Tag: entourage

  • ‘Entourage’s Kevin Dillon Talks Action Movie ‘Wire Room’

    Vr9fEuxW

    Opening in select theaters, on digital, and on demand beginning September 2nd is the new action movie ‘Wire Room’ from director Matt Eskandari (‘Hard Kill’).

    The new movie stars legendary actor Bruce Willis (‘Die Hard’) as Shane Mueller, a Homeland Security agent who runs a wire room, which is a high-tech command center surveilling the most dangerous criminals. New recruit Justin Rosa (Kevin Dillon) is assigned to monitor a cartel member named Eddie Flynn (Oliver Trevena), and keep him alive no matter what.

    When a team of assassins attack Flynn in his home, Rosa goes against protocol and speaks with the gangster directly to save his life. As the armed soldiers ascend on the wire room, Mueller and Rosa make one last stand against the corrupt officers who want to destroy the evidence and murder them both.

    Actor Kevin Dillon has been working steadily in movies and on television for almost 40 years! He’s appeared in such acclaimed films as ‘Platoon,’ and ‘The Doors,’ both directed by Oscar-winner Oliver Stone, and on classic TV programs like ‘NYPD Blue,’ ’24,’ and ‘The Simpsons.’

    But the actor is probably best known for his role as Johnny “Drama” Chase on HBO’s hit series ‘Entourage’ and the movie adaption of the same name.

    Moviefone recently had the pleasure of speaking with Kevin Dillon about his work on ‘Wire Room,’ working with Bruce Willis, his approach to his character, the challenges of acting by himself at times, shooting the entire movie in one week, and exactly what a wire room really is!

    Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, 'Wire Room.'
    Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, ‘Wire Room,’ a Lionsgate release. Photo courtesy of Lionsgate.

    You can read the full interview below or click on the video player above to watch our interview.

    Moviefone: To begin with, how did you get involved with this project?

    Kevin Dillon: You know what? It was a straight up offer. The way I like them. Sometimes I have to audition for things. This was an offer. I read the script. I thought it had some cool plot twist and turns. I wanted to add as much humor wherever I could.

    They said, “Bruce Willis is going to do it,” the legend! So, I said, yes. I did a movie with Bruce before, but I didn’t get to act with him. This time I did. He’s great. I’m a big Bruce Willis fan, love the guy.

    MF: Can you talk about your research for this movie? Did you learn a lot about real wire rooms and how they work?

    KD: I knew nothing about wire rooms beforehand. I didn’t even know they existed. I didn’t have a lot of time to prep on it. Just for anyone out there, a wire room is when the CIA or the FBI has to have wires in certain rooms when they spy on people, they record it all in one room. That’s where my character finds himself, doing wire room duty. It’s his first day and things get crazy.

    MF: How would you describe your character and your approach to playing him?

    KD: I look at my character, Justin, as he’s a screw up. He used to work with the secret service. It’s backstory, it’s not in the script, but I like to think that he screwed up because he doesn’t listen. He won’t listen to what they tell him to do. I believe he got let go, and that’s why he is stuck working in a wire room, which is kind of like a demotion in a way. He, once again, doesn’t listen to Bruce and he gets in trouble again.

    Bruce Willis as Shane Mueller in the action film, 'Wire Room.'
    Bruce Willis as Shane Mueller in the action film, ‘Wire Room,’ a Lionsgate release. Photo courtesy of Lionsgate.

    MF: You have a lot of scenes in the movie where you are acting in a room alone or on the phone. Can you talk about the challenges of acting without another performer to play off of?

    KD: Yeah, it’s tough. It really is. Because you’re looking at screens and you’re seeing all this action that’s not there. It’s a blank screen, so you got to use your imagination a little bit. I was lucky to have Oliver Trevena come in and run lines with me, so we were able to kind of build up a little chemistry, even though we weren’t on film together.

    I thought he did a great job. I thought we had some chemistry. It was definitely challenging to do a movie like this. We did it in seven days. We did my stuff in five days, so, it’s unbelievable what we got done in that time period.

    MF: That’s shocking! Is that the fastest movie production you have ever worked on?

    KD: Well, I did a seven-day movie with the same production company, called ‘Hot Seat.’ That was amazing that we did that. These guys know how to get it done and they knew I could get it done, so they brought me in on this one. It’s a real challenge and I actually like stepping up to it. You got to really be on your game.

    Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, 'Wire Room.'
    Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, ‘Wire Room,’ a Lionsgate release. Photo courtesy of Lionsgate.

    MF: What was it like working with director Matt Eskandari on such a fast shoot?

    KD: Oh man, he’s the best. Very few guys could have done this. He’s open to ideas. He’s open to improv, and we had lots of that on the set. He just has a real vision. I saw it last night for the first time, I didn’t know all the things he had going on. He had a lot of cool directorial tricks. When the bombs go off, you actually feel dizzy from the bomb going off. I mean, he just did some really cool things as director.

    MF: Finally, the movie concludes in a way that is open ended, is this a character you would be interested in revisiting in the future?

    KD: Oh, hell yeah. Justin, he’s going to hunt him down. He said, “I will track you down.” And he’s a man of his words.

    Bruce Willis as Shane Mueller and Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, 'Wire Room.'
    (L to R) Bruce Willis as Shane Mueller and Kevin Dillon as Justin Rosa in the action film, ‘Wire Room,’ a Lionsgate release. Photo courtesy of Lionsgate.
    HvmdhD2Xi0S5ml7FqCKLc6
  • Constance Zimmer Gets Real About Hollywood, Fan Love, and ‘UnREAL’ Season 3

    It’s one of the most delightful aspects of a professional life in Hollywood: You can find your niche in the industry, do good work on good shows, and carve out a solid career for yourself. And then, one day, a certain special role on a certain special project clicks with a certain special audience, and just like that, you’re a superstar,

    Just ask Constance Zimmer.

    Zimmer’s been a familiar face appearing on dozens of television shows since she first hit the scene, especially after breakthrough roles in “Joan of Arcardia,” “Boston Legal,” and, most significantly, “Entourage” as studio exec/Ari Gold sparring partner Dana Gordon. An array of high-profile projects followed — including “Grey’s Anatomy,” “The Newsroom,” “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” and “House of Cards” — establishing the diversity of her range, but it took an unlikely pitch-black comedy on an even unlikelier cable network to shoot her into the stratosphere: as the deliriously manipulative dating show producer Quinn King on Lifetime’s “UnREAL,” Zimmer’s reveling on the role of her career, one that’s earned her an Emmy Award nomination and a degree of notoriety she hadn’t experienced before.

    As she preps to head into “UnREAL” Season 3, Zimmer can next be seen on the big screen in “”Better Things.”

    Moviefone: I’m sensing a pattern here in your work with “Run the Tide”: finding seemingly unsympathetic characters and making them surprisingly sympathetic.

    Constance Zimmer: Yeah, sure. I’ll take that. I’ll take it!

    What was the challenge here in figuring out who she was, owning the dark side, but showing that she did have the potential for some light side, too?

    Once again, it’s a character that I was scared of because of everything you just mentioned, but realizing that the characters that I’m afraid of are the ones that tend to have the biggest reward in the end, because you have to find what it is, who they were before they were broken. Because we all have that in us, but it’s been marred along the way from this, that or the other thing.

    Her stuff is very obvious, and I had to kind of go at her, again, [being] completely nonjudgmental. I had to find where the honesty and the truth was going to come from, and knowing that she really had to claw her way back up. I don’t think, for me, it was the reality that it wasn’t going to be as easy as she thought it was.

    So the awareness of becoming so, like, keen to knowing you’ve hurt people to a depth that you didn’t even know, made it such a more emotional journey than I thought. But always knowing that there was a light at the end of the tunnel was how I was able to know that in two hours I was going to be able to prove to these people that I had changed, I had learned, I had grown, and I was here. I was in it to win it now.

    We don’t get those chances in life. We have no idea what tomorrow brings. So in a movie like this, that I think helps too, to heal the character and heal the path.

    What was intriguing for you to work with a guy like Taylor Lautner — who could certainly coast on the audience that he already has, could coast on the superficial look or the people’s image of him — and to see him digging deep in a movie like this, seeing him broaden his range and his skill and come at it to work?

    I definitely think it was, again, one of the reasons why I wanted to do it because I was excited for him. Because I always find that a lot of these actors who have been put into these franchises at such a young age, without even knowing what it was going to do to them, or how it was going to catapult them into a specific area, and that he was so excited about this being nothing like he had ever done.

    I was so excited for him, and I wanted to be a part of it. I wanted to see it because I knew that if he could do it, he was going to do it big, because he was so committed and so into it, and all of us were. It’s a small film. It’s a small cast. Everybody has a story to tell and every character is so deep and so rich. So I knew that everybody that was signed on to the movie was kind of here to commit to these characters.

    You didn’t have a choice, and as dark and as messed up as some of them are, we had to all go in knowing that in the end there’s going to be hope. But it was super exciting to do a lot of those scenes with him too because he and I were so in it, and all I wanted was I wanted to give him everything. I wanted to give him every emotion so that we could do it together, and it was fun. It was fun and so emotionally draining every day.

    You’ve almost gotten Taylor’s experience in reverse. You’ve built a body of work: “Entourage,” I’m sure, got you recognized on the street and got you good tables in restaurants —

    Barely!

    Then this “UnREAL” comes along, and all of a sudden people are invested in you and they want to talk to you about that character and know about your personal life. So what was that like to have a new degree of fame enter the picture after you were a solid, professional working actor?

    It’s funny because I don’t really even necessarily think that I have any more or less than I’ve had. It’s just, yeah, more people care what I have to say, which has been weird. I take all of it as a compliment. I feel so grateful that I’ve been around for so long, and yet some people can say, “Where did you come from? I’ve never seen you before.”

    And I always say “Thank you.” Because you always have this fear of … it’s weird: right before I did “House of Cards,” I had this whole thing in my career where I thought everyone was done with me. They were like over me — like, “We’re over her, we’ve seen her in too many things, we’re done.” I was like, “That’s it. I had my time, my moment is over. And then I did “House of Cards” and it was like a whole different resurgence of sorts of characters in different outlets and all this kind of stuff.

    So that’s all I’m ever looking for, is to constantly grow through characters and shine light in dark characters that are really not the ones that people might jump to go, “Oh, I want to do that, I want to be in that blockbuster and look amazing and beautiful.” No, I’m really always for the underdog, because I’ve always felt I was an underdog, and I actually like being an underdog.

    So it’s been fun. It’s still shocking for me. If somebody comes up to me and says my whole name, I’m like, “Is that written somewhere? Is my name on a piece of paper and that’s why you know who I am?” Because still, I like being like a chameleon and not it being one thing in particular.

    Was there a fear factor when “UnREAL” came around to you?

    Of course there was! The big story on the block is how many times I turned it down, because it had to be done right, and it had to be done in a way that was going to be different. It being on Lifetime, and they hadn’t done anything like it before, we had to put all of our faith and all of our trust that they were going to do it the way that it needed to be done to break out into something more than just, like, “Hey, here’s a new show about behind the scenes of reality television.”

    What I like more about it, I was afraid that everyone was going to hate Quinn. So, again, I was playing a character that I was just like, “Oh God. Are they going to get me? What do I do?” But obviously I could not be happier. It’s really kind of superseded anything I think any of us had every hoped for or dreamed of happening with the show. Now, this season, we’re diving into another new territory of a female suitor. So I don’t know. It’s always exciting, and challenging, and scary, even the show has its cult status, it’s still scary.

    People have said what they wanted to say about Season 2 in comparison to Season 1. That must have been interesting, to go from being a total darling to “Hmm …”

    Yeah, but it’s OK. You know why? People cared, and that’s the way I saw it. I was like, “Wow, people really care about this show.” They care when we miss our mark, and that you don’t get very often, and yet people were still watching it, even though they were like, “Hmm, you kind of missed the mark on that, but I’m still going to watch the next episode.” And we all were taking it as a learning curve. I hope that this next season will bring it all back together cohesively.

    The table was really reset at the end of Season 2. There are so many different things that you can do. Have you had those creative discussions? Have they given you an awareness of what the overall picture is going to be like?

    Not yet. I’ve heard sprinkling of things. We’ll do that probably in the next month or so, and then we’ll see where they’re going to take us, and we’ll see if we agree.

    Are you excited to get back to work on it?

    I’m excited and I’m scared, but that’s why I love this part, because nothing is anticipated, and nothing is set. They’re loose cannons, all of them, and the show is a loose cannon. The characters are loose cannons. So it’s “What are we going to do?” I don’t know. I know what we’re doing, story point-wise, but how is that going to mix in the whole pot? It’s like a big stew, of sorts.

    And it’s one thing when they do put it on the page, and it’s another thing to make it come alive.

    Yes, yes. But I have to say, with “Run the Tide,” everything that was on the page was very much what was shot, because that’s why, when I read the script, I was like, “I see this. I know what this is. This is just dark, and emotional, and deep, and we just all have to go there every day.” But that was scary. So it’s not that the content was scary. It was about the emotional journey was scary.

    I have to ask you about probably your shortest job of the year, your audition waiting room scene on “Better Things.” A brilliantly funny scene. I’ve heard this story from Pamela Adlon, but tell me about it from your side when they came to you with it, and how you reacted to it, had said yes.

    [Laughs] It’s as simple as Pam texted me, and she’s like, “I have this really funny scene that I want to write in my show. I’m curious if you’d be willing to do it with me.” I was like, “What are you talking about?” So I called her and we talked about it, because she’s talked about it for years. We’ve talked about the fact that everybody thinks I’m her and she’s me, and I have gotten to the point where I just say, “Yes,” because I’m just so tired of trying to explain it to people.

    So she’s always said, “I swear one day I’m going to do something. I’m going to put both of us in a scene, and I’m going to prove to people we’re not the same person.” So here it was. Here was our moment. I was like, “Yes, what do you want me to do? Where do I go? I’m available, any time, anywhere,” and it’s the greatest thing. I keep saying to her, I was like, you realize you have to have an audition scene in every season, and we should just always look whatever the part is, because it doesn’t end. It doesn’t end today.

    She’s the face of a show. I’m the face of a show. People still — I was at the Emmys and somebody came up to me and said, “Your show is so amazing. I love you so much. I can’t believe you’re a mom with three kids.” I was like, “I’m not Pam Adlon.” She said, “Yes, you are.” I said, “No, I’m not, but thank you. I take it as a compliment.” So it’s fun. I love it. I love that kind of stuff.

    We’ll get to that scene where you guys beat out Julie Bowen for the part. I think that’s what we need next season.

    Yes. That would be great. That would be awesome. But the thing is, it’s real life. It’s kind of like, that’s what I think everyone was so amazed that we were willing to just show that that’s what it is. I’m like, “No, that’s what it is. It happens. It’ll happen tomorrow.” The second that I’m not on “UnREAL,” I’ll be right back there, right back there in those rooms, with the same girls. It’s just, that’s the truth.

    What great gig have you gotten as a result? Is there something coming up that we’re going to see you in that has kind of come as a result of the exposure that you got on “UnREAL”?

    No, because I’m still doing “UnREAL,” and so my window of opportunity is small. We do such a big press tour on that show as well. So there’s times and moments where I just kind of want to exist in my life and I kind of don’t take anything, or want to take anything.

    For me, it’s more going to be about, like, when “UnREAL” is over. I’d like to then, once again, try and find that character that is different from what I’ve just done. I’d love to go to like a straight full-on comedy and just flip everybody’s heads from being dramatic and so strong, and all of that fun stuff. For me, right now the greatest reward has been getting the Emmy nomination and getting the Critics’ Choice Award. Those are the greatest things so far that are coming to me through this show that I never anticipated.

    From the Emmy experience — It’s a surreal thing. Any aspect of the awards ceremony process is super-surreal. So give me a stand-out crazy memory from being part of it all.

    I have to say, it’s when you are walking, when you’re doing the red carpet that is all the on-camera interviews, and you’re passing people like Henry Winkler and Padma Lakshmi. It’s like this whole crazy mix of so many different people from different parts of the entertainment world, and it’s as if you’ve all known each other and you’re best friends. We’re all here for the same reason.

    It becomes this love fest. I never thought … I couldn’t get through the crowds because everybody was like, “I’m so excited for you! This is a long time coming! You deserve it!” And I was like, “Hi, nice to meet you.” It was this overwhelming, for me, sense of love and appreciation that is not necessarily what you are around every day in this business.

    So that for me was unbelievably heartwarming and it was probably one of the greatest times because
    that’s a long carpet to get down. It was every step was somebody new, or somebody I’ve known in my career for 25 years that’s like, “We’re here! We did it!” That, to me, it was like I could have stood on that carpet for days and just been like, just crying.

  • Adrian Grenier Angers Fans With Now Deleted 9/11 Post

    The VeThe Internet is still lashing out at <a href=“Entourage” star Adrian Grenier for the tribute he posted on social media on Friday, September 11.

    In the now-deleted Instagram post, Grenier wrote, “R.I.P. the 2,996 Americans who died in 9/11. R.I.P. the 1,455,590 innocent Iraqis who died during the U.S. invasion for something they didn’t do.”

    This struck some readers as “disrespectful” and “classless,” although others agreed with his sentiment and debated attackers in the comments. Grenier deleted the original post — keeping up his other, less controversial 9/11 tributes — which upset some of the people who respected his defense of the innocent Iraqis and did nothing to stop the people who were already outraged.

    For example, here are some comments — posted with another photo — that seem to be about the deleted image:

    bless you, but your spineless liberal ass then deleted it because you have NO BALLS!! Hahaha. You disrespectful fuck, you should move to Iraq and make movies there, I bet they would support you or atleast cut your head off on live TV

    Your a faggot that deserves to die in hell

    I was watching entourage but now I’m not cause ur in it

    Vinny chase u fucked up

    Lol American are crying u cuz of his post ???????????? all what he did is posting the truth does it really hurt that much I mean the truth ????????

    As a U.S. Marine innocent Iraqis kiss my ass u could walk in my boots wtf have u done for this country if I ever meet you if kick u in ur mangina cause you are a punk birch

    Another Career ended. I will not support anything that you are involved with. Your career just took a turn like the Dixie Chicks straight to the toilet.

    YOU SUCK

    Thank you for what you said. Sad there’s so much hate shows how sensitive not just 9/11 but also how sensitive people are to the Iraq war. If it wasn’t for the Iraq war a lot of things would have been prevented including Isis, their creators met in Americans prison. They were marginalized and radicalized in under the U.S.

    Wow. Well, at least it’s sparking a debate. Extreme reactions, like these, can cause a chilling effect where people no longer share their opinions, which is kinda sad when this country is all about free speech. But free speech goes both ways, and at least Grenier got a few people to exercise that right on an important day.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-318692%

  • Director Says ‘Entourage’ Sequel ‘Unlikely in My Lifetime’

     

    Ent1It doesn’t look like the boys will be back any time soon.

    Doug Ellin, the director of “Entourage,” said Wednesday he held little hope of making a sequel to the big-screen version of the HBO series.

    “Unlikely in my lifetime,” Ellin told a Twitter follower asking about the prospects of an “Entourage 2.” He said he’d be open to accepting script ideas for the sequel “but someone would need to find 25 million dollars to make it.”

    Made with a reported budget of about $30 million, “Entourage” brought in a disappointing $32 million in the United States, according to Box Office Mojo. It starred Adrian Grenier, Kevin Connolly, Jerry Ferrara, Kevin Dillon and Jeremy Piven and was produced by Mark Wahlberg.

    vDvD0vmfu0cHSwr8XtYQQ
  • Ronda Rousey to Star in Her Own Biopic ‘My Fight/Your Fight’

    Ronda Rousey (left) fights Bethe Correia
    Ronda Rousey (left) fights Bethe Correia

    UFC fighter Ronda Rousey landed what could be her biggest hit yet. The athlete-actress will star in her own biopic based on her New York Times best-selling autobiography “My Fight/Your Fight,” Variety reports.

    The MMA star “was always keen in starring” in the movie adaptation of her book, Variety notes, adding that it’s unusual for a movie studio to make such a deal with a relatively unexperienced actress, however Paramount is equally impressed by her abilities in the Octagon as well as her onscreen credits.

    Previously Rousey has had big screen roles in “The Expendables 3,” “Furious 7” and
    “Entourage,” appearing as herself.

    On Saturday she impressed sports fans after knocking out opponent Bethe Correia in 34 seconds during a match in Brazil. In March she went viral after a 14-second knockout fight against Cat Zingano.

    vDvD0vmfu0cHSwr8XtYQQ
  • ​Is Hollywood Heading for a Summer Box Office Disaster?

    Spy” should have been more of a sure thing at the box office.

    The film, which reunites Melissa McCarthy with her “Bridesmaids” and “The Heat” director, Paul Feig, entered the weekend with good buzz, great reviews and modest competition. Pundits guessed it would open as high as $35-40 million.

    Its actual opening, estimated at $30.0 million and good for first place, is nothing to sneeze at. Still, a debut that’s as much as $10 million off expectations for such a seemingly can’t-miss movie has to rate somewhere between disappointing and troubling.

    “Spy’s” underperformance wasn’t the only ominous sign at the box office. Horror prequel “Insidious: Chapter 3” opened on the low end of expectations, premiering in third place with an estimated $23.0 million. “Entourage,” which started out strong with a mid-week Wednesday opening of $5.7 million, was supposed to make $17 to $20 million over the weekend — not bad for a poorly-reviewed, R-rated adaptation of the HBO series that went off the air four years ago. But the continued adventures of Vinnie Chase and his “Bro-pack” eventually underwhelmed, debuting in fourth place with an estimated $10.4 million for the weekend. (Its five-day take is estimated at $17.8 million.)

    Overall, the box office was down 4.4 percent from last week — which in turn was down 10.3 percent from the weekend before, which declined 16.4 percent from the weekend before that. These declines come as the numbers from May reveal a box office that’s 17.7 percent behind last year. That’s despite such huge May 2015 hits as “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” “Pitch Perfect 2,” and “San Andreas.” Then again, even “Ultron” didn’t open as big as it was supposed to or maintain the momentum of the previous “Avengers.” (At this point in its run, 2012’s “The Avengers” had earned $577.9 million, $139.9 million more than “Ultron.”)

    If this trend keeps up, the summer box office will end up $718 million behind last summer’s $4.1 billion take. That would be a disaster for an industry whose bread and butter is summer earnings, particularly from big-budget spectacles that are about all Hollywood knows how to market anymore.

    What’s behind the unenthusiastic response to this summer’s movies? Here are five conclusions the studios can draw from the summer so far.

    1. You Can’t Count on Star Power
    McCarthy has done well in the past as part of an ensemble, or paired with at least one other star who’s a current draw (Sandra Bullock, for example). But on her own? Not so much. Last summer’s “Tammy” did earn some $84.5 million overall, but it was all McCarthy’s show, and it didn’t earn the dollars or the reviews that her teamwork movies have.

    Similarly, “Tomorrowland” boasted George Clooney‘s best opening in years, but his name alone wasn’t enough to sell the movie across the board. Neither was Reese Witherspoon (or Sofia Vergara, the highest-paid actress on TV) for “Hot Pursuit.” About the only stars who’ve helped sell tickets this summer are Anna Kendrick (“Pitch Perfect 2”) and Dwayne Johnson (“San Andreas”), and both were relentless in promoting their movies on TV and in social media.

    2. You Can’t Count on Counter-programming
    For months, this column has argued that counter-programming is no longer an effective strategy, whether you’re putting out a female-driven film on a weekend where a male-driven movie is expected to dominate, or vice versa.

    Certainly, guys weren’t drawn to the testosterone-heavy “Entourage” just because “Spy” has a female lead. In a way, this is actually good news. After all, “Spy,” “San Andreas,” and “Ultron” have succeeded in part because they appealed to both men and women. There have been a lot of (justified) complaints about Hollywood sexism in recent months, complaints about the relative lack of work for women both in front of and behind the camera, but at least the industry is starting to wake up to the fact that women buy movie tickets, too, and maybe it would be a good idea to take their tastes into account.

    3. Moviegoers Have Short Memories
    Mad Max: Fury Road” had some of the best reviews of the year, featuring stars Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron, and was a big-budget action spectacle meant to appeal to men and women alike. It’s earned a pretty good $130.8 million in four weeks. But it must have disappointed any industry observers who expected it to do better because it was based on a familiar franchise. After all, the last installment was 30 years ago, with another male lead. (What was his name, again?)

    Similarly, no one went to see “Poltergeist” ($44.5 million in three weeks) just because it’s a reboot of a horror classic from 33 years ago; indeed, any moviegoer old enough to have fond memories of the original film or its 1980s sequels was likely disappointed with the new version. Hollywood has a tendency to mine any known title for the sake of a little brand familiarity, but after a certain number of years, that doesn’t matter to young moviegoers who don’t revere the original, nor to old moviegoers who fear their fond memories will be tarnished by the updated version. Which is one of the few clouds on the horizon for next week’s “Jurassic World,” a franchise reboot that comes 14 years after the previous installment.

    4. The “Originality” Problem
    Audiences say they’re tired of retreads and sequels, but when an original movie like “Hot Pursuit,” “Tomorrowland,” or “Aloha” hits theaters, viewers don’t show up — or, in the case of “Spy,” don’t show up in droves as expected.

    Pundits have seen these results as a sign that original movies don’t work, but they’re really just a sign that original movies don’t work if they’re not well-made or well-marketed. “San Andreas,” derivative as it is, did fine. Hopes remain high for upcoming original films “Inside Out” (the Pixar name should be enough to sell it) and Amy Schumer‘s much-buzzed comedy “Trainwreck.” And it’s worth noting that some of this summer’s most successful (or most likely to succeed) sequels — “Ted 2,” “Magic Mike XXL,” “Minions” — are from franchises that started out as original films. The sequels should work just as well as the first installments did — if they’re properly executed, and if marketers don’t drop the ball.

    5. Anticipation
    Some pundits theorize that moviegoers are staying home until the premieres of the films they really want to see — next weekend’s “Jurassic World,” perhaps, or “Inside Out” on June 19. Until then, they’re saving their money. Why blow your comedy dollar on “Spy” if you can see “Ted 2” in three weeks? Or why see “Poltergeist” when “Insidious: Chapter 3” is opening two weeks later? That seems to be the argument, though “Poltergeist” opened almost as big as “Insidious,” with $22.6 million, before dropping like a rock in the two weekends since.

    In the end, it should just be as simple as making movies people actually want to see, and getting the word out about them to drum up interest. There just haven’t been many movies so far this summer that people wanted to see as much as they wanted to see last year’s “Maleficent,” “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” and “Godzilla.” At least two of those films were well-made, and all of them were well-marketed. This summer still has three months left to go. CGI dinosaurs and CGI potty-mouthed teddy bears may be enough to make up for May slackness, but if not, Hollywood had better cross its fingers that it has more to offer this summer that will entice viewers out of their living rooms.

  • 16 Movie Friend Groups That Are the Ultimate Squad Goals

    %Slideshow-293110%
    Some of the best relationships to hit the big screen have nothing to do with romance and everything to do with platonic love. With the release of the “Entourage” movie coming up, we figured now was the perfect time to reminisce about our favorite cliques from film. Find out if yours made the list!

    These are the 16 movie groups that made us wish we could jump into our screens just to hang out with them.

  • 16 ‘Entourage’ Cameos You (Probably) Forgot About

    %Slideshow-293107%
    It seems like every actor working in Hollywood with a few hours to spare appeared on an episode of “Entourage” at some point. The HBO hit had dozens of cameos and guest stars throughout its eight-season run, so if you weren’t cast as a client of Ari Gold’s or a Vincent Chase hook-up, apparently you were nobody in the mid-2000s. The “Entourage” movie hits theaters this week and is set to be chock-full of famous faces. Before the boys are back on the big screen, look back at some memorable (and not so memorable) cameos from “Entourage”s star-studded history.

  • The 21 Greatest Movies Based on TV Shows

    %Slideshow-292529%
    HBO’s bro fest, “Entourage,” is the latest television series to hit the big screen. It joins a long list of network and cable offerings to find a second life at a theater near you.

    Before you brave the popped-collar’d adventures of Team Vinnie Chase, here are 21 movies based on TV shows you need to see.

  • The 29 Most Epic Movie Cameos

    %Slideshow-292498%
    When “Entourage” hits theaters on June 3, it comes with a boatload of celebrity cameos, including Liam Neeson and Tom Brady. This is both a tradition for the HBO series-turned-feature film and for Hollywood itself, having stars pop up unexpectedly in films — especially in “The Muppets” and any comedy with Will Ferrell, Ben Stiller or Mike Myers.

    It was hard work, but we narrowed down our list of movie cameos to some of the biggest, most memorable cameos of all time. SPOILERS, obviously, for “This is the End,” “Zombieland,” “Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues” and more.