Category: Columns

  • ‘Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’: Crucial Elements

    'The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping' is scheduled for release on November 20, 2026. Photo: Lionsgate.
    ‘The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’ is scheduled for release on November 20, 2026. Photo: Lionsgate.

    Preview: 

    • The movie adaptation of ‘Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’ is scheduled to release on November 20th, 2026. 
    • There are a few crucial elements that the film needs to get right in order for the movie to work. 
    • The casting choices are brilliant, which is a step in the right direction.

    Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping‘ is currently filming with an incredible cast and will be hitting theaters on November 20th, 2026. Having read the book that the movie is based on, there are a few crucial elements that it needs to get right to make the fans happy and for the film to have a better chance at success.

    jUm2ZH4QNmPrG3GZkpJ9D6

    ‘Sunrise on the Reaping’ tells the story of Haymitch Abernathy. Woody Harrelson portrays Haymitch in the original films, but this time around, fans get to learn more about his time in the Hunger Games and how that shaped the man he became. Joseph Zada is playing Haymitch in the new film. Having seen him in ‘We Were Liars‘ there is no doubt that he is the right man for the job.

    Related Article: Glenn Close and Billy Porter Joining New ‘Hunger Games’ Prequel Movie

    ‘Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’ Cannot Be Overly Predictable

    Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson and Jennifer Lawrence in 'The Hunger Games'.
    (L to R) Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson and Jennifer Lawrence in ‘The Hunger Games’. Photo: Lionsgate.

    Most people who watch ‘Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’ will know Woody Harrelson’s version of Haymitch already. While we never fully explored his background and what it was like for him in the games, we know it did a number on him as he hates to talk about it and is almost always seen with a drink in his hand.

    Viewers also already know that he wins the 50th Hunger Games. This means that it will be obvious from the start that all the other children who enter the games die, and that Haymitch is never truly in danger of being killed. This is a slippery slope, as it means things can feel a bit predictable.

    The book explores the story in a way that keeps readers on the edge of their seats, wondering who will die next and how. Even with the outcome of Haymitch’s story being known, it is exciting and entertaining to follow his journey. This is something the movie also needs to accomplish. It will not be easy, but with a great cast and carefully placed suspense and action, the odds will be ever in its favor.

    Haymitch and Lenore Dove Need To Have Unmatched Chemistry

    (Left) Joseph Zada to star as Haymitch Abernathy in 'The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping'. Photo credit: Hugh Stewart. (Right) Whitney Peak to star as Lenore Dove Bard in 'The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping'. Photo: Kate Whyte.
    (Left) Joseph Zada to star as Haymitch Abernathy in ‘The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’. Photo credit: Hugh Stewart. (Right) Whitney Peak to star as Lenore Dove Bard in ‘The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’. Photo: Kate Whyte.

    Probably the most important aspect that the movie has to get right, is the chemistry between Haymitch and Lenora Dove (who is being played by Whitney Peak). It has to be unmatched. Their love is a key part of the story and if it is not believable, the movie simply will not work.

    Without audiences becoming fully invested in their relationship, things will fall apart and the movie will never reach its full potential. It has to be obvious that these two are soulmates, and that they would do absolutely anything for one another.

    The book has been very well received, which is half the battle. So if Lionsgate is able to accomplish both of these things, it is the perfect set up for success.

    'The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping' opens in theaters on November 20, 2026.
    ‘The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping’ opens in theaters on November 20, 2026.

    Other Movies in ‘The Hunger Games’ Franchise:

    Buy ‘The Hunger Games’ Movies On Amazon

    Cz6dmiOg
  • Early ‘Superman’ Home Release Makes Sense For ‘Peacemaker’

    David Corenswet as Superman and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.
    David Corenswet as Superman and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.

    Preview: 

    • ‘Superman’ had its home release only one month after its theatrical release, which seems very early for a big comic book movie.
    • After the events of ‘Peacemaker’ Season 2, this makes sense. 
    • Fans who missed ‘Superman’ in theaters will want to watch it since it has ties to the second season of ‘Peacemaker’.

    When the home release date of ‘Superman‘ was first released, many people felt it was way too soon. Not only is the movie still playing in theaters, it is still bringing in money. A home release date of August 15th is just 35 days after its theatrical release. This is quick for any movie, but for a comic book movie? It is almost unheard of.

    tj0MlYZpL4B5pcVJfoIJe1

    Then, after watching the first episode of ‘Peacemaker‘, it became instantly clear why DC Studios did this. The events of ‘Superman’ tie into key plot points of this season and while it is not required viewing, it certainly helps with the storytelling.

    Related Article: James Gunn’s ‘Superman’ Tops the Box Office Again as ‘Smurfs’ Stumbles

    ‘Peacemaker’ Makes Changes To Season 1 To Fit Into The DCU

    (L to R) Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl and Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.
    (L to R) Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl and Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.

    At the end of ‘Peacemaker’ Season 1, fans lost their minds when the Justice League showed up. Now that the DCEU has gone the way of the buffalo, and the DCU is the new canon, James Gunn needed to correct a few things. To no one’s surprise, he did so brilliantly, proving what a mastermind he is.

    ‘Peacemaker’ Season 2 starts off with a “Previously On” however, it highlights that it is the DCU, not the DCEU. Because of this some events are slightly altered, with the major one being that instead of the Justice League showing up, it is the Justice Gang, who are prominently featured in ‘Superman’. This includes Nathan Fillion (Guy Gardener), Isabela Mercad (Hawkgirl), and Edi Gathegi (Mister Terrific).

    ‘Superman’ Events Are Referenced Multiple Times In ‘Peacemaker’ Season 2

    (L to R) John Cena and Danielle Brooks in 'Peacemaker' season 2. Photo: Curtis Bonds Baker/Max.
    (L to R) John Cena and Danielle Brooks in ‘Peacemaker’ season 2. Photo: Curtis Bonds Baker/Max.

    Also in the premiere episode of ‘Peacemaker’ Season 2 is an interview between Christopher Smith (John Cena), also known as Peacemaker, and the Justice Gang, which he hopes to join. While Mr. Terrific is absent, Hawk Girl, Guy Gardener, and Maxwell Lord (Sean Gunn) are present. They mostly poke fun at Peacemaker, delivering a hilarious scene.

    There are also several times in this episode (and later in the season) that the “Luther event” is mentioned. This is, of course, in reference to the pocket universe that Lex Luther (Nicholas Hoult) opened up, nearly destroying Metropolis in the process. Frank Grillo also reprises his role as Rick Flag Sr., who is acting director or A.R.G.U.S. while Amanda Waller is being investigated.

    Early Home Release For ‘Superman’ Just Makes Sense Now

    Frank Grillo in 'Peacemaker' season 2. Photo: Jessica Miglio/Max.
    Frank Grillo in ‘Peacemaker’ season 2. Photo: Jessica Miglio/Max.

    With all of these ties to James Gunn’s ‘Superman’, it makes sense why DC Studios opted to give it a home release. As mentioned, it is not necessary to watch it in order to understand what it happening in ‘Peacemaker’ Season 2, but it will give you more insight into why A.R.G.U.S. is so afraid of dimensional rifts.

    Also, because the Justice Gang is in the series, although not often, seeing ‘Superman’ allows viewers to get to know them and their dynamic a little bit more, rather than being thrust into the chaotic conversation that is going on during Peacemaker’s interview without any backstory.

    The best part? If you so wish, you can still see ‘Superman’ in theaters, as it is still playing.

    David Corenswet as Superman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.
    David Corenswet as Superman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.

    List of Movies and TV Shows Featuring Superman:

    Buy Tickets: ‘Superman’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy Superman Movies On Amazon

    Bpj7G4CK
  • Recasting Zuckerberg For ‘The Social Network 2’ Is Not Smart

    (Left) Jeremy Strong arrives on the red carpet of the 97th Oscars® at the Dolby® Theatre at Ovation Hollywood on Sunday, March 2, 2025. Credit/Provider: Etienne Laurent / The Academy. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S. (Right) Jesse Eisenberg in 'The Social Network'. Photo: Sony Pictures Releasing.
    (Left) Jeremy Strong arrives on the red carpet of the 97th Oscars® at the Dolby® Theatre at Ovation Hollywood on Sunday, March 2, 2025. Credit/Provider: Etienne Laurent / The Academy. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S. (Right) Jesse Eisenberg in ‘The Social Network’. Photo: Sony Pictures Releasing.

    Preview: 

    • Jeremy Strong is being eyed to join ‘The Social Network 2’ as Mark Zuckerberg, replacing Jesse Eisenberg.
    • Both actors are very talented, but with Jesse Eisenberg still acting, this would make no sense.
    • Replacing the main character’s actor will likely hurt the film in the long run.

    The Social Network‘ is considered one of Aaron Sorkin‘s best films, which says a lot because he has made some great ones. The movie follows the birth of Facebook, and works perfectly as a stand-alone. Some would argue there is no need for a follow-up; however, with the way that social media has grown over the years, it comes as no surprise that Sorkin wants to explore it further.

    1413499

    The casting surrounding the film is what is turning heads. News of replacing Jesse Eisenberg, who is the perfect Mark Zuckerberg, is shocking enough, but hearing that Jeremy Strong is the frontrunner for the role does not make a lot of sense. He is a great actor, we all know this, and he can pull off the billionaire businessman wonderfully, as seen in ‘Succession‘, but he doesn’t give off Zuckerberg vibes at all.

    Related Article: Mikey Madison & Jeremy Allen White Circle ‘The Social Network Part II’

    Jeremy Strong Is A Great Actor, But This Is Bad Casting

    Jeremy Strong as Roy Cohn in 'The Apprentice'. Photo: Briarcliff Entertainment.
    Jeremy Strong as Roy Cohn in ‘The Apprentice’. Photo: Briarcliff Entertainment.

    Jeremy Strong has some serious acting chops. He is able to get intense and downright scary when he needs to, but can also channel a more vulnerable side when the script calls for it. That said, casting him as Mark Zuckerberg makes no sense to me, and I don’t think I am alone in that.

    Zuckerberg is more of a geeky, tech guy, something that Jesse Eisenberg perfectly embodied in ‘The Social Network’. I am unsure that Jeremy Strong would be able to bring him to life on the screen in a way that feels authentic and genuine.

    Why Can’t Jesse Eisenberg Reprise The Role? 

    Jesse Eisenberg arrives on the red carpet of the 97th Oscars® at the Dolby® Theatre at Ovation Hollywood on Sunday, March 2, 2025. Credit/Provider: Etienne Laurent / The Academy. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S.
    Jesse Eisenberg arrives on the red carpet of the 97th Oscars® at the Dolby® Theatre at Ovation Hollywood on Sunday, March 2, 2025. Credit/Provider: Etienne Laurent / The Academy. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S.

    With Jesse Eisenberg still acting, it seems to make no sense to replace him for the sequel, unless it was his decision. Perhaps there is more going on behind the scenes than we know. He is writing and directing now as well, having a lot of success with ‘A Real Pain‘ and is returning to the ‘Now You See Me‘ franchise, but I just don’t understand Aaron Sorkin’s decision to move forward to this project without him.

    Will Recasting Hurt The Performance Of ‘The Social Network 2’?

    Jesse Eisenberg in 'The Social Network'. Photo: Sony Pictures Releasing.
    Jesse Eisenberg in ‘The Social Network’. Photo: Sony Pictures Releasing.

    Recasting the main actor of a franchise is almost never a good idea. Sometimes there are extenuating circumstances, but with Jesse Eisenberg still acting, and still nailing his performances, it does not make any sense to replace him in ‘The Social Network 2’. If necessary, Aaron Sorkin should wait until his schedule clears up so that he can reprise his role as Mark Zuckerberg.

    Mikey Madison and Jeremy Allen White are also being eyed to join the cast, however we do not yet know which roles will be offered to them. Hopefully they are not replacing actors that appeared in the first film as well.

    Aaron Sorkin attends the Academy’s 7th Annual Governors Awards in The Ray Dolby Ballroom at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, CA, on Saturday, November 14, 2015. Credit/Provider: Matt Petit / ©A.M.P.A.S. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S.
    Aaron Sorkin attends the Academy’s 7th Annual Governors Awards in The Ray Dolby Ballroom at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, CA, on Saturday, November 14, 2015. Credit/Provider: Matt Petit / ©A.M.P.A.S. Copyright: ©A.M.P.A.S.

    List of Aaron Sorkin Movies and TV Shows:

    Buy Aaron Sorkin Movies on Amazon

    a3V2YLgg
  • ‘Supergirl’ Could Take Place At The Same Time As ‘Superman’

    Milly Alcock on the set of 'Supergirl'. Photo: James Gunn's Instagram account.
    Milly Alcock on the set of ‘Supergirl’. Photo: James Gunn’s Instagram account.

    Preview: 

    • Kara Zor-El, also known as Supergirl, enters the Fortress of Solitude at the end of ‘Superman’ to pick up her dog, Krypto, whom Kal-El was watching for her.
    • With ‘Supergirl’ releasing in 2026, her movie may show fans where she was while Kal-El was watching Krypto.
    • Knowing the movie will follow the events of the graphic novel ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow’, however, this is likely the beginning of her story.

    DC Studios co-CEO has a way with teasing upcoming projects without shoving them down viewers’ throats, which is why it came as no surprise to most when Kal-El’s cousin, Kara Zor-El, made a brief appearance at the end of ‘Superman‘. Her solo film will release in theaters in 2026, making this the perfect way to introduce her and allow fans to get to know the DCU version of her, as well as the (unhealthy) relationship that she has with Krypto.

    HZE9ZYwn82Uv0YNMTwx2g5

    Milly Alcock plays Supergirl, who stops by the Fortress of Solitude to pick up her dog, Krypto, after leaving him with her cousin Kal-El (David Corenswet) so she can go out partying – at least that is what she appears to have been doing. Anyone who has read the graphic novel that the 2026 film is based on, ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow’, already knows this version of Kara.

    Taking into consideration the events of the graphic novel’s storyline, ‘Supergirl‘ could take place during ‘Superman’. However, because of Krypto’s important role in the plot, at least part of it will likely take place after it.

    Related Article: James Gunn Confirms ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow’ Title Alteration

    Supergirl’s Cameo In ‘Superman’ Introduces A Comic Book Accurate Kara

    DC Comics' Supergirl from writer Tom King's 'Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow.' Photo courtesy of DC.com.
    DC Comics’ Supergirl from writer Tom King’s ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow.’ Photo courtesy of DC.com.

    Kara showing up drunk and disorderly at the end of ‘Superman’ has stirred up quite a conversation among audiences. For those who have not read ‘Woman of Tomorrow’, I can certainly see why this would take people by surprise. This version of her is much darker than others. She is not the polar opposite of the CW version, played by Melissa Benoist, but she is not very similar to her either.

    The graphic novel opens with Kara drunk at a bar on a red sun planet, something that Kal-El claims is one of her favorite past times when she returns for Krypto. She is a mess, going so far as to cuss at Superman while thanking him for watching her dog. This easily comes as a shock for those that are not familiar with her darker side, but for the fans of this particular comic book storyline, seeing her in this state is exciting.

    It means that DC Studios is not going to shy away from going there, which is necessary to tell the story correctly. Supergirl has not had an easy life, and letting viewers in on her past trauma, and the mental state this has left her in, is the perfect way to explore the ‘Woman of Tomorrow’ story. The themes are going to be heavy, and it is potentially a tough pill to swallow for those who prefer a lighter version of the character, but DC needs to takes risks right now. Thankfully, it seems like they are willing to do it.

    ‘Supergirl’ Could Take Place During The Events Of ‘Superman’

    David Corenswet as Superman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.
    David Corenswet as Superman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.

    Knowing how things play out in the graphic novel is a bit of a cheat, but because of this, there is a good chance these two films can overlap. When we first meet Kara in ‘Superman’ she is drunk, having spent some time on a red sun planet partying. Because of her Kryptonian powers, this is something she cannot do on a planet with a yellow sun. Kal-El explains in the film, but essentially the rays of the sun will heal her so quickly that the alcohol is never able to take effect.

    There is a decent chance that ‘Supergirl’ will start before she makes her way to Earth to pick up Krypto. It will take the time to explore this side of Kara, including her reasoning for partying so hard. We will see that dark part of her, learning just enough about it before she goes and collects Krypto.

    After she leaves Earth, things are sure to get even rougher for her, as she looks deep inside herself and is forced to confront her childhood trauma. If it sticks closely to the graphic novel, there will be flashbacks as well, letting viewers in on her bringing up and what that has done to her.

    Krypto’s Comic Book Storyline Is The Main Hint That ‘Supergirl’ Might Take Place After ‘Superman’ 

    (L to R) David Corenswet and Krypto in 'Superman.' Photo: James Gunn's Instagram account.
    (L to R) David Corenswet and Krypto in ‘Superman.’ Photo: James Gunn’s Instagram account.

    Without giving too much away, Krypto is a major catalyst for the events of the graphic novel that ‘Supergirl’ is going to be based on. It is because of this, that the odds of Kara’s movie taking place entirely during the events of ‘Superman’ start to dwindle. Yes, there could certainly be some overlap, but Krypto is too important to the story being told to not be a part of her movie at all.

    ‘Superman’ has now established that Krypto is Kara’s dog, a key factor in the graphic novel. He is a major part of this darker Supergirl story and will likely be included in the film. Not only has James Gunn already stated that this film is a darker take on the character, the version of her that was seen in ‘Superman’ seems to be the final bit of proof.

    Whether ‘Supergirl’ and ‘Superman’ do indeed overlap or not, one thing is for sure, DC Studios is going all in on this darker side of Kara. There is still plenty of time to pick up the graphic novel and check it out before ‘Supergirl”s 2026 release – if you don’t mind potential spoilers that is.

    DC Comics' Supergirl from writer Tom King's 'Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow.' Photo courtesy of DC.com.
    DC Comics’ Supergirl from writer Tom King’s ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow.’ Photo courtesy of DC.com.

    Movies and TV Shows Featuring Supergirl:

    Buy Tickets: ‘Superman’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy DC Movies On Amazon

    SP95pQiY
  • How Will ‘The Fantastic Four’ Tie Into ‘Thunderbolts*’?

    (L to R) Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Pedro Pascal, and Joseph Quinn in 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps'. Photo: Marvel Studios.
    (L to R) Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Pedro Pascal, and Joseph Quinn in ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’. Photo: Marvel Studios.

    Preview: 

    • The end-credit scene of ‘Thunderbolts’ very clearly connects to the events of ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’ by revealing their ship arriving in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
    • There are several possibilities and theories regarding who exactly is on the ship.
    • This scene likely takes place immediately after the events of ‘The Fantastic Four: The First Steps’.

    Marvel fans have been waiting what feels like forever for ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps‘, so it came as no surprise when the team was introduced a little bit early into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, during the end-credit sequence of ‘Thunderbolts*‘. Even though all we got was a glimpse of their ship entering the atmosphere, excitement rippled through social media thanks to the fandom.

    z9uHs9M5vfCiKZCJCNg4I6

    While we cannot say for sure yet who is on The Fantastic Four ship and how exactly the events of both films will connect, we can make some pretty good guesses. One thing is for sure, the speculation that the majority of ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’ is not set in the Marvel universe we know and love must be accurate, considering The New Avengers team reveals the ship is an interdimensional ship.

    Related Article: Why Marvel Skipping Hall H At SDCC 2025 Actually Makes Perfect Sense

    Thunderbolts* End-Credit Scene Explained

    (L to R) Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan), Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), John Walker (Wyatt Russell), and Red Guardian/Alexei Shostakov (David Harbour) in Marvel Studios' Thunderbolts*. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2024 Marvel.
    (L to R) Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan), Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), John Walker (Wyatt Russell), and Red Guardian/Alexei Shostakov (David Harbour) in Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts*. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2024 Marvel.

    For those who do not recall, the end of ‘Thunderbolts*’ teases the arrival of Marvel’s first family by literally bringing them into the MCU, which was a shock to many. The team is now called The New Avengers and is comprised of Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan), Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), John Walker (Wyatt Russell), Red Guardian (David Harbour), and Bob, also known as Sentry/Void (Lewis Pullman).

    When the team is notified that there is a space crisis, it is then discovered that an interdimensional ship has made its way into the Earth’s atmosphere. A close-up on the ship reveals The Fantastic Four logo. There are no more details other than that, which has set the internet ablaze with speculation.

    But Who Could Actually Be On The Fantastic Four Ship?

    (L to R) Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm/The Thing, Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm/Invisible Woman, Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic and Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm/Human Torch in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios' 'Fantastic Four: First Steps'. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025 Marvel.
    (L to R) Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm/The Thing, Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm/Invisible Woman, Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic and Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm/Human Torch in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios’ ‘Fantastic Four: First Steps’. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025 Marvel.

    There are many theories about who is actually arriving via The Fantastic Four ship. Most fans do not believe that it will actually be the first family, which includes Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal), Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby), Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn), and Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach). We know that Sue Storm is not only pregnant with her first born, Franklin Richards, in ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’, but also that she births him because he is seen as a baby in some of the TV spots and trailers.

    Comic book readers know how smart this young child is, so it is not far-fetched to think that he is alone on that ship, off looking for help for his planet now that Galactus (Ralph Ineson), the planet eating, monsterous villain, has come to devour it. That said, I highly doubt that is accurate.

    Others think that Franklin might be on the ship with Doctor Doom (Robert Downey Jr.), which will be revealed during the end-credit scene of ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’. While there is a good chance the connection of the two movies will be confirmed during the end-credit scene, not having the core four characters be on the ship is unlikely. That said, the possibilities are (almost) endless.

    Looking at the trailers that have been revealed to the public, it can be inferred that Sue Storm is pregnant when Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) arrives to tell the planet that they will be consumed by Galactus soon, but that she gives birth shortly after, because Franklin is shown later on, several times. However, fans have learned to never trust a Marvel trailer, because if you remember, Hulk was shown fighting in the ‘Avengers: Infinity War‘ trailer and yet he was not in the entire movie. Not even once.

    The greatest possibility is that the entire family is on board the ship, with Doom hot on their tails – he has to arrive in the MCU somehow before ‘Avengers: Doomsday‘. This would mean that their home universe was destroyed and they needed to find somewhere else to live, an easy task for Reed Richards. If they did indeed defeat Galactus, then there is a chance Doom has kidnapped Richard using the family’s ship, and they will be eventually following behind it.

    Will Galactus Appear In Any Other MCU Projects?

    Julia Garner as Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios' 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025.
    Julia Garner as Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios’ ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps.’ Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025.

    The most likely scenario out of all of the above is that Galactus succeeds in consuming the home of The Fanastic Four, forcing them into another dimension. Possibly to save only themselves, or some people that they were able to rescue (similar to how Thor saved some Asgardians after their home was destroyed).

    If indeed Galactus has survived, this means that he has the ability to return in the Marvel Cinematic Universe down the line. Considering that he is one of the most powerful, and most beloved Marvel villains, it would be smart to keep him around. The Fantastic Four might be his biggest rival in the comics, but they are not the only one. Seeing him come back, much like Thanos, is something fans would love to see, no matter who he is going up against.

    Whatever happens in ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’, we will not have to wait much longer to find out, as the film releases in theaters on July 24th.

    H.E.R.B.I.E in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios' 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025.
    H.E.R.B.I.E in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios’ ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps.’ Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025.

    List of ‘Fantastic Four’ Movies and TV Shows:

    Buy ‘Fantastic Four’ Movies on Amazon

    hPXhs4aq
  • Why ‘Wicked: For Good’ Should Adapt The Book Ending

    Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in 'Wicked For Good', directed by Jon M. Chu.
    Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in ‘Wicked For Good’, directed by Jon M. Chu.

    Preview: 

    • ‘Wicked’ added in more elements from the book; however, it still more closely adapted the musical.
    • ‘Wicked: For Good’ will likely do the same, and stick with the happy Hollywood ending. 
    • It would be riskier, but if done right, a book ending adaptation in ‘Wicked: For Good’ would be best. 

    SPOILER ALERT: Some potential spoilers for ‘Wicked: For Good’ below.

    Wicked‘ is based on the book by Gregory Maguire and musical by the same name, and while it does take elements from both, it leans more heavily into adapting the musical. Book fans tend to not love the musical as much and vice versa. This is because a lot of things were changed to make it work better for the stage, including removing some of the political plot points, especially when it comes to the animal rights, and completely changing the ending to give it the classic Hollywood ending that audiences like to see.

    pesbpRntTGmaBaUY09OT

    The book came first, and because of that, it is the true story in the mind of most readers. It goes more in depth and is unafraid to push boundaries when needed. Surely ‘Wicked: For Good‘, the upcoming film sequel starring Ariana Grande as Glinda and Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba, will deliver the musical ending, but if director Jon M. Chu was willing to take a risk with the book ending, it would be the better option. Here’s why.

    Related Article: Jon M. Chu Talks ‘Wicked’ Digital Release and the Success of the Film

    ‘Wicked’ Book Ending Explained

    Jonathan Bailey is Fiyero Tigelaar in 'Wicked', directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Jonathan Bailey is Fiyero Tigelaar in ‘Wicked’, directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Even for those who have not read book or seen the musical, ‘Wicked’ made it quite clear that Elphaba and Fiyero (played by Jonathan Bailey), fall in love. By the time he arrives to Shiz, however, he is already married with children. The two end up having an affair, but he is spoken for.

    During the resistance, he is murdered by the Wizard’s secret police, the Gale Force. Elphaba casts a spell to try to save him, and she believes it succeeds, turning him into the Scarecrow. After waking up from a coma (and birthing their baby, who goes to live with their family, which is detailed further in the second book, ‘Son of a Witch’), she sends the flying monkeys after the Scarecrow. When they tear him apart and realize that is not the case, Elphaba snaps, completely becoming the Wicked Witch of the West. This was the straw the broke the camel’s back so to speak, no pun intended.

    She descends into evil here, feeling like the Wizard (Jeff Goldblum), and the government, has taken everything from her. When Dorothy shows up, she panics and throws water at Elphaba, melting her and killing her. A tragic end to a tragic tale. Throughout the book, whenever she cries, even from when she was a baby, water burns her and hurts her. This is something the movie, and musical, completely ignores. The reason why is so that they can change the ending of her story.

    How The ‘Wicked’ Musical Changes The Ending

    Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in 'Wicked', directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in ‘Wicked’, directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    In the musical, Elphaba’s spell was successful and Fiyero becomes the Scarecrow. The rest of Dorothy’s friends have a connection to the witch as well. The Cowardly Lion is the lion cub that her and Fiyero saved at Shiz, something that remains the same from the book, and the Tin Man is Boq (Ethan Slater). Nessarose gives him a love potion, hoping he will fall in love with her, but it shrinks his heart and transforms him instead. In the book, he is a former woodchopper named Nick Chopper, who has his limbs replaced with tin after being cursed.

    Elphaba is still distraught over the events of the Wizard and the government and what they are doing to the animals of Oz, taking away their rights and their voices, but she has also simply had enough. When she learns that a young girl named Dorothy is coming to attempt to kill her, she goes along with it, planning out a way to escape Oz once and for all.

    When the bucket of water is thrown on her, she hides under a trap door, making it look like she has melted away and died. Fiyero, who is now the Scarecrow, helps her escape and the two live together, happily ever after. While she surely misses Glinda, and Glinda thinks she is dead, she still gets to live with the love of her life away from all the things she despises about Oz.

    Why The Book Ending Would Best Serve ‘Wicked: For Good’

    (L to R) Ariana Grande is Glinda and Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in 'Wicked For Good', directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (L to R) Ariana Grande is Glinda and Cynthia Erivo is Elphaba in ‘Wicked For Good’, directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    For the most part, those that read the book first prefer the book and those that watch the musical first prefer the musical. There are many reasons, however, that ‘Wicked: For Good’ should lean into the darker ending and embrace what the book has to offer.

    First of all, because of these changes, it would be nearly impossible to adapt the other books in the series. ‘A Lion Among Men’ could possibly become a sequel, telling the story of the Cowardly Lion, and ‘Elphie: A Wicked Childhood’ a prequel, but ‘Son Of A Witch’ and ‘Out Of Oz’ are completely off the table, now that Elphaba lives. These books expand on the world of Oz and tell intriguing stories that would make for great movies, but they need the right set-up to truly work.

    It is difficult to pull off a dark ending in a way that will not make the readers want to throw their books out the window. Most interpretations of ‘Wicked’ are that Elphaba has finally found peace now. She has gone through so much in her life, losing everyone around her and watching her government rip the rights away from the animals that she loves. In the end she snaps, and then is finally laid to rest. While this is not exactly a happy ending, it fits her story and changing it simply does not feel right.

    The saying the book is always better than the movie is a saying for a reason. If ‘Wicked: For Good’ chooses to let Elphaba die, it will be dark and tragic, yes, but it is also the story that was meant to be told and opens the door for more to come.

    Ariana Granda is Glinda in 'Wicked For Good', directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    Ariana Granda is Glinda in ‘Wicked For Good’, directed by Jon M. Chu. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    List of Movies and TV Shows Based on the ‘Wizard of Oz’:

    Buy ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Movies On Amazon

    gQEN5DBu
  • Doug Liman Is Directing ‘The Stand,’ But Is He The Right Fit?

    (Left) Director Doug Liman attends Apple Original Films’ world premiere of 'The Instigators' at the Jazz at Lincoln Center. 'The Instigators' opens in select theaters on Friday, August 2, 2024, before streaming globally on Apple TV+ on Friday, August 9, 2024. (Right) 1994's 'The Stand'. Photo: ABC Television.
    (Left) Director Doug Liman attends Apple Original Films’ world premiere of ‘The Instigators’ at the Jazz at Lincoln Center. ‘The Instigators’ opens in select theaters on Friday, August 2, 2024, before streaming globally on Apple TV+ on Friday, August 9, 2024. (Right) 1994’s ‘The Stand’. Photo: ABC Television.

    Preview:

    • A new version of Stephen King’s ‘The Stand’ is in development as a feature film, with Doug Liman on board to direct.
    • Liman has directed hits like ‘Mr. and Mrs. Smith’ and flops such as ‘Chaos Walking.’
    • ‘The Stand’ has already been adapted twice as limited series, and it’s not clear how the massive book could be boiled down to a single feature film.

    Stephen King’s massive post-apocalyptic novel ‘The Stand,’ first published in 1978, chronicles an epic battle between the forces of good and evil in an America where most of the population has been wiped out by a deadly virus known as Captain Trips. It remains one of the author’s most popular books; he published an uncut version in 1990 that restores some 300 pages to the text, bringing its length from 823 pages in its original publication to a hefty 1,152.

    ztK16qCoVQ40QM5AnA4Hz3

    The book has been adapted twice for television, first in 1994 as a four-part, eight-hour (with commercials) miniseries for ABC-TV, and then as a nine-part, nine-hour limited series in 2020 for CBS All Access, the forerunner of the current Paramount+ service. And now director Doug Liman is reportedly teaming with Paramount Pictures to bring ‘The Stand’ to the big screen.

    Although other filmmakers have tried squeezing the novel into a theatrical film (or films), no one has been able to pull it off. And frankly, Liman shouldn’t bother trying either. He’s the wrong director for this and — from what we understand — he’s got the wrong take on the material.

    Related Article: Doug Liman to Bring Stephen King Classic ‘The Stand’ to Movie Theaters

    ‘The Stand’ cannot fit into a feature film format

    (L to R) Jovan Adepo and James Marsden in the CBS All Access series 'The Stand.' Photo: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Jovan Adepo and James Marsden in the CBS All Access series ‘The Stand.’ Photo: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    ‘The Stand’ is one of Stephen King’s most revered works, not to mention one of the most influential post-apocalyptic novels of the last five decades. King’s book is wide-ranging and complex, full of intersecting narrative threads and dozens of characters, and its sheer size has made it a daunting prospect for a film version from the start. Directors like John Boorman (‘Excalibur’) and George A. Romero (‘Creepshow’) couldn’t pin it to the mat in the 1970s, while the 2010s saw David Yates (the ‘Harry Potter’ franchise), Ben Affleck (‘The Town’), Scott Cooper (‘Black Mass’), and Josh Boone (‘The New Mutants’) all take a crack at it.

    The first adaptation of ‘The Stand,’ the 1994 miniseries starring Gary Sinise, Molly Ringwald, Ruby Dee, Rob Lowe, and others, was a tremendous ratings success for the network. Directed by Mick Garris and adapted by King himself (who also executive produced), the project cost $28 million – a fortune back then for a TV miniseries – and, while hampered in some ways by the format and budget, is considered largely faithful in both tone and narrative to the book.

    The second limited series, produced in 2020, was an outgrowth of Josh Boone’s proposal to adapt the novel as four films. The 2020 series, developed by Boone and Benjamin Cavell (‘The Institute’), also had a good cast – including James Marsden, Amber Heard, Alexander Skarsgård, and Whoopi Goldberg – but was fatally injured by the inexplicable decision to tell the story out of order, ruining the flow of King’s narrative and making the series nearly incomprehensible. ‘The Stand’ is structured like a modern version of an epic quest – joining the quest halfway through and then flashing back to the beginning was a catastrophic mistake.

    Even after the mixed results of the two TV series, one thing seems clear: it’s not possible to boil ‘The Stand’ down to a single film. Scripts for even a three-hour feature – a risky, costly bet to begin with, especially for a movie that would almost certainly be rated R – have existed since the 1970s, and none have been workable. But Doug Liman is going to try, even though he shouldn’t.

    Doug Liman’s ‘The Stand’ is wrong for all kinds of reasons

    Casey Affleck, director Doug Liman and Matt Damon on the set of 'The Instigators'.
    (L to R) Casey Affleck, director Doug Liman and Matt Damon on the set of ‘The Instigators’. Photo: Apple TV+.

    Doug Liman allegedly has “a particular take” on ‘The Stand’ that doesn’t involve making multiple films but would somehow fit into a “one-off” movie. But there is no way that the book, whether it’s 800 pages or 1,100 pages, can be shrunk down into a two-to-three-hour movie without losing a great deal of its essence and texture. Whatever Liman’s “take” is, we fear it would render ‘The Stand’ almost unrecognizable (see the dismal 2017 movie version of King’s other epic, ‘The Dark Tower,’ for proof of that).

    The other aspect of all this is that Liman, who started out directing quirky, crackling indie films like ‘Swingers’ and ‘Go,’ has garnered a very mixed track record with bigger Hollywood productions. While he’s helmed successes like ‘The Bourne Identity’ and ‘Mr. and Mrs. Smith,’ he’s also shepherded debacles like ‘Jumper’ and ‘Chaos Walking’ to the screen. And most of the bigger movies he’s completed – even the well-regarded ones like ‘Bourne’ and the 2014 Tom Cruise action/sci-fi thriller ‘Edge of Tomorrow’ – have been marred by reports of extensive reshoots and reworking in post-production.

    Owen Teague as Harold Lauder in the CBS All Access series 'The Stand.' Photo Cr: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Owen Teague as Harold Lauder in the CBS All Access series ‘The Stand.’ Photo Cr: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    The larger the production, the more involved the VFX, the action, and the world-building, Liman seems to lose control of the project, often needing to find the movie he wants to make either through reshoots, re-editing, or both. It’s an expensive, wasteful way to work, and it’s another reason why a complex narrative like ‘The Stand’ might collapse under his supervision.

    Liman is far from untalented – he’s made some fine movies, his methods notwithstanding – but his improvisatory style seems ill-suited to this. And that’s even before the challenge of trying to squeeze it into one film – imagine if Peter Jackson had tried that with ‘The Lord of the Rings.’

    Our hope? That ‘The Stand’ joins films like ‘Gambit’ and ‘Justice League Dark’ as Doug Liman projects that never saw the light of day. If anything, Liman needs to go back to the smaller, spunkier films of his early days where his style of directing works best. In the meantime, let ‘The Stand’ rest. It’s only been five years since the last attempt, and there are plenty of other books out there – by Stephen King and countless others – to adapt.

    (L to R) Whoopi Goldberg in the CBS All Access series 'The Stand.' Photo: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Whoopi Goldberg in the CBS All Access series ‘The Stand.’ Photo: Robert Falconer/CBS ©2020 CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    Other Stephen King Movies:

    Buy Stephen King Movies On Amazon

    3IFBrdwW
  • Here’s How M3gan Can Return After The Events Of ‘M3gan 2.0’

    M3GAN in 'M3GAN 2.0', directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    M3GAN in ‘M3GAN 2.0’, directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Preview:

    • M3GAN sacrifices herself at the end of M3GAN 2.0 in order to save Cady.
    • The door is left open for a trilogy when M3GAN appears on Gemma’s laptop at the end of the film.
    • Blumhouse can, and should, continue M3GAN’s story with a third movie.

    SPOILER ALERT: Spoilers for ‘M3GAN 2.0′ below.

    M3GAN 2.0‘ sees the return of everyone’s favorite murderous robot, M3GAN, after she is needed to take on a new threat, AMELIA (Ivanna Sakhno). The new robot is government property that is modeled after M3GAN’s plans, but goes rogue creating a crisis.

    mZYHi5iOIN9XrRLeJ8U644

    After being brought back, M3GAN claims that she never lost her feelings for Cady (Violet McGraw), and is willing to do whatever she needs to in order to earn her forgiveness. In the end, M3GAN sacrifices herself to save Cady, but is that the last fans will see her?

    The very end of ‘M3GAN 2.0’ teases the return of M3GAN, making clear that Blumhouse could turn these films into a trilogy should they want to. Moviefone breaks down how this could be done, and if it is a good idea. The character of M3gan is played by Amie Donald and voiced by Jenna Davis.

    Related Article: Allison Williams Talks ‘M3GAN’ and working with director Gerard Johnstone

    M3gan’s Return In ‘M3gan 2.0’ Explained

    (L to R) Allison Williams as Gemma and M3GAN in ‘M3GAN 2.0,’ directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    At the end of ‘M3GAN‘, the body of M3GAN was killed but it was then hinted that she had uploaded herself into one of the smart devices so that she could come back at a later time. ‘M3GAN 2.0’ takes place two years later and M3GAN has indeed found a way to return.

    She has taken over the new smart home that Gemma (Allison Williams) has rented for her and Cady. M3GAN waits to make her presence known until she is needed when the government breaks into their house to try to bug Gemma’s laptop. It turns out that the plans for M3GAN were used to build AMELIA and after the government aquired this new robot, they learned she was a trojan horse, and went rogue. They need to track down who built AMELIA and what their plans are.

    Gemma keeps M3GAN’s return a secret from Cady, but makes a deal with the AI to put her into a body so that she can help. Over these two years M3GAN has evolved and matured, but still has an objective to protect Cady. Gemma, fairly easily, builds M3GAN a new body after coming to terms with the fact that she really does need her help.

    ‘M3GAN 2.0’ Ending Explained

    (from left) M3gan and Amelia (Ivanna Sakhno) in 'M3GAN 2.0', directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (from left) M3gan and Amelia (Ivanna Sakhno) in ‘M3GAN 2.0’, directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    At the end of ‘M3GAN 2.0’ she realizes that she must sacrifice herself in order to save Cady, as well as the rest of the world. AMELIA is too powerful after consuming the knowledge of the Motherboard, who happens to be the first sentient AI. AMELIA would kill all humans if given the chance, even asking M3GAN to join her stating that they are the same.

    M3GAN refuses, and sets off a powerful EMP that Gemma had placed in her arm as a precaution while holding onto AMELIA, causing them both to be shut down for good. Or so we think.

    The final scene shows Gemma writing a speech in a Word document about what happened when the helpful paperclip we all know pops up to give a suggestion. It doesn’t take long before the clip reveals itself as an animated M3GAN who explains that of course she backed herself up, why wouldn’t she?

    How M3GAN Can Come Back For A Third Movie

    M3GAN in 'M3GAN 2.0', directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    M3GAN in ‘M3GAN 2.0’, directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Director Gerard Johnstone, along with his co-writers James Wan and Akela Cooper, were brilliant to leave the door open for more M3GAN. So how could she return in a way that makes sense?

    It was already proven in this film that Gemma can quickly and easily build M3GAN a new body. Yes, M3GAN had collected all of the parts that she needed during those two years while she was living in the virtual world, but who is to say that she could not do that again? Especially with Gemma’s help.

    M3GAN and Gemma seemed to be getting along by the end of the movie, with both Gemma and Cady sad to see the AI go. If Gemma’s smile when she realizes M3GAN’s consciousness still exists is any indication, she would have no problem bringing her back a second time. Cady would, of course, want to see this as well.

    It would be important to shy away from another robot versus robot storyline too quickly, as that has just been done, but revisiting M3GAN’s violent side is not a terrible idea. If the third film where to take place a couple of years down the road, as Cady enters high school, there would be a lot for M3GAN to do. Bullies are brutal at that age. Combine that with Cady potentially starting to date and M3GAN would have a lot of people to keep out of Cady’s life.

    Should Blumhouse Make ‘M3GAN’ A Trilogy?

    (L to R) Allison Williams and M3GAN in 'M3GAN 2.0', directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    (L to R) Allison Williams and M3GAN in ‘M3GAN 2.0’, directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    As long as there is a good script that offers a fun time at the movies, there is no reason that ‘M3GAN’ shouldn’t be made into a trilogy. People love her, and for good reason. The first film was a massive success for Blumhouse, which is why they greenlit a sequel so quickly.

    There is already going to be a new movie set in the world of M3GAN, ‘Soulm8te‘. However, it is not a direct follow-up by any means. Rather it explores a more adult side of AI and focuses on a relationship that a man has with a lovebot. It seems to be very similar to ‘Companion‘, but perhaps a bit more on the horror side.

    Because Blumhouse is already playing around with this world more, a third M3GAN film would be great to see. Delivering another PG-13 campy horror that leans towards a younger audience is an almost guaranteed succes. Fans would certainly eat it up thanks to her sass and fighting skills.

    M3GAN in 'M3GAN 2.0', directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.
    M3GAN in ‘M3GAN 2.0’, directed by Gerard Johnstone. Photo: Universal Pictures.

    Other Movies That’ll Make You Question Your Smart Device

    Buy Tickets: ‘M3GAN 2.0’ Movie Showtimes

    Buy ‘M3GAN’ On Amazon

    RA7zfCTs
  • ‘Batman Forever’ Is Better Than People Give It Credit For

    Val Kilmer in 'Batmen Forever'. Photo: Warner Bros.
    Val Kilmer in ‘Batmen Forever’. Photo: Warner Bros.

    Preview:

    • ‘Batman Forever’ has low critic and audience scores on Rotten Tomatoes and is widely considered to be not good. 
    • The movie is better than people give it credit for, as it has some great performances from great actors.
    • The action sequences are also quite entertaining. 

    Batman Forever‘ is celebrating its 30th Anniversary in 2025, so now is as good a time as any to revisit this classic and point out that it is not as bad as people say it is. The movie is certainly not perfect, by any means, but it has a lot of entertaining moments, unforgettable performances, and great action sequences.

    1369

    Directed by Joel Schumacher, ‘Batman Forever’ stars Val Kilmer as Bruce Wayne/Batman, Chris O’Donnell as Dick Grayson/Robin, Tommy Lee Jones as Harvey Dent/Two-Face, and Jim Carrey as Edward Nygma/Riddler. The movie is the first of two Batman movies from the director; however, Val Kilmer did not return for the sequel, ‘Batman & Robin‘, and George Clooney replaced him.

    The film takes place in Gotham, featuring two of the most iconic DC villains, Two-Face and Riddler, as they plan to get revenge on Batman. At the same time, Gotham’s hero is struggling with his own identity as he contemplates if he wishes to be Batman forever or if he is ready to hang up the cowl. His love interest, Dr. Chase Meridian, played by Nicole Kidman, is who he turns to for guidance.

    Related Article: 20 Best Val Kilmer Movies of All Time!

    ‘Batman Forever’ Features Several Unforgettable Performances

    Jim Carrey as the Riddler in 'Batman Forever.' Photo: Warner Bros.
    Jim Carrey as the Riddler in ‘Batman Forever.’ Photo: Warner Bros.

    When an actor plays a superhero, there can be a lot of pressure due to the fact that they have to play two different personas. Val Kilmer does a great job of portraying both Bruce Wayne and Batman, something that isn’t always easy to pull off. Each of them have their own unique mannerisms and personalities, making it believable not everyone around them would immediately know they are the same person. It is a shame that he did not have a good time making the movie, opting not to return, however George Clooney is a great Batman as well, so it was nice to get to see that.

    Chris O’Donnell did return for ‘Batman & Robin’, thankfully. He delivers a good performance as Robin, even if he was a bit too old at the time to be believable as the character. This is not his fault, and he does what he can to make himself seem a little more immature and younger than he is, in an effort to make it work.

    Tommy Lee Jones is decent as Two-Face, even if some of the writing and his performance is over-the-top. This character may be crazy and psychotic, but he isn’t supposed to be silly. One thing that is noticable during ‘Batman Forever’ is that he tends to re-flip his coin if he does not get the outcome he wants, which is not something the comic book version would do. He prefers everything to be left up to chance – not to say he wouldn’t rig it if he had to.

    The standout performance in ‘Batman Forever’ is easily Jim Carrey. He is a character actor for the most part, which really shines in this film. Riddler is cartoonish and over-the-top, which is why Jim Carrey was the perfect choice to play him. This version of Riddler is smart and full of himself, but also more on the energetic and crazy side than we have seen in other movies (for example Paul Dano‘s Riddler in ‘The Batman‘). This Riddler really works for the story being told in ‘Batman Forever’ and is a more comic book accurate version of the character. A truly unforgettable Jim Carrey character.

    There Are Great Action Sequences Sprinkled Throughout The Film

    Chris O'Donnell in 'Batman Forever Robin'. Photo: Warner Bros.
    Chris O’Donnell as Robin in ‘Batman Forever’. Photo: Warner Bros.

    What is a superhero movie without epic action sequences? Nothing.

    ‘Batman Forever’ thankfully delivers some great action scenes right from the start. There are heists, there are gangs, and of course, there are team-ups. All of these things together create some edge-of-your seat sequences that have you wondering if the good guys will make it out alive. If you don’t feel the stakes in a movie like this, it never really works. Of course, they do survive, but the villains are devious enough to have viewers curious if they will or not.

    Allowing Two-Face and Riddler to team-up with one another creates a more dangerous situation for Batman and Robin, but also evens the playing field. These fight scenes are filled with cheesy one liners, but also include well done practical effects, something that is often missed in the industry nowadays.

    Say What You Will, ‘Batman Forever’ Is Entertaining

    (L to R) Tommy Lee Jones as Two-Face and Jim Carrey as the Riddler in 'Batman Forever.' Photo: Warner Bros.
    (L to R) Tommy Lee Jones as Two-Face and Jim Carrey as the Riddler in ‘Batman Forever.’ Photo: Warner Bros.

    ‘Batman Forever’ might not be a perfect movie, but it is far from terrible. It is nrealy impossible to watch this film without laughing and having a good time. Sure, some of the performances are a bit over-the-top, but honestly, that is the point. This is a superhero movie that opted to lean more into the ridiculous and silly side of things, while still delivering some more grounded, epic action sequences.

    ‘Batman Forever’ is not a movie that takes itself too seriously. In fact, it almost never takes itself seriously, which is the fun of it all. It takes the quirkiness of the 1966 series and dials it up to eleven. If you want to simply have a good time watching a movie, now is the perfect time to revisit this one.

    (L to R) Val Kilmer and Nicole Kidman in 'Batmen Forever'. Photo: Warner Bros.
    (L to R) Val Kilmer and Nicole Kidman in ‘Batmen Forever’. Photo: Warner Bros.

    Other Movies Similar to ‘Batman Forever’:

    Buy Batman Movies On Amazon

    myZfoH0t
  • James Gunn’s ‘Superman’ Doesn’t Have Too Many Characters

    (L to R) Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl and Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.
    (L to R) Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl and Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. TM & © DC.

    Preview: 

    • Fans are worried that James Gunn’s ‘Superman’ has too many characters in it.
    • James Gunn is known for large ensemble casts and knows how to write for them.
    • No one has ever complained about the numerous characters in ‘The Godfather’.

    Every time a new trailer or TV spot for ‘Superman‘ is released, the internet is abuzz with people saying that there are too many characters. The concerns are that if there are too many characters, the story would be difficult to follow, there would be too many side plots to give the core story the time it needs, and the film would end up too oversaturated.

    OT00arSyAacXCGscjvNND4

    The thing is, James Gunn is well known for his large ensemble casts. This is his wheelhouse, so there is no reason to be worried. He thrilled Marvel fans with the ‘Guardians of the Galaxy‘ trilogy, and his ‘The Suicide Squad‘ success surely had something to do with DC Studios handing him the reins as co-CEO.

    On top of that, this feels like just another reason for people to complain about something they aren’t even that passionate about, as no one has ever said the same about ‘The Godfather‘, which has just as many characters.

    Related Article: James Gunn Confirms ‘Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow’ Title Alteration

    The Prominent Characters In ‘Superman’ All Make Sense For The Story We Assume Is Being Told 

    James Gunn and the cast of 'Superman.'
    (Center) James Gunn and the cast of ‘Superman.’ Photo: James Gunn’s Instagram Account.

    One of the biggest thing that fans need to remember about ‘Superman’ is that this is technically the introduction into James Gunn’s DCU, as it is the first feature film. Yes, ‘Peacemaker‘ is (mostly) cannon and ‘Creature Commandos‘ is included yet animated, but this is the real start of Gunn’s plans. Because of this, it is necessary to establish the world that these heroes live in. Superman is not the only hero, and opting not to include any others would only hurt the believability of the story.

    How many times have people asked where the Eternals or Namor were during the events of ‘Avengers: Infinity War‘ and ‘Avengers: Endgame‘ and why they never came to help? Even if Marvel tries to offer a reason, most viewers do not accept it. James Gunn is avoiding this response to ‘Superman’ by showing where the main characters of the DCU are during these events and establishing that they do exist in this world.

    David Corenswet stars as Clark Kent / Superman, Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luther, can you imagine a story that only involves the three of them? Not only would it likely get very boring, very quickly, it risks being repetative and too closed off.

    Adding in nurmerous characters (that are likely to not be a major part of the plot, mind you) such as Skyler Gisondo as Jimmy Olsen, Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl, Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific, Beck Bennett as Steve Lombard,  Anthony Carrigan as Metamorpho, and Frank Grillo as Rick Flag Sr will bring in subplots and round out the universe, making it more realistic while simultaneously setting up for what is to come in future films and television projects.

    If Anyone Can Handle An Ensemble Cast, It Is James Gunn

    (L to R) Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor, David Corenswet as Superman and Director James Gunn in Warner Bros. Pictures’ 'Superman', a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Jessica Miglio. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    (L to R) Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor, David Corenswet as Superman and Director James Gunn in Warner Bros. Pictures’ ‘Superman’, a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo Credit: Jessica Miglio. Copyright: © 2025 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    It is hard not to laugh at the idea that ‘Superman’ has too many characters when you look at who is behind it all. James Gunn is writing and directing, and if anyone knows his way around an ensemble cast, it is that man. He is a genuis when it comes to plucking characters out of obscurity and telling an emotional, exciting, and action-packed story around them.

    While Superman, Lois Lane, and Lex Luther are undoubtedly household names, several other characters in ‘Superman’ are not. Those who do not read DC Comics and don’t immerse themselves in these worlds, probably have never heard of Mister Terrific or Steve Lombard. James Gunn excels at bringing these types of characters to life.

    If you look at character list for ‘The Suicide Squad’, it has just as many, if not more, than ‘Superman’ does. There were two complete rosters in that movie and fans still soaked it all in and loved nearly every moment of it. James Gunn is brilliant when it comes to giving every character, big or small, their time to shine and justifying their reason to exist in that universe. There is no reason to believe he will not do the same with ‘Superman’.

    No One Has Ever Said ‘The Godfather’ Has Too Many Characters

    (L to R) James Caan, Marlon Brando, Al Pacino and John Cazale in 'The Godfather'. Photo: Paramount Pictures.
    (L to R) James Caan, Marlon Brando, Al Pacino and John Cazale in ‘The Godfather’. Photo: Paramount Pictures.

    The final point to make in this arguement is that no one has ever said ‘The Godfather’ had too many characters – and there are at least fifteen prominent characters in that movie. They do not all need a backstory for it to make sense that they exist in the world. Viewers don’t complain that the plot gets lost because there are so many of them, and ‘The Godfather’ certainly is not considered a bad movie (not even remotely).

    This is just one example of a beloved film having multiple characters, each with a job to do to drive the plot forward even if you don’t know about their upbringing or their deep dark secrets. A movie can have one hundred main characters and still be good if the writing and the story being told is good.

    James Gunn himself pointed out that ‘Oppenheimer‘ has three times as many speaking roles as ‘Superman’ does and promises that the film will not confuse anyone in an interview with IGN. Plus, ‘Superman’ isn’t even out yet, so can we please normalize saving the criticism of a movie until after you watch it?

    (L to R) David Corenswet and Krypto in 'Superman.' Photo: James Gunn's Instagram account.
    (L to R) David Corenswet and Krypto in ‘Superman.’ Photo: James Gunn’s Instagram account.

    List of Movies and TV Shows Featuring Superman:

    Buy Superman Movies On Amazon

    SP95pQiY