial politics are problematic, it’s ending is unsatisfying, and it’s not as well directed as at least five other nominees.

    So that leaves an opening for one of the other nominees. Let’s assume that “Call Me by Your Name” and “Phantom Thread” are too exotic, and that “Darkest Hour” doesn’t have enough going for it besides Gary Oldman’s performance. That leaves “The Post,” “Lady Bird,” “Get Out,” and “Dunkirk.” Might one of these have enough broad-based Academy support to overcome the fact that it hasn’t been top-tier enough to earn the precursor awards and nominations that have made “Shape of Water” and “Three Billboards” into leading contenders?

    With “The Post” — obviously, the Academy loves Meryl Streep and Steven Spielberg (though not enough to nominate him for directing this time), and it loves intrepid-journalists-behind-real-life-exposé dramas, like recent Best Picture winner “Spotlight.” But the movie’s near shut-out in precursor awards, not to mention the fact that the Academy nominated it for only two prizes, suggests that the broad-based support for “The Post” is not there.

    “Lady Bird” has been a critics’ favorite for months, and the Academy has a chance to make history by making Greta Gerwig only the second woman ever to win a Best Director Oscar. But its coming-of-age story may feel too low-stakes, and the lack of craft nominations suggests that rank-and-file Academy members didn’t love the film.

    “Get Out” also has a chance to make history, with Jordan Peele potentially becoming the first African-American to earn a Best Director Oscar. His nominated screenplay certainly couldn’t have been more topical or timely. Then again, “Get Out” has the same apparent lack of craft support that “Lady Bird” does, and its horror elements may turn off some Academy members.

    So, “Dunkirk”? It does tell an old-fashioned story of World War II heroism, but its technique is certainly modern. It’s lack of acting and writing nominations may not matter, since individual performance and dialogue were sorta beside the point. The Academy’s craft branches loved it, and Christopher Nolan may finally get his due as a director after numerous Oscar snubs.

    Most of all, “Dunkirk” doesn’t step on anyone’s toes, politically speaking. In an Academy seeking consensus, it may be the least alienating choice. It may not be the movie that Hollywood is most proud of this year, but it may also be the movie that Hollywood is least embarrassed by.