Tag: discovery

  • ‘House of Hammer’ Interview: Casey Hammer Talks New Docuseries

    60HDqlrE

    Premiering on Discovery+ beginning September 2nd is the new three-part documentary series ‘House of Hammer,’ which was directed by Elli Hakami and Julian P. Hobbs.

    The series revolves around the life of disgraced American actor Armie Hammer and the alleged crimes of his famous wealthy family. In 2021 the actor was accused of sexual abuse and cannibalistic fetishism by several of his ex-girlfriends, which has derailed his successful career, marriage, and overall life.

    Hammer’s Aunt, Casey Hammer, serves as a consultant on the project and is also interviewed in the series.

    Moviefone recently had the pleasure of speaking with Casey Hammer about ‘House of Hammer,’ how she got involved in the project, the shocking truth about her powerful family, and her nephew’s public downfall.

    Armie Hammer in 2015's 'The Man from U.N.C.L.E.'
    Armie Hammer in 2015’s ‘The Man from U.N.C.L.E.’

    You can read the full interview below or click on the video player above to watch our interview with Casey Hammer about ‘House of Hammer.’

    Moviefone: To begin with, how were you approached to be part of this documentary series?

    Casey Hammer: So, how this all kind of happened was about eight years ago I wrote an autobiography called “Surviving My Birthright,” and I self-published it. It was more of a healing journal for me and to make sense of how I grew up in the process, and that it wasn’t okay. When I received the first copy, I was holding it, and it’s like I manifested it, my story is real. “I’m validated, right?” Every now and then someone might find it, because again it was self-published on Amazon.

    Then fast forward last year, I’m working as a kitchen designer at Home Depot in San Diego and one of my coworkers are like, “Casey you better get on TikTok, someone by the name of “The Zen Blonde” is blowing up your life.” I was like, “What?” I’m social media challenged anyway. So, we get online and I watch Lauren Skae read my book and in two hours I went from 500 followers to 5,000. I saw the power of social media and I was like, “What is happening?”

    All of a sudden everything was out of control. I didn’t choose to put any of that out there or want to come forward, and it was like being on a death drop of a rollercoaster. In that moment, I really believe the universe said to me, “Casey, you have an opportunity.” As Armie was imploding, I was getting calls from the media once they found out he had an aunt, and they wanted a sound bite.

    I didn’t want to participate in his implosion. It was like, how can I turn this into something positive? So, it was to be an advocate for victims and survivors, and that’s kind of how that happened. Then the producers reached out to me and said, “We read your book, and we want to tell your story.” I thought, this is how it continues.

    It’s through my eyes. In a sense of you may tune in to watch it because of Armie or the entertainment value, but by the time you finish watching three hours of my family, you are going to be incensed and furious. You’re going to see multi-generational abuse and how none of them have ever been held accountable. It’s a pattern. You don’t just wake up one day and become a monster, it’s a learned behavior.

    But again, I had no idea that the victims were going to come forward and speak, or that other people would corroborate my story. I take my hat off to them because they’re doing real time. I lived with this for 62 years, but the victims are probably being attacked on social media. I know how harsh that can be. So again, for them to bravely speak, it just means the world to me and hopefully helps other people come forward.

    MF: Since the subject of the series is your own family, was there ever any hesitancy on your part to be involved with this project?

    CH: Absolutely. I think that when you’re on the right path, again, I have self-medicated my whole life, and it’s only been the last year and a half that I have not. So, I’m sitting with emotions and triggers, and trying to figure out my life. I think when you’re on your path, it happens very quickly.

    It doesn’t give you time to process and be like, is this a good idea or not? It’s kind of like, okay, check in with your gut. This feels good, I’m helping people, and you keep going. You don’t have time to necessarily stop and say, “Wow, was that the right choice?” I try not to live with regrets. So, I try and choose in the moment. And again, with me, you make a choice, and if you don’t like the way it feels or what it’s doing, you can choose something else.

    So, it’s all new. Like I said, I didn’t go looking for it. I just know that my family is very powerful, and still has a lot of money and fame behind them. The way I grew up, when you walked out the front door, you were camera ready. You lived a perfect life. You were controlled by my grandfather who controlled the narrative, and you didn’t mess up or you were punished and threatened of being disowned or abused.

    There’re all kinds of things that I detail a lot more in my book that we didn’t have time to go into because we only had three hours. But it’s pretty horrific to know that the men get away with this and continue to get away with it.

    MF: Can you talk about the behavior you noticed growing up from the men in your family? Was their disrespectful treatment of women something that was taught to each new generation of male heirs, or rather just witnessed behavior that they eventually learned?

    CH: I mean, again, my mom left my father, and my father was an only child. When my mom left my father, my grandfather destroyed her in court. So, at a very early age, I saw what he was capable of doing. So, you lived in fear. I know that I was put in a lot of situations that as a child I shouldn’t be. I mean in ‘House of Hammer’ you see I’m 11 years old holding a phone book while my father shot at it (with a gun) in front of people. It’s like I was a party trick.

    But again, I kept going back thinking that my father loved me, that my mom loved me, and that all of this is normal and what normal families do. Without social media, you can’t Google, “What do wealthy families act like?” You just kind of existed. It wasn’t like I could go to the neighbors and ask if that was normal, because if my grandfather caught wind that I was asking, misbehaving or talking, I was in big trouble.

    So again, you’re groomed in a way because that’s your reality, that’s your normal. I mean people watch the docuseries and they’re like, “Oh my God. That’s so horrifying.” But to me it was like, that’s how I grew up.

    Growing up and being an adult woman, you don’t think anything’s wrong until people start pointing things out and you kind of go, “Well maybe I guess that is true.” But that’s because other people are talking. So, it makes me see part of my story in someone else, and hopefully that’s what I’m doing, if that makes sense.

    MF: According to the series, because your family was so powerful and wealthy, you felt that you were unable to report the crimes you witnessed growing up because they would just be able to pay off the authorities and cover it up. Can you talk about how you dealt with that at such a young age?

    CH: Again, as you saw in the docuseries, my father murdered someone, and my grandfather bought him off as self-defense. My mother told me, “I was standing right there.” My father just pulled out a gun and shot the guy, it was like no self-defense! So, I saw murders covered up and I think the power is in the fact. It’s not necessarily that they committed the crime, but they got away with it and covered it up very publicly.

    So, my grandfather believed that everyone had a price, and he blackmailed everybody. It’s not that you have this helpless feeling, but again, women were disposable in my family. So, I was told be pretty, don’t say anything that’ll embarrass us, and you’ll be taken care of the rest of your life. I was never taken seriously. No matter how smart or successful I was, it didn’t matter. But you try to get their attention because you want to be validated.

    Even as an adult now, I find myself again with the docuseries, and yes, I participated in it, but when I finally sat down to watch it, I got triggered. It’s horrific because that’s my life. Again, they only had three hours, there’s a lot more that can be told.

    MF: As you just mentioned, you were told growing up, “Don’t say anything that’ll embarrass us, and you’ll be taken care of the rest of your life.” But you endured so much mental and physical abuse from your own family, how is that “taking care of you?”

    CH: Again, it’s growing up with threats, and you see in the last episode what I’m up against. I refuse to live in fear because then I’m giving my power away, and that’s something that I won’t do ever again. It stops now, and I want to feel empowered that I take back my own life and my healing.

    And if something happens, we’ve got a docuseries out there now. They shined a light on it. I used to make jokes that if something ever happens to me, look at my family first. But now it’s crazy because it’s a reality.

    Casey Hammer appears in Discovery+'s documentary series 'House of Hammer.'
    Casey Hammer appears in Discovery+’s documentary series ‘House of Hammer.’

    MF: We live in such a fractured world now, and with social media, anybody can threaten or bully anyone else very easily. Did you have any concerns making this series that you would be harassed, not just by your family members for telling the truth, but by online trolls as well?

    CH: Again, my conversations are basically based on my experiences growing up. I knew Armie as a child up until about 15 years ago when my mom passed away. We were all still held together by her, the “fake family.” We pretended to all love each other and hangout kind of like ‘Succession,’ but a million times worse. We all spent a week together with her as she was dying, and then afterwards everyone went their separate ways. It was just, so this is the way it’s going to be, and you kind of make peace with that.

    So, I don’t care to have conversations with any of them. It’s one of those things where I’m just going to continue to live my life and to speak my truth, and hopefully, by bringing awareness, people will still talk about it, and they’ll shine a light on consent, accountability, and advocacy for victims and survivors. I hope to continue talking about it or write another book to just keep saying, “There’s a problem.”

    Because again with the MeToo movement, it shined a light on businesses, so people can’t necessarily get away with things in the work environment anymore. But there has to be a MeToo for the home also. Just because your parents give birth to you and you think they love you, it doesn’t mean that it’s true, right?

    MF: The series is not a tabloid show about a disgraced movie star, but rather seems to use Armie’s story as a vehicle to empower women to be strong in the face of abuse. Can you talk about that?

    CH: I didn’t look for this. I mean Armie got careless and he started this downfall and implosion all on his own. But because that happened, it shined a light on my family. I mean there was a documentary about their fraudulent art last year on Netflix. I mean there’s been stories, but people are choosing not to listen to them because again, the men in my family, they enter a room and they’re like politicians. Everyone loves them, they’re charming.

    So, when they look at someone like me and say, “Well you fell out of graces with the family, you must have done something wrong.” They don’t know the real story. So, a lot of my friends are like, “I had no idea that you went through all that.” I was like, “I’ve been saying that, but no one listened.” So again, it’s one of those moments where I didn’t choose this and for whatever reason, the universe had chosen it for me and wanted to see what I would do with it.

    MF: How much input did you have with the producers to decide what was actually going to be included in the three-hour series?

    CH: None. I basically was just like the other people that contributed in a sense, where I just talked on camera about my experiences. I gave them access to the photos and videos that were in my storage unit, just so that they could get a history. There were a couple authors that had worked with my grandfather and wrote books about my grandfather that came forward and were happy to share their situations.

    Then again, with my father, there was a lot of information that I could pass on to the producers. I really believe that out of all the people that I was approached by, they would take care of my story because they wanted to go through my book and talk about my version, my story, and my feelings. They really did take care of it. I’m so proud of ‘House of Hammer.’ I watch it as a person, and I’m like, wow. But when I watch it as a family member, I get triggered because it is hard. It’s one of those strange things.

    It’s like Space Mountain at Disneyland, where you go one way seven or eight turns and then all of a sudden, the last one is a different way and you’re like, “Oh my God.” You’re laughing hysterically and crying because it was so much fun. I’m just saying that’s how I feel right now. Kind of out of control, in the dark, fun, and wild. If any of that makes sense?

    MF: Through the course of making this series, did the directors discover anything about your family that came as a surprise to even you?

    CH: Yeah, or that I had forgotten about. Because again, it was my twenties and thirties where I was pretty much medicated a lot. Then the fact that the authors came forward, and some of the family friends that were in it as well. Again, it wasn’t like we all talked about it back then or continue to talk about it, but when it’s on camera in your face, you’re like, “I didn’t know that.”

    I knew my grandfather was powerful. I knew that when I asked him why he didn’t want to be president and he said, “There wasn’t enough power in it.” But hearing President Kennedy’s voice on the series, I mean there were things that just take you back a bit. Because again, my grandfather always controlled the narrative. So, we knew the fairytale version of what he wanted to portray out in the public.

    MF: Finally, speculating about your nephew’s acting career moving forward, do you think he has a road to redemption in Hollywood, or in your opinion, is he done being a movie star?

    CH: My experience growing up was that my father was in and out of mental institutions, and he was in and out of rehab per my grandfather. So, my father never got well. Until the person holds himself accountable and makes amends with the survivors, the victims, and the people they’ve wronged and choose to get well or healed, it’s not going to happen. It’s not going to work.

    So, for me, I have the image that just reminds me that here we are with another Hammer man in the press messing up, and the only difference is my grandfather’s not here to cover it up or buy his way out. But again, the Hammers feel that they’re basically not accountable for anything, like they’re above it all. That’s what money, power and fame does to people. As you see, it’s multi-generational, so it’s a learned behavior and an expectancy.

    Armie Hammer in 2018's 'Sorry to Bother You.'
    Armie Hammer in 2018’s ‘Sorry to Bother You.’
  • ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Casts Ethan Peck as Spock

    ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Casts Ethan Peck as Spock

    CBS

    “Star Trek: Discovery” is set to add an iconic character from the franchise to the fold in its second season, and now, the series has revealed who will be playing him.

    Actor Ethan Peck (who starred in the short-lived TV adaptation of “10 Things I Hate About You“) will join “Discovery” as Spock, the half-Vulcan, half-human officer previously played by Leonard Nimoy and Zachary Quinto. Those are some pretty big shoes to fill, though Peck has an impressive pedigree himself: He’s the grandson of Hollywood legend Gregory Peck.

    According to “Discovery” showrunner Alex Kurtzman, the search for the new Spock was painstaking, but the creative team is confident that Peck is the best fit for the famous role. In a statement, Kurtzman said:

    “Through 52 years of television and film, a parallel universe and a mirror universe, Mr. Spock remains the only member of the original bridge crew to span every era of Star Trek. The great Leonard Nimoy, then the brilliant Zachary Quinto, brought incomparable humanity to a character forever torn between logic and emotion. We searched for months for an actor who would, like them, bring his own interpretation to the role. An actor who would, like them, effortlessly embody Spock’s greatest qualities, beyond obvious logic: empathy, intuition, compassion, confusion and yearning. Ethan Peck walked into the room inhabiting all of these qualities, aware of his daunting responsibility to Leonard, Zack and the fans, and ready to confront the challenge in the service of protecting and expanding on Spock’s legacy. In that spirit, we’re thrilled to welcome him to the family.”

    This time around, Spock will once again assume the role of chief science officer, now serving under Capt. Christopher Pike (fellow new series regular Anson Mount) on the USS Discovery. He’s also the foster brother of Michael Burnham (Sonequa Martin-Green).

    “Star Trek: Discovery” will return to CBS All Access sometime next year.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

  • CBS Is Making More ‘Star Trek’ Series With ‘Discovery’ Showrunner Alex Kurtzman

    Looks like the “Star Trek” franchise won’t be reaching its final frontier anytime soon: Following the success of CBS All Access freshman series “Star Trek: Discovery,” CBS has announced plans to develop additional “Trek” content.

    According to The Hollywood Reporter, Alex Kurtzman — who previously served as an executive producer on “Discovery,” before taking over showrunning duties from fired duo Gretchen Berg and Aaron Harberts — has extended his contract with CBS Television Studios through 2023, netting an estimated $5 million in annual earnings. And that big payday includes a big mandate from the network: Make more “Star Trek.”

    “Kurtzman will … expand the ‘Star Trek’ franchise for the small screen, developing new series, miniseries and other content, including animation,” THR reports.

    One of those additional series is a rumored reboot starring Sir Patrick Stewart, reprising his “Star Trek: The Next Generation” role of Capt. Jean-Luc Picard. According to THR’s sources, Kurtzman and “Discovery” alum Akiva Goldsman are said to be spearheading that new show, though they caution that “a deal is far from completed and may not happen despite the fact that the actor recently teased his potential return to the franchise.”

    Whatever happens with Stewart (we’re keeping our fingers crossed for that one), it sounds like Kurtzman and his production company, Secret Hideout, are determined to continue boldly going forward.

    “CBS has also allowed us the great pleasure of reintroducing the world ofStar Trek’ [to] audiences new and old, and we are very excited to keep working alongside them to expand that world,” the producer said in a statement.

    Season two of “Discovery” is in production now. Stay tuned for more intel about additional “Trek” series as it becomes available.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

  • Jane Lynch Transforms Into Janet Reno for ‘Manhunt: Unabomber’

    2017 Summer TCA - PortraitsJane Lynch is getting serious.

    Lynch, of course, is best known for her hilarious, Emmy-winning stint as the aggressively confrontational, creatively insulting Sue Sylvester on the hit series “Glee,” a role that also provided her with many memorable dramatic moments exploring Sue’s less ruthless side.

    In fact, throughout her prolific, often comedy-driven career Lynch has periodically ventured into more straightforward roles (including a critically hailed pre-“Glee” turn in “Manhunt: Unabomber.”

    Lynch plays former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, appointed during the Clinton administration as the first woman to serve as the country’s chief law enforcement official and the longest-serving of the contemporary era. As such, Reno, who died last fall at age 78, stood at the head of the FBI’s bid to apprehend and convict the notorious and deadly Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, following his long mail-bombing reign of terror.

    Moviefone sat down with Lynch, who shared her thoughts on the real-life Reno, her current openness to all kinds of projects, and a hoped-for reunion — perhaps in dark, dramatic territory — with one of the key creative forces in her career.

    Moviefone: “Glee” cemented your reputation as a comedian in people’s minds, but you were in a lot of movies before “Glee,” and not always comedy. So what was it like to take the turn back to more dramatic roles?

    Jane Lynch: Well, I was thrilled. I’ve always been a great admirer of Janet Reno and I’ve always been quite charmed by her. It was the beginnings of my becoming a political animal back in the ’90s. And I didn’t know the details of this case or any of the other huge cases she had on her desk during her tenure, which is 11 years long, but I always got the sense that she was a straight shooter.

    And also, what I found out — I guessed it back then — was that she had a terrific sense of humor in everything. We don’t get to see it in the show, but there is a great humanity to her, and she had some really big life-or-death decisions to make during her tenure. She will admit, and did, that she made some mistakes, especially, with regard to the loss of life at Waco. But, she was taking a really big gamble publishing this manifesto, agreeing to do that, because it’s akin to negotiating with terrorists. And it ended up working out for her, but it could have gone the other way.

    We see that she comes into this story with those regrets, from those mistakes she believes she made. How did you come at trying to bring those to life in your performance?

    I can imagine having that kind of responsibility, I don’t think I would ever want it. But that’s part of the job. And that’s why having her in that job for those 11 years — she weighed those decisions very heavily.

    There was no political consideration, from what I could tell, at all. She was completely independent of the president who appointed her, Bill Clinton. Evidenced in that she appointed a special council for the Whitewater case, which led to become the blue dress case. And she just followed they facts where they her, she was more interested in truth and justice than anything else.

    That’s what I was impressed with, most of all. At least for me, and I think a lot of actors will say this: the first thing that I do with a character, and this is just subconsciously, is go right to the emotional motivation for what they do and what they’re trying to hide. And with her, that wasn’t the hook for me, what she’s trying to hide. Everything was really out there.

    But she wanted to be fair and she wanted to do the right thing to the best of her ability, and she had a very quiet authority and power that, I felt, was palpable. And I saw it mostly in her press conferences where she, basically, was just reading the words and there was no emotion, had a flat affect, but you could feel the authority and the power and the consideration that was put into every word.jane lynch as janet renoTell me about the external considerations, when you’re playing a real person. What was your approach with her to create that image of her, physically?

    Well, as I do any other role, in this case I had a really terrific human being as my jump-off point. Just physically, she was somebody that was interesting to play, she was about 6’3″, I think. One of those people who, she doesn’t walk as much as lumbers. And did not have that eye or that mind of looking back on herself going, “Hey, I look good.” Or “I don’t look good.” She just didn’t have that. She wore the clothes she was supposed to wear and everything was, kind of, a version of the same outfit.

    They were like, kind of, a scoop neck thing with the pearls, and she just switched up the colors. And sometimes she wore really bright colors, too. And there was such an incongruity to her very kind of low-keyed presence and her steadiness and her patience and how well considered all of her actions and all of her words were, and she show up wearing a bright royal blue or purple outfit. And flats, so she could make it down the hall without falling.

    The hairdo was really just not a hairdo. She basically just combed her hair and wore glasses. And so, the fear for me is that I would end up looking like SNL” and just show up as a wig and a pair of glasses. But I had a great team of professionals making sure, so I didn’t worry so much about that, as I did about getting the insides right and the movement right, the walk and the whole thing.

    When was the last time you played a person that the public would recognize?

    I don’t know that I have — I don’t think I have! I think this will be the first time.

    That must have been fun acting challenge for you.

    It was. The minute I was told this could be in the works I was very excited. Very excited to do it — there’s so much there! And the writing ended up being so good. So fantastic.

    When you started on your career path in acting, were you thinking, I’m a dramatic actress?

    Sort of. I was, and, I thought I was deciding how my career would go — and then my career just, kind of had a life of its own. And I ended up in comedy and sketch, and I loved it. But I did think that I would be, like, a theater actor. I thought that’s what I was gonna do. Life had different plans for me.

    When did you first recognize your facility for comedy? And especially that you have a great facility for very straight-faced comedy.

    Well, that came. That kind of found itself. But as kid I was always the funny one and loved making people laugh. But in my young mind I didn’t, necessarily, think that that was going to be … I knew I wanted to be an actress, too, but I didn’t the two of those would meet. I never consciously said, “And I’ll be the funny one …” I just knew I wanted to be on stage and I wanted to sing and I wanted to be part of a group. I never wanted to be by myself.

    You’ve got a good group here. I imagine that just showing up to play with these actors …

    Yeah. Paul Bettany and Sam Worthington, just pretty amazing actors. Chris Noth, I got to work with him, that was pretty amazing.

    What was the big reveal, as you dug into the script? And I don’t know if you dug into a lot of extra research on the Unabomber, himself, but what was the big reveal of the story, for you? Because we all think we know some broad-strokes Unabomber lore.

    I didn’t know he was such a genius. I was vaguely and generally aware of the story. I did not know he was a math prodigy. I did not know that his head was messed with at Harvard, where they did some experiments on him. I didn’t know about Fitzgerald, Sam’s character — I didn’t know about him being the unsung hero of this case, really, and creating this new metric for profiling that’s now the jumping off point for the CSIs and the NCISs and all that. We didn’t have that kind of a sophisticated profiling system back then. This was a real turning point for that, a real evolution of criminal profiling.

    It feels like you can’t watch anything on film or television these days without thinking about politics and our current situation. One of the things I saw here was how professional these teams are, on every level.

    Yeah, and thank God for them!

    And how important that is. And it makes me almost more concerned about now for the current versions of these professionals, and the treatment that they might be getting from a political standpoint.

    Right. Well, here’s the thing — and I’m kind of deep in Twitter these days. The intelligence community is a bunch of very non-political professionals. They may have political bents, but they are as professional as Janet Reno was and Ackerman and Fitzgerald were. They are interested only in the facts and putting pieces together.

    And we can have buffoonery going on in other parts of the government and, so far, the institutions are holding fast. So far. And I’m much more filled with hope these days than I was at the beginning, when this reign of buffoonery started.

    You’ve been touring around the country with “See Jane Sing.” You’ve taken acting gigs here and there. You have “Hollywood Game Night.” What are you seeing in your future? What’s on your bucket list?

    I don’t have a bucket list. I found out, pretty early on, that what gets presented to me in life is always better than any bucket list I had. So I don’t have goals or ambitions or anything.

    But we’re gonna re-release the Christmas album again this year. And it’s called, “A Swingin’ Little Christmas,” and I just did a new single, that we’re gonna release with it — with Dick Van Dyke! We’re singing a song called “Let’s Go Caroling.” It was written by our band leader, Tony Guerrero, and he sings it and I do background with it.

    So we’re starting on that and we’re doing a tour late November, early December and all over the country – doing that show, basically singing the album with Boy Band”! He is the vocal arranger on “Boy Band,” on ABC. He’s getting a big following there and he’s gonna tour with us and our five-piece band, too.

    And I sing with symphonies now. I’ve done two symphony shows. It’s been pretty amazing and humbling and kind of a transcendental experience.

    One of the things I thought of while watching you in this was, given what Ryan Murphy‘s doing these days, that I feel like your collaboration could happen again.

    Oh, I’d love it! I hope so. Yeah.

    Wouldn’t that be fun? To take on a dramatic project with him?

    Absolutely. And something very dark would be fun, too. Because he thinks outside of the box, he’s a real renegade. And it’s always exciting to see what he comes up with next.

  • ‘Cash Cab’ Is Returning to Duty on Discovery

    Ready to catch a “Cash Cab” again?

    Discovery announced it is reviving the game show, which features random passengers entering a taxi and discovering that they have a chance to win cash prizes.

    The series, which ran from 2005-2012, won three Emmy Awards. Comedian David Steinberg will executive produce the new version. Previous host Ben Bailey will not be returning for the revival.

    The new twist is that celebrities from movies, TV, and comedy will be behind the wheel when passengers board the cab. As usual, contestants be given classic trivia questions en route to their destination, and if they get stumped, they can get help from friends on the phone or even ask pedestrians. Three wrong answers and the passenger is kicked out of the cab.

    The new “Cash Cab” is expected to debut later this year.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Mythbusters’ to End After Next Season

    MythbustersThe “Mythbusters” will bust their final myths next season.

    Entertainment Weekly reports that Discovery’s long-running reality series will come to an end after 14 seasons. The stars, Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman, have planned an “explosive” final run of episodes.

    “It was my greatest fear that Mythbusters would just stop and we wouldn’t be able to do proper final episodes,” Savage told EW. “So whether it’s myths about human behavior or car stories or explosion stories, we tried to find the most awesome example of each category and build on our past history.”

    “Mythbusters” was a hit for Discovery in its early days, and received much critical acclaim, as well as seven Emmy nominations. It is credited with helping to make science accessible and interesting for a broad swath of people.

    Savage and Hyneman, who famously do not get along, will tour the country for a last round of “Mythbusters Live” next month. That will likely be the last time they work together.

    The final season of “Mythbusters” will premiere January 9. And the Science Channel will run a massive marathon of all 248 episodes starting Dec. 3.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.