Tag: oscar-predictions

  • Oscar Predictions 2015: Who Will Win Best Director?

    Best Director Predictions Oscars 2015With the 2015 Oscars almost here, Moviefone will be releasing a set of staff predictions each day this week (in countdown fashion) for the four major categories. We wrap it up today with arguably the hottest contested race: Best Director.

    We’ve already given you the beat on the 2015 Oscars race, so now let’s break down our favorites to win the award. Here, we’ve listed the directors we expect to win, and then, more importantly, who we think should win.

    Tim Hayne
    Who Will Win: Alejandro González Iñárritu. The Academy loves an innovator — just look at Alfonso Cuaròn’s 2014 win for “Gravity” — and this year will be no different. “Birdman” is a wild ride, visually and emotionally. Iñárritu​ took what could have been an inside-baseball, rarified glimpse into the world of stage acting and the Hollywood career cycle and turned it into a riveting voyage into Batman’s burned-out actor Riggan Thomson’s comeback-obsessed psyche. I hope he tackles a remake of “Sunset Blvd.” next. Norma Desmond won’t know what hit her.

    Who Should Win: Richard Linklater. Hey, I’m a huge Iñárritu fan, but I’ve got to give props to Linklater for really going out on a limb for “Boyhood.” Not only did he commit 12 years of his life to project — and convince his actors to do the same — he was able to get the movie financed. The end result is a stirring, heartbreaking, and nostalgia-filled journey through adolescence that will likely be held up as the pinnacle of coming-of-age filmmaking for years to come.

    Alana Altmann
    Who Will Win:
    Richard Linklater for “Boyhood.” This is really a tight race between him and Alejandro González Iñárritu for “Birdman,” but we think Linklater will pull off the win after coming out on top at the BAFTAs and Golden Globes. We’ll spare you a spiel about the whole it took 12 years to make thing, but we don’t think that innovative cinematic feat went unnoticed when voters were deciding.

    Who Should Win: Richard Linklater for “Boyhood.” This is film that took a deeply personal vision and ran with it to extremes. “Birdman” is a technical accomplishment, but it’s a surreal one, that doesn’t quite touch the artfully executed purity of “Boyhood”‘s simple story. Linklater is a realist auteur who achieved in creating a coming-of-age classic.

    Jonny Black
    Who Will Win: Alejandro González Iñárritu. “Birdman” has been praised for its standout performances all around, earning both Michael Keaton and Edward Norton acting nominations, but its most impressive feat is its technically innovative directing. Iñárritu combines a collection of beautiful, tight long takes that give the film the effect that it was shot in one seamless take. Even more impressive? Iñárritu didn’t want to recreate the inside of a theater, so all the sequences inside the theater (the St. James in New York) were shot in two weeks. The Academy may like more traditional films for Best Picture, but just like with Alfonso Cuaron last year for “Gravity,” Academy voters seem to laud unique and innovative direction.

    Who Should Win: Richard Linklater. From the get-go, the footage from “Boyhood” could have ended up being worthless, but Linklater instead pieced together a stirring nostalgic epic from 12 years of footage — and it’s now the favorite for Best Picture. Linklater had the foresight and, really, the guts to commit himself to this 12 year experimental film (shot over 39 days). Admittedly, the argument for Linklater or Iñárritu is tough; both are true visionaries, but do you laud a beautiful vision that is executed over a decade or a taut, meta-journey that is a technical wonder?

    Who’s your pick? Tell us in the comments below, and find out which star wins Best Director when the Oscars air live Sunday, February 22 at 7 ET / 4 PT on ABC.
    %Slideshow-267828%

  • Final Predictions for the 2015 Oscars

    oscars 2015 predictionsWhen it comes to predicting success and failure in Hollywood, as “The Princess Bride” screenwriter William Goldman famously said, “Nobody knows anything.” Well, nobody except the accountants at PricewaterhouseCooper, who are currently counting the Oscar ballots in anticipation of Sunday’s Academy Awards. But the rest of us know nothing, even experienced Oscar prognosticators.

    That’s especially true this year, when only a handful of the 24 categories seem like foregone conclusions. The rest are tight races, all the way down to Best Picture. This should make the Feb. 22 telecast suspenseful, but it also makes filling out your own Oscar ballot harder. Still, here are my predictions, based on nearly three decades of covering the Academy Awards, attending the ceremony a few times, having kept a close watch on the current race, and a wet index finger held up to the wind. If I do well, I’ll be bragging on Monday; if not, remember what Goldman said.

    1. Best Original Song
    Let’s start with an easy one. “Selma” got only two nominations, and this is one. Sounds cynical, but giving the prize to “Glory” will help Academy members feel like they’ve erased some of the #OscarsSoWhite stigma that greeted this year’s less-than-diverse nomination slate. That’ll outweigh the sentimental vote for Alzheimer’s-afflicted Glen Campbell (“I’m Not Gonna Miss You”) and the awesome vote (for “Everything Is Awesome,” a humorous tune that was actually integral to “The LEGO Movie.”

    2. Best Original Score
    Alexandre Desplat is nominated twice (for “The Imitation Game” and “The Grand Budapest Hotel”), but the award will go to Icelandic composer Johann Johannsson, whose score really makes “The Theory of Everything,” and which has won the major precursor awards so far.

    3. Best Sound Editing
    This award, for sound effects, typically goes to the loudest movie. In this case, the gun battles of “American Sniper” should hit the mark.

    4. Best Sound Mixing
    This award represents a movie’s overall soundtrack. Last weekend, the Cinema Audio Society, representing Hollywood’s sound mixers, gave its prize to “Birdman,” and that’s also the likely pick for the Oscar.

    5. Best Visual Effects
    It’s really between Marvel’s smash “Guardians of the Galaxy” and Christopher Nolan’s “Interstellar.” Nolan’s films tend to clean up in the technical categories, and the movie’s striking space-travel sequences mean the rest of the contenders are likely to be sucked into a wormhole.

    6. Best Makeup and Hairstyling
    The primary contenders here are “Guardians,” again, and “The Grand Budapest Hotel.” Given the Academy’s general disdain for comic-book films and fondness for period pictures — not to mention the Wes Anderson comedy’s impressive array of facial hair and turning Tilda Swinton into an ancient dowager, I’ll go with “Budapest.”

    7. Best Costume Design
    Again, handsome period pictures rule, which rules out “Into the Woods” and “Maleficent,” the scruffy hippie-wear of “Inherent Vice,” and the too-subtle 19th-century England of “Mr. Turner.” The more flamboyant 1930s costumes of “Budapest” should take the prize.

    8. Best Foreign Language Film
    Russia’s “Leviathan” has been a strong contender so far, but when in doubt, pick the movie about the Holocaust. That would be Poland’s “Ida,” which also happens to be a standout for its stark black-and-white cinematography and its not-too-taxing running time.

    9. Best Live-Action Short
    Three of the shorts are fascinating glimpses of remote cultures that most Hollywood viewers will find too exotic. “Boogaloo and Graham” has the cute-Irish-kids factor going for it, but it’ll be trumped by the Academy’s Anglophilia. “The Phone Call,” starring well-respected British thespians Sally Hawkins and Jim Broadbent, in a movie with a tearjerking suicide-hotline plot, will win.

    10. Best Documentary Short
    All five films are about extraordinary bleak subjects, so the most accessible one will win. That rules out the two Polish entries (“Joanna” and “Our Curse”) and Mexican slaughterhouse tale “La Parka (The Reaper).” That leaves American entries “White Earth” and “Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1.” Not only does this tie neatly into the likelihood of a Live-Action Short win for “The Phone Call,” but it also gives the voters a way to prove they support the troops without having to honor “American Sniper.” Plus, it’s made by HBO, usually a quality seal of approval for documentaries.

    11. Best Documentary Feature
    I’ve seen indications of support for jungle doc “Virunga,” and artist bio “Finding Vivian Maier.” “Last Days in Vietnam” and “The Salt of the Earth” are by filmmakers (Rory Kennedy and Wim Wenders, respectively) who are familiar enough that they could get votes on name recognition alone. But the standout, as a work of reportage, as a treatment of a timely subject, and as a winner of numerous precursor awards, is Laura Poitras’s documentary about her interaction with Edward Snowden, “Citizenfour.” It seems all but unstoppable.

    12. Best Animated Short
    When in doubt, go with the Disney cartoon. That means “Feast,” the endearing tale about a dog’s life that some wags have dubbed “Puppyhood.”

    13. Best Animated Feature
    With the snub of “The LEGO Movie” and the absence of a Pixar entry, this is a tough category to guess. Leaving aside the little-seen “Song of the Sea” and “The Tale of the Princess Kaguya,” that leaves “The Boxtrolls” (too weird, not popular enough), “Big Hero 6,” and “How to Train Your Dragon 2.” “Dragon” has won most of the precursor awards, so it’s the favorite.

    14. Best Production Design
    Production design is practically a character in Wes Anderson’s movies, never more so than in the extravagant life-size dollhouse that is the Grand Budapest Hotel. The Academy is bound to recognize that.

    15. Best Cinematography
    Someday, the Academy will give “Unbroken”‘s Roger Deakins an honorary trophy for a career’s worth of painterly imagery, to make up for the fact that he’s been nominated 12 times without winning. That’ll include this year, since the award will go to last year’s winner, Emmanuel “Chivo” Lubezki, for his seemingly seamless work on the long tracking shots of “Birdman.”

    16. Best Editing
    This is an especially difficult category, with many strong contenders. The comic rhythms of “Budapest,” the tightly-wound jazz tempo of “Whiplash,” the battleground suspense of “American Sniper” — all are worthy choices. But the prize will probably go to Sandra Adair for the monumental achievement of cutting 12 years worth of footage on “Boyhood.”

    17. Best Adapted Screenplay
    “Whiplash” doesn’t even belong here; it should be in the Original Screenplay category, but for a hairsplitting technicality in Academy rules. That Paul Thomas Anderson was able to make even a semi-coherent script out of Thomas Pynchon’s shaggy-dog detective novel ought to win the prize for “Inherent Vice,” but the movie is too polarizing. Jason Hall has been accused of copping out by not making any moral or political judgments about Chris Kyle, so “American Sniper” is out. That leaves the British biopics “The Theory of Everything” and “The Imitation Game.” Of the two, “Imitation” is less conventional, and criticism that it downplayed Alan Turing’s homosexuality hasn’t stuck. Plus, it has the mighty Weinstein campaign apparatus behind it. So Graham Moore gets the trophy.

    18. Best Original Screenplay
    “Birdman” is kinda weird and surreal, “Boyhood” seems like it was more improvised than written, and “Foxcatcher” and “Nightcrawler” are lucky just to be nominated. So that leaves Wes Anderson’s clever comedy-drama “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” a screenplay everyone admires and likes, if not loves.

    19. Best Supporting Actress
    It’s so patronizing when critics and industry insiders talk about how “brave” an actress’s performance is. Usually, that’s code for “she took off her clothes” or “she went without makeup.” In the case of Patricia Arquette, it’s that she allowed herself to be seen aging 12 years on screen, without the crutches of cosmetics or plastic surgery. Of course, she also acted the hell out of her motherly “Boyhood” role. Which is why she’s had a lock on this category since day one.

    20. Best Supporting Actor
    Again, despite all the fine work done by the competition, J.K. Simmons’s whip-cracking “Whiplash” music teacher has steamrollered everyone since the film was released.

    21. Best Actress
    This category was Julianne Moore’s to lose even before most people had seen her performance as an early-onset Alzheimer’s patient in “Still Alice.” Once the movie finally opened in January, the buzz was confirmed. Of course, it doesn’t hurt that this is the kind of physical/mental challenge role that routinely wins Oscars, or that people feel Moore is due after being nominated four previous times without winning.

    22. Best Actor
    This is the only acting category with any suspense. Still, as great as Benedict Cumberbatch was in “The Imitation Game,” his character may be too chilly to be the kind of hero the Academy can line up behind. Steve Carell made an astonishing transformation from comic actor to weirdo villain in “Foxcatcher,” but there’s not much love for the movie. Bradley Cooper earned his third nomination in three years for playing Chris Kyle in “American Sniper,” and his only flaw was that he’s not Eddie Redmayne or Michael Keaton this year. In “The Theory of Everything,” Redmayne had the more physically challenging role, as the increasingly immobile Stephen Hawking, but Keaton’s role in “Birdman” offers the semi-autobiographical comeback narrative that the Academy loves. Plus, it’s his first nomination, despite a three-decade career as a beloved star. And can you imagine anyone else in the part? The category is a tough call, with Redmayne and Keaton so close that Cooper could step in as a spoiler if they cancel each other out. But I’ll give the edge to Keaton, especially since “Birdman” will be riding a wave of good will.

    23. Best Directing
    You can forget “Foxcatcher’s” Bennett Miller and “Imitation Game’s” Morten Tyldum (who?) People love “Grand Budapest Hotel,” but Wes Anderson will be happy to settle for a screenplay Oscar. That leaves “Boyhood” creator Richard Linklater and “Birdman” auteur Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu. The latter won the Director’s Guild prize, but we’ve seen Best Picture and Best Director split six times over the past 16 years. Which is why I think this prize will go to frequent precursor award winner Linklater. More than the story (which is obviously autobiographical and very personal to Linklater), the Academy admires the sheer nervy feat of seeing his vision through over the course of 12 years. “Birdman” may be a work of art, but “Boyhood” is a labor of love.

    24. Best Picture
    The complicated proportional-voting rules, which urge voters to pick their top five movies in order of preference, encourage consensus choices and weed out divisive movies. That’s why “American Sniper” and “Selma” won’t win. Movies that don’t have broad consensus support — “The Theory of Everything,” “The Imitation Game,” and “Whiplash” — won’t make it either. There is a lot of support for “Grand Budapest Hotel,” which is tied with “Birdman” for the most nominations this year (both have nine, compared to six for “Boyhood”), so there’s a slim chance that it could sneak in if “Boyhood” and “Birdman” cancel each other out. But the race has been between “Boyhood” and “Birdman” for months now, and while “Boyhood” was the early frontrunner, a backlash has now set in against it.

    Why the sudden turn against “Boyhood”? There have been all kinds of crazy rationales floated in the last couple of weeks. One Academy member couldn’t relate to the everyday struggles of its ordinary characters, calling them “garbage and losers.” The movie’s 12-year shoot supposedly made it derivative of Michael Apted’s “Up” documentaries. Its allegedly patronizing treatment of its sole substantive Latino character (the one who takes up the suggestion by Patricia Arquette’s character that he should go to college) makes the film even more insidiously racist than “Birth of a Nation.” But the simplest explanation, and the one that holds the most water, is that it peaked too early. It was dubbed the frontrunner from the time it was released eight months ago. (Yes, “Grand Budapest Hotel” came out even earlier, but no one was making the extravagant claims for it that “Boyhood” enjoyed.) And it’s hard to be the frontrunner for that long without getting a big fat target painted on your back.

    “Birdman” pulled up even with “Boyhood” as soon as it was released last fall. As with “Boyhood,” everyone respected its craftsmanship, artistry, and daring structure (though not its prickly cynicism). While “Boyhood” won a lot of early awards, especially at the Golden Globes, “Birdman” won the ones that matter — the Producers Guild, Screen Actors Guild, and Directors Guild, picked by industry insiders who are often Academy voters as well. The movie has a better backstage narrative than “Boyhood,” not only as Michael Keaton’s vindicating comeback, but as the underdog for being slightly behind “Boyhood” for so much of the Oscar race. Finally, it’s a movie about self-absorbed showbiz folk, people Academy voters will find a lot more relatable than “Boyhood”‘s middle-American nobodies. The underdog/showbiz angle means Iñarritu could lose Best Director to Linklater and still have the movie win Best Picture, à la “Argo.”

    It’s going to be close — how close, we’ll never know, since the Academy never releases vote tallies — but in the end, I expect “Birdman” to soar.
    %Slideshow-267828%

  • Oscar Predictions 2015: What Will Win Best Picture?

    Best Picture 2015 Oscars
    Can you smell the Oscars yet?!

    With the 87th Academy Awards almost here, Moviefone will be releasing a set of staff predictions each day this week (in countdown fashion) for the four major categories. We kicked it off with Best Actress and Best Actor, and now turn our attention to another hotly-contested race: Best Picture.

    We’ve already given you the beat on the 2015 Oscars race, so now let’s break down our favorites to win the award. Here, we’ve listed the movie we expect to win, and then, more importantly, what we think should win.

    Tim Hayne
    What Will Win: “Boyhood.” Let’s face it: There only two contenders in this race: “Boyhood” and “Birdman.” And the advantage belongs to the former. The 12-years-in-the-making, Richard Linklater-directed drama has already been racking up the awards, most notably taking home a Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture, Drama. Also, the Academy loves a good backstory, and the fact that Linklater and his cast committed to making the movie for a dozen years is kinda nuts. Not that “Birdman” is without a backstory — former Batman Michael Keaton playing a version of himself is certainly notable — but, in the end, the Academy looks for heart in their Best Picture winners, and “Boyhood” has plenty to spare.

    What Should Win: “Boyhood.” I’m a huge fan of any movie that offers up something new (hey, I’m in the minority of people who believe “Gravity” should have won over “12 Years a Slave” last year), and the family drama’s conceit is just that: new. Director Richard Linklater and his cast took a risk (and a lot of time) chronicling the life of a family over 12 years for “Boyhood,” and that kind of innovative, dedicated filmmaking should be rewarded. Plus, if “Boyhood” wins, there’s at least a chance that longtime Linklater enthusiast Matthew McConaughey will rush the stage and deliver a meandering, nonsensical speech honoring his friend, making it all worth it.

    Alana Altmann
    What Will Win: “Boyhood.” It won Best Picture at the BAFTAs, Golden Globes, and the Critics’ Choice so it seems to be on track for the big cinematic prize of the year. And keep in mind that this is one movie that relates to pretty much anyone with a family and explores the human condition (unless you happen to be an unnecessarily mean drum teacher or a delusional washed-up actor) so it means a lot to audiences.

    What Should Win: First of all, A for effort. This was a 12 year commitment! And that was during Patricia Arquette’s busy “Medium” years! But project loyalty isn’t the only reason its an important film. The novelty of authentically spanning over more than a decade just assists in poignantly capturing a universal experience that holds a mirror up to our own lives. Sometimes the “everyday” can be more powerful than the extraordinary, and that’s what this film does right.

    Jonny Black
    What Will Win: “Birdman.” Barely. “Boyhood” vs. “Birdman” is going to come down to the wire and, honestly, “Boyhood” feels like the nice, nostalgic, and inspirational film the Academy loves to give Best Picture, but I just can’t help believing “Birdman” is going to pull this one out. It’s a gut decision (in other words, I might be crazy). The dark themes, the incredible acting, and the tight, technically spectacular directing are what will make the Academy voters tip the scale in favor of “Birdman.”

    What Should Win: “Boyhood.” Sometimes your gut isn’t what you necessarily want. Despite believing that “Birdman” will win, I think “Boyhood” should win. Director Richard Linklater started filming this over a decade ago — and it could have gone nowhere. Instead, Linklater sculpted a narrative with 39 days of shooting over 12 years that makes every person remember what it was really like to grow up. Tell me you didn’t relate to at least something that happened in the film. “Boyhood” is a movie that makes you feel deeply at almost every turn. That’s an accomplishment. As the film scales so many years, each moment is fleeting and, therefore, feels spectacularly important.
    %Slideshow-260994%

  • Oscar Predictions 2015: Who Will Win Best Actor?

    Best Actor Predictions 2015 OscarsWith the 2015 Oscars almost here, Moviefone will be releasing a set of staff predictions each day this week (in countdown fashion) for the four major categories. We kicked it off yesterday with Best Actress, and now turn our attention to a hotly-contested race: Best Actor.

    We’ve already given you the beat on the 2015 Oscars race, so now let’s break down our favorites to win the award. Here, we’ve listed the actors we expect to win, and then, more importantly, who we think should win.

    Tim Hayne
    Who Will Win: Eddie Redmayne. The actor’s transformative performance as physics genius Stephen Hawking in “The Theory of Everything” is, perhaps, the most talked about of the year, and it’s already earned him a Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild Award. The only person who could possibly upset the race at this point is Bradley Cooper, whose performance in “American Sniper” has been celebrated by audiences to the tune of more than $300M at the box office.

    Who Should Win: Michael Keaton. If not for his performance in “Birdman,” than for his career as a whole. Keaton is the dark horse in this race, for sure, but his dramatic (and comedic) turn as, basically, a version of himself in Alejandro González Iñárritu’s dark comedy is fantastically nuanced and powerful. No disrespect to Redmayne, but it’s pretty early in the 33-year-old’s career; let’s give the Oscar to someone who’s filmography includes iconic turns in “Beetlejuice,” “Batman,” and, one my personal favorites, “Mr. Mom.”​

    Alana Altmann
    Who Will Win: Eddie Redmayne, but by a narrow margin. A physically transformative portrayal of a real-life figure will most likely trump an actor playing an… actor. (Hello, “Birdman.”) The visually stunning “Theory of Everything” is the kind of Oscar-friendly biopic that lands its leading men gold. See: Colin Firth in “The King’s Speech,” Jamie Foxx in “Ray,” and Daniel Day-Lewis in “My Left Foot” and “Lincoln.” The same logic could be used for Bradley Cooper and Benedict Cumberbatch’s roles, but Redmayne’s face looked all different and stuff.

    Who Should Win: Michael “Birdman” Keaton. He flies high (JK — I’ll spare you those bird puns!) shines while bringing tormented washed up Hollywood actor Riggan Thomson to life in a way we couldn’t imagine another actor doing. Whether you enjoyed the overwhelming, chaotic meta-ness of “Birdman” or not, it’s hard to deny his riveting performance. Keaton musters his own special blend of magical manic restlessness while embodying vulnerability, bitterness, and the universal fear of failure. To not give him this award would be a total fowl. (Sorry, we had to.)

    Jonny Black
    Who Will Win: Michael Keaton. “Birdman” director Alejandro González Iñárritu said prior to the film’s release that he wanted Keaton for the role because he could navigate drama and comedy, adding “a meta-dialogue to the film.” Keaton was thrown the perfect pass and he delivers, beautifully handling the self-loathing and struggles of former superhero star Riggan Thomson. There’s no denying Eddie Redmayne’s momentum leading up to the Oscars after taking home a Golden Globe and a SAG award and, frankly, there’s no denying his talent — he’s unbelievable in “The Theory of Everything.” Redmayne could take the Oscar home and it would hardly be a steal, but Keaton’s long history with the Academy will give him the win by a nose.

    Who Should Win: Michael Keaton. Ehhh… Eddie Redmayne? Redmayne turns in a hell of a performance, one that is now getting the backlash label of “physical acting,” but who are we kidding? The young Brit let Stephen Hawking’s struggles, emotional and physical, seep into his being and he delivers a raw and moving performance. Ultimately, though, Michael Keaton just is Riggan Thomson. Is there anyone else you can even imagine in that role? It’s impossible to take your eyes off him and he should take home the Oscar.

    Who’s your pick? Tell us in the comments below, and find out which star wins Best Actor when the Oscars air live Sunday, February 22 at 7 ET / 4 PT on ABC.

    %Slideshow-260994%

  • Oscar Predictions 2015: Who Will Win Best Actress?

    Best Actress 2015This Sunday, all eyes will be on the star-studded Oscars!

    With less than a week before the big night, it’s time to look back and reexamine the most noteworthy performances and films of 2014. In countdown fashion, Moviefone will be releasing a set of staff predictions each day this week for the four major categories — kicking it off today with Best Actress.

    We’ve already given you the beat on the 2015 Oscars race, so now let’s break down our favorites to win Best Actress. Here, we’ve listed the actress we expect to win, and then, more importantly, which ones we think should win.

    Tim Hayne
    Who Will Win: Julianne Moore. Not only has she already won the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role (a predictor of Oscar glory) for her portrayal of a woman dealing with early-onset Alzheimer’s in “Still Alice,” but Moore is poised to take home the trophy on career merit alone. This is her fifth nomination, and, in 2003, she became one of only a handful of actors to be nominated in both the Best Supporting and Best Actress categories. Her career has been filled with widely varied roles, many of them lauded, and the Academy undoubtedly believes she’s paid her dues. In short, it’s time.

    Who Should Win: Julianne Moore. I mean, come on. She deserves it for all the reasons I mentioned above, and more. It’s her year.

    Alana Altmann
    Who Will Win: Julianne Moore. Most people probably already assume the accomplished powerhouse has an Oscar under her belt, but the nominee has sadly gone home empty handed four times in the past. The versatile actress turned an unremarkable small film with a overwhelmingly heavy concept like “Still Alice” into something worth talking about. It’s her year to take it, especially since her competition isn’t that steep…

    Who Should Win: Julianne Moore. But we’re pretending she’s getting the award for the “will you be my mommy?” scene in “Boogie Nights.” Just kidding. (Sort of). What could have treaded into sappy tear-bait territory in “Still Alice” turned out to be a powerful, moving, and relatable portrayal of a woman whose world is slipping through her finger tips. And although we’re picking Julianne here, we’re going to take a moment to shout out Rosamund Pike’s nuanced breakout work as “Gone Girl’s” Amazing Amy just because it was one of the most fun performances to watch this year. It’s just not quite Moore-level emotional rawness.

    Jonny Black
    Who Will Win: Julianne Moore. She was incredible in “Still Alice” and has racked up award after award for her performance, and rightfully so. I mean, she’s the main draw for a downer of a movie (the story centers on Moore’s character who’s recently been diagnosed with early onset Alzheimer’s) and carries it alongside an impressive performance from Kristen Stewart. Moore’s 2015 nod is her fifth career Oscar nomination and it’s about time she takes home the golden statuette — she’s rarely been more deserving.

    Who Should Win: Julianne Moore. She’s fantastic in the movie and has more than paid her Academy dues. Have we even mentioned another actress’s name for this year’s race? Barely. She’s also front and center in two of the greatest and most talked about movies of the last twenty years, “Boogie Nights” (1997) and “The Big Lebowski” (1998), so just give her the damn thing!

    What’s your pick? Tell us in the comments below, and find out which star wins Best Actress when the Oscars air live Sunday, February 22 at 7 ET / 4 PT on ABC.
    %Slideshow-260994%