Tag: brendan-fraser

  • ‘Batgirl’ Directors “Shocked” by the Decision to Shelve it

    Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah from Disney+’s ‘Ms. Marvel.’
    Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah from Disney+’s ‘Ms. Marvel.’

    There was shock and disbelief yesterday when reports began to emerge that Warner Bros. Discovery had decided to ditch the DC title ‘Batgirl’ – even though the movie had finished shooting and was in the middle of post-production.

    That feeling of disbelief was shared by the directors of the movie, Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah. The duo, who had previously worked on the likes of ‘Bad Boys for Life’ and the Disney+ series ‘Ms. Marvel,’ have been quick to respond.

    El Arbi and Fallah (who had been taking a quick break from editing the movie for El Arbi’s wedding in Morocco) were informed of the studio’s decision a short time before the news began to emerge into the world. And now they have hit Instagram to express their stunned feelings over the move.

    “We are saddened and shocked by the news. We still can’t believe it,” the directing duo wrote in the post. “As directors, it is critical that our work be shown to audiences, and while the film was far from finished, we wish that fans all over the world would have had the opportunity to see and embrace the final film themselves. Maybe one day they will.”

    They continue, “Our amazing cast and crew did a tremendous job and worked so hard to bring Batgirl to life. We are forever grateful to have been part of that team. It was a dream to work with such fantastic actors like Michael Keaton, J.K. Simmons, Brendan Fraser, Jacob Scipio, Corey Johnson, Rebecca Front and especially the great Leslie Grace, who portrayed Batgirl with so much passion, dedication and humanity.”

    “In any case, as huge fans of Batman since we were little kids, it was a privilege and an honor to have been a part of the DCEU, even if it was for a brief moment,” the statement ends. “‘Batgirl’ For Life.”

    https://www.instagram.com/p/CgzisvCMwmk/

    Though there had been talk of problematic test screenings or issues with the movie’s quality, the studio’s own statement refutes that.

    “The decision to not release ‘Batgirl’ reflects our leadership’s strategic shift as it relates to the DC universe and HBO Max,” it read. “Leslie Grace is an incredibly talented actor and this decision is not a reflection of her performance. We are incredibly grateful to the filmmakers of ‘Batgirl’ and ‘Scoob! Holiday Haunt’ (the animated movie that was scrapped at the same time as the superhero adventure) and their respective casts and we hope to collaborate with everyone again in the near future.”

    Batgirl herself, Leslie Grace, added her own statement, via Twitter.

    “I feel blessed to have worked among absolute greats and forged relationships for a lifetime in the process!” she wrote. “To every Batgirl fan – THANK YOU for the love and belief, allowing me to take on the cape and become, as Babs said best, ‘my own damn hero!’” You can see her full stamen below…

    Turns out the real reason for the change was something far more mundane – the incoming executive team is changing the direction of how Warner Bros. handles its DC titles (again) and ‘Batgirl’ fell through the cracks as a movie that wasn’t big enough to justify the budget to upgrade and market it for theatrical release, as it had been planned as a direct-to-HBO Max movie.

    The corporate decision was made to write it off on taxes as a loss, as part of an accounting technique in the wake of the merger between Warner Bros. and Discovery that allows for such moves.

    It’s only available for a limited time, so other movies including ‘Blue Beetle’ seem safe for now.

    Yet to our thinking, this is just another sign that Warner Bros. still appears to have very little idea how to plan for and execute a coherent strategy for its DC movie universe.

    Robert Pattinson as Batman
    Robert Pattinson as Batman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ action adventure “The Batman,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Jonathan Olley/™ & © DC Comics. Copyright: © 2021 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    There are various strands, between the DCEU and the unconnected likes of ‘The Batman’, with different versions of characters floating around.

    Merging Warner Bros. and DC has led to even more chaos, as a new executive team arrives and decides to change up the thinking once again. Plenty of other projects in development and existing shows are being cancelled as the corporate strategy shifts.

    While at one point the studio was all about sharing content between theatrical and HBO Max (and, during the pandemic, releasing everything day-and-date), it now appears to be intent on keeping bigger theatrical titles in their lane and making fewer movies for the streaming service in order to cut costs.

    We’re still not sure that this all sounds like a good idea, at least not until Warner/Discovery and DC has a workable policy for its movies and TV series. While not everyone has to look to Marvel, Disney’s approach to essentially letting Kevin Feige and his creative partners control every aspect of their output has paid dividends and (largely) delighted fans.

    Warners is said to be on the hunt for someone who can offer similar guidance on the DC front, though picking from the comic book company’s ranks or the movie side hasn’t yet led to firm success.

    DC has certainly had hits – ‘Aquaman’ made more than a billion dollars, while ‘Joker’ brought both big box office and Oscar-winning kudos.

    Dwayne Johnson as Black Adam
    Dwayne Johnson as Black Adam in New Line Cinema’s action adventure ‘Black Adam,’ a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Copyright: © 2022 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved. Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures.

    But all this chopping and changing has not been good for the movies’ reputation, and while DC has ‘Black Adam’, ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’ and ‘Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom’ on the way, they’ll all need to perform to stop the concern over output quality and the direction behind the films as a whole.

    And while ‘The Flash’ – whose future remains in flux while star Ezra Miller continues to bring the wrong type of press – seems destined to still get the blockbuster treatment, it’s really not a great look to effectively flush a movie directed by and starring people of color down the corporate toilet to serve the needs of shareholders.

    Plus, it’s hardly the best sign to creative people who might want to work with you in future and are now concerned that their hard work may end up on a shelf forever.

    Leslie Grace as Batgirl
    Leslie Grace in HBO Max’s ‘Batgirl.’
    ZrgylANW9Knnvd5MlANST7
  • Warner Bros. Discovery to Shelve Leslie Grace’s ‘Batgirl’

    Leslie Grace as Batgirl
    Leslie Grace in Warner Bros. Discovery’s ‘Batgirl.’

    Call it a Bat Cave-in.

    In a surprising development, Warner Bros. Discovery and DC have apparently decided to shelve the ‘Batgirl’ movie, which was going through the post-production process and had been targeting a theatrical release or an HBO Max debut (depending on which report you read).

    Now though, the movie, which had a reported budget that began in the $70 million range and ballooned to $90 million because of Covid protocols, is no longer going to be seen in any venue, not even a home entertainment release. There had been stories of disappointing test screenings and complaints about the lack of spectacle in the movie.

    Which means that Warners – fresh off its acquisition by Discovery – is willing to cut its losses and abandon the film. It’s all part of a new strategy that will focus on the bigger budget theatrical DC Extended Universe movies. ““This is the end of DC as a hobby,” a source told the New York Post, which originally broke the story.

    Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah from Disney+’s ‘Ms. Marvel.’
    Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah from Disney+’s ‘Ms. Marvel.’

    Bad Boys for Life’ and ‘Ms. Marvel’ directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah had been overseeing the new movie, which stars ‘In the Heights’ actress Leslie Grace starring as Barbara Gordon. The exact plot of the film hadn’t been released, but it’ll effectively follow Gordon (the daughter of J.K. Simmons’ Commissioner Jim Gordon) donning her version of a Bat-suit to fight crime in Gotham City.

    In addition to Grace and Simmons, the movie stars Brendan Fraser as the villainous Firefly and Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne/Batman.

    It’s a confusing move since the company had been trying to put more of a plan in place for its DC output. There remain concerns over ‘The Flash’, given the negative press around star Ezra Miller’s unorthodox behavior and run-ins with the law off screen.

    And the issue of who is the official Batman remains up the air too – Robert Pattinson’s Bruce Wayne from ‘The Batman’ exists outside of the DCEU, while Ben Affleck had repeatedly said he’s ready to hang up the cowl yet will appear in both ‘The Flash’ and (as Bruce Wayne even if he doesn’t suit up) in ‘Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom’, as revealed – accidentally – by a studio backlot tour stopping by where Jason Momoa was working on additional footage for the superhero sequel.

    Then there are the other DC movies. While ‘Blue Beetle’ appears to still be on track (for now, and it has the relative security of being firmly aimed at a theatrical release), a third ‘Wonder Woman’ remains in limbo.

    The studio still has ‘Black Adam’ due in theaters on October 21st, ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’ out on December 21st, then ‘Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom’ March 17th and (assuming it sticks), ‘The Flash’ on June 23rd.

    There were warning signs about ‘Batgirl’ last month when Warners/DC said nothing about the movie in its big Comic-Con presentation. But we’re not sure anybody had “completely shelved” on their bingo cards.

    ZrgylANW9Knnvd5MlANST7
  • Alicia Silverstone On Leslie Grace’s ‘Batgirl’

    Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl in 1997's 'Batman & Robin'
    Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl in 1997’s ‘Batman & Robin’

    Last weekend, actress Leslie Grace posted on her Instagram account a photo of herself in her new costume for HBO Max’s upcoming ‘Batgirl’ movie.

    The movie, which is currently filming in Scotland, will be the first time the character has appeared in a live-action feature film since Alicia Silverstone first played the role in ‘Batman & Robin.’ Silverstone, best known for playing the iconic Cher Horowitz in Clueless, starred opposite George Clooney and Arnold Schwarzenegger in the 1997 movie, which was directed by Joel Schumacher.

    Moviefone recently had the chance to speak exclusively with Alicia Silverstone about her upcoming shark movie, ‘The Requin,’ which will be released in theaters, on digital, and On Demand beginning January 28th. We also asked the actress her thoughts on Leslie Grace’s new Batgirl costume, and if she had any words of encouragement for the young actress taking on the iconic role.

    Leslie Grace as 'Batgirl'
    (Via Instagram)

    “I didn’t get to see it,” Silverstone said of Grace’s Instagram post. “I’m going to look it up now when we get off the phone. I’m just so excited for her. What an amazing experience she is going to have on this journey. I’m sure she is going to kill it. She doesn’t need any words (of encouragement) from me. She’s going to be great!”

    Grace, who was last seen in director Jon M. Chu’s ‘In the Heights,’ will be joined in ‘Batgirl’ by Oscar winner J.K. Simmons, who is reprising his role from ‘Justice League’ as Barbara Gordon’s father, GCPD Commissioner James Gordon. Also reprising his role from ‘Batman,’ ‘Batman Returns,’ and the upcoming ‘The Flash,’ will be Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne/Batman.

    Directed by Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah (‘Bad Boys for Life’), the movie will also feature Brendan Fraser as the villain, Firefly. ‘Batgirl’ is scheduled for release on HBO Max sometime later this year.

    (L to R) Alicia Silverstone, George Clooney, and Chris O'Donnell in 1997's 'Batman & Robin'
    (L to R) Alicia Silverstone, George Clooney, and Chris O’Donnell in 1997’s ‘Batman & Robin’
    1112524 ZrgylANW9Knnvd5MlANST7 wJs4QIXpbbquGE7D0aawV5
  • Don Cheadle, Jon Hamm, more stars talk ‘No Sudden Move’

    Don Cheadle, Jon Hamm, more stars talk ‘No Sudden Move’

    cflQO71x

    No Sudden Move,’ Steven Soderbergh‘s new crime thriller, is set in Detroit in 1954, and the film boasts a very impressive cast. Don Cheadle, Benecio Del Toro, and Kieran Culkin play a trio of hoods, Brendan Fraser plays the man that put the trio together, and David Harbour, Amy Seimetz, and Noah Jupe play the family that the hoods take hostage. Bill Duke and Ray Liotta play crime lords, and Jon Hamm plays the detective trying to get to the bottom of it all. The cast of the movie took some time to tell us about their characters and the movie’s twists and turns.

    Don Cheadle and Benecio Del Toro talk about working with director Steven Soderbergh.


    Moviefone: Don, did you see the tension in the film when you signed on?


    Don Cheadle:
    Yeah, I really enjoyed the script that Ed Solomon wrote. I thought it was really good. And when I knew Benicio was in, it was a no-brainer to say yes, and we had a lot of fun. It was pretty intense working under those conditions. We were one of the first projects to come back with the COVID protocols and Steven wrote the protocols for the DGA. So we felt like we were in good hands with him, but it was, yeah, the whole thing was an experience and shooting in Detroit and these locations that are still there, this great architecture in these cars and then the costumes. It was just great.

    MF: Benecio, how do you describe these two characters, these two guys, and what they do and who they are?

    Benicio Del Toro: Well, I think they are two criminals that come together and they just go on this journey to, led by greed, or so we think, and then we go on this roller coaster of all kinds of situations that happens to them, and the betrayals that happen and all that stuff. I think this movie’s a lot of fun that way.

    Cheadle: No doubt.

    MF: I just talked to Ray Liotta and he summed it up by saying, “Everybody is scummy,” and I thought that was kind of perfect. What I really love too, Don, is I feel like as an audience member, I was finding out things and discovering things along with the characters.

    Cheadle: Yeah. That’s some of the fun of this, I think, is that you don’t really get ahead of it. You don’t know what’s going to happen and things keep being revealed along the way. People’s motivations are shifting and allegiances that you think are one way go the other way. And I think between David and Benicio’s and my character, we’re all on these separate journeys that somehow come together, which is really a testament to the script and Steven.

    Del Toro: Yeah. Yeah.

    MF: Benicio, what is it about Steven Soderbergh, or a Soderbergh production?

    Del Toro: I tell you what, he gets you home early while you’re shooting on the movie. We finish about 10 days early. I think he knows exactly what he wants.

    Cheadle: Yeah.

    Del Toro: He knows that story back and forth better than anyone on the set. And he’s just a 100% there while you’re shooting. He’s like a machine. And the minute I knew that Don Cheadle and Steven Soderbergh were attached to the project, Steven called me up and I said, “I’m in. I don’t have to read it.” It was that simple for me. So I’m just happy that the movie also is working.

    MF: It worked so well, and I was thinking about the name of the movie, No Sudden Move, because as I was watching it, when any of you guys made a move, I was like, “Oh, well, that’s not good. That door opening, that’s not good.”

    Cheadle: Right.

    MF: It’s literally someone turned their head and I was like, “Oh, what’s about to happen next?” I mean, it was a fun little ride.

    Cheadle: Yeah. The movie was renamed during production because the other name that it had that we won’t even bring up was used by another movie. So Steven just kind of came up with “No Sudden Move.” And he said before he even kind of told us that he was on the set and the guy drove by in a car and said, “What’s this movie?” And he said, “It’s called No Sudden Move.” And the guy said, “Sounds like a thriller.” And he went, “Okay, that title works.”

    MF: Thank you to that guy for driving by and saying that.

    Del Toro: Yeah. That’s right.

    MF: I also liked the idea in your work that you guys do, you really have to trust your director and editors and all that, but the world that these guys live in the characters, there’s no trust.

    Cheadle: No trust. Yeah. Nobody trusts anybody. Everybody’s waiting for the person next to them to cut their legs out from under him, which is great. I mean, it’s cool for the audience, I think, to try to figure out who’s scummier than the last, and who’s going to come out on top.

    Del Toro: Right.

    Cheadle: And I think the film holds that tension for the whole time.


    Bill Duke and Brendan Fraser discuss how the movie keeps the audience guessing.

    MF: I can’t remember the last time I cussed this much watching a movie because every time something happened, because it was really a ride. Did you guys have that kind of same experience being in the movie, Bill?

    Bill Duke: Well, working with the actors that we worked with, was a wonderful experience. And following the script, it’s like, it’s one thing to memorize your lines, but when you’re in a scene with Don Cheadles of the world and the Matt Damons et cetera, and all the actors, it was like a very, very, very insightful, wonderful experience. Put it that way.

    MF: Brendan, and the same for you, kind of just riding the moment?

    Brendan Fraser: I knew it would be exciting. It’s a multi-layered screenplay with plenty of twists and turns. It’ll keep you guessing. It’s a story of redemption in many ways. Although we see these anti-heroes that populate the screen and everyone gets what they deserve by stories. And I felt great knowing that this is a genre that Steven Soderbergh absolutely excels with. And I guess the excitement just came mostly from seeing the film in its entirety and going, wow, that’s the product that you get when you work with the best that there is in the business. It was exciting.

    MF: I really enjoyed, as a member of the audience, that I felt like I was finding out stuff, as you guys were founding out, or the characters, like we were all in it together.

    Duke: And that’s not easy to do, because the thing is, as I said before, he has the ability to stay ahead of the audience, because once the audience catches up, you’re done. Right? And he doesn’t do it in a corny way. I mean, he just hooks you and just takes you through his journey until the end. And sometimes there’s not an end-to-end, but it’s the end of the movie, but there’re other things that’s why this movie didn’t have an end-end. Don walks off, right? But what is he walking off into? Nobody knows. He doesn’t even know really.

    Fraser: And he entered the world of this film with a walk too. So it really completes his journey. And as the credits roll, we learned that the overriding theme of what we’ve seen and how exciting it is, and it is. Prior to that, there’s some truth to what really happened in those days, with regard to what the prize is in this film that everyone’s chasing up. And they’re all chasing something different. Exactly. And that’s really the technology behind the catalytic converter, which is, was suppressed by the car companies for some 25 years, until it was mandated by law, that this technology is put into cars so that we can all breathe cleaner air. And it leaves you wondering, why couldn’t we have done this sooner? Well, there’s some very powerful forces of greed at work in our world. And hopefully we can move on from there. I don’t know. That’s the answer. That’s the takeaway I get from it.

    MF: Quickly tell me like who your characters are. Brendan, who is Jones?

    Fraser: Doug Jones likely fought in the war. He survived it. I don’t think he participated in a way that… I just think he probably got up to no good during that time. Came back to America and didn’t get with society and the program and decided that a life of crime was his. He’s working his way up the management chain of organized crime. I found it helpful to understand the character as being rotten to the core by wearing false teeth that were really nasty. He gets his, just like everybody else. So I’m not telling tales out of school.

    MF: And Bill for you is, is your character just a bad-ass boss?

    Duke: No, he is part of a tradition. I think his family, his father was an O.G. and I think his father’s father, maybe it was what they taught him was about power. In power, you don’t talk power. You be power. As I said before, if I know where your kids go to school and where you asleep, I’m going to ask you a question. And I just expect an honest answer, because you’ll know if you lie to me, there’ll be consequences.


    Amy Seimetz and Frankie Shaw share their experiences making the movie.

    Moviefone: Frankie, let’s talk about life on the set. What is life on a Steven Soderbergh set like? What was that experience?

    Frankie Shaw: So he’s super collaborative. He makes you feel like you’re a genius and he knows exactly what he wants, and has the whole movie in his head already. And there’s no fat on it, so he just shoots what he needs, because he’s going to edit later that day. And yeah, it’s like a really fun vibe. He’s serious and he’s jokey. And he’s just like maybe the smartest person we’ve probably ever met.

    MF: Well, that’s a nice review of a guy. I was talking about this movie, how, what you guys do, you trust your director, you trust your sound people and your editors, but this world that we’re living in, there’s no trust for anyone in any of these characters. I didn’t trust anyone from the very beginning, and that helped me throughout the entire movie.

    Amy Seimetz: I think that’s part of the fun and part of, with the twists and turns, it’s like, you’re never, in the way that he’s shooting it, even just watching it again and also being on set and seeing how he framed everything. Everything’s like a little off-kilter, so you never feel completely grounded. And that goes for with the characters too. You can’t trust, you’re never on firm grounding with any of the characters.

    MF: Yeah, Frankie, I thought the name of the movie was perfect because as a viewer, as an audience member, anytime anyone in the film made a sudden move, or any kind of move, I was like, well, that’s a bad sign. Like if a door opened, I was like, that’s a bad sign. Someone looked to the left. I was like, what’s he looking at?

    Shaw: Yeah, there wasn’t a lot of reason for these characters to trust. So then they became untrustworthy, I felt like. But if you really go, and all the actors were so incredible. And I feel like did such a good job bringing in the history, their history to the current moment of where they were at. And so, I don’t know, even through their deep untrustworthiness, you really felt for them.

    Jon Hamm and Noah Jupe talk about the complex plot.

    Moviefone: Jon, my gift and curse in life is that I can usually tell where a movie is going. I’m like, I see what’s happening here. This movie proved me wrong time and time again in the best way possible. Did you see that when you guys first signed on?

    Jon Hamm: It’s baked into the script, for sure. The complexity is there on purpose and Ed Solomon is a phenomenal writer and set out to write a very twisty and turny heist movie, essentially about the catalytic converter, which on its face sounds like a ridiculous idea, but is actually, especially because it’s based on true events and reality, it’s an ambitious story to tell, and it’s a very compelling story. Cause it wraps up so much about American history and racial politics and how the car culture basically ruined neighborhoods in inner cities that were low income and majority minority neighborhoods. And this is all part of history that kind of got literally bulldozed, but it should not be forgotten.

    MF: Noah, your character is one of the few people I trusted in this movie. How did you find him? What did you make of Matthew?

    Noah Jupe: I really liked Matthew. I thought he was really interesting. I connected with him a lot. I feel like in that situation, I had actually hoped I would also do the same thing as he did. I thought it was very strong. He knew he could read a person very well. I felt like he knew exactly who to trust and when to trust them, and who he couldn’t quite get a handle on. And for example, his relationship with Don’s character is very interesting. Because I think by the end of the meeting, I think they always do trust each other a little bit. And so it’s very interesting to explore that in the scenes and yeah. Honestly, I just love playing Matthew.

    MF: Jon, what was life like on a Steven Soderbergh set? What is that experience?

    Hamm: You feel very taken care of. I will say that, especially given the fact that we were shooting this in October-November of last year, so pretty deep into the pandemic situation in Michigan, but you definitely feel there was a very strong hand on the tiller, so you know that there’s a plan for the day, there’s a plan in case something goes wrong, everything is planned out, and you get your work done, and then you go home. And we were all staying in the same hotel. We were in a bubble, so to speak. So, we all got to go home early and have dinner like adults. And it was very much a professionally run set. And then to be able to be a part of something that’s so creatively ambitious and beautifully crafted was kind of a bonus.


    Lastly, Ray Liotta and Julia Fox discuss their married character’s relationship.

    Moviefone: I don’t know if this is a direct reflection of the movie, but I no longer trust either one of you. That’s kind of the world we’re living in. Ray, what was it about this whole concept that made you want to sign on?

    Ray Liotta: Well, basically I liked the script, and to work with Steven. I’d worked with Don before, not Benicio, which I wanted to do. So, the combination of things made me… Yeah, I was just in and out really quick, but I just wanted to do it.

    MF: Julia, this whole concept of we can’t trust one person. You literally can’t trust the next guy. Did you see that in the script originally when you first read it, or did it kind of open itself up as you guys shot the film?

    Julia Fox: It definitely opened itself up, I think. I did not see what I did coming at all. But I totally understood it, and I sympathized with her, and I think being a woman in the forties must’ve been really tough, and she wanted to level the playing field. So, I loved her and when I read her. I said, “this is me, I can do this, I have to do this, I was born to do this,” and I did.

    MF: Let’s talk about their relationship, then. This is a couple, you two play a couple? But it’s complicated, is it not?

    Liotta: Yeah. No question. I think we probably got married young, and I was doing the stuff that I do, and she ends up cheating on me. And so, it was just interesting.

    Fox: You deserved it, though. (Laughing)

    MF: Julia, how did you find the relationship? What did you make of it?

    Fox: Yeah, it just seemed like what Ray said, that back in those days, a woman’s worth was dictated by who she’s married to. And if you’re not married, you’re worthless. And if you… You know what I mean? And, I think it was that same thing. It was kind of out of opportunity, out of convenience. I’m sure maybe there was love or lust there at some point, but eventually love is not enough. Money comes then, and that’s the overpowering force, I think.

    And the theme of the root of this whole movie, is just the greed and desire for more, and it’s not enough. Keep pushing more, and more, and more, and never satisfied. And then eventually the house of cards falls.

    MF: I just watched the movie last night, Ray, and I’m still in knots. Did you get a sense of that when you guys were shooting? That this was going to be so tension filled?

    Liotta: Well, you don’t really know how they’re going to put it together, but each scene has, for lack of better words, a rhythm within itself in the way that it’s written. Yeah, but the stakes are intense, and I know Benicio, and I don’t know he’s fooling around with my wife. No, I do eventually figure it out, because I confront him.

    So, you never know how they’re going to put it together. It’s more Steven and the editors, with the music, and the way it’s cut that makes it move along.

    MF: I bet that’s interesting, though, because you do have to trust your director. You have to trust everyone on the crew. You have to trust your editors. And then this world that the movie encompasses is a world where no one trusts anyone else, there’s no trust at all.

    Liotta: Yeah. Not at all. Everyone’s kind of scummy.

    ‘No Sudden Move’ is now streaming on HBO Max.

    KHUMCoAjjNdSSHE9222bA3
  • 15 Things You Never Knew About ‘The Mummy’ on its 20th Anniversary

    15 Things You Never Knew About ‘The Mummy’ on its 20th Anniversary

    Universal Pictures

    It’s been 20 years since Universal delivered one of the best movie reboots of all time in “The Mummy.” No amount of lackluster sequels, direct-to-video spinoffs or re-reboots will dull the appeal of this modern-day classic. Celebrate that anniversary with some fun facts you might not know about the making of “The Mummy.”

    1. Universal originally planned on rebooting “The Mummy” as a low-budget horror film in the early 1990’s. Clive Barker was attached to direct, and the film would have focused on a modern-day museum curator attempting to raise an army of undead mummies.

    2. Tom Cruise was originally offered the lead role but turned it down. Cruise would go on to star in the 2017 reboot instead.

    Universal Pictures

    3. Because of the dangerous political situation in Egypt, most of the filming had to be done in Morocco instead.

    4. Even Morocco had its significant dangers. All the main cast members had to have kidnapping insurance. Director Stephen Sommers opted not to inform his cast of this detail until after production wrapped.

    Universal Pictures

    5. Brendan Fraser nearly lost his life while filming the hanging scene. According to Rachel Weisz, he stopped breathing and had to be resuscitated.

    6. Fraser’s colleagues didn’t fare much better. Everyone on set was required to drink a specially created beverage every two hours in order to stay hydrated, and numerous crew members were hospitalized after being bitten or stung by poisonous animals.

    Universal Pictures

    7. The collapsing library stunt was achieved in a single take. That’s fortunate for the crew, as rebuilding the set would have taken a full day’s work.

    8. The character Ardeth Bay was originally supposed to have been killed off in the film’s climax, but Sommers rewrote that part after realizing he liked Oded Fehr too much. Fehr would instead reprise his role in “The Mummy Returns.”

    Universal Pictures

    9. Bay is also intended as an homage to the 1932 film. In that version, Imhotep himself takes up the cover identity of Ardeth Bay (an anagram for “Death by Ra”) when he tries to pass himself off as a modern Egyptian.

    10. One of the background extras can be seen wearing a cloak that was originally worn by Sir Alec Guinness during the filming of “Star Wars.” This was only discovered after filming was completed.

    Lucasfilm

    11. That cloak wasn’t the only classic Hollywood prop o be re-purposed during production. Many of the plastic dummies used to depict Imhotep’s victims were previously featured in 1985’s “Lifeforce.”

    12. Sommers originally planned on paying tribute to the classic Universal logo during the opening of the film. While he abandoned the idea, he re-purposed it in 2004’s “Van Helsing” instead.

    Universal Pictures

    13. If you’re wondering how scarabs could survive so long in Imhotep’s tomb without a food source, an earlier draft of the screenplay revealed that the scarabs themselves were affected by Imhotep’s curse after biting him.

    14. There are technically eight films in this incarnation of the “Mummy” franchise. The original film spawned two direct sequels and the 2003 spinoff “The Scorpion King,” which itself currently has three sequels and one prequel.

    Universal Pictures

    15. “The Mummy” and “The Mummy Returns” also inspired an animated series that ran for two seasons between 2001 and 2003.

  • Every Stephen Sommers Movie, Ranked

    Every Stephen Sommers Movie, Ranked

    Disney/Universal/Paramount

    Stephen Sommers isn’t a name you recognize, but for a while he was one of the hottest talents in Hollywood, cranking out surefire blockbusters that were, at times, understated literary adaptations, surprisingly successful remakes, and hot based-on-IP opportunities. He stopped making movies a half-decade ago, and honestly, the cinematic landscape is worse off without him. Even when he was making straight-from-the-studio product, his personality, full of effervescence and seemingly endless energy, was front and center.

    9. ‘Van Helsing’ (2004)

    Universal

    A perfect example of when too much is not enough. After Sommers had successfully resurrected “The Mummy” (something Tom Cruise couldn’t even accomplish), the set his sights on the other beloved Universal Monsters characters – all in the same movie – with Hugh Jackman essaying the famed vampire hunter, this time reimagined as a Indiana Jones-style swashbuckling hero. The result was overstuffed and underwritten, an oddly joyless affair from Sommers who seemed to mistake an abundance of visual effects for actual big screen magic. (You can feel the blood, sweat and tears Industrial Light & Magic put into this thing; it wasn’t enough.) Universal thought “Van Helsing” was going to be a franchise-spawning blockbuster and had planned a number of sequels, spin-offs (including a television series that was going to be filmed on the same sets, with a pilot directed by Sommers) and theme park attractions all lined up and ready to go. Unfortunately, this arrived with a stake through its heart.

    8. ‘Catch Me If You Can’ (1989)

    Orion

    Sommers’ debut feature, which is oddly hard to track down (I watched a badly cropped, standard definition version on Vudu), is a charming-enough teen rebellion movie that wouldn’t have been out of place in the 1950s. (It’s arguably his most personal, especially considering it was filmed in his hometown of St. Cloud, Minnesota.) But what “Catch Me if You Can” lacks in overtly modern sensibilities, it more than makes up for in spirited low-budget filmmaking, particularly when it comes to a climactic car race that would foretell Sommers’ burgeoning love of oversized action set pieces (there’s a great moment where the car changes colors). “Catch Me If You Can” also features a nifty, almost universally overlooked score by Tangerine Dream.

    7. ‘G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra’ (2009)

    Paramount/Hasbro

    What would turn out to be Sommers’ last studio feature was this adaptation of the famed Hasbro action figure line, which of course the director festooned with a historical backstory, elaborate action sequences that remain the obvious highlight (that chase through Paris in the robot suits is so cool) and an incredibly distracting Brendan Fraser cameo. By all accounts the production of “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” was an unmitigated disaster, with Sommers’ pitch as a high-tech James Bond update somehow becoming a muddled, overwrought extravaganza (with a script cobbled together by at least a half-dozen screenwriters before an impending writers’ strike) that is notable for having the most charisma-free Channing Tatum performance ever.

    6. ‘Odd Thomas’ (2013)

    Fusion Films

    A.k.a. the movie that would lead to Sommers quitting the business in frustration (I’m sure “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” contributed too), “Odd Thomas” was a notoriously difficult production even for a filmmaker well versed in notoriously difficult productions. Various actors (including 50 Cent and Tim Robbins) were announced for the film, only to never actually show up on screen, with the film being delayed for a lengthy amount of time following lawsuits and breach-of-contract filings from several of the production companies. But was an undeniably messy process gave way to a pretty fun little movie, with Sommers writing, producing and directing a spirited adaptation of a Dean Koontz bestseller. (For all his millions of book sold, solid adaptations of his work are almost nonexistent.) Anton Yelchin, as a small town psychic embroiled in a big time mystery, is a wonderful Sommers hero, and the movie’s surprising mixture of tones and style (oscillating between detective movie, supernatural thriller and flat-out tragedy) keeps you on your toes. If you’ve never seen it (and, chances are, you haven’t), it’s very much worth tracking down.

    5. ‘The Adventures of Huck Finn’ (1993)

    Disney

    You wouldn’t think a filmmaker so closely associated with cinematic bombast would be able to create a film this nuanced and soulful, but he really knocked it out of the park. Based on Mark Twain’s immortal American classic, Sommers wrote a terrific script, made more accessible for modern audiences but in no way sanitized, and gathered a great group of actors (Elijah Wood is Huck and Courtney B. Vance is Jim) for a film that feels tactile and real in ways that most of his later movies don’t. (This was, of course, before the director’s fascination with visual effects took hold.) Sommers would actually return to Twain for a “Tom and Huck” pseudo-sequel that Disney produced a couple of years later, writing and producing (but not directing). He tricked somebody else into doing that for him. Just like Huck.

    4. ‘The Mummy Returns’ (2001)

    Universal

    After the success of “The Mummy,” Sommers returned to the franchise almost immediately, turning in a sequel that was even more full of visual effects, wild set pieces, and, yes, mummies (our favorites are the pygmy mummies in that weird jungle oasis). It could be argued that the sequel is actual the superior film; funnier, perhaps, and grander. But there are also some key knocks against it: its story is too convoluted, the visual effects aren’t always successful (see the appearance of the Dwayne Johnson scorpion creature at the end), and the score by Alan Silvestri isn’t quite as much fun as the original’s by Jerry Goldsmith. Still, this movie totally rules and sees the director operating at the peak of his powers, a confident storyteller in full bloom.

    3. ‘The Jungle Book’ (1994)

    Disney

    Before Disney made a cottage industry out of their live-action adaptations of animated classics, Sommers made this really cool version of “The Jungle Book,” combining elements of the original Rudyard Kipling stories with features of the Disney animated film and combining them into something new and arresting. Jason Scott Lee plays an adult Mowgli who returns to the jungle to battle evil colonialists (obviously) and reconnect with his animal friends. Considering this was before the advent of the cutting-edge visual effects that would make the Jon Favreau remake possible (effects that Sommers himself has leaned on over the years), Sommers uses mostly real animals, in ways that are just as dazzling as any special effect.

    2. ‘The Mummy’ (1999)

    Universal

    Sommers’ biggest hit also one of his very best movies. Universal had toiled for years with how to bring back “The Mummy,” one of the crown jewels from its Universal Monsters brand, and after several failed attempts to update and modernize the property, Sommers basically said, “What if it was like an old movie serial?” And a hit was born. Full of winning performances (among them: Brendan Fraser, Rachel Weisz and John Hannah), globe-trotting adventure and genuinely eye-popping visual effects, “The Mummy” was breezy and fun, the kind of aw-shucks entertainment they rarely make in these cynical times.

    1. ‘Deep Rising’ (1998)

    Disney

    A year before Sommers broke big with “The Mummy,” he made his very best feature, an explosive, icky disaster/horror movie that was like what would happen if Peter Benchley wrote “The Poseidon Adventure.” Anchored by a rousingly wiseass performance by Treat Williams (hey, it was the 90s), “Deep Rising” follows a band of high tech pirates (they’d probably prefer to be called mercenaries) who are hired to rob a luxury cruise ship. Once on board, though, it’s clear that they aren’t the only ones crashing this party (the other guest has lots and lots of tentacles). This creature feature was besieged by production problems, largely owing to Disney’s insistence that they use Dream Quest Images for the visual effects (Disney had just purchased the effects house), which led to the film being delayed and, once complete, poorly marketed. But in the years since, it has become something of a cult classic, immortalized by a recent, wonderful Blu-ray release by Kino. “Deep Rising” is the Plutonic ideal of what a Stephen Sommers movie can be: smart, funny, scary and full of larger-than-life action set pieces.  

  • Brendan Fraser Cast as Robotman in DC Universe’s ‘Doom Patrol’

    Brendan Fraser Cast as Robotman in DC Universe’s ‘Doom Patrol’

    Trust, Brendan Fraser
    FX

    Love to see Brendan Fraser back in action.

    He’ll play Robotman/Cliff Steele in DC Universe’s upcoming live-action series “Doom Patrol.” Fraser will provide the voice of Robotman, Deadline reports, with Riley Shanahan playing the physical performance of Robotman in full body costume.

    Fraser will also appear in flashback scenes as former race car driver Cliff Steele, who was in a terrible accident that left his body uninhabitable. Steele’s brain was saved by Dr. Niles Caulder and lives on in the powerful robotic body.

    DC Universe is DC’s new digital subscription service — where fans will get to watch James Wan’s “Swamp Thing,” along with “Titans,” “Young Justice: Outsiders,” “Harley Quinn,” and more.

    Here’s the synopsis for “Doom Patrol”:

    “Doom Patrol” is a reimagining of one of DC’s strangest group of outcasts: Robotman, Negative Man, Elasti-Woman and Crazy Jane. Led by the mysterious Dr. Niles Caulder, they’re called into action by the ultimate hero for the digital age, Cyborg. Banding together these rejects find themselves on a mission that will take them to the weirdest and most unexpected corners of the DC Universe.”

    Diane Guerrero (“Orange is the New Black”) was previously cast as Crazy Jane.

    Jeremy Carver is writing the series, which he also executive produces with Geoff Johns, Greg Berlanti, and Berlanti Productions’ Sarah Schechter.

    “Doom Patrol” has a 13 episode straight-to-series order, for a 2019 premiere on DCUniverse.com, following “Titans.”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Brendan Fraser Felt ‘Depressed’ & ‘Reclusive’ After Alleged Groping From HFPA Boss

    A new GQ profile addresses the question “What ever happened to Brendan Fraser?”

    The now 49-year-old actor was everywhere in the ’90s and early ’00s — “The Mummy” movies, “George of the Jungle,” “Encino Man,” “Gods and Monsters,” “The Quiet American,” and Best Picture Oscar winner “Crash.” Then his career kind of fell off the face of the earth, or so it seemed.

    Fraser’s new “Trust” and “Condor.”

    In the interview, Fraser addressed an incident he said he didn’t have “the courage to speak up” about previously, “for risk of humiliation, or damage to my career.” It happened in 2003, he told GQ, at a luncheon held by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA), the organization that hosts the Golden Globes.

    Here’s that part of the story:

    On Fraser’s way out of the hotel, he was hailed by Philip Berk, a former president of the HFPA. In the midst of a crowded room, Berk reached out to shake Fraser’s hand. Much of what happened next Berk recounted in his memoir and was also reported by Sharon Waxman in The New York Times: He pinched Fraser’s ass—in jest, according to Berk. But Fraser says what Berk did was more than a pinch: “His left hand reaches around, grabs my ass cheek, and one of his fingers touches me in the taint. And he starts moving it around.” Fraser says that in this moment he was overcome with panic and fear.

    Fraser said he was eventually able to remove Berk’s hand but “felt ill.”

    “I felt like a little kid. I felt like there was a ball in my throat. I thought I was going to cry.”

    His reps asked the HFPA for a written apology. Philip Berk acknowledged to GQ that he did write a letter to Fraser, but qualified, “My apology admitted no wrongdoing, the usual ‘If I’ve done anything that upset Mr. Fraser, it was not intended and I apologize.’”

    After what happened, Fraser said:

    “I became depressed. I was blaming myself and I was miserable—because I was saying, ‘This is nothing; this guy reached around and he copped a feel.’ That summer wore on—and I can’t remember what I went on to work on next.” He said it “made me retreat. It made me feel reclusive.”

    He said he even wondered if the HFPA had blacklisted him, adding that he was rarely invited back to the Globes after 2003. Berk disputed that idea: “His career declined through no fault of ours.”

    AT&T AUDIENCE Network 2018 Winter TCAFraser is working with actress Mira Sorvino in the new Audience Network series “Condor,” and he addressed her and others in the #MeToo movement:

    “I know Rose [McGowan], I know Ashley [Judd], I know Mira [Sorvino]—I’ve worked with them. I call them friends in my mind. I haven’t spoken to them in years, but they’re my friends. I watched this wonderful movement, these people with the courage to say what I didn’t have the courage to say. […]

    Am I still frightened? Absolutely. Do I feel like I need to say something? Absolutely. Have I wanted to many, many times? Absolutely. Have I stopped myself? Absolutely.”

    On the phone, he breathes deeply. “And maybe I am over-reacting in terms of what the instance was. I just know what my truth is. And it’s what I just spoke to you.”

    Read his full profile for a lot more.

    So far, Fraser is getting support for his candor — and not just for the part about the HFPA story. Many fans are rooting for him to have a career “renaissance,” on par with Winona Ryder in “Stranger Things.”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Tom Cruise Pulls a Jon Snow in ‘The Mummy’ Trailer, So Is He a Mummy?

    Tom Cruise‘s character dies and comes back to life right in the trailer for the 2017 movie “The Mummy.” It seems like a giant spoiler, but apparently it’s only the beginning. But does that mean Cruise plays a Mummy in “The Mummy”?

    It’s a question Entertainment Weekly asked the director after the new trailer dropped. But, based on the knee-jerk fan reaction, the real question is “Where’s Brendan Fraser?” (The short answer is “You can see him on ‘The Affair.’”)

    Brendan Fraser starred as Rick O’Connell in “The Mummy” (1999), “The Mummy Returns” (2001), and “The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor” (2008). However, the first movie on “The Mummy” came out in 1932, so no one can really claim originality here. This new Mummy with Tom Cruise also stars “Star Trek Beyond” actress Sofia Boutella as the first woman in the titular role.

    Entertainment Weekly asked Alex Kurtzman about what it means to show Cruise’s character die then come back to life in the trailer. “Is Tom Cruise a Mummy in this movie? Or is that the visual iconography you were trying to create with that moment?”

    Here’s the director’s answer:

    There’s an origin story happening on two different fronts. I won’t tell you too much more than that, other than to say: One of the things that I think has defined Tom Cruise movies, for 30 years, is that Tom Cruise always saves the day. You know whenever you’re in a Tom Cruise movie that he’s gonna figure out a way to save the day. And that’s great, and it’s why I pay my money to see his movies. However, in the context of a monster movie, it’s challenging, because monster movies are about characters who are often very out of control, and don’t know how to save the day. The first thing I said to Tom was, “It’ll be scarier if we can take away the fundamental knowledge that you’re gonna solve the problem.”

    In the trailer, when he comes back to life, suddenly he’s in a situation where he has no idea what’s happening. It removes safety of: “He knows what he’s doing.” Once you remove that, and anything is possible, the movie can actually free itself up to be scary. The ending of a more traditional movie would probably be the ending of our first act.

    Watch the trailer:Man, Tom Cruise really loves those plane stunt scenes — “Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation,” “Edge of Tomorrow,” “Top Gun” — he may even love them as much as his running shots.

    “The Mummy” is scheduled for release June 9, 2017.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Why Marlene King Shot Down ABC Family’s ‘Now and Then’ TV Series

    Everything ’80s or ’90s seems to be getting a reboot nowadays, for better or worse, and the 1995 coming-of-age movie “Pretty Little Liars” boss Marlene King wrote the movie, which starred Christina Ricci, Thora Birch, Gaby Hoffmann and Ashleigh Aston Moore in the 1970s-set “Then” roles, and Rosie O’Donnell, Demi Moore, Rita Wilson, and Melanie Griffith in the “Now” section.

    Marlene talked to Entertainment Weekly about the making of the film, including how Leonardo DiCaprio was originally cast in the Vietnam vet role that went to Brendan Fraser — and discussed what went wrong with the TV series that was in development at one point.

    Here’s what she had to say about that:

    Yes, we talked about that. It was on ABC Family but they wanted to change it so the “now” was present day and the “then” would be the ’90s. I didn’t want to do that — I felt that kind of ruins how special the movie is. The movie still is so special to so many people, I didn’t want to take a chance on changing the time period. To me, there will never be a 1970s again, so to try to set it in the ’90s when we had cell phones and things like that, I don’t think it would work.

    EW asked if Marlene thought about where the characters would be now, if she did return to the “Now and Then” world.

    I thought about it a lot when we were starting to do the TV show. I’d love to see them four years later when they’re 16, and where they would be as teen girls during the second most important year – 12, that’s coming of age, and 16, that’s like when you’re starting to date and see the world in that way. I’d love to explore that.

    It sounds like she’s happy to revisit these characters, she just wants it to stay in the ’70s, or at least in a world before texting and the Internet and all that. As she put it:

    It was before cell phones – like the girls communicating with flashlights out their windows, and the rope and the string. Now you would just text your friend; there’s no romanticism to that. It was a very special time to grow up. And there’s a hint of how the world is changing when the girls meet the Vietnam vet played by Brendan Fraser on the road, and they think that everything is all hunky-dory but he sort of opens the window to the fact that things are changing. And I think that’s something that’s still a great era for people to look back at. And great music, too.

    Do you think “Now and Then” would be good to revisit as a TV series? If so, should they stick to the ’70s for the “then” part or would it be all right for ’90s kids to relive their own childhoods? ABC Family is definitely aiming young (see their whole name change) so we can’t see them ever focusing on the ’70s, but maybe another network would pick up the idea.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-331149%