Tag: michael-crichton

  • Movie Review: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’

    Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ receives 5.5 out of 10 stars.

    Opening in theaters on July 2nd is ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, the latest in the long-running dinosaur franchise that originated with 1993 classic ‘Jurassic Park’.

    Directed by Gareth Edwards (‘The Creator’), the new movie stars Scarlett Johansson (‘Avengers: Endgame’), Jonathan Bailey (‘Wicked’), Rupert Friend (‘The Phoenician Scheme’), Mahershala Ali (‘Green Book’), Manuel Garcia-Rulfo (‘The Lincoln Lawyer’) and Ed Skrein (‘Deadpool’).

    Related Article: Scarlett Johansson and Jonathan Bailey Lead First Look at ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’

    Initial Thoughts

    (L to R) Luna Blaise and the T-Rex in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (L to R) Luna Blaise and the T-Rex in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    The latest entry in the ‘Jurassic World’ franchise –– all birthed, of course, from the DNA of Michael Crichton’s 1990 novel ‘Jurassic Park’ and the all-time classic movie Steven Spielberg made from it –– arrives with plenty of promise.

    You have director Gareth Edwards, who has shown an ability to bring humanity to big-scale movies (even if his box office results don’t always align), and original ‘Park’ screenwriter David Koepp back unleashing the dino chaos from the page.

    Loaded with references to how the world at large is generally over reconstituted dinosaurs coexisting (and that the creatures themselves are dying in our modern climate), it’s a meta meditation on how the movie franchise itself has evolved (not to mention the various attempts to bring giant creatures to the screen in other monsterverses) and every new effort needs to up the wow factor.

    Script and Direction

    Director Gareth Edwards on the set of 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Director Gareth Edwards on the set of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    If you weren’t aware that David Koepp wrote the script for ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, the initial chunk of the screenplay might make you wonder whether it was someone else who had fed Koepp’s previous work into Chat GPT and asked it to replicate that, while throwing in some truly egregious movie cliches.

    Following a relatively effective opening sequence which (briefly) introduces the new big bad dinosaur, we’re treated to expository title cards explaining how the public’s interest in the giant beasties has waned, and how they’re slowly dying out aside from in certain areas near the equator, which have become strict quarantine areas.

    Then, the same information is repeated in a news broadcast, and at least one of the main characters says something similar. You’re beaten over the head with the details in such an inorganic fashion that you wonder if it was added in as studio executives panicked that we as an audience might not get it.

    Director Gareth Edwards on the set of 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Director Gareth Edwards on the set of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Likewise, the vast majority of the characters beyond a couple of leading figures are less one-note, more half-note, and at least two might as well have “dinosaur snack” written on their foreheads in place of personalities. Yes, that’s par for the course in a ‘Jurassic’ outing, but it’s all so poorly laid out here.

    Gareth Edwards knows his way around an action sequence, and he’s certainly shot some lush locations here, bringing agreeably crunchy reality to moments. Some of the set pieces, such as an early Mosasaur encounter and one with giant flying Quetzalcoatlus creatures are well-realized, as is the amusing initial appearance of a toothy franchise stalwart.

    But some moments are so clearly and painfully ripped off from the original ‘Jurassic Park’ you can almost hear that movie calling this one to demand its toys back. The initial glimpse of the Titanosaurus echoes the Brachiosaurus reveal from the first film, while the human characters trying to evade becoming dino food in a convenience store is essentially that movie’s raptor kitchen scene. In this case, Easter eggs feel like less like fan service and more a lack of original thinking.

    Cast and Performances

    Mahershala Ali is Duncan Kincaid in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Mahershala Ali is Duncan Kincaid in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Scarlett Johansson’s “security and extraction expert” Zora Bennett is at least a more interesting character than some of the ‘World’ movies’ equivalents, and she certainly brings an entertainingly glib style to her initial scenes. But even Johansson can’t rescue a character burdened by first-draft personal pain, and she’s ultimately less successful than she might have been.

    Rupert Friend is Martin Krebs, who represents the company looking to profit from the medical material that the team has been sent to retrieve. Friend does what he can with the role, but he’s mostly just a hissable antagonist from word one.

    Jonathan Bailey plays paleontologist expert Dr. Henry Loomis, recruited to help on the mission, who blossoms into a more active character in the Jeff Goldblum mold. Still, as with everyone else, he’s limited by the script.

    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Likewise Mahershala Ali, a man with two Oscars on his mantle at home, who puts all he can into ship captain and all-round fixer Duncan Kincaid. He has some good moments, but the character is lost among a wash of others.

    Prime among them is ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’s Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, playing Reuben Delgado, a father to two daughters who is sailing with them near the dangerous waters, and whose boat is attacked by Mosasaurs. Garcia-Rulfo is typically good in the role, but even he’s saddled with cliché and convenience, such as one of his kids bringing an annoying, lazy boyfriend along on the trip and an injured leg from the early dino attack that mysteriously heals itself later in the movie.

    Final Thoughts

    Scarlett Johansson is Zora Bennett in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Scarlett Johansson is Zora Bennett in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    While some sequences and Edwards’ commitment to tactile, real-world locations and some practical effects among the digital soup offer minor pleasures, the hulking weight of a cliché-ridden script and dino action that doesn’t so much as reference what’s gone before but rips it off wholesale, the new ‘Jurassic’ entry is miss.

    This ‘Rebirth’ turns out to be largely a ‘saur disappointment.

    iDV9ECfrlJVXq7MAkRW8k1

    What’s the story of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’?

    Five years after the events of ‘Jurassic World Dominion’, the planet’s ecology has proven largely inhospitable to dinosaurs. Those remaining exist in isolated equatorial environments with climates resembling the one in which they once thrived. The three most colossal creatures across land, sea and air within that tropical biosphere hold, in their DNA, the key to a drug that will bring miraculous life-saving benefits to humankind.

    Scarlett Johansson plays skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett, contracted to lead a skilled team on a top-secret mission to secure the genetic material. When Zora’s operation intersects with a civilian family whose boating expedition was capsized by marauding aquatic dinos, they all find themselves stranded on a forbidden island that had once housed an undisclosed research facility for Jurassic Park. There, in a terrain populated by dinosaurs of vastly different species, they come face-to-face with a sinister, shocking discovery that has been hidden from the world for decades.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’?

    • Scarlett Johansson as Zora Bennett
    • Jonathan Bailey as Dr. Henry Loomis
    • Rupert Friend as Martin Krebs
    • Mahershala Ali as Duncan Kincaid
    • Ed Skrein as Atwater
    • Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Reuben Delgado
    • Luna Blaise as Teresa Delgado
    • David Iacono as Xavier Dobbs
    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis and Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis and Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Other Movies in the ‘Jurassic Park’ Franchise:

    Buy Tickets: ‘Jurassic World: Rebirth’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy ‘Jurassic Park’ Movies On Amazon

    52IMk3HW
  • First Look at ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’

    hRdMPqbT

    Preview:

    • The first images of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ are online.
    • Scarlett Johansson, ‘Bridgerton’s Jonathan Bailey and Mahershala Ali lead the cast.
    • Gareth Edwards is in the director’s chair.

    While ‘Jurassic World Dominion’ in 2022 seemed to signal the end for the franchise that was spawned way back in 1993 with ‘Jurassic Park,’ turns out it was less of an extinction-level event and more of a brief pause between eras.

    Because, far from letting a cash dinosaur just wither into nothingness, Universal began making plans for another movie featuring giant beasties and the humans who want to help, hunt or otherwise avoid being snack food last year.

    What is now officially titled ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ has come together quickly, and now with shooting still in progress, we have the first look at some of the human characters including those played by Scarlett Johansson, ‘Bridgerton’s Jonathan Bailey and Mahershala Ali.

    Related News: New ‘Jurassic World’ Movie: Scarlett Johansson in Talks for Lead Role

    What’s the story of ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’?

    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis and Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards.
    (L to R) Jonathan Bailey as paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis and Scarlett Johansson as skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards.

    Here’s the official synopsis for the new movie:

    “Five years after the events of ‘Jurassic World Dominion,’ the planet’s ecology has proven largely inhospitable to dinosaurs. Those remaining exist in isolated equatorial environments with climates resembling the one in which they once thrived. The three most colossal creatures within that tropical biosphere hold the key to a drug that will bring miraculous life-saving benefits to humankind.”

    Who is who in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth?

    Mahershala Ali is Duncan Kincaid in 'Jurassic World Rebirth', directed by Gareth Edwards.
    Mahershala Ali is Duncan Kincaid in ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’, directed by Gareth Edwards.

    Johansson is playing skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett, contracted to lead a skilled team on a top-secret mission to secure genetic material from the world’s three most massive dinosaurs.

    When Zora’s operation intersects with a civilian family whose boating expedition was capsized by marauding aquatic dinos, they all find themselves stranded on an island where they come face-to-face with a sinister, shocking discovery that’s been hidden from the world for decades.

    Ali is Duncan Kincaid, Zora’s most trusted team leader

    iDV9ECfrlJVXq7MAkRW8k1

    Bailey (who will also be seen in Universal’s ‘Wicked’ this Thanksgiving) plays paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis.

    Rupert Friend (last seen in ‘Asteroid City’) appears as Big Pharma representative Martin Krebs.

    Manuel Garcia-Rulfo (‘The Lincoln Lawyer’) plays Reuben Delgado, the father of the shipwrecked civilian family.

    The cast also includes Luna Blaise, David Iacono and Audrina Miranda as Reuben’s family. And, as members of Zora and Krebs’ crews, Philippine Velge, Bechir Sylvain and Ed Skrein.

    Who is making ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’?

    'The Creator' director Gareth Edwards.
    ‘The Creator’ director Gareth Edwards.

    With longtime producers Frank Marshall and Patrick Crowley returning to shepherd the new movie (and original ‘Park’ director Steven Spielberg as an executive producer as usual), the first other major player hired was scriptwriter David Koepp.

    He, of course, wrote the first two ‘Jurassic’ movies, working from the concepts and characters originally created by novelist Michael Crichton.

    Directing this time is Gareth Edwards, who is best known for the likes of ‘Monsters’ in 2010, 2014’s ‘Godzilla,’ ‘2016’s ‘Rogue One: A Star Wars Story’ and, most recently, last year’s sci-fi pic ‘The Creator.’

    When will ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ be in theaters?

    Amblin and Universal have scheduled the new ‘Jurassic’ outing for release on July 2nd, 2025.

    'Jurassic World Rebirth' is directed by Gareth Edwards.
    ‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ is directed by Gareth Edwards.

    Other Movies in the ‘Jurassic Park’ Franchise:

    Buy ‘Jurassic Park’ Movies On Amazon

    k6WpleMa
  • ‘Westworld’ Cancelled After Four Seasons

    (L to R) Evan Rachel Wood and James Marsden in HBO's 'Westworld.'
    (L to R) Evan Rachel Wood and James Marsden in HBO’s ‘Westworld.’

    ‘Westworld’, which for four seasons has been delighting (and more often confounding) viewers with its complex, twisty storytelling and changing characters since it debuted in 2016, has been cancelled at HBO.

    Based on the 1973 film by Michael Crichton (who would go on to employ a similar idea of attractions causing trouble in his novel ‘Jurassic Park‘), ‘Westworld’ –– initially, at least –– told the story of a sprawling Western-themed park where humans could interact with complicated artificial people. And by interact, it usually meant either sleep with or kill.

    As the show went on, the canvas expanded to include different zones within the park with their own themes and the futuristic world outside of it, as the “hosts” –– the park’s creations –– broke out of their programming (and their restrictions) and began to plot a takeover of the human sphere.

    The show was created by Jonathan Nolan and Lisa Joy, with J.J. Abrams among its executive producers via his Bad Robot company. The cast included Evan Rachel Wood, Thandiwe Newton, Ed Harris, Jeffrey Wright, Tessa Thompson, Luke Hemsworth, Aaron Paul, Angela Sarafyan and James Marsden.

    An initial success –– its premiere drew the channel’s highest viewership since the debut of “True Detective” in 2014, it was initially buzzy, but its appeal began to wane slightly in later years, most notably after a big break in episodes due to the pandemic.

    Anthony Hopkins as Dr. Robert Ford in HBO's 'Westworld.'
    Anthony Hopkins as Dr. Robert Ford in HBO’s ‘Westworld.’

    Though HBO offered no official reason for the cancellation, there is already talk that it’s a combination of declining ratings (even without need of advertising revenue), with a precipitous drop between Seasons 3 and 4, and the hefty price tag for the show.

    An effects heavy head-scratcher, it featured expansive visuals of futuristic cities, a big cast and lots of artificial beings to bring to life.

    It’s no secret that HBO parent company Warner Bros. Discovery has been on a cost-cutting run of late, and while it still has big productions upcoming (such as ‘The Last of Us’), it has clearly decided that ‘Westworld’ was no longer worth producing.

    “Over the past four seasons, Lisa and Jonah have taken viewers on a mind-bending odyssey, raising the bar at every step,” HBO said in a statement. “We are tremendously grateful to them, along with their immensely talented cast, producers and crew, and all of our partners at Kilter Films, Bad Robot and Warner Bros. Television. It’s been a thrill to join them on this journey.”

    “Making ‘Westworld’ has been one of the highlights of our careers,” Nolan and Joy have remarked. “We are deeply grateful to our extraordinary cast and crew for creating these indelible characters and brilliant worlds. We’ve been privileged to tell these stories about the future of consciousness –– both human and beyond –– in the brief window of time before our AI overlords forbid us from doing so.”

    No shade there, then. Nolan and Joy, meanwhile are still at work on visions of the future –– they have a deal at Amazon, where they’re currently producing ‘The Peripheral’ and developing other projects.

    Ed Harris as The Man in Black in HBO's 'Westworld.'
    Ed Harris as The Man in Black in HBO’s ‘Westworld.’
    zO0EIM38
  • Jurassic World: The Ride is a Brilliant Reinvention of a Classic Attraction

    Jurassic World: The Ride is a Brilliant Reinvention of a Classic Attraction

    Universal Studios

    There has been a lot of talk, at least on a corporate level, about the ongoing “evolution” of Universal Studios Hollywood, the theme park perched on the side of a mountain, that exists cozily with a working movie studio. This talk began, in earnest, with the opening of the west coast version of the highly immersive Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and has continued with a number of projects, including the as-yet-unannounced Mario Kart attraction that is currently rising out of the ground on the lower lot, arguably the worst-kept secret in all of themed entertainment. But the word “evolution” was brought up a lot at last night’s dedication of the Jurassic World: The Ride attraction, an elaborate re-theme of the Jurassic Park: The Ride. As the park is evolving, so too must the ride.

    But honestly, what an evolution it is. Jurassic World: The Ride is a smart, scary, totally sophisticated update that keeps the fundamentals of the original attraction while upping the scares and the storytelling significantly.

    The original Jurassic Park: The Ride, was in development concurrently with the film, and was released, amazingly, just three years after the film’s release. Synthesizing elements of Michael Crichton’s best-selling novel (most notably the boat ride sequence) and Steven Spielberg’s paradigm-shifting blockbuster into a single, white-knuckle experience, it was, for many years, the high-water mark against what all other Universal attractions were judged. But recently the once-classic attraction seemed creaky, especially when, in 2015, “Jurassic World” was release, kick-starting a new, entirely separate leg of the franchise that the attraction had no relationship to.

    So, somewhat quietly, last year, the original attraction was shuttered and plans were unveiled to turn Jurassic Park: The Ride into Jurassic World: The Ride, with the updated attraction officially opening to the public a couple of weeks ago.

    And honestly, this is the most successful kind of redo — one that reminds you of the original ride (the track layout and, of course, that wicked drop, remain intact) while pushing things forward virtually everywhere else, like technologically and on a storytelling level.

    One of the greatest additions to the attraction happens early on, as you’re drifting through a newly-enclosed section of the ride. That’s when you meet the Mosasaurus, the giant aquatic dinosaur that was featured prominently in both “Jurassic World” movies. It’s also where you’ll first get wet — really wet. (The combination of practical effects and the animation work by Industrial Light & Magic is phenomenal.) From there, you get more of a story than you did the last time around, set up during the pre-show in the queue but really hammered home in the actual attraction. Instead of just something going wrong and the dinosaurs getting out, the Indominous rex escapes, which leads to other system failures, and a confrontation with the T. Rex. It both closely follows the events of the first movie and allows for a more immersive experience; you feel like you were at Jurassic World when things started to go haywire.

    What’s more, there are appearances by Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard in the attraction (and BD Wong in the queue), further adding to the immersion and deepening the storytelling. And the big show scene at the climax of the ride isn’t just a quick scare but an actual scene – you see a wonderful new animatronic of Pratt’s faithful Velociraptor sidekick Blue and huge, hulking figures of the Indominous and T. Rex. It feels like an altercation. And instead of simply seeing the T. Rex’s head, you see all of her.

    This was made, of course, even more intense at night.

    There will probably be die-hard Jurassic Park: The Ride fans out there, who will miss the old version of the attraction (don’t worry, it’s still in operation in Japan and Orlando). But this really is an improvement, start to finish. They’ve enclosed the ride at the right moments so your eyeline can no longer drift to the soundstages beyond and they’ve made everything scarier and more cohesive as a whole. The new animatronics are dazzling and actually seeing the characters from the movie in the attraction adds a lot. By the time Jurassic Park: The Ride said goodbye, it was old and tired and a nonessential part of your trip to Universal Studios. Now, with Jurassic World: The Ride, they have pumped some fresh blood into an ailing attraction and made a ride that everyone has to go on, even if you will end up soaking wet. Life, as Dr. Ian Malcolm once said, finds a way.

  • 15 Things You Never Knew About ‘Jurassic Park’ on its 25th Anniversary

    Watching “Jurassic Park” for the first time was like glimpsing into the future. So what does it say that this beloved Steven Spielberg movie is now 25 years old?

    The film, released on June 11 1993, changed the way we make movies. To mark that major milestone, and to pass the time until “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” hits theaters, here are some fun facts you might not know about “Jurassic Park.”
    1. Ian Malcolm’s line, “I think we’re extinct,” was a late addition to the script. In EW’s oral history of the film, back in 2013, the line’s origins started with dino supervisor Phil Tippet, who was brought on to oversee animating the dinos in stop-motion before ILM’s Dennis Muren presented his first CG animation test in wireframe form. “Steven asked me how I felt ­after seeing the footage,” Tippet revealed, “and I said, ‘I think I’m extinct.’ He said, ‘That’s a great line. I’m putting that in the movie.’

    2. Prior to directing “Jurassic Park,” Spielberg was working with writer Michael Crichton to develop a film version of “ER.” The two returned to the hospital-set project after “Jurassic Park” was released, turning it into a TV series instead.
    3. Despite the dinosaurs being the biggest selling point of the movie, “Jurassic Park” features only 15 minutes of actual dinosaur footage.

    4.Terminator 2” director James Cameron said that he wanted to direct “Jurassic Park,” but the film rights were sold before he had a chance to bid on them. Cameron has admitted that this was probably for the best, as his version would have been darker and more violent.
    5. One of the reasons Spielberg cast Ariana Richards as Lex is that she screamed so loudly and convincingly during her audition, that Spielberg’s sleeping wife woke up and ran into the room to see what was wrong.

    6. In one shot, one of the monitors at Nedry’s cluttered workstation can be seen playing the movie “Jaws,” also directed by Spielberg.
    7. One of the most difficult effects to achieve in the film was also among the simplest — the cup of water that vibrates when the T-Rex nears the tour. Special effects artist Michael Lantieri finally cracked the code by attaching the cup to a guitar string underneath the dashboard and pulling it.

    8. Julianne Moore was one of many actresses who tried out for the role of Ellie Sattler. She was instead cast as Sarah Harding in 1997’s “The Lost World: Jurassic Park.”
    9. Despite the fact that the Jurassic Park logo features a skeletal T-Rex, the T-Rex actually lived during the Cretaceous Period. Crichton admitted that he just picked the design because he thought it looked cool.

    10. The film establishes Ian Malcolm and John Hammond as polar opposites when it comes to scientific philosophy. That clash is even reflected in their respective costume designs, with Malcolm wearing all-black outfits and Hammond all-white.
    11. The film greatly exaggerates the size of Velociraptors for dramatic effect. However, during post-production, a new, larger species of raptor — called the Utahraptor — was discovered.

    12. Between his salary and back-end royalties, Spielberg earned a whopping $250 million from “Jurassic Park.”
    13. The dilophosaurus is never shown walking during its brief appearance as it attacks Nedry, as the puppeteers struggled to properly convey movement. Spielberg eventually decided that simply having the dilophosaurus appear next to Nedry was more effective.

    14. Both “Jurassic Park” and “Schindler’s List” were released in 1993, with Spielberg having to finish post-production on the former via videoconference while filming the latter. The process proved so grueling that Spielberg didn’t release another film for four years after.

    15. Laura Dern, who played Dr. Ellie Sattler, recalled in Entertainment Weekly’s recent oral history of “Jurassic Park” how Spielberg pitched her the movie: “I know that you’re doing your independent films, but I need you to be chased by dinosaurs, in awe of dinosaurs, and have the adventure of a lifetime. Will you do this with me?” Her “Wild at Heart” co-star Nicolas Cage, who said he’d always dreamed of being in a dinosaur movie, urged her to say yes.

  • 21 Things You Never Knew About ‘The Lost World: Jurassic Park’

    “It wasn’t as good as the first one. But it was very successful.”

    That was the assessment by Steven Spielberg himself of “The Lost World: Jurassic Park,” which marks its 20th anniversary on May 23, 2017. Indeed, the 1997 sequel may have prompted eye-rolling among fans, but it scared up a fortune at the box office, enough so that the franchise has continued to this day. Plus, it was the last time we got to see Jeff Goldblum‘s snarky scientist Ian Malcolm — at least until next summer’s “Jurassic World 2.”

    As smoothly as the production ran — Spielberg finished it on budget and ahead of schedule — there were still some surprises and jokes on the set. Read on for the dino-details.
    1. Michael Crichton called his “Jurassic Park” follow-up novel the only book he ever wrote that he knew would be made into a movie. He took inspiration from Arthur Conan Doyle, who’d written his own dinosaur novel in 1912 called “The Lost World,” and who had famously resurrected Sherlock Holmes after killing him off — a precedent Crichton used to justify bringing back Ian Malcolm, who had survived in the movie version of “Jurassic Park” but not in Crichton’s earlier novel.
    2. Even so, Spielberg and “Jurassic Park” screenwriter David Koepp ended up tossing a lot of Crichton’s plot and characters, though they kept a handful of key scenes, including the central set piece of mom-and-dad Tyrannosaurus Rexes attacking a trailer in order to rescue their wounded infant.
    3. The little girl attacked by tiny dinosaurs in the opening scene (above) is played by Camilla Belle. She and Vanessa Lee Chester (who played Malcolm’s daughter, Kelly) had both played supporting roles in Alfonso Cuarón‘s “A Little Princess.” Fittingly, Belle would grow up to star in prehistoric adventure “10,000 B.C.
    4. Early in the film, while Goldblum rides the subway, you can see a familiar-looking young man reading a newspaper. That’s future “Inglourious Basterds” co-star and “Hostel” director Eli Roth, who was an extra in several movies at the dawn of his Hollywood career.
    5. Koepp got the names for characters Roland (Pete Postlethwaite, above) and Van Owen (Vince Vaughn) from the macho rivals in one of his favorite songs, Warren Zevon’s “Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner.”
    6. Vaughn was all but unknown when Spielberg cast him. The director had first noticed him while watching a pre-release edit of “Swingers,” whose makers had passed it along to Spielberg in order to get his approval to borrow the “Jaws” theme music. Vaughn would also co-star in 1997 indie drama “The Locusts” with Kate Capshaw (Spielberg’s wife) before “Lost World” introduced him to a mass audience.
    7. While many shots in the film make use of advances in CGI that had occurred in the four years since “Jurassic Park,” close-up shots of menacing carnivores were accomplished as before, with animatronic creatures built by monster-effects wizard Stan Winston.
    8. The two T-Rex parents he built were so massive (19,000 pounds each — and they were just head-and-torso) that they couldn’t leave the soundstage, and sets had to be built around them. They were mounted on carts that ran on fixed tracks.
    9. The crew had the most fun staging the T-Rex tracks’ attack on the trailer, creature designer Shane Mahan recalled.

    “At first, we were hesitant, thinking that we had to be careful with the rigs. But it got to the point where we were just, ‘Ah, to hell with it,’ and we just demolished that trailer with the T-Rex rigs,” Mahan said. “That scene wasn’t faked. Those T-Rexes were really slamming into that thing, breaking glass and shaking it. I think the scene really works because we went for it like that. You can tell that something truly violent is happening.”
    10. The cliff over which the damaged trailer dangles was built out of a parking garage on the Universal Studios lot.
    11. Most of the outdoor footage was shot in the redwood forests of Northern California. Yeah, in real life, there are no redwood forests in Costa Rica, but the ancient, enormous trees gave the scenes the prehistoric look that Spielberg wanted.
    12. The sequence where velociraptors attack in the tall grass had to be planned a year in advance, in order for the seed sown by the production crew to grow tall enough. The crew planted eight full acres, in case scenes required multiple takes, since the grass, once trampled, wouldn’t spring back up.
    13. The screenplay’s original ending had the humans fleeing the island in helicopters while being attacked by pteranodons, but the flying lizards wouldn’t get their due on screen until “Jurassic Park III.” 14. The idea of ending the movie with a T-Rex attacking San Diego came from Conan Doyle’s novel, whose finale brought a pterodactyl to London, and from Spielberg’s delight at the idea of making his own little “Godzilla” movie and seeing a T-Rex drinking from a swimming pool.
    15. How did the crew of the ship get eaten if the T-Rex was still locked in the cargo hold? Apparently, there was supposed to be a scene showing raptors aboard the ship, but it was never filmed.
    16. The “Godzilla” gag isn’t at all subtle, except for the fact that one of the fleeing Japanese businessmen is saying, in Japanese, “I moved from Tokyo to get away from all this!” At least the filmmakers dropped their early idea of printing out that punchline in subtitles.
    17. Koepp (above) has a cameo as “Unlucky Bastard,” who is eaten by the runaway T-Rex during the San Diego sequence.
    18. We still get a kick out of those blink-and-you’ll-miss-’em posters for imaginary movies in the San Diego video store: Tom Hanks riding a surfboard in something called “Tsunami Sunrise,” a giant Robin Williams holding a tiny family in his palm in “Jack and the Beanstalks” (a hint toward the “BFG” adaptation in Spielberg’s future?), and Arnold Schwarzenegger in Shakespeare’s “King Lear.”
    19. The budget of “Lost World” was reportedly $73 million, just $8 million more than “Jurassic Park” had cost in 1993.
    20. “Lost World” set box office records when it opened. Its $72.1 million opening weekend was the biggest ever at the time and held the record until “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” surpassed it four and a half years later. It was also the fastest film to cross the $100 million mark, doing so in just six days. It ultimately earned less over the course of its run than “Jurassic Park,” racking up $229 million in North America and $619 million worldwide. Still, it remained the top grossing movie for most of 1997, until “Titanic” opened in December.
    21. It’s no wonder Spielberg followed “Lost World” with dialogue-heavy dramas “Amistad” and “Saving Private Ryan.” “It made me wistful about doing a talking picture because sometimes I got the feeling I was just making this big silent-roar movie,” he said of “Lost World.” “I found myself saying, ‘Is that all there is? It’s not enough for me.’”

  • How Jonathan Nolan & Lisa Joy Built a Bleaker, Badder ‘Westworld’

    Premiere Of HBO's "Westworld" - ArrivalsIs Westworld an amusement park, or an abusement park?

    That’s the question at the center of HBO’s sumptuous new sci-fi series, based on the increasingly prophetic 1973 movie written and directed by novelist Michael Crichton, in which he first explored the topic of a cutting-edge public playground where the amusements — this time in the form of cowboys rather than “Jurassic Park‘s” dinosaurs — wreck havoc.

    In the new “Westworld,” however, the human guests may pose far more danger to the AI hosts, acting out on some of their cruelest, most debasing impulses against the mechanized inhabitants of a realistically recreated Old West environment. But what happens if the artificial entertainments suddenly become knowingly and painfully aware of their treatment, both good and horrible?

    Screenwriters Person of Interest”) and Pushing Daisies,” “Burn Notice”), who also happen to be husband and wife, have teamed with executive producer J.J. Abrams and an all-star cast — one that includes Anthony Hopkins, Evan Rachel Wood, Ed Harris, Thandie Newton, and James Marsden — on the project, bringing a disquieting and increasingly existential twist to the original setup, as they revealed to Moviefone. “The original film is about humans trapped in a theme park with robots running amok,” says Nolan. “Our show is about robots trapped in a theme park with humans running amok.”

    Moviefone: When you both sat down with this project in mind and looked at Crichton’s work, tell me what started popping in your brain as to the things you wanted to figure out what to do with and the way you wanted to go in different directions.

    Lisa Joy: When I first agreed to do the project, to be totally honest, I hadn’t seen the movie yet. And I didn’t know if I should see it at that point, because we’d already started talking to J.J., and just the concept of, it’s a theme park with robots where you can go and do whatever you want — I thought, “My God, that’s genius!”

    And it is genius. Crichton is genius. The possibilities of new types of characters that I hadn’t seen before in Western or sci-fi started fumbling around in my head and in our conversations. I was just really excited to explore that. Now, Jonah had seen the movie.

    Jonathan Nolan: I’d seen the film as a kid, yeah. It scared the crap out of me. I still have issues with Yul Brynner. The original film is so cool. Crichton directed it — wrote and directed it when he was 30 years old — it was his directorial debut, and it’s so packed with ideas. Even watching them again, it’s so hard to understand how much he was thinking about the future.

    One good example is, at one point, there was a passing reference in there, when the chief scientist of the park is trying to figure out what’s going wrong with the robots. There’s glancing reference to, it’s spreading between them like a virus. You can kind of roll your eyes, and you’re like, “Right, a computer virus.” I went back and looked into it: he wrote it in ’72/’73, and the first computer virus didn’t appear until ’74. So here’s a guy who’s anticipating — and that’s a pretty big idea, the idea of a virus might be applicable to digital creation.

    So the original film is packed full of ideas. It’s breathless. And that was Crichton all over: so brilliant and so many ideas, and he barely had a chance to explore them. I’ve worked in film and TV. Film is good for some projects. What was so attractive for us about this as an episodic piece of storytelling was the ability to really dig deep into that question of consciousness, of artificial consciousness.

    That key insight about starting with the host’s perspective and kind of coming into it with the guests, I think, really unlocked the experience for us. I love stories and storytelling that involves some limitation on the protagonist’s understanding of the world, and this is a really fun one. They’re not allowed to remember the things that happen to them. They’re not allowed to see the cracks in their world. The joke is on them. And watching them not only come to consciousness, but also come to the realization of where they really are and what they’re really designed to do, is a really cool journey.

    The idea that our technological offspring might pose some problems for us has been around in different forms, from “Frankenstein” to “Blade Runner.” In this day and age, what were the issues that really caught your attention that you wanted to explore, to express in a literal or allegorical way?

    Joy: We often talk about the show as an examination of human nature. I think one facet of that is these AI are creatures of our creation. We are their mothers and fathers. That’s a way of looking at it. So you start thinking about what their characterizations mean as merit to us. If they do bad, if they do good, if they are innocent, that’s part of what we fed them. That’s part of what we put into them. So in that way, it’s a mirror into our own psyches.

    I think now, as we’re developing these actual technologies, the thing is, just like with an actual child, you hopefully — I think, if you’re a good parent — want your children to be better than you, in every way. More moral, more happy, more kind, more giving. At least that’s how I believe. But they don’t get that if you don’t code that. And you won’t code that if you yourself don’t feel that. So it’s about inputs and responsibility of what inputs we feed these synthetic children.

    Is there an aspect of that equation for you, Jonah, that also kind of kept itching at the back of your brain?

    Nolan: Yeah, very much. For me, we’ve seen an awful lot of film and television that considers this question from the sort of pejorative or dystopian perspective. The AI is going to kill us or enslave us. I, for a long time, have been more interested in looking at it from the other perspective of, “What will they think of us? What will they make of us?” In the same way that when you have a child, you begin to wonder what they think of you.

    You begin to think about what you do, and the work that you do, and how you behave, and how you hold yourself, how you comport yourself from your child’s perspective. You find yourself getting upset or using bad language. You change. So I’m fascinated by this proposition of what they will learn from us, take from us, and whether they will want to be human.

    And everyone involved in this project and everyone watching this project has the same limitation, which we are all human beings. And [Anthony Hopkin’s] character, Ford, talks about this in a later episode: we only have human consciousness, it’s the only yardstick we know for consciousness. But it is clearly very flawed. Look at the world around you. We’re far from perfect. So these creatures looking at us and wondering, do we have to be like them? They made us like them, do we have to remain that way? It’s one of the questions we wanted to ask.

    With a project like this, with hopefully a long future ahead of it, a lot of the heavy lifting has to be done creating the mythology. Tell me about the fun of that, the challenge of that, and maybe where your friend J.J. Abrams, who knows his way around that came in and sprinkled his little spices along the way.

    Nolan: You know, we joke about the obvious analogy to “Game of Thrones” — very different shows, but we looked at “Game of Thrones” as a model for, how do you do a big-scope television show — in a lot of ways, in terms of the scope and ambition of the storytelling, but also the production value?

    Obviously, we have the original film, which has so many brilliant ideas in it, but we don’t have the novels. We don’t have George R. R. Martin and the books. So our joke has been that part of the season in writing this thing was, “First we write the novels, then we adapt them internally.” That’s been daunting, but a lot of fun. A great deal of fun. There are so many places this story can go.

    Joy: There’s so many. I remember when we were first breaking it, Jonah and I, we just had our first child. Actually, we started breaking it even before when I was still pregnant. We would work in my office at home, and we had all these pages and pages that we would write on and scribble on, and then stick to the wall. And by the time it was done, all four walls were just totally covered in pages with like arrows to here and interconnecting different things and different characters we were exploring, and backstories.

    We wanted to really have an understanding of which characters — it was at that point that all the characters were coming alive for us, and we were exploring all that. We got through some of that in the first season, but we actually thought far beyond that into the next few seasons. With the kind of middle point and even an end point to it. So we did a lot of initial thinking about the mythology, and it helped us, I think, even if we haven’t gotten to some of that yet. It helped informed how we write what we’re writing now.

    There’s something analogous to your jobs as writers as to what some of your characters are doing in this show. You sometimes have to torture a character for drama. Sometimes you fall in love with characters you write and you don’t want to do these things to them. Can you talk a little bit about that element of transference from your life to this fantasy world?

    Nolan: Yeah, there was a great moment when a couple of our actors were rehearsing a scene. They said, “We finally figured out what this is like.” They were like, “This is us. This is what we do. This is you. You’re the writers, and you tell us what to do.”

    I’m not typically drawn to workplace dramas, and I don’t think what we do is terribly interesting, which is why we tend to write about things that are in genre, in terms of the writing and producing and the directing. But there is a little bit of a crossover here, and more than a little bit of an analogy between the creative work that’s going on down below, and the narratives that are being lived out up above.

    I hasten to point out that Simon Quarterman‘s character, Lee Sizemore, the writer, bears absolutely no resemblance to any writers that we may know or worked with over the years, whatsoever!

    “Westworld” premieres Sunday, October 3rd, on HBO.

  • Why Evan Rachel Wood’s ‘Westworld’ Role Is Her ‘Favorite Character’ Ever

    When we first met actress Once and Again.”

    Times change: Today, Wood’s a 29-year-old single mother herself, with a knockout resume of prestigious TV and film projects to her credit, including “True Blood,” and “Mildred Pierce,” and her return to series television is as high-profile as it gets, playing a consciousness-gaining android “host” used and frequently abused in the artificial Old West setting of “Westworld,” HBO’s ambitious, lavishly produced reimagining of novelist and filmmaker Michael Crichton‘s increasingly prescient 1973 sci-fi film.

    The role of Delores offers Wood an unparalleled acting opportunity, playing first the Old West reality — and realities — that the character experiences, then her experiences as an artificial being tended to in the futuristic behind-the-scenes environs, and at least the provocative middle ground, as Delores develops the beginnings of an awareness of who and what she really is. And the actress has enthusiastically embarked on the journey, with all of its promising and potentially frightening philosophical and existential implications, as she revealed to Moviefone in a candid conversation.

    Moviefone: As an actress, when you get a role who is a synthetic creation but is also starting to feel real emotion, where do you start to try to get into the head of that type of really unique character, something that you don’t encounter in everyday life?

    Evan Rachel Wood: Actually, I’m really into Ray Kurzweil and read “The Singularity Is Near, and that really just explores the inner workings of AI. I put a lot of that into play with how I approach Dolores, and watched every TED Talk and spoke to some futurists. Because it’s just a completely new way of approaching a character. Especially because she’s very much like almost three different characters at once, because she has many different modes.

    So, in character, she’s this very innocent prairie girl, this princess / damsel in distress, but underneath that, she’s actually a very advanced, intelligent being, with kind of unlimited power. The question is: What would happen if she realized she had that power? I think that’s something we’re going to be kind of exploring as the show goes.

    It was interesting not knowing what my character arc was going to be, and where the show was going, and finding out, episode by episode. It’s a good thing that my role, for at least the first half, is very much in a state of confusion, because that’s how I felt most of the time. She’s my favorite character I’ve ever played thus far, for sure.

    What was the first element of this project that initially got its hooks in you?

    I met with Lisa [Joy] and Jonathan [Nolan] [the co-creators of the re-imagining], and they explained to me how the park worked, and the possibilities, and I realized that it was so much more than just a theme park gone awry and robots malfunctioning. They were taking it so much deeper than the original film, and it was a real exploration on humanity and how these technologies are actually real, and are being worked on right now. When film was originally made, it was a little more science fiction, and now it’s unsettling because it can all very well happen.

    So that intrigued me, and just the idea of having an immersive experience in a world where there were no rules and no consequences. With the incredible cast — and I just knew that everyone working on it was at the top of their fields. Going into it, there’s just this energy of, “This is going to be the one. This is going to be the one that everyone wants to be remembered for.”

    So I’m just grateful every day that I go to work that I’m a part of something that seems less like a TV show, and more like a revolution. So really everything about it. I knew when I signed on, I signed on to a really cool show, and that it was going to be good, but it wasn’t until about Episode 4 that I started having a panic attack. I was overwhelmed by the quality and the writing, and realizing more and more the character they’ve entrusted me with was just kind of mind-blowing. So I’m just excited for people to really see what it’s about.Evan Rachel Wood and Ed Harris in HBO's WESTWORLDAs the actor who puts on the wardrobe and gets to work in the show’s different contexts, do you prefer the frontier element of it, or do you prefer the sci-fi world of it?

    It’s funny, I actually prefer the frontier! I was raised in the South, and I’ve been horseback riding my whole life, so it’s a scene that I’m very comfortable in. So I like it. I’m a desert child.

    With all the research you did, what are you excited about or intrigued about as far as the future of AI and what’s right around the corner?

    I was really terrified of it at first, and there were some theories of how, eventually, we will be obsolete and AI will surpass us. I thought, “What does that mean for the future of art and love and emotions? Will things be real anymore? Will they be sterile and cold?” There are some theories that they’ll be so much better than we are. Better problem solvers, all the petty problems we get snagged on will be nothing to them, and the art that they’ll create is so beyond our comprehension, and the empathy that they will feel will be so much bigger, and the capacity for love will be so much larger.

    So that made me feel a little better, I was like, “Oh, okay — actually the world is going to be a better place,” but it also made me terrified as a human being, because that means we will eventually be apes to AI, and they’re going to decide our fate. I feel like that’s kind of where the show is picking up. It’s a terrifying thought. I think that’s why the show sticks with you a lot.

    There’s a common commentary about the generation who’ve grown up immersed in technology are in some way disconnected from people because of that technology. You’ve made the point that you’re actually more connected to people, which I agree with: there are people in my life that 20 years ago I would have had to go to great effort to stay connected to. So tell me about what you see as the positives of the connectivity that the technology has provided us.

    Yeah, there’s so many possibilities. We have more power in the palm of our hand than the president of the United States had, maybe, 20 years ago. So the information and the knowledge out there at our fingertips is so vast and amazing, but yeah, with that comes also the dark side. Your kids are vulnerable, and also vulnerable to propaganda, and to just negativity, and all that’s there. So the world that we’re leaving for them is really interesting. It’s hard to keep things from children and to protect them.

    But at the same time, I do feel like it can be used for good, and it’s kind of our job to steer them in the right direction. I don’t think at this point we could keep it from them. I think we have to learn how to work with it and angle it the right way. But, as a mom, I think about that, because I think I stopped at around Nintendo 64, and that’s as far as I got, and iPods and anything else was just too much. My three-year-old can already work my iPhone better than me. So I’m curious to see what they’re going to do with that kind of power.

    What do you like about the allegorical quality of science-fiction storytelling in this particular instance? The bigger things that you guys are saying about life and humanity and AI.

    It’s holding up such a mirror to who we are as a species and what we find entertaining, and why we are so broken and why we are so disconnected from each other. I think using this platform to explore that and to create beings that see humanity in an objective way, hopefully will make us look at ourselves in the same vein, and hopefully think about a few things.

    Assuming there’s not actual technological breakdown issues, would you want to visit a “Westworld” -style place? Not necessarily to like have carte blanche in your behavior, but to be in that immersive experience.

    You know, it’s part of the human blessing and curse, that curiosity. I went to that place, Sleep No More, which is an immersive choose-your-adventure theater experience, and I was obsessed. I went seven times. I ended up in the play, and I fell in love with the characters and the narratives, and something about it just took over and there was something so satisfying about being so immersed in a different world, and getting to leave yourself at the door.

    So I think I would be drawn to it, but I think it would definitely terrify me. Especially after doing this show. It’s that old Michael Crichton/Jeff Goldblum saying, “Life finds a way.” There would be human error, and there’s always cracks in codes. With some things as intelligent as these hosts, I just feel like you would always be kind of at risk.

    Did you find any kind of parallel between the role of the hosts in this story and being an actor, being somebody who’s in service of material?

    What’s so funny is, we were filming one day doing another scene where the hosts are being put through these horrific things, and people are being entertained by our pain and our emotions. Someone went, “How messed up is it that these people are getting pleasure out of watching you cry?” And I thought, “That’s what I do. That’s my job.” Like, I know what it’s like to be sort of like a doll and dressed up and told to do things. For entertainment, I put myself through these horrific experiences. So I certainly relate to it on a deep level, yes.

    Having been in this business since you were a kid, and having been connected to so many high quality productions, what are you looking for now? What are the things that get you excited, professionally, as you sort through and try to figure out what the next project is going to be?

    I want to say, I feel so spoiled after doing this show, because nothing is ever going to feel as good. I’m just looking for revolutionary, groundbreaking roles, and better roles for women. I’ve started writing. It’s just kind of slim pickings out there. I just feel like you have to make your own things at this point and not wait for them to just come to fruition. So I’m hopefully going to start directing and making my own things. That’s hopefully where this is headed.

    Looking for projects that offer good roles for women — I mean, I know that there’s more now than there were —

    Yes.

    — but it’s still a struggle, and even this show is a commentary on that. You see the place of a woman in the historical context that “Westworld” is trying to recreate, but also the way that people treat the female hosts in that context. So where are you hoping to take material in what you generate for yourself?

    Well, what’s cool about the show is that it’s a reimagining of the 1800s, so there is that element, but the men hosts are getting just as abused as the women, and women can also come to Westworld and change their story, and they can be Dirty Harry if they want. They can be in the saloon with the girls and at the poker table, you know. There’s no rules. So there’s something really interesting about that to me.

    I feel like Westworld is one of the few places that it truly feels like an even playing field, and everything’s very fluid, and there’s gender equality. No one is safe, really. So all of that’s there, but it is also very much there for the men. So I feel like we’re already taking it a step in sort of changing that template. It doesn’t feel like it’s beating you over the head with it on the show either. It just is. It’s just how the world is set up.

    But it’s also okay to acknowledge that it is a bit more of an epidemic when it comes to women, and I think that is another theme that we’re showing on the show, and why that is, and why that’s entertaining.

    I’ll close out with noting it’s been a long time since you’ve been a regular on a TV show.

    Yeah!

    What did you love about it then, and what did you rediscover you loved about it now?

    I love being able to get so involved with a character. When you’re with a role like that for so long, you just know it inside and out. So I feel like I’m the best actor on TV because you have a chance to really sit with the material and dissect it, year by year, and tell — you have the time to tell epic stories. So I love it. I really love it. And I love HBO. They’ve just been so good to me. They feel like family at this point. So it’s great — it’s really great.

  • ‘Twister’: 10 Things You (Probably) Didn’t Know About the Summer Blockbuster

    375181 02: 1996 BILL PAXTON AND HELEN HUNT AS JO HARDING IN THE ACTION THRILLER "TWISTER"Released 20 years ago this week (on May 10, 1996), “Twister” wasn’t just a blockbuster special-effects spectacle that made viable movie stars out of Helen Hunt an Bill Paxton.

    It was also the “Apocalypse Now” of weather-themed disaster movies. The film’s production was marked by severe injuries to the stars and crew, a runaway budget, and the cinematographers openly rebelling against the director. Here are the real-life twists you didn’t hear about from the tornado drama’s tempestuous shoot.
    1. The “Twister” screenplay is credited to “Jurassic Park” novelist Michael Crichton and his wife, Anne-Marie Martin, but it was revised by such celebrated script doctors as Joss Whedon (who dropped out of the project because he contracted bronchitis), Steven Zaillian (who dropped out because he was leaving for his honeymoon), and Jeff Nathanson, who was on the set and kept rewriting the script until the end of the shoot.

    2. Helen Hunt was director Mad About You,” before the end of August 1995. Fortunately, “Mad” producer/co-star Paul Reiser offered to push back the start of the show’s production by two and a half weeks to accommodate “Twister” overruns.
    3. Jami Gertz won the role of Paxton’s hapless fiancée because Mira Sorvino (soon to win an Oscar for “Mighty Aphrodite“) refused to go brunette.

    4. Plagued by sunny weather, the production used bright lamps to reduce the exposure and make the skies look dark and stormy. But the lamps blinded Paxton and Hunt (“These things literally sunburned our eyeballs,” Paxton recalled), and they had to wear dark glasses and take eye drops for several days until they recovered.

    Paxton and Hunt also took lumps from being pelted with ice chunks in the hailstorm scene. The two leads had to take hepatitis shots after their scene wallowing in a filthy ditch. In that same sequence, Hunt kept banging her head on a low bridge because she would stand up too quickly, and she also was hit in the head by a truck’s open passenger door in the cornfield sequence. De Bont told Entertainment Weekly, “I love Helen to death, but you know, she can be also a little bit clumsy.” Hunt, who blamed her accidents on exhaustion from the difficult shoot, replied, “Clumsy? The guy burned my retinas, but I’m clumsy.”5. Tensions flared between de Bont and cinematographer Don Burgess‘s camera crew. They complained that de Bont would get upset when they couldn’t turn on a dime and set up new shots on a moment’s notice; he countered that the unpredictable weather meant the shooting schedule had to be flexible. The crew considered getting T-shirts made emblazoned with de Bont’s favorite curse-word phrase, “F—ing Hell S—.” The breaking point came when a camera assistant walked into the frame and ruined a complicated shot involving noisy wind machines, leading de Bont to shove the man into a mud puddle. Burgess and 20 crew members walked. The film was only five weeks into production.

    6. De Bont replaced Burgess with veteran cinematographer Jack N. Green. Unfortunately, Green was hospitalized with a back injury when a house rigged to collapse did so while Green was still inside it. With two days left to shoot, de Bont took over camera duties himself.
    7. Much of the film was shot in Wakita, Oklahoma, where producers purchased and then leveled eight blocks of existing houses, as well as flattening 30 homes built for the shoot. According to the Twister Museum in Wakita (which contains props and memorabilia from the movie), the filmmakers’ destruction of the town was so convincing that a third-party video crew flying overhead saw the fake devastation from the air and landed their helicopter to investigate.

    8. With the lengthy and tumultuous shoot, the need for twice as many effects shots as anticipated (because of the uncommonly clear skies), and late re-shoots that added the prologue about Jo’s childhood, the budget swelled from $70 million to a reported $92 million. But “Twister” grossed $242 million in North America, becoming the second biggest movie of 1996 (only “Independence Day” earned more). Worldwide, the tornado tale sucked up a total of $494 million.
    9. “Twister” was nominated for two Oscars, for Best Visual Effects and Best Sound. It was also nominated for two Razzies, including Worst Supporting Actress (for Gertz, pictured). The Crichtons won the Razzie for Worst Written Film Grossing Over $100 Million.

    10. “Twister” was the first mainstream Hollywood movie released on the then-new home video medium of DVD.

    %Slideshow-380604%