
Arriving in theaters on Friday, March 8th, ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’ marks the return of the animated adventures for Jack Black’s martial arts panda. Revisiting the Valley of Peace after nearly a decade, the movie will need to prove itself even more than your average sequel.
Which has us asking, of course…
Is ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’ a Worthy Continuation of the Franchise?
There is good news to report for ‘Kung Fu Panda’ fans (Fandas?) –– the new outing, the first since ‘Kung Fu Panda 3’ in 2016 (not counting the TV spin-offs) is a frothy, diverting affair. While it suffers in not really having a great villain, the usual spirit of Kung Fu Panda lives on in this new offering.
Somewhat naturally that has a lot to do with the effervescent charm of Jack Black, who fully inherits and powers the role, but he’s backed up by an able assortment of returning and new performers.
Related Article: Jack Black Starring in Christmas Comedy ‘Dear Santa’ for The Farrelly Brothers
Script and Direction

The script, by Jonathan Aibel, Glenn Berger and Darren Lemke shows the hallmarks of writers who have plenty of experience with this world and its characters. Both Aibel and Berger have scripted the other ‘Panda’ films, while Lemke has worked on a few DreamWorks Animation movies, but also has experience on the likes of ‘Shazam!’ and ‘Goosebumps’ (the latter starring Black).
It is also helpful that while it certainly references the franchise’s past (the villain’s plot involves invoking old baddies to steal their powers and fighting styles to augment her own, and Po’s two dads receive their own subplot that eventually ties into the main story), it also has one eye on the future.
Having Po facing the dilemma of giving up being the Dragon Warrior –– a role and responsibility he has less grown into than more grown comfortable with –– while also being tasked with choosing a successor is a helpful, organic framework with which to plot new storylines. Because you just know if this one is a success, DreamWorks will want more.
Finally, it doesn’t hurt that the screenplay is light on its feet and features a number of solid gags, both one-off and runners that work well (one highlight is a guard at the big bad’s palace who points out the error in her plan until his colleagues demand he stops).

On the directing front, the movie’s in good hands with Mike Mitchell, who has plenty of experience on both the animated and live-action front and has proved to deliver regularly for DreamWorks.
Here working with co-director Stephanie Ma Stine, he proves to be the right person to bring this latest film to life, working with the animation and tech teams to find creative ways to explore action set pieces and getting the best out of the voice cast. Particularly impressive is a sequence set in the Jade Palace, where Black’s Po confronts crafty, thieving fox Zhen (Awkwafina) and multiple priceless antiquities are put at risk.
Yes, older audiences will see where the story is going from the minute the two leads meet, but the journey in this case is an engaging one.
Performances

With Black back in a role that he typically shines in, Po is his usual friendly, hungry self. There’s really not much to having the character work besides the actor’s energy and the occasional “Skidoosh!”, but Black makes it so that you’re happy following our hero along on his latest adventure.
Awkwafina, meanwhile, has been proving her voice-acting mettle in the last few years, working on projects for Disney and Illumination. If she finds her way into an English dub of a Miyazaki movie, she’ll have worked for most of the major animation companies releasing movies in the States.

Her Zhen is a lively, quick-witted type, the writers finding gags that work for her and the animators locking in on her offbeat energy.
Viola Davis fares less well as the villainous Chameleon. Her role is very much a standard scheming baddie with a magic plot to harness powers and rule… well, everything. Davis brings her usual gravitas to the part, but aside from some fun abilities once she goes through with her scheme, Chameleon is less memorable than, say, Ian McShane’s Tai Lung (the baddie from the first movie, here drawn back from the spirit world).
On the supporting front, the likes of Bryan Cranston, James Hong and Dustin Hoffman offer typically light-hearted spins on their characters’ schtick, while Ke Huy Quan makes an impression as Han, the king of thieves who factors into both Zhen’s backstory and the final act.
‘Kung Fu Panda 4’: Final Thoughts

Smartly focusing on just a few characters (some franchise faithful fans will be disappointed to learn that the Furious Five –– AKA the masters voiced by Seth Rogen, Jackie Chan, Angelina Jolie and Lucy Liu are conveniently busy off on their own missions, though they do show up for near wordless cameos right at the end), ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’ justifies this long-anticipated return to the venerable DreamWorks movie series, without too much of the cash-in effect.
It suffers from a less-than-fantastic villain, but if we’re honest, the bad guys are usually an excuse to give Po his latest mission. And between Black, Awkwafina and some of the other cast, it’s more crowd-pleaser than animated slog.
‘Kung Fu Panda 4’ receives 6.5 out of 10 stars.
81Dl1nufxH4vqqmxIbEoc6What’s the story of ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’?
After three death-defying adventures defeating world-class villains with his unmatched courage and mad martial arts skills, Po, the Dragon Warrior (Jack Black), is called upon by destiny to… give it a rest already. More specifically, he’s tapped to become the Spiritual Leader of the Valley of Peace.
That poses a couple of obvious problems. First, Po knows as much about spiritual leadership as he does about the paleo diet, and second, he needs to quickly find and train a new Dragon Warrior before he can assume his new lofty position.
Even worse, there’s been a recent sighting of a wicked, powerful sorceress, Chameleon (Viola Davis), a tiny lizard who can shapeshift into any creature, large or small. And Chameleon has her greedy, beady little eyes on Po’s Staff of Wisdom, which would give her the power to re-summon all the master villains whom Po has vanquished to the spirit realm.
So, Po’s going to need some help…
Who else is in ‘Kung Fu Panda 4’?
Alongside Black and Davis, the cast also includes Awkwafina, Dustin Hoffman, James Hong, Bryan Cranston, Ian McShane and Ke Huy Quan.

Other Movies Similar to ‘Kung Fu Panda 4′:
- ‘Kill Bill: Vol. 1‘ (2003)
- ‘Kill Bill: Vol. 2‘ (2004)
- ‘Kung Fu Panda‘ (2008)
- ‘Kung Fu Panda 2‘ (2011)
- ‘Kung Fu Panda 3‘ (2016)
- ‘Kubo and the Two Strings‘ (2016)
- ‘Raya and the Last Dragon‘ (2021)
- ‘Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank‘ (2022)
- ‘The Super Mario Bros. Movie‘ (2023)
At a loss for what to watch this week? From new TV, we’ve got you covered.
Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, and Gal Gadot are available for download this week: Zack Snyder’s superhero faceoff arrives on Digital HD June 28, ahead of the Blu-ray and DVD releases July 19. Both the theatrical cut and the Ultimate Edition — with 30 minutes of new footage in an extended R-rated cut — will be available in this week’s digital release.
Anna Friel stars in this British crime series that started airing in the U.K. in April and arrives on Netflix July 1. Friel’s former detective Marcella Backland is devastated when her husband leaves her and their two children. She ends up returning to the murder squad after 12 years away, but the serial killer she once investigated may be back, too. The series co-stars a who’s who of British TV, including “Downton Abbey” alum Laura Carmichael and “Game of Thrones” alum Harry Lloyd.
The most magically delicious competition show — always sweet, never bitter — returns July 1! This season already aired last year in the U.K. (as Series 6), but it’s just Season 3 to the PBS audience. In Friday’s premiere, 12 amateur bakers attempt to make Madeira cake, frosted walnut cake, and black forest gateau. Also, we’re guessing, judges Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood will offer some frosty glares of disapproval, and hosts Mel Giedroyc and Sue Perkins will present some quality “walnut” innuendo.



No one expects much to happen at the box office in February. And that’s how we get a surprise smash like “
“
All that acclaim is unusual for a horror film, and it led indie distributor A24 to go all out with its first big wide release for “The Witch.” Opening on 2,045 screens, “Witch” earned an estimated $8.7 million, good for fourth place. It also had the best per-screen average ($4,245) of any new wide release this weekend. Paradoxically, “Witch” didn’t impress ticketbuyers nearly as much as it did the critics; it earned a poor grade (C-) at CinemaScore. Guess the chilly atmospherics that impressed the reviewers didn’t do much for a horror audience that prefers frequent jolts and gore.
Sure, it’s hard to guess which movies will be big enough draws to pull people away from their living rooms on Super Bowl weekend. But the studios were wrong about nearly every new offering this weekend, and so were the box office analysts.
Sparks, the novelist whose tearjerking romances have been adapted into such hits as “
So, why did “Pride” fail to crack the top five, debuting with just an estimated $5.2 million, less than half of what experts predicted? Audiences didn’t think much of it, giving it an underwhelming B- CinemaScore. And critics didn’t think much of it either, with its 41 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. James isn’t really a box office draw; the success of “Cinderella” owes less to the “Downton Abbey” alumna than to Disney’s brand and marketing. Period horror also hasn’t been as big a draw lately as studios had hoped — (cough) “
Which brings us to the other factor: maybe the idea of female-oriented counterprogramming on Super Bowl weekend is outdated. Aside from “Dear John,” “Warm Bodies,” and 2008’s “
The math doesn’t add up.
Really, the makers of “Panda 3” should be pretty happy with the movie’s estimated $41.0 million take, even though that opening is on the lower-end of expectations. After all, it is a third installment and it comes nearly five years after the last one (an eternity for the kid-movie audience). That it did as well as it did — debuting at No. 1, claiming the third-biggest January opening ever — is a tribute to the strength of the franchise, the film’s positive reviews, and the weakness of the competition. It’s still the lowest opening of the three “Kung Fu Panda” movies, but the first two opened in the summer, not in the dead of January.
Imitating the successes of Januaries past was also a problem for
Plus, “Jane” is competing not just with other horse operas, but also with all the Oscar-nominated movies that are dominating the art-houses because — all together now — it’s January. And those movies are doing reasonably well. In fact, none of the holdovers in the top 15 slots on the chart lost more than 39 percent of last week’s business. The fact that there wasn’t a huge East Coast blizzard or NFL playoffs this weekend certainly helped, but still, such strong legs are a sign of good health for the box office overall.