In theaters on December 12 is ‘Dust Bunny,’ written and directed by Bryan Fuller and starring Mads Mikkelsen, Sophie Sloan, Sigourney Weaver, David Dastmalchian, Rebecca Henderson, and Sheila Atim.
OkMLUBIwjXXhDRz2ibW106Related Article: ‘Star Trek: Discovery’: Bryan Fuller Out as Showrunner
Initial Thoughts
In creating a fantastical world, one has to make it seem believable and real even if it only obeys the rules of its own internal logic. With his feature directorial debut, ‘Dust Bunny,’ Bryan Fuller imagines a surreal vision of what seems to be New York City, yet never makes it or the characters in his story feel three-dimensional.
Famous for creating cult TV shows like ‘Pushing Daisies’ and ‘Hannibal,’ but more recently known for exiting series like ‘American Gods’ and ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ in their early stages or seasons, Fuller shows visual flair with his first film and also benefits from the presence of his ‘Hannibal’ star, Mads Mikkelsen. But ‘Dust Bunny’ never truly comes alive and is far too drawn-out for its own good.
Story and Direction
In an old yet ornate apartment building in what is supposed to be New York’s Chinatown, 10-year-old Aurora is convinced that the dust bunnies under her bed have evolved into a carnivorous monster that has pursued her throughout her young life, eating her previous foster parents and now targeting her new ones. When said parents are seemingly consumed, she enlists the help of her Intriguing Neighbor (Mads Mikkelsen) – that’s how he’s listed in the credits – an assassin who is skilled at killing more human monsters but is reluctant at first to help Aurora.
A movie not giving its characters actual names usually raises red flags for us, indicating a frustrating lack of development of those characters. The same could be said for both the story and setting of ‘Dust Bunny’: while it’s meant to be surreal, it’s all too vaguely defined to truly capture our imaginations. It’s as if Fuller, who also wrote the piece, never bothered to go back after his first draft and add more texture and life to his story. It never feels real enough for us to care about what happens to Aurora and the Intriguing Neighbor, although the actors themselves work to give the film some emotional heft.
But even the game cast can’t work around Fuller’s enervated direction and drawn-out pacing, which includes long stretches of looping dialogue that start out as jokes but ends up tiresome and far too repetitive. There are scenes of violence that are gore-free but still jarring within the fairy tale tone of the film, and while there are hints at a broader subtextual metaphor about abuse and neglect of children – and preserving their innocence in a vicious world – they’re also as vexingly hazy as much of the rest of the film.
There are elements here that do have the making of an interesting dark fantasy film, and as noted earlier, Fuller does have an excellent eye for richly detailed compositions and a baroque use of color and shadow. But it often seems like his visuals are searching for a better story.
Cast and Performances
Mads Mikkelsen makes everything he’s in better, and his reunion with Fuller for the first time since he starred as Hannibal Lecter on three seasons of ‘Hannibal’ is one of the best aspects of ‘Dust Bunny.’ Even though his character is so underwritten that he doesn’t even have a name, Mikkelsen does his best to bring the world-weary professional killer to life, and makes his growing fondness for Aurora feel credible.
Little Sophie Sloan is adorable as Aurora, but her line delivery and range are still works in progress. Her finest moments come in some of the tender exchanges with Mikkelsen. Sigourney Weaver shows up as Laverne, who might be Mikkelsen’s boss, lover, or mentor (he confusingly calls her ‘mother’ at one point), and while Weaver always stands out as usual, the character is more of a cartoon character than anything else. Same goes for David Dastmalchian’s briefly seen and even more ridiculously named Conspicuously Inconspicuous Man.
Final Thoughts
We wish there was more to ‘Dust Bunny’ underneath its gleaming, stylish surface, since there are the inklings of an interesting world here – where monsters both human and inhuman are possibly interchangeable – and because there is the budding of a sweet father-daughter relationship between Mikkelsen’s gruff hitman and Sloan’s irrepressible Aurora.
But at 106 minutes, ‘Dust Bunny’ has too thin a story to take up so much time, and not enough charm in its setting or narrative to do anything but test one’s patience. We’re not sure who it’s for either: the violence is probably too much for younger viewers while the story may not hook adults. Bryan Fuller has often displayed a singular imagination, but ‘Dust Bunny’ is too insular and half-formed to truly showcase the man’s talents.
‘Dust Bunny’ receives a score of 50 out of 100.
What is the plot of ‘Dust Bunny’?
When a monster under her bed seemingly eats her mother and father, a 10-year-old girl named Aurora (Sophie Sloan) living in New York City asks her mysterious hitman neighbor (Mads Mikkelsen) to help kill the beast.
Who is in the cast of ‘Dust Bunny’?
- Mads Mikkelsen as the Intriguing Neighbor
- Sophie Sloan as Aurora
- Sigourney Weaver as Laverne
- Sheila Atim as Brenda
- David Dastmalchian as Inconspicuously Conspicuous Man
- Rebecca Henderson as Intimidating Woman
- Line Kruse as Mother
- Caspar Phillipson as Father
Series Written By Bryan Fuller:
- ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine‘ (1993-1999)
- ‘Star Trek: Voyager‘ (1995-2001)
- ‘Carrie‘ (2002)
- ‘Dead Like Me‘ (2003-2004)
- ‘Wonderfalls‘ (2004)
- ‘Heroes‘ (2006-2010)
- ‘Pushing Daisies‘ (2007-2009)
- ‘Mockingbird Lane‘ (2012)
- ‘Hannibal‘ (2013-2015)
- ‘American Gods‘ (2017-2021)
- ‘Star Trek: Discovery‘ (2017-2024)
Buy Tickets: ‘Dust Bunny’ Movie Showtimes
Buy Mads Mikkelsen Movies on Amazon
W57EHiqw
Mad Sweeney, the supersized leprechaun of “American Gods,” has an uncanny knack for inducing as many punches and blows to his person as he is able to conjure gold coins out of thin air. And actor 
The new Starz’s new series “American Gods,” adapted from the bestselling novel by fantasy author Hannibal”).
“I woke up thinking, Who had the crystal ball all this time?” laughs Bedaki. “I guess Neil sees into the future. I’m absolutely stunned at how something that was written in 2001 and was filmed last year has become so incredibly topical. Every episode now I’m seeing through a new lens. It’s possible that as artists we were tapping into the psyche, and feeling something that was on the horizon, because I think viewers are going to be absolutely fascinated by how relevant all of this is at this time.”
For many of the actors in the series, the mythic nature of the material and the iconic gods that populate it provided an initial allure. Jones says that his role, Mr. Nancy, derived from the African deity Anansi, “has been a character my great grandparents and grandparents have been reading to me since before I knew what Neil Gaiman was. In that sense, I guess it’s always been a part of my life.”
Others, like 
Ultimately for Gaiman, with all the increasing urgency and zeitgeist appeal that the show has accumulated, it was the simple pleasure of seeing characters he conceived and lines of dialogue he wrote come to life on the soundstage that resonated the most. “In Episode 2, watching 
“American Gods” is shaping up to be one of the most eagerly awaited television events of 2017 — even for the actors appearing in it.
“There’s a lot of people who feel very left behind, on both sides of the political spectrum,” he continued. “You always know that the source material is on point when the themes can carry forward 20 some odd years after it was originated.”
“I’d already read the book when it originally came out, and the first thing that hit me was that it is an immigration story,” Badaki explained. “I’m originally from Nigeria, and only recently became a citizen. And there’s so much with all the stories of these old gods being brought into present day. You see all these different immigration stories, so that was the one thing that resonated immediately for me.”
“Star Trek: Discovery” has to live up to high expectations, so a recent development may raise some eyebrows.
William Shatner (actor, Capt. James T. Kirk, “Star Trek: The Original Series,” “Star Trek” theatrical films I-VI, “Star Trek: Generations”): We’ve invented, through science fiction, a mythology, and “Star Trek” is a huge part of that. So many great science fiction writers had ideas for “Star Trek,” even if they didn’t write exactly for “Star Trek,” so it was 50 years as a mere television show, and through various iterations expanded to affect a great deal of our culture, far beyond anything we know.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”): Initially, when I watched the show in the ’60s, it meant what everybody talks about as that inclusion of different characters, different races, and hope for the future — all the kind of stuff that we know about. And then, when I was in college, it was about great fun and getting your mind off of your school work and everything just for an hour, just to not really concentrate on other things, having a good time.
Star Trek: Voyager”): It’s an optimistic, hopeful view of what we could possibly achieve in the future as humanity. If we can get it together. That’s what Gene was so brilliant at with the original series, in the very beginning, was showing in the height of the Cold War, a Russian officer on the bridge. Not that long after World War II, a Japanese officer on the bridge. Blacks, whites, women, everybody. And everyone was together and everyone worked together.
Adam Savage (“Mythbusters” host, “Star Trek” fan): I grew up with the original series airing on television in the early ’70s. I watched every episode a million times. Science fiction has always had these two pulls, but one of them was about real social commentary, and that’s where “Star Trek’s” strengths are. I grew up inculcated with a sort of lovely liberal, diverse ethic that “Star Trek” baked right into the show, and that came right from Roddenberry.
1. Producer 
3. For the part of Hannibal Lecktor (yep, that’s how it was spelled in the script), the producers thought of 
5. Noonan ultimately decided not to research any real-life serial killers to prepare for his role, but others on the set did. To learn how investigators cope with the disturbing details of such cases, Petersen consulted with the FBI Behavioral Science Unit and Chicago Police detective Charles Adamson — the co-creator of Mann’s “Crime Story” TV series and the inspiration for 
8. Petersen claims the scene of Graham falling asleep on a plane while examining crime scene photos had to be shot guerrilla-filmmaking style, as United Airlines had declined to give the production permission to shoot on a commercial jetliner. Mann bought coach tickets anyway on a 4 p.m. United flight from Chicago to Florida, so that there would be a sunset visible from the right side of the plane, and the crew packed their cameras and lights in their carry-on bags. (This was in the days before 9/11 and omnipresent metal detectors at airports.) They filmed the scene on the fly — literally — and compensated the passengers and the startled and upset flight crew for the nuisance by giving away “Miami Vice” crew jackets.
11. Like the real-life profilers Petersen had met, he couldn’t shake the job at the end of the day. After “Manhunter,” he went on to do a play in Chicago but kept feeling the Will Graham character coming out in his performance. He finally shaved his beard, cut his hair, and dyed it blond so he’d see a different face when he looked in the mirror.
13. Mann hired cinematographer 
Fifty years after the dawn of its original five-year mission, it’s clear that there’s very likely no final frontier when it comes to “Star Trek.” And even as fans celebrate its rich history on the 50th anniversary,