Tag: bourne

  • ‘Bourne’ Series ‘Treadstone’ Casts Jeremy Irvine, Brian J. Smith

    ‘Bourne’ Series ‘Treadstone’ Casts Jeremy Irvine, Brian J. Smith

    Roadside Attractions

    The upcoming “Bourne” spinoff TV series “Treadstone” has found its two of its leads.

    Jeremy Irvine (“War Horse,” “Mamma Mia 2”) and Brian J. Smith (“Sense8”) have joined the cast of the USA series, which is inspired by the series of Matt Damon films (and Robert Ludlum novels). Here’s the “Treadstone” breakdown, per Deadline:

    ‘Treadstone’ explores the origin story and present-day actions of a CIA black ops program known as Operation Treadstone — a covert program that uses behavior-modification protocol to turn recruits into nearly superhuman assassins. The first season follows sleeper agents across the globe as they’re mysteriously “awakened” to resume their deadly missions.

    Irvive will be playing J. Randolph Bentley, a spy dispatched by the CIA to eliminate a key target, but ends up embroiled in an international conspiracy. Smith is starring as Doug McKenna, an all-American oil-rig worker whose life changes after he discovers long buried truths about himself.

    USA picked up the show with a straight-to-series order earlier this summer. “Treadstone,” created by “Heroes” mastermind Tim Kring, is set to begin production sometime in 2019. No word yet on a premiere date.

    [via: Deadline]

  • Producer Frank Marshall Teases Next ‘Bourne’ Movie, ‘Jurassic World 2,’ and ‘Indiana Jones 5’

    Frank Marshall knows how to turn films into franchises as effectively as Jason Bourne knows how to turn the contents of any given room into deadly weapons.

    With over four decades of producing films to his credit, Marshall occupies a rarefied status in Hollywood thanks to his role in shepherding mega-hit franchises to the big screen — a blockbuster list that includes all four (and counting) Indiana Jones movies, the “Back to the Future” trilogy, two “Gremlins” films, the modern “Jurassic World” series and, of course, the Jason Bourne franchise, not to mention his storied and ongoing association with Steven Spielberg across many of that filmmaker’s iconic canon, as well as career high-water marks like “Paper Moon,” “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?,” “The Sixth Sense,” “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” and, most recently, “Sully.”

    With “Jason Bourne,” the latest entry in the Bourne filmography, now available on DVD and Blu-ray, Marshall joined Moviefone to discuss the philosophies behind bringing Rubert Ludlum’s reluctant operative back to the multiplex, updates on his future installments in the Indy and Jurassic franchises, making a move to the small screen in the age of peak TV, and even making a bid for applause on Broadway with a forthcoming musical using the margarita-soaked melodies of his longtime friend, Jimmy Buffett.

    Moviefone: What are you thinking, big picture, now that you know that audiences are still hungry for “Jason Bourne,” seeing how the film performed all over the world. Where are you guys now in your thinking process?

    Frank Marshall: We’re still in the infant stages of discussing what we’re going to do next, but certainly, I think we took the opportunity here to give ourselves a lot of options at the end of his one, to expand the world. We have several new characters that are operating, both in the world of the CIA, but also in the world outside, and big business, and cyberspace. So I think we want to stay current, but we’re probably going to look to expand the world.

    When it came time to return to “Bourne,” you obviously have a wealth of experience building out and sustaining franchises, but what was the biggest challenge that you faced, in particular, on this one to make sure that the franchise was going to go forward successfully?

    The big challenge that we have is really how to keep the character of Bourne going, which is, how do we get him back into the fray? Certainly, he was living, when the movie opens, he’s just still trying to find himself and find a life that he can live, even though he’s tormented by his past. So it’s always that question of how do you get him back? So we thought that the cyber warfare that’s going on now was a good reason to tap into that again, and then with the idea of Nicky being the conduit to get him back into the fray.

    Do you have a list — whether it’s mental or actually written down — of what a “Bourne” movie is: the ingredients that a “Bourne” movie should always have and the things that it should maybe avoid going into? Is there a master template for making a “Bourne” movie?

    Well, no. There’s a couple of elements or ingredients that we always look towards. One is the realism and the grittiness of the movie. We do like to go to real locations and not just either CG them or fake them. Again, on this movie we were in five or six different countries, as we were on all the rest. We also, we have this element of a flashback where Bourne flashes back on previous things to help us tell his story.

    One of our signature elements are the fights that Bourne has and using everyday objects to figure out things. There are a few of those elements that we always look for. Plus, I think you can look back on all of the movies and say we’ve had extraordinary supporting characters in the movie, wonderful actors and actresses that give it that signature feel. It’s not just the same characters in every movie, like they do with “Bond,” but they’re different, new characters, for example Riz Ahmed, Alicia Vikander, and Tommy Lee Jones in this one.

    It would be easy to underestimate Matt Damon‘s contribution because the character is so minimalist, but I want to hear from you why Matt is so integral to the success of the “Bourne” franchise.

    I think he’s the perfect spy. He looks like your college roommate, and he doesn’t look like he can hurt anybody, and he’s very empathetic. So the audience is really sympathized with his place where he doesn’t know who he is. I think that’s a really cool problem that they want to see him try and solve, even though they think that he’s this nice guy, but he’s actually an assassin. That’s a conflict they want to see him work out. But he’s just this wonderful actor and, as you said, he doesn’t have a lot of lines. So he has to do it in his actions and the way he behaves.

    What has it meant for you, throughout your career, to be able to take characters like Jason Bourne, who existed on the page, and like Indiana Jones, which was a cinematic creation, and have made a good run at creating and shepherding characters that are going to exist in the pop culture imagination for decades to come, like James Bond and Sherlock Holmes and Tarzan. What has that accomplishment meant to you?

    I’m a storyteller. I love telling stories. Certainly, the fact that these characters are enduring, and keep on going, and people love them is a great feeling because I think, as you get to know them, they become like security blankets. When you’re flipping to the channels, and there’s Jason Bourne in “Bourne Supremacy,” you want to watch him. So it’s nice to have been able to be a part of creating these characters and making them feel comfortable for people.

    You’ve certainly had a tremendous impact on today’s filmmakers from your amazing body of work with all of the different filmmakers you’ve worked with. Give me a sense of how you feel about that, when people tell you how much certain movies that you made have meant to them and have influenced them, professionally and creatively.

    My first reaction is it makes me feel old! But I don’t feel old — I feel young. I feel like I was when I was making those movies. It’s a thrill because we love making movies. I always have, and to have it as entertainment, and to have the audience or people say that they appreciate the movies that I’ve made is a great feeling because that’s the ultimate compliment. That’s why I do it. I’m an entertainer. So that’s a roundabout way of saying I love it.

    I know that you’re in the early stages of a new “Indiana Jones” movie. Can you give me a sense of where you are in the development process right now?

    Just the early stages. David Koepp is our screenwriter and we’re all talking, but there’s really nothing down on paper yet.

    What has you creatively excited about returning to that character?

    Again, it’s just the team. It’s a wonderful team like we had on “Bourne.” It’s nice to have your friends that you’ve known. Look, I’ve known Harrison [Ford] and obviously Steven {Spielberg] and the whole group for 30 years now. So it’s nice to have everybody back together as kind of a reunion.

    Are you intrigued to see how Harrison rises to the challenge of reprising that role and the physicality of it at this stage of his career?

    Listen, I watched him in “Star Wars [The Force Awakens],” and I don’t think he’s going to have any problem!

    Probably a little further along in development is the next “Jurassic World” film. Give me a sense of where you are with that.

    I’m excited about that one. We’re much further along. Actually, we start shooting in February in London. But I’m excited by the filmmaker, Juan Antonio Bayona, and what his take on the franchise and on the world of “Jurassic” is going to be. He’s an exciting young filmmaker, and a lot like Colin Trevorrow was, he’s an extraordinary filmmaker, but also a fan. So it’s going to be nice to see what he comes up with.

    Do you have a sense of how he is continuing what Colin set up, and how he is making it his own?

    Well, yes. He’s very meticulous in his preparation and in his doing storyboards and pre-viz, and he’s a real shooter. If you’ve seen his other movies, you know that he has a dark side to him as well. So I’m kind of excited about what he’s going to bring to the franchise.

    You’ve got some projects headed to television. Can you talk to me about the TV projects that you’ve got lined up right now?

    Yeah, we’re developing a couple of things at CBS that we’re kind of excited about, and a couple of documentaries that we’re doing that are either going to be on cable or released and on something like Netflix or Amazon. So we’ve got a lot of things going.

    Do you have any of your film franchise properties that you’re interested in bringing to TV, either in a direct way or with a bit of a twist or a tie-in kind of a way?

    No, we talk about it all the time, because it’s just a nice new opportunity to tell a story in a different way. Was just, last night, [were] looking at “Goliath.” I don’t know if you’ve seen that, but there are some great new series, limited series, and series out there. So I think we might be looking at one or two, but I can’t talk about them yet.

    Obviously, you’ve had such a fruitful partnership with Steven Spielberg. As he continues forward in his career, what are the kinds of things that you’re looking for to keep him on the cutting edge as a filmmaker, the kind of material you’re trying to find for him and develop for him?

    Well, it’s pretty basic. We’re always just looking for a good story. Steven has eclectic tastes just like [Kathleen Kennedy] and I do. We made a lot of different movies in a lot of different genres. So I’m just always looking for a good story, and then, hopefully, if he likes it too, he’ll have a space in his schedule to try and do it. Our company is there at DreamWorks. So we’re talking all the time about new things.

    How have the demands of your wife, Kathy Kennedy, running Lucasfilm over the past few years affected your professional partnership, if at all? Are you two able to collaborate as closely as you prefer to, Or does she have her hands full with the Lucasfilm properties?

    No, we’ve had to sort of separate ourselves on the business front. She runs Lucasfilm, and I now run Kennedy/Marshall, but obviously we still talk about things, and we recommend things to each other, and it’s the same but different.

    What are the goal posts that you still have in your career, the things that keep you getting up and going to work with a smile on your face?

    I love the process of this. I branched out now, as the Kennedy/Marshall company makes a lot of documentaries which I’m very excited about, telling real stories. It’s different than my day job where I know exactly what I’m doing every day on a movie. But on a documentary, you don’t know what could happen every day, and it can do a 90-degree turn like we had on “The Armstrong Lie.” So I’m excited about the documentaries we’re doing.

    I’m also dipping my toe into Broadway. I’m producing a musical based on Jimmy Buffett’s music called “Escape to Margaritaville,” which will open at the La Jolla Playhouse in May, and then hopefully go across the country and end up on the East Coast somewhere.

    That was a project I definitely wanted to ask you about. Tell me about that collaboration with Jimmy Buffett. How did this come about, and what are you hoping to accomplish with it?

    We’ve sort of been dabbling in each other’s worlds for many, many years, and love working together. There was an idea tossed around about how we would take his songs — I think they call them a “jukebox musical” — and put them into a story that really reflects his lifestyle and his world. A couple of years ago we got a couple of other people who are in the Broadway world that thought that this was a good idea, and we started working together.

    It’s really the tone of something like “Mamma Mia!” or “Jersey Boys,” where we have all the hit songs but they’re woven into a story. It is a time when audiences want to forget about the real world and go have a good time, and this is what this musical is going to be — certainly the world that Jimmy lives in. So it’s been really fun, and it’s happening!

  • Here’s Why ‘Jason Bourne’ Is Both a Box-Office Hit and a Disappointment

    Remember what we noted last week about sequel fatigue? The seemingly strong return of the “Bourne” franchise with “Jason Bourne” doesn’t disprove that. Indeed, it might have done even better if it didn’t have to compete for women’s attention against a non-sequel comedy, “Bad Moms.”

    “Jason Bourne” opened near the higher end of expectations with an estimated $60.0 million. That’s better than a lot of live-action sequels this year, which have struggled to open above $50 million. It also outdid many of this year’s sequels in that it opened with bigger numbers than the last installment, 2012’s “The Bourne Legacy,” which debuted with $38.1 million.

    Then again, that film starred Jeremy Renner and was directed by Tony Gilroy, attempting to make the franchise work without mainstays Matt Damon and Paul Greengrass. This year, we’ve seen over and over what happens when sequels lose one or more major players: you get box office disappointments like “The Huntsman: Winter’s War,” “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” or “Independence Day: Resurgence.”
    It’s clear that the main reason for the new “Bourne’s” robust premiere is the return of Damon and Greengrass for the first time since 2007’s “The Bourne Ultimatum.” As a result, “Bourne” earned a healthy A- at CinemaScore, indicating strong word-of-mouth from ticketbuyers.

    Even so, “Ultimatum” opened nearly $10 million higher, with $69.3 million — playing on nearly 400 fewer screens than “Bourne” and at ticket prices 20 percent lower than today’s. If you view “Jason Bourne” as the nine-years-in-the-making follow-up to “Bourne Ultimatum” (since I guess we’re all supposed to pretend “Legacy” didn’t happen), then it actually does fit the sequel-fatigue pattern we’ve seen all year.

    One possible reason more moviegoers didn’t feel the “Bourne” is that it didn’t have the appeal to both sexes that everyone assumed it did. Sure, it’s the fifth installment in a popular action franchise, and “The Martian” star Damon is beloved by men and women alike. And yet, according to studio exit polling, the “Bourne” audience this weekend was only 45 percent female.

    Where did the women go? Maybe to “Bad Moms,” which premiered in third place with an estimated $23.4 million, just a hair behind the second-week returns for “Star Trek Beyond” (an estimated $24.0 million). That’s a good number for a film that cost only a reported $20 million to make. While it was marketed as something of a gender-switched version of “The Hangover,” “Moms” was still an original comedy, not subject to sequel fatigue.
    BAD MOMSIndeed, ever since “Bridesmaids,” Hollywood always seems surprised to discover there’s an audience for a female-driven ensemble comedy. Nonetheless, “Moms” enjoyed a bigger debut than any R-rated comedy in the past 13 months, save for Melissa McCarthy‘s “The Boss” and Amy Schumer‘s “Trainwreck.”

    The movie earned the best reviews of the week among wide releases (63 percent fresh at Rotten Tomatoes) and the best customer word-of-mouth (an A at CinemaScore). Even with fellow all-gal comedy “Ghostbusters” still in the top 10 (in its third weekend, the reboot came in at No. 7 with an estimated $9.8 million), “Moms” was still able to draw plenty of women to the multiplex.

    Also drawing women was another new, original movie, thriller “Scream Queens” star Emma Roberts and strong word-of-mouth (an A- CinemaScore) stemming from the film’s mid-week opening, “Nerve” enjoyed an estimated $9.0 million debut (coming in eighth, a shade behind “Ghostbusters”), for a total of $15.1 million since it premiered on Wednesday.
    Meanwhile, “Lights Out,” an original movie starring Teresa Palmer, continued to do well. In its second weekend, it came in fifth with an estimated $10.8 million. Horror movies, of course, tend to sell more tickets to women. Indeed, if you look at the whole top 10 this weekend, including “Bad Moms,” “Lights Out,” “Ghostbusters,” “Nerve,” and “The Legend of Tarzan” (starring Alexander Skarsgård‘s abs), at least five of the ten movies have strong appeal to women, and three of those are original stories.

    None of this is going to stop Hollywood from churning out more “Jason Bourne”-type action movies that appeal primarily to men and draw upon familiar titles and performers. As expensive as “Bourne” was to make (a reported $120 million, or about six times as much as “Bad Moms”), it will most likely earn more than “Bad Moms,” “Nerve,” and “Lights Out” put together.

    Still, this week’s results suggest that there are only so many times a franchise can return to the well before it runs dry, and that the studios ignore female audiences and original storytelling at their peril.

  • Matt Damon Drops Details on New ‘Bourne’ Movie Plot

    Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Adaptive Studios And HBO Present The Project Greenlight Season 4 Winning Film "The Leisure Class"Matt Damon will once again suit up as spy Jason Bourne for another flick about the character, and now, he’s spilling some secrets about the film’s plot, too.

    Of course, Damon didn’t get into any specifics in an interview with the New York Daily News, but the actor did reveal some of the motivations behind his character’s actions — and the flick’s plot — that fuel this new movie.

    “[Bourne] has his memory back, but that doesn’t mean he knows everything,” Damon told NYDN. “It’s 12 years since Jason Bourne has been on the grid. So we have to answer the questions, Where’s he been? What’s he doing? What gets him going again? So once we solved all that, then we had a movie.”

    It’s all pretty vague, and not much to go on, but still, it’s exciting to hear Damon talk about the franchise again, after stepping down from the series to make way for Jeremy Renner‘s “The Bourne Legacy” in 2012. One concrete detail Damon dropped, however, is that the flick will focus on the fallout of a “post-Snowden” society, so we expect data mining, government surveillance, and personal privacy concerns to all play some part in the new “Bourne“‘s plot.

    The as-yet-untitled fifth “Bourne” flick is due out on July 29, 2016.

    [via: New York Daily News]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-308300%

  • Buff Matt Damon Goes Shirtless in First ‘Bourne’ 2016 Photo

    He’s pale. He’s ripped. He’s shirtless. He’s Bourne. And he’s back! Matt Damon looks like he’s spoiling for a fight in the first photo shared from the set of the “Bourne” movie coming in 2016. It’s a behind-the-scenes photo, not an official movie still, and it was shared by producer Frank Marshall on September 8.

    Here it is:


    This as-yet-untitled “Bourne” movie (sometimes called “Bourne 5”) reunites Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass, whose last collaboration was “The Bourne Ultimatum,” the third in Damon’s Bourne series, in 2007. After that, Jeremy Renner stepped into the franchise with 2012’s “The Bourne Legacy.” This new movie will also bring back Julia Stiles as Nicky Parsons, with fresh faces including Alicia Vikander, Tommy Lee Jones, and Vincent Cassel. At the end of August, Matt Damon had mentioned that the Bourne movie would start production the following week. He described the plot to Buzzfeed as “Bourne through an austerity-riddled Europe and in a post-Snowden world.”

    The latest “Bourne” sequel is currently scheduled to open July 29, 2016.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

    %Slideshow-295732%

  • First Photo of Matt Damon on New ‘Bourne’ Movie Set

    Matt Damon on set of new "Bourne" film
    Matt Damon on set of new “Bourne” film

    Matt Damon’s back — even if his shirt is not.

    In this photo posted on Twitter by producer Frank Marshall, the actor strips down for what looks like a fight scene on the first day of filming the new “Bourne” film.

    Although much about the movie remains under wraps, Damon resumes the titular role he last played eight years ago in “The Bourne Ultimatum” before handing off to Jeremy Renner.

    Julia Stiles also returns, joining Alicia Vikander from “The Man From U.N.C.L.E.”, Vincent Cassell and Tommy Lee Jones.

    “Without giving too much of it away, it’s Bourne through an austerity-riddled Europe and in a post-Snowden world,” Damon tells Buzzfeed.It seems like enough has changed, you know? There are all these kinds of arguments about spying and civil liberties and the nature of democracy.”

    The movie’s due out in July 2016.

    20077781
  • Tommy Lee Jones Joins the New ‘Bourne’ Sequel

    AFI FEST 2014 Presented By Audi Gala Screening Of "The Homesman" - Red CarpetOscar winner Tommy Lee Jones has joined the upcoming “Bourne” sequel, according to a new report.

    Variety writes that Jones is set to play a high-ranking CIA officer in the flick, which will reunite titular star Matt Damon with the hit action franchise. Damon last appeared in “The Bourne Ultimatum” in 2007, then turned the franchise over to Jeremy Renner in 2012 reboot “The Bourne Legacy.”

    Jones has plenty of experience in the action and thriller genres (his Academy Award-winning role in “The Fugitive” is just one of many shining examples), so he should fit in nicely with the “Bourne” crew, which also includes the returning Julia Stiles (like Damon, she starred in the first three flicks) and Alicia Vikander. Paul Greengrass, who helmed “The Bourne Supremacy” and “Ultimatum,” is also on board for the new flick.

    Variety reports that production on the new sequel — which is still untitled — is expected to begin this summer. The film is due out on July 29, 2016.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: Getty Images for AFI

    %Slideshow-181631%

  • Julia Stiles Joins Matt Damon for New ‘Bourne’ Movie in 2016

    Yes! Cue another round of Moby’s “Extreme Ways” ’cause Jason Bourne is back — and he’s bringing an old friend with him. According to Deadline, Matt Damon is not only back as Bourne for his fourth movie (the third with director Paul Greengrass) but Julia Stiles is confirmed to return as Nicky Parsons. They are the only official cast members so far, although Deadline said Alicia Vikander was being sought for a major role and Variety said Viggo Mortensen may or may not play an assassin. Deadline also said — and we agree — that they hoped Joan Allen would return as Pam Landy.

    The first movie, “The Bourne Identity” came out in 2002, followed by more Damon dominance in 2004’s “The Bourne Supremacy.” Damon returned again for “The Bourne Ultimatum” in 2007, but then the focus shifted to Jeremy Renner’s Aaron Cross in “The Bourne Legacy.” That one was directed by Tony Gilroy and it only kinda sorta counts because it didn’t feature Matt Damon. So this new movie will go back to basics.

    Back in November, Matt previewed the new movie to E! News: “It’ll be in 2016 when the movie will actually come out. Paul Greengrass is going to do another one and that’s all I ever said. I just needed him to say yes.” According to Variety, the movie is scheduled to open July 29, 2016.

    So far this new project is just being called Universal Pictures’ Untitled Next Bourne Chapter, but expect it to end up with a title like “The Bourne Resurgence” or maybe “Bourne Ready,” which feels inevitable. Maybe suggest your own title now, while you can?

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-297539%

  • Matt Damon’s ‘Bourne’ Sequel Gets New Release Date

    bourne identity
    Matt Damon‘s return to the “Bourne” series was much-touted and has been long-awaited, but fans of the franchise are going to have to wait a little bit longer before they can see the titular spy back in action.

    The still-untitled sequel has been pushed back two weeks from its original release date. The flick was set to debut on July 15, 2016; now, it will premiere on July 29, 2016.

    No reason for the change was announced, though Variety suspects the film wants to avoid competition with the third “Star Trek” flick, which is set to debut the weekend before the new “Bourne”‘s original release date. Now, it will also premiere one week ahead of DC’s “Suicide Squad.”

    Paul Greengrass is also returning to the “Bourne” series for the hotly-anticipated flick.

    [via: Variety]

    Photo credit: Jean Cummings/J Johnson/Universal/J Cummings

    %Slideshow-161294%