Tag: doctor-strange

  • ‘Doctor Strange’ Sequel Brings Horror to MCU

    Benedict Cumberbatch in 'Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness' from Marvel Studios.
    Benedict Cumberbatch in ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’ from Marvel Studios.

    Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness‘ is shaping up to be a major first for the MCU. But, not in ways that people expect. The upcoming sequel, which is directed by Sam Raimi, will be the first horror movie set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

    While this may not seem like a major upheaval of the formula Disney and Marvel have going, it could mean a change for the better for the future of the MCU and how Disney approaches its very heavily family friendly franchise.

    Before we get into the MCU present, it’s important to note that Marvel has attempted to make horror movies in the past, outside of the Marvel Cinematic Universe brand. Marvel was dipping into the genre all the way back in 1998 with ‘Blade,’ and one can even argue 2007’s ‘Ghost Rider.’ Both films being massive successes, and ‘Blade’ being a stepping-off point for Marvel creating more comic book films in the future.

    3695

    When most people hear of a film so successful that it allowed Marvel to continue making movies, one wouldn’t think it was a ‘Blade,’ which was dark, violent and a horror film about a B-tier superhero. Not something as big as ‘Iron Man,’ or ‘Captain America.’ While you can easily explain this away as Marvel dipping its foot into the supernatural horror craze of the era, you can’t ignore the impact the film had on the superhero genre going forward.

    Now, what does this mean for the current MCU? While we have a ‘Blade’ film currently in development, it will not be the franchise’s first horror film. But that doesn’t mean ‘Multiverse of Madness’ can’t help influence the tone the film might end up having. But to get to the bottom of that, we have to talk about the movie’s two different directors.

    The first ‘Doctor Strange,’ released in 2016, was directed by Scott Derrickson, one of the prolific horror directors of the 2010s. The mind behind ‘Sinister‘ and ‘Deliver Us from Evil,’ both of which are incredibly terrifying and disturbing. While ‘Doctor Strange’ was a different project for him, it shared similarities with what he had done before. Surreal-sometimes scary-imagery, and otherworldly evil. You can’t argue that ‘Doctor Strange’ just felt different then everything in the MCU that came before it.

    20060089

    Even with something incredibly different, ‘Doctor Strange’ still was a hit, making $677.7 million at the box office. The numbers don’t lie; audiences enjoyed, well, the strange (no pun intended) and weird. As we’ve seen before, Marvel listens to the box office and the viewers. So, what does that mean for ‘Multiverse of Madness?’

    Enter Sam Raimi, and finally, why a horror movie could lead the MCU in the perfect direction. A lot of MCU fans know Raimi was the director of Marvel’s original ‘Spider-Man’ trilogy. But many more know him as the director of the iconic comedy-horror franchise, ‘The Evil Dead,‘ which was violent, funny and most importantly, scary. Everything that Marvel can use.

    Raimi is quite possibly the best director that can integrate horror into the superhero genre. Many consider the original ‘Evil Dead’ a great first-time horror film, and a great lead into the spooky and the scary. And while ‘Spider-Man’ was a long way from being scary or terrifying, Raimi has shown his props in both genres.

    Director Sam Raimi at San Diego Comic-Con
    Director Sam Raimi at San Diego Comic-Con.

    Horror is very moldable. We’ve seen everything from psychological horror, to comedy, to even humor driven towards the young adult genre. Horror can be done without being terrifyingly scary, which is what I believe to be a major misconception the filmgoing audience has, and is prominent in how people are handling the ideas of ‘Multiverse of Madness’ being a horror film.

    When one looks at horror, all they see is jump scares or brutal, gory violence. But horror can be used in so many ways, some of which has already been shown in the trailer. Everything from dimensional beings such as Gargantos (which in the film bears a striking resemblance to Lovecraft-inspired monsters) and even from everything we’ve seen, Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) herself, which one can argue is a take on the monstrous feminine trope.

    What I’m trying to get at here is that Marvel would be really giving up something special if they don’t go full-in with the horror route. Horror is a genre that is very rarely touched in big name franchises like this, but the MCU has shown it’s not afraid to dip its toes into experimental works, with ‘Eternals‘ being a huge example of this.

    7ntA9bxQAz88yPJhNae7O1

    But as we know, horror can scare away an all-ages audience. You alienate an audience by deviating too far from the mold, and this does seem too far to the normal viewer. This is all leading up to the reason why Marvel adding horror into such a huge franchise is fantastic.

    While early, they’ve shown that horror isn’t something they’re afraid to dive into to fit the source material. If ‘Blade’ had been released with no vampires save for Blade himself, how would that have worked? Or if the Spirit of Vengeance’s skull in ‘Ghost Rider’ was incredibly dumbed down and not realistic? For both films, the horror would have been pretty much non-existent and it would lose the point of the adaptation in the first place.

    Doctor Strange’s comics have always been weird and otherworldly. And while the first movie tackled that fantastically, the second film has a chance to continue. The first movie can be considered a toe-dip, inching people into the idea of an even freakier and out-there sequel. They’ve seen what the world looks like, now what if we go deeper?

    Benedict Cumberbatch in 'Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness' from Marvel Studios.
    Benedict Cumberbatch in ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’ from Marvel Studios.

    While going deeper keeps it close to the comics, it also helps audiences open to the idea of this sequel breaking genre expectations. While you’d have trouble calling the first movie “scary”, that leaves ‘Multiverse of Madness’ open to pick up that mantle. And as we discussed, Marvel has a crazy number of angles they can take this from.

    But let’s also look at how crazy appealing this can make the horror genre. While we have had superhero horror films in the past, they have been considered cult. ‘Multiverse of Madness’ has a huge chance to change that, welcoming so many viewers into a genre that would have once scared them off, now having them in with open arms.

    It can also show that horror doesn’t just need to be for adults, and can create something that nearly every audience can lose themselves in, without returning home with nightmares (at least I hope not!) With ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness,’ Marvel seems to be setting up their chance at branching out into other genres and experimental plans in the process.

    Whether this works out or not is still to be seen, but I think if any company can pull off getting a massive audience into a new genre of film; it’s Marvel. And I can’t wait to see how spooky they take it!

    Yn5kjVbedpQ4FE8rL2agE6
  • ‘Doctor Strange 2’ On the Way With Scott Derrickson Returning to Direct

    ‘Doctor Strange 2’ On the Way With Scott Derrickson Returning to Direct

    Disney/Marvel

    Things look promising for Stephen Strange, who wasn’t too healthy at the end of “Avengers: Infinity War.”

    The time-traveling, space-bending Doctor will be back in a second film and so will Scott Derrickson, who co-wrote and directed the first film.

    THR reports that Derrickson has “quietly finalized a deal” to return to direct. It doesn’t sound like he’ll be involved in the writing this time as the search for a writer is “about to get underway.”

    Of course, Benedict Cumberbatch will be back as the mystic doctor, as will Benedict Wong as librarian and sidekick Wong. Rachel McAdams, who played Stephen Strange’s woefully underused love interest, is likely to return as well, per THR.

    While we’ve yet to see how the fates of The Avengers and their allies will play out in “Avengers: Endgame,” announcing a sequel for a particular character is certainly a good sign.

    THR speculates that we’ll get “Doctor Strange 2” in May 2021.

    Before being recruited by Marvel, Derrickson made his bones with horror films such as “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” and “Sinister.”

    No word from Derrickson himself on Twitter today. Yes, he’s still on Twitter, despite threatening to leave following some altercations with critics whom he called out for not loving “Bohemian Rhapsody.”

    [Via THR]

     

  • ‘Avengers 4’ Will Bring Back Another Unexpected (Dead) Marvel Character

    Marvel

    Looks Marvel characters left and right are coming back from the dead in “Avengers 4.”

    Last week, actor Frank Grillo teased that his character Crossbones (who died in “Captain America: Civil War”) will make a surprise appearance in “Avengers 4.” Now, one of the movie’s producers has revealed the return of yet another dead character — “Doctor Strange” mentor The Ancient One, played by Tilda Swinton.

    At a panel during the Austin Film Festival, “Avengers 4” executive producer Michael Grillo and screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely were discussing the complicated logistics of scheduling so many major stars for the shoot when Grillo casually dropped this bomb.

    “When we got Tilda Swinton, she was just a one-day availability,” he said.

    Swinton’s The Ancient One mentored Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) before being killed by evil sorcerer Kaecillus (Mads Mikkelsen).

    Like Crossbones, The Ancient One could appear in a flashback. Or as many fans suspect, the movie will play with timelines, so perhaps she comes back in a different way. In any case, it definitely seems like “Avengers 4” will be even more star-packed than expected.

    “Avengers” opens in theaters May 3, 2019.

  • ‘Doctor Sleep’ Adds 3 More, Including Wendy Torrance and Dick Halloran From ‘The Shining’

    ‘Doctor Sleep’ Adds 3 More, Including Wendy Torrance and Dick Halloran From ‘The Shining’

    The Shining
    Warner Bros.

    Heeeeere’s “The Shining” sequel!

    Doctor Sleep,” follow-up to Stephen King’s “The Shining,” just cast three more actors to join Ewan McGregor as adult Danny Torrance.

    It was already revealed that Rebecca Ferguson was signing on as cult leader Rose the Hat.

    Variety reports that Zahn McClarnon (“Fargo,” “Westworld”) is in talks to play Crow Daddy, right-hand-man and lover of Rose the Hat.

    Deadline added two more names, which will be familiar to “The Shining” fans:

    Carl Lumbly (“Supergirl,” “Alias”) will play Dick Halloran, with Alex Essoe (“Starry Eyes,” “Midnighters”) as Wendy Torrance. In Stanley Kubrick‘s 1980 film, Scatman Crothers played Dick and Shelley Duvall played Danny’s mother Wendy.

    Here’s a “Doctor Sleep” synopsis, via Deadline:

    “‘Doctor Sleep’ begins as Torrance carries the trauma of the Overlook Hotel into adulthood. He’s become a reflection of his murderous father, with lingering rage and a drinking problem that dulls his pain as well as his ‘shining’ powers. Those powers return when he embraces sobriety and uses his gift to help the dying at a hospice. He establishes a psychic connection with a young girl who shares his extreme abilities and is being targeted by a scary group with similar abilities. They’ve found that their powers grow if they inhale the ‘steam’ that comes off others with the power to shine, when they are suffering painful deaths.”

    “Doctor Sleep” is scheduled for release in theaters on January 24th, 2020.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Is ‘Doctor Strange 2’ Starting Pre-Production in September (to Replace ‘Guardians 3’)?

    Is ‘Doctor Strange 2’ Starting Pre-Production in September (to Replace ‘Guardians 3’)?

    Doctor Strange
    Marvel Studios

     

    We knew “Doctor Strange 2” was still in the works, but we didn’t think it would move this fast.

    Maybe it isn’t. All we have to go on right now is an Instagram post and Marvel Cinematic Universe speculation.

    But.

    The Instagram post comes from the director of the first “Doctor Strange” film, it includes a Doctor Strange comic image, and mentions “See you in September.”

    It could be that MCU fans are now way off the mark, and he was just using a DS image for something else — to say he’s taking a break on social media until September, or whatnot.

    But.

    Put together with more info from Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige, you don’t need to analyze 14 million different outcomes to think we’ll be seeing and hearing more on Benedict Cumberbatch‘s sequel in September — despite the situation Stephen Strange was left in at the end of “Avengers: Infinity War.” Whatever. Spider-Man has a sequel filming now too.

    Question: Is “Doctor Strange 2” being moved up on the filming schedule because of the whole James Gunn thing, or was whatever is happening in September always going to happen in September?

    Because Kevin Feige had told Collider in June that James Gunn had delivered a script draft for “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3” and “we begin official pre-production on that very, very soon. It’ll be shooting early next year.”

    But now that James Gunn has been fired … could “Doctor Strange 2” be sliding into the pre-production schedule?

    Scott Derrickson directed “Doctor Strange,” and he had just reposted the “Guardians” cast’s open letter of support for James Gunn. Shortly after that, he posted a photo of Strange appearing to kneel in prayer, adding this quote: “‘Not my will, but thine be done…’ See you in September.”

    https://www.instagram.com/p/Bl4o17el4z8/

    So is that a hint to pre-production starting in September for the “Doctor Strange” sequel? “Not my will, but thine” — Marvel/Disney’s will that it replace “Guardians 3” until this whole thing is resolved and we know what’s happening there? Total speculation on all fronts.

    Not even two months ago, Kevin Feige talked about doing another “Doctor Strange” movie during a chat with CinemaBlend on how he balances which characters get sequels and when:

    “Sometimes it’s where do those characters pop up? [Doctor] Strange, you know, whenever we do another Strange one, which we will do, it will be a number of years from the first Strange, and yet he’s a very big part of [Avengers:] Infinity War. So it is just a good problem to have when you have too many beloved characters that people want to see more of, whilst keeping to our core belief that we need to keep exploring nuance and keep doing different types of things.”

    At this point, Marvel hasn’t officially given anything a release date beyond “Spider-Man: Far From Home” on July 5, 2019. But “Guardians 2” was penciled in for 2020, and expected to take the May 2020 release date.

    Now everything is up in the air, but you can bet Marvel is not going to let the crews go without work because of the whole Disney mess, so someone is probably moving up the line while they figuring out what to do about “Guardians 3.”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Doctor Strange’ Is Still Getting a Sequel, Marvel Boss Confirms

    Of the 14 million possible outcomes Doctor Strange saw in “Avengers: Infinity War,” one of them had to be getting his own sequel. That must be the timeline we’re in now.

    “Infinity War” has turned all future Marvel Cinematic Universe conversations into immediate *SPOILERS*, but that’s just the game we’re playing until after “Avengers 4.” We have to recognize who got dust-busted while also recognizing that they will somehow be back for more movies.

    It wasn’t clear what would happen with Benedict Cumberbatch’s Stephen Strange after his 2016 movie, which made more than $677 million at the worldwide box office. “Ant-Man” got a sequel while making less money, but Paul Rudd’s Scott Lang also wasn’t shown getting vaporized in “Infinity War.”

    Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige talked about which characters are chosen for sequels, and how they schedule them, in a nice chat with CinemaBlend:

    “When you’ve got, what is it now, six, seven separate franchises? It’s part of the scheduling process. Sometimes when people ask, ‘What about this character, what about that character?’ I go, ‘Well, it’s scheduling.’ And they go, ‘What’s he talking about?’ Scheduling. How many years between movies can you have? You know, [Thor:] Ragnarok was four years. There’s four years between, right? He had an appearance in between there. So that seems to be maybe okay – sometimes, though, you want it to be less. Sometimes it can be more.

    Sometimes it’s where do those characters pop up? [Doctor] Strange, you know, whenever we do another Strange one, which we will do, it will be a number of years from the first Strange, and yet he’s a very big part of [Avengers:] Infinity War. So it is just a good problem to have when you have too many beloved characters that people want to see more of, whilst keeping to our core belief that we need to keep exploring nuance and keep doing different types of things.”

    The earliest we would see “Doctor Strange 2” is 2020. Next year is already booked with the trinity of “Captain Marvel,” “Avengers 4,” and “Spider-Man: Far From Home.” So far, 2020 has “Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3.” So there’s room for two more. Which two? The Black Widow movie seems to be aiming for 2020, but it’s not set yet. And then maybe “Black Panther 2”? A new character’s first film? Could “Doctor Strange” slip in that quickly or would it more likely be 2021 or 2022 for him?

    Feige has talked about having plans for Korg and Miek from “Thor: Ragnarok,” so they may be back for some kind of standalone, or as part of someone else’s film. Fans would love Shuri of “Black Panther” to get her own movie. There are so many options for supporting characters to break out, so it really has to be a tough chess game on Feige’s end to figure out which stories to tell when, and how to segue into the next one.

    Next up is “Ant-Man and the Wasp,” which opens in theaters next Friday, July 6.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Ant-Man and the Wasp’ Tracking for $75 Million Opening

    Ant-Man and the Wasp” has the tough job of following “Black Panther” and “Avengers: Infinity War” at the 2018 box office. The “Ant-Man” sequel is the 20th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but it’s not expected to be one of the major blockbusters of the franchise.

    That said, early tracking suggests “Ant-Man and the Wasp” will substantially outpace the first movie in its opening weekend.

    According to The Hollywood Reporter, the Paul Rudd/Evangeline Lilly sequel looks like it will make about $75 million at the domestic box office over the July 6-8 opening weekend.

    “Ant-Man” opened to just under $58 million in 2015, for a total domestic box office intake of $180.2 million, plus just under $340 million overseas for a global total of $519.3 million.

    Although it’s good to see the sequel will apparently top the original, TheWrap noted that it would make “Ant-Man and the Wasp” the first Marvel Studios movie since “Doctor Strangeopened to $85M to post a domestic opening below $100 million.

    That said, if “Ant-Man and the Wasp” gets a strong reaction from fans — and jumps ahead in time to include big hints on what’s ahead in “Captain Marvel” and “Avengers 4” — it could be a giant surprise at the box office. Sometimes lower expectations help!

    “Avengers: Infinity War” was always expected to crush at the box office, and it just passed $2 billion. It’s one of only four movies to have ever made that much money (not adjusting for inflation). “Avengers 4” is expected to make a similar killing, when it opens after “Captain Marvel” next spring.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • 32 Things We Learned on the Set of ‘Black Panther’

    Black Panther” is arguably the most special movie Marvel has made.

    At least that is the vibe one effortlessly picked up on when we visited the set last year. From the impressive cast to the inspired production design, everyone involved in director Ryan Coogler’s first comic book movie blockbuster conveyed a sense of how “special” and unique the film is, which hits theaters Feb. 16.

    From Black Panther himself, Chadwick Boseman, to his nemesis, played by Michael B. Jordan, Marvel generously allowed key members of the cast — and a few key behind-the-scenes department leads — to share their process (and a few awesome pieces of production art) with us. In doing so, they more than earned the last year of hype for this movie. It’s huge, it has a lot of emotional stakes driving it, and it’s Marvel’s version of a Bond movie/spy thriller, so that’s never not a bad thing.

    Here are a few things we learned from the set — along with some secrets revealed.

    Nate Moore, Producer:

    1. On where “Black Panther” takes place in relation to “Captain America: Civil War”: “It begins where ‘Civil War’ left off. So, obviously, that movie had a big impact on T’Challa because of T’Chaka’s death. So now we answer the question, What happens when he goes home? Who rules Wakanda? How does Wakanda now deal with the loss of a king?”.2. “We had a pretty blank slate,” said Moore in regards to how “Black Panther” was required to build from the events of “Civil War.” “We knew we were inheriting stuff from ‘Civil War.’ We had ideas of what we thought we could explore, and we sort of built it with Ryan and Joe Robert Cole, who wrote the script with Ryan. They had a lot of latitude to explore different ideas and put characters in and take them out. But it wasn’t, by any means, hemmed in by things that we’d thought of.

    3. A big plot point in the movie, according to Moore, is how Wakanda deals with the succession of a new king. “It’s definitely a big piece of the movie and we wanted to explore how succession works in Wakanda. Again, in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, what was clear in ‘Civil War’ and what we actually think was clear was that you could be king without being Panther and vice versa. So we always imagined T’Chaka was King but T’Challa already was Black Panther.”

    4. Fans can expect Erik Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan) to be a formidable presence: “In talking with Ryan, one of the ideas he also liked was this sort of ‘Godfather’-kind of story. When I say ‘Godfather,’ it’s the idea that it’s very much a story about family and a story about an organization where new leadership is taking place. And much like the ‘Godfather,’ you have to fight for things, right? And they’re all vying for power and in this case, it’s power over Wakanda. I think Killmonger sees Wakanda as something that could be used differently than it currently is in the Marvel Cinematic Universe — and that puts him directly at odds with T’Challa.”5. On how much the movie explores T’Challa’s past: “You get a little bit of a sense of what it was like before when he was a kid. Honestly, it’s not a huge part of the movie, but we did want to explore who he was before he was Panther.”

    6. According to Moore, the process of bringing director Ryan Coogler on board was very different from Scott Derrickson’s hiring on “Doctor Strange.” Where Derrickson had to prepare an elaborate pitch for his movie, Coogler was actively sought out by Marvel Studios.

    “We kind of watched ‘Creed’ and said ‘that guy.’ Then we hunted him down and made him say ‘yes.’ But it was hard. To Ryan’s credit, he obviously knew the character, and wanted to do the movie, but only wanted to do the movie if he felt like it was going to be something that would have integrity — that, at the end of the day, he felt good about as a filmmaker. And that’s what we wanted, as well.”

    7. The story evolved once Coogler was brought on board: “What he infused was a really good sense of the complications of being T’Challa and also really building out that supporting cast. One of the things that we love about the property is that there are so many interesting roles around Black Panther. Whether it be Ramonda, his mother; his sister, Shuri; Zuri, who is an advisor and a contemporary to T’Chaka’s and sort of a last link to his father. Ryan was really interested in exploring those relationships. Also, I think building out his relationship with the Dora Milaje, this group of all female, sort of Seal Team Six special forces women but making them all characters, making them all individuals rather than, again, this monolithic force of ass-kickers.”

    8. The advanced technology of Wakanda will play a big role in the film: “I think you’ll see all of it. The Golden City is, we think the most amazing city in the world in a way that also feels grounded. What we were very afraid of was making Wakanda almost too Kirby-esque, and by that I mean making it feel almost like they’re alien and not human. The truth is — they’re human. They’re just 20 or 25 years ahead of us. Having a city built on Vibranium allows them to have all these advances and have wealth beyond our wildest imaginings and that’s a big part of the movie.”9. On which specific Marvel comics inspired the film: “I would say the two runs that were most inspirational were the [Christopher] Priest and Ta-Nehisi [Coates] runs.”

    10. On whether T’Challa’s sister, Shuri, could be compared to Q from the James Bond movies: “To some degree. That’s a comparison we’ve made. We didn’t want it to be that one-to-one, but for sure she’s a big reason that T’Challa gets into gadgets in the film.”

    Chadwick Boseman

    11. Here is what T’Challa will be dealing with when the film opens: “What he’s dealing with is being the king, and making the transition to filling the footsteps of his father. So it’s probably going to feel like it’s more about the political unrest than the superhero initially.”

    12. Boseman on how he and the director developed and interpreted the character: “I think we have very similar views. We have very similar views about what things should be like, and the things that we usually have a difference of opinion about — it’s so minute, what those differences are, that I think it’s more of a growth because there’s nobody battling you. We’re constantly building on each other, so it’s been a good marriage so far.”13. What it is like working with such an impressive female cast, with Angela Basset playing his mom: “Obviously, you have Angela Basset here. She’s incredible to watch and, again, she’s always really strong. I would say, in this movie, because my father is dead, it gives me the opportunity to sort of look to her for wisdom. I think it shows the matriarchal African society in doing that, so she’s an advisor that I would go to. And it’s a close relationship, it’s not just like she’s my mother and she’s on the side — she’s not a figurehead mother.”

    Michael B. Jordan

    14. Here’s why Michael B. Jordan wanted to play a baddie: “For me, I wanted to kind of step outside of a comfort zone, and try something different, especially with Ryan — working with him again. I’d jump at the chance to get to work with him again. And I think one of the challenges for us, if we do our job the right way, is — hopefully — Killmonger is somebody you guys can root for, too. I think that’s something hard to accomplish, but if we all do what we’re supposed to do, I think that would be a really hard decision to make, to figure out who you want to root for. And I think it brings out the best in villains.”

    15. On how Coogler handles the action scenes: “As realistic as he can. I think one of Ryan’s strengths is that he always finds the real moments, even in a sci-fi or a larger-than-life kind of atmosphere and environment. So when it comes to boxing, he wanted real hits! He wanted it to look like if it was a brawl, it was gonna be a brawl. We really took our time with each punch, each punch represented a different line. So, in a sense, we’re having a scene and dialog within the fight. So that was something that I found very interesting. So for this one, a different approach, ’cause using a lot of weapons, and they’re also using a lot of hand-to-hand combat, so there’s a lot more action, so to speak. So, just trying to find the realness in the larger-than-life Marvel universe, I think that’s something that he’s definitely striving for.”

    16. Michael B. Jordan had no hesitation doing another comic book movie, following the failure of “Fantastic Four.”: “No hesitation, really, to do another comic book film. I’m a geek. I love this world. I love being able to play in that fantastic space. I looked at it as another shot to get it right, to do it again, especially with teaming up with Rachel [Morrison] again, and Ryan — it’s a very, very comfortable space for me. And it was the perfect space for me to take another risk like this. Yeah, it was no hesitation on that part.”

    Lupita Nyong’o

    17. Lupita reveals how her character, Nakia, is introduced: “I can say that… When we meet her, she is a war dog — which means she’s one of Wakanda’s CIA agents. Her job is to spy around the world and report back to Wakanda to keep Wakanda safe and keep Wakanda informed.”18. What she loved about her character’s treatment and the female characters in the script: “I would say that what Ryan [Coogler] and [co-writer] Joe Robert Cole have done with this film … deepened our understanding of the role of women in Wakanda. So, I think it’s legal for me to say that the women, as we meet them, are departures from what we know of them in the comic books.”

    19. Lupita on her character’s action scenes: “It is intense. I mean, I had dreams of being in an action film and stuff. I didn’t realize that it was going to change my diet. And require me to wake up at insane hours. This week alone — I woke up to workout at 3 in the morning, Which is ridiculous. But it’s been so much fun to challenge my body in this new way. Nakia’s fighting style is being informed by judo and ju-jitsu and silat, and stuff like that. So I’m learning all these cool skills and I get to jump higher than I thought I could jump. I get to roll backwards — which I thought I would never do after the age of 8? So it’s been fun.”

    20. What’s her working relationship like with Coogler: “Ryan is an incredibly collaborative director. And he’s very responsive to our needs. Our suggestions. So it really feels like team work when we are all on set.”

    Martin Freeman
    21. Freeman on his character’s function in this film, compared to “Civil War”: “He is the coolest man in the room. He has some authority. He’s good at his job. I think we’re going as realistic as you can be in a heightened universe. It would be slightly incredible for him not to be good at his job and not to be competent at this position that he’s at. He’s good at his job. He’s well traveled. He’s well versed in the ways of the world. Wakanda is gonna be a surprise to him.”

    “But, in terms of meeting diplomats, kings, that’s not particularly fazing to him. He meets superheroes, he meets, you know, so I think some of his humor comes from exasperation rather than… like that.”

    22. Freeman on his character’s relationship to Klaw: “What I like about being on the receiving end of Klaw is that you are on the receiving end of it, you know what I mean? Like, he’s going to do to you whatever he wants to do. There was no way that, I as Martin, or me as Ross, could top that. Then you would just have two insane f**king people going crazy and the scene wouldn’t contain it, but Andy is extremely good at that wrong footing, keeping you guessing stuff.”
    23. Freeman knew that “Civil War” would not be the last we saw of his character: “That was the idea, yeah. I don’t think I’m getting killed for that. Yeah, that was my understanding.”

    Andy Serkis
    24. Serkis, who plays the baddie Klaw, had no idea he would be back in the MCU until after “Age of Ultron”: “Klaw appears in ‘Age of Ultron,’ and the way that all happened was, they were actually working with the Imaginarium, which is my performance capture studio. We were working and consulting back on Ultron, working with James Spader and working with Mark Ruffalo, and initiating them into the process of motion capture, because they were both using performance capture and we were providing services for that.”

    “Then, Joss Whedon said, ‘Hey, this is crazy. Why don’t you come and be in the show?’ And it’s like, ‘Well, yeah, all right. That’d be fun.’ So that happened, and then of course, when this came along, I knew that he was part of the Black Panther story. It’s just really great being back.”

    25. Here’s what Klaw has been up to since we last saw him lose an arm: “He’s just been, basically, causing mayhem in the world, on minor and major levels. He’s a smart guy in the sense that he’s a businessman as well as an arms dealer. He manages to cover his tracks. He has a mercenary army that works with him in different locations all around the world, and he’s able to go down rabbit holes and appear other places, so he’s got the smarts, but he’s a little whacked out.”

    26. Fans can expect his signature arm weapon to come into play: “He obviously had his arm chopped off, and he has a weapon which we will discover.”

    27. Here’s how working on “Black Panther” compared to Serkis’ other big Hollywood franchises: “In the short time that I worked with Ryan, which is literally two days [as of the set visit], he creates the most incredible atmosphere on set. He really is the most … very subtle actor’s director. He knows what he wants but he allows you to play and explore with the other cast members, then gives great, very specific notes.”

    28. In this story, Klaw does not see himself as the baddie per se: “He thinks what he’s doing is existing in this world in the way that he’s created his own moral relativity, really. He is quite nihilistic, he’s squared it with himself, he knows life is cheap, and you’re either at the bottom of the pile or you’re at the top of the pile and that’s it. It’s very, very simple; it’s quite clear to him where his moral compass is.”

    Ruth Carter, Costume Designer
    Marvel Studios' BLACK PANTHER  Forest Whitaker as Zuri, Daniel Kaluuya as W'Kabi, Michael B. Jordan as Erik Killmonger, Lupita Nyong'o as Nakia, Chadwick Boseman as Black Panther/T'Challa, Angela Bassett as Ramonda, Danai Gurira as Okoye, and Letitia Wright as Shuri photographed exclusively for Entertainment Weekly by Kwaku Alston on March 18, 2017 in Atlanta, Georgia.  Kwaku Alston � 2017 MVLFFLLC. TM & � 2017 Marvel. All Rights Reserved.29. Here’s how Carter got involved with the film: “Ryan Coogler interviewed me and wanted my concept art in the very beginning of what I thought of the Black Panther and the Wakandan world. Of course, he couldn’t share the script with me, so I went out and read all the comic books and tried to gather up as much as I could. It’s really such a vast world. I was able to collaborate with some of my ideas about it being a place that is well ahead, futuristic in some ways, but not futuristic place in Africa that’s African but also has a wide stretch of cultural awareness that reaches to the depths of many cultures as well as a beauty. It’s unique amongst itself.”

    30. On designing T’Challa’s royal attire: “There’s another element to the story that I can’t tell you about, a spoiler alert, that we wanted to juxtapose two things. Our prince was very kingly. He was very clean, very tailored, what would you expect out of the son of a king. We also looked at a lot of embroidery and dashikis and things that people could relate to. We kind of embellished his kingly clothes with those things so that he’s a king that you know.”

    31. How they told Nakia’s story through costumes: “With Nakia, she starts out as a war dog coming from Nigeria. She’s fighting for young Nigerian women — who are captured by the mean guys, who are militants that capture women and put them in slavery. She starts out very tough. We see her immediately as a fighter. We know her as a fighter. She’s dusty and dirty. She wants to stay in that element. She’s comfortable there. I researched all kinds of fashionable war dogs, all kinds of fashionable, dirty fighters. There’s a lot of good looks out there, so it was hard to pick one. I think what we found for her was really great because it was very much not a part of Wakanda. It was a part of the world around. She travels into Wakanda.”

    “Then, she starts to gradually go back to her Wakandan roots, if you would. Her color palate also changes. It starts out as a war dog in army greens and browns and earth tone dirty and army boots. Then, as we greet her in other costumes and other scenes, the greens become very clear. It’s more jade, It’s more teal. It’s more put together. She still wears one earring. She still has her tough exterior, but we start seeing a little bit more layers to her origin of being a Wakandan girl, the head, the highest warrior of the river tribe.”

    32. How the classic Black Panther costume influenced the movie suit: “”I like the original Black Panther costume. I liked his helmet and I liked his boots. I liked a lot of things about it. What we wanted to do is take it into a new millennium, a new attitude, a new technology and make it exciting again.”

    And we glimpsed a bit of the costumes upgrade on set; it seems that Black Panther can summon his suit using nano-like technology (similar to how Iron Man summoned his suit in Marvel’s “Extremis” comic). As upgrades go, few are any cooler.

    Basically, just get excited for this movie.

  • ‘Avengers: Infinity War’: Yes, Doctor Strange, Iron Man, The Hulk, & Wong Are Now Bros

    Take this, shawarma scene!

    Marvel’s “Avengers: Infinity War” is now filming down in the Atlanta area, starring everyone under the sun, so you had to know some … likely or unlikely? … MCU connections were going to be made on set. Scarlett Johansson (Black Widow) recently confirmed there are about 62 Marvel characters in the whole thing, including around 32 just for one particular scene. It’s massive. And it’s Hotlanta, so you know the guys are going to be heading out for drinks to relax and cool down.

    Robert Downey Jr., aka Tony Stark/Iron Man, just shared a bonding photo with his good pal Bruce Banner/The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), along with the two Benedict newbies from “Doctor Strange,” Dr. Stephen Strange himself (Benedict Cumberbatch, in full goatie) and Wong (Benedict Wong).

    Commenting fans are really digging all of the facial hair.

    Cumberbatch’s Dr. Strange will next be seen in “Thor: Ragnarok” — which co-stars Ruffalo’s Hulk — jumping off from one of the end-credit scenes of “Doctor Strange.” That comes out this November. Downey’s Tony Stark will co-star in “Spider-Man: Homecoming,” which opens in just a few weeks on July 7. And then they’ll all be together for “Infinity War,” which opens May 4, 2018. It remains to be seen who’ll be around for “Avengers 4,” which follows this in May 2019.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • 9 Reasons Why ‘The Avengers’ Is the Best Superhero Movie Ever

    Since 2008 and the release of “Iron Man,” which featured a post-credits tag involving Samuel L. Jackson as a shadowy government figure who spoke of a larger, more unknowable world, the Marvel Cinematic Universe had been picking up steam. Each movie linked up with the previous film (or the next one), through subtle undercurrents and more overt connections. And it all came together with “The Avengers,” which was released five years ago (time flies when Thor does, too). Joss Whedon‘s film saw superheroes Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.), Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), Captain America (Chris Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), and The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) come together to fight Thor’s power-hungry brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston) and a band of rampaging extraterrestrials. It kicked ass. And it still kicks ass, all these years later.

    In fact, I’d argue that it’s still the best superhero movie ever.

    Below are the nine ways that “The Avengers” set itself apart from every superhero movie before it (and since), and why it remains, all these years later, the cream of the proverbial crop.

    1. Nobody Had Ever Seen Anything Like It

    We take superhero team-up movies for granted nowadays. Last year’s “Captain America: Civil War,” a supposedly stand-alone “Captain America” movie, had more superheroes than the second “Avengers” movie, for crying out loud. But at the time, this was fairly unprecedented territory. Nobody had seen something, with multiple heroes, all played by huge stars, sharing the screen time, in a movie that was the summation of several other films, stretched across several years. It could have been a huge disaster. Instead, it was transcendent. I still remember seeing the movie about a month before it was released, at a screening that was coordinated by a radio station, in New York City. It was 10 a.m. on a Saturday, and I remember the tears welling up in my eyes because there really were things in the movie that, as a lifelong comics fan, I never thought I’d see in a movie. But it was all there and it was totally brilliant.

    2. It Followed Through on All That Promise

    There were unreasonable expectations associated with this movie, considering that, for the previous half-decade, breadcrumbs had been left throughout every other Marvel Studios movie about where things were headed. We knew that the superheroes would, eventually, meet up, and they would have to face something that was so catastrophic that it required all of their considerable might. Beyond those details we didn’t know much what to expect (which, again, is helpful because it was such a wonderful surprise). But one thing was sure: it had to be good. Otherwise, all of the goodwill and promise that had been built by those previous films would have been squandered and the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which had already been mapped out for years (if not decades) in advance, would have potentially crumbled. But “The Avengers” did the impossible: It made good on all that promise and remains a cornerstone of the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe a half-decade later.

    3. The Heroes Were Flawed (But Not Overwhelmingly So)

    Looking back on this first film, it’s interesting to see how much the heroes fight each other. (This was years before “Captain America: Civil War” would turn this concept into an entire epic movie.) And it’s true that each of these heroes carried around a certain amount of baggage, emotional and otherwise, that needed to be addressed, dealt with, and then compartmentalized (at least long enough to fight that alien horde). But where “The Avengers” really succeeded and where some superhero movies in recent years have gotten stuck, is that it didn’t dwell on the psychic trauma of our heroes. It admitted that they were flawed, and took the necessary time to address those flaws, but it never felt bogged down by it. There is a certain amount of psychological imbalance to prompt someone to don a cape and jumpsuit and face-off against a demigod and Whedon was wise to acknowledge that. The characters were complicated but (crucially) never a drag.

    4. It’s So Joss Whedon

    Hundreds of people were responsible for “The Avengers,” from the talented folks fixing Scarlett’s wig to the countless digital artists who brought the Hulk to brilliant life. The fact that there’s any kind of authorial stamp on this movie seems like a miracle. But this movie is, through and through, the work of writer-director Joss Whedon (who returned, under significantly more strained circumstances, for the busy sequel “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and “Firefly”) could see it from moment one. It’s a hoot to hear his characteristic ratatat dialogue come out of the mouths of a tech billionaire, living demigod, and twitchy scientist, all at the same time, and his nimble handling of multiple characters and storylines, swiftly culminating in a grand climax, should be applauded, studied, and adhered to (this is how you do it, kids). Without Whedon’s deft handling of the material, we would have probably not had the two “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies (both written and directed by James Gunn). It proved that a filmmaker could really put their stamp on one of these movies, even within the giant machine.

    5. Everyone Had Their Moment

    There are a ton of characters in this movie, and yet they each have a satisfying arc, and are allowed signature moments, both in quieter, talky scenes and the big action set pieces (more on those in a minute). It’s pretty shocking, considering how many themes, ideas, and storylines there are that any of the characters has a moment to themselves. But it’s true. Each hero gets his or her time to shine. Even Hawkeye, who fairly early on in the movie is relegated to a pseudo-bad guy, comes back in the last act to really cement himself as a member of the team (and a key asset to the larger Marvel Cinematic Universe).

    6. It Set the Stage for What Was to Come

    And speaking of the larger Marvel Cinematic Universe, a few seconds in the middle of “The Avengers”‘ credits would set the stage for the next “phase” of the movies. It was then that we were introduced to Thanos, the mad titan and the big bad who has been looming over every movie since “The Avengers.” (If he hasn’t made an appearance outright then the Infinity Stones, the mystical doodads that would grant him domain over the entire universe, certainly have.) It was a gutsy move, and what could have just been a throwaway gag has been instrumental in shaping the contours of the Marvel Cinematic Universe for the next half-decade. It also gave rise to superhero movies that were, after the runaway success of something as different as “The Avengers,” willing to take chances and get weird. Without “The Avengers,” it’s doubtful we would have had movies as unique as “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Doctor Strange,” or “Ant-Man.” Very importantly, it set precedence that all are welcome in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

    7. It Reminded People That These Movies Are Based on Comic Books

    In recent years, a lot of superhero movies have been very serious. “The Dark Knight,” another brilliant superhero exploration and the movie that most would point to as the best comic book movie ever, also functions as a critique of Bush-era politics and the dangerous of a runaway surveillance state. Um … fun? “The Avengers” was deeply funny and colorful and reminded people that, while we might be living in the age of the graphic novel, that these characters came from comic books. It’s right there in the name. Whedon knows better than anybody that you can have real stakes and still get some good zingers in there.

    "Marvel's The Avengers" ..Thor (Chris Hemsworth) and Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson)..Ph: Film Frame..� 2011 MVLFFLLC. TM & � 2011 Marvel.  All Rights Reserved.8. There Was Real Emotion

    That’s the other thing about “The Avengers” that is often overlooked; this movie has a lot of heart. It’s a warm superhero movie. And when Agent Coulson (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” television series.) These were characters who fought and screamed and punched each other but they also felt, quite deeply, and formed their own dysfunctional family unit during the course of the movie. (“Family” is a big theme for Whedon and pops up again and again in his work.) Many superhero movies nowadays are defined by how chilly they are, both production-design-wise and emotionally. But “The Avengers” proved that its heart could be as big as its rippling biceps.

    9. Those Set Pieces Though

    It’s easy to applaud the headier, more artistic dimensions that make “The Avengers” so special, the more visceral elements of the movie need to be championed as well. Which brings us to … the set pieces. There aren’t that many set pieces in “The Avengers,” just a handful, but they do the job spectacularly well. And the climactic assault on New York City is arguably the greatest superhero action sequence in the history of the medium. There’s so much to love about that sequence, from the tiny character details to the swirling camera to the fact that, while the action is scattered across large swaths of midtown Manhattan (and that it was shot in both New York City and Cleveland), the spatial relationships of the characters and the geography of the attack is very clearly defined and reinforced, time after time. There are moments of shaky-cam intensity but most of it is smooth and clear. That’s saying something. And let’s not forget about things like the classic 360 shot that loops around the characters (still the coolest shot, like, ever) and the moment where Bruce Banner reveals that he’s always angry. These are the moments that made me (and countless viewers) squeal with childish glee. And they’re the moments that contribute to “The Avengers” being the greatest superhero movie ever.