Author: Tim Hayne

  • ‘Timecop’ Is a 98-Minute High Kick to the Face: Podcast

    TIMECOP“Where we’re going, we don’t need scientific accuracy,” is a line someone should have uttered in the subject of this week’s podcast, 1994’s “Timecop,” a movie that explains time travel by way of Jean-Claude Van Damme‘s mullet and windowless cars that resemble fast-moving garbage.

    1099

    Yes, we’re tackling Tony’s pick, and by “tackling” we mean “beating to a bloody pulp.” Among the topics discussed are: the JCVD school of acting, jokes that aren’t jokes, unsettling nudity, high kicks & high splits, and how “Timecop” — despite all its shortcomings — somehow managed to predict a Trump presidency. (Why isn’t that last point making headlines?! Oh, right. Because this movie is terrible.)

    Tune in next week for Tim’s pick, ’90s teen witch revenge drama “The Craft,” starring Robin Tunney, Fairuza Balk, Neve Campbell, Rachel True, Skeet Ulrich, and all the candles available within the greater Los Angeles area.

    Subscribe to the CAN’T WAIT! podcast:

    Have thoughts/feelings/feedback about the podcast? Have a movie you really, really want us to watch and talk about? Hit us up on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram with the hashtag #CANTWAIT.

    CAN’T WAIT! A Movie Lover’s Podcast by Moviefone celebrates Hollywood’s guiltiest pleasures by taking a fresh look at critically ignored movies and giving them a second chance at life. Join Moviefone editors Tim Hayne, Rachel Horner, Phil Pirrello, and Tony Maccio as they extol the virtues and expose the failings (with love!) of nostalgic movies.

  • 10 Things We Learned on the Set of ‘Alien: Covenant’

    The crew of the Covenant in ALIEN: COVENANTOh, “Alien” franchise, what a wild trip the last four decades have been. You’ve taken us from mining ships to penal colonies to research vessels, never missing an opportunity to jump-scare us with a Xenomorph or two … or three. And now it looks like we’re in for a long overdue blast from the franchise’s bloody, horrific past.

    Yes, the “Alien” franchise has spanned nearly 40 years and five movies (hey, “Prometheus” counts), so when Moviefone was invited to the Australian set of “Alien: Covenant,” the sixth entry in the canon, we jumped at the chance to spend a day geeking out with a small group of like-minded reporters chomping at the bit to catch a glimpse of director Ridley Scott‘s return to the world that put him on the sci-fi map. We got to chat with the man himself (he couldn’t have been kinder or calmer), a few of the special effects masters behind the camera, and the some of the movie’s stars, including Katherine Waterston, Michael Fassbender, and Demián Bichir, to name a few.

    Before we get started, it’s important that you know what “Alien: Covenant” is about, since we’ll be referencing some plot and story points throughout. So here’s the synopsis of the movie, directly from studio 20th Century Fox:

    Bound for a remote planet on the far side of the galaxy, the crew of the colony ship Covenant discover what they think is an uncharted paradise, but is actually a dark, dangerous world, whose sole inhabitant is the synthetic David, survivor of the doomed Prometheus expedition.

    All set? On with the show. Here are 10 things we learned while geeking out on the set of “Alien: Covenant.”

    1. Paradise gets lost real quick.the planet in ALIEN COVENANTOne big thing, time-wise, that producer Mark Huffam revealed to us (that the synopsis fails to mention) is that the action in “Alien: Covenant” takes place 10 years after the events of “Prometheus.” (Kind of a major point, actually.) Huffam also dropped the detail that the crew of the Covenant discovers a “rogue signal” of “human form,” and that distress call is what leads them to a paradise-like planet, one that looks better than where they were originally headed. The crew then lands, as Huffam put it, “on what appears to be a very beautiful, unspoiled paradise of a planet, but from there on, it just all goes downhill for them.” Well said.

    2. There will be blood. So much blood.a bloody med bay in ALIEN COVENANTIf you were unimpressed with the body count and splatter of “Prometheus,” we have news for you: “Alien: Covenant” features a ton of blood, and not just any blood. Special blood. As special visual effects supervisor Neil Corbould explained, the production went to great lengths to get the blood just right, shipping in “a few thousands of dollars”-worth of prop blood, but ultimately using the gooey stuff they invented instead.

    What’s more? Not all the blood they manufactured was human. “… We’ve made some alien blood as well. We’ve made some black blood, and then we’ve got the android white fluid, or whatever that is. Uh yeah, so we’ve made quite a few different types, different consistencies, different colors. The red blood, we’ve probably made like a thousand liters of red blood, so… You can imagine what the film’s going to be like.” Yeah, we can imagine.

    3. Michael Fassbender is twinning.Michael Fassbender as David in ALIEN COVENANTBeing in a room with Michael Fassbender is like visiting pandas at a zoo. It’s an exciting experience, but you want to stay perfectly still as to not disturb the majesty of the moment. In this case, we interacted with him, which, if he were on the endangered species list, would have landed us all in jail. (There is only one Michael Fassbender, so he should really be on the list.) Fassbender’s synthetic character, David (easily the best part of “Prometheus”), is back for Round 2 in “Alien: Covenant,” along with a new iteration, Walter. Both are played by Fassbender, who, as it turns out, doesn’t really find playing two characters in the same movie all that challenging.

    “It’s pretty straightforward in the fact that Walter is very much a synthetic minus any of the human traits,” he told us. You see, Walter is the result of David’s more human qualities taking root in the David 8 model, which really freaked out the robot-buying public. Walter is all business, all the time — no hair dye or Peter O’Toole movies for him.

    “It’s been 10 years since we last saw [David], without any maintenance,” Fassbender continued. “So those human qualities have sort of gathered momentum a little bit, I suppose. They’re as much a part of him now as his synthetic qualities. But Walter’s just really there to serve the ship and its crew.”

    So, will the next movie have Fassbender playing three parts? We can only dream.

    4. The Covenant is full of couples.The Covenant, as you read in the synopsis above, is a colony ship, one seeking out a habitable planet. It is also a terraforming ship, meaning that it’s full of plants and such. It’s also full of people, and those people, much like the animals on Noah’s ark, come in pairs — presumably, to repopulate whatever planet they settle. And from what we gathered on the set (and in the prologue above), things can get very high school. Things also get very college, as we were told that some of the crew members don’t stay loyal to their significant others. Drama!

    5. A same-sex couple is front and center and it’s no big deal.Nathaniel Dean and Damian Bichir in ALIEN COVENANTDemián Bichir and Nathaniel Dean play a married couple, because, in the future, gay couples are still a thing. Shocker! The movie won’t focus on their relationship and the characters as distinctly gay — in other words, they won’t be walking around the movie wearing flashing neon signs that read “We’re the gay ones.” What makes their relationship distinct, however, is that Bichir’s Sgt. Lope, the head of the ship’s security team, is Dean’s superior officer. When we asked Bichir about the inclusive nature of the characters, he was proud of what the movie is bringing to the table.

    “We are all couples on this ship, all kinds of couples, even men and men,” Bichir explained. “For me, that’s a beautiful side of the story, when you can have these two almost iconic macho types being together and loving each other and being a part of keeping everyone alive.” Awww.

    6. Daniels is not the new Ripley (sort of).Katherine Waterston as Daniels in ALIEN COVENANTAs yet another sign that the “Alien” franchise is going back to its roots, we have the return of a central heroine, this time played by Katherine Waterston, who, by the look of this photo, is channeling Ellen Ripley’s big-gun-and-a-tank-top look. (And pulling it off quite nicely.) Waterston plays Daniels, the ship’s chief terraformist on the Covenant’s colonization mission — not exactly the blue collar gig Ripley had on the Nostromo, but, as Waterston points out, not too far removed. “I think, because she doesn’t think of herself with the captain [played by James Franco], she’s one of [the crew]. Like Ripley in the first ‘Alien,’ she’s technically third in ranking and that changes as the film progresses.” Yeah, we’re pretty sure that “change” comes by way of dying crew members.

    When asked directly about her character’s similarities to Ripley, Waterston acknowledged the comparison, but asserted that Daniels is very different from both the Sigourney Weaver character and Noomi Rapace’s Elizabeth Shaw in “Prometheus.” “I’ve probably been taking cues from [Sigourney Weaver’s] performance on and off screen my whole life,” she said. “It’s just, to me, a very relatable, excellent depiction of a woman. But, at the same time, I loved what Noomi did. It was very different to what Sigourney did. I don’t think she felt any responsibility to be like Sigourney, and I don’t feel any responsibility to be like that.”

    There was one concession to the Ripley comparison, however, that Waterston was happy to make: “I’ll say that, in this, she has really good instincts, like Ripley did.”

    7. “Alien: Covenant” will truly be an R-rated horror movie.Everyone we spoke to about the movie’s R rating emphasized the fact that “Alien: Covenant” will be a hard R. In fact, rating it anything other than R was never an option. From the amount of blood used to the franchise’s return to gory horror, it’s clear that this movie won’t be for the PG-13 crowd. Just watch the red band trailer above and decide for yourself.

    When we spoke to Ridley Scott, he explained returning to the franchise’s horror roots as somewhat inaccurate, because, to him, “Alien” was never really a horror movie. “‘Alien’ was kind of a posh horror film,” he explained. “I never think of it as a horror film, it just scared the sh*t out of people. I think it had too much class to be classified as a horror film. Nothing wrong with horror, but I think horror is: What is real tension? What is real fear? It’s very hard to scare people. In the bloody films you see, which, ironically, are not even frightening, they’re just like, ‘yikes!’ So I thought I’d try to come back and do one.”

    It wasn’t just the “return to horror” aspect of it that got Scott’s blood pumping. He had some questions about the origin of the Xenomorph. “… We’ve come back with a very simple idea, which is Who made them? No one ever asked that question,” he said. “[‘Alien’] was just about there it is, it exists, and this is what it is. So it became seven guys and gals in a steel hull, frankly the very old idea of ‘The Old Dark House.’ Who’s gonna die next? The fundamental basis of ‘Alien’ was a pretty, you know, B-movie, but because of the cast and talent involved it came out an A+ movie. So we’ve reinvented the idea of ‘Alien,’ I think, which is that ‘Covenant’ gets us a step closer to Why was this thing designed, and who did it?

    8. You wanted more aliens? You got ’em … and then some.A xenomorph going in for the kill in ALIEN COVENANTOne question shouted from the rooftops by “Alien” fans after the release of “Prometheus” was an incendiary, all-caps “WHERE ARE ALL THE ALIENS?!!!” Well, Ridley Scott heard you and he’s ready to make amends.

    When asked about fan reaction to “Prometheus,” effects supervisor Corbould served up the most succinct response: “When the gloves are off and it’s 18 or R-rated, then you can make the movie exactly what you want, with more aliens. [Scott] listened to the audience, that they want more aliens — they’re gonna get a lot more aliens. More than they probably anticipated.”

    The movie’s high volume of aliens was confirmed by creature and make-up effects designer supervisor Conor O’Sullivan and creature effects supervisor Adam Johansen, who told us there would be an “enormous amount of creatures” on display in the movie. (Also, we got to play with a facehugger rig, so you’re definitely in for some old-school Xenomorph action.)

    9. “Alien: Covenant” is a little less “Prometheus,” a little more H.R. Giger.Tunnel in the Juggernaut from ALIEN COVENANT“Alien” fans longing for the franchise’s return to the surrealist, organic aesthetic that artist H.R. Giger brought to the first (and subsequent) movies — but disappeared in “Prometheus — are in for a treat. Production designer Chris Segers told us that “Alien: Covenant” is “edging in” to the Giger look and feel. Ooh, cryptic.

    Check out the newest iteration of the Xenomorph in the trailer released just last night.

    10. The sets are make-the-hair-on-the-back-of-your-neck-stand-up fantastic.Daniels explores in ALIEN COVENANTNow, admittedly, this photo has nothing to do with the sets. Just imagine the expression on an “Alien” fan’s face looking somewhat similar to that of Daniels’s when he or she walks onto a soundstage housing one of the most iconic visuals in the franchise’s history. Yes, we stood aboard a Juggernaut, and it was fantastically detailed, dirty, and just as cold as it looks onscreen. We also walked through what can best be described as an Engineer temple, with giant, sculpted Engineer heads lining the rocky temple walls. It was damned impressive.

    So why spend time talking about something we can’t actually show you? To point out that these were NOT digital sets — they were practical sets built with the purpose of better informing the actors’ performances and creating an onscreen experience that feels (and looks) grounded and tangible. It speaks to Ridley Scott’s determination to make “Alien: Covenant” a terrifying, visceral addition to the franchise, one that will (hopefully!) serve as a satisfying first entry in a new “Alien” trilogy.

    “Alien: Covenant” opens everywhere May 19th.

  • Oscars 2017: ‘Moonlight’ Wins Best Picture

    Moonlight best pictureAnd the Oscar for Best Picture goes to … “Moonlight.”

    After a VERY confusing envelope-related mix-up (Emma Stone in “La La Land?”), “Moonlight” took home top honors, beating out the presumed (and almost) winner “La La Land.” In addition to Best Picture, “Moonlight” took home Best Adapted Screenplay, and Mahershala Ali took home the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his role in the movie.

    “Moonlight” is in theaters now.

  • Oscars 2017: ‘City of Stars’ From ‘La La Land’ Wins Best Song

    Oscars 2017 City of Stars La La Land Best SongAnd the 2017 Oscar for Best Song goes to … “City of Stars,” from “La La Land“!

    While Ryan Gosling‘s performance of “City of Stars” may not be as inspiring as “Moana’s” “How Far I’ll Go,” or as dance-inducing as “Trolls’” “Can’t Stop the Feeling,” it is full of FEELINGS. The sentiment of the song is the emotional anchor of “La La Land,” which is likely why Academy voters leaned into it so much. Also, they freakin’ loved “La La Land,” so there’s always that. Justin Hurwitz, who wrote the music, and lyricists Benj Pasek and Justin Paul share the award.

    If you haven’t seen “La La Land” or heard “City of Stars,” you can check out a clip of the song (straight from the movie) right here.“La La Land” is in theaters now.

  • Oscars 2017: Viola Davis Wins Best Supporting Actress

    89th Annual Academy Awards - ShowThird time’s the charm for Viola Davis.

    The actress took home the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for “Fences,” her third nomination and first win. Her first Academy Award nomination came in 2009, when she received a Best Supporting Actress nod for her brief — but intensely memorable — turn in “Doubt,” co-starring Meryl Streep. In 2012, she earned a Best Actress nomination for her role as Aibilene Clark in the big-screen adaptation of “The Help.”

    Davis’s Best Supporting Actress Oscar rounds out an awards season in which she’s already taken home a Golden Globe, a BAFTA, a Critics Choice Award, and a SAG Award for playing Rose Maxson in the film adaptation of August Wilson’s Tony-winning play.

    “Fences,” directed by and co-starring Denzel Washington, is in theaters and streaming now.

  • Oscars 2017: Mahershala Ali Wins Best Supporting Actor

    US-OSCARS-SHOWAnd the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor goes to … Mahershala Ali for “Moonlight“!

    From Netflix’s “House of Cards” to “Marvel’s Luke Cage” to Academy Awards glory, that’s the near-term path for 2017’s Best Supporting Actor winner. Ali has already been nominated and picked up a handful of awards for “Moonlight,” including a SAG Award win and a Critics Choice Award. (It’s also worth noting that Ali took home a SAG Award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture for the critically acclaimed and crowd-pleasing “Hidden Figures.”)

    With all the recognition Ali has received this year, you’ll be seeing a lot more of him in the months and years to come. For now, you can catch him in the aforementioned Netflix series and “Moonlight,” and his latest movie, the Sundance entry “Roxanne Roxanne,” is due in theaters this year.

    If you haven’t seen “Moonlight,” do yourself a favor and watch it. It’s streaming now and will be available on DVD February 28th.

  • Reminder: Print Your 2017 Oscars Ballot Right Now

    2017 oscars ballotIt’s not too late! There’s still time to print (and fill out) your 2017 Oscars ballot.

    We’ve designed an easy-to-read, printable, one-page solution to your Academy Awards ballot needs — perfect for your office Oscar pool, friend group, or any occasion in which you’re attempting to prove your awards knowledge prowess.

    Click on the ballot image below to download your very own PDF featuring all of the Academy Awards’ 2017 nominees, complete with check boxes and score space, or click here to download our 2017 Oscars ballot.printable 2017 oscars ballot 89th academy awardsNeed some help filling out your ballot? In addition to outlining our final predictions for this year’s Oscars, we’ve detailed our picks for who and what should (and will) win in the major categories, including Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress, and Best Actor, and we’ve predicted more than a few things you’re all but guaranteed to see at this year’s ceremony.

    The 89th Academy Awards, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, will air Sunday, February 26th at 7:00 p.m. ET / 4:00 p.m. PT on ABC.

    Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook, and be sure to follow us on Twitter as we live-tweet the Oscars.

  • Oscars 2017: Who Will Win Best Actor?

    Oscars 2017 best actor nomineesAnd the Oscar goes to … ?

    We’re just days away from Hollywood’s biggest night — the 89th Academy Awards (Feb 26 at 7:00 p.m. ET / 4 p.m. PT on ABC) — which means it’s crunch time. Time for you to fill out your Oscars ballot and lock in your picks!

    This week, Moviefone’s editors will be making their picks right along with you, predicting the winners in the show’s four biggest categories. Today, we’re revealing our picks for Best Actor. And the nominees are…

    Here, we’re sharing who we think will win, as well as who we feel truly deserves to take home the Academy Award.

    Tim Hayne

    Who Will Win: Casey Affleck. He’s already won a BAFTA, a Golden Globe, and a Critics’ Choice Award for the role, so he’s pretty much a lock at this point.

    Who Should Win: Casey Affleck. Politics aside, Affleck delivers the best performance of his career, edging out Denzel Washington in the process. (Sorry, Denzel, but you’ve got your Tony for the same role to keep you warm at night.) His turn as Lee Chandler is nuanced, layered, and downright hypnotic. Who would of thought watching someone look so uncomfortable could be so entertaining?

    Phil Pirrello

    Who Should Win: Casey Affleck. Nominated for Oscar once before, for “The Assassination of Jesse James,” Affleck anchors this family drama ensemble with a very grounded, very minimalist performance of a man who just can’t beat the guilt he suffers over a tragedy that makes it hard for him to move forward, but not impossible.

    Who Will Win: Denzel Washington. Affleck’s very internalized performance is a career-best, and he was also the frontrunner, until recent controversies surrounding his personal life bubbled up in the newscycle and Denzel (his only main competition) won the SAG award for Best Actor. Since actors — Affleck’s peers — represent a large majority of Academy voters, dollars-to-donuts they will help drive Washington to his third Oscar win. While Affleck has lost some steam going into the home stretch, Washington has gained considerable ground for his robust, nuanced (and sometimes over the top) turn as an ex-baseball prospect-turned-bitter garbage man, husband, and father.

    Drew Taylor

    Who Will Win: Denzel Washington. Sure, Denzel Washington is commanding in his adaptation of the August Wilson play (Washington also directed and produced), but there are moments that feel hackneyed and unearned, and at least two times when Washington forgets his line and pauses in the middle of one of his bellicose speeches (thanks to some handy sound effects, it looks like Washington is just getting distracted by a noise off-camera). But it’s the kind of sturdy, talky, classical, theatrical performance that the Academy eats up with a fork and spoon. Washington is great but his performance (and the movie) aren’t all that. Still, I think that it’s likely he’ll walk away with a little gold man on Oscar night.

    Who Should Win: Casey Affleck. I would have said Ryan Gosling, but his A+ performance last year came in Shane Black’s criminally under-appreciated “The Nice Guys” and not the more openly lauded “La La Land.” So I’m going to kick my pick over to the most controversial contender, Casey Affleck. Affleck has come under fire for reports of sexual harassment that have resurfaced during this year’s Oscar race, and, while those shouldn’t be totally ignored, they don’t have much baring on his performance as a man who is forced to take care of his brother’s teenage sun (after the brother drops dead). It’s the kind of delicate, achy, deeply human performance that Affleck is so good at. (It was originally written for Matt Damon, who was also supposed to direct.) It lacks the pomposity that defines many of the other nominees (even Viggo Mortensen, in an otherwise smaller film, manages to be quite large) and that will ultimately prove his downfall. But it doesn’t matter. It’s an amazing performance by one of the country’s most talented actors.

    Rachel Horner

    Who Will Win: Usually, this category has a clear winner, but I am very torn between Denzel Washington for “Fences” or Casey Affleck for “Manchester by the Sea.” I go back and forth between the two, but it will be one of them, for sure.

    Who Should Win: Casey Affleck. Listen, we all know Denzel Washington is one of the greatest actors of our time, but he didn’t bring his best performance to “Fences.” It was 100% Viola Davis’s movie. Affleck gave one of the most nuanced and emotional performances of 2016, and he deserves the gold.

    Tony Maccio

    Who Will Win: Casey Affleck. It’s hard to find flaws within Affleck’s portrayal of a man thrown into the guardianship of his nephew after his older brother passes away. Kenneth Lonergan once again crafted a script in which moments aren’t forced and the dialogue feels grounded and real. Affleck channels Lonergan’s writing into an understated performance that draws a true sense of empathy from the audience.

    Who Should Win: Denzel Washington. The ability the translate emotive power from stage to screen is no easy task, but Washington brings “Fences” patriarch Troy Maxson to life in a way that we’ve never seen before.