Tag: leonard-nimoy

  • 15 Things You Never Knew About ‘Star Trek’ on its 10th Anniversary

    15 Things You Never Knew About ‘Star Trek’ on its 10th Anniversary

    Paramount Pictures

    It’s now been ten years since Paramount Pictures rebooted one of the greatest sci-fi franchises of all time and gave us a brand new “Star Trek.” This film helped reinvigorate the franchise and made stars out of the likes of Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and Zoe Saldana. While we continue the wait for a a fourth movie that may never happen, enjoy this fun trivia about the making of this epic reboot.

    1. The origins of the reboot can be traced as far back as 1968, when “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry announced at a fan convention his plans to create a movie prequel detailing the formation of the Enterprise crew.

    2. Before this film materialized, Paramount was developing a different reboot called “Star Trek: The Beginning.” This version would have been set during the Earth-Romulan War and centered around Kirk’s ancestor Tiberius Chase.

    Paramount Pictures

    3. The crew relied on an abandoned Budweiser plant factories to depict the cluttered engine rooms of the Enterprise.

    4. John Cho was initially reluctant to play the role of Hikaru Sulu, as Cho is Korean American and Sulu is Japanese American. However, original Sulu actor George Takei encouraged Cho to take the part.

    5. In certain scenes, the special effects team had to completely reanimate Eric Bana and Leonard Nimoy‘s mouths. That’s because Bana severely injured his teeth and Nimoy’s dialogue was changed during the older Spock’s first encounter with Kirk.

    Paramount Pictures

    6. Kirk is shown eating an apple during the Kobayashi Maru training sequence. This mirrors a scene from “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” where an older Kirk eats an apple while recounting the story of that infamous scandal.  According to director J.J. Abrams, this homage was completely accidental.

    7. Winona Ryder was cast as Spock’s mother Amanda, despite being only six years older than Zachary Quinto. This is because the film was originally supposed to include an early scene of Amanda giving birth to her son.

    Paramount Pictures

    8. “Star Trek: The Next Generation” star Wil Wheaton provided voiceover dialogue for many of the Romulans on Nero’s ship.

    9. Karl Urban‘s Dr. McCoy mentions joining Starfleet after going through a nasty divorce. This pays homage to an unused story from writer D.C. Fontana, which was originally written for Season 3 of the TV series.

    10. There’s a reason Nero is MIA for so long in between traveling into the past and battling the Enterprise crew. A deleted subplot reveals that Nero  and his crew were captured by Klingons and imprisoned for several decades.

    IDW Publishing

    11. IDW Publishing released several tie-in comic books that flesh out the events surrounding the film.  2009’s “Star Trek: Countdown” explores the events that led to Nero’s journey into the past and features Captain Picard as a major character. 2010’s “Star Trek: Nero” expands on the movie’s deleted Klingon subplot.

    12. This turned out to be the final “Star Trek” film Majel Roddenberry worked on. Barrett provided the voice of Starfleet’s computers dating back to the original TV series. She passed way in December 2008, two weeks after completing her dialogue for the reboot.

    Paramount Pictures

    13. A lucky few fans were given a surprise early screening in April 2019. The Alamo Drafthouse advertised a screening of “The Wrath of Khan” with a special 10-minute preview of the reboot. Instead, Nimoy and the film’s writers interrupted the film and asked attendees if they’d rather watch the new “Star Trek” instead.

    14. Paramount initially planned for a fourth film in the reboot series to follow 2016’s “Star Trek Beyond,” one which would bring back Chris Hemsworth as George Kirk. However, the film was canceled in January 2019 after negotiations broke down with Pine and Hemsworth.

    Paramount Pictures

    15. “Star Trek” may be getting rebooted all over again. Quentin Tarantino has pitched his idea for a movie and has voiced an interest in directing after completing work on “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”

    29301
  • The 15 Most Quotable ‘Simpsons’ Episodes, Ranked

    The 15 Most Quotable ‘Simpsons’ Episodes, Ranked

  • ‘Star Trek’ Legend Leonard Nimoy’s Kids Approve of Ethan Peck as Spock

    ‘Star Trek’ Legend Leonard Nimoy’s Kids Approve of Ethan Peck as Spock

    Star Trek/Facebook

    Following in the footsteps of Leonard Nimoy won’t be easy, but “Star Trek: Discovery” newcomer Ethan Peck at least has the support of the original Spock’s family.

    CBS announced Tuesday that the actor had been cast in the role, and he quickly showed that he knows what big shoes he has to try to fill. Peck tweeted a touching message for the Nimoys that was full of gratitude.

    “Thanks to the Nimoy family for your open arms, warm welcome, smiling curiosity and support, for making me feel worthy, as I embrace and take into my heart the iconic half alien we know as Mr. Spock,” Peck wrote. “It is an incomparable honor.”

    Peck’s tweet shows that the family has embraced him both figuratively and literally; it includes a photo in which he and Nimoy’s two children, Adam and Julie, alongside partners Terry Farrell and David Knight, are doing the Vulcan salute. The Nimoy family also shared it via Twitter, and they took the time to add kind messages.

    Trekkies’ response on Twitter to Peck’s casting was mixed, but he’ll have the chance to win everyone over soon. He joins a cast that Sonequa Martin-Green, Doug Jones, Shazad Latif, Anthony Rapp, Mary Wiseman, Wilson Cruz, and Anson Mount.

    New episodes of “Star Trek: Discovery” will arrive on CBS All Access in 2019.

  • ‘Star Trek Discovery’ Showrunner Has Found a New Spock

    ‘Star Trek Discovery’ Showrunner Has Found a New Spock

    CBS/Paramount

    “Star Trek” fans? Get ready for a new Spock.

    During a recent interview at Comic-Con 2018 with TrekMovie, showrunner and executive producer Alex Kurtzman confirmed what fans have known: everyone’s favorite Vulcan will be back for Season 2. But what fans didn’t know is how far along in the casting process the show is.

    “We are casting a new Spock,” Kurtzman revealed. “It’s not just a possibility, it’s been done.”

    The top-secret casting was not easy, according to Kurtzman.

    “Everybody assumes that because Spock is all about logic, that there is no emotion in there and that is entirely untrue. So, finding an actor to convey what we know to be very Vulcan, but also reveal so much emotion in the eyes and in the small gestures, so you understand there is just a tornado of things just happening under the surface is critical. So, you need an actor who can do both of those things at the same time, which is very challenging.”

    Kurtzman co-wrote “Star Trek” 2009, which brought Zachary Quinto‘s take on the iconic sci-fi character. Quinto appeared opposite Spock Prime, Leonard Nimoy, in both “Star Trek” and in 2013’s “Star Trek Into Darkness.”

    When Season 2 of “Discovery” kicks off, we’ll meet a Spock roughly a decade before the start of “The Original Series’” first season — but while serving aboard the Enterprise captained by Christopher Pike, who commanded the starship before Kirk in “Trek’s” first pilot, “The Cage.” Season 2 presumably takes place after the events of “The Cage.”

    We’ll find out who scored the highly-coveted role when “Discovery”  launches its second season on CBS All Access in early 2019. The season will be preceded by mini-episodes, “Short Treks,” toward the end of 2018.

     

  • 13 Things You Never Knew About ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’

    For 35 years, we’ve had to put up with friends’ impersonations of Shatner‘s “Khaaaaan!” above.

    But the legacy of “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” is more than that; it’s been the best Star Trek movie ever for more than three decades due to its thematically rich and character-driven plot and director (and un-credited writer) Nicholas Meyer‘s choice to ground “Khan’s” 23rd century everything in real, relatable, emotional stakes. Oh, and the starships going “pew pew!” kicks ass, too.

    As the movie that killed Spock celebrates its 35th birthday, here are a few behind-the-secrets you probably never knew. (Thanks to BirthMoviesDeath for a few of these facts!)
    1. Fans have covered every inch of this movie, but they may not know that the film’s original/”official” title is actually “Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan.”

    2. Several versions of the film went through script development, before Meyer pinched the best parts of each into a new draft in 12 days. The aborted storylines included Jack Sowards’ “The Omega System,” where Spock died abut 45 pages into the film. Another treatment, from the late producer Harve Bennett, centered on Vice Admiral Kirk — bound to a desk on Earth — learning of a rebellion on a far-off planet, one seemingly sparked by the Admiral’s estranged son, David. Kirk and crew would venture to this planet and discover, about halfway through the movie, that Khan was pulling David and the rebellion’s strings. (Along the way, Kirk would discover an adrift spaceship, aboard which was the woman he loved.)
    3. Yup, that’s a space baby on Khan’s stolen starship, the Reliant. How’d it get there? In a deleted scene — of which no known footage currently exists — we would have first met Khan’s baby in the cargo container home to Khan’s followers on Ceti Alpha V. Chekov, with Captain Terrell, would have encountered the small boy as he looked out the window of the container. Then, the boy’s second and final appearance would occur in Reliant’s transporter room as he is drawn to the flashing lights of the Genesis torpedo building up to detonation.

    4. Another deleted scene featured Dr. McCoy operating on Chekov in Enterprise’s sickbay, after a Ceti Eel crawled out of Chekov’s ear. 5. Aaaand two more deleted scenes — one revealing that Kristie Alley’s character, Lt. Saavik, is half-Romulan. The other involves Kirk introducing Saavik to his son, David. Watch them above.

    6. Saavik’s half-Romulan heritage is never revealed in-canon via the films; it’s always been something fans have understood in large part due to expanded universe novels.
    7. Ever wonder why Scotty is crying over the death of mid-shipman Preston? That’s because Preston is Scotty’s nephew. Deleted footage — incorporated into the Director’s Cut — would have revealed that info, as well as fleshed out the officer’s screentime in a way to better justify Scotty’s tears over Preston’s deathbed.

    8. There are three versions of the movie: The Director’s (expanded) cut, which is finally on Blu, the theatrical cut, and the ABC TV version. The latter is filled with mostly alternative takes, most notably in the scene between Saavik and Kirk on the turbolift. Unlike the theatrical cut’s use of a wide shot for this sequence, the TV cut plays out in mostly tight close-ups. And Alley’s line deliveries are more seductive. 9. Khan’s right-hand man, Joachim (Judson Scott, right), was supposed to be named Joaquin, a character that appeared in the original series episode “Space Seed,” which introduced Khan. Due to a production issue — and possibly the fact that the studio would have had to pay royalties to the original episode’s writer for using his character in the feature film — the character’s name was changed.

    10. Judson Scott’s name does not appear credited in the film, however. His agent messed that up by trying (and failing) to negotiate a bigger credit for his client from Paramount.
    11. Producer Robert Sallin, at a recent LA screening of the film, revealed that he was responsible for executing the final shot of Spock’s photon torpedo coffin on the Genesis Planet’s surface.

    12. Director Meyer was against the reshoot, as he was not a fan of hinting to the Vulcan’s resurrection, but Salin went up to a park in San Francisco with a limited budget in the low six-figures and, using his commercial production background, directed the final shot.
    13. Shatner originally rejected Meyer’s rewrite; Meyer realized that the actor’s main concern was that Kirk was “not the first through the door.” That he wasn’t at the level of big-screen hero that the actor wanted to play. So Meyer made some tweaks, sent a new draft to Shatner, and — soon after — the actor called and, in a message on Meyer’s answering machine, gushes about the script. He went so far to call Meyer a “genius,” according to the filmmaker, who — to this day — claims to still have that tape.

  • 11 Things You Never Knew About ‘Lethal Weapon’

    Hard as it is to believe, the original “Lethal Weapon” turns 30 this year. Well, maybe not that hard when you take a gander at Mel Gibson’s mullet…

    But even after all these decades, Detectives Riggs and Murtaugh are anything but too old for this s***. To celebrate this milestone, join us as we explore some interesting facts you might not know about this classic buddy-cop action movie.
    1. Mel Gibson can thank Riggs for landing him the juicy lead role in 1990’s “Hamlet.” Director Franco Zeffirelli was impressed by Gibson’s acting in the scene where Riggs considers committing suicide.

    2. Most aspiring filmmakers have to work for years to get a foothold into the industry, but writer Shane Black wrote the “Lethal Weapon” screenplay shortly after graduating from UCLA and almost immediately caught the eye of producer Joel Silver. Some guys have all the luck…3. For all that his character complained about being “too old for this s***,” Danny Glover was only 40-years-old when “Lethal Weapon” was filmed. No wonder Murtaugh didn’t actually wind up retiring until 1997’s “Lethal Weapon 4.”

    4. It’s just as well Glover was still a spring chicken, as he and Gibson had to go through some pretty intense physical training for their roles. Both actors spent months training and studied martial arts forms like Capoeira, Brazilian jiu-jitsu. and something called “Jailhouse Rock.”5. “Star Trek” icon Leonard Nimoy was approached to direct “Lethal Weapon,” but he was apparently turned off by the film’s violence. Instead, Nimoy went on to direct the hit comedy “Three Men and a Baby.”

    6. We very nearly lived in a world where Bruce Willis played Detective Riggs and Mel Gibson was the face of the “Die Hard” franchise. Willis turned down the part of Riggs to star in “Die Hard,” while Gibson turned down the part of John McClane to star in “Lethal Weapon.”

    7. Willis was hardly the only one to turn down the part of Riggs. Other candidates included Jeff Goldblum, Christopher Reeve, Patrick Swayze, Pierce Brosnan, and Michael Douglas.8. During the course of the movie, Murtaugh tells Riggs a story about surviving a battle in Ia Drang Valley during the Vietnam War. Funnily enough, Mel Gibson would eventually go on to star in 2002’s “We Were Soldiers,” which depicts that particular battle (above).
    9. The film once featured completely different opening and ending scenes. Originally, the movie ended with Riggs and Murtaugh bidding farewell rather than Riggs showing up for Christmas dinner at the Murtaugh household.

    10. Riggs is very good at cheating death. An earlier draft of the script had Riggs dying at the end, and Black also contemplated killing off the character in 1989’s “Lethal Weapon 2.”11. While we’ll probably never see a “Lethal Weapon 5,” now that the franchise has been rebooted for TV, Shane Black apparently did write a story for a new sequel. In an interview with Nerdist’s The Writer’s Panel podcast, Black revealed that he co-wrote a 62-page treatment that would reunite the iconic cops in what the filmmaker thought would make for a “very good movie.”

    “It was essentially an older Riggs and Murtagh in New York City during the worst blizzard in east coast history, fighting a team of expert Blackwater guys from Afghanistan that’s smuggling antiquities,” Black said. “And we had a young character that actually counter-pointed them.”

    So why did the movie not happen? “I didn’t wanna do what people do when they’re trying to transition which is, they sorta put the two older guys in the movie, but really it’s about their son!” Black said. “And he’s gonna take over and we’re gonna do a spinoff. F**k that, if they’re gonna be in the movie, they’re gonna be in the movie — I don’t care how old they are.”

  • Long-Lost ‘Star Trek’ Footage Presents a New, Not-So-Final Frontier

    STAR TREK (1966) original television series castCall it a 50th anniversary present or the ultimate “Star Trek” holiday gift: either way, fans of the sci-fi franchise — especially the original 1966 TV series that started it all — are about to unwrap something special.

    The Roddenberry Vault,” which debuts on Blu-ray Dec. 13, is a startling three-disc time capsule that takes viewers viscerally back to “Star Trek’s” very beginnings. For years, “Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry had maintained a warehouse space that was kept up long after his death in 1991. When Roddenberry’s son, Rod, investigated its contents almost a decade ago, he made an astounding discovery: reels and reels and reels of long-believed lost production footage from the set of the original series, which aired on NBC for three seasons from 1966-1969.

    The husband-and-wife team of Mike and Denise Okuda have a long association with the “Star Trek” franchise: Mike designed the now-iconic look of the computer displays seen in “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and subsequent sequel shows, as well as serving as technical consultant on the show’s pseudo-future science; Denise has served as a scenic artist and computer and video supervisor on various film and TV incarnations of “Star Trek”; and together the couple have co-authored several books about the series — including the seminal and recently updated “Star Trek Encyclopedia” — catalogued historic memorabilia for from the productions for Christie’s auction house and created special DVD content and consulted on high-definition upgrades of the series.

    Over nine years, the two passionate uber-fans painstaking reviewed the bits and pieces of film discovered within the warehouse, looking for historic and archival gems that would ultimately shed a unique and brand-new light on a 50-year-old series that has been discussed and dissected by legions of fans: lost scenes from the classic episode of “City on the Edge of Forever,” evidence of an alternate ending to “Who Mourns for Adonais?”; a long-suspected deleted sequence between James T. Kirk and his orphaned nephew, Peter, from “Operation: Annihilate!”; a long, unedited, single-camera take of Leonard Nimoy in character as Mr. Spock.; and more.Deleted scene from STAR TREKThe result of their labors — as spotlighted in “The Roddenberry Vault” among a series of extensive documentaries, special features collected clips, interviews of “Trek’s” original cast and creators and a roster of current Hollywood movers and shakers they inspired, and a dozen original episodes presented for context — will be, for “Star Trek” fans everyone — downright thrilling, as the Okudas recounted exclusively to Moviefone.

    Moviefone: I would imagine that you are thrilled to bring these amazing discoveries to the “Star Trek” fandom at large. When you first got wind of the possibilities locked up in all of these film canisters, given how close you’ve been to the franchise over the years, tell me what was running through your mind when you first found out you were going to have the chance to go spelunking.

    Denise Okuda: It was a dream come true. For years, I just felt like there was more out there. We’ve seen clips of things that were filmed. We’ve seen stills like the end of “Operation: Annihilate!” with Peter Kirk on the Bridge. We know this was filmed. So where is that film? For years and years and years and years, I would ask directors, I would ask people, and nobody knew where it was.

    I just had this faith that something was out there. So nine years ago, when we were contacted, we were told to meet at this obscure warehouse in Los Angeles. We signed nondisclosures, and they took us in to this room where there were rows and rows and rows of cans of film.

    Mike Okuda: It was very much a “Raiders of the Lost Ark” moment. We walked in. They showed us the films and our jaws just dropped.

    Denise: Dropped! And, of course, because we know “Star Trek” very well, and I don’t know why, but dialogue just sticks with me, we started looking at some of the stuff, and it was like, “Oh, my God. That’s an alternate take,” or, “Oh my God, that’s an omitted line.”

    It’s like Christmas and Easter and Halloween, and any other special holiday that you could think of, wrapped up into one, and we cannot tell you how thrilled and excited we are that other “Star Trek” fans like us are going to be able to see this stuff. We’ve been waiting for this day for nine years.Temp special effects footage from STAR TREKAs you started exploring, how quickly did you start finding the most significant pieces that have been hidden away? Did they slowly reveal themselves, or was it early on you were like, “Oh, we’ve got a goldmine here?”

    Mike: The footage wasn’t organized, so when we saw them, it was almost entirely in random order, which means you’d have a whole bunch of things that were, “Eh? Basically the same that’s on the air.”

    Then, suddenly, there’d be a line of dialogue, but we were lucky: very early on, we found the footage from “Operation: Annihilate!” There’s a famous scene that everyone knew existed because they’d seen clips of Kirk’s nephew Peter coming on the Bridge, and it was a different ending to the episode. We found some of that footage. Needless to say, we were thrilled.

    Denise: Now, you need to remember, and what we try to tell people, is that these are snippets from the cutting room floor. There aren’t many entire scenes that are intact. Most of this is alternate takes, omitted dialogues, different angles. Some of them are relatively short. Some of them are a little longer. But it’s magical because this stuff, we’ve never seen before. It was the cutting room floor. It was meant to be thrown in the trash, and it was rescued.

    So if you are big fans of “Star Trek,” as we are, and you know the scenes and you know the dialogue and you can tell that there’s new dialogue, that’s really special. But if you don’t know, then we will give you context. And how we did context was through a couple of documentaries.

    Our coworker, a very fine filmmaker, The Big Bang Theory.” We talked to [original series writer/producer] Dorothy Fontana. We talked to several of the original series actors. So we hope that there’s something for everyone on this Blu-ray.

    From watching the documentaries, it sounds like, perhaps, that legendary, lost alternate ending to the episode “Who Mourns for Adonais?” was the Holy Grail that you were looking for, and you had some success. Tell me about that particular one, and then some others that were just truly tremendous finds among all of these little snippets.

    Mike: One of the most satisfying pieces we found wasn’t a deleted ending, but was some dialogue that was cut, purely for time, from “The City on the Edge of Forever,” when just after Kirk saves Edith Keeler from falling down the stairs, they exchange a romantic moment. But after that moment, there were several lines of dialogue which were very sweet between the two of them, and you can just see that they’re in love. It’s a great character moment for both Kirk and Edith, and of course it makes Edith’s subsequent death that much more poignant.

    Denise: I think another thing that is very special is what I call the fly on the wall. It puts you there behind the camera. You can see the shooting company. You can see the actors getting ready for their takes. That’s like being there. For anyone that is a fan of “Star Trek,” that’s a very magical feeling.

    Michael and I worked on the other incarnations of “Star Trek.” We never, of course, worked on the original, but that’s our favorite. And so to be there, vicariously, watching this footage was very, very special, and an unexpected treasure. We knew that there would probably be omitted dialogue and alternate takes, because you shoot a master and then you shoot the close-ups and so forth. So we figured there would be some of that, but we also were very pleased to be able to have that experience of being there.

    You present so much material on the disks. Is this just scratching the surface of what you discovered? Is there a lot more, and is there any plan to figure out a way to get that out there for the fans to see?

    Mike: We tried to use the best material, and we’re not aware of any plans in the future. We certainly did not approach this saying, “OK, let’s hold some stuff back for another product.” We said, ‘Let’s go for it. Let’s make this as good as we can. This is a lot of good stuff.”

    Denise: Yeah, we worked really, really, really hard on this project. It’s a passion project, as you can imagine. Roger and Mike and I worked just seven days a week for months and months, trying to mine the best stuff, weave it into the documentaries, so that we could share the best, the very best stuff. So I think that’s probably, this is it, and we’re so lucky to have what we have.

    How did working on this project make you think about the original series or Gene Roddenberry or any aspect of the phenomenon that is “Star Trek” in a different, new, or fresh way?

    Mike: We grew up with the original “Star Trek” series. We watch the reruns all the time. So we started out as fans of the show. We started with “Next Generation.” We were connected with the productions, so we have a different perspective on this show. That is, we love the [sequel] shows, but we think of them as, “This is what I worked on.”

    You have a different relationship to it. So watching this footage from “The Roddenberry Vault,” you get a sense of the team that’s involved. You get a sense of what the actors went through. You get a sense of what the writers did. One of my favorite bits in “The Roddenberry Vault” is watching these moments of Leonard Nimoy. You can see him working on in his brain how to play the character of Spock. You get a sense of, as Denise said, what it was to be there.Leonard Nimoy and DeForest Kelley in STAR TREKIs this the last undiscovered bit of “Star Trek,” do you imagine? Or are there still places to look for amazing discoveries like this? It feels like, here we are, 50 years later, and 50 years from now there’s still going to be an appetite for this kind of material.

    Mike: If you had asked this before this stuff was revealed to us, we would have said, no, there’s nothing else. So who knows?

    Denise: Who knows? But I can’t imagine. I’m happy. I’m satisfied. I still can’t believe how lucky we are, and how lucky everyone is going to be when they see this Blu-ray, that we have the opportunity to see this lost footage and be there on set, vicariously. I’m almost speechless, but you can tell I’m not speechless, because I’m so absolutely head-over-heels excited that this is finally, finally coming out.

    I have to say, all of the interviews were a treat, but there seemed to be something special about William Shatner‘s comments in the documentaries. Did you guys get the sense of that? Was there a little bit more magic in his memories this time around?

    Mike: I think you’re exactly right. We had originally arranged to do a very short interview with him, and Bill just kept saying, “Oh no, I just want to keep talking.” He delved into his feeling as an actor, into the process of bringing to Kirk to life, of living in Kirk’s emotions, and he spoke of the drama of the storytelling of “Star Trek’s” mythology. Frankly, I’ve never heard him open up like this before.

    Denise: I’ve not, either, and we had occasion to work with Mr. Shatner on several of the feature films, and also just see him from time to time, and of course listen to many interviews that he’s done. Roger Lay conducted the interview, and he’s very skilled at asking questions and doing interviews, puts people at ease. But I have never seen an interview with Bill Shatner like this before. He was so gracious and so giving and so open that we share your opinion as well. We were blown away, quite frankly.

    Next year, we’re looking at the 30th anniversary of “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” a series in which you of course were so intimately involved. Anything special on the horizon that we can look forward to, to kind of mark that big anniversary?

    Mike: Honestly, we haven’t thought that far ahead!

    Denise: We just wrapped the “Star Trek Encyclopedia,” which took two years to do, and “The Roddenberry Vault,” which took around nine years to do, and we just wrapped relatively recently. It was a really tight deadline. So, right now, we’re decorating our Christmas tree, and we’re doing Christmas cards, and we’re playing with our dog. So we don’t know. January is around the corner, and I hope something transpires because it’s a real special anniversary.Mike Okuda & Denise OkudaWhat keeps you guys motivated to do the great archival work on the “Star Trek” franchise that you’ve done?

    Mike: Like so many other people, we’re “Star Trek” fans. We love the stuff, and we know how much “Star Trek” has meant to us, and we know how much “Star Trek” means to so many people, and it’s worth it to do it.

    Denise: Mike and I feel very, very strongly in the vision of Gene Roddenberry for hope for the future, that we are one human family, and that we need to be kind to each other. And particularly in the world right now, that is sorely lacking. And, so, we feel that through “Star Trek,” we can reach out to other people and say, “Hey, you know what? It’s going to be OK, and we need to pull together, and we need to be kind to each other.” I think that that is something that’s extremely important and part of the reason we enjoy these projects.

    Gene Roddenberry was a great futurist, but do you imagine he envisioned that preserving this material was the right thing to do, to keep it all stored away, at a time when archiving television material was not the norm? Do you think he suspected the significance it was going to have?

    Mike: We have no idea what Gene thought. But his son, Rod Roddenberry, he, from a fairly early age knew the stuff was there, and he was the one who actively preserved the stuff, even after his mother was gone. So Rod Roddenberry certainly had understood that this stuff was unique, and thank goodness he did what he did.

    Denise: We also have to give a big shout out to CBS and to CBS Home Entertainment … I think they thought we were crazy at times, because we were so passionate. We just fought. We just said, “No, we’ve got to do this. We’ve got to squeeze every inch out of this so we could put it into this Blu-ray set of discs and share it with other ‘Star Trek’ fans.” We kept saying “It’s really, really important. And it’s the 50th anniversary. So that’s kind of just a tip of the hat to CBS for their support. We can’t thank them enough.

  • ‘Star Trek’ Stars From Across Its 50-Year History Share What Their Voyage Means to Them

    To celebrate the 50th anniversary of “Star Trek,” which first aired on Sept. 8, 1966, and has continued to boldly go forward as one of the most enduring, influential and visionary television creations of all time, Moviefone is offering a week-long look at five decades of the futuristic franchise.

    No television series has enjoyed such a unique and unlikely path to becoming a cultural phenomenon as “Star Trek.” Creator Gene Roddenberry‘s pioneering vision for an adult, ambitious and allegorical science fiction series featuring explorers aboard the starship Enterprise experienced rocky beginnings as a failed pilot deemed “too intellectual” by NBC.

    But the network gave the premise a second chance and, with the addition of more action and an appealing triumvirate of new leads Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock and Dr. McCoy, fueled by William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, and Deforest Kelley‘s delightful chemistry, the forward-thinking series got a second chance at life, airing for the first time 50 years ago today, on Sept. 8, 1966.

    What followed has become legendary in the creation of what would become a full-fledged franchise, including the highly-rated syndicated series “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and its subsequent shared-universe series; the box office-dominating films that rebooted the “Star Trek” originals with new actors; tie-in novels and comic books; and a massive merchandising empire.

    But, at its core, “Star Trek” has always been a story about humanity, both on screen and behind the scenes. And to that effect, Moviefone has spent the last several months of the sci-fi phenom’s golden anniversary in the company of many of the key creative people at the heart of its various incarnations, gathering their takes on what it’s meant to them to occupy a place within the singular sensation called “Star Trek.”2016 Summer TCA Tour - NBCUniversal Press Tour Day 1 - ArrivalsWilliam Shatner (actor, Capt. James T. Kirk, “Star Trek: The Original Series,” “Star Trek” theatrical films I-VI, “Star Trek: Generations”): We’ve invented, through science fiction, a mythology, and “Star Trek” is a huge part of that. So many great science fiction writers had ideas for “Star Trek,” even if they didn’t write exactly for “Star Trek,” so it was 50 years as a mere television show, and through various iterations expanded to affect a great deal of our culture, far beyond anything we know.

    I mean, I wrote a book called “I’m Working on That” based on Stephen Hawking’s statement, when he walked into the set of “Star Trek” and saw these cheesy boards painted to look like … what’s the stuff we use for energy? … dilithium crystals. That’s how we were able to go so fast to cover the vast distances of space. Stephen Hawking said “I’m working on that.” It goes out in waves, and it seems somewhat innocuous, because it’s a television show, but in this case, this phenomenon has lasted 50 years.Premiere Of 20th Century Fox's "Independence Day: Resurgence" - Red CarpetBrent Spiner (actor, Lt. Commander Data, “Star Trek: The Next Generation”): “Star Trek” is the most amazing phenomenon. I think it’s the great American narrative. Because anything that has gone for 50 years you have to take seriously. There were a lot of people who think “Star Trek” is practically a religion. There are other people who think it’s absolutely silly. It’s somehow all of those things combined, and that’s what makes it wonderful.

    Even if you think it’s completely ridiculous, you have to kind of say, “What is this that’s gone for 50 years? I’ve got to at least check it out.” There’s something going on here, and it’s affected a lot of people. We’ve all had people come to us and say, “It’s because of your show, it’s because of you, that I am now a doctor or a scientist or …” So there’s something more going on there than meets the eye. There’s a wonderful action-adventure show, but there’s also something deeper and more profound.

    Dorothy “D. C.” Fontana (writer and story editor, “Star Trek: The Original Series,” “Star Trek: The Animated Series,” “Star Trek: The Next Generation”): We told good stories, I think. I’ve said this over and over: we were telling stories about things that were going on in our world, under the guise of science fiction. We were telling stories about racism, and sexism, and political things that were going on in our country, and in the world. We were doing stories about, well, just about anything — the Vietnam War, that was a big one. Nobody else could mention the Vietnam War, or even that we were in it, but we could, under the guise of science fiction.

    We reached out to people. We tapped them on the head and say, “Hey, are you paying attention?” But we were doing it in the guise of interesting science fiction stories. We had some great science fiction writers on the show, especially in the first year, who brought that wonderful element of exploring topical themes under the guise of science fiction.Star Trek Beyond Asia Tour - Beijing Press ConferenceChris Pine (actor, Captain James T. Kirk, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond“): It’s fun playing a leader when sometimes you don’t always necessarily feel like a leader yourself. So you learn what that’s like because on set naturally then you’re saying stuff that sounds leader-ish. So then you sometimes assume the part. There’s some learning lessons there. I suppose my reluctance in that regard kind of maybe reflects in the character himself, because I think we all have times where we either want to be front seat or backseat drivers.

    I appreciate in this latest installment playing a character that was a bit more existentially indecisive and lost and seeking some sort of new guidance, or new propulsion, or new energy behind what he was going to do, because sometimes things change when you’re a little bit older.Star Trek: Mission New York - Day 3Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”): Initially, when I watched the show in the ’60s, it meant what everybody talks about as that inclusion of different characters, different races, and hope for the future — all the kind of stuff that we know about. And then, when I was in college, it was about great fun and getting your mind off of your school work and everything just for an hour, just to not really concentrate on other things, having a good time.

    Then later on when I got the show, it was about, “Wow, great! It’s a great character. I’m going to do a really great job. I’m really happy about this. I’m a working actor again.” And then it became the people I worked with. That was the most exciting part.

    David Gerrold (writer, “The Trouble with The Tribbles,” associate producer, “Star Trek; The Next Generation”): Gene Roddenberry gave us “Star Trek” [and] he was passionate about “Star Trek.” And if it hadn’t been for him, we’d have never had the show. So we have this incredibly iconic thing that is going to change our culture for generations to come, because it’s about the possibilities of the future, it’s about a future where we’re all thriving and doing well and all have opportunities and we’re all included.

    it’s a very positive view of the future, and I give Gene enormous credit for that, because I don’t think anybody else has been able to create that kind of a vision of a future that works for all of us, with no one and nothing left out.Amazon Red Carpet Premiere Screening For Season Two Of Original Drama Series, "Bosch"Star Trek: Voyager”): It’s an optimistic, hopeful view of what we could possibly achieve in the future as humanity. If we can get it together. That’s what Gene was so brilliant at with the original series, in the very beginning, was showing in the height of the Cold War, a Russian officer on the bridge. Not that long after World War II, a Japanese officer on the bridge. Blacks, whites, women, everybody. And everyone was together and everyone worked together.

    I think it’s so important for us to see that now as a society. Not just in America, although really specifically here, but the whole world. We need to not be afraid of everyone who’s different. We’ve got to embrace our differences and realize that we’re stronger together, and we’re all inherently the same when it gets down to it."Star Trek Beyond" UK PremiereJohn Cho (actor, Hikaru Sulu, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): In the “Star Trek” setup, you’re going into space and seeing so many different kinds of species, it does become comically apparent when you look around the planet Earth that we live on that we do have so much more in common than we don’t. You know? So the little things that seem to divide us here in our present time seem even more exaggeratedly small after seeing an episode of “Star Trek.”Simon Pegg (actor, Montgomery “Scotty” Scott, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” writer, “Star Trek Beyond”): The first thing I saw was the animated series, funny enough, which ran I think from like ’72 to ’74, I think, which had the original cast. And as a very young child, I was like three or four, it caught my eye. Then I found out there was actually a live action version that pre-dated it, and I started watching that. I found that scary at first. I found that “The Corbomite Maneuver” and the terrifying Balok was the figurehead of my childhood nightmares.

    But it was still like something I had to watch. And that grew into a love of its kind of intelligence. As I got older, I started to understand just how much weight it carried, allegorically. It’s meant different things to me over the years. And obviously, now, it kind of means the world to me.Premiere Of Paramount Pictures' "Star Trek Beyond" - ArrivalsKarl Urban (actor, Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I remember watching “Star Trek” when I was a kid with my dad, and then I watched “Star Trek” with my kids. There’s something about “Star Trek” that just has this enduring appeal. It’s a hopeful, positive, optimistic vision of the future, and it was a fun show.The Cartier Fifth Avenue Grand Reopening EventZachary Quinto (actor, Mr. Spock, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I think Leonard Nimoy would be really proud of what we accomplished … I take it seriously, and I feel like this is one of the most beloved characters in popular culture. He made it so. I see my responsibility as carry on his legacy and honoring the work that he put into this character, and the love that he lived with it for so long.5th Annual Critics' Choice Television Awards - Red CarpetScott Bakula (actor, Capt. Jonathan Archer, “Star Trek: Enterprise”): I fell in love with it, really, in re-runs when I was in college, because it was on every night, followed by Tom Snyder. So everything stopped, and we would watch “Star Trek.” I lived in a fraternity house: “Star Trek,” Tom Snyder every night. And I loved the camaraderie of the show. They had the brotherly kind of love that I just thought was great. I hadn’t really seen it on television at that point.

    I loved the humor of it, but, mostly, at the end of the day, I just loved that relationship on that bridge. That’s why I wanted to do it and try and build something similar — you can’t repeat it, but similar on our show.

    Star Trek: Discovery”): I fell in love with “Star Trek” before even seeing “Star Trek.” And when I was a small child, too young to go to church, my brother had built a model of the Klingon cruiser and put a battery in it and turned off all the lights in the house and was flying it though.

    And I saw this ship, the silhouette of this ship, and my mind was lit on fire because I wanted to know who that ship belonged to, what they were like, where did they come from? And I started asking those questions and then I got to see “Star Trek” and I got to see an even bigger world than I imagined.

    Justin Lin (director, “Star Trek Beyond”): My family immigrated to the States when I was eight. They had a little fish and chips shop, and they would close at 9 and we’d have dinner at 10. At 11, “Star Trek” came on Channel 13, so my brothers and I would talk our way into just hanging out with them. So, from 8 to 18, that was our level of engagement and our family time.

    I remember moving to a new country felt like it was just the five of us. But watching “Star Trek,” it instilled in me that family is not just by blood. It’s through shared experience. That’s what “Star Trek” gave me. Our engagement was through re-runs, but every night, it was a new adventure with new obstacles and new challenges. That sense of discovery and exploration was a big part of growing up. My friends all had the little “Star Wars” figures, but we didn’t have any of that: we had “Star Trek.”Premiere Of Paramount Pictures' "Star Trek Beyond" - ArrivalsJ.J Abrams (director, “Star Trek,” “Star Trek Into Darkness,” producer “Star Trek Beyond”): I’m a late adopter, to be totally honest. I was not a “Star Trek” fan as a kid, and I realized what I missed out on, because I got to fall in love with it watching the shows when I started working on the films.

    Michael Giacchino (music score, “Star Trek” (2009), “Star Trek Into Darkness,” “Star Trek Beyond”): I grew up in the early ’70s, so that’s how I watched it — I didn’t see it when it first aired. But I remember the first time I saw it thinking, “What is this? What on Earth is this show?” And I just kept watching it and watching it. And then I was asking about, “Can I have the action figures? Can I have the play set? The Enterprise play set?” Which I still have all that stuff. I still have it!

    It was sort of my first science fiction love. That show introduced me to science fiction, and then all of a sudden I was in love with “2001,” and I just kept going from there. But it was my gateway drug into sci-fi. [The original series music is] so iconic, because we’ve all watched those things so many times. And Alexander Courage’s theme is the greatest.

    Karl Urban: If it wasn’t for the fans, we wouldn’t be here. This show would have been cancelled in the second season.

    Simon Pegg: You’ve got to remember that it’s because it comes out of love and it comes out of a great sort of affection for something, which you can’t help but feel positive about. I get it. We all have our own feelings about “Star Trek.” It means something to all of us in different ways. What we tried to do with “Star Trek Beyond” was kind of try and embrace everybody that has come before, and everyone that hasn’t come yet.

    It’s almost like you can cross an episode of the original show with what you get from a modern blockbuster: “This is the hybrid — it’s year one and year 50 together.” That was our dream.Entertainment Weekly Hosts Its Annual Comic-Con Party At FLOAT At The Hard Rock Hotel In San Diego In Celebration Of Comic-Con 2Adam Savage (“Mythbusters” host, “Star Trek” fan): I grew up with the original series airing on television in the early ’70s. I watched every episode a million times. Science fiction has always had these two pulls, but one of them was about real social commentary, and that’s where “Star Trek’s” strengths are. I grew up inculcated with a sort of lovely liberal, diverse ethic that “Star Trek” baked right into the show, and that came right from Roddenberry.

    I will say, as a fan, every single human I’ve ever met within the “Star Trek” franchise is awesome. It’s like, this is a franchise born out of a cohesive work unit, and it really shows in the movies that they make.

    Michael Dorn: I still don’t know what “Star Trek” means — I really don’t! … CHiPs.” I didn’t know this until we had this conversation: Bob said, “You know, Michael, you created a character that’s an icon. That this guy is not just some guy, I mean, this is a guy that’s going to last, and it’s rare. You’re in the top .001% of actors who have done anything like that.” And at that point, that’s when I went, “My God, you’re right.” That’s when it kind of hit me.

    Jeri Ryan: It’s amazing the doors this has opened for us to get to meet people that are actually doing what we pretended to be doing on the show is really cool.

    Scott Bakula: I talked to a guy on the International Space Station with NASA. We sent up DVDs of our show, and he was watching it in space. We talked until Earth moved enough so we couldn’t talk anymore. We talked and talked and he said, “I’m going to lose you, sir.” He kept circling the planet. That was pretty cool. He made a video and sent it to us of them floating around up there and hanging out. It was combining all of it, it was completely surreal.

    We met a lot of the astronauts, who would come to the set, and to actually speak to somebody who was doing it up there was just something you wouldn’t expect you’d ever get to do in your life.

    Michael Dorn: I was a big airplane buff when I was growing up — I loved airplanes and I loved test pilots and I loved my cereal boxes, the boxtops with Friendship 7, John Glenn’s capsule. Those are the guys that I had a chance to meet that really kind of fueled my youth. That was amazing, because you’re talking about — they went to the moon! I mean, come on! Those are the guys that I just loved.

    Jeri Ryan: Specifically, for the character that I played, I heard from a lot of people on the autism spectrum who could relate to her, and said that this really helped them to see someone on TV, who kind of acted the way they did, and wasn’t sure of what they were doing, and was trying to figure things out socially, and that’s how they felt. And it was so touching for me, and I love that that was something that people could feel

    Scott Bakula: I was at the Griffith Park Observatory with my whole family, and a gal there came up and said “Hi, I work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. I sort of started working there because of ‘Star Trek.’” “Oh, that’s very nice. What do you do?” “You know the little thing that just landed on Mars?” she said, “Well, I kind of built that.”

    I said, “Are you kidding?” “Yeah, and I’m actually running it around Mars.” I was like, “Wow!” Yeah, and she’s like, “I’m such a fan of your show.” I said, “Forget about my show! How about you? You’re unbelievable!”

    William Shatner: For me, I love talking to people and finding the story and the character of who this person is and how they lived up to this point, and I’ve done shows in that way. I’ve just come back from Vancouver, where I was talking to the great geneticist from Amherst College, Dr. David Suzuki.

    It’s meeting people like Dr. Suzuki, astronaut Chris Hadfield, who I just interviewed a couple days ago at JPL — all of JPL subscribes to “Star Trek.” As does NASA. I’m doing a show for NASA, and all of NASA is enamored of “Star Trek.” I went to the doctor and he said “I became a doctor because of ‘Star Trek.’ Now spread your legs.”

    Brent Spiner: I had the opportunity to meet Dr. Hawking because he did an episode of the show. We met all of the Mercury astronauts, they were all still with us at the 30th anniversary of Alan Shepard’s first flight. It was overwhelming, and at that event was also Bob Hope and Walter Cronkite, and we were there, as pretend heroes.

    But for me, the most rewarding experience has been meeting all of these people: all of the family of “Star Trek” that have been in all of these episodes and films. The great creative people that I’ve got to rub shoulders with has been amazing. It’s a huge family at this point.

    Zachary Quinto: Hands down, my favorite part of filming these movies is getting to spend all my time with these people who are incredible. It keeps being brought up that we’ve been doing this for almost ten years, which is kind of unfathomable, but it was 2007 when we made the first movie. We are truly a family to one another. Even though we only get to work together every few years, we stay in touch and we stay connected. These are people that will be in my life for the rest of it. That to me is easily the best part about the experience.

    Justin Lin: I remember stepping into the hallways of Enterprise. The lights aren’t on and it’s still [being painted] and stuff. Just walking in there and feeling like, “Wow, I’m now part of this.”

    Karl Urban: Anytime you’re on the bridge of the Enterprise, and there’s 50 million buttons, you cannot help but go and push every single one of them. Just to see if something’s going to happen.

    J.J. Abrams: To be talking about the 50th anniversary is insane! I was born the same year that “Star Trek” was, and I know how old I feel. So the idea that this thing endures is incredible, and a real honor to be part of.

    Simon Pegg: I love that the universe is a boundless place and there’s so many adventures to be had. And as long as we have this idea that we might not just all kill ourselves and die in a big fire, we might actually become slightly more enlightened, slightly more tolerant beings and go off into space — THAT is a lovely idea that I think secretly the vast majority of us want to achieve, you know? “Star Trek” will live forever.

    Rod Roddenberry (son of “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry; executive producer, “Star Trek: Discovery”): You probably can’t put this, but I think my dad would say, “Holy sh*t, this is amazing!” You know, he used to do something pretty funny. He would get on stage, and he would fold his arms and kind of look at the audience and say, “Yep, just the way I planned it!” in a joking sort of way. But I know he’d be honored and thrilled, and he’d want to give so much credit to the fans. I think he’d be blown away by it, absolutely.

  • 21 Things You Never Knew About ‘Transformers: The Movie’

    The best “Transformers” movie is still the first one.

    No, not Michael Bay‘s excessive ode to explosions and plot holes. We’re talking “Transformers: The Movie,” released this week 30 years ago (time to feel old, everyone!).

    Optimus Prime took his fight against the Decepticons to the big screen for the first time in the summer of ’86, resulting in new toys kids forced their parents to buy. It also spawned legions of fans worshipping this animated favorite that introduced us to the sweet, sweet stadium rock that is Stan Bush’s “The Touch.”

    In honor of this nostalgia-soaked, feature-length toy commercial celebrating its 30th anniversary, here are some facts straight from Autobot City (reference!) that you need to know.1. For an animated movie aimed at kids, “Transformers” has a crazy-high body count. This is because Hasbro wanted to clean house and introduce a new toy line to coincide with the launch of Season Three. (The movie served as a bridge between the second and third seasons.)

    2. Early drafts of the script featured even more deaths. The biggest on-screen RIP that still rocks kids’ souls? Optimus Prime. The Autobot leader was killed battling his nemesis, Megatron, and that sparked a backlash among fans — one so loud that it influenced changes in Hasbro’s other big animated movie being made, “G.I. Joe: The Movie.” The Joes’ first big-screen outing featured the death of their leader, Duke, but Hasbro forced the filmmakers to change Duke’s fate, instead having him enter a coma after getting a snake spear to the heart. Because the ’80s.
    3. The debate over whether or not to kill Prime caused “steaming arguments” among the filmmakers, according to screenwriter Ron Friedman — who was violently against killing this “father figure” and “icon.”

    “To remove Optimus Prime, to physically remove Daddy from the family, that wasn’t going to work,” Friedman said. “I told Hasbro and their lieutenants they would have to bring him back but they said ‘no’ and had ‘great things planned.’ In other words they were going to create new more expensive toys.” Those lieutenants belonged to Hasbro’s ad agency, who graduated to having great power overseeing the production of various projects. So blame the suits for your childhood trauma!

    4. There was an alternate script at one point for the movie, entitled “The Secret of Cybertron,” written by “Transformers” story editor and writer Flint Dille, that very few people have seen. 5. Two things that writer Friedman had to fight to get into the movie: Arcee (above), the first female Autobot, and having the Transformers interact with humans Spike and his son, Daniel.

    6. The only rewrite that Friedman object to was including the word “sh**.” But the powers-at-be insisted it be added so the movie could secure a PG rating instead of a G, as films rated with the latter didn’t play as often in theaters.
    7. The Autobots’ Matrix of leadership, the shiny thing Prime passes on to rookie Hot Rod (pictured), was inspired (naturally) by the Petrean Touch in Catholicism.

    8. “Transformers: The Movie” was Orson Welles‘ last film. He voiced the transforming, planet-sized threat, Unicron. How did the production secure the Hollywood legend? “He was available,” said Friedman. “He was looking for work all the time. He would’ve opened a supermarket. He was eminently available.”9. Welles’ is rumored to have died five days after completing his final voice session for the film. Due to the actor’s breathing difficulties, his voice heavily synthesized.

    10. An early version of the story featured the Decepticons taking over Autobot City on Earth, with Blaster leading a group of guerilla-like fighters to retake the city. According to Friedman, it was cut simply because the suits wanted to cut it in an attempt to exert some creative control.
    11. Leonard Nimoy provided the voice for new villain Galvatron (above). The late actor would return to the world of Transformers, this time voicing Sentinel Prime in 2011’s “Transformers: Dark of the Moon.

    12. Friedman’s favorite characters to write for? Autobot veteran Kup, Starscream and, of course, Optimus Prime.
    13. Friedman’s least favorite? “Wheelie was a pain in the ass.”

    14. Marvel published an adaptation of the movie. The three-part comic was based on an early version of the script, and as a result the comics featured an different design of the Matrix and a different death for Autobot Ultra Magnus. 15. The movie’s most iconic song is Stan Bush’s “The Touch,” which — you might wanna sit down — was originally created by Bush and ‘co-writer Lenny Macaluso for Sylvester Stallone‘s “Cobra” in 1986.

    16. Like the soundtrack’s other memorable songs, like “Nothing’s Gonna Stand In Our Way” and “Hunger?” They’re from the band, Kick Axe, who appeared listed on the soundtrack as Spectre General because the powers-at-be thought the band’s real name sounded, um, too threatening. Worse? The band wasn’t even notified about the change.
    17. For the film’s 20th anniversary in 2006, IDW published its own adaptation. It includes extra scenes, such as a battle between the missing combiners and Omega Supreme at the Ark, as well as Shockwave and Reflector being destroyed by Unicron.

    18. Whenever Megatron would transform into gun mode during the first two seasons of the animated series, his first shot would always miss the target. Because reasons. In the movie, when Starscream uses his leader to execute Brawn, this marks the first time the Decepticon leader’s first shot hit the target.
    19. The movie takes place 20 years after the events of the series’ Season 2.

    20. Unicron’s original name? Ingestor. He would have been a mysterious being in control of Unicron’s planet form. The filmmakers combined the two into a single character, with the planet still transforming into a human-like figure.
    21. Unicorn in robot form originally featured more organic features. He would have rocked some serious ’80s long hair in addition to a goatee and mustache. (Please let it have been a mullet!)

    %Slideshow-416979%

  • Zachary Quinto Shares Sweet Tribute to Leonard Nimoy 1 Year After Death

    The great “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” Wednesday night to promote his new play, and he shared a loving tribute to the man he came to know as a friend:

    “We actually lost Leonard a year ago on the 27th of this month. So much love to him and his family, of course. I’ve never met somebody who so fully embodied a sense of fulfillment in their life. I really haven’t. He was such a tremendous artist and philanthropist and generous person and so intelligent. And I miss him all the time. I really miss him so much at this point, obviously, marking the anniversary of his passing. He was one of the greatest gifts that my career has brought into my personal life.”

    Zachary said Nimoy’s wife flew out to L.A. for the opening of his play, adding that she is as much a part of his life as the late actor was. “I feel really lucky to have known them on so many levels, for sure.”

    Here’s the full video:

    Zachary returns to the role of Spock in “Star Trek Beyond,” which is scheduled for release on July 22, 2016.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

    %Slideshow-89909%