Tag: a-bad-moms-christmas

  • How ‘Thor: Ragnarok’ Affected the Rest of the Box Office

    Are you not entertained?

    The gladiator-themed “Thor: Ragnarokwalloped the box office this weekend, debuting way above expectations with an estimated $121.0 million. The Marvel adventure boosted the box office to its biggest weekend since “Dunkirk” opened four months ago. So why isn’t the cheering from the stadium seats louder?

    Maybe because the success of “Ragnarok” doesn’t mean that the long box office slump is necessarily over. It was a good weekend if you’re a Marvel fan (or a Disney executive), but not so good for many others. The Thor-vs.-Hulk contest yielded a number of winners and losers beyond the arena, and together, they reveal a picture of a box office that’s still going to have to struggle to catch up with last year’s earnings.

    Winner: Disney. The “Ragnarok” opening means Disney owns three of the four biggest premieres of 2017 so far (along with “Beauty and the Beast” and Marvel’s “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2“). Plus, the studio still has Pixar’s “Coco” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” coming out before the end of the year. All the wailing and gnashing of teeth you hear from other studios is drowned out at the Magic Kingdom by the sound of cash registers ka-chinging.

    Winner: Marvel Cinematic Universe. Usually, threequels show signs of diminishing returns. Not at Marvel, where every “Thor” picture has opened bigger than the last. (2011’s “Thor” premiered with $65.7 million, while 2013’s “Thor: The Dark World” debuted with $85.7 million.) The same holds true of other MCU mini-franchises, including “Captain America” and “Iron Man.” Give credit to Marvel Studios for both quality control (“Ragnarok” earned a 93 percent fresh ratings from critics at Rotten Tomatoes and an A grade from paying customers at CinemaScore) and for keeping new installments fresh with unique approaches — in this case, the humorous tone of New Zealand director Taika Waititi.

    Loser: Kids. Remember when comic-book movies were dismissed as kiddie fare? No more. Only 16 percent of the “Ragnarok” audience was under 17. Viewers 25 and older made up 63 percent of the viewers. And adults were also the target audience for this weekend’s other new wide release, R-rated comedy sequel “A Bad Moms Christmas.” In fact, there wasn’t a tot-friendly movie anywhere among the top 15 releases, and nothing for the little ones to see outside the few theaters still playing “The LEGO Ninjago Movie” and “My LIttle Pony: The Movie.” Yes, it’s fall, and traditionally, it’s the time of year for grown-up movies, but it’s still rare to see a multiplex slate that so thoroughly writes off the tween-and-younger demographic.Loser: “A Bad Moms Christmas.” You can sort of see the logic here: With “Ragnarok” skewing 56 percent male, there seemed to be a vacuum for a movie that appealed to women. A sequel to last summer’s “Bad Moms” seemed just the ticket. But audiences and critics alike felt this installment was slapdash compared to the last one (the 2016 movie earned a 58 percent fresh rating at RT and an A at CinemaScore, while the new one earned a 32 percent RT score and a B grade at CinemaScore). Plus, the day after Halloween may be too soon to open a Christmas-themed movie.

    Even so, the sequel still managed to perform about as well as expected, debuting in second place with an estimated $17.0 million for the weekend and $21.6 million for the first five days. Still, “Christmas” cost $28 million to make, some $8 million more than the original. Subtract the theater owners’ cut and the cost of advertising, and the movie will have to earn at least $60 million to break even, a benchmark it’s going to have trouble reaching.

    Winner: IMAX. For “Ragnarok,” Disney is claiming the widest IMAX release ever, some 1187 venues worldwide. That includes 391 of the giant screens in America, responsible for $25.4 million of “Ragnarok”‘s domestic take. That’s a good sign for the large-screen format, but it’s also good as an indication that, when audiences recognize an event movie as a visual spectacle that deserves to be seen on a screen larger than the one in their living room, they’ll happily come to the theater to see it, even if it means coughing up premium-format surcharges.

    Loser: “LBJ.” The weekend’s only other semi-wide release (on 659 screens), the presidential biopic had a shot at breaking into the top 10, but it premiered in 14th place with just an estimated $1.1 million, or $1,727 per screen. That’s an average that indicates near-empty theaters, which was probably to be expected, since Lyndon B. Johnson remains a president less than beloved by history, and star Woody Harrelson is not a box office draw. Some pundits may have considered his “LBJ” performance a possible Oscar contender, but if the movie falls in the box office forest and doesn’t make a sound, Oscar voters won’t notice either.Winner: “Lady Bird.” Greta Gerwig‘s coming-of-age dramedy, starring Saoirse Ronan, opened on just four screens, but it averaged an estimated $93,903 on each of them, the biggest per-screen average of any movie this year. (For comparison’s sake, “Ragnarok” averaged $29,658 per screen.) Those numbers, along with a rare 100 percent fresh RT score from critics, bode well for “Lady Bird” once it expands into general release, as well as for the movie’s Oscar chances.

    Loser: The overall box office. One big weekend may not have been enough to turn the box office around. For one thing, it’s still about 8 percent behind the same weekend a year ago, which saw the premieres of Marvel’s “Doctor Strange,” kiddie hit “Trolls,” and Oscar-friendly war drama “Hacksaw Ridge,” which debuted with a combined $146.9 million. We’re not seeing that sort of deep bench this year, which is why 2017 ticket sales are still down about five percent from the same time a year ago.

  • Box Office: ‘Thor: Ragnarok’ Smashes Expectations With Huge Opening Weekend

    By Dave McNary

    LOS ANGELES, Nov 5 (Variety.com) — Disney-Marvel’s “Thor: Ragnarok” is heading for a stellar opening weekend with $121 million at 4,080 North American locations — the fourth best launch of 2017.

    The third Thor movie is also putting an emphatic end to the month-long box office slump that saw the worst October in a decade. Among 2017 titles, its debut weekend trails only “Beauty and the Beast” at $174.8 million, “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” at $146.5 million and “It” at $123.4 million.

    “Thor: Ragnarok” also officially launches the holiday season with a major bang. Moviegoing has been battered this year by a subpar second half that’s pulled down 2017 grosses by 5%, but it should rebound somewhat, thanks to “Thor: Ragnorak,” Warner Bros.-DC Entertainment’s “Justice League” (which opens Nov. 17) and Disney-Lucasfilm’s “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” (opening Dec. 15).

    “November has been a hotbed for blockbusters and is as important to any given year as even the hottest summer months and has been the launch pad for some of the biggest franchises in box office history including ‘Harry Potter,’ ‘The Hunger Games’ and ‘Twilight,’ not to mention the traditional home for James Bond,” noted Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst with comScore. “Now Thor joins the rarefied air that is the $100 million November opening club, becoming only the ninth film to ever reach this threshold and the first to do it within the first part of the month.”

    STXfilms’ R-rated “A Bad Moms Christmas,” which opened Wednesday, is heading for a respectable $21.6 million at 3,615 sites for its first five days. A24’s launch of Greta Gerwig’s “Lady Bird” posted the best platform opening of the year with $375,612 on four screens for an impressive $93,903 per-screen average.

    “Thor: Ragnarok” wound up over-performing recent estimates, which had been in the $100 million to $118 million range. The rollout includes 3,400 3D screens, 391 IMAX screens, 616 premium large format screens, and 204 D-Box locations. The IMAX total was $25.4 million.

    With Chris Hemsworth reprising the title role, “Thor: Ragnarok” will finish far above its predecessors, nearly doubling the 2011 opening of “Thor” at $65.7 million and coming in 41% above the 2013 sequel “Thor: The Dark World” at $85.7 million.

    “Thor: Ragnarok” is directed by Taika Waititi from a screenplay by Eric Pearson and the writing team of Craig Kyle and Christopher Yost. It also stars Tom Hiddleston, Cate Blanchett, Idris Elba, Jeff Goldblum, Tessa Thompson, Karl Urban, Mark Ruffalo, and Anthony Hopkins. The character of Thor, based on Norse mythology, was created in 1962 by Stan Lee, Larry Lieber, and Jack Kirby for Marvel Comics.

    “Thor: Ragnarok” has also taken in $306 million overseas, including $109 million in its international launch last week in 52% of foreign markets. It expanded to most other overseas territories this weekend.

  • Must Watch: New Movies Coming to Theaters in November 2017 (VIDEO)


    Welcome to New Release Rundown. I’m Tony Maccio from Moviefone, and we’re running down the most anticipated movies hitting theaters in November 2017.

    The month starts with the “Bad Moms” sequel “A Bad Moms Christmas,” coming to theaters, while the following Friday features the limited releases of indie darling “Lady Bird,” drama “Last Flag Flying,” biopic “LBJ” while psychological thriller “The Killing of a Sacred Dear” and Marvel’s “Thor: Ragnarok” go nationwide.

    November 10th moves along with a limited run of Martin McDonough’s “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri” and the wide releases of biographical drama “My Friend Dahmer,” novel adaptation “Murder on the Orient Express,” and comedy sequel “Daddy’s Home 2

    Dropping November 17th is the coming-of-age film “Wonder,” faith-based animated movie “The Star,” drama “Roman J. Israel, Esq” starring Denzel Washington, and DC Entertainment going “all-in” with the big-screen debut of the “Justice League.”

    The day before Thanksgiving sees the wide release of Pixar’s “Coco” as well as the limited releases of holiday film “The Man Who Invented Christmas” and drama “Darkest Hour.”

    November finishes out on the 24th with the limited release of indie-drama “Call Me by Your Name.”

    Head over to Moviefone.com to watch the trailers for all the movies we mentioned, plus search showtimes and buy tickets for a theater near you!

  • Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell Talk Lap Dances with Santa in A Bad Moms Christmas

    Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, Kathryn Hahn from A Bad Moms Christmas
    Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, Kathryn Hahn from A Bad Moms Christmas

    For the record, no young children were exposed to Santa getting a lap dance during the shooting of “A Bad Moms Christmas.”

    Once a child actress finished her scene with the jolly fat elf, she swiftly was escorted off the set “so she would have no idea,” said Kathryn Hahn.

    “And then we would dance,” said Mila Kunis.

    “We genuinely limbered up a little bit, at least I did,” said Kristen Bell. “I didn’t want to pull anything. And we just lost our marbles.”

    Added Kunis: “It got goofier and goofier.”

    The moms are back and more stressed ever, what with the holidays approaching, in this sequel to the 2016 raucous hit comedy “Bad Moms” that dared to show that mother doesn’t always know best, especially when she’s at the end of her maternal rope.

    The three stars told Made in Hollywood reporter Patrick Stinson that their on-screen comedic chemistry came naturally. “We all like each other,” said Kunis.

    “That chemistry translates,” said Bell. “And we’re telling their story. You can relate to this if you’re a mom. You could relate to this if you had a mom.”

    Kunis said, “Or if you know a mom.”

    Bell said, “It’s a story that hasn’t really been told before, like the overworked mom that’s sort of like living out her free-spirited dreams.”

    The actress said the message has been so popular that it has spawned an unofficial “Bad Mom Movement.”

    “People have just been sharing the ways in which they feel they’ve failed in an attempt to sort of shake it off and not shame themselves and laugh about it,” Bell said.

    “That’s awesome,” said Hahn.

    “And it’s created a community,” said Bell, “like a delicious connected community where people can be vulnerable and where I can say out loud: I didn’t have a bath the other night and I washed the kids in the sink with dish washing soap. That would normally be an embarrassing thing to say, but now it’s not. Yeah, you got to cut a corner or two.”

    Said Hahn: “I want to take a bath in the sink.”

    kTQy57xXVS55wAZwOsEvj2
  • ‘A Bad Moms Christmas’ Trailer Is a Raunchy Holiday Extravaganza

    Baby, it’s cold outside … but it’s hot in heerrrre for the “Bad Moms.”

    Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, and Kathryn Hahn reunite for “A Bad Moms Christmas,” the holiday-themed sequel to their raunchy hit comedy. Christmas is hard enough on the three moms, but things get a lot worse with the arrival of their own mothers.

    Kunis is trying to stand up to her perfectionist mom (Christine Baranski), while Bell’s mama (Cheryl Hines) is way too clingy. And then there’s Hahn’s mother (Susan Sarandon), who’s too busy boozin’ and cruisin’ to realize it’s not Easter.

    The trio just want to let loose and have fun for the holiday. “Let’s put the ‘ass’ back in ‘Christm-ass,’” Hahn declares. And she gets that and some more thanks to the studly Justin Hartley, who puts on a very “Magic Mike”-like show for them.

    “Bad Moms Christmas” opens in theaters November 3.

  • Kathryn Hahn Pretty Much Loved ‘I Love Dick’ Immediately

    TheWrap Presents A Screening Of 'I Love Dick' And Q&A With Kathryn HahnI Love Dick” pretty much had her by the title alone.

    Of course, the major selling point that lured Hahn to her new, provocatively titled streaming series on Amazon was the fresh opportunity to work again with executive producer Transparent.”

    Drawing from Chris Kraus’s bestselling pseudo-memoir/novel of the same name chronicling a married woman’s increasingly obsessive and consuming sexual fixation on a guru-like artist and media theorist (Kevin Bacon) who has offered her philosopher husband (Griffin Dunne) a berth in his organization, “I Love Dick” casts Hahn as Krause — or a version thereof — and gives her some of the most unique and challenging opportunities of her career, while flipping the usual male-gaze oriented narrative in terms of psycho-sexual objectification.

    Hahn joined Moviefone for a look at why she felt drawn to the material, how she navigated some of its more risqué elements, and working with an all-too-rare female-led team behind the scenes.

    Moviefone: I want to know what made this role a must-do? What was that thing that you immediately grabbed on to and said, “This is going to test me.This is going to push me”?

    Kathryn Hahn: All of it! For one, it was because it was Jill Soloway, and I always know whatever world I dove into with her is going to stretch, and challenge, and push me, and it’s going to feel the most satisfying on the drive home for sure, creatively, and intellectually.

    I was not familiar with this book before Jill handed it to me as something to consider. There was a couple things that we were thinking about book-wise, and this was one of the titles. Of course I gravitated towards just the title alone! I was very curious.

    Then I was just like flabbergasted by the material. I loved Chris Kraus’s voice so much. I just loved how loud, and fearless, and vulnerable, and hilarious, and messy, and complicated, and just relentless she was as a character, and messy. I could not wait to get in there.

    How deep into research did you go with this? Did you meet Chris? Did you try to get a little bit more info than what was in the book, or did you just work with what was available on the page?

    Sure. I did a little bit, because I knew whatever the series, how it was going to develop, after reading the pilot, the amazing pilot that our producer Sarah Gubbins wrote, I knew that it was going to depart significantly from the source material. But I also knew that I just had brilliant, literal diaries, basically, of this woman’s life.

    So “I Love Dick” is kind of what Chris Kraus would consider one of a trilogy. The other two books, there’s a book called “Aliens & Anorexia,” and another one called “Torpor.” So I read all three, which kind of just, in varying ways, describe her relationship with her marriage. That was incredibly helpful. I met with Chris a couple times, and I fell madly in love. She’s just a phenomenal human being. She came to the set, which was incredible, and kind of told us how we were doing, kind of how it really, actually went down, which was very helpful.

    It was really trippy. There was a flashback scene in which Chris was there that day, I was there playing Chris, and then another young actress was playing my younger self. So to have the three of us together in a photograph was pretty trippy.

    Was there one sort of essential turnkey element that helped you unlock it all and get where you needed to go with this role? Was there something that made you truly get it and know what you needed to do to pull it off?

    Any one of these ventures is certainly a leap of faith. I’m trying to think what the one turnkey would be, because there’s so many things I had in my head! I think I described it as being like Richard Dreyfuss in “Close Encounters.”

    Then, when we met with all the women, it was an all-female writers’ room, which was incredible, and when we met to kind of talk about experience, we talked a lot about, even there’s so many writings of nuns’ kind of deep love devotion to Christ. So, many of those things just felt like whatever that kind of obsession feeling was, I just kind of tried to tap into that — that feeling of having the entire world before this person or thing that you’re obsessed with.

    It’s like when you become obsessed, the entire world is seen through that lens — the lens that you want to share it with or for that person. So yeah, kind of just to jump into that feeling.

    When you’re playing a role like this that has a considerable sexual element, and you know you’re going to be putting yourself out there, physically, how do you prepare yourself for that aspect of it all?

    Besides, like, a wax job? [Laughs] I would say, I think there is something about it, and I was talking about this last night with Kevin Bacon, that the emotional kind of reveal certainly feels scarier, sometimes — in most things — for me.

    I don’t know what that means, but there is something about it, especially in this environment, where you know that every eyeball looking at you behind the monitor, or behind the camera, is looking at you with love, and empathy, and not judgment, where you don’t feel, for a second, self-conscious, because you know that everybody in the room is there to support this journey, whether it be nude or not, it’s the same kind of feeling. I just trusted people so profoundly, that it really wasn’t that big of a deal.

    Also, I’ve had two children, so it’s like, “Who hasn’t seen it at this point?”

    Talk to me a little bit about finding those emotional spaces with Kevin and with Griffin. You’ve got two leading men here that you have some pretty intense work to do with.

    You never know, chemistry-wise, how things are going to land. I also think, as an actor, for me, I can do as much homework as I desire, or as I want, but it’s going to change, the alchemy is going to change whenever you meet whoever that person is. You are so much who you’re playing with, I think. I really found Chris through Griffin and through Kevin, for sure. I’m sure they would say the same thing about their characters, and any actor would say that, I’m sure, about their work. You can’t work or act in a vacuum, I don’t think, unless you’re like an ’80s comedy male movie star.

    I think, mostly, it’s more fun to find yourself with who you’re acting with. So I didn’t meet Griffin until the day of the first table read, and we immediately just felt like family. He’s a phenomenal bird, just an incredible brain, and so fast, and funny, and vulnerable, and game.

    Same with Kevin. I met Kevin, I knew Kevin a little bit more because we had met randomly at a party before, and we kind of went through the Sylvere audition process together, so we got to work together while we were auditioning, trying to find our Sylvere. We walked into that first table read having known each other, having sniffed each other creatively, for quite some time. But still, there was just enough mystery, I think, to make it work.

    I think we kind of just subconsciously withheld a lot from each other, because we knew that that bubble was so profound to making this work, that alchemy and that mystery. They’re both phenomenal, phenomenal performers. I learned so much from being in scenes with them, for sure, and they made me feel brave.

    Tell me what was pleasurable about this very female-driven production. It’s rare that you get to have that many women involved in telling a woman’s story.

    Which is insane to me, you know what I mean? It should all be the people who are telling their own stories, should be the ones that are making the decisions behind about the content of the stories. It’s just insane to me. It’s like, “Oh, it’s so rare for women to be behind a woman’s story.”

    I think it’s not as rare, certainly, as it was. It seems like a very galvanizing moment in our cultural history, for sure, and there are so many things I’m dying to see that women are in front and behind, not only making the decisions, but being the creative birds in front, and all of those things.

    We had an all-women writers’ room, which was pretty profound. I think it just added, when you know that you are the subject, and not the object, it makes the kind of work that we were being asked to do just that much safer, because you just know that there’s empathy and agency from behind the camera. You just don’t feel that weird handwringing judgement, or just someone that doesn’t quite know, or thinks knows. It just felt that much safer.

    They’re all really funny humans, too. All of them are deeply funny, which I was very buoyed by. Even in the reading of the book, I remember thinking, God, this is hilarious. It’s so hilarious because it’s so cringe-worthy. You’re just so embarrassed for this person who has no embarrassment herself. I feel like the women in that writers’ room are very giddy to dig into that.

    I was talking to your friend Kristen Bell about the genius of setting the second “Bad Moms” film at Christmas time. Tell me what you responded to when that idea was floated your way.

    We’d been all kind of sniffing about a sequel for a while, because we were like, “Come on!” because we were so excited about the success of the first one. Then, when we heard that it was going to be holiday theme, I was so excited. There’s no other time of the year that I feel like a mom would deserve and need to get the hell out of the house. There’s so much!

    I remember as a kid tearing open the Christmas presents so fast. We barely opened the presents from Santa, and my mom was already sweating in the kitchen trying to put bacon and eggs on. There’s no moment to savor the magic you’re creating for everybody else. So I’m really excited for the moms to get a chance to go out and have some mulled wine and enjoy a night out.

    “I Love Dick” streams on Amazon May 12th.