Category: Reviews

  • ‘The Craft’ Is a Wicked ’90s Time Capsule That’ll Make You Hate Los Angeles: Podcast

    THE CRAFT“We are those ‘The Craft‘-loving weirdos, mister.” Well, half of us are, the other half want to invoke Manon and get back the hour and 40 minutes spent watching the movie.

    Tim picked the (apparently divisive) ’90s teen witch thriller, which stars perhaps the most ’90s cast ever assembled: Robin Tunney, Neve Campbell, Fairuza Balk, Rachel True, and Skeet Ulrich. Topics discussed include obvious wigs, Catholic schools with no rules, terrible special effects, terrible parents, Breckin Meyer‘s stellar douche acting, and the hell-on-Earth that is Los Angeles. (Seriously, there are a lot of trash fires and snake-loving ne’er-do-wells in this movie’s version of L.A.)

    Next week’s movie, “John Carter,” comes courtesy of special guest Drew Taylor, who will somehow try to convince us that watching a loincloth-clad Taylor Kitsch learn how to battle aliens in low gravity for two hours and 12 minutes is time well spent.

    Listen to CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast Episode 16: ‘The Craft’Total runtime: 54:02

    Subscribe to the CAN’T WAIT! podcast:

    Have thoughts/feelings/feedback about the podcast? Have a movie you really, really want us to watch and talk about? Hit us up on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram with the hashtag #CANTWAIT.

    CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast by Moviefone celebrates Hollywood’s guiltiest pleasures by taking a fresh look at critically ignored movies and giving them a second chance at life. Join Moviefone editors Tim Hayne, Rachel Horner, Phil Pirrello, and Tony Maccio as they extol the virtues and expose the failings (with love!) of nostalgic movies.

  • ‘Timecop’ Is a 98-Minute High Kick to the Face: Podcast

    TIMECOP“Where we’re going, we don’t need scientific accuracy,” is a line someone should have uttered in the subject of this week’s podcast, 1994’s “Timecop,” a movie that explains time travel by way of Jean-Claude Van Damme‘s mullet and windowless cars that resemble fast-moving garbage.

    1099

    Yes, we’re tackling Tony’s pick, and by “tackling” we mean “beating to a bloody pulp.” Among the topics discussed are: the JCVD school of acting, jokes that aren’t jokes, unsettling nudity, high kicks & high splits, and how “Timecop” — despite all its shortcomings — somehow managed to predict a Trump presidency. (Why isn’t that last point making headlines?! Oh, right. Because this movie is terrible.)

    Tune in next week for Tim’s pick, ’90s teen witch revenge drama “The Craft,” starring Robin Tunney, Fairuza Balk, Neve Campbell, Rachel True, Skeet Ulrich, and all the candles available within the greater Los Angeles area.

    Subscribe to the CAN’T WAIT! podcast:

    Have thoughts/feelings/feedback about the podcast? Have a movie you really, really want us to watch and talk about? Hit us up on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram with the hashtag #CANTWAIT.

    CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast by Moviefone celebrates Hollywood’s guiltiest pleasures by taking a fresh look at critically ignored movies and giving them a second chance at life. Join Moviefone editors Tim Hayne, Rachel Horner, Phil Pirrello, and Tony Maccio as they extol the virtues and expose the failings (with love!) of nostalgic movies.

  • The Confusing AF Circus Party of ‘Two Weeks Notice’: Podcast

    TWO WEEKS NOTICEIs it “Two Weeks Notice” or “Two Weeks’ Notice”? When you live in a world of oblivious billionaires and binge-eating activist lawyers, who cares?!

    This week, we watched the Sandra Bullock / Hugh Grant rom-com, “Two Weeks Notice.” Sure, the title is technically missing an apostrophe, but nothing is missing from the undeniable chemistry between the movie’s stars. Among other topics discussed: too much Chinese food, diarrhea theme songs, mystery characters, and confusing AF circus parties. Maybe one day all the questions we have about this movie will be answered by its inevitable, completely unnecessary straight-to-Netflix sequel.

    Tune in next week for Tony’s pick: the 5% scientifically accurate “Timecop,” starring Jean-Claude Van Damme, Mia Sara, and Ron Silver.

    Listen to CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast Episode 14: ‘Two Weeks Notice’Total runtime: 55:27

    Subscribe to the CAN’T WAIT! podcast:

    Have thoughts/feelings/feedback about the podcast? Have a movie you really, really want us to watch and talk about? Hit us up on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram with the hashtag #CANTWAIT.

    CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast by Moviefone celebrates Hollywood’s guiltiest pleasures by taking a fresh look at critically ignored movies and giving them a second chance at life. Join Moviefone editors Tim Hayne, Rachel Horner, Phil Pirrello, and Tony Maccio as they extol the virtues and expose the failings (with love!) of nostalgic movies.

  • The Scariest Part of ‘Armageddon’ Isn’t the Asteroid: Podcast

    Armageddon podcastYou won’t want to close your eyes. You won’t want to fall asleep. ‘Cause we’re talking about “Armageddon,” and you won’t want to miss a thing.

    This week, the CAN’T WAIT! crew (Tim Hayne, Rachel Horner, Phil Pirrello, and Tony Maccio) tackles the 1998 Michael Bay disasterpiece, drilling down to its core like its a Texas-sized asteroid on a collision course with Earth. Among the topics discussed: Bay’s penchant for trailer-made movies, a Michael Bay shared cinematic universe, and the problems inherent to giving screen time to an ensemble cast of roughly 500 people. Also, Tony Gilroy and J.J. Abrams were involved in the making of this movie, which raises A LOT of questions.

    Tune in next week for Rachel’s pick, “Two Weeks Notice,” in which Hugh Grant is charmingly befuddled and Sandra Bullock has diarrhea.

    Listen to CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast Episode 13: ‘Armageddon’Total runtime: 65:28

    Subscribe to the CAN’T WAIT! podcast:

    Have thoughts/feelings/feedback about the podcast? Have a movie you really, really want us to watch and talk about? Hit us up on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram with the hashtag #CANTWAIT.

  • 7 Things You Need to Know Before You See ‘The LEGO Batman Movie’

    The LEGO Batman MovieThis weekend, “The LEGO Batman Movie,” a spin-off of 2014’s masterful “The LEGO Movie,” opens in theaters everywhere (get your tickets now!). This time, everyone’s favorite caped crusader (once again voiced, with gravelly rage, by Will Arnett) is made the main character, and his relationship with a young Robin (Michael Cera), newly minted police commissioner Barbara Gordon (Rosario Dawson) and, of course, his arch-nemesis The Joker (Zach Galifianakis), is explored in hilarious depth.

    But what else do you need to know about the latest, brick-filled Batman adventure? Read on to find out!

    1. It’s a Great Batman Movie …

    The first thing that you need to know is that this is a great Batman movie. Like, probably the best Batman movie since “The Dark Knight,” which is saying something, and the best animated Batman movie since “Batman: Mask of the Phantasm” (and that was back in 1993). It features a number of his most famous villains (there’s an ongoing gag about Batman’s lack of commitment to the Joker that is pretty priceless) and there is real care and attention given to crafting the character that fans will not only understand but celebrate. He’s given emotional depth and develops fully as the movie goes along. This isn’t one of those animated movies that is just a series of jokes; there’s a real story here and real characters and they’re all perfectly Batman-y.

    2. … And a Great LEGO Movie

    One of the questions I had was: well, how is this a LEGO Batman movie? And, well, you’ll see. I don’t want to give anything away because a lot of what happens in the movie, particularly in its second half, hasn’t even been hinted at in the marketing materials for the film. But just know that if you loved the way “The LEGO Movie” playfully mixed IP with an original story about what it takes to be a “master builder” (a term that is reiterated here), then you are going to love “The LEGO Batman Movie.”

    3. There Are a Thousand Easter Eggs (Seriously)

    About two minutes into “The LEGO Batman Movie,” there’s a scene where Batman is flying through the streets of Gotham and there are so many Easter eggs, hidden references, and old-school shout-outs flying by that I could barely keep up. I tried to write a few down (I got as far as a reference to Shreck’s Department Store from “Batman Returns”) before giving up. And that was the tip of the iceberg. If you’re a Batman superfan, your mind is going to be spinning. There are references to every filmed Batman adventure since the old black-and-white serials–and that’s just the beginning.

    4. It’s Not Afraid to Poke Fun at the DC Cinematic Universe

    One of the more surprising aspects of “The LEGO Batman Movie” is that it openly mocks the self-seriousness of the so-called DC Extended Universe, the small cluster of mostly iffy films that have been based on DC Comics properties and exist in the same shared universe. At one point, The Joker asks Batman who his arch-nemesis really is, and Batman responds, “Superman,” a reference to last year’s poorly (critically) received “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” (one of a handful of nods to that particular film). There are also at least two digs at “Suicide Squad,” the all-villains romp that was released last summer (to a response similar to that of “Batman v. Superman”), and generally “The LEGO Batman Movie” seems to fly in the face of the current crop of DC movies. It’s everything these movies are not — full of heart, funny as hell, and unafraid to be super entertaining without being overwrought or gloomy. Even the score seems to heavily evoke the Christopher Nolan-directed Batman movies. It’s been a long while since Batman was this fun.

    5. Oddly, Wyldstyle Is Never Referenced

    So here’s something that’s kind of strange … the movie is about Batman’s reluctance to start a family or engage emotionally with other people. But, in “The LEGO Movie,” he’s seen dating Wyldstyle (played by Elizabeth Banks). This seems to fly in the face of everything the movie is trying so hard to establish. If he really is an antisocial loner, would he really have dated someone that seriously and agreed to go on a series of adventures in the way that he did in the previous film? Also, why aren’t any of those characters around? If this is a shared LEGO-filled universe, shouldn’t there be some crossover of some kind. Like, something? What if Emmett just walked by in the background? No? Maybe next time?

    6. It’s Not Quite as Good as ‘The LEGO Movie’

    Just know this: there was something almost transcendent about “The LEGO Movie.” Maybe because it seemed, from the outset, like an incredibly crass cash-grab, so the fact that it was a really great movie was a huge surprise. But more than that, “The LEGO Movie” had to do with corporatization, organized religion, and millennial ennui in a way that was really refreshing and fun. Know that “The LEGO Batman Movie” doesn’t have that much on its mind. Which is OK. It’s still a total blast and will pull on your heartstrings more than once. But you probably won’t walk out of the theater thinking it’s the kind of kicky subversive joy “The LEGO Movie” was.

    7. You’ll Want Additional Brick-Based Batman Movies

    One of the holdovers from “The LEGO Movie” is the bickering relationship between Superman and Green Lantern (played, once more, by Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill), suggesting a larger DC LEGO movie universe. And by the end of “The LEGO Movie,” you feel like the story is just gearing up. So yes, if this is a hit, you can probably expect some additional LEGO Batman adventures and guess what? You’ll be ready for them, too.

    “The LEGO Batman Movie” is in theaters everywhere now.

  • ‘The Secret Life of Pets’ Family Review: 4 Things Every Parent Should Know

    the secret life of pets family reviewThe Secret Life of Pets” is an animated buddy comedy adventure following the story of a New York City dog Max (Louis C.K.), who has it good with his human Katie (Ellie Kemper) until she brings home a big, shaggy rescue dog, Duke (Eric Stonestreet). Their jealous rivalry leads to a disastrous encounter that leaves them collar-less and in the company of a gang of stray animals, led by maniacal rabbit Snowball (Kevin Hart), who plan to take down humans.

    Here are four issues to consider before taking your kids to see “The Secret Life of Pets.”

    1. How easily do your kids get scared?
    For a PG-rated animated movie, there are several frightening sequences, close calls, and even a pretty gruesome animal death in “The Secret Life of Pets.” Common Sense Media rates it as OK for kids 6 & up but cautions about the dangerous life-and-death situations the animals find themselves in time and time again. Roger Moore of Movie Nation even mentioned the frightening scenes in his review: “I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention how violent this pre-tween farce is. Slapfights, brawls, violent death and near-death experiences abound.”

    2. Is your kid an animal person?
    Young children who adore talking animal comedies (“Zootopia,” “Finding Dory,” “Finding Nemo,” “Ice Age,” etc.) will be the first ones to clamor for a family matinee outing, but they should be prepped for the fact that not all of the animals in this movie are good, sweet, or kind. The gang of “flushed pets” are, like the thrown-out toys in “Toy Story 3,” bitter about not having human companions and seek vengeance against human kind for the injustices they’ve dealt with as human-less pets.

    3. Who will enjoy the movie most?
    “The Secret Life of Pets” is ideal for families with kids who are used to animated adventures, understand that most family-friendly films have happy endings and, of course, love anthropomorphized animals. Preschoolers may find themselves needing parental comfort during some of the chase scenes and the perilous moments when it seems like a few of the main characters are going to die. For that reason, it’s best for elementary-schoolers and up, but sensitive older kids may also be occasionally (albeit temporarily) frightened.

    4. What are critics saying about “The Secret Life of Pets”?
    Ratings and reviews for “The Secret Life of Pets” are generally positive with a “fresh” Tomatometer score of 83 and a favorable 65 on Metacritic. The positive reviews rave: “The animation is wonderful, leading to plenty of colorful visual gags and over-the-top situations,” says Britton Peele of The Dallas Morning News, even while acknowledging the “predictable” nature of the movie: “‘Secret Life’ anchors itself on an oh-so-familiar concept but sparkles most when imagining some of its crazier shenanigans.” The critical reviews note the lack of emotional investment required: “‘fun and games’ is all you get, and the lack of meaningful connective tissue between the antics means the film begins to flag far earlier than it should,” says Robbie Collin of The Telegraph.

    “The Secret Life of Pets” hits theaters July 8th.

  • ‘Alice Through the Looking Glass’ Family Review: 5 Things Every Parent Should Know

    Alice (Mia Wasikowska) returns to the whimsical world of Underland to help the Hatter (Johnny Depp) in Disney's ALICE THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS, an all-new adventure featuring the unforgettable characters from Lewis Carroll's beloved stories.Alice Through the Looking Glass” is the sequel to Tim Burton‘s 2010 “Alice in Wonderland,” starring several of the same stars (Mia Wasikowska, Johnny Depp, Anne Hathaway, and Helena Bonham Carter) reprising their roles — but without Burton at the helm. Joining the fantasy world of “Underland” is Sacha Baron Cohen as the personification of Time, and, in the new story, Alice is fleeing not an ill-fated engagement and the loss of her independence as a sea captain traveling the world.

    Here are five issues to consider before taking your kids to see Disney’s “Alice Through the Looking Glass.”
    Alice (Mia Wasikowska) returns to the whimsical world of Underland and travels back in time to save the Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) in Disney's ALICE THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS, an all-new adventure featuring the unforgettable characters from Lewis Carroll's beloved stories.1. How comfortable are they with live-action fantasy?
    Although there were a startling number of pre-schoolers and toddlers at a recent promotional screening of “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” this James Bobin-directed sequel isn’t an ideal first live-action movie or even an appropriate fantasy adventure for kids that young. The story is dark and features potentially upsetting themes about death, loss, grief, and dysfunctional family relationships.
    2. How easily do your kids get scared?
    Although there’s less violence in this installment versus the previous one, there are still scenes of fantasy peril and tense, near-death sequences that could scare your young child. The movie is PG but not G, and therefore expect a few scenes where characters look like they might die and in one case like the entire Underland may be destroyed. There are also emotional, distressing moments when characters say goodbye, seemingly forever. At the screening I attended, some young children were audibly crying at one point, unaware that the movie was unlikely to end in such a sad place.
    3. Do you want kids to read it then see it?
    Those who haven’t read Lewis Carroll’s “Alice in Wonderland” books may not pick up on how this film overlaps or diverges from the source material, but generally it’s better for young readers and viewers to experience an original story before the adaptation. If you feel strongly that kids shouldn’t see an adaptation until they’ve read the book first, take that into consideration before deciding to see the movie, but keep in mind that the movie is a really loose adaptation.
    4. Who will enjoy the movie most?
    Kids and teens who love the “Alice in Wonderland” books and the various adaptations will enjoy the movie most, unless they’re purists about the source material, in which case they’re likely to balk at all the creative differences between the new movie and the 1871 “Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There.” Because of the occasional scares and mature themes, age-wise it’s best for kids 8 and up.
    5. What are critics saying about ‘Alice’?
    Ratings and reviews for “Alice Through the Looking Glass” are mixed to negative, with a “rotten” Tomatometer score of 30 and an unfavorable 37 on Metacritic. The more positive reviews praising the film think it’s great for kids: “There is a pleasurable zip and zing to ‘Through the Looking Glass’ that marks it out as fine escapist fare for children,” says Leigh Paatsch of Australia’s Herald Sun. The more critical reviews think it barely resembles Carroll’s tale: “What does all this have to do with Lewis Carroll? Hardly anything. It’s just an excuse on which to hang two trite overbearing fables and one amusing one,” says Stephen Holden of The New York Times.

    “Alice Through the Looking Glass” opens in theaters nationwide May 20th, 2016.

  • ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ Opens to 97 Percent Rating on Rotten Tomatoes


    With great hype comes great responsibility, and it looks like “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” is living up to its end of the bargain.

    Early reviews are in for “Episode VII” — which comes out in two days — and they are very, very positive. At the moment, “Rotten Tomatoes” is trending on Twitter because fans are rocking back and forth in excitement about the movie’s current 97 percent certified fresh rating, based on 110 “fresh” reviews and three “rotten.” (Question: Do we just assume the three are trolls fishing for attention or give them the benefit of the doubt?”) That rating could and probably will change very quickly, but for now it is thrilling fanboys and fangirls to tears.


    Yes. These are the scores we’re looking for. Not only do the critics (so far) seem to think “The Force Awakens” is better than the prequels — an admittedly low bar — they seem sweet on the movie on its own.

    Here are just a few of the fresh reviews:

    • “Thrilling, exciting and dazzling with a heartbeat underneath. Star Wars: The Force Awakens delivers everything you want in a Star Wars movie. It’s worth waiting in line for, and lives up to the hype.”
    Avi Offer
    NYC Movie Guru

    • “A Star Wars film by fans and for fans.”
    Chris Bumbray
    JoBlo’s Movie Emporium

    • “Star Wars has come roaring and soaring back with a fabulous, bountiful, richly rewarding payoff for anyone who’s been waiting, patiently or otherwise.”
    Neil Pond
    Parade Magazine

    • “Harrison Ford and Peter Mayhew, playing Han Solo and Chewbacca, are flat out terrific delivering one-liners, slap-stick, and heart, which transcends mere nostalgia.”
    Jonathan W. Hickman
    Daily Film Fix

    • “What Abrams has done is find and return the ingredient crucial to the original three films in the franchise that was sorely lacking in the second round: fun.”
    Bill Goodykoontz
    Arizona Republic

    • “A triumphant return to form for the franchise – the best of the films since The Empire Strikes Back…It’s also a rousing introduction to new characters who will likely carry this world forward through two more planned episodes and assorted spinoffs.”
    Cary Darling
    Fort Worth Star-Telegram/DFW.com

    And here’s one of the rotten reviews:

    • “[Abrams ] has made an adoring copy of Star Wars, seeking to correct its perceived flaws, without understanding that nothing about that movie’s context or meaning or enormous cultural impact can be duplicated.”
    Andrew O’Hehir
    Salon.com

    That guy’s lack of faith is disturbing, and he’s probably going to take some heat, but it is good to hear both sides. And, for all we know, many fans may agree with that perspective. With so much hype, there’s a lot of room for disappointment. Time will tell.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

    %Slideshow-347367%

  • Movie Review – ’99 Homes’

    99 Homes,” starring Andrew Garfield, Michael Shannon, and Laura Dern, is one thriller of a movie.

    Based on true events about the home foreclosure crisis, this movie will have your blood boiling and you gripping the arm rest in anger knowing people really were losing their homes left and right — and given only minutes to vacate them.

    20062394

    “99 Homes” centers on a greedy, heat-packing real estate broker (Shannon) who makes money by evicting people from their foreclosed homes. He shows up with sheriff’s deputies and a lock smith, and gives people two minutes to pack up all their worldly possessions and get out. Most people are stunned and still on the phone with their lawyers or their banks, trying to modify their home loans but to no avail. One of his evicted victims, Garfield’s Dennis Nash, is jobless and so desperate that he goes to work for the man who evicted him and starts making money doing the same dirty deed to others. Together they steal, pillage, and forge legal documents to make more and more money evicting hard-working people. Eventually, Garfield’s conscience catches up with him.

    “99 Homes” was written and directed by Ramin Bahrani, who also directed “Good Bye Solo” and “Man Push Cart.” While you’ve likely never heard of those movies, “Homes” will have you hooked by the trailer and talking about it days after you leave the theater. In 2009, legendary film critic Rodger Ebert declared Bahrani “the new great American director,” and this movie shows that he’s earned that title.

    Everyone should see “99 Homes,” if not for the amazing filmmaking then to better learn how banks caused the housing market crash that devastated so many Americans, and the greed and profiteering that followed.

    Wendell Escott is a student at El Camino Community College and a contributor to Moviefone’s Campus Beat.

  • Matt Damon’s ‘The Martian’ Movie Review

    Last Friday night, local movie theaters were packed in anticipation for the space-thriller showing of Matt Damon‘s new film, “The Martian.” The buzz was ridiculous. Regardless of the hype, I was planning on seeing the film. Who would I be kidding if I didn’t see such a star-studded film that included Matt Damon, Jessica Chastain, Kristen Wiig, and Jeff Daniels? I know, with a cast of that magnitude its got to be a must watch… but no.

    Sorry to disappoint.

    The Ridley Scott-directed “The Martian,” based on Andy Weir’s best-selling novel of the same name, follows astronaut Mark Watney as he struggles to survive when left behind on Mars.

    The film fares well initially, with drama and a good build up. The protagonist’s wit and charm via Damon is welcoming. However, with all of those ingredients, by the time the end credits roll, there’s no satisfaction.

    A big frustration from the Drew Goddard-penned film is the lack of strong setbacks. There are no moments that will have you on the edge of your seat like “Interstellar” and “Gravity.”​ The only real obstacle is the premise of the film, which is getting Watney back home. Each hurdle he faces is predictable.

    There’s really not much character development other than Watney’s. We’re given bits and pieces, but not enough. The biggest frustration is the mysterious love-relationship between Kate Mara’s character Beth Johanssen and Sebastian Stan’s Chris Beck. The only attention brought to this is a goodbye wave and a kiss on Beck’s helmet, which is so frustrating because there is little-to-no additional insight into their lives.

    There’s buzz surrounding a potential Best Picture nomination for this film, and I’m not sure I totally agree. Watching “The Martian” was like going up on the most feared, deadly rollercoaster of all time and finding out there’s no drop.

    Khalid Moalim is a student at Ohio State University and a contributor to Moviefone’s Campus Beat.