Tag: annabelle-creation

  • Movie Review: ‘Until Dawn’

    (L to R) Odessa A’zion, Belmont Cameli, Ella Rubin, Michael Cimino and Ji-young Yoo star in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Sony Pictures. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Odessa A’zion, Belmont Cameli, Ella Rubin, Michael Cimino and Ji-young Yoo star in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Sony Pictures. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    ‘Until Dawn’ receives 5.5 out of 10 stars.

    Opening in theaters April 25 is ‘Until Dawn,’ directed by David F. Sandberg and starring Ella Rubin, Michael Cimino, Odessa A’zion, Ji-young Yoo, Belmont Cameli, Maia Mitchell, and Peter Stormare.

    Related Article: Movie Review: ‘Shazam! Fury of the Gods’

    Initial Thoughts

    Ella Rubin stars in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    Ella Rubin stars in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    As far as generic horror entries go, ‘Until Dawn’ is…all right. Directed by David F. Sandberg (who helmed the horror outings ‘Lights Out’ and ‘Annabelle: Creation’ before going down the superhero rabbit hole with two ‘Shazam!’ films) and written by Blair Butler and Gary Dauberman (the latter having penned all three ‘Annabelle’ films and the recent adaptation of ‘Salem’s Lot,’ which he also directed), the movie is based on a 2015 survival horror game released for PlayStation. Except that – in the time-honored tradition of how Hollywood has treated most video games – the game’s story has been thrown out entirely in favor of an all-original tale loosely set in the game’s world.

    Gamers may (rightly) complain about the disrespect (although it didn’t much hurt ‘A Minecraft Movie,’ did it?), but this version of ‘Until Dawn’ still has to succeed as a horror movie. It’s entertaining in a superficial way — and repetitive in the way that games can be — but it ultimately succumbs to its own thin nature and the lack of real stakes. While the game took inspiration from slasher movies and some other horror classics, the movie goes all-out in its homages to the genre to the point of distraction. What Sandberg and Dauberman, who certainly know their genre, might have intended as a celebration of horror ends up being a warmed-over pastiche.

    Story and Direction

    Director David Sandberg on the set of 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    Director David Sandberg on the set of ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    It’s been a year since Clover’s (Ella Rubin) sister Melanie (Maia Mitchell) took off for parts unknown following the death of their mother, and now Clover is convinced that something is amiss. Along with four friends – ex Max (Michael Cimino), bestie Megan (Ji-young Yoo), and lovers Nina (Odessa A’zion) and Abe (Belmont Cameli) – she tracks her sibling as far as a remote area named Glore Valley, where it turns out that there have been a number of strange disappearances.

    And that’s the least of it. The gang of five drive through pouring rain into the valley, only to emerge at the area’s Welcome Center – with the rain still cascading around the little patch of dry land that the center sits on. Plus this has to be the most inhospitable welcome center of all time, as Clover and the others are soon stalked and brutally dispatched once night falls by a masked figure wielding a pickaxe – only, to their surprise, to wake up again at the same point earlier in the day at which they arrived in the valley.

    As this goes on, the group is viciously murdered again and again – by the slasher, by poisoned water that makes them explode, and by other gruesome and painful means – only to do it again the next day. It becomes apparent that they’re caught in some kind of time loop and can only die a certain amount of times. And each time the cycle starts anew, there are more buildings, more monsters, and more ways to get killed – with the only clue about how to escape coming from an apparition in the form of a witch: “Either survive the night or become part of it.”

    As mentioned earlier, the plot of ‘Until Dawn’ the movie has little to do with the game, save for some references to a mine collapse and a handful of Easter eggs regarding the main characters of the game and the actors who voice them. Instead, the movie utilizes every horror trope it can get its claws on: a masked slasher, a witch in an old house, a buried town, evil dolls, demonic possession, flesh-eating ghouls (here called wendigos, another nod to the game, although they’re not like any wendigo we’ve ever read about), and even a giant monster stomping around the woods (more like the wendigo we know).

    (L to R) Ella Rubin, Michael Cimino, Belmont Cameli, Odessa A’zion star in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Ella Rubin, Michael Cimino, Belmont Cameli, Odessa A’zion star in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    Equally comprehensive is the list of movies that ‘Until Dawn’ pulls from: ‘The Texas Chain Saw Massacre,’ ‘Friday the 13th,’ the first two ‘Evil Dead’ movies, ‘Poltergeist,’ ‘The Descent,’ ‘The Blair Witch Project,’ ‘My Bloody Valentine’…the references go on and on. Eventually it all gets explained (by Peter Stormare, playing a version of the character he voiced in the game), although the reason why all this is happening seems somewhat vague and underwhelming after 90 minutes of watching the kids get mutilated, mangled, and mauled in every way possible.

    The gore effects, to be sure, are vivid and plentiful, a nice throwback to the hard-R rated cinematic abattoirs of the 1970s and ’80s. They’re fun to watch in the moment, channeling fleeting sensations of the giddy vibe that accompanied watching such outrageous effects decades ago. But the film can’t really rise above the nostalgia it invokes: an attempt to suggest that the ghastly events occurring in Glore Valley are a manifestation of Clover’s fear and grief rings hollow, since why would she manifest those as flesh-eating monsters?

    Sandberg does wring some nicely atmospheric moments out of the premise early in the film, but once we get past the initial revelation of the time loop, the script just goes in circles itself, the crew adding a little more knowledge to their skimpy arsenal every time they respawn…kind of like a video game.

    Cast and Performances 

    (L to R) Peter Stormare and Ella Rubin star in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Peter Stormare and Ella Rubin star in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    Not much to work with here, really. This is sort of a classic ensemble of fairly unmemorable teens/twenty-somethings who are held back by flatly drawn characters and in some cases, their own relative lack of experience. The actor who probably comes off the best is Odessa A’zion, who was stuck in another woeful horror retread a few years back (Hulu’s ‘Hellraiser’), but can muster up some presence, charm, and inner strength (see her performance in the excellent ‘Fresh Kills’), earning her the most cheer-worthy moments.

    No one here is bad, and the cast shows considerable commitment to the often physically demanding story, with all them dragged, beaten, stabbed, blown up, violently poisoned, and generally roughed up throughout the movie. But lead Ella Rubin doesn’t do much in particular to distinguish herself from plenty of similar characters, and the male leads are handsome but bland. The only other actor in the movie is, of course, the always offbeat Stormare, who can do this kind of thing in his sleep and makes a meal out of saying the name “Clover.”

    Final Thoughts

    Odessa A’zion stars in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    Odessa A’zion stars in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    ‘Until Dawn’ is slickly made, with some nice production design elements and a few spooky moments. Aficionados of the games may be very disappointed with the lack of real connection to the source material. When they’re on their game (no pun intended), both Sandberg and Dauberman can bring the horror goods (the former’s ‘Lights Out’ and the latter’s ‘Annabelle Comes Home’ are both underrated). There’s no question that ‘Until Dawn’ is programmed to be a crowd-pleaser – the film keeps piling on the effects and gore with increasing intensity.

    However, it’s all in the service of characters and a story that are not so much flimsy as just a string of sequences meant to unearth memories of other, better movies. Genre fans might have fun picking out all the references even as they get tired of the circular narrative beats, but it only exacerbates the perception that the filmmakers have no original ideas of their own, or even interesting takes on the genre tropes they’re supposedly celebrating. If you can survive that to the end credits – never mind dawn – you might enjoy yourself.

    iaELISL856IVy4ROnn07k1

    What is the plot of ‘Until Dawn’?

    Clover (Ella Rubin) and four of her friends travel to a remote valley in search of her missing sister, only for the group to find themselves trapped in a nightmare in which all of them are killed by a vicious murderer each night – only to wake up and relive the horror again unless they can survive until dawn.

    Who is in the cast of ‘Until Dawn’?

    • Ella Rubin as Clover
    • Michael Cimino as Max
    • Odessa A’zion as Nina
    • Ji-young Yoo as Megan
    • Belmont Cameli as Abe
    • Maia Mitchell as Melanie
    • Peter Stormare as Dr. Hill
    The hourglass resets each night in 'Until Dawn'. Photo: Sony Pictures. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    The hourglass resets each night in ‘Until Dawn’. Photo: Sony Pictures. Photo: Kerry Brown. © 2024 Screen Gems, Inc. and TSG Entertainment II LLC. All Rights Reserved.

    List of David F. Sandberg Movies:

    Buy Tickets: ‘Until Dawn’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy David F. Sandberg Movies on Amazon

    gB3RkrMn
  • Ranking ‘The Conjuring’ Universe Movies

    Ranking ‘The Conjuring’ Universe Movies

  • Here’s Why ‘Annabelle: Creation’ Is the Summer’s Last Box Office Hit

    Hollywood got two truly terrifying frights this weekend. One came from horror spinoff “Annabelle: Creation,” which scared up an estimated $35.0 million in ticket sales to top the box office chart. The other fright was from the chart as a whole, which marked this as the lowest-grossing weekend of an already dismal summer.

    “Annabelle,” the fourth movie in the successful “Conjuring” franchise, performed as well as pundits had predicted. But its chief rival, cartoon sequel “The Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature,” opened in third place with only an estimated $8.9 million, underperforming even the most pessimistic predictions. This despite the fact that there hasn’t been an animated hit in months, that kids are still out of school, and that “Nut Job 2” opened on 4,003 screens to become one of the widest independent releases of all time.

    And then there’s wannabe awards hopeful “The Glass Castle,” which opened way down in ninth place with an estimated $4.9 million. That’s just a tad below predictions, and since it only opened on 1,461 screens, that makes for an okay $3,337 per theater. (“Nut Job 2” earned just $2,232 per screen.) Still, it’s pretty weak for a drama that hopes to last long enough to ride into the fall season as an Oscar banner-waver.

    How did “Annabelle” manage to pull fans into theaters during a dog-days summer season? Here are some of the factors behind this weekend’s good-news-bad-news box office.

    Hollywood tends to ignore women audience members at the box office, but at least half of this weekend’s top 10 movies feature female stars — or predominantly female casts — and cater to majority-female audiences. These include “Annabelle” (horror movies tend to draw more women than men), comedy “Girls Trip,” Halle Berry thriller “Kidnap,” “Glass Castle” (an adaptation of Jeannette Walls’ best-selling memoir of her Dickensian childhood), and Charlize Theron spy thriller “Atomic Blonde.” There’s also “Nut Job 2,” whose audience turned out to be 57 percent female.

    Since “Annabelle” was always going to be the strongest draw of these films, it may have drawn much of the female audience that might otherwise have made hits out of the other new releases — and already has, to varying degrees, for holdovers “Girls Trip,” “Kidnap,” and “Atomic Blonde.”
    “Glass Castle” was always going to skew older; it’s a period piece for a literary audience, one that probably read Walls’ book back in 2005 when she published it. Surprisingly, “Annabelle” skewed older as well, drawing 54 percent of its viewers from the 25-and-over crowd. Even more surprising was that half of the “Nut Job 2” viewers were over 18, which suggests that the audience contained as many parents as kids.

    Reviews, once again, continue to dictate in part box office spending. Critics were unusually kind to “Annabelle,” giving it a 69 percent “Fresh” at Rotten Tomatoes. Then again, distributor New Line went out of its way to cultivate their good will. Most horror distributors ignore critics, figuring that they can either avoid screening the film for reviewers or just pay no mind to the reviews because horror fans usually don’t care what the critics think.
    New Line, however, actually booked “Annabelle” in film festivals to get positive early buzz among a handful of critics, which then spread among their colleagues. That, in turn, could explain why older moviegoers came out for this one, since they actually do still read reviews.

    The paradox is that the critics actually liked “Annabelle” better than paying customers, who gave the horror prequel a meh B grade at CinemaScore once they saw it, after being lured to the theater by strong buzz. “Nut Job 2” actually got a better CinemaScore grade (B+), and that’s still pretty bad for an animated movie. (Critics gave “Nut Job 2” just a “Rotten” 12 percent at Rotten Tomatoes.)

    “Glass Castle” may have been trolling for awards, with its prestige source material and prestige cast, led by recent Oscar-winner Brie Larson. But its reviews have been middling, just 49 percent fresh at RT. After a summer of Hollywood complaints about how low RT scores are driving customers away, here at last is some proof. An awards-hopeful drama seeking an audience of older viewers really does depend on critics’ good will in order to succeed at the box office, and “Glass Castle” didn’t have it.

    Just as it’s hard to be a female-targeted movie at a time when there’s a glut, it’s also good to be the first acclaimed horror movie in a summer that’s barely seen any horror releases at all. And it’s not good to be a poorly-reviewed cartoon two weeks after another disappointing cartoon (“The Emoji Movie“) left audiences feeling burned.
    It’s also hard to be an Oscar-seeking movie in August. Sure, “Glass Castle” pretty much has the field to itself right now; distributor Lionsgate may not have wanted it to compete against easier-sell prestige movies that tend to proliferate in the fall months. But it didn’t get the reviews it needed to succeed now, and it may peak too early in the awards conversation, to be superseded by newer, stronger films as the end of the year approaches. (“Dunkirk” took the same risk with its July release, but at least it’s cleaned up at the box office, with $153.7 million earned so far, which will help voters remember it later.)

    No one really expects much from the multiplex in mid-August. The hyped, would-be blockbusters have usually all come out by this time, and there’s not much to look forward to until after Labor Day. That’s why it was such a surprise this time last year when “Sausage Party” became a hit (it opened with $34.2 million, nearly as much as “Annabelle: Creation” this weekend).

    This weekend last year also saw the releases of “Pete’s Dragon” (a kid movie reboot that disappointed at the box office), “Florence Foster Jenkins” (a period biopic whose critical and commercial response were analogous to “Glass Castle,” though Meryl Streep‘s performance was still memorable enough to earn her an Oscar nomination), and “Hell or High Water” (another indie Oscar-hopeful that rode its strong reviews to a Best Picture nomination.) Still, despite the similarities, last August also had two big late-season hits: comic book film “Suicide Squad” and horror smash “Don’t Breathe.”

    Nothing like those films has opened (or is likely to open) this August. No wonder this weekend’s box office total of about $118.2 million is the lowest of the summer, and that the summer as a whole has come in about 10 percent below last summer’s take up to this point.

    Along with Rotten Tomatoes, that’s been Hollywood’s other scapegoat for poor summer sales. It certainly explains the lack of enthusiasm for “Nut Job 2,” whose 2014 predecessor wasn’t that beloved to begin with. Then again, new franchises (“The Dark Tower“), original-screenplay comedies and horror movies (“The House,” “Wish Upon“), and non-franchise prestige dramas (“Detroit“) haven’t done that well either. About the only movies that have done well this summer are superhero franchise movies.

    At least “Annabelle” proves that you don’t have to wear spandex to have a successful franchise. Sure, “Creation” has the lowest opening of the four, but they’ve all been in the same ballpark. (The highest was the original 2013 “Conjuring,” with $41.9 million, just $6.9 million more than “Creation.”)

    Worldwide, the franchise has earned a shocking $967 million after just four movies, making it the fourth biggest horror franchise of all time (after “Alien,” “The Mummy,” and “Resident Evil“). With more sequels and spinoffs on the way “Conjuring” will continue to be one of the few non-superhero franchises that doesn’t give studio executives nightmares.

  • Box Office: ‘Annabelle: Creation’ Conjuring $36 Million Domestic Debut

    LOS ANGELES (Variety.com) – “Annabelle: Creation” isn’t just fleshing out New Line Cinema’s self-proclaimed “Conjuring Universe,” it’s also helping to save the back half of the summer box office. The prequel to 2014’s “Annabelle” is conjuring up a $36 million domestic debut.

    According to estimates, Warner Bros.’ supernatural horror will easily win its opening weekend after taking in $15 million from 3,502 locations on Friday, including Thursday night previews. Talitha Bateman, Lulu Wilson, Stephanie Sigman, Miranda Otto, and Anthony LaPaglia star in the origin story behind the killer, antique doll from director David F. Sandberg.

    Also in the double digits for WB, “Dunkirk” continues to steamroll its blockbuster competition in second place. Despite being in its fourth frame, Christopher Nolan‘s World War II drama is expected to add just under $11 million to its total after making just over $3 million from 3,762 screens on Friday. That number is also expected to officially put “Dunkirk” over the $150 million marker domestically with $153 million.

    New entry “Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature” also managed to snag a spot in the top 3, despite only pulling off an $8 million heist. The sequel to 2014’s “The Nut Job” scored just shy of $3 million from 4,003 screens on Friday. Will Arnett, Maya Rudolph, Brendan Frasier, Katherine Heigl, Liam Neeson, and Jackie Chan lend their voices for the Open Road animation.

    Elsewhere, last week’s winner “The Dark Tower” falls from No. 1 to No. 4. It seems the negative word of mouth/press has halted Sony’s Stephen King adaptation in its second frame. After making just over $2 million from 3,451 locales on Friday, “The Dark Tower” is only expected to make $7.5 million this time around.

    Last but certainly not least, “Girls Trip” is still going strong. Universal’s Queen Latifah, Jada Pinkett Smith, Regina Hall, and Tiffany Haddish R-rated comedy took in another $2 million from just 2,303 venues on Friday. That number will translate to a solid $6 million fourth frame, bringing “Girls Trip” to a near-milestone — $96 million domestic.

    The Emoji Movie,” “Spider-Man: Homecoming,” “Kidnap,” new entry “The Glass Castle,” and “Atomic Blonde” round out the rest of the top 10.

  • David Sandberg on the Horror Inspiration Behind ‘Annabelle: Creation’

    For some people, dolls are just about the scariest thing they can imagine, more horrifying than clowns, werewolves, or clogged sinks. There’s something about their dead-eyed stare, porcelain skin, and uncanny valley-crossing realness that causes many a sleepless night. And there have certainly been enough horror movies to capitalize on this fear (most notably, the long-running “Child’s Play” franchise). For the newest generation though, cinema’s scariest doll is named Annabelle.

    Originally introduced in the first “Conjuring” film and based on a real-life Raggedy Ann doll that supernatural investigators The Warrens have in their museum of the occult, Annabelle has already starred in a spin-off (2014’s “Annabelle“) and is now back for a prequel to that film, set in the 1950s and delving deeper into the doll’s origins. “Annabelle: Creation” is a lot of fun. It’s also quite scary, taking the original film’s concept and adding some much-needed layers of thoughtfulness and characterization. Oh, and it even hints at where the next chapter of the “Conjuring” universe will be set.

    So it was a real thrill to get to talk to director David Sandberg, whose pervious film, “Lights Out,” occupied a similar place in the summer movie season last year, proving a much-needed relief from all the mega-budget histrionics and giving us all exactly what we need: a really good scare.

    In our conversation with the director (whose next film is the considerably more high-profile DC superhero flick “Shazam”) we talk about what it’s like extending the universe, if working with such young stars was a challenge, and what films inspired him.

    Moviefone: How did you first get involved in the project? Were you a fan of the “Conjuring” universe?

    David Sandberg: Yes, I was definitely a fan since the first film came out. I liked that it was more of a classic, old-school horror movie in many ways. How I got involved was I was finishing “Lights Out.” We were in post-production. We had tested the movie and the tests had been great and everybody was really happy with it. New Line and James Wan [who had made “Lights Out”] came to me to see if I wanted to do “Annabelle.”

    I was dying to do something with these guys again but at first I was like, Well, where are they going to take that? Is it going to be the first movie one more time? Does the doll come back and all that? Then they sent me the script and I was pleasantly surprised to see that it was a very different story. It’s such a different story that you don’t even have to have seen the first movie to enjoy it with it being a prequel with an all-new cast. I was totally on board.

    Was that part of the appeal, getting to begin this whole legend of the haunted doll?

    Yeah, and that it was a stand-alone story so, I could make it more my own. It gave me a little bit more freedom. And the fact that it was a period piece made it very appealing. Period movies lend themselves very well to horror.

    Obviously, you to add to the haunted doll trope, which is a classic staple of horror films.

    Yes.

    Was there anything that you were deliberately referencing?

    Not in terms of things happening in the movie. First of all, it’s a little bit of a challenge to take on, since the rules are that she can’t move, or that she can’t move around. So you have to come up with all of these things to get around it. We throw a sheet over her and have the sheet walking around. We figured we could have things happening around her and she’s sort of the center of evil. So that was a challenge. But a fun challenge.

    In terms of references, it was visual — a big reference was “The Haunting,” I love the CinemaScope cinematography in that movie. And in terms of sound, the biggest inspiration was “The Shining,” just because I think it’s one of the best horror scores ever. And it wasn’t even an original score, since they used a lot of music by Krzysztof Penderecki, a Polish composer. So I used all of his stuff for temp music, when we were putting the movie together. At first I thought, Oh I am going to miss this music so much when we take it out. But [composer] Benjamin [Wallfisch] did an amazing job channeling that same mood.

    I also got some “Devil’s Backbone” vibes.

    With the orphanage? Yeah. That may have been a subconscious reference. But I didn’t consciously reference it, although it is a great movie and I love the mood in that film.Were there specific rules you made up as to what could or couldn’t happen? There seems to be demons, possessions, all sorts of crazy things to keep track of.

    We were just trying to come up with things to do since the doll can’t do anything. Sometimes you come up with something and you cut it out because it’s too much. And some things were just like, Well maybe we can have the scarecrow come alive? It was just about thinking of fun things to come up with and if it’s too silly, we cut it out.

    Almost every scene has a young actor in it. Was it challenging in terms of working with these young girls who maybe don’t have as much experience?

    The only challenge was the hours. They can’t work after midnight and there are only so many hours they can work. There is no overtime. You have to get what you can get in that specific amount of time. Besides that they were amazing. They were super professional. We had pretty extensive casting period to find girls of this caliber. And it’s kind of funny because Talitha Bateman is the sister of Gabriel Bateman, who was in “Lights Out.” So I’d worked with her brother before. But it wasn’t one of those things where it’s like, “Yeah, I know your brother, you have the part.” She had to audition and come in again and again and really prove that she had what it took. And she did. She nailed it.

    Can you talk about your approach to the visuals in the film? I love the super-long shot, where one of the girls turns to the camera and says, “This goes on forever!”

    [Laughs] Yeah. That was actually a late addition. It was, like, a day or so before we were shooting them arriving at the house. We thought, Let’s do a long Steadicam shot when they arrive at the house. So I came in a couple of hours early and drew the diagram that said, Okay, this character walks up this and this character goes there. And we got it in 12 takes. That was it. I thought that this being a period piece and the “Conjuring” franchise feeling more classic and old-school, I wanted to shoot it like an older movie, where they have longer takes and it’s not your typical coverage but you plan out more staging and blocking of shots, which I find a lot more fun. The standard coverage gets so boring.

    There are also some fun transitions, too!

    Yeah! Like the transition into the well. Most of that was planned out in advance. There’s one transition that goes from night to day, where you see the house from the outside. That was something I came up with in the edit. It looks like the camera is in the exact same spot but it was actually one of those things where we found a shot during the night and a shot during the night and it’s almost in the same position so we had the VFX guys line them up so we could go from night to day.

    This movie is also super fun because it sets up another corner of the “Conjuring” universe, with the nun; there’s a photo of her and she maybe shows up for a minute. Was it fun to plant those seeds and did you talk to Wan about where it was going to go?

    Yeah, that was his idea. He wanted to have these references, now that it’s officially a universe, he wanted these things to tie it together.

    “Annabelle: Creation” haunts theaters everywhere Friday, August 11th.

  • Exclusive: ‘Shazam’ Director David Sandberg on ‘Getting to Know the Character’

    Earlier today, we talked to David Sandberg, the super talented Swedish filmmaker behind last year’s sleeper hit “Lights Out” and next week’s “Conjuring” spin-off, “Annabelle: Creation.” It was a lively chat that we’ll have up next week, but, while we were on the phone with Sandberg, we couldn’t help but ask about his next project, an adaptation of the DC comic book “Shazam.”

    We first asked if there was a specific tone that he was going for with the adaptation. (The character was created by writer Bill Parker and artist C.C. Beck way back in 1939.)

    “This will be very different than what I’ve done in the feature space, because it’s not a horror movie and it’s a much lighter tone. But it’s something that I look forward to trying out, even though I plan to return to horror in some fashion,” Sandberg explained. “My background, back in Sweden, before I started doing horror shorts, I was doing animated comedy shorts. It’s not totally alien to me to have more of a comedy approach. I look forward to taking that on in a feature.”

    We also asked if there was a particular run of the comics that he was drawing inspiration from. When we said how much we loved the miniseries from “Bone” creator Jeff Smith, Sandberg said he hadn’t read that one … yet. In fact, the character (and his rich background) is largely new to him.

    “It wasn’t a character I grew up with. It was published in Sweden, where I’m from, in the ’70s, so it’s a little before my time. So I only knew him from the Justice League,” Sandberg admitted. “It’s not until now that I’m getting into the comics and reading a lot of the old ones, the Geoff Johns ones, ‘The Power of Shazam,’ and looking at a bunch of animation. So I’m really getting to know the character.”

    Another item Sandberg confirmed: that this will be a New Line movie, not a Warner Bros. film. This suits the filmmaker just fine considering that both “Lights Out” and “Annabelle: Creation” were made for the studio. About New Line, the director said: “They’ve been awesome. I will keep making movies with them as long as they want me.”

    We’ll have more from our interview with Sandberg next week, ahead of the release of “Annabelle: Creation” on August 11th.