Tag: merritt-wever

  • Movie Review: ‘Christy’

    Sydney Sweeney in 'Christy'. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.
    Sydney Sweeney in ‘Christy’. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.

    Opening in theaters November 7 is ‘Christy,’ directed by David Michôd and starring Sydney Sweeney, Ben Foster, Merritt Wever, Katy O’Brian, Ethan Embry, Jess Gabor, and Chad L. Coleman.

    z1lQ7f330vbgvGB5rGf7j7

    Related Article: First Images of Sydney Sweeney and Amanda Seyfried in ‘The Housemaid’

    Initial Thoughts

    Sydney Sweeney in 'Christy'. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.
    Sydney Sweeney in ‘Christy’. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.

    There are two films out now based on the true stories of professional fighters: one, ‘The Smashing Machine,’ focuses on its subject (MMA fighter Mark Kerr) and his addiction, while the other, ‘Christy,’ chronicles the career of the first major female boxer, Christy Martin (Sydney Sweeney), as well as her abusive marriage to her trainer and manager.

    ‘The Smashing Machine’ doesn’t follow the usual biopic route, hopping through random moments in Kerr’s life in kaleidoscopic fashion but leaving us wondering just who he really was. ‘Christy’ follows the standard biopic formula – the rise, fall, and rise again of its subject in linear fashion – and while it doesn’t break the mold of those tropes, it’s ultimately the more affecting film because of its protagonist, her resiliency, and two incendiary performances from its stars.

    Story and Direction

    (L to R) Sydney Sweeney and director David Michôd in 'Christy'. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.
    (L to R) Sydney Sweeney and director David Michôd in ‘Christy’. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.

    We first meet Christy Salters (later Martin) when she wins a local boxing match for the princely sum of $300 and a jacket. But her parents (Ethan Embry and a quietly vicious Merritt Wever) are more concerned with the rumors that their daughter is dating another local girl named Rosie (Jess Gabor as a fictionalized version of the real person). When Christy gets a call from a regional boxing promoter, it’s a chance to get some space of her own and learn whether boxing is really ‘her thing’ or not.

    Enter trainer Jim Martin (Ben Foster), who is at first dismissive of the idea of training a woman until he sees Christy knock a sparring partner out cold. Martin trains Christy and ultimately marries her, but her rocket-like rise to fame and fortune as the first major female boxing star is only matched by the increasingly controlling and abusive behavior of the toxic, tightly-wound Martin, who sees Christy as less a partner and soulmate and more a meal ticket he can shove around.

    Christy’s ascent, peak, and eventual downfall are documented by director David Michôd (‘Animal Kingdom,’ ‘War Machine’) in standard fashion. There are the early scenes of her going-nowhere life, her conflicts with family, training and fighting montages, and eventually financial and drug problems (Christy claims later that Martin got her addicted to coke to keep her under his thumb). There’s nothing exceptional about the way the story is structured and even the boxing scenes, while well-staged, don’t bring anything new to the table.

    What gives ‘Christy’ its power is the dark road it goes down in its second half, as the relationship between Christy and the malignant Martin curdles into something dangerous and climaxes in a sequence that is outright shocking. But the seeds for this are planted early on, and not just through the dynamic with Martin: so much of the movie shows how men – from her own loving but hapless father to boxing promoter Don King – condescended to Christy from the start. Martin tells her how to dress, how long her hair should be, and who she can talk to, but her family tells her who she can date and King tells her to sign a contract without having a lawyer read it.

    Most biopics that follow the rise/fall/rise formula don’t have a person at their center who went through what Christy Salters when through – being left for dead both professionally and literally at one point. That things get to that point – and yet she manages to literally walk out of it all on her own two feet – gives ‘Christy’ an extra power that gives it an extra boost in a genre that’s been running on fumes for a while.

    Cast and Performances

    (L to R) Ben Foster and Sydney Sweeney in 'Christy'. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.
    (L to R) Ben Foster and Sydney Sweeney in ‘Christy’. Photo: Black Bear Pictures.

    Sydney Sweeney is a formidable young actor, and ‘Christy’ may be her best big-screen work to date. She is almost unrecognizable at first, but more than capably projects Christy’s drive, determination, and self-assurance, as well as her fear and inner vulnerability. Sweeney also handles herself quite well in the boxing scenes and bulks up a bit to create Christy’s physical presence. The wigs representing Christy’s hairstyles throughout the years may be the only flaw in her transformation here. Otherwise she is absorbing as this not always likable but still empathetic figure, and brings a raw level of pain to her work.

    Seeing Ben Foster’s name in a movie sends a signal that there is an extreme, often repressed and/or unpredictable character afoot, but he ups even his impressive intensity with his immersive work as the vile Jim Martin. From his wheedling initial manipulation of Christy to his later dead-eyed psychosis, Martin goes from distasteful to horrifying over the course of the story and is believable every step of the way. He and Sweeney could both be in the Oscar race if ‘Christy’ gains some traction.

    Merritt Wever (‘Nurse Jackie’) plays Christy’s homophobic mother Joyce with an enraging soft-spoken cruelty, while Katy O’Brian (‘Love Lies Bleeding’) delivers some welcome humanity and warmth as boxer Lisa Holewyne. Chad Coleman brings the comic relief as Don King, while we wish we saw more of Christy’s father as played by a sad-eyed Ethan Embry.

    Final Thoughts

    Sydney Sweeney at the 77TH EMMY® AWARDS, broadcasting live to both coasts from the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles, California, Sunday, Sept. 14, (8:00-11:00 PM, LIVE ET/5:00-8:00 PM, LIVE PT) on the CBS Television Network, and streaming on Paramount+.Photo: Francis Specker/CBS ©2025 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Sydney Sweeney at the 77TH EMMY® AWARDS, broadcasting live to both coasts from the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles, California, Sunday, Sept. 14, (8:00-11:00 PM, LIVE ET/5:00-8:00 PM, LIVE PT) on the CBS Television Network, and streaming on Paramount+.Photo: Francis Specker/CBS ©2025 CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    ‘Christy’ is a boxing picture from a different perspective. It’s not ‘Rocky’ or ‘Raging Bull.’ While the characters in those movies face considerable challenges, they are never denigrated for their sexuality or abused by a borderline psychotic narcissist and degenerate. Christy’s fate is sadly no different from that of so many other women – she just meets it in a profession and climate that is stacked against her.

    The movie leaves some questions unanswered: her wicked mother aside, did her father and brother try to intervene, or was she too afraid to tell them? What happened with Rosie, the only person who helped her in her darkest hour? The limitations of the format leave some plot threads unclear and condense a lot of the narrative’s action as it skips from ‘this happened’ to ‘that happened.’ But the bruising battle outside the ring is what ultimately makes ‘Christy,’ if not a knockout, a win on points all the same.

    ‘Christy’ receives a score of 80 out of 100.

    'Christy' opens in theaters on November 7th.
    ‘Christy’ opens in theaters on November 7th.

    What is the plot of ‘Christy’?

    Determined to win, Christy Martin (Sydney Sweeney) leaves behind her small-town roots and charges into the world of boxing under the guidance of her trainer and manager-turned-husband, Jim (Ben Foster). But her toughest battles unfold outside the ring — confronting family, identity, and a relationship that just might become deadly.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Christy’?

    • Sydney Sweeney as Christy Martin
    • Ben Foster as James V. Martin
    • Merritt Wever as Joyce Salters
    • Katy O’Brian as Lisa Holewyne
    • Ethan Embry as John Salters
    • Jess Gabor as Rosie
    • Chad L. Coleman as Don King
    • Tony Cavalero as James Maloney
    • Bryan Hibbard as Big Jeff
    zr1pEaOq

    Sydney Sweeney Movies and TV Shows:

    Buy Tickets: ‘Christy’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy Sydney Sweeney Movies on Amazon

  • Movie Review: ‘Memory’

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Opening in theaters in limited release on December 22nd before releasing wide on January 5th is ‘Memory,’ starring Jessica Chastain, Peter Sarsgaard, Merritt Wever, Josh Charles, Brooke Timber, and Jessica Harper.

    Initial Thoughts

    ‘Memory’ is a small and resolutely independent feature from writer-director Michel Franco, the Mexican filmmaker behind such provocative, frequently bleak films as ‘After Lucia,’ ‘Sundown,’ and the frightening, politically charged ‘New Order.’ With ‘Memory,’ he begins the film in a way that makes one think he’s heading down yet another dark path, but then takes an abrupt turn, making ‘Memory’ a movie that at least affirms the possibility that people can find love and hope again. Anchored by a fantastic cast, ‘Memory’ is a cinematic chamber piece that leaves one both haunted and moved.

    Story and Direction

    Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Sylvia (Jessica Chastain) is a single mother who works at a facility for developmentally disabled adults. She’s in recovery, regularly attends her AA meetings, and carefully monitors the activities of her teenage daughter Anna (Brooke Timber), to the point that Anna often spends nights away with her cousins at the home of Sylvia’s sister Olivia (Merritt Wever).

    Estranged from her own mother (Jessica Harper) and with a history of substance addiction and sexual abuse, Sylvia keeps as much of the world out as possible – locking the door and setting the alarm in her apartment, located in a gritty part of Brooklyn, without even thinking about it. But all that changes when she is convinced by Olivia to attend her high school reunion – at which a strange man abruptly seats himself next to her and then follows her home when she leaves.

    When she wakes up the next morning to find the man sleeping in the rain outside her building, Sylvia’s caretaker instinct takes over – and she soon learns that the man, Saul (Peter Sarsgaard), is a widower suffering from early onset dementia. He constantly loses track of where he is and what he’s doing, and lives with his brother Isaac (Josh Charles). But Sylvia thinks she remembers him from their high school days – and believes he was involved in some of the abuse she suffered in high school.

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    The truth turns out to be different than she thought, and no one is more surprised than Sylvia when she is asked by Isaac if she can work as Saul’s caretaker. As a result, their relationship takes a turn in an unpredictable direction – unpredictable because of Saul’s affliction and because these two people are walled off from the world in their own separate ways.

    Michel Franco presents the story and characters here in the same unflinching, minimalist fashion with which he carved out the more brutal horrors of ‘After Lucia’ and ‘New Order.’ The opening plays almost like a horror movie, as Saul unsettlingly follows Sylvia home for no discernible reason and to her mounting unease. Then when she confronts him about the past, there’s a sense that ‘Memory’ will turn into a dark psychological exercise. But Franco pivots again, and while ‘Memory’ does explore some disturbing material, the director finds a careful balance with a story of two people finding a connection and giving themselves a second chance at living again.

    The tone of ‘Memory’ rarely wavers, and each piece of Franco’s uncluttered script feels real and purposeful (it’s helped by the film’s real New York locations, which are almost all off the usual beaten track of filming in the Big Apple). This is a restrained movie, but the questions it raises about memory, forgiveness, and empathy are profound ones.

    Related Article:

    ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ Stars Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield Talk About Playing Tammy Faye & Jim Bakker

    The Performances

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Jessica Chastain, of course, is one of the finest actresses of her generation, and Peter Sarsgaard is quietly one of the best around as well, with both actors bringing a fierce intelligence and direct emotional wavelength to each performance they give. ‘Memory’ is no different: Chastain effortlessly swerves away from the showier work of her Oscar-winning turn in ‘Eyes of Tammy Faye,’ playing Sylvia with no makeup, drab clothing, and a muted style, as befitting a character who wants to retreat from the world. Yet you can feel the tension simmering within her, and when it reaches a boiling point during a jarring breakdown at her sister’s house, you realize just how much pain Sylvia has been carrying around.

    Sarsgaard, meanwhile, plays Saul as a man with a sort of film over him; every once in a while that film melts away and the real Saul – a kind, gentle, passionate man — breaks out like a ray of sunshine. It’s a subtle piece of work that avoids many of the cliches of playing someone with dementia that might show up in a lesser-written character. Yet you can see Saul struggling as he must literally live his life from moment to moment, while knowing that the blank spaces between those moments can lead to disaster.

    The rest of the small supporting cast is quite excellent as well, with Merritt Wever of ‘Nurse Jackie’ fame doing her usual outstanding work as Olivia, whose loving yet awkward relationship with Sylvia hides some terrible secrets. And as fans of ‘70s cult cinema classics ‘Suspiria’ and ‘Phantom of the Paradise,’ the sight of Jessica Harper is a welcome one, especially in a meatier role than she usually gets.

    Final Thoughts

    Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    This is a different kind of film for Michel Franco, and a refreshing change of pace for him. While it still probes into dark corners of human behavior, ‘Memory’ does strike a more positive chord in some ways. Yet even without its more tragic aspects, the film still makes one think about our own family dynamics, the way we conduct our lives, and our assumptions about others – not to mention the way we choose to remember (or forget) all of those. It’s a movie with incredibly subtle performances and few “big” moments, yet its characters and story stay with you – and can hit close to home.

    ‘Memory’ receives 8 out of 10 stars.

    bhmSzmBAL0KhIeeZz5rU23

    What is the plot of ‘Memory’?

    Sylvia is a social worker who carefully controls and schedules every aspect of her life, including her job, her regular AA meetings, and her interaction with her daughter. But an unsettling encounter at her high school reunion – with a man she thinks she remembers all too well – sets Sylvia on a course that will have her confront her own life choices and the memories she chooses to keep and let go.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Memory’?

    • Jessica Chastain as Sylvia
    • Peter Sarsgaard as Saul
    • Merritt Wever as Olivia
    • Brooke Timber as Anna
    • Josh Charles as Isaac
    • Jessica Harper as Samantha
    Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Other Jessica Chastain Movies:

    Buy Jessica Chastain Movies on Amazon

    jvDB44JR
  • ‘Memory’ Interview: Jessica Chastain and Peter Sarsgaard

    yCAOw5Pk

    Out now in theaters in limited release before expanding on January 5th is ‘Memory,’ directed by Michel Franco (‘New Order’) and starring Academy Award winner Jessica Chastain (‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’) and Emmy Award nominee Peter Sarsgaard (‘The Batman’).

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain star in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain star in ‘Memory.’

    Moviefone recently had the pleasure of speaking in-person with Jessica Chastain and Peter Sarsgaard about their work in ‘Memory,’ what they liked most about their complex characters, acting together for the first time, and the film’s indie esthetic.

    You can read the full interview below or click on the video player above to watch the interviews.

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Moviefone: Were either of you surprised that the same guy who wrote something as brutal as ‘New Order’ wrote something as empathetic and sensitive as this?

    Jessica Chastain: Well, I was always going to read the script because I really respect him as a filmmaker. But the wonderful thing is that he keeps everyone on their toes. I mean, even when you’re in a theater watching ‘New Order,’ you don’t know what’s going to happen, scene from scene. Same with ‘Memory,’ which could not be more of a different film. You don’t know where the characters are heading. You don’t know where it’s going. I think that’s so exciting about him is that I don’t know how he does it, but he’s able to write and create separate from any kind of cliche or idea of how things have to be done. I think because of that, there’s a great tension in this movie because you don’t know if it’s going to tip into darkness and what moment it could happen.

    MF: Your character Sylvia is a woman of many moving parts. What was the single thing, was there a single thing about her that really leapt out at you that made you want to play her?

    JC: Well, the main reason I wanted to do it was Michel Franco, and then when I got to know [Sylvia], I just loved her. This woman who experienced so much pain, who never really had anyone in her corner — I mean, even her sister, who pretends to be in her corner, judges her every single scene that they’re in together and sees her as inferior and a problem. Sylvia’s always seen as a problem. Yet, when you’re carrying that with you, that shame and that idea that you’re a problem to so many around you, she works as a social worker, and she checks on people. Even this man who follows her home, she checks to make sure he’s okay. She’s a good, good human being and I loved her for that.

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    MF: Peter, I read that your uncle had early onset dementia. How did his experience factor into your performance and did you also get other perspectives?

    Peter Sarsgaard: I would say that the main thing was that I was aware that it could hit at a young age. I mean, I was 51 or so when I made this movie, so I knew that it would not be unreasonable that I had the condition. My uncle was just such a positive person and somebody who didn’t want to be trouble to anyone else, so that the symptoms of his condition were around a long time even before he was diagnosed. So, I liked that, the idea of playing someone that doesn’t want to be the problem, that will do anything not to be the problem and is pursuing connection and joy and all of that. I don’t like equating [my uncle] with dementia, I like equating him with being Bubba, my uncle. I talked to other people that did have dementia on the phone, and that was helpful just in terms of reminding me that you don’t have to have to play dementia every single moment of the movie. You wouldn’t notice that some of these men had dementia if you talked to them.

    MF: Your character, Saul, comes across almost as if there’s this kind of slight film over him, and then he kind of breaks through and you see him, and he sees you.

    PS: Well, when I was playing it, I really felt like I was always trying to keep up with what was going on in a very focused way. It made me really look at other people and constantly try to remind myself of where I am in this moment. Then of course, I’m writing things down all the time. But as one of the guys with dementia told me, he was like, “Yeah, I write things down all the time, [but] I never look at what I wrote down,” which I think is also probably happening in the movie.

    Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    (L to R) Peter Sarsgaard and Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    MF: This is the first time the two of you have worked together and it just seems like that’s something that should have happened at some point over the years. You’re both kind of shapeshifters as actors. Is that what drew you to collaborating with each other?

    JC: This whole thing started because I just enjoy so much watching Peter’s work and for years I have, before I could ever get hired in Hollywood. So, I’ve always admired him in the way he tells stories. He doesn’t work from a sense of vanity. There’s no sense that he must change a story to fit him, to make him look a certain way. He’s willing to change himself to serve a story and to serve humanity, I think in doing that. So, I’ve always wanted to collaborate with him because I felt like that would be someone on set that I wouldn’t know what was going to happen. That’s the thing I admire most in another artist, but also the thing I look forward to when going to work.

    Related Article: ‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’ Stars Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield Talk About Playing Tammy Faye & Jim Bakker

    PS: My wife and I went to a pretty early screening of ‘Eyes of Tammy Faye’ and we were so moved that of course we went and found her as she was signing autographs outside because Jessica does sign every autograph for every fan. We think you’re amazing. It was such a joy to tell her — I love telling an actor when I’m really, really moved by one of their performances. I don’t just do it to everyone. So, when I heard that she was attached to this, I mean, it was exactly what I wanted to do at that moment.

    MF: How does going from the bigger machinery of studio productions — and in the case of ‘Tammy Faye,’ the makeup and all that — to a movie with no trailers, where you, Jessica, did go to the adult daycare center and put in some time there, how does having all the accoutrements sort of stripped away affect your performance?

    JC: Well, first, it doesn’t feel like a strange thing to me because I started in drama school and in theater. I was just on Broadway. I did my hair and makeup every single day. That’s just something you’re supposed to do in theater. So, there’s something about perhaps coming from theater and drama school where you are doing all of that yourself, which I love, because I love creating a character. I think the only thing that really feels that different is it feels like your feet are to the fire in a way that sometimes it’s not. Those bigger movies, you have an hour between setups, and it dissipates the energy and this, you never really allow that to happen. The very first day of shooting was an AA meeting, it was an actual AA meeting that everyone was sharing very personal things about their lives. You can’t show up and be like an actor in that scene. You must show up as an authentic version of who your character is and not stand out. I think it sounds more difficult, but for me it makes it easier because you don’t get an escape from the character.

    Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    PS: That’s right. I think I have an enormous amount of respect for people who can keep their feet really anchored on a big film that’s shooting for four and a half months somewhere. It’s a very specific skill. The way Michel set this up, it’s really, really for the actors. We control the tempo because there’s no cutting on the scenes. Everything is wide, usually from one angle, the whole scene. So that’s a lot of trust in your actors and when you’re acting with someone as talented as Jessica, as talented as Jessica Harper, as Josh [Charles] and Merritt Wever, it reminds me of sports actually — you know where the ball is all the time. It’s like those old theater games. We were really like a group because we had to rely on each other. It wasn’t going to be intercut. There are some shots that have six people in the same frame. If one of them is picking their nose and thinking about picking up their kids after school, then it doesn’t work.

    bhmSzmBAL0KhIeeZz5rU23

    What is the plot of ‘Memory’?

    Sylvia (Jessica Chastain) is a social worker who carefully controls every aspect of her life, including her job, her AA meetings, and her interaction with her daughter. But an unsettling encounter at her high school reunion – with a man (Peter Sarsgaard) she thinks she remembers all too well, yet who struggles moment to moment with his own memory – will lead Sylvia to confront her life choices and the memories she chooses to keep and let go.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Memory’?

    • Jessica Chastain (‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye’) as Sylvia
    • Peter Sarsgaard (‘The Batman’) as Saul
    • Merritt Wever (‘Marriage Story’) as Olivia
    • Brooke Timber (‘Russian Doll’) as Anna
    • Josh Charles (‘The Good Wife’) as Isaac
    • Jessica Harper (‘Bones and All’) as Samantha
    Jessica Chastain in 'Memory.'
    Jessica Chastain in ‘Memory.’ Photo: Ketchup Entertainment.

    Other Jessica Chastain Movies:

    Buy Jessica Chastain Movies on Amazon

    jvDB44JR
  • ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ Interview: Kathryn Hahn

    jJKKZrao

    Premiering April 7th on Hulu is the new series ‘Tiny Beautiful Things,’ which is based on the novel of the same name by Cheryl Strayed (‘Wild’), and is executive produced by Oscar winners Reese Witherspoon (‘Walk the Line’) and Laura Dern (‘Marriage Story’).

    What is the plot of ‘Tiny Beautiful Things?’

    Based on the best-selling collection by Cheryl Strayed, ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ follows Clare (Kathryn Hahn) a floundering writer who becomes a revered advice columnist while her own life is falling apart. When we first meet Clare, her marriage to her husband Danny (Quentin Plair) is barely limping along; her teenage daughter, Rae (Tanzyn Crawford), is pushing her away; and her once-promising writing career is non-existent.

    So when an old writing pal asks her to take over as the advice columnist Dear Sugar, she thinks she has no business giving anyone advice. After reluctantly taking on the mantle of Sugar however, Clare’s life unfurls in a complex fabric of memory, exploring her most pivotal moments from childhood through present day, and excavating the beauty, struggle, and humor in her unhealed wounds. Through Sugar, Clare forms a salve for her readers – and for herself – to show us that we are not beyond rescue, that our stories can ultimately save us, and, perhaps, bring us back home.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Tiny Beautiful Things?’

    ‘Tiny Beautiful Things’ stars Kathryn Hahn (‘Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery’) as Clare, Sarah Pidgeon (‘Gotham’) as young Clare, Quentin Plair (‘The Good Doctor’) as Danny, Tanzyn Crawford (’Servant’) as Rae, Merritt Wever (‘Michael Clayton’) as Frankie, and Michaela Watkins (‘Paint’) as Amy.

    Moviefone recently had the pleasure of speaking with Kathryn Hahn about her work on ‘Tiny Beautiful Things,’ what excited her about the role, Clare’s decision to become Sugar, and working with actress Sarah Pidgeon to create both versions of Clare as one seamless character.

    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu's 'Tiny Beautiful Things.'
    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu’s ‘Tiny Beautiful Things.’ Photo: Jessica Brooks/Hulu.

    You can read our full interview below or click on the video player above to watch our interviews with Hahn, Sarah Pidgeon, Quentin Plair and Tanzyn Crawford, and series creator Liz Tigelaar and author Cheryl Strayed.

    Moviefone: To begin with, what were some of the aspects of the character that you were excited to explore with this series?

    Kathryn Hahn: I was excited about her change, about her willingness, and about her courage to change. I was excited about really digging deep into how difficult it is to reframe and re-address how trauma lodges in someone. How hard it is, difficult it is to change as a human especially when you are in a long-term relationship, and especially when you’re a mother or when you’re defined as other things. That felt very compelling to me.

    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu's 'Tiny Beautiful Things.'
    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu’s ‘Tiny Beautiful Things.’ Photo: Elizabeth Morris/Hulu.

    Related Article: Aubrey Plaza Joins ‘Agatha: Coven of Chaos’

    MF: Can you talk about Clare’s decision to become Sugar and how that changes her outlook on life and her future?

    KH: I think that’s the inciting incident for her for all of this change. I think that she had always wanted to be a writer, and a lot of that happened to do with her mother’s desire for her to be a writer, her mother who had died when she was very young, and that certainly was a starting point for her. She thought she was unworthy of being a writer, unworthy of any of it because of the self-destruction she had done once her mother died. She kind of threw herself into a pretty nasty degree of self-harm, and so it was impossible for her to see that there was a track back. Then, this man from her past played by the amazing Zak Orth, kind of got her back on track with this opportunity anonymously. I think it was once she started reading the letters and saw the radical, blindingly naked vulnerability in these letters that compelled her. She had no choice but to answer back with her own nakedly vulnerable and honest self in a way that she even was not quite ready to examine in her own voice. It was only through her writing.

    Sarah Pidgeon as young Clare in Hulu's 'Tiny Beautiful Things.'
    Sarah Pidgeon as young Clare in Hulu’s ‘Tiny Beautiful Things.’ Photo: Elizabeth Morris/Hulu.

    MF: Finally, you share your role with actress Sarah Pidgeon, who plays the younger version of Claire. Did you work closely with her to create a seamless performance for the character?

    KH: Sarah Pidgeon is so extraordinary. We did not have much time to work together. I saw her amazing audition tape, and then she was cast. We had a very short workshop together, and that was basically it. She shadowed me, but I wish we had had more time. But she shadowed me, I think, for the first couple of episodes when we didn’t have as many flashbacks. She watched the monitor, and then it was off to the races, but the way you look at her, she had no idea who she was to become. She had no idea what her older self was going to be, so she was playing in this very raw emotional state, like the trauma had just happened. She was in the scene with her mom, so I was able to take a few things from her. 20 years is a long time, I’ve dyed my hair so many times since then, and I also shrank about a foot and a half. I feel like we were able to just seamlessly and wordlessly become one. Our transition seemed so seamless, and we would send each other poems and send each other pieces of music, and it was very nonverbal. I think it kind of worked in our favor because it was very important to me, and I think to Liz as well that it not feel like mimicry because, again, 20 years is a long time. So it just felt very organically and just perfect. I think she’s incredible.

    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu's 'Tiny Beautiful Things.'
    Kathryn Hahn as Clare in Hulu’s ‘Tiny Beautiful Things.’ Photo: Jessica Brooks/Hulu.

    Movies Similar to ‘Tiny Beautiful Things:’

    Buy Kathryn Hahn Movies on Amazon

  • Exclusive: See the Brand-New Character Posters for Robert Zemeckis’ ‘Welcome to Marwen’

    Exclusive: See the Brand-New Character Posters for Robert Zemeckis’ ‘Welcome to Marwen’

    Universal/ImageMovers

    Robert Zemeckis is the type of filmmaker known for grafting fantastical scenarios with utterly relatable characters. Just think about “Back to the Future,” “Forrest Gump,” “Contact” or “Cast Away” — these are movies in which the high concept doesn’t dilute the emotionality of the pieces, it amplifies them.

    Zemeckis’ latest combination of the down-to-earth and the otherworldly is “Melcome to Marwen,” the true-life story of a man (Steve Carell) who, following a violent attack, recreates a World War II village in his backyard, populating it with dolls that look like the people in his town (Leslie Mann, Diane Kruger, Janelle Monae, and Eiza Gonzalez). It looks totally enchanting and very, very Zemeckis-y. And we are so thrilled to debut the brand new character posters, ahead of tomorrow’s brand new trailer.

    The posters feature the doll versions of the aforementioned actresses (along with characters played by Gwendoline Christie, Merritt Wever and Zemeckis’ wife, Leslie Zemeckis), along with Carrell’s .

    “Welcome to Marwen” opens everywhere on December 21, 2018.

    Universal/ImaveMovers
  • ‘The Walking Dead’ Season 6, Episode 14 Recap: Should I Stay or Should I Go

    the walking dead, season 6, 614, denise, dr. denise cloyd, merritt weverA popular – and well-founded – complaint about “The Walking Dead” is that the show can’t stop repeating itself, perpetually introducing Big Bads that our survivors must battle in between brief moments of stability and community-building. And with the conflict with the Saviors heating up over the past few weeks, it certainly seems like viewers are in for a lather, rinse, repeat with Negan and co., which is why creating characters that audiences care about has become so important to the series. As I mentioned a couple weeks ago, “TWD” often strives to balance humor and heart with the series’s inherent horror, doing its best to make some room for lightness in the midst of all the darkness. But after tonight’s episode, I suspect the show has forgotten the importance of that.

    Sure, making us care so much about Denise means her death is that much more heart-wrenching. And yes, making Carol question her morality makes her a multifaceted (and normal) human being. But honestly, what’s the point? What is the point of killing someone as soon as they realize they need to – and want to, and try to – change? What is the point of banishing Carol yet again, making her relinquish her defining characteristics, and forcing her to take some moral high ground that viewers know is a recipe for disaster (and Carol herself would have scoffed at only a few episodes ago)? There doesn’t seem to be one, and I’m struggling to reconcile this apparent ambivalence on the writers’ part with my loyalty as a viewer.

    I really am crushed by the loss of Denise. She was my favorite new character this season, and Merritt Wever’s brilliant performance made the doctor a warm, awkward, funny, flawed, fully-fledged person who I enjoyed watching week after week. Wever is an Emmy winner and must have other acting opportunities on her plate, so I suppose her time in Alexandria was always meant to be brief. But the problem with introducing someone that viewers (or at least this viewer) love so much is that not only do they miss them when they’re gone, but they question the point of giving her character depth or dimension at all, when she ends up nothing more than target practice for the villain of the week. We’ve seen similar progression with killed-too-soon characters like Bob, whose upbeat demeanor made him a welcome presence on the program early last season. So naturally, after he tells Rick he believes this nightmare existence will get better, he’s bitten by a zombie and has his leg eaten in front of him by a band of cannibals. That’s what you get for having a personality on “The Walking Dead.” (Conversely, blank slates like Tara continue to roam free.)

    As for Carol, I don’t even know where to begin. I’m so angry about the direction the show is taking with her, but more than that, I’m confused. I outlined my annoyance with this nonsense last week, and I reiterate it tonight. I do find it kind of hilarious that she chose to break up with Tobin via letter (better than a Post-it, I guess?), but that’s where my tolerance for this storyline ends. When even Morgan, the biggest pacifist in the universe, is confused by your random change of heart, there’s a problem. If anything, Carol’s reasons for leaving only serve to highlight the flaw that I pointed out above: This series is seemingly nothing more than an endless string of antagonists that must be defeated. That Carol thinks Rick’s crew is becoming an antagonist itself is beside the point; the fact that she so easily distilled the predictable essence of the series in a few lines speaks volumes about how monotonous it’s become.

    “We have so much here: people, food, medicine, walls. Everything we need to live. But what we have, other people want, too, and that won’t ever change,” Carol writes in her letter. “If we survive this threat, then it’s not over. Another will be back to take its place, to take what we have.”

    That’s been true for six seasons, and with no end to the series in sight, I don’t know how it ever escapes that plot device. Sure, maybe I’m demanding more than I should from a show about the zombie apocalypse. But as I’ve said before, the showrunners have been determined to make “TWD” as much about the people as the walkers roaming around them. Unfortunately, with the good ones either dropping like flies or dropping their personalities, I’m finding it difficult to continue caring about the rest of them.

    And judging by precedent, it’s almost better if I don’t like a character – I thought the insipid Father Gabriel would die after two episodes, and yet he’s whimpered his way through almost two seasons. (Can’t wait for season 12, when he’s the only current cast member left alive and becomes the Rick of Alexandria 3.0.) That’s why I’m so nervous for Daryl and Eugene, who each had moments of self-actualization tonight that peg them as liable to bite the big one soon.

    Eugene insists to a skeptical (and weirdly hostile) Abraham that he considers himself a survivor now, someone who has finally successfully adapted to his apocalyptic environment. He suggests the innovative idea of making his own ammunition for the community, since that’s its most important commodity now, and has even started to grow out his signature mullet in a literal show of his development.

    “I see you tied back your Tennessee waterfall there,” Abraham remarks, adding another state-specific synonym for the haircut to viewers’ vocabulary. Eugene responds with perhaps the best hair-centric soliloquy known to man.

    “I won’t lie,” he says. “I liked it, I may very well miss it. The feel of the billowy curtain catching the breeze some days was straight-up bliss. But brass tacks, the hair doesn’t make the man – the man makes the man.”

    That latter sentiment weighs on Daryl, who’s tormented by his decision not to take out Saviors Dwight and Honey – who he met in the burned-out forest back in episode six, and who stole his bike and his crossbow – when he had the chance. He shares his frustration with Carol, who responds that he had no choice but to show mercy, because “That’s who you are. We’re still stuck with that.” “No, we ain’t,” Daryl spits back. “I should have killed them.”

    It’s this conversation that ultimately makes Carol realize that she needs to leave Alexandria. As best I can understand her warped logic, she seems to agree that it’s necessary to kill in this new world. But she doesn’t want to be in the position of having to do so, and thus decides to isolate herself indefinitely.

    “I love you all here, I do. And I’d have to kill for you. And I can’t. I won’t,” she says in her letter. “Rick sent me away and I wasn’t ever going to come back, but everything happened and I wound up staying. But I can’t anymore. I can’t love anyone because I can’t kill for anyone. So I’m going, like I always should have. Don’t come after me, please.”

    Of course, we know that someone – probably Daryl – inevitably will, and that pursuit will likely lead to someone (perhaps even Carol herself) getting killed, especially if the Saviors find her first. As we saw with Denise, Negan’s crew is apparently everywhere these days, circling closer and closer to Alexandria in an effort to find Rick’s gang, seeking revenge alongside a cache of weapons and people. We know that the Saviors like to introduce themselves to new communities by killing a random resident to instill fear and assert authority, and that was likely the plan for Daryl, the real target of Dwight’s arrow. Instead, it hits Denise mid-speech. But there’s no time to mourn, since Dwight and his henchmen have Daryl and Rosita surrounded, and then trot out a bound Eugene, who they’ve taken hostage.

    A flurry of activity follows, spurred in part by Eugene deciding that the best way to subdue Dwight is to bite him in the crotch (?!?), causing the Savior to howl out in pain and giving Daryl and Rosita a chance to scramble for their weapons and open fire. Abe, hiding nearby, joins the fight, and once Eugene releases Dwight’s junk from his jaws’ clutches, the Saviors bolt, leaving Daryl’s crossbow behind. Mr. Dixon, determined not to let Dwight get away again, takes aim, but Rosita talks him out of it. They need to attend to Eugene (only grazed by a bullet, thankfully – after surviving Abe’s season five beatdown, and now this, it seems this guy has nine lives), and hightail it back to Alexandria before they’re ambushed again. But you can bet that this isn’t the last time Dwight and Daryl go toe-to-toe. I’m just hoping that the writers have the sense to make Daryl the one who comes out on top in that matchup.

    Daryl eventually fetches Denise’s body from the train tracks, and brings it back to Alexandria for burial. He clutches the keychain she snagged from the apothecary, which is inscribed with her twin brother Dennis’s name. It’s a mirror of the earlier scene in which Denise herself held the trinket and wept outside the store, and each moment is heartbreaking in its own way. I suppose the only solace I can take away from this episode is that Denise (and Wever) got an incredible showcase for her last appearance on the program. Despite having no experience outside the walls, she summoned the courage to suggest that Daryl and Rosita join her to check out the apothecary, scoring some crucial antibiotics that will likely save Eugene’s life. Her triumph at finding that can of Crush to give to Tara was infectious, and her inability to keep down her breakfast was gross but endearing. (Loved her line, “Aw man, I threw up on my glasses.”) And her final moments proved that she was on the path to becoming a more assertive person – and more importantly, more confident in herself.

    After Rosita and Daryl chastise her for going after that soda – and tussling with that walker – when it was stupid dangerous to do so, Denise shoots back that it was stupid and dangerous for them to go after the Saviors, yet they did it anyway. “You wanna live, you take chances. That’s what I did,” she retorts. She also admits that she didn’t tell Tara she loved her, or join her on her supply run, because she was scared, something that she now realizes is silly in these zombified times.

    That’s what’s stupid, not me coming out here and facing my s—t,” Denise tells them. “And it makes me sick that you guys aren’t even trying, because you’re strong and you’re smart and you’re both really good people. And if you don’t wake—”

    And that’s when an arrow is shot through her head.

    It seems that Daryl gets the point, though, and Denise’s demise does make him wake up a bit. Just what change it will inspire in him is forthcoming, but I hope that it doesn’t lead to his own demise. But with the way things have been going so far, I wouldn’t rule it out.

    Other thoughts:

    – The arrow comes out through Denise’s right eye, making her now the third character that I can recall who’s suffered an injury to that specific socket, after The Governor and Carl. What weird vendetta do “TWD” writers have against right eyes?

    – Abe compliments Eugene’s quick thinking during the showdown with Dwight, telling him admiringly, “You had him by the d—k, Eugene. I mean that with the utmost respect.”

    – The specifics are unknown, but we can see from Dwight’s mangled appearance that the Saviors have exacted their punishment for his earlier escape. He sports some pretty significant scars on the side of his face and head, which look like the result of severe burns, and one of his ears appears to have melted off. Yikes.

    – Loved the moment when Denise tries to give Daryl pointers on driving a stick shift, and Daryl just shoots her a silent, glowering look.

    – Another awkward, well-played moment between Denise and Daryl and Rosita: The latter two tell her to hang back in the apothecary, and Denise offers meekly, “Do you want me to hold your bags, or…?”

    – A unique problem that surfaced tonight: How do you kill a zombie whose head is covered with impenetrable melted metal? Solution: Stab him up through the bottom of his chin.

    – Daryl refused to take the train tracks on the way to the apothecary, perhaps because the last time he followed some tracks, they led to Terminus. Unfortunately, the trio takes that route home, setting up the Savior ambush.

    – Abraham finally declares his love for Sasha, sweetly telling her, “Could be 30 years for us here. That’s still not enough.” Commence all the “Awwwww”s.

    – As for Abe’s ex, after being unceremoniously dumped, Rosita has decided to hook up with Spencer, of all people. That questionable choice is followed by another, when she begrudgingly agrees to have dinner with him, despite Spencer’s pledge to make a dish he’s dubbed “beef jerky stroganoff.” You may have been terrible to Denise, but you’re still better than this, Rosita.

    – An odd confluence of events ends the episode, where we see some Alexandrians wheeling out the community’s guns and ammo from the pantry to the front gate. And as Sasha’s back is turned on the watchtower, an RV pulls up. There could be any number of explanations for either scenario, though I got the impression that they were part of a flash-forward. Perhaps the ammo is being presented to the Saviors, who have wormed their way into the community after all. And the RV – which may or may not have been detected by anyone – could house whoever has come to collect. Of course, the vehicle could also be Tara and Heath, returned from their run. The repetition that began the episode suggests some time has passed, but that could also be meant to illustrate the monotony that’s beset the community. Or I could be reading way too much into it. (The latter seems to be the safest bet.)

    Photo credit: Gene Page/AMC

    %Slideshow-363077%

  • 6 Things to Know Before ‘The Walking Dead’ Season 6 Premiere

    %Slideshow-326754%
    After The Walking Dead” are no doubt wondering what’s in store for Rick and co. on the upcoming Season 6 premiere, set to air on AMC Sunday, October 11 at 9/8c. Here, we’ve compiled 6 things you need to know to prepare for this weekend’s show. Andrew Lincoln as Rick Grimes - The Walking Dead _ Season 6, Episode 1 - Photo Credit: Gene Page/AMC

  • New ‘Walking Dead’ Season 6 Photos and Character Details Revealed

    Walking Dead“The Walking Dead” season 6 looks like it’s all about “us vs. them” — and now there seem to be more of “them.”

    Entertainment Weekly has several new photos from the upcoming season of the AMC drama, including images of characters played by new cast members Ethan Embry and Merritt Wever. The two actors’ participation in the show was announced at Comic-Con, but no details of their characters were revealed. Now, EW has the scoop.

    Wever — who won an Emmy on “Nurse Jackie” — is playing Dr. Denise Cloyd, who is present in the “Walking Dead” comics. She’s a surgeon whose skills will undoubtedly come in very handy after Rick (Andrew Lincoln) killed Pete last season.
    Walking Dead
    Meanwhile, Embry plays Carter who is “a combo of a few characters [from the comics] that we actually haven’t hit yet or weren’t able to hit in other characters,” said showrunner Scott M. Gimple. “He is an Alexandrian, and has been there the whole time, just quite busy.”

    From what we saw in the trailer, Carter does not see eye to eye with Rick.
    Walking Dead
    And EW has a third photo of another new character, played by Corey Hawkins (“Straight Outta Compton), named Heath who is a supply runner for Alexandria. Maybe he’ll prove to be a better scouting partner for Glenn (Steven Yeun) than the cowardly Nicholas.Walking Dead
    “The Walking Dead” season 6 premieres October 11.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

    %Slideshow-230399%