Tag: david-warner

  • Screen Legend David Warner Dies

    David Warner as John Leslie Stevenson/Jack the Ripper in 1979's 'Time After Time.'
    David Warner as John Leslie Stevenson/Jack the Ripper in 1979’s ‘Time After Time.’

    David Warner might have been known for creating memorable movie villains, but the talented, humble British actor proved in a long and varied career that he could do so much more. Warner died this weekend aged 80.

    Born in Manchester in 1941, his upbringing was turbulent, torn between different towns and schools as his father moved between jobs. His parents’ separation didn’t help either, and Warner came close to a life of crime.

    Yet thanks to a teacher who mentored him and sparked a passion for performance, he scored a place at London’s Royal Academy of Dramatic Art. Following that, he began a long, fruitful theatre career at the Royal Court in 1962, rising up the ranks in Shakespearian productions before he was recruited the Royal Shakespeare Company in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1963.

    Film and TV work also beckoned, and Warner made his movie debut in 1963’s ‘Tom Jones’, which starred Albert Finney. That launched a healthy career on the big screen, with credits in an incredible mix of movies including ‘Nightwing’, ‘Straw Dogs’, ‘The Ballad of Cable Hogue’, ‘Cross of Iron’, ‘The Man with Two Brains’, ‘Waxwork’, ‘In the Mouth of Madness’, ‘Scream 2’, and his final work on the big screen, ‘Mary Poppins Returns’, in which he plays Admiral Boom.

    A chameleon throughout his career, Warner was equally at home bringing nuance to uptight officials, cackling villains and, in 1976’s original ‘The Omen’, a photojournalist whose investigation leads to an iconic encounter with a deadly pane of glass. In 1979’s ‘Time after Time’, he was the threat, playing a friend of H.G. Wells (Malcolm McDowell) who turns out to be Jack the Ripper.

    David Warner as Spicer Lovejoy in 1997's 'Titanic.'
    David Warner as Spicer Lovejoy in 1997’s ‘Titanic.’

    For 1982’s ‘Tron’, he played several linked roles: villainous business executive Ed Dillinger, the voice of the Master Control Program and Sark, the leader of the MCP’s Army. ‘Time Bandits’ fans know him as the villain simply called Evil and chewing the scenery with fitting aplomb.

    Star Trek’ fans, on the other hand, know him for several different roles: that of drunken Federation official St. John Talbot in ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’, Klingon Chancellor Gorkon in ‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country’ and, most memorably on the small screen, as the strict Cardassian torturer Gul Madred in the two-part ‘Chain Of Command’ from ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’.

    He had two screen trips on the ill-fated RMS Titanic, first in 1970 TV movie ‘S.O.S. Titanic’ and then in the slightly better known 1997 James Cameron movie, in which he played Spicer Lovejoy, sneery right-hand-man and fixer for Billy Zane’s Caledon Hockley.

    Warner died Sunday from a cancer-related illness at Denville Hall, a care home for those who have worked in entertainment.

    “Over the past 18 months he approached his diagnosis with a characteristic grace and dignity,” his family said in a statement given to the BBC. He will be missed hugely by us, his friends, and remembered as a kind-hearted, generous and compassionate man, partner and father, whose legacy of extraordinary work has touched the lives of so many over the years. We are heartbroken.”

    David Warner as Gorkon in 1991's 'Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.'
    David Warner as Gorkon in 1991’s ‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.’
  • ‘Time After Time’ Stars Stroma and Bowman Embrace History On-Screen and Off

    Freddie Stroma and Josh Bowman in TIME AFTER TIME“Time After Time” stars Freddie Stroma and Josh Bowman have to deal with some serious history — as much off-screen as on.

    Not only do the two actors have to bring to life two of the most intriguing and legendary real-life figures from the Victorian era as they journey through time — the pioneering science fiction novelist and futurist H.G. Wells and the still-enigmatic serial killer Jack the Ripper, respectively — they also have to do so in the shadow of the two renowned actors, Malcolm McDowell and David Warner, who originated the roles in the 1979 cult classic film the TV series is based on.

    But the two British gents are more than game for the task, as they revealed in a candid chat with Moviefone — as well as disclosing the very specific time and place in American history where they’d both like to take a time-traveling vacation.

    Moviefone: I discovered the original “Time After Time” movie when I was maybe 11, so I’m very fond of it. How did it hit you guys, and what were your takeaways, seeing it now?

    Freddie Stroma: We read the script first. We watched it after. I read the first and then watched it. So for me, it was in ’79. So the first thing you notice, I think anyone would notice now, it was in a different time period of filmmaking. Certain aspects are a little slower. It was from the ’70s. It makes sense. And obviously the special effects [then] — that’s as it was.

    Josh Bowman: We’ve taken it and modernized it. Better or worse, I don’t know about any of that. We’ve modernized it and made our own version for television. Hopefully it’s a fun journey for the audience. We go on this crazy adventure. We’ve changed the setting Manhattan instead of San Francisco and it takes place over 12 episodes, so we really stretch it out.

    As you started building your versions of these characters, tell me where you started. What were the things that initially as you were analyzing it, knowing that there is an H. G. Wells to look at, knowing that there’s at least Ripper lore to look at, how did you start creating these characters?

    Stroma: It started with what we had on the page. I think they were both pretty specific on the page. The main thing that I saw from H. G. Wells that was definitely in Kevin [Williamson‘s] writing was his obsession with utopia. I think we really ran with that. I think that’s kind of his through thing, is his absolutely innocence.

    So he really believes in that utopia, and that plays every scene. He just constantly believes the best in people, and he still believes the best that he will own up, and he will come back, and he will do what is righteous, and that to me has been the biggest point of H. G. Wells.

    Bowman: Kevin definitely created these two characters, and I think they’re quite different from the movie. He’s very much the protagonist, and I’m the antagonist, and you see that. But you also see this relationship that’s important throughout, the relationship between these two characters.

    I’m playing a fictional character, effectively, so we read the novels of H. G. Wells. I read into some of these guys, types of people who did these heinous things, psychopaths. Kevin knows how to write for some of these things — he’s done it for a long time. There’s bits of “Scream” in this.

    Hell, there’s probably bits of “Dawson’s Creek.” There’s a great love story with these two. It’s really romantic and beautiful, and I’m in there to try and mess it all up. We had a lot of fun in New York. It was a great place to go and shoot. Like Freddie said, what was on the page. We try to influence whatever we could.

    By coincidence, I recently interviewed Nicholas Meyer, the writer and director of the original. One of the things that he said, in the way that Wells is struggling with this lack of utopia, the dystopian qualities of our society now, the Ripper had just come home, in a sense. Did you find that?

    Bowman: Yeah, definitely. He’s in awe when he comes across bar with women wearing revealing dresses, and cleavage is out, and they have all sorts of amazing makeup. Even the figures are different, and all sort of different shapes, and sizes, and colors. It’s honestly like a kaleidoscope of people for him. So yeah, he’s definitely taken away with that, drug use, alcohol. Everything is completely different. Yeah, he definitely goes into that world wide-eyed and taking it all in, drinking it all in.

    Because the love story is part and parcel of what “Time After Time” has been, Freddie, tell me about finding what you needed to find there — working with Genesis Rodriguez to get that spark and that rapport that you guys needed, and carry it forward past where we know the setup of the story’s going to be.

    Stroma: To me, it comes down to the fact that H. G. Wells is in such a place where he’s so upset about utopia not being in the future, and he keeps meeting people that don’t really help him. And then suddenly, he finds this woman who is kind to him, and it’s this weird glimpse I think into, “Wait, there can be a utopia,” and she’s this strong woman who shows strength and kindness, and feminism is something that he’s never really experienced before. I think that was key, really, to why he is so drawn to Jane, and then she’s intelligent as well. All those aspects which make her very attractive to him.

    Did you guys see any character bits in Malcolm McDowell’s or David Warner’s performances that you were like, “I’m going to remember that and keep it in my back pocket, and maybe use it to inform something here or there.”

    Bowman: I can’t compare myself to him! He’s unbelievable, so I did the best with what I could. I think they were great in the film. We try to do the best we could under all the circumstances, and also try and create something that’s different. It’s definitely younger, a lot younger than what they were.

    Stroma: I couldn’t steal anything. There’s nothing I saw that I was like, “Ooh, I’m going to save that.” But I would have done so if I’d suddenly seen something that would work for us!

    Bowman: The deep underbelly of it was very similar. He believed in this utopian society. I was a bit more of a realist and excited to see this new world, and ran amok. And like him, I shaved and changed my look. We went from quite a different look. We started in a very period look and went to a very, very modern look. But also the modern look now is different from the ’70s, right? It’s probably a bigger jump. It’s a timeless piece now, Malcolm McDowell and David Warner and Mary Steenburgen.

    Stroma: There was one moment: there’s a scene in the hotel where he comes up. I was definitely struggling with how much this man is in love with utopia, and he really believes the best in people. He would just walk up to Jack the Ripper and say, “All right, we’re going now.”

    I was worried about that level of wide-eyed, sort of positive belief, as opposed to just idiocy — it’s like, “You know he’s a killer. You must have that intelligence, social intelligence to understand that.” So it helped seeing it in the movie going, “OK, yeah, I can do that. That sort of makes sense. I have to play him as if he’s that sure.”

    Ever since the real H. G. Wells pretty much invented the time-travel story, it’s been a fascinating concept and it’s been great for books, and movies, and TV shows. Either in visiting an era that you never had access to, or the possibility of correcting a mistake in your own past, what is it that appeals to you guys most about the time-travel concept?

    Stroma: I think it’s a similar thing to magic movies and the rest of it. I think it’s power. People like the idea of going back with knowledge, and you can tell people things. And then the other aspect is someone will go to the future, which is just seeing what they would think of such things. Would they frown upon the things we do, or would they marvel at it? I guess we kind of do a bit of that.

    To me, I think it’s always the idea of knowledge. It’s exciting to know what the future has in store. Or it’s fun to have the power of knowledge to go back and know what’s going to happen. You’re almost a deity of sorts. You can tell the future. I think it’s the same as magic movies. People love, “What if? If you could cast any spell, what would you do?” Same with superheroes. If you had this power, what would you do? It’s that what if thing.

    For yourselves, for your own curiosity, is there an era that fascinates you? Is there a place that you would love to go and visit if time travel existed?

    Stroma: I think ’50s America —

    Bowman: Rat Pack!

    Stroma: Oh yeah!

    Bowman: Walk around with Sammy Davis, Jr., Dean Martin, and Frank Sinatra, go to Palm Springs when Marilyn Monroe was there, Brando was coming up —

    Stroma: America in the ’50s!

    Bowman: Imagine rolling the dice in Vegas with them. Imagine smoking cigars, drinking Scotch. I always say I’d be there in a heartbeat.

    Stroma: Yeah. I said that at Comic-Con for my answer and [director] Marcos [Siega] and Genesis just kept laughing at me. I was like, “Why is that weird?” It’s an incredible time!

    Bowman: It’s a guy’s thing. It’s a classy time. I suppose that’s when America was at its greatest. For sure. We’ve all lost our [swagger] now, everyone. Not just America: the whole f*cking world. But back then, movie stars were movie stars. There was class. There was integrity.

    Stroma: It was an economic boom. Things were happening. There was innovation It’s an incredible moment in history in America.

    Bowman: Music is great now, but music was amazing. And acting, that’s what it’s like to shift as well from “the stage” to people who were just like embodying characters, inhabiting characters, and you’re like, how do they do that? Brando, James Dean, Monty Clift. All those amazing actors. Yeah. “[A] Streetcar [Named Desire],” to me, that was the time acting in movies changed — it was Brando in “Streetcar,” coming in and going, “Wait, he’s being real.” And you look and you go, people do that now. People weren’t doing that back then. He was so present.

    Really, the key relationship in this show is the two of you. Tell me about finding your give and take as actors as you started playing the role and circling around each other.

    Bowman: Straight off the bat, it was fairly easy, for me anyway. I think the majority of the time it was get what we need from the scene and why we’re saying what we’re saying, but we already had a rapport to do that. We had fun. It’s not uber, uber drama, but it is in a world that’s dramatic. At the heart of it, there’s a lot of banter, a lot of give and take, push and pull, and we both provide that I think — I hope — for the audience.

    Stroma: Also, we’re not just playing friends. We’re playing two people who every scene we have with any other character, they’re from a different time period. So whenever we have a scene together, we are finally speaking to someone who’s from our time period. So we can actually connect in the way that we are used to. That’s why I love those scenes with us.

    “You’re a psychopath, but you get me.”

    Stroma: “You’re crazy, but you know who I am.”

  • How Kevin Williamson Turned a Cult-Classic Movie Into ABC’s ‘Time After Time’

    There’s something a little meta already built into ABC’s new time-travel series, “Time After Time”: not only does it reach back to a cult-classic 1979 film for its foundation, it also takes the concept forward into a brand-new future.

    The original “Time After Time” movie — directed and adapted for the screen from Karl Alexander’s novel by filmmaker Nicholas Meyer (the even more classic “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan“) — has endured as a perfect, precise example of inventive time-travel plotting and endearingly rendered historic characters come to life: in the film, pioneering 19th century sci-fi novelist and futurist H.G. Wells (Malcolm McDowell), author of “The Time Machine,” actually devises his own working time travel device, which is hijacked by his friend and colleague, who turns out to be the now-legendary Victorian serial killer Jack the Ripper (David Warner) and who finds a new, fertile hunting ground in 1979 San Francisco. The film emerged as a critical sensation and a modest commercial success, its reputation and stature only increasing in the decades to follow.

    The film provides the basis for the series — which debuts March 5th and stars The Vampire Diaries”), who uses the basic premise for the pilot episode but immediately begins building out brand-new extensions to its mythology, as well as many subtle and not-so-subtle nods to the entirety of Wells’s works.

    Teaming with executive producer and director Marcos Siega, a veteran of “The Vampire Diaries” and a host of iconic music videos, Williamson reveals his plans to build a rich and complex world from the juicy set-up — as well as why he loves the original so much.

    Moviefone: By coincidence, I recently interviewed Nicholas Meyer about “Time After Time” for the Blu-ray edition, so it was really interesting to get his take on why the movie has survived.

    Kevin Williamson: Because it’s awesome! It’s great, and he’s a genius. That’s why.

    One of the things he thought, too, was that it’s because time travel is the one type of travel that we haven’t mastered in real life. So it’s still so rich, and there are so many things that you can fantasize about with time travel.

    Williamson: There’s something dreamy about it. What our characters do in the course of the mythology of our show is there’s certain characters that want to fix something. They have something empty, or they have something missing inside, and they’d like to just go back and fix this, then it’ll make everything right, it’ll make me complete. I’m talking about that one particular character who’s ultimately our villain.

    Maros Siega: But it’s escapism as a genre. I think that’s smart. It is the one thing we can’t do.

    Williamson: I do it all the time, I don’t know about you. [Laughs]

    The source material is this perfectly constructed movie, playing with those little paradoxes and fun time travel elements.

    Williamson: We’re very faithful to it. I hope we do Nicholas Meyer proud. I think we really honor his work. We try to.

    What I enjoyed about your take was that you do all of those things in the pilot, and then we’ve got so much other things to do.

    Williamson: “Then it begins …”

    When did it click, how do we go from this ingenious little story to a bigger world? How did you guys land on your path?

    Williamson: For me, it was the very same way that I discovered the movie, is that I saw the movie, I went, Jack the Ripper, H. G. Wells, and then I read the book, then I started looking up H. G. Wells and read “The Time Machine” and “The Island of Doctor Moreau,” watching all the movies and realized, “Oh, there’s a whole world here.”

    So in the same way that the time travel launches the series in Episode 1, I wanted to take that same idea with a young H. G. Wells and tell all the stories, and tell all of his books. The same way that if you’ve read “The Time Machine,” Nicholas Meyer has made a wink and a nod to a lot of moments in the book. H. G. Wells is very dense, but he explored a lot of themes.

    I feel like Nicholas Meyer touched on a lot of them in his movie, [author] Karl Alexander also in the book. I thought we could do the same on a weekly basis with all the various other shows, all various other books. Long-winded answer to say that.

    Did you see the same potential in this vast amount of Ripper lore that we have today? Did you want to look at that and say, “Let’s take a little inspiration here and there”?

    Williamson: We do. Like Nicholas Meyer did, we take upon the idea that he’s a doctor and a surgeon. We also play with the idea of Jack the Ripper as he’s defined in the traditional sense. We don’t take any special mythology to it, but then we create a character arc for him, and a character journey for him that takes him to a very interesting place.

    The very concept of the source material gives you permission to bring in historical characters. Tell me about the allure of that, because you’ve got the two at the center, but do you want to say “And here’s where Abraham Lincoln comes into our story … ?” Or is it better to have characters like Genesis Rodriguez’s character, with whom you can go anywhere?

    Williamson: Aren’t other shows doing that, where they’re doing period events?

    Siega: Yeah, that’s what it seems, and how we’re not really a time travel show. Because when we time travel, it’s very specific to our characters, and their journey, and their story, and not so much event-driven.

    Williamson: We’re a love story. We’re a story of family, and people, relationships.

    And those relationships are so important to driving everything, and you’ve got to find actors where the love story is as important as the “hate story” with these three characters. Tell me about finding that delicate mix: first in the writing, and then in the casting.

    Williamson: The pilot is very faithful to the original movie and book, so I wanted to keep that intact. That was very important to me, because what I loved about the characters that Nicholas Meyer had created was this idea that if a man who believed in utopia, and came to modern day, and was profoundly disappointed. And meanwhile, his adversary thrives and falls right in step.

    I really responded to those characters in a big way, and I wanted to do it in a modern context. So we tried to hold true to that. And then casting, the directing took over.

    Siega: In the casting, you come right off page with the charismatic Jack the Ripper, and in meeting Josh, he walked in and embodied that, the same with Freddie. They’re very much like their characters in real life. Freddie is a very sweet, wide-eyed, light, and Josh is cynical, and little dark, a little edgier. So we got really lucky with the cast. Then Genesis as Jane, that was a harder one to cast, but she’s great. It really works. A lot of chemistry with the three of them.

    From her past work, I would never have consciously equated Genesis with Mary Steenburgen, they’re individuals, but there’s a quirkiness they share that I really saw in the pilot.

    Siega: That’s good. I don’t know that I saw that.

    Williamson: You didn’t see the movie.

    Siega: I didn’t watch the movie. Mostly because of execution. Kevin talks about it constantly — he really, every conversation …

    Williamson: I have it memorized!

    Siega: He actually still doesn’t believe that I didn’t watch the movie. I’m like, “I really, truly didn’t.” I was afraid of mimicking, copying, and I wanted it to have its own voice. He was so true to it and he loves it so much.

    Have you seen it yet?

    Siega: No, I haven’t. I’ve read the book.

    Williamson: You know the movie, so you know I took the bedroom scene, the bedroom scene is kind of the bar scene in our show.

    Siega: And that I know because it’s in the trailer. I did watch the trailer.

    Williamson: So it was very important to me that we capture that scene, and I wanted those lines from the original movie. I just wanted those statements made, and I wanted to make sure. I thought, that scene was so important. I was like, “Watch the movie!”

    In a way, Kevin, like “The Vampire Diaries,” I feel like this project plays to your two great strengths. The “Dawson’s Creek” side with the emotional beats, and the horror side you’re known for from “Scream.” Did you feel that way as you were working on it?

    Williamson: I did! You know what I did think, it’s a sort of return to “Vampire Diaries,” which for the first two years is very mythology-driven. And yes, that’s vampire mythology, but now we’re in more of a science-fiction mythology. And it’s five minutes in the future, but we are dealing with the good and bad of humanity as it relates to technology. That’s what I thought “The Time Machine” by H. G. Wells was openly about. It was a social class struggle, to some degree, with your Morlocks and Eloi. Weena’s showing up at some point. Do you know who she is?

    Siega: I do! I read the book!

    Williamson: But it’s not in the form of Weena. She shows up as a homicide detective.

    Siega: She was a little bit more Weena before we made the change.

    Williamson: Yes, she was. You’re absolutely right.

    I’ll close on giving you a choice, would you rather use time travel for your personal purposes, to go to an era that you always wanted to see, or to fix something that you think you might have done wrong? Like “I wish I could go back and do that over.”

    Williamson: Because I’ve lived so long in the rules of time travel, I think it’s very important to know nothing was a mistake if you learn from it.

    Siega: I agree. I feel like anything you’ve done, good or bad, had a reason.

    Williamson: It is the fabric of what made you who you are. You have to own it.

    Siega: We’ve been living in that reality in the show. It starts to make sense.

    Williamson: That’s part of the show, which is you just can’t …

    Siega: So I would go back just to see.

    If you’re time travel tourists, where would you go?

    Williamson: Time traveling tourist? Where do you go just for fun?

    Siega: Dinosaurs! I do.

    Williamson: That’s so weird!

    Siega: I feel like every other time would be smelly.

    Williamson: That’s so big and epic, and I always go small and intimate. I always go with, like, I want to meet my parents when they were teenagers — things like that. I want to see how my dad grew up. I’d go that route — but I don’t know if that’s true, if I’d actually do what Genesis said and go back and buy Apple [stock].

    “Time After Time” premieres March 5th on ABC.

  • ‘The Omen’: 10 Things You (Probably) Didn’t Know About the Horror Classic

    Four decades later, we’re still haunted by the chilling thousand-yard stare of little Harvey Stephens as Damien in “The Omen.”

    Released 40 years ago this week (on June 25, 1976), the occult horror film would mark the only significant acting role Stephens ever played, but it had a vast and lasting impact — it revived Damien”), launched a wave of Antichrist-themed movies, and generated one of the most familiar (and overused) pieces of music in horror-movie history. In honor of the film turning four decades old, here are a few facts you need to know.1. A lot of “Omen” viewers have thought that rhyming-prophecy quotation actually comes from the Bible. It does not; screenwriter David Seltzer made it up. In fact, he claimed he’d never even read the Bible before being commissioned to write the screenplay.

    2. For the role of Ambassador Robert Thorn, the filmmakers initially sought biblical-film go-to guy Charlton Heston, but he worried that the result would be cheesy and passed. William Holden also turned down the part, claiming he found the satanic subject matter distasteful. Gregory Peck, whose career had been in such a slump that the 59-year-old was considering retirement, took the role for a fraction of his usual fee — just $250,000 against 10 percent of the film’s gross. When the movie became a smash, it gave Peck the most lucrative payday of his career. Holden, of course, accepted the lead in the 1978 sequel, “Damien: Omen II,” while Heston would star in “The Awakening,” a 1980 movie with a similar premise.3. Four-year-old Harvey Stephens (above) won the role of Damien during a group audition, when director Richard Donner asked the potential little Antichrists to attack him the way Damien attacks Katherine (Lee Remick) in the church. Stephens went further than the other boys, clawing Donner’s face and kicking him in the junk. That won Stephens the part, but Donner still didn’t think he was scary enough, so he had the blonde boy’s hair dyed black.

    4. In the life-imitates-art department, the movie’s shoot was beset by so many horrific accidents that the production seemed cursed.

    On the first day of the shoot, several crew members were in a car that was involved in a head-on collision. Peck and Seltzer both flew to England on airplanes that were struck by lightning during their flights, just eight hours apart. Producer Mace Neufeld flew to England a week later, and lightning struck his plane, too. In another instance, the production canceled a charter flight on a plane, which then took on new passengers and crashed, killing all on board. Eeriest of all was the accident that happened two months after “The Omen” opened, on Friday the 13th of August, 1976. John Richardson, the special effects designer behind such gruesome “Omen” deaths as the decapitation of Keith Jennings (David Warner) by a stray pane of glass, was in Holland working on the film “A Bridge Too Far” when his BMW crashed. His assistant Liz Moore, who was in the passenger seat, was cut in half. Supposedly, Richardson crawled out of the car and saw a road sign that said he was 66.6 kilometers away from the town of Ommen.5. The baboon attack on the car in the zoo sequence was accomplished by placing a baboon in the car with Lee Remick. At first, zookeepers used a baby baboon, but the other baboons didn’t seem to care. Then they put the alpha baboon in the car, and the rest of them went ape. The terror on Remick’s face wasn’t acting.

    6. No goldfish were harmed in the scene where the goldfish bowl shatters. Donner didn’t want to kill any fish just for the sake of shooting a movie, so he had dead sardines painted orange.7. To take advantage of the movie’s “666” motif, 20th Century Fox held sneak previews on June 6, 1976. When patrons came out of the auditorium, they were shown posters pointing out the 6/6/76 date, and many reportedly freaked out.

    8. Composer Jerry Goldsmith wrote some 300 movie and TV scores in his 50-year career, but the only one that earned him an Academy Award was “The Omen.” He was also nominated for Best Original Song for “Ave Satani,” the bombastic choral piece that’s become a staple of occult movie trailers ever since. It’s one of the few Best Song nominees in Oscar history whose lyrics aren’t in English. Rather, they’re in bad Latin. 9. Warner was asked once what became of the prop severed head (pictured) of his ill-fated “Omen” character. He quipped, “I lost it in the divorce.”

    10. “The Omen” cost $2.8 million to make and another $2.8 million to market. It made back $61 million in North America and became the fifth biggest hit of 1976. Donner has said the film made so much money for Fox, that it enabled the studio to give George Lucas the money he needed to finish “Star Wars” the way he wanted.

    %Slideshow-378108%