Tag: amazon

  • How ‘Sneaky Pete’ Went From CBS Procedural to Amazon Marvel

    Giovanni Ribisi in Amazon's SNEAKY PETESo how did a procedural drama set in the world of bail bonds created for network television get turned into “Sneaky Pete,” a deeper, darker and decidedly serialized streaming series exploration of a career con artist who might finally see an opportunity to come clean? Blame the original Sneaky Pete himself: Bryan Cranston.

    As Amazon’s latest series featuring Breaking Bad” star who co-created, produces, and co-stars in the show, sat down with Moviefone and his collaborators — including stars Ribisi, The Americans”) — to reveal how they came together to tell the story of a lead character who may be a reverse take on Walter White. “In essence, there is a bad man possibly looking for ways to become good,” says Cranston.

    Bryan Cranston: The genesis of this was really very interesting. I gave a speech one year at an Emmys … I was very fortunate I was able to get on that stage a few times, so I wanted to say something that was more universal in my appreciation. So I said that when I was a kid, I was a sneaky kid.

    My parents were split, and it was kind of a rough childhood. I was circumventing responsibility and looking for shortcuts. My own family dubbed me “Sneaky Pete.” And I said, “Until I found the love, the passion, my love of acting — and that was at 22 years old that it finally culminated to that point. So for all of you, if you have lost that passion, you can still get back in touch with what brings you joy. All you Sneaky Petes out there.”

    And the next day, Zack Van Amburg, co-president at Sony, calls me and says, “On the way home, my wife and I were talking about Sneaky Petes, and a Sneaky Pete moment of me — and she had one! ‘What about our kids? Which one is going to be?’” And he called me and he said, “Congratulations — but also I think there’s a series here.” I go, “What’s the series?” He goes “I don’t know.”

    But he did leave me with this little nugget, and that was the germ of the idea: He said, “You were a teenager, so it’s forgivable. But what if you didn’t grow out of it? What if you were 35 and you’re still that way, what would you be?” And I went, “Let me think on that.”

    And that’s where we crafted Giovanni’s character, that it was this guy who really didn’t have a choice in his life. He was split. He had to figure things out on the run: started off with petty theft, and then he got more sophisticated in his stealing. He became the only thing he could become. And yet, hopefully, the audience will sense that in the core of this man’s being is goodness, but it’s so covered over. He doesn’t know how to reach it.

    He just doesn’t know. He has no experience in that. And we actually don’t know by the end of the series if that will erupt, or if he covers it back up because it’s too frightening to go into that.

    Giovanni Ribisi: All of the characters within the show has that, to a greater or lesser degree, everybody has that part of them, and it manifests itself in all the various relationships that we have. As far as the sense of bad or good, I think that ultimately, for all of us, it’s a survival thing. I think this is the way he was brought up, and this is the way he knows how to survive.

    There is that arrested development, and he was incarcerated in prison for three years. At the end of the day, there is some nobility in the fact that he’s doing what he’s doing for his brother. It comes down to that.

    Cranston: The fact that we know he can do something altruistic and out of love gives us hope in the character, and that’s all we really want to be. The pilot light of hope.

    Ribisi: My heart goes out to him. He does that because he also knows that really is that one vestige, that only thing that he has in his life. That only real, tangible thing within all the deceit, and the lies, and all that, that’s the one thing, relationship, that he can be himself. There’s that tacit, unspeakable relationship, that fraternity.

    There is that dynamic: good versus evil. Ultimately, I think with any good plot or story, there is, to a greater or lesser degree, a morality tale there. But it’s more human than anything. There’s that complexity where you say one thing but you’re meaning something else. And we all have that. I have that right now!

    Cranston: At first, David Shore and myself, we co-created the concept of it. The idea of bail bonds has been culminating in my mind, wanting to create a show dealing with that world, which is a thin layer away from criminality, is so interconnected. I thought, “There’s some dirtiness to it,” and I always wanted to figure out how to do that.

    It was originally produced for CBS, and CBS, of course, has their model. It would have been more procedural at CBS, and that’s what they want. A “skip of the week” kind of thing, and the relationship between the two cousins, so to speak, and what would happen there and how long. So the series-long secret would be his identity, but each week would be a different thing. So the construct seemed to work, and CBS loved it. It was very high in the testing. We were told that it rated second of all their dramas that year. So we were thinking, “Oh, this is good.” And it didn’t get picked up.

    David got to the point where he didn’t feel that he was the right guy to continue on a serialized version. He’s more broadcast. So he stepped away. We were friends, and it’s like, “OK, thank you. It’s what’s best.” I went after Graham Yost and seduced him, and got him to come on and be the captain of the ship.

    Graham Yost: I turned on my Amazon Echo, and I said, “Alexa, should I do this show?” And Alexa said, “If you know what’s good for you.” Bryan and I have known each other for almost 20 years, worked together on “From the Earth to the Moon,” and we’ve stayed friends ever since. The idea of working with him again was great. I loved the idea of a con show. I watched the pilot and went, “Oh, this is good. This is really good.”

    I love the characters … It was just that core cast to begin with, you don’t usually get handed that. It’s hard enough to construct that. It’s hard enough to write characters that are going to get people like that. But to be just given that, was like, “Wow — sh*t, half the work is done right there!”

    I’m just so grateful that they were able to talk this incredible cast into doing something that is a remunerative life, but is a very burdensome life to do a show, trying to do 22 episodes. That becomes your whole life. As fate would have it, now it’s this streaming show, a much more manageable 10.

    Ribisi: I think Bryan Cranston is one of our great American actors, and it’s just a privilege to have a conversation, even … I wasn’t familiar with Marin Ireland’s work before, but having worked with her, she just reminds me of one of those classic, sharp-witted Bette Davis-style actors. Margo Martindale — goes without saying. I actually worked with Peter Gerety years ago, and just remember how his talent stood out to me. It’s just one of those things. Especially with the captain [Bryan] here, everybody’s head is really about wanting to do the best job that they can, to do something that’s effective.

    Cranston: Amazon’s model is to point out what is working for them and what is not working for them, and allowing the creative team to solve it. As opposed to how broadcast networks have a tendency to be more hands on, more noting: “Can he be a podiatrist instead of a dentist?” Everyone get notes — we all get notes all the time. But theirs was, “We’re bumping on this thing,” or “We don’t quite think that this is clear enough.” “Got it — we’ll make that clear.” They don’t impose beyond the note, the initial note, which is a great partner to have.

    Yost: It’s incredibly difficult [to write a show about cons], but it’s fun when it works out. Some of my fondest memories on this show in terms of the writing of it are being on the set in New York when we were shooting the first episode after the pilot, and getting a call from the writers’ room, and they said, we’ve got this idea we want to run by you. And they got to this point, and I went, “Sh*t, that’s it — that’s fantastic!” It’s so exciting. I just love the big twists that the writers room was able to come up with.

    It’s also very difficult because television, unlike a feature where you’re just doing this one thing, you can rewrite the script 20 times, figure it all out, figure out the plan for the shooting. It’s like we didn’t have everything worked out. It’s usually laying the track and the train starts rolling — we’re building an airplane in flight. And then there were times we went through a lot of turbulence. So it’s like, “Oh sh*t — what are we going to do now?” And we make big adjustments.

    But we got through it. I think we landed the plane pretty well, when you see the whole season. But it’s doing a con show, and all those twists and turns, and who’s doing what, it’s not easy, but it is really fun.

    Margot Martindale: The best new part is that I haven’t quite figured it all out yet. I guess that’s maybe not so good sometimes, but I think for this, I think it’s good for me. Because it’s brand-new, and because it can be what I want it to be; it’s fun. It’s like getting a paint-by-numbers, and putting a little bit of color here, then a little color here, and then, “Ooh, there’s the face. Here’s the arm.” And I like to see that all filled in. And I think I got close to that in this first season.

    Marin Ireland: When you get deep in the season, there was definitely a day where there was a scene that a bunch of us were in, and at one point finally we were going, “Do any of you guys get what is happening right now?” And Margo would be like, “I think I do.” You’re like, “I think I do — what do you think is happening? And it’s like our characters didn’t know any of it, so it didn’t matter. But it was us as the actors: “Am I a dummy? Is this complicated?”

    Martindale: Trying to read the truth is fun. Really fun. And complicated. And also, trying to keep all the balls in the air right now is really complicated for me. It’s also fun to have secrets and to layer the story in. As the writers layer the story in, to find your way into what my input is into those layers. It’s a wonderful group, and it’s wildly fun.

    I’d said to these guys as we were out in the middle of the woods, about four in the morning — I can’t remember where we were, I said, “I love you guys!” This is such a great group of people. It’s a very wonderful group of actors to work with. It’s kind of egoless, and everybody, we’re all there to do the best story possible. So that makes fun to go to work.

    “Sneaky Pete” is now streaming on Amazon Prime Video.

  • Amazon Renews ‘Man in the High Castle’ for Season 3

    Dystopia isn’t ending anytime soon on “The Man in the High Castle.” Amazon announced that it is renewing the dark thriller for a third season.

    The series broke viewing records for Amazon in season 1, and the streaming service claimed that season 2 premiered with the most viewers over its debut weekend than any of its other original series.

    Season 2 continued to explore the story of what America would’ve been like if the Allies had lost World War II. Germany controls the East Coast, while Japan oversees the West. Meanwhile, insurrection is brewing in the heartland.

    Amazon also revealed that a new showrunner will come on board in season 3. Original executive producer Frank Spotnitz abruptly left in the middle of season 2 after reportedly clashing with Amazon. Now, “Bosch” executive producer Eric Overmyer (who also co-created “Treme”) will take the reins.

    “As timely as ever, the exploration of characters at a dark point for humanity has provided incredible stories for two seasons,” Amazon Studios comedy and drama chief Joe Lewis said in announcing the renewal. “Eric and his team are doing an incredible job crafting stories about the inner lives of those who struggle to do good in a world that is not. We couldn’t be more excited to bring Season 3 to customers in 2017.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Carrie Fisher’s Final Role, in ‘Catastrophe,’ Shot Week Before Death

    When “Catastrophe.”

    On Friday, Dec. 16, star/show creator Sharon Horgan shared this photo with Fisher on the London set:

    Me, General Leia and Kylo Ren’s hand on the set of #catastrophe3 @hellomerman

    A photo posted by Sharon Horgan (@sharonhorgan) on

    “Catastrophe” Season 3 just finished filming, marking Fisher’s final acting role. On Dec. 27, after news of Fisher’s death broke, Horgan returned to Instagram to repost the same photo, this time with a more somber caption:

    “Carrie was my friend. It took me three series but I got her in the end. She was the most generous, fun, gifted, smart, kind, funny funny funny person I’ve ever met. She certainly wasn’t ready to go. I’m so glad we became pals. I’m so devastated at her loss. I want to write about her more but I can’t process yet.”

    Horgan told Vulture she and co-star Rob Delaney knew they wanted Fisher for “Catastrophe” after watching the actress give a “great speech” at a U.K. awards show. “I turned to Rob, and I went, ‘That’s your awful mother!’” The “Catastrophe” stars initially tried to connect with Fisher via Twitter and then went the more traditional agent route. Fisher told Vulture she loved the show and the writing, and was happy to accept the role. “I did really want to play an awful person,” Fisher said. “There are not a lot of choices for women past 27. I don’t wait by the phone.” Horgan replied, “We still to this day can’t believe that you said yes.”

    According to TVLine, “Catastrophe” Season 3 is slated to premiere on Amazon early next year. Fisher had already wrapped her role as Princess/General Leia in “Star Wars: Episode VIII,” but it still remains to be seen how they will handle Leia’s storyline in “Episode IX.”

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Amazon Offers Free First Season Streaming of 3 Originals This Holiday Week

    Heads up, here’s some actual good news: You have one week left to try to enjoy 2016, and Amazon is ready to help. Amazon Prime Video is making the first seasons of three of its most popular original series available for free for one week. As they shared in a press release:

    All Amazon customers in the U.S. (Prime and non-Prime) will be able to binge on the first seasons of “Bosch,” “The Man in the High Castle,” and “Mozart in the Jungle” starting today through Saturday December 31 11:59pm PST.

    To start watching visit www.amazon.com/binge.

    “The Man in the High Castle” just released Season 2, and “Mozart” just streamed Season 3, so Amazon is clearly aiming to hook newcomers on these first seasons so they subscribe for more. Tricksy hobbitses. It’ll work, too.

    Here are Amazon’s synopses for each series:

    “The Man in the High Castle”

    Based on Philip K. Dick’s Hugo Award-winning 1962 alternative history, the Emmy Award-winning Amazon Original Series The Man in the High Castle—currently in its second season—is one of Amazon’s most watched original series.

    The first seasons of the series considers the question of what would have happened if the Allied Powers had lost World War II. Almost 20 years after that loss, the United States and much of the world has now been split between Japan and Germany, the major hegemonic states. But the tension between these two powers is mounting, and this stress is playing out in the western U.S. Through a collection of characters in various states of posing (spies, sellers of falsified goods, others with secret identities). The hour-long dramatic pilot starred Alexa Davalos (Mob City) as Juliana Crain, Luke Kleintank (Pretty Little Liars) as Joe Blake, Rupert Evans (The Village) as Frank Frink, Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa (Mortal Kombat Legacy) as Tagomi, Joel De La Fuente (Hemlock Grove) as Inspector Kido, Rufus Sewell (Eleventh Hour) as John Smith and DJ Qualls (Z Nation) as Ed McCarthy. Executive Producers include Ridley Scott (Blade Runner), David W. Zucker (The Good Wife) and Isa Dick Hackett, with co-executive Producers Jordan Sheehan of Scott Free Productions (The Good Wife, The Andromeda Strain), and Executive Producers Stewart Mackinnon and Christian Baute of Headline Pictures (The Invisible Woman).

    “Mozart in the Jungle”

    The multi-Golden Globe Award-winning series, Mozart in the Jungle—currently in its third season—is based on the critically-acclaimed memoir Mozart in the Jungle: Sex, Drugs & Classical Music by Blair Tindall. The series draws back the curtain at the New York Symphony, where artistic dedication and creativity collide with mind games, politicking and survival instincts. The series stars Gael García Bernal (Salt and Fire), who was awarded the Golden Globe award for Best Actor in a Musical or Comedy Series, Lola Kirke (Gone Girl), Saffron Burrows (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), Malcolm McDowell (The Mentalist), Bernadette Peters (Smash), Hannah Dunne (Frances Ha) and Jason Schwartzman. It is Executive Produced by Roman Coppola (Moonrise Kingdom), Jason Schwartzman (The Darjeeling Limited) and Paul Weitz (About a Boy).

    “Bosch”

    Going into its third season in 2017, and already greenlit for a season four, the hit Emmy-nominated Amazon Original Series is based on Michael Connelly’s best-selling novels, and stars Titus Welliver (Lost) as Detective Harry Bosch, Jamie Hector (The Wire) as Jerry Edgar, Amy Aquino (Being Human) as Lt. Grace Billets, Madison Lintz (The Walking Dead) as Maddie Bosch and Lance Reddick (The Wire) as Deputy Chief Irvin Irving.

    The first season relentless LAPD homicide detective as he pursues the killer of a 13-year-old boy while standing trial in federal court on accusations that he murdered a suspected killer in cold blood. Guest stars on Bosch include Scott Wilson (The Walking Dead) as Dr. Guyot and Troy Evans (ER) as Detective Johnson, and was developed for television by Eric Overmyer (Treme, The Wire, Homicide: Life on the Streets) and Executive Produced by Overmyer, Connelly, and Henrik Bastin (The Killing, Burn Notice).

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • ‘Good Girls Revolt’ Canceled by Amazon After One Season

    Good Girls Revolt“Good Girls Revolt” won’t be revolting for a second season.

    Amazon has canceled the drama, which followed female journalists battling sexism in the late ’60s. Creator Dana Calvo confirmed the news on Twitter, with a reference to Hillary Clinton’s loss in the presidential election:

    The series starred Genevieve Angelson, Anna Camp, Erin Drake, Grace Gummer, Joy Bryant, and Hunter Parrish, and was inspired by Lynn Povich’s book of the same title. The book chronicled landmark sexual discrimination cases, and in the show, the women are researchers who don’t get any of the credit or glory that the male reporters do.

    “Good Girls Revolt” debuted to mostly positive reviews and was a hit with women viewers. Sony, which produces the show, reportedly intends to shop it around to other outlets.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • The Musicians Go Solo in ‘Mozart in the Jungle’ Season 3 Trailer

    Mozart in the JungleYou can’t have harmony when everyone goes solo, as the first trailer for “Mozart in the Jungle” season 3 notes.

    Season 3 finds Rodrigo (Gael García Bernal), Hailey (Lola Kirke), Cynthia (Saffron Burrows), and the rest of their symphony family scattered to the winds after a lockout. Rodrigo journeys to Venice to conduct the long-awaited return concert of opera diva Alessandra (Monica Bellucci). Meanwhile, Hailey becomes disenchanted with her career as an oboeist as she tours across Europe — but discovers a new passion for conducting.

    It should be interesting to see all the players working apart from each other and exploring their individuality, even as some characters, like Bernadette Peters’ Gloria, try to bring them back together again.

    García Bernal gets most of the spotlight in the trailer, hardly surprising considering he won a Golden Globe for his performance last year. And we’re intrigued by the glimpses we see of Bellucci’s opera diva. No doubt tempers (and passions) will flare.

    “Mozart in the Jungle” season 3 begins streaming Dec. 9 on Amazon.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Amazon Picks Up Robert De Niro, Julianne Moore Crime Drama From David O. Russell

    US-ENTERTAINMENT-SAG AWARDS-PRESS ROOM

    Amazon is shelling out the big bucks once again to acquire a high-profile TV project.

    Just a couple weeks after the streaming service picked up “Mad Men” creator Matthew Weiner’s next series for $70 million, it has landed an untitled drama created by David O. Russell (“Silver Linings Playbook,” “American Hustle”) and starring Oscar winners Robert De Niro and Julianne Moore, according to Deadline.

    This marks the second collaboration between Amazon and the Weinstein Company, which jointly will pay $160 million for two eight-episode seasons. De Niro reportedly will make $850,000 an episode.

    Not much is known about the series other than that it is a mafia crime drama. Like Weiner’s project, it was heavily pursued by various networks, including FX.

    The series reunites Russell with his “Silver Linings Playbook” and “Joy” star, De Niro, who can next be seen playing Bernie Madoff in HBO’s “Wizard of Lies.” Moore, meanwhile, next stars in Todd Haynes’ “Wonderstruck” on Amazon.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • How ‘Good Girls Revolt’ Star Erin Darke Connects to Feminism of 50 Years Ago

    ENTERTAINMENT-US-2016 AMAZON TCA SUMMER PRESS TOURErin Darke is hoping to shed a little light on a time and place when women learned they’d have to fight for every right they hoped to claim.

    On “Good Girls Revolt,” Amazon’s new streaming series based on the real-life feminist rebellion within the ranks of the female researchers at Newsweek magazine during the late ’60s and early ’70s, Darke plays Cindy, one of the series’ three central heroines and the one with perhaps the furthest to go in her consciousness awakening: when we meet her, she’s already bought in to a less-than-fulfilling marriage and experiences her own sexual liberation as the female staffers fight against sexist attitudes and policies in their workplace.

    With an early career path already filled with key guest stints on popular series like “Girls” and supporting turns in films like “Still Alice” and “Love and Mercy,” Darke gets her first major showcase in “Good Girls Revolt,” even as she adjusts to a degree of reflected celebrity in her off-camera role as Daniel Radcliffe‘s romantic partner — all of which she’s devoted considerable thought to, as she revealed in a wide-ranging conversation with Moviefone.

    Moviefone: So, I’m curious, with this show, how much of this was a real education for you on the ’60s? Did you have a sense of that era — other than what you might have watched on “Mad Men”? And how tough it could be for women in the workplace?

    Erin Darke: [Laughs] Yeah, I think I would say that I had a sense of it. I had a general idea of it. But the show was definitely an education in the specifics and just how bad it was. And the fascinating thing is in talking to Lynda Obst, one of our producers, who was a female journalist at that time, one of the things she says is like, “We actually toned down the sexism a lot for the show.” Which is astounding.

    You hear some of the stories about that time, and for me, being a young woman who was raised after that, that has grown up in this era, it’s almost hard to believe sometimes. You’re just like, “That can’t be real. That can’t be less than 50 years ago.” It’s pretty crazy.

    Fifty years removed, we are still having some pretty important conversations about women in society that we’ve taken a while to get around to — we’d kind of set it aside. What are the things that you did relate to, even though the sexism certainly was more rampant back then? What things did you say, “Oh my God, that is still a part of my life today”?

    A great deal of it is. I think, actually, some of it has gone away, in that it was such a common thing at that point — especially most men, even good men at that point, had never been taught or seen anything different. So even the good guys that probably were open-minded, most of them at that point were still sexist, because that’s just how they’d been raised.

    One of the lovely things about now is that men also have been raised in different ways. So most of the men in my life would never do a lot of that. But I think as we’ve seen recently — and as we’ve clearly seen in this election — so much of that still exists, and I think hadn’t gone away, but was just unspoken for a long time.

    It’s funny, because I’ve had a lot of conversations with other women and with a lot of my female cast mates lately about the national conversation that this election in particular has really started, and also how that conversation has sort of brought back up, in all of us, all of those times. That I have been groped by a fellow actor when I was having to be unconscious on stage, or groped in the subway, or yelled at on the street by some guy that he wanted to see my p*ssy.

    Those are things that are actually part of everyday life for most women, and, in some horrible way, I think we had all gotten used to it. It was angering and horrible, but you do almost get used to it because it happened so much. I’m so happy that we’re having an actual conversation again. For me coming out of this show, lit me with this fire of like, “We can’t be OK with that. We can’t just sit down and take that, and we can’t normalize it.”

    With your character specifically, what were the interesting ways into her? She occupies a very unique place in that she’s the one who’s already bought into the status quo, and is now going to be having an awakening. So how did you kind of find your way into Cindy?

    It was interesting. When I first started, I was finding, when I was looking at her, that Cindy is so different from me in pretty much every aspect of life. Yet, I was finding myself relating to her, and sympathizing with her, and finding it very … I don’t want to say easy to play her, but there was an ease in falling into that skin. I sat there and was trying to think of why.

    I realized that I think I have been raised in a time where I was told by my parents and told by the people in my life that I could have whatever I wanted, and that made me happy, and I could do whatever I wanted, and it was important for me to work and find a passion. I realized that Cindy is sort of this alternate universe version of me that hadn’t been raised that way: the 12-year-old girl who’s just trying to figure herself out, and, instead of being told you can do what you want, being told this is what your life will and should be.

    That’s the thing. She has, unlike the other girls who are having this awakening in ideas, she has already made those decisions. She is already on that path and trying to extricate herself from that, both emotionally, and mentally, and logistically. It’s so hard. I think, more than anything, I just have this deep love and sympathy for her. I feel like I’ve known those women, even today. I feel like I can see myself in her in another world where I was raised in that time period.

    The flip side of the more serious issues of doing a period piece like this is that you do get to time travel and kind of be immersed in the style and the popular culture of that time. What did you just come away loving from ’60s style and pop culture? What really made an impression on you?

    That’s a good question. I love the music. I’m not sure that Cindy has the best taste in music. She has a line in one episode where she says, “They stopped making music after Pat Boone.” I was like, “OK — not my choice, but you go there, Cindy.”

    It’s interesting, because I think the clothes look great and the environment is very cool to go to and to live in, but I don’t want to go back there. The clothes look great. Most of the ones I wore anyway were not very comfortable. The social setup, the casual sexism, the women being underappreciated for what they do, and underpaid, and under-recognized — I don’t want to go back to any of that.

    I think the only thing that I really responded to in that era was the activism, was the action. I think I feel a lot like I’ve been raised in a generation of people talking a lot about what they’re not happy with, but aren’t actually doing anything about it, or not knowing how to do anything about it. I think what’s really inspiring to me about the late 1960s, early 1970s, is how much people were doing things about the issues. And they saw inequality, they protested, they filed lawsuits, they acted to make it better. And we wouldn’t be where we are right now if those same people had just talked about how it was bad and never done anything.

    I feel like given the cyclical nature of history, I kind of feel like we’re just entering another period that’s going to be very similar to the late ’60s.

    I agree. I agree. I think that was one of the most shocking things to me in doing just like research on the history of that period and what was happening in the country, and sort of realizing that it can feel unrelatable. It felt very much like a reflection of what’s happening now. You can see the country kind of groaning, and creaking, and needing to change, and try and figure out how that change happens.

    How much of a research nerd are you? Do you really like to have lots of homework? Or do you just try to find your way emotionally into what you’re doing?

    I think, as an actor, and with a character, I like to find my way emotionally into what I’m doing. I think that’s the beautiful thing about doing a period piece, is you have that moment where you realize that we’re all just humans, and were still humans, they just had a different set of social rules around them, and a different culture around them.

    My research is more into like, what is this time period? What was happening around them? What was the time period of their parents? How were they raised? And try to go in with all of that information, so that when you actually get on set, you can just approach it from a human and instinctual place.

    What’s been the fun of taking part of such a female-centric show and having so many women working together, both on camera and behind the scenes?

    It’s been great. To be totally honest, it’s been a really, really lovely, and I think a sort of like bonding and very open experience. Especially because so much of the things that we’re dealing with on the show are women’s issues. It was so lovely to have people next to you, in front of the camera, and also behind camera that just had an understanding of what that was, an innate understanding. It’s lovely.

    There are very different energies between most men and most women on set. And there was something that was really lovely about being in such a feminine energy while also having these kick-ass women who did their jobs incredibly well.

    There were a couple of moments where we would be in rehearsal, and I would look around and realize that every person in the room was a woman: from our director, to our script coordinator, our DP, our first AD, all of the actors. It just was this moment of like, there’s been so much talk about equality in my industry in particular, and there were great moments of looking around and being like, “This can happen. This is not impossible.” There are very qualified, intelligent women in all of these jobs, and we just have to keep pushing to make it happen.

    How much of a fighter have you had to be just to follow your own path? Did you have a lot of support when you decided you wanted to go into the arts? Or did you really have to take a stand and make it happen?

    My parents were always supportive of me exploring the arts. When I told them that I wanted to be an actor, they didn’t really believe me for a long time. Then, when I got to college, there were the conversations about, “Shouldn’t you minor in something that’s a little bit more practical?” I think once they realized that I was determined, they’ve been very supportive since then.

    But in general, I am a girl from Flint. There were no other actors or really people in the arts in my family. My parents were supportive fairly quickly, but nothing else really in my life was. There were a lot of like, “Yeah, if you want to do that, you go ahead and try, but like, good luck girl.” It was a struggle. It was a fight.

    I moved to New York when I was 21 with my best friend. We had no money and no idea what we were doing. You just have to fight. You just have to keep going. You get beaten down far more times than you get lifted up. But you have to have some sort of like, probably insane faith in yourself, and keep going.

    Do you remember the thing that put you on that path? Do you remember the moment where you’re like, this is not only what I think I want to do, but probably what I have to do?

    I think I had a great deal of those small moments over the years. When you start to realize that, after like 100 noes, when you finally get that yes, it’s worth it. For me, I think the huge one, the really, really big one actually came later.

    I started working in casting. I was a casting associate full time for three years. I actually loved the job. I loved my bosses. They seemed to think I was good at it. I loved being there. I loved getting to know the other side of film and working with directors that I never would have gotten to work with. I had this moment of being like, this is the best possible job that I ever could have found that is not being an actor. And I just wanted to be an actor. It was an amazing job, but it wasn’t what I wanted in my life.

    So I stepped away, and it was terrifying at the time because I, again, went from having a steady income and the place that I could go every day and feel productive, to sort of being back to blowing in the wind as an actor and just hoping you can pay your rent.

    In the meantime, you’ve paid the rent and you’ve amassed a nice body of work, and you’ve also gotten to sample the spotlight of celebrity as a result of your relationship with Daniel. How do you feel about that, from the perspective of being an actor trying to do good work, but also ending up in the glare of that spotlight?

    I’ve been in a really interesting position of sort of getting to observe the spotlight. It shines a little over on the sidelines every once in a while, but I mostly got to observe. It’s funny, because I think my actual career aspirations have changed from that. The careers that I look up to and say, “Hey, I would love to have that person’s career,” have kind of changed.

    There is an innate relation between being a working actor and fame. I hope very much now to try and find a way to be industry-famous, I guess. That’s my dream career, is that person who gets to work all the time on cool projects and people in the industry know who you are, but the average person on the street would be like, “Oh yeah, I guess I’ve seen that girl in things before, but I don’t know her name.”

    I don’t think fame is a thing that should be aspired to. There are benefits, but there are also downsides. I don’t know how well I would handle those. I don’t know if that would make me happy. I just like my job. I just like being an actor.

    I think “Good Girls Revolt” is going to go a long way for that reputation within the industry, and I think probably beyond the industry as well.

    We’ll see! My biggest dream is that Cindy is just different enough for me. Once you take off the hairpiece and the glasses and I’m on the street, my biggest hope is that no one will ever recognize me.

    “Good Girls Revolt” Season 1 is streaming now on Amazon.

  • ‘Mad Men’ Creator Matthew Weiner’s Next Series to Stream on Amazon

    AMC Emmy After Party 2011This time around, Matthew Weiner has no shortage of network suitors.

    Sixteen years ago, Weiner shopped his pilot script for “Mad Men” to HBO and Showtime, but both networks passed. Years passed before AMC finally picked it up.

    Now — after “Mad Men” won 16 Emmys and five Golden Globes — Weiner is ready to make his second series, and six entities engaged in a heated bidding war for the project, according to Deadline. The lucky winner was the Weinstein Company and Amazon, which will pay $70 million for the eight-episode series.

    Weiner won’t be returning to the ’60s for his new project. Instead, Deadline reports it will be an anthology series (all the rage right now) set in the present day and in locations around the world. He will write and executive produce, as well as direct about half of the episodes.

    That’s a huge chunk of change for a television series, but Weiner’s track record speaks for itself. “Mad Men” made AMC a player in prestige scripted series, won boatloads of awards, garnered heaps of critical acclaim, and became a pop culture phenomenon.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

  • Billy Bob Thornton Is Down-and-Out and Seeking Justice in ‘Goliath’

    With his captivating, awards-gathering turn as ice-cold contract killer Lorne Malvo in the first season of “Fargo,” Goliath.”

    The actor (and Academy Award-winning filmmaker) takes on the role of rumpled attorney Billy McBride for the new David E. Kelley-created series — which drops all 10 episodes on Oct. 14 — a formerly high-powered legal ace now taking meetings in his favorite Oceanside watering hole across the way from his no-frills hotel residence.

    The role is an about face from the amoral, self-possessed Malvo, and an ideal fit for Thornton, who’s seen his share of highs and lows throughout his career, as he revealed when Moviefone joined him in a small press roundtable.

    What was the first thing that hooked you on this project? What was the thing about it that, after “Fargo,” made you say, “I think I want to do another TV show”?

    Billy Bob Thornton: Well, “Fargo” was such a great experience. There’s no independent film business anymore. If you’re going to do it, you’ve got to do it for Amazon, or Netflix, or whatever. So it’s either do big studio movies, which are mainly sort of video game kind of movies, or cartoons for kids — which have their value; I’m all for them. But I’m not the first guy they call for that.

    So the kind of movies that I made are now being made on premium cable, so you look around to see what’s out there. This offer came to me, and I always wanted to play a lawyer, especially one with a sense of justice that’s not exactly like what the legal system generally likes. Also, I like to play characters that are kind of down and out, trying to claw their way back. Been there myself.

    How do you bring the originality to that type of character, which can sometimes be a trope? How do you make that kind of fresh when you’re approaching it?

    You do it by having a bunch of scenes that maybe aren’t so related to that, and when you have the opportunity to make a scene different, you speak up. You say, “Hey, what if we did this instead?” So, at least with the stuff that I was involved in, every day we tried to make sure that we weren’t doing just a standard TV scene or something. The other folks, I can’t just go change their stuff. It’s not my show. But at least in terms of my stuff, I try to, if I saw an opportunity to do something that maybe raise the bar a little bit, I would try to do it.

    But it inherently, while it may be a story we’ve seen certain aspects of before, it’s so timely right now to have the sort of David and Goliath story, because we’re so all concerned right now with corporate stuff and governmental things. People against the system. So I think it’s timely in that way.

    In a way, it reminded me of a modern day “Rockford Files.”

    Oh yeah.

    Where it’s fun to see him down and out.

    Yeah, exactly.

    And then see him turn things around. Did you kind of get that feeling?

    Absolutely. I didn’t think in the beginning, but then I remember I was doing a scene on the boat with the Marquez brothers. I was doing a scene down there, and it was kind of like a combination of like “Columbo” and “Rockford” because it’s like, “Hang on a second. Let me ask you a question …” Because I am kind of a regular guy doing it. It’s not like the lawyer you normally see in the button-down suits all the time. I drive that beat-up car that I love. So there are real similarities to those things, and I loved those shows when I was growing up. I still watch them. So it’s nice to have one that’s a modern-day show, but has some aspects of the shows that we loved seeing. So that was one of the things.

    Had you ever played a lawyer before?

    I did. I played in “The Judge,” with Robert Downey and [Robert] Duvall, but that was more as a cameo. So I didn’t get to do it much, but I liked it. When I did that it was like, “Wow. Yeah. I’d like to do this for a little longer.”

    Lawyers and actors have a real similar job. A lawyer’s trying to put on a show for the jury. They’re coming up with their character, or telling their witness how to act, or whatever. Acting as a director for their witnesses. If you’ve seen the ESPN documentary, you see exactly how much coaching goes into preparing folks. So in the movie business, we’re trying to sell our story to an audience. I think in that sense, they’re very similar.

    Lawyers have to be good actors. There’s no doubt about it. But, fortunately, actors don’t have to be good lawyers in real life.

    You have good lawyers.

    You try to!

    His regular hangout is one of my very favorite places in Santa Monica, Chez Jay on Ocean Avenue.

    Oh, I know, right? I used to hang out there.

    Much of the series takes place in that geographic territory in Los Angeles, that very specific Santa Monica locale, and it feels very specific. What was intriguing to you about doing that and having that kind of specific backdrop?

    Well, I used to hang out at Chez Jay. I remember other actor friends of mine who really frequented the place. I guess when I first moved to L.A. 36 years ago, Santa Monica was like this sort of paradise that you’d always heard about or whatever, and it’s famous. There’s the pier and the Boardwalk and all that kind of stuff. So I guess I remember it that way.

    Now, I’ve lived here most of my life. It’s like, I go down to Santa Monica now, I’m used to it. But you can see the look on people’s faces who aren’t from here, how cool they think it is to be down there. So to have a place in a touristy area like Chez Jay, which really is just a dive, it’s cool to have a place there where locals like to hangout. As opposed to say some restaurant where mainly tourists go to.

    When this project came to you, did you consider coming in as a producer?

    I don’t like it when I’m the smartest guy in the room. I’d rather be the dumbest guy in the room. I like to go to work and be just an actor, just go do my job and go home. So being a producer to me doesn’t really appeal to me much.

    As a director, when I direct my own stuff, I direct it mainly as self defense. It’s like, I write a script, and then why would I give it to this guy? I already know what it’s supposed to be. That’s the only reason I direct, frankly, and I don’t do it very often. And I think these days, the kind of movies that I want to make as a director are probably passé at this point. All the stuff I write is based on Southern literature. I’m not sure there’s an audience for that.

    Would you want to do a TV show, though, yourself, as the principal creative force?

    I’ve actually come up with a couple that we’re talking to some people about. I can see doing that. I wouldn’t want to be a guy who was there on a daily basis, in, like, a writers’ room doing that. I’m not — otherwise I’d just go back to the sawmill, you know what I mean? Like I used to. I mean, I got out of the sawmill so I could do something that changes all the time. You know what I mean?

    What prompted your move to L.A. 36 years ago?

    Buddy of mine was coming out here, wanted to be a screenwriter. I was in music, mostly. I came out here to see if maybe I could get in a band out here, because the band I was in at the time had broken up.

    I was in [a ZZ Top cover band] at one point, yeah — late ’70s, about ’79, I guess — we did it for a couple years. Because I was in a band that sounded a lot like them, and one of their guys that used to work for them said, “How’d you like to be the ZZ Top tribute act?” They didn’t have those back then — we were one of the first ones. We said, “I don’t know. What do we get out of it?” Guy saw us at a club in Houston — he said, “How much are you making?” I think it was like $300. He said, “How’d you like to make $1,500?” We said, “We’d like that very much.”

    So I just came out here with him, with my buddy. We met a guy out here — we didn’t know anybody, and I met this one guy who [knew] my writing partner, Tom Epperson, who I came out here with — he and I wrote several scripts together; we were neighbors back home.

    He had some loose connection to this one guy here was an actor — I think he knew his mom or something. He said, “Hey, I’m in an acting class. You ought to come and try it out. Tom says you were in drama class in high school.” I said, “Yeah, but I only did that so I could maybe get a decent grade in something. And there were girls in there.” I went to the guy’s acting class, and one thing led to the next.

    Any particular takeaway you want people to get out of “Goliath”?

    I hope people start to really understand that we don’t live in a fair society. That what is legal and what is fair sometimes are two different things. I hope we get that out of it.

    Any chance we’ll see you on “Fargo” again?

    I don’t think so — I mean, unless they make it into a ghost story! If they do, I’d be happy to go back. Yeah. I love doing that, I’ve got to tell you. I had so much fun doing that show. The crew and the cast were so great. I think Noah [Hawley] wrote a terrific series.