Tag: andy-samberg

  • ‘Storks’ Stars Andy Samberg & Katie Crown Finish Each Other’s Sentences On- and Off-Screen

    Among today’s animated films, “Storks” offers a very special delivery: rather than being isolated in recording booths on their own, the razor sharp voices behind the film’s characters frequently gathered together to riff off one another, and as Andy Samberg and Katie Crown make evident — they quickly began finishing each other’s sentences and building on every new punchline.

    Samberg — already a well-established comedy star with his digital shorts-launching tenure on “Saturday Night Live,” his sitcom “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” and his surrealistic mock-doc “7 Days in Hell” — plays Junior, the ambitious, top-performing stork at Cornerstone, which has replaces baby delivery with online shopping fulfillment.

    Crown — a prolific voice actress and animation writer known for her roles on “Total Drama,” “Stoked,” and “Bob’s Burgers” — is Tulip, a human teenager raised by the storks after a delivery mishap and, given her inherent klutziness, a calamitous fit within the hyper-efficient company. Together, they take on the task of delivering one unexpected infant to his proper parents before word of the baby’s accidental arrival unleashes all kinds of chaos.

    When the two actors joined Moviefone, it was easy to imagine the bubbling back-and-forth the two shared in the recording booth, especially when they reveal just how deep their animation love runs.

    Moviefone: One of the things I loved learning about this movie was that you guys actually weren’t stuck in booths by yourselves all the time. What was the freeing part about that, to be able to kind of bring your improv skills to play off of each other?

    Andy Samberg: Yeah I mean, the fact that that was really the process really shows when you watch the movie because there’s very human rhythms to it, even though I’m a stork.

    Katie Crown: Yeah, conversational.

    Samberg: Yeah. It feels a lot looser and a lot more real.

    Crown: It’s authentic. Like you get way more of an authentic feel when you watch it when you have that sort of freedom, you’re not stuck in some sort of booth by yourself.

    Samberg: And it’s different kind of comedy as well. There’s big set piece visual gags and hard punchline type stuff, but there’s also —

    Crown: — just us talking back and forth. When we’re like talking over each other, those are the single takes. There’s no editing in there because they can’t, because we’re overlapping so much. They can just use all those.

    Samberg: Yeah. It allows for our performance-based comedy as well.

    Crown: That’s the stuff! Yeah.

    In animation, when a comedian has a certain, very specific style, you don’t always get it coming through the character. Robin Williams in “Aladdin” is an exception —

    Samberg: Yes.

    But I felt that with you, Andy. And Katie, you felt really in the moment — all of your stuff felt really spontaneous.

    Samberg: If you knew Katie before, it’s spot-on Katie.

    Crown: It’s basically just me.

    When you come at a project like this and you’re doing a voice, what goes through your head as you’re getting ready to go in and do it? “Am I supposed to do a version of myself? Am I supposed to put a spin on it?” How do you approach something like this?

    Samberg: For me, just the first session with [director] Nick [Stoller] I kind of like played around with it until he said, ‘Yeah, that sounds good — do it that way,” and then I stuck with that. But, you know, there are still times that you step away from it for a while because they do all the animation, you come back to do more. I would forget what choices I’d even made, so they’d be very nice and play you some scenes and that sort of thing to sort of lock you back into the character.

    Crown: Yeah, playback is very handy for that if you’re away from it, because as a voice actor, you’re not there as much as the animators working on it. Your role is a little smaller — quite smaller in that sense. So when you’re away from recordings, you come back like maybe sometimes weeks later, and you’re like, “Oh, wait, how was I? How did that go? How was I sounding? What was my character?”

    Did you ever share the booth with other people, besides just the two of you?

    Crown: Yes.

    Samberg: Yeah, we did sessions with Kelsey [Grammer], and we did a day with Key and Peele, which was super fun.

    Crown: Yeah, I was there for Key and Peele, but I never actually recorded with Kelsey.

    Samberg: Oh, were you not there that day?

    Crown: No, I was there after, so I said hi.

    Samberg: Got it. That’s why I thought you were there.

    Crown: Yeah, because I was there?

    How was the Key and Peele session? Because those guys are like a well-oiled comedy machine.

    Samberg: They are. It was super fun.

    Crown: Yeah, it was really great. Andy had put it, “this is what it must feel like to be in a Key and Peele skit. Those guys are on top of it. They are fast! So it was very exciting and really funny.

    Was there anything different about this experience? Katie, you’ve done a lot of voice work. Was there anything specifically different about this?

    Crown: It felt very collaborative. Like, we had the scripts and stuff, but Nick gave us a lot of room to play and was open to our ideas or ways of saying certain things, and it was like, so it felt that we were all able to contribute. And it was nice. That made you feel good.

    Andy, what was the thing about Junior that you kinda said, “I can do this guy? I’m going to like being this guy for a while.”

    Samberg: That’s a good question. I think, just, I keyed into the jokes. That’s for me always what I focus on the most, where I’m like, if the joke writing feels in my wheelhouse.

    You know, Junior has got a little bit of a Jake Peralta vibe, actually — my “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” character — so it was kind of easy to just amp it up a tiny bit from that really, and then play to the story. But the writing was really great. That makes it easier.

    You got to hit some really good emotional beats, too, I thought. Was that a little different from some of the voice work that you’ve done?

    Crown: Yeah, I think so. I mean, the other shows are a lot — well, I’m not gonna say “not as good,” but I definitely had to hit some emotional notes. But it was in a very comfortable setting, so I didn’t feel self-conscious or weird about it. It was nice. But it was the first time really getting into something very deeply, like her character.

    A movie is so much different than doing an 11-minute-episode for an animated series. It goes so much deep and you really develop your character and get to know them very well.

    What was the first big animated movie that you got obsessed with as a kids?

    Samberg: Oh man! I like so many of them!

    Crown: I really like “Secret of NIMH” — that was one that I saw a lot.

    Samberg: “Secret of NIMH” is great.

    Crown: We’d get it on laser disc. We would rent a laser disc player. Anyway …

    Samberg: We would watch that. We would watch “Watership Down.” I used to watch the original “Hobbit” with my father, and we’d watch the Ralph BakshiLord of the Rings.” I was super into “The Sword in the Stone.”

    Crown: I never saw “The Sword in the Stone.” I had the book, though. You know when Disney had those bigger picture books …

    Samberg: The Fox and the Hound“.

    Crown: Yeah! “Lady and the Tramp” I think was the first animated movie I went and saw and I cried when she got, when she was running away from those dogs, she had a muzzle on.

    How about the ones where you saw as an adult and said, “Wow, this is not just for ten and under?”

    Samberg: I love “WALL-E.”

    Crown: Yeah, that’s a really sweet one.

    Samberg:The LEGO Movie,” honestly, really blew my mind, just how much they were able to cram into that, and the sort of the look of it and the scope of it, and how fast and crazy it got.

    Crown: We just saw “Kubo and the Two Strings” a couple of nights ago. That is insane. Oh my gosh, I’m very emotional. Have you seen it? It’s really good.

    Samberg: Hopefully it will be out of theaters by the time we come out, right? [Laughs] I do want to see it.

    Crown: I did enjoy it a lot, I’ve got to say. Yeah, not as good as “Storks.”

    Andy, when we left you on “Brooklyn Nine-Nine,” Jake was in a really interesting place where we left him off last season.

    Samberg: Yes. Give us just one second, Katie…

    Crown: I’m going to go catch up on that!

    But that was such a great cliffhanger. What can you tell me about where we’re coming back?

    Samberg: So [when] we pick up, Jake and Holt are in Coral Palms, Florida, and they’re in the witness protection, and they’re sort of trying to acclimate to their new lives. Jake has frosted tips. He’s really taking on the culture. Yeah, it’s fun. It’s fun. There’s a multiple episode arc of them in witness protection.

    What have you loved about having this show run as long as it has and to be able to kind of keep developing Jake and moving forward — or backward?

    Samberg: I’ve loved a million things about it. It’s been really, really fun to make, and it’s such, such a pleasant show, and that goes for the making of it as well. The tone of it speaks to the energy on set and the people who work on it. And the fanbase — honestly, like it really is a magnet for happy people.

    And you know in terms of the character, it’s been nice. It’s definitely right in my wheelhouse comedically, but the writers are so good that they find ways every year to sort of allow him to grow and mature a little bit, and face things in his past. It’s all the hallmarks of a good, solid show.

    And Katie, you’ve got a lot of projects going on, always. What’s front and center for you?

    Crown: I’m developing a series on Nickelodeon. So that’s kind of been in the works for a few years, but it hopefully gets some more answers in the next few months. It’s called “Francine.” They have a shorts program that you can pitch to, so my manager was like ‘You should pitch this thing.” So I did, and I got in! They choose about ten to make each year, and they liked my idea.

    So we made it with the studio and it did very well, and they want to develop it now for a series. But we’ve changed the look completely and re-cast some folks — I would voice the main character. But yeah, so we’ve just been making animatics and working through deadlines. It’s just like a very slow process, you know? But it’s been great. It is my favorite thing. I love seeing all of this stuff come together. And we have such a great team. So that’s most of the stuff I’m working on. And some voice stuff here and there.

    You both have had a lot of collaboration in your careers. It’s not like you’re off on your own doing your own thing all the time. So tell me, what do you love about finding somebody, especially comedically, that you collaborate well with?

    Samberg: For me, growing up with siblings and sort of the happiest feelings I ever had were like slumber parties and hanging out with my siblings and friends and giggling, and watching comedy and memorizing it and reciting it. Kind of just chased that feeling, and doing comedy collaboration is like a way to do that and also get paid for it. Which is a wonderful way to spend your time.

    Crown: It’s the dream, isn’t it? Being able to make stuff with your friends, and people that you relate to best who are all like-minded that you can like play off from each other. And get paid for it. Make a living out of hanging out with pals.

    How quickly did you guys know that you were going to work well as a team when you met to do this movie?

    Samberg: It was day one. As soon as it started, we were like, “Oh yeah.” Like, the chemistry was there.

    Crown: Oh yes. Very lucky thing. It was like instant, once we started speaking – like, the first record.

    Samberg: I think, if I may, I think Katie has a super specific voice, and she’s also a really good writer, and that is really helpful when you’re improvising, because you’re basically just writing on the fly. And it was so clear and funny to me that it was really easy to fall in step with her. I have said before, and I do believe you kind of set the pace for sort of the tone of all of our scenes. And it was easy for me. I just kind of like slipped in.

    Crown: Come on! Thanks!

    What haven’t you gotten to do in entertainment that’s still a genuine goal, one that you know why you want to do it?

    Crown: I want to make a horror movie so bad. I love horror so much and I can’t wait. I hope that some day I get to do that.

    Like, straight-up horror or with a little comedy twist?

    Crown: Yes. With comedy in it, too, but like super dark and gross. Yeah, I think that would be so fun.

    And obviously the same for you, Andy?

    Samberg: No, I’m terrified of horror movies. I’ve always said that I’d love to be like the comic relief in like a disaster film — like, no one ever asks! Or like the buddy of the superhero, who cracks wise a lot.

    Crown:San Andreas 2.”

    Samberg: Oh my gosh, I would do “San Andreas 2”!

    Crown: “That building fell!”

    Samberg: “Hey Dwayne, you might want to look up.”

    Crown: “Rebuild all this? Yeah, you’re on your own.”

    Samberg: I want to do like, yeah, a lot of snaps in front of a giant green screen.

    When did you guys know whether this was the path you wanted to follow? Did you know it when you were little kids, or did you figure it out along the way?

    Crown: I really liked doing voice stuff. I used to make radio plays all the time. My mom would bring home blank tapes.

    Samberg: I would do that, too.

    Crown: Yeah, and just like make dumb shows and have your sibling come in and talk to them and be different characters, and just dumb stuff. I think you’re naturally directed to do.

    Samberg: I feel like eight or nine years old for me, that was pretty much it. I just knew. And I had stumbled upon “SNL” and honestly, specifically, that was my main goal. For whatever reason, I was like, “I want to do that.”

    That must have been crazy when you got the call from “SNL,” then.

    Samberg: Oh, it made no sense. It was too perfect and crazy, like it blew my mind wide open. But, honestly, animation and animated movies were a huge part of my childhood. There was a long time I wanted to be a cartoonist. There was a long time I wanted to be an animator. As true for you as well, right?

    So, like, through comedy now getting to do this kind of stuff is like a secret dream come true, on top of the overt one of “SNL.”

    Why do you think you fell in love with in animation? Because you both obviously have a passion for it.

    Crown: I don’t know. I just love the classical stuff. I love watching people sketch. I love rough stuff, like looking at rough drawings and seeing the pages and like, yeah. I like the bare bones about it. Yeah, I think it’s just seeing there’s so many departments that have to come together and work together … It’s such a huge, complicated process. It’s very exciting.

    Samberg: I feel like the fact that there aren’t any actual rules — you can do whatever you want. It’s like, if you can think of it, you can just do it. The freedom of that, especially because all of my favorite entertainment in general, whether it be comedy or sci-fi or whatever, is sort of big imaginative stuff that’s fantastical and sort of breaks out of what we are stuck in in the reality of life. That’s always the most appealing thing to me.

    That’s why I like surrealist comedy so much. That’s why I like Monty Python, and Mel Brooks‘s stuff was really important for me when I was younger. And animation has that same kernel in it, which is it can just be whatever you want it to be. Which is wonderful.

    There is a cool timeless quality and a generational quality to animation, too. In 50 years, someone’s going to watch this cartoon and they’re going to hear your voice and hear your performance. That’s got to be kind of a cool thing to think about.

    Crown: Yeah. I didn’t think of that until just now!

    Samberg: That’s awesome. And we’ll still look just as good.

    “Storks” opens nationwide Friday, September 3rd.

  • Kit Harington Hits on Kyle Chandler in Adorable Emmys Bit

    68th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards - Show

    Clearly, Kyle Chandler is the man who rocks Kit Harington‘s chain. During the 2016 Emmy Awards, Kit Harington and Andy Samberg — co-stars of HBO’s “7 Days in Hell” — had a presenter bit where they aimed to create soundbites for next year’s Emmys commercial.

    Part of the bit included Kit fake proposing to Andy, but also Andy saying “No, I won’t kiss you, Kyle Chandler,” while Kit said he would kiss the “Bloodline” star. Kyle Chandler was in the audience, and seemed totally fine with getting a kiss from Kit.

    It’s on.

    Kyle might have some competition from Jimmy Kimmel, who revealed in his monologue that Harington’s “Game of Thrones” character, Jon Snow is his “freebie.”

    So Kit seems to be rocking some chains, too.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • 7 Reasons Why ‘TMNT2’ Stumbled at the Box Office

    TMNT2Welcome to the first really bad weekend of the summer. Even though this weekend saw three new wide-releases, it’s still the lowest-grossing weekend of Summer 2016 so far.

    The new “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows,” debuted at No. 1 with an estimated $35.3 million, but that’s just over half of the $65.6 million debut that the previous “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” enjoyed two summers ago. Romance “Me Before You” did half as well as “Out of the Shadows,” opening in third place with an estimated $18.3 million — besting Warner Bros.’ expectations. And Andy Samberg‘s boy-band mockumentary, “Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping,” underperformed with an estimated $4.6 million — landing in eighth place. Woof.

    Meanwhile, the modest sales of “Out of the Shadows” were enough to displace last week’s winner, “X-Men: Apocalypse,” which fell 66 percent in its second weekend to No. 2 with an estimated $22.3 million. Last week’s big box office disappointment, “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” also fell more than 60 percent, landing in fourth place with an estimated $10.7 million.

    C’mon, Hollywood, this is supposed to be the most lucrative season of the year, full of record-setting debuts of superhero sagas and family-friendly cartoons. What happened? What lessons can studio programmers learn from this weekend’s lackluster box office? Well, here are seven of them.

    1. Sequel-itis
    Remember, “TMNT” started out in the 1980s as a comic book parodying the “X-Men” franchise. It must be galling both to the publishers at Marvel and to the executives at Fox that their teenage mutants are playing second fiddle this weekend to the jokey, pizza-chomping, sewer-dwelling versions of their carefully cultivated intellectual property. Give credit, at least, to Paramount for recognizing that “X-Men: Apocalypse” was puny enough to be dethroned after just one week by a more kid-friendly team of comic-book heroes.

    2. In the Summer, Reviews Don’t Matter…
    Audiences know what they want from their summer escapism, critics be damned. “Popstar” had the best reviews among the new films, with a 78 percent “Fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes. “TMNT” had the weakest, just 37 percent. But the young male audience that “Popstar” targeted doesn’t care about reviews, and neither do the kids that “TMNT” sought. People were already predisposed to see (or avoid) both movies, and reviews weren’t going to sway them.

    Same with “Me Before You,” which had middling reviews (55 percent fresh) from critics who complained about the movie’s heartstring-yanking manipulativeness. Of course, that’s precisely the romantic movie’s biggest selling point. Feature, not bug.

    3. …And Neither Does Star Power
    Of course, the. stars of “TMNT” are all computer-generated, but the filmmakers have chosen to surround them with actors familiar from roles in grown-ups-only movies, like Arrow” star Stephen Amell joins the franchise as fan favorite Casey Jones, as if there’s much overlap between his dark, adult comic-book series on the CW and the “TMNT” kids.

    Meanwhile, Game of Thrones” wants to see her playing an adorable Manic Pixie Dream Girl in a contemporary romance.

    Andy Samberg, at least, is working within his usual wheelhouse as the star of musical spoof “Popstar,” and he and the other Lonely Island guys have been promoting the heck out of it on TV appearances and on social media. Nonetheless, the former “Saturday Night Live” mainstay and “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” star has never proved that his TV following will follow him to the big screen.

    4. There’s an Audience Starved for Romance
    “Me Before You” was expected to bring in only about $12 to $14 million, so its estimated $18.3 million take is a pleasant surprise. Chalk it up to smart counter-programming against the family-oriented and male-oriented movies otherwise dominating the multiplex.

    Indie romances “Love & Friendship” and “The Lobster” also added hundreds of theaters each this weekend and are reaping the benefits, with “Love” earning an additional estimated $2.2 million and “Lobster” clawing another estimated $1.6 million. As “Apocalypse” plummets,” “Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising” runs out of gas, and “Popstar” fails to get off the ground, it might be time for the studios to stop saturating the market with movies made for young men and start thinking about young women.

    5. Might Be Time for More Originality at the Multiplex
    In this weekend’s top 10, “Popstar” and “The Nice Guys” are the only two films not based on a pre-existing property. How’s that working out for them? It’s not so much that audiences only want to see sequels and reboots; rather, it’s that sequels and reboots seem to have crowded everything else out of the marketplace, at least throughout the summer. It seems that the ho-hum response to “TMNT 2” might be evidence of “sequel fatigue” among moviegoers, which could spell trouble for Hollywood this summer as sequels are what studios use to line their coffers during the season.

    While the aforementioned originals have proven to be misfires, audiences will still flock to original ideas — as long as they are executed in ways that make it worth our hard-earned box office dollars.

    6. There’s Only So Many Family Movie Dollars Out There
    This might seem counterintuitive, especially now that school’s out. But “TMNT” might have done better if it weren’t competing against “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” “The Angry Birds Movie,” “The Jungle Book,” and even “Zootopia” (still in 400 theaters after 14 weeks).

    7. The Math on Sequels Doesn’t Always Add Up
    The last “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles,” which relaunched the franchise in 2014, cost about $125 million to make and earned nearly $500 million worldwide. Given that, for blockbusters like these, marketing costs about as much as production, and that the studio keeps only about half of the worldwide ticket receipts, the 2014 “TMNT” just about broke even.

    Nonetheless, that was apparently good enough to justify a sequel, so now we have the $135 million “Out of the Shadows,” which will have to gross $540 million worldwide to break even. So far, it has taken in an estimated $69.3 million around the globe. Not a good sign.

    Who knows, maybe Turtle fans are willing to shell out another $470 million for this one, but because family dollars are finite, the new Turtle tale is likely to sink in a couple weeks when “Finding Dory” swims into the multiplex. There may have been a sweet victory in beating “X-Men: Apocalypse” in early June, but at least if “Out of the Shadows” had come out in August, like its predecessor, it could have had the multiplex all to itself for a whole month.

    %Slideshow-378100%

  • MTV Movie Awards: Watch The Lonely Island’s Will Smith Tribute

    2016 MTV Movie Awards - ShowThe 2016 MTV Movie Awards aired on Sunday, featuring a tribute to Will Smith, who took home the prestigious (for MTV, anyway) Generation Award. Before Smith collected his golden popcorn statuette from presenters Halle Berry and Queen Latifah, The Lonely Island serenaded the star with a medley featuring some of his greatest hits.

    In true Lonely Island fashion, the stunt was both goofy and infectious, paying tribute to Smith while also having fun with his ever-evolving musical styles (and fashion sense — shout-out to the one-strap overalls) from the late ’80s through the late ’90s. The trio — Andy Samberg, Jorma Taccone, and Akiva Schaffer — sang and danced their way through tunes including “Parents Just Don’t Understand” and “Summertime” (Smith’s breakout songs — when he was known as The Fresh Prince — with DJ Jazzy Jeff), the theme song from “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air,” the “Men in Black” title track (accompanied by some well-timed handclaps), and “Gettin’ Jiggy Wit It.”

    It’s a testament to Smith’s infectious earworms and enduring musical legacy that each song elicited a huge response from the crowd (especially the latter two tunes), despite none of them being released this century. Check out the clip above, and just try to prevent yourself from gettin’ jiggy in front of your computer screen. (Spoiler alert: It’s impossible.)

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-90806%

  • The Lonely Island Guys Are Getting a Saturday Sketch Comedy Show

    87th Annual Academy Awards - Backstage And AudienceFox is moving back into the sketch comedy genre with a new series conceived by comedy troupe The Lonely Island and actor Paul Scheer.

    The show, “Party Over Here,” will air on Saturday nights at 11 p.m., and be produced by the Lonely Island trio — Andy Samberg, Akiva Schaffer, and Jorma Taccone — and Scheer. The four comedians won’t star on the program, but Scheer (who currently stars on ABC sitcom “Fresh Off the Boat”) will direct.

    Instead, “Party Over Here” is led by an all-female cast, including Nicole Byer (“Girl Code”), Jessica McKenna (an alum of comedy troupes the Groundlings and Upright Citizens Brigade), and Alison Rich (a former “Saturday Night Live” writer). It’s Fox’s first foray into late-night sketch comedy since “MadTV” went off the air in 2009, after a 14-season run.

    “When we first conceived this idea, we thought of it as a spinoff of ‘Empire,’” said Samberg, Schaffer, and Taccone in a statement. “We failed miserably … now it’s much more of a sketch comedy show.”

    “In an age where most millennials don’t even know what a TV is, we are really excited to be getting into the TV business,” Scheer said in another statement.

    Though “Party Over Here” is airing on Saturday nights, it’s not expected to compete directly with that other famous weekend sketch show, “Saturday Night Live.” Fox’s series is a 30-minute affair, which will wrap by the time “SNL” starts at 11:30.

    “Party Over Here” debuts on March 12.

    [via: The Hollywood Reporter]

    Photo credit: Getty Images

    %Slideshow-765%

  • 5 Reasons for the Huge Box Office Success of ‘Hotel Transylvania 2’

    Has the box office gone batty?

    Hotel Transylvania 2” was widely expected to top this weekend’s chart, but pundits predicted an opening near $35 million, lower than the $42.5 million debut of the first film. After all, it was a sequel to a moderately popular cartoon that opened a full three years ago, an eon in kiddie-audience terms. Plus, it stars Adam Sandler, who’s been in a slump of late. And it was opening against some other high-profile wide releases and expansions — all during a typically slow September, when sales are down across the board.

    Instead, studio estimates say the vampire comedy took a $47.5 million bite out of the box office. Why was “Transylvania”‘s monster success such a shocker? Here are a few possible reasons.

    1. Good Timing
    There hasn’t been a mainstream kiddie cartoon for three months, since “Minions.” That’s a long time, and even with kids back in school, it’s understandable that weekend viewers would still rush to see this one. The per-screen average tells the story. Anything over about $7,000 indicates a high degree of anticipation and strong buzz among moviegoers. “Transylvania” grossed a healthy $12,653 per venue.

    Plus, it opened at a time when kids are starting to think about Halloween (it’s no coincidence that the original “Hotel Transylvania” was released on the same weekend three years ago), but also early enough so that it won’t run into competition from October’s “Goosebumps” movie.

    2. High Theater Count

    When in doubt, saturate the marketplace. The new “Transylvania” opened on 404 more screens than the original, for a total theater count of 3,754. With demand as high as the per-screen average suggests, even that many theaters wasn’t enough to dilute it.

    3. Adam Sandler’s Not Quite Finished

    At least not among children. Though his “Pixels” fizzled this summer, his man-child act still plays well among prepubescents. At least it does when they can’t see his face.

    4. The Doldrums Are Over
    As the supply-side economists used to say, a rising tide really does lift all boats. The sluggish sales season of the past six weekends at the box office is apparently over, with this week’s total ticket sales up a full 20 percent from last week. Whatever kept people away from the multiplex in recent weeks — most likely, sub-par movies — the drought has now lifted.

    Not only did “Transylvania” sell well, but “The Intern” opened at the upper end of expectations as well, earning an estimated $18.2 million to debut in second place. After opening last week on just 545 IMAX and large-format 3D screens, “Everest” expanded well on an additional 2,461 screens, for an estimated take of $13.1 million, good for fourth place.

    Even “The Green Inferno” did well, despite a near non-existent TV campaign and a release in just 1,540 theaters. The low-budget cannibal horror film from director Eli Roth and low-budget horror king Jason Blum made a point of targeting theaters where horror films have traditionally done well, and the result was a solid ninth-place debut estimated at $3.5 million (about $2.5 million more than Blum paid to acquire the movie).

    And “Sicario,” Emily Blunt’s art-house thriller, also cracked the top 10 after expanding from just six screens to 59. Last week, the film debuted with a per-theater average of $65,000, higher than any other movie this year. This week, it earned a still-massive $30,000 per screen, for an estimated total of $1.8 million. That sum, along with the movie’s 10th-place finish, are great results for a movie playing on fewer than 60 screens.

    What this all adds up to is that there is actually, finally, something for nearly everybody at the multiplex, at least this weekend. Which brings us to…

    5. Expert Predictions Still Off the Mark

    This column has been noting for months that professional box office trackers, both at the studios and in the media, have been lowballing estimates for movies that turned out to be hits. Even the trade press has taken notice of how often trackers are missing the boat, particularly on movies like “Pitch Perfect 2,” “Straight Outta Compton” and “War Room” that appeal to underserved audiences. Usually, that means ticket buyers who are not teenage boys or young men under 25. It especially refers to black audiences, Hispanic audiences, and women — groups Hollywood usually doesn’t know how to target and seldom even tries to reach.

    Didn’t think kids also counted as underserved audiences whose pent-up demand trackers were overlooking, but “Transylvania”‘s success suggests otherwise.
    %Slideshow-322407%

  • Emmys 2015: The 13 Most Memorable Moments

    %Slideshow-322250%
    There were so many random, inexplicable things going on during Sunday night’s Emmys. Why was Bradley Whitford wearing a fedora? Why was Amy Poehler wearing a hoodie that looked like Pennsatucky’s from “Orange Is the New Black”? Did the HBO Now username and password that host Andy Samberg revealed to an audience of millions actually work? (Actually, yes, but only briefly.) Why was the orchestra playing the music from the movie “Ghostbusters”? (Was it because Ray Parker Jr. was in the house band?) Why was everyone wearing green ribbons? (Because climate change was the political mcause du jour.) And what happened during Mel Brooks’ choppily edited presentation? Did he swear or were producers furiously trimming the 89-year-old legend’s words in order to keep the show under three hours?

    No doubt we’ll learn the answers to these burning questions in time. Meanwhile, we’ll be talking about these 13 moments from the 67th Emmys for a while, maybe even for ages yet to come, but almost certainly long after we learn the mysteries behind Whitford and Poehler’s head coverings.

  • Emmys 2015: Andy Samberg’s HBO Now Password Actually Works, Try It

    UPDATE: Well, HBO has either gotten wise or some joyless wonder went and changed the password on the rest of us. Either way, the username and password supplied by Andy Samberg doesn’t seem to be working any longer. Boo!


    Well, thanks, HBO and Andy Samberg!

    The host of the 2015 Emmy Awards had a little segment during the show where he offered up “his” HBO Now log-in, to give millions of viewers instant online access to the most nominated network. His username and password sounded so fake it was almost not worth seeing if they’d work — until fans online started noting that it did work.

    So we followed the instructions and entered this username and password into HBO Now:

    Khaleesifan3@EmmyHost.com
    password1

    Before “Andy,” the user name in the top right corner read “Thanks” and was later changed to “SAMBERG,” so don’t be surprised if it keeps changing. If you click on “Andy” — or whatever — it takes you to this page with his name and what was a “fakefakefake” e-mail address but is now apparently being changed (by fans?) every few minutes. Here’s how it looked around 9:30 p.m. ET on Emmys night:

    However it looks, it gives you a free trial of HBO programming. So now fans are catching up on “Game of Thrones,” “Veep” and other shows they couldn’t afford to watch before:

    Thank you, HBO and Andy! No idea how long this will last, so enjoy it while you can.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.
    %Slideshow-322234%

  • Andy Samberg on Hosting Emmys: ‘If I Think It’s Funny, I’ll Go For It’

    2015 Summer TCA Tour - Day 10 Actor and comedian Andy Samberg wants to deliver plenty of laughs when he hosts the 67th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards, so that means he’s getting very serious behind the scenes.

    The “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” star reveals that he’s binging on a plethora of the nominated series that he hasn’t seen or only sampled, in order to get the most complete feel of the landscape of the top tier of television quality as he heads in to helm the medium’s biggest celebration airs live on his sitcom’s home network FOX on Sept. 20.

    “I’m definitely watching more than I normally would,” the former “Saturday Night Live” player explains. “It’s more just researching them all, understanding the culture of each show, the fan bases that love that show, why they love that show, and what the big stories are to those people. Talking about how there’s so many more shows every year now, it does make it a slightly bigger challenge to cover everything.”

    “It’s also a little more challenging to bring all the viewers under one umbrella of consciousness of the television culture,” Samberg adds. “There’s some people who only watch this kind of show, and other people watch this kind of show. So we’re trying to figure out a way to make bigger jokes that you don’t necessarily have to have seen every show to understand, but you know the headlines of the big stories on TV this year.”

    As Samberg met with the press, he revealed a bit more about his take on the hosting gig and his emerging plans for Emmy night, plus a little tease on what’s ahead for the third season of his sitcom.

    Did you say yes to this offer right away, or did you want to think about it a bit?

    Andy Samberg: Yes, right away, absolutely…I think most people in comedy, so many incredible comedians do these shows. And looking at the pedigree of past hosts, it’s such an honor to be asked, you’ve got to say yes.

    Did any of the past hosts give you any advice?

    Well, I’ve been talking to Seth [Meyers], who hosted last year. He says it’s a blast. And I just have been asking little things here and there.

    Is it more nerve‑racking than other gigs?

    Not yet, but I think when it comes closer, it probably will be, yeah. Although I did seven years of “SNL,” and that’s live in front of millions of people…I think doing the show, itself, is really fun. I’m going to just try and not look at the Internet for a week after. I think it’s unwinnable in that way. But kind of everything is at this point, except for like three things a year. I think I’m going into it just going to try and make it as funny as I can possibly make it, but stick to the rule I always do which is: if I think it’s funny, I’ll go for it.

    How old were you when you first started paying attention to Emmys ceremonies and started watching them?

    Oh, that’s a good question. Probably like college. I mean, my folks weren’t like huge Emmy watchers. I’ve always been aware of the Emmys, just like you’re always aware of the Oscars.

    Were there hosts back then that you really gravitated toward?

    I’ve noticed it more recently, more since I’ve gotten into comedy. Seeing people like Conan [O’Brien] or Jane Lynch or Jimmy [Fallon] or Seth -– people like that, I really respect.

    Are there any musical numbers that you’re going to participate in?

    I certainly hope so, yeah. I’ve had good success with music stuff in the past. But again, it’s got to be the right idea.

    You literally have the chance to walk away with every Emmy Award on this show.

    Like, I could steal them all! Yeah, I could do that… [But] you know, I have one, so I feel pretty good about it. I’m holding out that they’ll give me like an honorary one for hosting.

    Have you put much thought into putting that balance of your brand of comedy and what the Emmy ceremony requires?

    I think there is a fine line. I like things maybe a little weirder than the broadest version of this show, from a hosting perspective. But I don’t know. It’s been ten years since I first started on “SNL.” I’ve got a little better gauge on what I can get away with, with a bigger audience and a smaller audience.

    How do you find that gauge?

    Just if everyone’s laughing at it, I tend to be like, “Let’s go for it.” That’s always my barometer. Sometimes there will be something that you know is funny in the room, but is going to push the wrong buttons. You don’t want to take that out there, because it’s just not worth it if people respond the wrong way. So that’s the main editing process, I think, aside from whatever you think is funniest is making sure that you don’t accidently piss people off or do something that’s insensitive.

    Doing something live like the Emmys, are you pretty much given free range to go wherever you want?

    I’ll be more or less on script. I mean, I think we’ll try and play the room as it comes. If interesting things happen, we’ll hopefully comment on those things. I always enjoy it when hosts do that.

    Is it exciting to do those in-the-moment jokes? Billy Crystal’s one of the masters of that.

    Yeah, without a doubt. Again, I keep saying this because you never know, but if it feels right, you do it. I think there’s a danger to wanting to force those things in too, and people are like, “Yeah, we didn’t really care about that moment that you’re harping on” [laughs].

    You’re also at work on your day job. How’s the season going on “Brooklyn Nine Nine?”

    The season, so far, has been awesome. I’m really happy to be back. They announced that my good friend Bill Hader is going to be coming in as Captain.

    How does he shake up the precinct?

    I’m not supposed to say anything more than that he’s coming, so I’m going to stick to that because I don’t want to get fired. But he will bring his patented brand of Bill Hader humor.

    Can you tell us where the show picks up?

    It picks up the moment that we left off in last year’s finale. So it’s like “Karate Kid 1” into “Karate Kid 2.”
    %Slideshow-320520%

  • 9 Things to Watch For During the 2015 Emmys

    %Slideshow-320024%
    You can expect the Emmy telecast, hosted by Andy Samberg and airing Sept. 20 on Fox, to stick with what’s worked in the past. As 13-time Emmy show producer Don Mischer told TV critics last month, there’s little point in reinventing the wheel. When it comes to creating a memorable awards show, he said, “the two things that make the most difference are ‘Who wins?’ and ‘What do they say?’ And as a producer you have absolutely no control over that.”

    Of course, those moments over which Mischer and 17-time Emmycast director Louis J. Horvitz have absolutely no control are the ones awards show viewers live for. So we’ll keep an eye out for spontaneity, but as for the rest of the show, there are 9 things we can expect to see.